SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 2 2019-201 SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 2 2019-20 Report date:...
17
1 SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 2 2019-20 Report date: 7 th April 2020 Start date: 20 th March 2020 Stop date: 5 th April 2020 Number of invitees: 100 Number of responses: 15 Invitee response rate: 15% Student Satisfaction % Description 75%-100% Provides high quality educational experiences over time with action plans in place for minor problems. 40%-<75% Provides some quality experiences, but overall below the expected standard. 0%-<40% Consistently below the expected standard. Requires significant improvement. Please note: Overall satisfaction is calculated using the number of 'positive responses' received per site. A positive response is a rating of ‘Above average’, ‘Good’ or ‘Excellent’ on the Likert scale. Teaching in this module was affected by the Covid-19 outbreak and subsequent lockdown Central site No. of responses Royal Free 5 UCLH 6 Whittington 4 DGH No. of responses Barnet 4 Basildon 0 Lister 1 Luton & Dunstable 6 North Middlesex 1 Watford 3 UCL Medical School Quality Assurance Unit
Transcript of SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 2 2019-201 SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 2 2019-20 Report date:...
-
1
SEQ Report Year 5 Module A Block 2
2019-20 Report date: 7th April 2020 Start date: 20th March 2020 Stop date: 5th April 2020 Number of invitees: 100 Number of responses: 15 Invitee response rate: 15%
Student Satisfaction % Description
75%-100% Provides high quality educational experiences over time with action plans in place for minor problems.
40%-
-
2
No. of responses
(n=15)
Overall satisfaction 87%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 2
Above average 1
Good 11
Excellent 1
N/A 0
Total 15
How would you rate Module 5A overall?
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
3
No. of responses
(n=15)
Overall satisfaction 73%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 1
Poor 1
Below average 2
Above average 9
Good 1
Excellent 1
N/A 0
Total 15
How would you rate Core Teaching Week?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
4
Royal Free
(n=5) UCLH (n=6)
Whittington (n=4)
Overall satisfaction 100% 100% 100%
0
1
2
3
4
5
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Royal Free UCLH Whittington
Site/Rating Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Royal Free 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 5
UCLH 0 0 0 0 2 4 0 6
Whittington 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 4
Total 0 0 0 3 5 7 0 15
How would you rate your Paediatrics placement (Central site)?
-
5
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Royal Free
Take histories 0 0 0 1 1 0
Examine patients 0 0 0 1 1 0
Present cases 0 0 0 2 0 0
UCLH
Take histories 0 1 3 1 0 0
Examine patients 0 1 4 0 0 0
Present cases 0 4 0 1 0 0
Whittington
Take histories 0 2 2 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 4 0 0 0 0
Present cases 0 3 1 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following
during your Paediatrics placement (Central site)?
-
6
0
1
2
3
4
5
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Barnet Lister Luton & Dunstable North Middlesex Watford
Barnet (n=4)
Lister (n=1)
Luton & Dunstable
(n=6)
North Middlesex
(n=1)
Watford (n=3)
Overall satisfaction
75% 100% 50% 100% 100%
Site/Rating Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Barnet 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 4
Lister 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1
Luton & Dunstable 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 6
North Middlesex 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
Watford 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3
Total 1 1 2 1 5 5 0 15
How would you rate your Paediatrics placement (DGH)?
-
7
0 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-10 >10
Barnet
Take histories 0 0 0 1 1 0
Examine patients 0 0 0 1 1 0
Present cases 0 1 0 0 1 0
Basildon
No answers received.
Lister
Take histories 0 0 0 1 0 0
Examine patients 0 0 0 1 0 0
Present cases 0 0 0 1 0 0
Luton & Dunstable
Take histories 1 0 4 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 2 3 0 0 0
Present cases 0 3 2 0 0 0
North Middlesex
No answers received.
Watford
Take histories 0 0 3 0 0 0
Examine patients 0 0 3 0 0 0
Present cases 0 0 3 0 0 0
How many times per week, on average, did you do the following
during your Paediatrics placement (DGH)?
-
8
Paediatrics (Central site)
(n=11) Paediatrics (DGH)
(n=11)
Overall satisfaction 100% 91%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Paediatrics (Central site) Paediatrics (DGH)
Placement Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Paediatrics (Central site) 0 0 0 2 7 2 0 11
Paediatrics (DGH) 0 0 1 0 6 4 0 11
Total 0 0 1 2 13 6 0 22
How would you rate your experience of being able to take histories from
patients during your Paediatrics placements?
-
9
Paediatrics (Central site)
(n=11) Paediatrics (DGH)
(n=11)
Overall satisfaction 91% 82%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Paediatrics (Central site) Paediatrics (DGH)
Placement Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Paediatrics (Central site) 0 0 1 1 8 1 0 11
Paediatrics (DGH) 0 0 2 1 4 4 0 11
Total 0 0 3 2 12 5 0 22
How would you rate your experience of being able to examine patients during
your Paediatrics placements?
-
10
Paediatrics (Central site)
(n=11) Paediatrics (DGH)
(n=11)
Overall satisfaction 82% 82%
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Very poor Poor Below average Aboveaverage
Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
Paediatrics (Central site) Paediatrics (DGH)
Placement Very poor
Poor Below
average Above
average Good Excellent N/A Total
Paediatrics (Central site) 0 0 2 3 5 1 0 11
Paediatrics (DGH) 0 1 1 2 4 3 0 11
Total 0 1 3 5 9 4 0 22
How would you rate your experience of being able to discuss your
management planning and clinical reasoning during your Paediatrics
placements?
-
11
No. of responses
(n=15)
Overall satisfaction 50%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 2
Below average 3
Above average 2
Good 1
Excellent 2
N/A 5
Total 15
How would you rate Child and adolescent mental health (CAMH)?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
12
No. of responses
(n=15)
Overall satisfaction 43%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 1
Below average 3
Above average 2
Good 1
Excellent 0
N/A 8
Total 15
How would you rate the Pathology teaching?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
13
No. of responses
(n=15)
Overall satisfaction 82%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 2
Above average 6
Good 3
Excellent 0
N/A 4
Total 15
How would you rate the Ethics and law teaching?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
14
No. of responses
(n=9)
Overall satisfaction 100%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 0
Above average 1
Good 4
Excellent 3
N/A 1
Total 9
How would you rate the access to computer/IT/library resources?
0
1
2
3
4
5
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
15
No. of responses
(n=9)
Overall satisfaction 100%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 0
Above average 3
Good 5
Excellent 1
N/A 0
Total 9
How would you rate the quality of the feedback you received on the
assessment?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
16
No. of responses
(n=9)
Overall satisfaction 100%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 0
Above average 1
Good 4
Excellent 4
N/A 0
Total 9
How would you rate the module as an educational experience?
0
1
2
3
4
5
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
-
17
No. of responses
(n=9)
Overall satisfaction 100%
Rating No. of responses
Very poor 0
Poor 0
Below average 0
Above average 1
Good 5
Excellent 3
N/A 0
Total 9
How would you rate the module in terms of your clinical experience?
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Very poor Poor Below averageAbove average Good Excellent N/A
No
. of
resp
on
ses
