Senna Salt Stress

download Senna Salt Stress

of 9

Transcript of Senna Salt Stress

  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    1/9

    Journal

    of

    Experimental Botany, Vol. 28, No. 103, pp. 4 84-492, April 1977

    Some Primary Featuresof Salt Tolerancein Senna

    Cassia acutifolia)

    ALI T. AYOUB

    Hudeiba

    Research

    Station, P.O. Box

    31,

    Ed-Damer, Sudan

    Received 1March1976

    A B S T R A C T

    Studies

    on the

    germination

    of

    Cassia acutifolia (senna) seeds indicated that they were highly

    tolera nt of salinities up to 160 m mhos cm

    1

    , and50per cent reduction in germination occu rred

    at about 20-0 mmhos cm

    1

    .Airtemperaturehad a significant effect onsenna germinationat

    substrate salinities between 10-0and25-0 mm hos cm

    1

    .

    Seedling growth was more sensitivetosalinityandalkalinity tha nthegermination stage.

    Yo ung pla nt surv ival an d tota l pod yield were significantly reduced insoilsalinities higher th an

    11-0 minhoa cm

    1

    , an d this was more pronounced when plan ts were irrigatedatshort intervals

    with salinewaters.The sensitivity of senna to higher levels of salinities was correlated with the

    higher rate of chloride accum ulation in the tissue resulting in specific chloride injury. However,

    the possibilityofsodium injury cannot be excluded.

    I N T R O D U C T I O N

    In a previous paper (Ayoub, 1975), the importance of senna Cassia acutifolia)as a

    promising irrigated cash crop was put forward. The crop requires high temperatures

    and an abundance of sunlight (Gupta, 1971), and these conditions prevail in the

    more arid parts of the Sudan where soil salinity and alkalinity problems may be

    important. A study was, therefore, undertaken on the effects of salt levels, salt

    types, and soil alkalinity on senna germination, vegetative growth, yield, and

    mineral composition. Some environmental factors which may effect salt tolerance

    by senna, such as watering interval and air temperature, were also included in

    these studies. The present paper reports some primary features of these studies.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Germination

    studies

    Germ Lnation expe rimen ts were carried out i n 10 -cm-diameter P etri dishes in asinglerandomized

    design with 11 levelsof NaCl solutions (0-40-0 mmhos cm

    1

    ) replicated four times.Ineach

    sterilized Petr i dish, 10 hea lthy surface-disinfected (HgCla) senna seeds were placed on

    a

    filter

    paper bed, covered with another sheetoffilter paper,andsoaked with 10 mlof the specified

    solution. This volume was sufficient to satu ratethefilter papers a ndtopartially immersethe

    seeds.ThePe tri dishes were coveredandplacedin thedarkin an incubator maintainedat

    30 2

    C.

    The germination coim t was taken every 24h.

    Interaction o f

    temperature

    an d salinity

    on germination

    The germination tests were carried out

    in

    Petri dishes

    as

    described above. Salt levels used

    were 0,5 0, 8-3,

    16-3,

    24-5,and33-6mmhos cm

    1

    NaClat25 Cand each testwasreplicated four

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,2014

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org

    /

    Downlo

    adedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    2/9

    Ayoub Salt

    Tolerance

    in Senna 485

    t imes.

    Replicates were incubated at 12-15, 28-30,

    3235,

    and 40-45

    C

    and germ ination counts

    were made on the 7th day.

    ESP tolerancestudies

    Hud eiba Research Station Farm he avy claysoil(Vertisols) was air-dried, crushed, a nd sieved

    throug h 2 mm mesh. Soils of different exchangeable sodium perce ntage (ESP) levels were pro-

    duced following the method of Chang and Dregne (1955). Final ESP levels obtained were

    approximately 5, 15, 24, 35, 45, and 55.

    These soils were again air-dried, sieved, and 5'5 kg of each soil placed in 21-cm-diameter

    plastic pots and randomized on a ventilated greenhouse bench. Each soil test was replicated

    five times. Ten seeds of senna were sown in each pot and irrigated when necessary with low-

    salt tap water (0-20 mmhos).

    Germination counts were recorded and after a period of 30 d plants were harvested for dry

    matter determinations.

