Servicing Strategy Report - waterloo.ca

Servicing Strategy Report Waterloo North Hospice 2050 University Avenue East City of Waterloo May 2017

1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202

Cambridge, ON N1R 6Z2

t 519.623.1140 f 519.623.7334

www.meritech.ca

Project No.: 1304

Servicing Strategy Report

K:\Projects\1304\60-Design\1304.Servicing Strategy.rpt.docx May 2017 Page i

Executive Summary The proposed development is to include the construction of the Hospice of Waterloo Region. The site is 2.02 hectares in size and is located off a laneway connected to University Avenue in Waterloo, Ontario. The site is bordered by existing residential lands to the south, RIM Park and sports fields to the north and west, and an existing stormwater management pond to the south-east. The development is proposed to connect to an existing 200mm diameter sanitary sewer located in a Park Block between 904 and 908 Atlantic Boulevard. The existing sanitary sewer was installed as part of the Eastbridge Forest Subdivision. A 150mm diameter watermain will be extended to the site for firefighting supply (internal hydrant and sprinkler system) and domestic water supply. The watermain is proposed to be extended from Atlantic Boulevard through the Park Block. It is proposed that both quality and quantity control for the stormwater leaving the site be managed within the existing stormwater pond adjacent the site. Runoff from the site can be conveyed by a 525mm diameter storm sewer before discharging to the pond forebay through a new headwall. The Millennium Recreation Project Stormwater Report shows that there is sufficient additional capacity in the existing stormwater pond to manage quality and quantity while maintaining allowable discharge rates. Waterloo North Hydro, Union Gas, Rogers, and Bell Canada have confirmed services in the vicinity. Services are not immediately adjacent to the property and would need to be extended to the site. This will be coordinated at the detailed design stage. Approval agencies shall review and approve this document as a suitable approach to a preliminary design configuration in support of the zoning by-law amendment application. Comments from this preliminary servicing strategy can be incorporated into the detailed design.


K:\Projects\1304\60-Design\1304.Servicing Strategy.rpt.docx May 2017 Page ii

Use and Reproduction of This Document No part of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transcribed in any form, or by means including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording and scanning without the prior written approval of the author.

For Further Information For further information regarding this report please contact the author at the following address:

Meritech Engineering Attention: Mr. Ian S. Robertson, P.Eng. Director of Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202 Cambridge, ON N1R 6Z2 t (519) 623-1140 f (519) 623-7334 email: [email protected]


K:\Projects\1304\60-Design\1304.Servicing Strategy.rpt.docx May 2017 Page 1

Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................. 3

Approach ..................................................................................................................... 4

Policy Framework ......................................................................................................... 4

Planning Documents .................................................................................................. 5

Watershed Plans ....................................................................................................... 5

Stormwater Management Studies ............................................................................... 5

MOE Guidelines ......................................................................................................... 5

Regional Guidelines ................................................................................................... 5

Municipal Guidelines .................................................................................................. 5

Conservation Authority Guidelines ............................................................................... 6

Geotechnical Studies .................................................................................................. 6

Pre-Consultation/Design Criteria ................................................................................. 6

Reconnaissance ......................................................................................................... 6

Objectives and Criteria .................................................................................................. 6

Sanitary Servicing ...................................................................................................... 6

Water Servicing ......................................................................................................... 7

Storm Servicing ......................................................................................................... 8

Stormwater Management ........................................................................................... 8

Grading and Drainage ................................................................................................ 8

Transportation .......................................................................................................... 8

Utilities ..................................................................................................................... 8

Discussion .................................................................................................................... 9

Site Design ............................................................................................................... 9

Sanitary Servicing ...................................................................................................... 9

Water Servicing ........................................................................................................10

Existing Infrastructure ...........................................................................................10

Proposed Development ..........................................................................................10

Storm Servicing ........................................................................................................10

Stormwater Management ..........................................................................................11

Water Quantity .....................................................................................................11

Water Quality .......................................................................................................11

Grading and Drainage ...............................................................................................11

Transportation .........................................................................................................12

Utilities ....................................................................................................................12

Conclusions .................................................................................................................12

Recommendations .......................................................................................................13

References ..................................................................................................................13

List of Figures Figure 1: Site Location .................................................................................................. 3

Figure 2: Approach Flowchart ........................................................................................ 4

Figure 3: Existing Condition Photographs ........................................................................ 7



List of Tables Table 1: Average Daily Flows ......................................................................................... 9

