Seminar 2.pptx

download Seminar 2.pptx

of 10

Transcript of Seminar 2.pptx

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    1/10

    Seminar 2: Article ReviewSocial and linguistic input in low-income African American mother-child dyads from 1 month through

    2 years: Relations to vocabulary developmentand

    hild-directed speech: relation to socioeconomic status! "nowledge of child developmental childvocabulary s"ill#

    Presented by,Bawani Sandrasegaran (TGB130011)

    Grace Saran Galawat (TGB130010)

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    2/10

    $ac"ground

    %ain focus: &ield of child linguistics speci'cally invocabulary development#

    Aim:i( to review the eloquent of linguistic and

    social inputin developing the childrensvocabulary#

    ii( to regulate the reason of dierentbackground of socioeconomic (SES) ofAmerican parents communicate dierentlywith their children#

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    3/10

    )roblem Statement

    *he frst journal statedthat the researchers hadfound out theinsuciency of study

    on the signicance oflinguistic and socialinput in child languagedevelopment amongethnic minority familiesandcommunities withdi+erent socioeconomiclevels#

    Second journal wasabout the crucial,uestion concern onthe reason of more wellliterate and"nowledgeable parentstal" moreand apply amore comple and

    assorted language withtheir children than lessliterate and"nowledgeable parents#

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    4/10

    *heoretical &ramewor"

    rticle !"

    .# %others who respond

    verbally to their infants/ Attentional

    0Shimpi unttenlocher! 2334( focusas

    well as their vocali5ations 0Rollins

    Snow! 1667( have infants who aremore

    productive with language#

    ii# %others who more often responded

    contingently to their infants/

    vocali5ations had children who were

    more developmentally advanced than

    infants whose mothers/ responseswere

    not contingent 0Rollins Snow! 1667(

    rticle #"

    .( igh 8 S9S mothers use longerutterances more di+erentwords when they tal" to theirchildren than low - S9S

    mothers and! in turn! theirchildren have largervocabularies# 0o+! 233(

    ..( ;ow-S9S mothers are found to

    tal" less use less variedvocabulary during interactionwith their children than high-S9S mothers# 0art Risley!166

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    5/10

    Research %ethodologyrticle !

    $articipants 3 mother-child dyads

    ;ow income parents

    =rug-free members> recruited viascreening interviews

    Average age 0time of giving birth(: 2< yrs6 months

    S9S : both the time when mother waspregnant the child was 13 yrs old 0 2&actor .nde of Social )osition>ollingshead Redlich! 16

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    6/10

    Research Euestions

    rticle !"%hreeresearch questions&

    !& %he stability ofmaternal social and

    linguistic input overtime is considered&

    #& %he signicance oflinguistic input onchild vocabularydevelopment isinvestigated&

    '& %he relations of socialinput ith childvocabulary use arelooked upon&

    rticle #"our research questions&

    !&%he measurement of variables inboth the quantity and quality of thechild*directed speech that parentsoer to the toddlers&

    #&%he measurement on child*directedspeech ith toddlers ere describeto childrens preschool vocabularyskill that refers to ability for thetoddler in controlling theirvocabulary skill&

    '&%he relationship beteen SES indisclose to child*directed speech

    and the researcher*directed speech&

    +&%he knoledge of the parenttoards child development andarbitrate of parental verbal facilityin relation beteen SES and child*directed speech&

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    7/10

    &indings

    rticle !"

    - *he diversity of themother/s

    vocabulary in earlydevelopment canlead to thediversity of the

    child/s vocabularyin toddlerhood#

    rticle #"

    - *he aBliation of child-directed speech andchild vocabulary s"illand again discussesconcerned on the mainfocused ,uestion of whyparents from di+erent

    S9S bac"groundscommunicatedi+erently with theirchildren#

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    8/10

    riti,ues

    Fea"nesses: both Gournals is the ambiguity ingiving information#

    rticle !"=iBculty in reading the numbers interms of age#

    =iBcult to understand the phrase)earson bivariate correlations whichwas said to be the data analysismethod of this study#Hne sentence which is I%any of thewomen in the sample group wereunmarried but most of the women

    were living with the infant/s father atthe time they gave birth isambiguous#.t is not very reader-friendly whenthe readers are directed to refer to$ernstein and ans 0166?( concerningthe recruitment of participants and the

    determination of social-environmentris" factors#

    rticle #"*he crucial part of its mainconcern has been repeated as it

    was well presented in its typicalacademic abstract#*he videotaped sessions weretruncated to the shortest taping#%ore on descriptive rather thaninformative analysis#

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    9/10

    ReJections

    Fe feel inspired by both study as ithas bro"en down the strong beliefthat child learning should beresponsive and child-led#

    ;earning the di+erences in S9S givesimpact to the developmental of achild-directed speech#

  • 8/9/2019 Seminar 2.pptx

    10/10

    References

    1# %9R9=.* ;# RHF9 02337(# Child-directed speech:relatin t sciecn!ic stat"s, #nwledge $ child

    de%elp!ent and child %cab"lary s#ill&Kournal of hild;anguage!

    Gournals#cambridge#orgLabstractMS33