    Effect of

    salt

    types and

    levels on

    plant

    growth

    About 5

    5 kg

    of washed san dy loam

    soil were

    put in

    60

    plastic pots

    21 cm

    diameter) with drain-

    age holes and 10 seeds of senna were sown in each pot. For a period of

    2

    weeks the pots w ere

    irrigated a lternately w ith tap w ater and Hoagland nutrie nt solution after which the seedlings

    were thinned to four plants per pot and 45 pots of uniformly growing plants were selected for

    salt treatments.

    Equal concentrations of NaCl, CaCla, Na2SO4, and an equal mixture of NaCl and CaCl2

    were compared at the levels shown in Table 2. Saline waters were applied gradually to allow

    for osmotic adjustment until the final specified salt level was maintained. The plants were

    harvested after 8 weeks of growth in salt treatm ents and the fresh w eight of the new growth

    and its mineral contents were determined. Observations such

    as

    plan t survival an d leaf shedding

    were also taken.

    On dry ashed plan t m aterial Na and K were determined by a flame photom eter, Ca and Mg

    by titrating with EDTA, and Cl using the AgNOs method (Chapman and Pratt, 1961). Soil

    salinity (EC) was measured following the U.S. Salinity Laboratory method (Richards, 1954).

    All experiments re ported abo ve were repeated a nd com parable results were o btained.

    Frequencyofirrigationwith NaCl onsenna growth

    Seeds of senna were planted in metallic lysimeters with drainage holes at the bottom and

    containin g ab out 130 kg of river silt. The lysimeters used were oil drum s 65 cm high and 60 cm

    in diameter and painted with a sphalt. The experimental design was a factorial combination of

    five concentrations of NaCl (0-2, 2-5, 5-0, 10-0, and 20-0 mmhos cm

    1

    ) and two intervals of

    watering (every

    7

    or 14 d with t he salt solution). These lysim eters, with three replicates, were

    arranged randomly in the open air where daily tempe ratures ranged between 25 and 39 C.

    They were watered w ith ta p w ater whenever necessary until the salt treatm ents were applied.

    Just before applying salt treatments the plants were thinned to eight per lysimeter.

    Salt was applied after

    4

    weeks from sowing in increm ents of

    2-5

    mm hos NaCl in the irrigation

    water every other d ay to allow for osmotic adjustm ent until the plan ts were receiving solutions

    of assigned concentration. Salt concentrations in the soils at harvest are shown in Table

    3

    a s

    mmhos cm

    1

    of saturated extract. The volumes of solutions added were sufficient to allow

    copious drainage and thorough flushing out of the root medium.

    Observations concerning plant survival and development were recorded. Samples of dead

    plants were also taken throughout the duration of the experiment. Pod yields were recorded

    periodically an d a t the termination of the experiment yield com ponents and

    some

    plant charac-

    ters were determined. Leaf samples were also taken for N a a nd Cl analysis.

    R E S U L T S

    Effect and NaCl levels on seed germination

    Senna seed germination never exceeded 75 per cent and under field conditions the

    maximum germination obtainedwasusuallylessthan60per cent. Thislowgermina-

    tion percentage is mainly due to the presence of 'hard' seeds which do not imbibe

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,20

    14

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/

    Downloa

    dedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    3/9

    486

    Ayoub Salt Tolerance in Senna

    100-

    90

    80 -

    70-

    | 6 0

    I 50-

    8

    I 40

    30-

    20-

    10

    0

    4 5 6

    Days from sowing

    FIG. 1. Sen na seed germination at different NaCl levels. The num bers on the g raph are NaCl

    solution conductivities in mmhos cm

    1

    at 25 C.

    water even after 10 d soaking. Laboratory tests have indicated that these seeds

    have an impermeable seed coat. The da ta shown in Fig. 1, presenting germination

    perce ntage in relation t o different salt levels of th e sub stra te, are therefore based on

    germinable seeds.

    Control seeds completed germination on the 7th day. Seed germination was

    satisfactory up to a sa lt level of about 16-0 mm hos cm

    1

    NaCl. Between salt levels

    of 20-0 and 24-0 mm hos c m

    1

    germination was reduced 50 per cent and beyond th e

    salt level of 30-0 mm hos cm

    1

    germination was almost inhibited.

    Interaction of salinity and

    temperature

    on senna germination

    Fig.