Appendices Appendix A: Concept Plan

Appendix B: Grading/Servicing Concept Appendix C: Calculations

Appendix D: Agency Correspondence

Appendix E: Pre-Consultation Minutes



Introduction The 2.02 hectare site is a relatively square parcel and currently fronts a gravel laneway leading to University Avenue as shown in Figure 1. The site is proposed to house a new hospice facility in North Waterloo. The site is bordered by existing residential lands to the south, RIM Park and sports fields to the north and west, and an existing stormwater management pond to the east. The site is designated an Employment area in the City of Waterloo Official Plan and is currently zoned as Agricultural. An existing dwelling and several barns and storage sheds have recently been demolished. The property was previously serviced by private well and septic bed. The land currently sits vacant. The site is fairly flat; however, a majority of the site drains to the east towards the existing stormwater pond.

Figure 1: Site Location



Step Three Detailed Design or Final Design

This circulation integrates the recommendations of the preliminary design into the final site engineering. Approval of this report allows for construction of the proposed development.

Approach The following flowchart explains a typical submission and approval process. The section highlighted in grey indicates the status of this circulation:

Figure 2: Approach Flowchart

Policy Framework This chapter outlines the framework upon which the plan is built upon. Previous studies, municipal and provincial standards, as well as any field investigations undertaken to support the project, are examples of information described in this chapter. This background information is then used to build an appropriate plan for the site. The next chapter, Objectives and Targets, describes the site-specific requirements noted from the following sources:

Step One Feasibility of the Development

This circulation establishes the framework for the project and provides a direction for how the site is to develop. This report shows the proposed development is suitable for

the proposed zoning and is able to be serviced with standard municipal services.

Step Two Preliminary Design

This circulation describes how the plan satisfies the objectives for the site, confirms spatial relationships of the plan within the confines of the site, and provides recommendations to be implemented in the detailed design. For site plans, Site Plan

approval is contingent upon approval of the Preliminary Design.



Planning Documents City of Waterloo Official Plan, October 2014 The subject lands are designated Employment with a future development node shown near the intersection of University Avenue and Woolwich Street. City of Waterloo Zoning By-law, February 26, 2015 The subject lands are currently zoned Agricultural.

Watershed Plans Eastbridge District North Master Drainage Plan, January 1997 The master drainage plan outlines the drainage goals and objectives for an area that was proposed to be developed in the northeast part of the City of Waterloo.

Stormwater Management Studies Millennium Recreation Project–Final Stormwater Management, Stantec Consulting Ltd., 2000 This report details the stormwater drainage plan for the subject property and surrounding area draining to the stormwater pond on the eastern boundary of the site.

MOE Guidelines Stormwater Management Planning and Design Manual, Ministry of the Environment, 2003 This manual provides guidelines on the planning and design of stormwater management facilities in Ontario.

Regional Guidelines Design Guidelines and Supplemental Specifications for Municipal Services (DGSSMS) The design portion of this annually-updated document (Part B) should be considered as guidelines that provides the municipalities’ design preferences under normal circumstances. These guidelines are read together with Municipal guidelines and standards in place.

Municipal Guidelines City of Waterloo Development Engineering Manual, 2013 This manual provides design guidelines for servicing and grading of developments. It also includes a list of coefficients to be used in modelling of synthetic design storms. Aesthetic Principles for Storm Water Management, City of Waterloo, 1996 In accordance with accepted practice throughout the Region of Waterloo, this document describes the preferred features to be incorporated into stormwater management facilities in order to achieve aesthetic and functional objectives.



Conservation Authority Guidelines Greater Golden Horseshoe Area Conservation Authority Erosion & Siltation Control Guideline for Urban Construction, December 2006 This document describes the methodology for determining the erosion potential of a site and the measures that should be undertaken to mitigate construction disturbance.

Geotechnical Studies A geotechnical study will be required for the site. One had not yet been completed at the time of the writing of this report.

Pre-Consultation/Design Criteria A Pre-Application Consultation was held on November 14, 2016 to discuss the Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the redevelopment of the lands. Comments from the City of Waterloo dated November 24, 2016 have been included in Appendix E. Key items from these comments are included in the following chapter entitled ‘Objectives and Criteria’.

Reconnaissance Meritech staff visited the site on April 10, 2017 in order to verify existing drainage patterns of the site and adjacent properties, to confirm existing infrastructure surrounding the site, and to make note of aboveground features on neighbouring properties. See Figure 3 for existing conditions photographs.

