Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

32
. Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3 This class has been edited from Nir Friedman’s lecture which is available at www.cs.huji.ac.il /~nir. Changes made by Dan Geiger, then by Shlomo Moran. Background Readings : Chapters 2.5, 2.7 in the text book, Biological Sequence Analysis, Durbin et al., 2001. Chapters 3.5.1- 3.5.3, 3.6.2 in Introduction to Computational Molecular Biology, Setubal and Meidanis, 1997.

description

Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3. Background Readings : Chapters 2.5, 2.7 in the text book, Biological Sequence Analysis , Durbin et al., 2001. Chapters 3.5.1- 3.5.3, 3.6.2 in Introduction to Computational Molecular Biology , Setubal and Meidanis, 1997. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

Page 1: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

.

Sequence Alignment IILecture #3

This class has been edited from Nir Friedman’s lecture which is available at www.cs.huji.ac.il/~nir. Changes made by Dan Geiger, then by Shlomo Moran.

Background Readings: Chapters 2.5, 2.7 in the text book, Biological Sequence Analysis, Durbin et al., 2001.Chapters 3.5.1- 3.5.3, 3.6.2 in Introduction to Computational Molecular Biology, Setubal and Meidanis, 1997.

Page 2: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

2

Reminder

Last class we discussed dynamic programming algorithms for

global alignment local alignment

All of these assumed a scoring rule:

that determines the quality of perfect matches, substitutions, insertions, and deletions.

}){(}){(:

Page 3: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

3

Alignment in Real Life

One of the major uses of alignments is to find sequences in a “database.”

The current protein database contains about 100 millions (i.e.,108) residues ! So searching a 1000 long target sequence requires to evaluate about 1011 matrix cells which will take about three hours in the rate of 10 millions evaluations per second.

Quite annoying when, say, one thousand target sequences need to be searched because it will take about four months to run.

Page 4: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

4

Heuristic Fast Search

Instead, most searches rely on heuristic procedures These are not guaranteed to find the best match Sometimes, they will completely miss a high-scoring

match

We now describe the main ideas used by the best known of these heuristic procedures.

Page 5: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

5

Basic Intuition

Almost all heuristic search procedures are based on the observation that real-life matches often contain long strings with gap-less matches.

These heuristic try to find significant gap-less matches and then extend them.

Page 6: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

6

Banded DP

Suppose that we have two strings s[1..n] and t[1..m] such that nm

If the optimal alignment of s and t has few gaps, then path of the alignment will be close to diagonal

s

t

Page 7: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

7

Banded DP

To find such a path, it suffices to search in a diagonal region of the matrix.

If the diagonal band has width k, then the dynamic programming step takes O(kn).

Much faster than O(n2) of standard DP.s

t k

V[i+1, i+k/2 +1]Out of range

V[i, i+k/2+1]V[i,i+k/2]

Note that for diagonals i-j = constant.

Page 8: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

8

Banded DP for local alignment

Problem: Where is the banded diagonal ? It need not be the main diagonal when looking for a good local alignment.

How do we select which subsequences to align using banded DP?

s

tk

We heuristically find potential diagonals and evaluate them using Banded DP.

This is the main idea of FASTA.

Page 9: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

9

Finding Potential Diagonals

Suppose that we have a relatively long gap-less match

AGCGCCATGGATTGAGCGA

TGCGACATTGATCGACCTA Can we find “clues” that will let us find it quickly? Each such sequence defines a potential diagonal (which is

then evaluated using Banded DP.

Page 10: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

10

Signature of a Match

s

t

Assumption: good matches contain several “patches” of perfect matches

AGCGCCATGGATTGAGCTATGCGACATTGATCGACCTA

Since this is a gap-less alignment, all perfect match regionsshould be on one diagonal

Page 11: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

11

FASTA-finding ungapped matches

Input: strings s and t, and a parameter ktup Find all pairs (i,j) such that s[i..i+ktup]=t[j..j+ktup] Locate sets of pairs that are on the same diagonal

By sorting according to the difference i-j Compute the score for the diagonal that contains all these

pairs

s

t

Page 12: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

12

FASTA-finding ungapped matches

Input: strings s and t, and a parameter ktup Find all pairs (i,j) such that s[i..i+ktup]=t[j..j+ktup]

Step one: prepare an index of the database such that given a sequence of length ktup, one gets the list of positions. (Linear time).

Step two: run on all sequences of size ktup on the query sequence. ( time depends on # of positions).

s

t

Page 13: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

13

FASTA- using banded DP

Final steps: List the highest scoring diagonal matches Run banded DP on the region containing any high scoring

diagonal (say with width 12).Hence, the algorithm may combine some diagonals into

gapped matches (in the example below combine diagonals 2 and 3).

s

t 3

2

1

Page 14: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

14

FASTA- practical choices

Some implementation choices /tricks have not been explicated herein.

s

t

Most applications of FASTA use very small ktup (1-2 for proteins, and 4-6 for DNA).

Higher values are faster, yielding less diagonal to search around, but increase the chance to miss the optimal local alignment.

Page 15: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

15

FASTA-summary

Input: strings s and t, and a parameter ktup = 1,2,4,5, or 6 depending on the application.

Output: A highly scored local alignment

1. Find pairs of matching substrings s[i..i+ktup]=t[j..j+ktup]

2. Extend to ungapped diagonals3. Extend to gapped matches using banded DP

Page 16: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

16

BLAST Overview(Basic Local Alignment Search Tool)

Input: strings s and t, and a parameter T = threshold valueOutput: A highly scored local alignment

Definition: Two strings s and t of length k are a high scoring pair (HSP) if d(s,t) > T (usually consider un-gapped alignments only).