    2

    shows the effect of salinity a t different

    ah

    temperatures on senna germina-

    tion. Su bstr ate salinity, ah- tem pera ture, and their intera ctio n highly significantly

    affected senna germ ination . U p to a salinity of6-0mmhos cm

    1

    the re was no differ-

    ence between tem pera tures from 28 to 45 C hi germination percentage. Air tem-

    perature had its greatest effect on germination at salinities between 10-0 and 25-0

    mmhoa cm

    1

    . Fifty per cen t reduction in germ ination occurred a t salinities of abou t

    10-0,

    17 0, and 22-0 mm hos cm

    1

    when air tempe ratures were 40-4 5,32-3 5, and 28-

    30 C, respectively. Senna did not germinate at temperatures below 15 C.

    Effect o f ESP levelson sennagerminationandseedling groioth

    The data

    ha

    Table

    1

    shows th e effect of different E S P levels on senn a seed germina -

    tion and seedling growth. Seed germination was satisfactory up to an ESP level of

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,2014

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org

    /

    Downlo

    adedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    4/9

    Ayovb

    Salt Tolerance

    in

    Senna

    487

    o o

    5-0

    1

    3

    5-0 20-0 25-0

    NsCI levd (mmhos cm

    1

    )

    F i o .

    2. Effect of NaCl levelsa t different a i rt e m p e r a t u r e s o ns e n n a s e ed g e rm i n a t i o n :

    2 8 - 3 0 C ; , 3 2 - 3 5 C ; A A ,4 0 - 4 5C .

    350

    O

    35.

    Bey ond t h a t level some seeds germ inated, b ut m ost of the seedlings died sho rtly

    after that. Seedlings growing

    in

    ESP levels

    of

    25

    or

    more were stunted

    and had

    bleached-yellowish (chlorotic) secondary leaves.

    The

    effect

    of

    ES P was, there-

    fore, m ore pronounced

    at

    the seedling growth stage than during seed germination.

    TABLE 1.Effect of

    exchangeable

    sodium

    percentage

    ESP)

    onsenna seed

    germination

    an d

    seedling

    growth

    E S P

    5

    15

    25

    35

    45

    55

    Relative

    germination (%)

    100-0

    96-3

    88-9

    88-9

    48-2

    33-3

    Relative

    growth (%)

    100-0

    6 0 1

    45-8

    32-8

    25-0

    1 0 0

    Effect of salt types and saltlevels

    P lan t grow th, survival, and mineral composition from the different tre atm ent s as

    obtained

    at

    th e end of the

    8-week

    period of growth are shown in Table

    2.

    Plants receiving additions

    ofC GI2

    were affected more markedly than those re-

    ceiving the correspondinglevelsof NaCl while plant s grown inNa2SO4media showed

    less chan ges

    in

    growth than those grown in NaCl.

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,20

    14

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/

    Downloa

    dedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    5/9

    00

    00

    T A B L E

    2. Effect of

    equal conductances

    o f

    different

    salt types on senna growth,

    survival,

    and m ineral composition

    Sftlt treatments

    Type

    mmhoscm

    1

    ITIM

    Relative

    growth

    Plant

    survival

    Mineral contents (mBq per 100 g dry wt.)