Objectives and Criteria This section outlines the objectives and criteria for the wide variety of issues considered in this report; the following Discussion section will demonstrate how the objectives presented have been achieved and how the criteria are met.

Sanitary Servicing The primary objective with respect to sanitary servicing is that a sanitary sewer system servicing the site can be constructed as per MOE, Region of Waterloo (SSMS) and City of Waterloo standards. Flows from the proposed development will outlet into an existing 200mm diameter sanitary sewer located in the Park Block between 904 and 908 Atlantic Boulevard. Flow rates from the site will be provided at the detailed design stage for the City to ensure capacity in the proposed infrastructure. The sanitary service will be designed to accommodate proposed expansion on the property as shown on the site plan.



Looking west from the center of site Looking west along north property line

Looking west from the center of site Existing storm pond headwall

Figure 3: Existing Condition Photographs

Water Servicing There are two objectives regarding water servicing: provide domestic water supply as per Provincial, Regional and City requirements, and ensure that an adequate fire-fighting water supply is available as per Ontario Building Code and other Regional requirements (FUS). An existing 150mm diameter watermain exists on Atlantic Boulevard and is accessible by a Park Block between 904 and 908 Atlantic Boulevard. The Region of Waterloo has provided pressure information for a junction located at the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and Whitecap Avenue. This information has been used to demonstrate that the water distribution system and proposed internal water system is able to provide fire protection as per OBC and FUS guidelines.



Storm Servicing The primary objective with respect to storm servicing is that a storm sewer system servicing the site can be constructed as per MOE, Region of Waterloo (SSMS) and City of Waterloo standards. The development is proposed to drain to the existing stormwater pond located to the east of the site. On-site stormwater management features should be reviewed in conjunction with the storm servicing.

Stormwater Management A stormwater management plan was prepared for the Millennium Recreation Project which includes drainage area from the subject property. In the plan the subject property was to drain uncontrolled to the stormwater management pond. With the development of the site it is now proposed to drain to the pond through a combination of overland and piped flows. Flows from the developed site are to be controlled within the existing facility to below the allowable discharge levels previously accounted for in the pond design.

Grading and Drainage Grading of the development site may be determined by a number of factors including:

• Directing overland flows to the existing stormwater management facility • Matching existing elevations at proposed road/laneway intersection • Matching elevations along neighboring properties • Providing sufficient cover on watermain and sewers • Conforming to a typical road cross-section and typical site grading requirements • Minimizing earthmoving costs

Transportation Improvements to the laneway connecting the site to University Avenue are proposed as part of this project to support road traffic to and from the facility.

Utilities The following utility companies are required to confirm their ability to service the development and have been circulated.

• Canada Post • Waterloo North Hydro • Bell Canada • Rogers Cable • Union Gas



Discussion

Site Design The site is proposed to be developed to accommodate a hospice facility including landscaped spaces and parking areas. The site is proposed to allow for an additional building, future building expansion and future parking areas. The concept plan in Appendix A details the proposed building, parking and landscaped area. The site is accessed by a laneway connecting the site to University Avenue. Grading and paving of the laneway is proposed as part of the site works to support this project.

Sanitary Servicing A new sanitary service is proposed to be extended from an existing 200mm diameter sanitary sewer located in the Park Block between 904 and 908 Atlantic Boulevard. The existing sanitary sewer and manhole were installed as part of the Eastbridge Forest Subdivision. The sanitary sewer will have sufficient depth to service the proposed hospice building and proposed expansion building by gravity. An open cut excavation is proposed for the sanitary sewer installation, including through the adjacent intermittent watercourse. Based on the size of the proposed building, peak flows were determined by applying peaking factors to the average day demands shown in Table 1. This design flow was calculated using the DGSSMS water demands for institutions. Preliminary design of the hospice facility indicates there will be ten beds in the residential portion of the facility. The DGSSMS provides a design flow of 0.015 L/s/bed for hospital which could apply to this development. With ten beds, the average flow would be 0.15L/s. The more conservative approach was applied to the site to determine sanitary design flows. This also considers future servicing requirements for the proposed expansions. A conservative peaking factor of 4.0 was applied to the design flow.

