Serrated lesions - WordPress.com · • Snover et al., Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and...
Embed Size (px)
Transcript of Serrated lesions - WordPress.com · • Snover et al., Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and...

Serrated lesions
Prof. Luigi TornilloPathoBasic
5.5.2015

• Introduction• Serrated lesions
– Morphology– Molecular pathology
• Clinical meaning

„Initial presumptions ... were that thediagnostic pathology associated withbowel cancer screening would berelatively straightforward . Nevertheless , this has shown not to be the case“
Shepherd NA, Griggs RKL, Mod Pathol, 2015

Serrated Polyps : Classification(s )
• WHO– Hyperplastic Polyps
• Microvesicular (MVHP)• Goblet cell rich (GCHP)• Mucin poor (MPHP)
– Sessile serratedadenoma/polyp (SSA/P)
• Without dysplasia• With dysplasia
– Traditional serratedadenoma (TSA)
• Riddell– Hyperplastic Polyps
• Microvesicular (MVHP)• Goblet cell rich (GCHP)• Mucin poor (MPHP)
– Sessile serrated polyp(aka SSA/P)
– Serrated polyp withdysplasia
• Sessile serrated polypswith dysplasia
– Serrated dysplasia– Adenomatous dysplasia
• Traditional serratedadenoma (TSA)
– Serrated polyp, unclassified

„It is recommended that... serrated adenoma (without a modifier) should not be used “
WHO, 2010

Bateman, AC, JCP 2014

Serrated polyps : risk factors
Haque et al., Dig Dis Sci, 2014

Hyperplastic polyps
• Small, < 5mm, very rare >10mm
• Distal colon , rectum (90%)
• 25-30% all polyps• 3 variants
– MVHP– GCHP– MPHP

Microvesicular hyperplasticpolyps
• Straight crypts , carrot shaped• Serration at the top• Immature/neuroendocrine cells base• Stellate crypts• Microvesicular mucin droplets



Goblet cell hyperplastic polyps
• Smaller• Least serrated• Wider crypts• Goblet cells• Probably what we call „hyperplastic
aspect“


Mucin poor hyperplastic polyps
• Very rare• Degenerated
MVHP?• Goblet cell and
mucin lacking• Regenerative
atypia

HP: molecular pathology
• MVHP– BRAFV600E (75%)
– KRASwt (90%)
– CIMP+
• GCHP– BRAFwt (all)
– KRASG12X (50%)
– CIMP-

„There is evidence that the reproducibilityof diagnosis of SSLs is poor, that is , thatsignificant inter-observer variability existsin the differentiation of these lesions fromother polyps “
Bateman JCP, 2014

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp(SSA/P, SSL)
• 9% (15%?) of all polyps
• More frequent on theright (75%)
• Larger (15-20% > 10 mm)
• Mucus

SSA: endoscopic appearance
Bordaçar et al., Dig Liv Dis 2015

Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp(SSA/P, SSL): histology
• Serrated appearance at the bottom• Disordered growth of the crypts• T-shaped , boot-shaped
– WHO: at least 3 crypts; prob. 1 crypt
• Inverted maturation• Crypt dilatation
O‘Brien et al et al, Histopathology, 2015





SSA: Dysplasia ?
• „Serrated “ dysplasia– Often focal– Vesicular nuclei, small nucleoli– Often low -grade– Grading not needed– Progression
• Conventional dysplasia




SSA/P: Molecular pathology
• Without dysplasia– BRAFV600E (up to 80%)– CIMP-H 50%– KRASG12X rare (1%)
• With dysplasia (advanced )– Inactivation - Methylation
• MLH1• CTNBB1• MGMT
Bettington M, et al., Histopathology, 2013O‘Brien M, Histopathology, 2015

SSA: progression
• SSA do have preneoplastic potential
• SSA progression to CRC: more rapid than „conventional“ adenomas ? Probably methylation
• Large studies missing and datacontroversial

Traditional serrated adenoma (TSA)
• Least frequent serrated polyp (1% of all polyps)
• Distal colon, rectum
• Tubulovillous or villous architecture
• Dysplasia (serrated and conventional)
• Often (50%) mixed with SSL or conventionaladenoma
O‘ Brien M, Histopathology, 2015Chetty R, JCP 2015



„The proportion of a lesion that is requiredto show the characteristic features of a TSA - in contrast to areas showing theappearances of a ‘classical’ adenoma - in order to make a diagnosis of TSA is notclearly defined “
Bateman JCP, 2014

TSA: molecular pathology
• Inhomogeneous– KRASG12X (30%) (adenomatous
dysplasia)– BRAFV600E (50%) (serrated dysplasia)– MGMTmet (50%)– CIMP-H frequent– Progression
O‘ Brien, Histopathology, 2015Chetty, JCP 2015

Serrated polyps : DD
• SSP vs HP– Architectural
features (one crypt)
• TSA vs SSL– Architectural
changes– Villiform architecture– Ectopic crypts
• SSP vs prolapse– Erosions– Ischemic changes– Fibrosis– Fibromuscular
hyperplasia
• SP vs carcinoma– Pseudoinvasion


Serrated polyps : progression
O‘ Brien, Histopathology, 2015

O‘ Brien, Histopathology, 2014

Bettington M, et al., Histopathology, 2013

Interval CRC (6 mo – 5ys)
• 5-7% of all cases• Serrated polyps ?
– More frequent right– Sessile difficult resection– MSI rapid growth– BRAFV600E aggressive
Samadder et al, Gastroenterology, 2014

Serrated polyposis
• At least five histologically diagnosedserrated polyps proximal to the sigmoidcolon , of which two are >10 mm in diameter
• Any number of serrated polyps occurringproximal to the sigmoid colon in an individual who has a first degree relative with serrated polyposis
• More than 20 hyperplastic polyps of anysize but distributed throughout the colon
Snover et al., WHO, 2010

SSA: surveillance
Bordaçar et al., Dig Liv Dis 2015

Literature• Snover et al., Serrated polyps of the colon and rectum and serrated
polyposis , in Tumors of the Digestive System , Lyon, IARC, 2010, 160-65• Lewin, Weinstein and Riddell‘s Gastrointestinal Pathology and its Clinical
Implications , 1352-75• O‘Brien M et al., Colorectal serrated pathway cancers and precursors ,
Histopathology, 2015; 66:49–65.• Bettington M et al, The serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma: current
concepts and challenges, Histopathology, 2013; 62:367–386• Batts, V, The pathology of serrated colorectal neoplasia: practic al answers
for common questions. Mod Pathol, 2015;28:S80-S87• Bettington M et al, Critical Appraisal of the Diagnosis of the Sessile
Serrated Adenoma , Am J Surg Pathol, 2014;38:158-66• Chetty R , Traditional serrated adenomas (TSAs) admixed with oth er
serrated (so-called precursor) polyps and conventional a denomas: a frequent occurrence, J Clin Pathol 2015;68:270–273.
• Haque TR et al., Risk Factors for Serrated Polyps of the Colorectum, DigDis Scie 59:2874–2889
• Rau TT et al., Defined morphological criteria allow reliable diagnosis o f colorectal serrated polyps and predict polyp genetics. Virchows Arch2014:464:663–672