    N a

    Mg

    C a

    Cl

    N o

    salt

    NaCl

    CaCla

    N a

    2

    S O

    4

    CaCla+NaCl

    0-2

    2-5

    5 0

    1 0 0

    20-0

    2-5

    5-0

    10-0

    20-0

    2- 5

    5- 0

    10-0

    20-0

    10-0

    20-0

    1-4

    22-0

    43-9

    87 8

    175-6

    14-6

    29 3

    58-0

    117-2

    16-5

    33-0

    66-0

    132-0

    73-2

    146-4

    100

    96

    66

    29

    17

    100

    41

    23

    12

    79

    89

    61

    23

    46

    2

    100

    100

    88

    49

    19

    100

    86

    54

    14

    94

    97

    85

    25

    64

    25

    4-6

    4-4

    6-9

    19-9

    38-0

    4-5

    7-1

    3 1

    8-2

    12-3

    14-1

    13-6

    16-7

    19-9

    30-1

    73-9

    67-5

    60-9

    57-0

    42-7

    64-5

    54-5

    52-4

    53-2

    64-7

    63-4

    65-2

    58-1

    49-9

    52-4

    60-9

    44-4

    51-0

    41-9

    38-7

    105-3

    116-0

    120-0

    100-3

    105-3

    83-9

    60-0

    53-5

    46-1

    69-9

    69-9

    87-3

    95-8

    103-8

    124-8

    87-3

    108-3

    112-3

    143-7

    05-9

    60-4

    91-3

    87-3

    128-7

    141-2

    4- 9

    18-2

    34-2

    106-6

    121-2

    1 9 0

    04-0

    94-0

    186-0

    7-5

    7-7

    9-5

    106-6

    107-2

    atUnive

    rsityofYorkonAugust19,2014

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/

    wnloadedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    6/9

    Ayoub Salt Tolerance

    in

    Senna 489

    There wasaprogressive reduc tioningrowth with increasing salinityofthesub-

    strate. This effect

    was

    more apparent

    in the

    plants exposed

    to

    chloride salinity.

    Fifty

    per

    cent reductions

    in

    growth were found

    at 4-0

    mmhos

    cm

    1

    CaCl2,

    at 7-0

    mmhos cm

    1

    NaCl,

    and at

    abou t 13-0 mm hos cm

    1

    Na2 SO4. Da ta

    on

    leaf shedding

    and plant survival confirmed

    the

    results reported

    for

    plant growth.

    Mineral

    compositionofshoots

    Mineral contentsof plant shootsas mEq per 100 g dry wt. are also shownin

    Table2. The control plants contained very littleNa andC l,but theirK contents

    were high. Increasing NaClin thesubs trate increasedCl and Na anddecreasedK

    con tents of shoots,

    Cl

    being accum ulatedatmuch higher rates. Sodium accum ulated

    in larger amountsin the shoots from NaCl treatments than from Na2S(>4,and Cl

    T A B L E 3. Effectof irrigation frequency with different NaCl levelsonsenna yield

    and yieldcomponents

    Irrigation interval NaCl levels (mmhos cm-

    1

    at 25

    C

    C) of saturated soil Watering

    extract effect

    0-9 7-5 10-1 16-1 27-8

    Pod yield (g/pot)

    7d 47-0 52-0 16-1

    14 d 18-2 24-3 11-6

    Salt effect 32-6 38-2 12-9

    S.e. means salt effect = 5-42, watering effect = 3-44.

    No. of pods/pot

    7 d 661-3 691-3 228-3

    14 d 254-7 330-0 176-7

    Salt effect 458-0 510-7 202-5

    S.e. means salt effect = 67-20, watering effect = 42-49.

    Final plant survival/pot

    7 d 8-0 8-0 4-7

    14 d 7-7 8-0 8-0

    Salt effect 7-9 8-0 6-4

    S.e. means salt effect = 0-86, watering effect = 0-54.

    Wt/dry pod (mg)

    7d 73-3 71-0 69-3

    14 d 68-0 72-7 68-3

    Salt effect 70-7 71-9 68-8

    S.e. means salt effect = 5-07, watering effect = 3-21.

    Dry wt. plant (g)

    7d 13-4 111 31

    14 d 11-4 7-5 3-5

    Salt effect 12-4 9-3 3-3

    S.e. means salt effect = 1-85, watering effect = 1-17.

    Plant height (cm)

    7 d 72-7 60-7 33-0

    14 d 59-7 52-7 40-7

    Salt effect 66-2 56-7 36-9

    S.e. means salt effect = 4-55, watering effect = 2-86.

    1-4

    5-3

    3-3

    25-3

    81-3

    53-3

    0-3

    2-7

    1-5

    6 9 0

    6 5 0

    67-0

    1 1

    1-7

    1-4

    25-0

    28-3

    26-7

    1-5

    5-6

    3-6

    32-0

    93-3

    62-7

    0-3

    0-7

    0-5

    47-0

    60-3

    53-7

    1-4

    1-8

    1-6

    2 5 0

    26-0

    25-5

    23-6

    1 3 0

    327-7

    187-2

    4-3

    5-4

    65-9

    66-ft

    6 0

    5-2

    43-3

    41-6

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,20

    14

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/

    Downloadedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    7/9

    490 Ayoub Salt Tolerance in Senna

    accum ulated in greater amo unts fromCaCl2treatm ents th an from NaCl. Increasing

    su bs tra te conten t of CaCl2 increased shoot Cl, Ca, and Mg contents w ith slight de-

    crease in K contents.