Unit Type Flow Area (ha)

Design Flow (L/s)

Peaking Factor

Peak Flow (L/s)

Institutional 0.25 L/s/ha 2.02 0.505 4 2.02

Infiltration 0.25 L/s/ha 2.02 0.505 - 0.51

Total: 1.1 Total: 2.53

Table 1: Average Daily Flows

The proposed development will generate peak flows of approximately 2.53 L/s as shown in Table 1. This peak flow rate is about 3% of the capacity of the 150mm diameter sewer service to the site and less than 8% of the capacity of the existing 200mm diameter sewer draining to Atlantic Boulevard.



Water Servicing

Existing Infrastructure An existing 150mm diameter watermain exists on Atlantic Boulevard.

Proposed Development The Region of Waterloo has provided pressure information for junction JCT_71325 located at the intersection of Atlantic Boulevard and Whitecap Avenue. A fire flow analysis at this hydrant shows the maximum flow is 166.9 L/s during the maximum day scenario while maintaining the minimum design pressure of 14.0m (140 kPa) at all nodes within the pressure zone. A 150mm diameter watermain is proposed to be extended from Atlantic Boulevard into the site to provide a service for the building and on-site hydrant. It is anticipated that flows and pressure into the site will be sufficient in supplying the sprinkler system demands. An internal hydrant is likely required, as the straight-line distance between the closest existing hydrant and the furthest main building entrance exceeds the OBC maximum of 90 metres. The Site Servicing Plan is included in Appendix B to show the proposed watermains for the site. An open cut excavation is proposed for watermain installation. Fire flow demands for the sprinklered building and the hydrant are yet to be confirmed. Once fire fighting flows have been confirmed for the site hydraulic modeling will be completed to demonstrate adequate flows and pressures can be maintained.

Storm Servicing The primary objective with respect to storm servicing is that a storm sewer system servicing the site can be constructed as per MOE, Region of Waterloo (SSMS) and City of Waterloo standards. Catchbasins are proposed to collect the water from the north parking lots sized to include connection to the future expansion parking area. These will drain towards the southeast corner of the property through a storm sewer. Storm sewers are sized to convey flows from the 5-year storm event. A 525mm diameter storm sewer is proposed to convey water to the existing stormwater pond’s forebay through a new headwall. Flows from the south-eastern portion of the site, including the eastern parking lot are proposed to flow to a double inlet catchbasin prior to discharging to a grassed swale along the south property line, draining towards the existing pond. In larger storm events, overland flow from the northern parking lots (proposed and future expansion) will be into grassed swales prior to discharging to the existing pond.



Stormwater Management

Water Quantity The site was included within the Millennium Recreation Project Stormwater Management Plan prepared by Stantec in May 2000. The site was modeled as being 20% impervious with uncontrolled overland flow to the stormwater management pond detailed as Pond C1. This pond also accepts drainage from the Eastbridge Forest Subdivision to the immediate south of the subject property. The proposed development on the subject site, including the future building and parking lot expansion, will be approximately 70% impervious. Preliminary analysis of the Millennium Recreation Project Stormwater Management Plan and the Eastbridge Forest Stormwater Drainage Plan show that additional contributions to stormwater management pond C1 can be supported. The stormwater catchment draining to the existing pond is 51.25 hectares of which the subject site is 4% of the total catchment. There is existing capacity within both the forebay and live storage volumes. Discharge rates out of the pond currently are less than the allowable discharge rates. Thus, additional flow and volume due to an increase in the imperviousness of the subject property can be controlled within the existing stormwater management pond. A detailed stormwater management brief will be prepared in support of Site Plan Application demonstrating that the existing pond has capacity.

Water Quality Drainage from the site is proposed to be collected and discharged into the existing stormwater pond forebay. Quality treatment is primarily through the use of the pond; however, efforts to include grassed and vegetated filter strips for pre-treatment on the subject site itself will be provided at detailed design.

Grading and Drainage The primary consideration for establishing grades on the site is to provide for major storm routes to convey the surface flow to the existing stormwater management facility. The intent of the proposed grading design is to discharge surface water away from the building envelope. Due to the topographic nature of the site, consideration has been given to designing the site for suitable landscaped use to benefit the hospice building. The limit of grading will typically be to the established property lines. On the eastern property boundary either the installation of a small retaining wall on property line or grading of the earthen berm on the adjacent stormwater management block is required to sufficiently drain water for the north portion of the site. The proposed overall grading of the site will produce a fairly balanced earthworks budget. Assuming a stripping of 0.2m and an overall site pre-grade of 0.75m, the site will yield an approximate surplus of 3,000m3 of material. This value is based on a rough estimation of



the existing and proposed grades. A refined earthworks calculation will be performed during detailed design.