1. Find high scoring pairs of substrings such that d(s,t) > T These words serve as seeds for finding longer matches

2. Extend to ungapped diagonals (as in FASTA)3. Extend to gapped matches

Page 17: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

17

BLAST Overview (cont.)

Step 1: Find high scoring pairs of substrings such that d(s,t) > T (The seeds):

Find all strings of length k which score at least T with substrings of s in a gapless alignment (k = 4 for proteins, 11 for DNA)

(note: possibly, not all k-words must be tested, e.g. when such a word scores less than T with itself).

Find in t all exact matches with each of the above strings.

Page 18: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

18

Extending Potential Matches

s

t

Once a seed is found, BLAST attempts to find a local alignment that extends the seed.

Seeds on the same diagonal are combined (as in FASTA), then extended as far as possible in a greedy manner.

During the extension phase, the search stops when the score passes below some lower bound computed by BLAST (to save time).

Page 19: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

19

Where do scoring rules come from ?

We have defined an additive scoring function by specifying a function ( , ) such that

(x,y) is the score of replacing x by y (x,-) is the score of deleting x (-,x) is the score of inserting x

But how do we come up with the “correct” score ?

Answer: By encoding experience of what are similar sequences for the task at hand. Similarity depends on time, evolution trends, and sequence types.

Page 20: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

20

Why use probability to define and/or interpret a scoring function ?

• Similarity is probabilistic in nature because biological changes like mutation, recombination, and selection, are not deterministic.

• We could answer questions such as:• How probable two sequences are similar?• Is the similarity found significant or random?• How to change a similarity score when, say, mutation rate of a specific area on the chromosome becomes known ?

Page 21: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

21

A Probabilistic Model

For now, we will focus on alignment without indels. For now, we assume each position (nucleotide

/amino-acid) is independent of other positions. We consider two options:

M: the sequences are Matched (related)

R: the sequences are Random (unrelated)

Page 22: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

22

Unrelated Sequences

Our random model of unrelated sequences is simple Each position is sampled independently from a

distribution over the alphabet We assume there is a distribution q() that

describes the probability of letters in such positions.

Then:

i

itqisqRntnsP ])[(])[()|]..1[],..1[(

Page 23: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

23

Related Sequences

We assume that each pair of aligned positions (s[i],t[i]) evolved from a common ancestor

Let p(a,b) be a distribution over pairs of letters. p(a,b) is the probability that some ancestral letter

evolved into this particular pair of letters.

i

itispMntnsP ])[],[()|]..1[],..1[(

Page 24: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

24

Odd-Ratio Test for Alignment

i

i

i

itqisq

itisp

itqisq

itisp

RtsP

MtsPQ

])[(])[(

])[],[(

])[(])[(

])[],[(

)|,(

)|,(

If Q > 1, then the two strings s and t are more likely tobe related (M) than unrelated (R).

If Q < 1, then the two strings s and t are more likely tobe unrelated (R) than related (M).

Page 25: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

25

Score(s[i],t[i])

Log Odd-Ratio Test for AlignmentTaking logarithm of Q yields

])[(])[(

])[],[(log

])[(])[(

])[],[(log

)|,(

)|,(log

itqisq

itisp

itqisq

itisp

RtsP

MtsP

ii

If log Q > 0, then s and t are more likely to be related.If log Q < 0, then they are more likely to be unrelated.

How can we relate this quantity to a score function ?

Page 26: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

26

Probabilistic Interpretation of Scores

We define the scoring function via

Then, the score of an alignment is the log-ratio between the two models:

Score > 0 Model is more likely

Score < 0 Random is more likely

)()(),(

log),(bqaq

bapba

Page 27: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

27

Modeling Assumptions

It is important to note that this interpretation depends on our modeling assumption!!

For example, if we assume that the letter in each position depends on the letter in the preceding position, then the likelihood ratio will have a different form.

Page 28: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

28

Estimating Probabilities

Suppose we are given a long string s[1..n] of letters from

We want to estimate the distribution q(·) that generated the sequence

How should we go about this?

We build on the theory of parameter estimation in statistics using either maximum likelihood estimation or the Bayesian approach .

Page 29: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

29

Estimating q()

Suppose we are given a long string s[1..n] of letters from

s can be the concatenation of all sequences in our database

We want to estimate the distribution q()

That is, q is defined per letter

a

Nn

i

aaqisqsqL )(])[()|(1

Likelihood function:

Page 30: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

30

Estimating q() (cont.)

How do we define q?

n

Naq a)( ||

1)(

n

Naq a

a

Nn

i

aaqisqsqL )(])[()|(1

Likelihood function:

ML parameters

(Maximum Likelihood)

MAP parameters(Maximum A posteriori Probability)

Page 31: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

31

Estimating p(·,·)

Intuition: Find pair of aligned sequences s[1..n], t[1..n], Estimate probability of pairs:

Again, s and t can be the concatenation of many aligned pairs from the database

n

Nbap ba,),(

Number of times a is

aligned with b in (s,t)

Page 32: Sequence Alignment II Lecture #3

32

Problems in Estimating p(·,·)

How do we find pairs of aligned sequences? How far is the ancestor ?

earlier divergence low sequence similarity later divergence high sequence similarity

Does one letter mutate to the other or are they both mutations of a common ancestor having yet another residue/nucleotide acid ?