    Effect of frequency of irrigation ivith salt water on senna yield and yield componen ts

    Results of senna pod yield and yield components from different NaCl levels are

    shown in Table 3.

    ' P od yield was significantly affected b y sa lt levels, frequency of irriga tion, an d

    the ir interaction. W atering every7d with lower-salt wa ters resulted in apprec iably

    higher yields th an w atering every 14 d. Con trary to this, frequent irrigation w ith

    high-salt waters injured plants and resulted in lower pod yields than irrigation

    every 14 d with the same water.

    The number of pods per pot in the various treatments were comparable to pod

    yield while increasing salt level resulted in a small but significant P < 0-05)

    depression in pod weight.

    Plant survival was significantly reduced by salt levels higher than 10-0 mmhos

    cm

    1

    in the soil. This effect was more noticeable at the shorter watering interval

    than at the longer watering interval, indicating that the effect of NaCl salinity on

    sen na was not solely an osmotic phenom enon. Injure d p lants contained considerable

    am ounts of

    Cl

    which was closely related to the degree of visible injury.

    Po d yield was highly correlated w ith pod num ber (r = 0-9947), less with pla nt

    survival (r = 0-7221), and least with pod weight (r = 0-3818).

    Dry vxight per plant and plantTieight

    Significant reductions in dry matter yields and plant heights occurred at soil

    salinities of 10-0 mmhos cm

    1

    and above. W hen soil salinity was raised from 7-5

    6-0-

    5-0-

    v

    e

    p

    o

    y

    i

    e

    d

    3 3-0-

    2

    eo

    3 2-0-

    l-0

  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    8/9

    Ayoub

    Salt Tolerance in Senna

    491

    to 10-1 mm hos cm

    1

    reductions of65and 35 per cent were found in dry m atte r and

    pla nt height, respectively. Increasing th e watering interva l from 7 to 14 d reduced

    both parameters but not significantly.

    The relationship between pod yield and Cl contents of senna leaves is demon-

    strated in Fig. 3. Significant yield reduction occurred when the Cl content of the

    blade was above 28 m Eq per 100 g dry w t. Fifty per cent yield reduction occurred

    a tClcontent of about 62 m Eq , and at Cl content of greater th an 110 m E q pod yield

    was very low. The Na contents also varied with NaCl levels, but these variations

    seemed to be of minor magnitude.

    DISCUSSION

    Senna was shown to be fairly tolerant of salinity at the germination stage. A 50

    per cent reduction in germination was reached at salt levels between 20-0 and 24-0

    mmhos cm

    1

    . By way of contra st, a 50 per cent reduction in germ ination was found

    at 13-0 for groundnuts (Shalhevet, Reiniger, and Shimshi, 1969), 14-0 for tomatoes

    (van H oorn, 1970), and 21-0-30-5 mm hos cm

    1

    for rice (Pearson, Ayers, an d E ber-

    hard, 1966). The relatively higher tolerance of senna to salinity during germina-

    tion is not surprising since it is a crop originating from regions with a dry climate

    and where salinity problems usually exist . The optimum temperature at which

    senna could germ inate satisfactorily at high salinity levels was found to be between

    28 and 30 C. The significant interac tion of soil salinity an d air tem per atu re re-

    ported in this study might be imp ortan t in determining optimum sowing dates on

    saline soils. Senna seeds germinated in soils high in exchangeable sodium (ESP of

    35),

    bu t mo st of the seedlings died shortly after. T he chlorotic sym ptom s appearing

    in seedlings growing in high ES P levels couldbedue to the to xic effects of bica rbo na te

    ions resulting in high pH values.

    Salt type effects were considered important in senna since Na2SC>4 effects were

    generally less detrimental to the plant growth than were those of CaCl2 or NaCl

    of the same salinity. Plants treated with chloride salts were damaged to a greater

    extent indicating the more deleterious effects of chloride ion. With chloride salinity,

    CaCl2 was more toxic tha n N aCl. I t w ould appear t h at t he high chloride conc entra-

    tion in the plant tissue produces the dr astic decrease in plan t growth. I t is possible

    that the high sodium levels in plants found in some treatments could be due to

    chloride injury to mem branes giving rise to passive sodium u pta ke .