Transportation The existing laneway between University Avenue and the site is proposed to be curbed and paved. A preliminary laneway alignment/grading design has been included with this report for discussion purposes.

Utilities The following utility companies have responded with their ability to service the development:

• Waterloo North Hydro o The area is not currently serviced and it is noted that this site is a unique

circumstance as it does not front a public right of way. Coordination with hydro early in the design stage is required.

• Bell Canada o Bell has underground services on University Avenue.

• Rogers Cable o Rogers has aerial fiber in this area.

• Union Gas o Union Gas has a NPS 4 Intermediate pressure gas main is located within the

University Avenue right of way.

Conclusions It is proposed to extend the existing sanitary sewer located in the park block between 904 and 908 Atlantic Boulevard to the site. A conservative peak flow rate of 2.47L/s is anticipated for the site. Provision of a 150mm diameter watermain into the site to the (sprinklered) building and an internal hydrant is assumed to provide adequate flow and pressure as per MOE and City of Waterloo guidelines for firefighting supply; this will be confirmed during the detailed design stage. It is proposed that both quality and quantity control for the stormwater leaving the site be managed within the existing stormwater pond to the east. Outflows from the site into the pond’s forebay are proposed to be conveyed by a 525mm diameter storm sewer through a new headwall. There is sufficient capacity in the existing stormwater pond to provide quality and quantity control.



Recommendations

The preliminary design should incorporate the conclusions and recommendations stemming from this report. A sanitary sewer for the proposed building will be from the existing manhole located within the Park Block off of Atlantic Boulevard. Storm connections should be provided to the proposed building and parking area to connect to the internal storm sewer system to the SWM facility. The detailed water distribution design should account for fire demand and sprinklers where appropriate. Approval agencies shall review and approve this document as a suitable approach to a preliminary design configuration and re-zoning approval.

References CH2M Gore & Storrie Limited, Eastbridge District North Master Drainage Plan January 1997 Ministry of the Environment, Design Guidelines for Drinking-Water Systems 2008 Ministry of the Environment, Design Guidelines for Sewage Works 2008 Ministry of the Environment, Stormwater Management Planning & Design Manual March 2003 Stantec Consulting Limited, Millennium Recreation Project – Final Stormwater Management

Report May 2000

K: \Pro j ec ts \1304\60-Des ign\1304 .Serv ic ing S tra tegy . rpt .docx

Appendix A: Concept Plan


Appendix B: Grading/Servicing Concept


Appendix C: Calculations

Pipe Velocities: 0.60 m/s min. (pipe full)

Project: North Waterloo Hospice 3.00 m/s max. (actual flow)

File: 1304 n= 0.013 all pipe material

Calc'd by: MJM

Date: Residential average daily flow (q): 275 L/cap/d (B.3.1.2.1 from SSMS)

Chk'd by: STV

Date: Unit extraneous flow (E): 0.25 L/s/ha (B.3.1.2.6 from SSMS)

q = average daily per capita flow (L/cap/d) Manning Equation:

I = Unit of peak extraneous flow (L/s/ha) Qcap. = (D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000 (L/s)

Q(p) = peak population flow (L/s) D: pipe size (mm)

Q(I) = peak extraneous flow (L/s) S: slope (grade) of pipe (%)

Q(d) = peak design flow (L/s) Peaking Factor: 4 n: roughness coeffiecient

0.25 0.25

Institutional Accum Peak Total Accum Extran. Design Length Size Pipe Slope Capacity Velocity Actual

From To Area Area Flow Area Total Q(I) Q(d) L D Mat'l S Qcap. V Q(d)/Qcap Velocity

(L/s) Area (L/s) (L/s) (m) (mm) (%) (L/s) (m/s) (m/s)

Bldg MHS1 1.97 1.97 1.970 1.970 1.970 0.493 2.463 24.0 200 PVC 4.00% 68.442 2.110 3.6% 1.055

MHS1 Ex MH1 0.00 1.97 1.970 0.000 1.970 0.493 2.463 58.0 200 PVC 1.00% 34.221 1.055 7.2% 0.654

Ex MH1 ES8-45 0.00 1.97 1.970 0.000 1.970 0.493 2.463 51.0 200 PVC 1.00% 34.221 1.055 7.2% 0.654

Site

Location PipeInfiltrationInstitutional

11-Apr-17

12-Apr-17

Sanitary Sewer Design Sheet

for

The City of Waterloo

Ref# MOE ref num

ME_V0117

K:\Projects\1304\60-Design\1304.SAN.dsn.xlsx Page 1 of 1

Pipe Velocities: 0.6 m/s min.

Project: North Waterloo Hospice I=A/(Tc+B)^C 6.0 m/s max.

File: 1304 A= 1755 n= 0.024 CSP

Calc'd by: MJM Ref # MOE Ref Num B= 12.347 n= 0.013 Conc./PVC/HDPE

Date: C= 0.882

Chk'd by: STV Tc= 10Date: 5 Year Design Storm

Q =CIA/0.36 Concentration time: tc = ti + tf (minute) Manning Equation:

Where: Q : peak flow (L/s) Where: ti: inlet time before pipe (minute) Qcap.=(D/1000)^2.667*(S/100)^0.5/(3.211*n)*1000 (L/s)

C : runoff coefficient tf: time of flow in pipe (minute) D: pipe size (mm)

I : rainfall intensity (mm/hr) tf = L/60V S: slope (grade) of pipe (%)

A : area (ha) ti = 10 n: roughness coeffiecient

Area Section Accum. Peak Flow Length N.D. Pipe Slope Qcap. V Actual

From To Area A "C" "AC" "AC" ti tc "I" Q L D Mat'l S (full) (full) tf Q/Qcap. Velocity

ID (ha) (ha) (ha) (Min.) (Min.) (mm/hr) (L/s) (m) (mm) (%) (L/s) (m/s) (Min.) (m/s)

MH1 MH2 1.00 0.70 0.700 0.700 10.00 10.30 113.309 220.324 50.0 375 Concrete 3.00% 303.681 2.750 0.30 73% 3.025

MH2 Headwall 0.97 0.70 0.679 1.379 10.30 10.45 111.971 428.911 20.0 525 Concrete 1.25% 480.824 2.221 0.15 89% 2.532

Site

Storm Sewer Hydraulic Design Sheetfor

Pipe

Rational Formula:

Location Runoff

The City of Waterloo

11-Apr-17

12-Apr-17

ME_V0117 K:\Projects\1304\60-Design\1304.STM.xlsx Page 1 of Pages


Appendix D: Agency Correspondence

Date: March 9, 2017 File #: E18-10/WA

Chris Togeretz, P.Eng. Meritech Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North, Suite 202 Cambridge, ON N1R 6Z2 t. 519.623.1140 x214 e. [email protected] Dear: Chris Re: 2050 University Ave E., Waterloo Please find the results of the modeling simulations for boundary conditions requested on February 16, 2017. The results included a figure showing the locations of the nodes from the Region’s model. Attached are a series of spreadsheets containing results for Average Day, Maximum Day demands and available fire flows for node JCT_71325 located at the intersection of Atlantic Blvd. and Whitecap Ave. The diurnal 24 hour demand distribution accounts for the minimum hour and peak hour peaking factors. The minimum hourly demand on the average day represents the minimum hour, and the maximum hourly demand on the maximum day represents the peak hour. Demands as applied to nodes:

Node Pressure Zone Elevation

Employment Demand (L/s)

Average Day

Maximum Day

JCT_71325 Wat 4 329.00 mASL 2.0 2.86

A fire flow analysis shows the maximum flow available at JCT_71325 is 166.9 L/s with a design pressure of 14.0 m during the maximum day scenario while maintaining the minimum design pressure of 14 m (140 kPa) at all nodes within the pressure zone. If you have any questions, please contact me. Kevin Dolishny P.Eng. Senior Project Engineer, Servicing and Development Planning t. 519.575.4757 x 3862 e-mail: [email protected]

AvgDayMaxDay

Wat 4 Infowater

JCT_71325 Average Day 24 Hour Simulation JCT_71325 Maximum Day 24 Hour Simulation

Time Demand (L/s) Head (m) Pressure (m) Time Demand (L/s) Head (m) Pressure (m)00:00 hrs 1.86 379.27 50.27 00:00 hrs 2.75 377.72 48.72