    Senna very rapidly absorbed chloride from the root media and accu m ulated toxic

    amounts of it in the leaves. Visible chloride injury symptoms occurred at foliar

    chloride concentration of abo ut 4270 m Eq per 100 g dry w t., pla nt g row th w as

    retarded at about85m Eq , and pla nt survival was highly imp aired at chloride levels

    of more tha n 140 m Eq . In its sensitivity to chloride injury, senna behaves in a like

    manner to avocado, citrus, and grapes but contrary to most plant species which are

    more sensitive to sulphate salts (Mengel, 1973).

    Fo r good pod yields of senna, NaCl salinity should not exceed ab out 8-0 m m hos

    cm

    1

    in the soil, but satisfactory yields may be obtained up to 15-0 mmhos cm

    1

    ,

    similar to safnower and wheat (Bernstein, 1970).

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,20

    14

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/

    Downloa

    dedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/
  • 8/10/2019 Senna Salt Stress

    9/9

    492 Ayoub Salt T olerance in Senna

    More frequent irriga tion w ith saline w ater induced, earlier and more severe inju ry

    than less frequent irrigation. Bernstein and Francois (1975) found that more fre-

    quent sprinkling with saline waters resulted in greater osmotic shock than less

    frequen t wa tering. Moreover, it was noted in this stud y th at w ater use by the crop

    was reduced greatly under high salinity. It is, therefore, inadvisable to give extra

    water to senna under saline conditions.

    In conclusion, the following points can be mentioned. Senna is moderately toler-

    ant to salinity. It seems to be more salt tolerant at germination and later growth

    stages , th e seedling stage being the most sensitive. Avoiding adverse environm ental

    conditions like high air temperature (Francois and Goodin, 1972), low relative

    humidity (O'Leary, 1975), and bad cultural practices (Sandoval and Benz, 1973)

    at that critical stage may improve the salinity tolerance by senna and its survival

    in the field.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The author is grateful to the Director General, A.R.C, Sudan for permission to

    publish this paper and to D r. R. H. Nieman ofU.S. Salinity Laboratory, Riverside,

    for his valuable comments and encouragement.

    L I T E R A T U R E C I T E D

    AYOTTB, ALI

    T., 1975. J. exp. Bot. 26 ,

    891-96.

    BE RN S T E I N , L., 1970.Agric. Inform. Bull.N o.283,U.S . Dept. Agrio.

    and FRANCOIS, L. E., 1975.

    Agron. J.

    67, 185-90.

    CHANG,C. E., and D BE G N E , H. E., 1955.Proc.SoilSet. Soc. A m. 19, 29-35.

    CHAPMAN, H. D., and PRATT, P. F . , 1961.I nMethods

    of ana lysis for soils, plants and waters.

    Univ.Calif.,R iverside, Div. Agrio. Sei.

    FBANCOIS ,

    L. E., and

    GOODIN,

    J. R., 1972.

    Agron. J.

    64, 272-73.

    GUPTA,R ., 1971.

    Indian Fmg.

    21, 29-32.

    M E N G E L , K., 1973. First FAO /SIDA Semina r for plant scientists from A frica and Near E ast,

    Cairo, Egypt, 1-20 September, 1973.

    O ' L E A R Y , J. W., 1975.

    PL

    Soil,42 ,717-21.

    PEARSON, J. A., AYERS,A. D., and EBEBHABD,D. L., 1966.Soil.

    Sri.

    38, 777-80.

    RI CH A RD S ,L. A. (Ed.), 1954.Diagnosis and improvement of saline

    and alkali soils.

    U.S. Dept.

    Agric. Handbook No. 60.

    SANDOVAL,F . M., and BE N Z ,L. C, 1973.

    Soil

    Sci.,166, 100-5.

    SHALHEVET,J ., RE I N I G E R, P., and SHXHSHI,D.1969.

    Agron, J.

    61 ,384-7.

    VAN HOOBN, J. W.,FAO/UNDP/TA seminaronmethodsofameliorationofsalineand

    water-

    logged

    soils,

    Beghdad, Iraq, 5-14 December 1970.

    atUniversityofYorkonAugust19,2014

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/

    Downlo

    adedfrom

    http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org/