01:00 hrs 1.76 379.81 50.81 01:00 hrs 2.63 378.52 49.52

02:00 hrs 1.40 382.08 53.08 02:00 hrs 1.86 379.26 50.26

03:00 hrs 1.24 382.18 53.18 03:00 hrs 1.80 379.73 50.73

04:00 hrs 1.20 382.76 53.76 04:00 hrs 2.00 379.50 50.50

05:00 hrs 1.34 382.96 53.96 05:00 hrs 2.14 379.55 50.55

06:00 hrs 1.48 381.96 52.96 06:00 hrs 3.37 378.89 49.89

07:00 hrs 1.20 380.00 51.00 07:00 hrs 3.46 377.32 48.32

08:00 hrs 1.52 378.22 49.22 08:00 hrs 3.43 376.39 47.39

09:00 hrs 2.52 377.95 48.95 09:00 hrs 5.00 377.73 48.73

10:00 hrs 2.62 377.67 48.67 10:00 hrs 5.18 377.82 48.82

11:00 hrs 2.92 377.31 48.31 11:00 hrs 5.23 377.67 48.67

12:00 hrs 3.00 377.18 48.18 12:00 hrs 5.55 376.69 47.69

13:00 hrs 2.92 377.09 48.09 13:00 hrs 4.15 376.03 47.03

14:00 hrs 2.90 377.07 48.07 14:00 hrs 2.00 376.07 47.07

15:00 hrs 2.78 377.07 48.07 15:00 hrs 3.03 375.98 46.98

16:00 hrs 2.62 377.05 48.05 16:00 hrs 1.72 376.23 47.23

17:00 hrs 2.48 377.94 48.94 17:00 hrs 1.32 376.25 47.25

18:00 hrs 2.16 378.05 49.05 18:00 hrs 1.14 375.26 46.26

19:00 hrs 1.88 378.95 49.95 19:00 hrs 1.40 376.44 47.44

20:00 hrs 1.60 378.26 49.26 20:00 hrs 1.69 374.61 45.61

21:00 hrs 1.50 378.49 49.49 21:00 hrs 1.89 376.41 47.41

22:00 hrs 1.56 378.71 49.71 22:00 hrs 2.83 377.65 48.65

23:00 hrs 1.60 379.09 50.09 23:00 hrs 3.06 377.42 48.42

Average Day HGL: 379.05 Maximum Day HGL: 377.30

Minimum Hour: 382.96 Peak Hour: 374.61

2050 University Ave E Waterloo results 3/8/2017

Hydrant Curve

Available Flow (L/s)

Residual Pressure (m)

Fire Flow Analysis

0.0 47.8 Fire Flow Node: JCT_7132510.0 47.5 Design Flow (L/s): 166.920.0 47.0 Design Pressure (m): 14.030.0 46.140.0 45.150.0 43.860.0 42.3 Design Flow: The final adjusted flow at the node to maintain the minimum design70.0 40.6 pressure (14m (140 kPa)) at ALL locations within the pressure zone.80.0 38.790.0 36.6 Design Pressure: The lowest allowable pressure at the node to maintain the minimum design

100.0 34.3 pressure (14m (140 kPa)) at ALL locations within the pressure zone.110.0 31.8120.0 29.1 Critical Node ID: The constraining node within the pressure zone that drops to the minimum design130.0 26.3 pressure of (14m (140 kPa)) during the design flow.140.0 23.2150.0 19.9160.0 16.5166.9 14.0

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 160.0 180.0

Pre

ssu

re (

m)

Flow (L/s)

Maximum Allowable Flow

2050 University Ave E Waterloo results 3/8/2017

University Ave E

University Ave E

Atlantic Blvd

Angler Way

New Hampshire St

Whitecap Ave New Hampshire St

New Hampshire St

Atlantic Blvd

Whitecap Ave

PPE_79594

PPE_79276

PPE_80823

PPE_79734

PPE_76075

PPE_76666

PPE_78183

PPE_78437

PPE_77079

PPE_73916

PPE_73984

PPE_80079

PPE_80550

PPE_74080

PPE_74075

TRANSPORTATION ANDENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESWater Services150 Frederick StreetKitchener ON Canada N2G 4J3Telephone: (519) 575-4426Fax: (519) 575-4452www.regionofwaterloo.ca

0 50 100 150 20025Meters

[Tim

e: 3:1

0:00 P

M D

ate: 3

/8/20

17Do

cume

nt Pa

th: I:\

InfoW

ater\M

odeli

ng R

eque

sts\20

17\M

eritec

h\184

-186 E

rb St

E\20

50 U

nivers

ity Av

e E_W

at_All

_Pipe

s_20

1701

20.m

xdAu

thor: h

sjohn

LegendSubject Site

JunctionTYPE

ActiveDomain

TankTYPE^ Active^ Domain

ReservoirTYPE> Active> Domain

PumpTYPEM Active

M DomainValveTYPE

A Active

A DomainPipeTYPE

ActiveDomainHighwayRegionalLocal Private ProposedSubject Site

JCT_72417

2050 University Ave E Waterloo

Subject Site


Appendix E: Pre-Consultation Minutes

Integrated Planning & Public Works

Planning Approvals

November 24, 2016

Sarah Code GSP Group 72 Victoria Street South, Suite 201 Kitchener, ON, N2G 4Y9 RE: 2050 University Avenue East

Dear Sarah:

Thank you for attending the pre-application consultation meeting held on November 14, 2016 to discuss your proposal for

a Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the redevelopment of the above noted lands with a hospice.

In order for the City to consider your application complete, and in accordance with the City’s Official Plan, the following

must be submitted:

1. A cover letter, outlining the nature of the application, details of the pre-application consultation meetings with

City staff and the contents of the complete submission;

2. Three (3) signed copies of the completed Zoning By-law Amendment Application Form;

3. A Zoning By-law Amendment fee of $23,852;

4. Two (2) sign deposit fees of $317 made payable to the City of Waterloo;

5. A Region of Waterloo Zoning By-law Amendment fee of $1000, payable to the Region of Waterloo;

6. One (1) copy of the Owner Authorization Form, from the land owner authorizing you to act on their behalf;

7. One (1) signed copy of the Permission to Enter Form (enclosed), authorizing City staff to enter onto the subject

lands for the purposes of evaluating the application;

8. Six (6) copies of a completed Environmental Site Screening Questionnaire (enclosed);

9. Twenty-five (25) copies of the Site Plan (11 x 17) + three (3) full size copies. The Site Plan should show the location

of the required 15 metre buffer from the adjacent watercourse;

10. Ten (10) copies of the Planning Justification Report, which should include an assessment of the policies in the

Provincial Policy Statement, Places to Grow, Regional Official Plan, and City of Waterloo Official Plan, and a

description of a proposed zone category;

11. Ten (10) copies of a Transportation Analysis that:

a) Assesses AM/PM transportation peaks for weekdays and weekends,

b) Includes a functional design of the right-of-way used to access the property. The functional design should

assess how the right-of-way should be designed to comply with municipal road standards. It should also

consider:

Pavement markings;

Signage requirements; and

Minimum road widths for snow clearance.

12. Ten (10) copies of a Stationary Noise Assessment to address possible noise impacts from on-site noise sources

(i.e., heating and ventilation equipment) associated with the proposed use, and any other noise sources deemed

appropriate for inclusion by a qualified noise consultant. The study should include an assessment of the noise

Integrated Planning & Public Works

Planning Approvals

impacts from the on-site sources on: noise-sensitive receptors on-site (from building to building), the proposed

gardens/outdoor amenity areas, and off-site receptors. A signed Consultant Statutory Declaration and

Owner/Authorized Agent Statement must be submitted in support of and with the study;

13. Fifteen (15) copies of a Functional Servicing Report and Water Distribution Study; and

14. Digital copies of the above noted plans and studies.

Once the above noted information has been received to the satisfaction of Integrated Planning and Public Works, a letter

will be sent to your attention advising you that your application is considered complete and that it will be processed in

accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act and the City of Waterloo Official Plan.

If you require further clarification with respect to the Development Engineering requirements please contact Francis

Reyes, Engineering Services at 519-747-8741. If you require further clarification with respect to the Noise Study

requirements, please contact Wendy Fisher at the Region of Waterloo.

Lastly, please note that Grand River Conservation Authority (GRCA) has identified that the fifteen (15) metre buffer is

required from the top of bank on the adjacent watercourse. In addition, a portion of the property is located within the

regulatory allowance of a watercourse and wetland. Any development within this regulated area would require a permit

from the GRCA. For more information please contact Andrea Terella at 519-621-2763 x. 2292.

Again, thank you for participating in the City’s pre-application consultation process, should you have any questions

regarding the City’s requirements, please contact the undersigned at 519-514-0224 or [email protected].

Sincerely,

Natalie Stopar,

Zoning/Committee Coordinator

cc: Joel Cotter, City of Waterloo

Francis Reyes, City of Waterloo

Wendy Fisher, Region of Waterloo

Meritech Engineering 1315 Bishop Street North Suite 202 Cambridge ON N1R 6Z2 t 519.623.1140 f 519.623.7334

Servicing Strategy Report - waterloo.ca

Documents

Transcript of Servicing Strategy Report - waterloo.ca