Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

download Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

of 30

Transcript of Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    1/30

    NATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING

    BOARD

    SEMI-ANNUAL FAMILY PLANNING

    STATISTICAL REPORT

    JANUARY JUNE 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    2/30

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

    Page No.

    Acronyms

    Executive Summary 1

    Key Achievement and Observed Trends 2

    Family Planning Activities 3-16

    Next Steps 17-20

    List of Family Planning Tables

    A. Male Visits at Family Planning Centres by Region for the Periods 4January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    B. Female Adolescent Visits to Health Clinics for the 5Periods January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    C. Distribution of Commodities by Type to Regional Offices January 5- June 2011 & July - December 2010 (LMIS Data)

    D. Estimated Users of Family Planning Methods and Procedure for the 6Periods January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    E. Number of IUCD, Implant & ECP Units Distributed to Clients 7January - June 2011 & July - December 2010 (MCSR Data)

    F. Discontinuation Rates for Supply Methods at Regular 8Intervals, 2008 2011

    G. Number and Percentage of Mothers Receiving Postnatal Care and 9Accepting Family Planning (FP) at Postnatal Clinics, January - June2011 & July - December 2010

    H. Number & Percentage of Adolescent Mothers Receiving Postnatal 10

    Care & Accepting FP at PNCs, January - June 2011 & July December 2010

    I. Number of Dual Method Users by Region and Age Group for 12January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    3/30

    J. New Family Planning Acceptors by Method of Contraception 13at Regular Intervals July 2008 - June 2011

    K. New Acceptors of Contraceptive by Method by Parish, 14January - June 2011

    L. New Acceptors of Implant and IUCD by Age Group for 14January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    M. Sterilisation Procedures & Acceptors per Region for January 15- June 2011 & July - December 2010

    List of Family Planning Figures

    1. Total Visits at Family Planning Facilities 3

    2. Male Visits at Family Planning Facilities 3

    3. Discontinuation Rate of Supply Methods 2008 2011 8

    4. Percentage of Postnatal Clients not Accepting Family Planning by 11Health Regions for January June 2011 & July December 2010

    5. Percentage Distribution of Dual Method use by Region 12

    Appendices

    I. New Acceptors for January to June 2010 and July to December 2009 22

    II. Commodities Distributed to Clients of the Family Planning Programme 23for January to June 2010

    III. Attendance at Family Planning Clinics for January to June 2010 by Gender 24and Region Compared With July to December 2009

    IV. Male Visits by Parish and Region for January to June 2010 and July to 25December 2009

    V. Condom Distribution to STI Clients by Region and Parish 26for January to June 2010 and July to December 2009

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    4/30

    ACRONYMS

    AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

    CYP - Couple Year of Protection

    ECP - Emergency Contraceptive Protection

    DMU - Dual Method Use

    FP - Family Planning

    HIV - Human Immuno-deficiency Virus

    HMSR - Hospitals Monthly Summary Report

    IUCD - Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device

    KSA - Kingston & St. Andrew

    LMIS - Logistics Management Information System

    MCSR - Monthly Clinic Summary Report

    MOH - Ministry of Health

    NFPB - National Family Planning Board

    PNC - Postnatal Clinic

    RH - Reproductive Health

    STI - Sexually Transmitted Infection

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    5/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 1

    Executive Summary

    Examination of January to June 2011 and July to December 2010, Monthly Clinic

    Summary Report (MCSR), Hospital Monthly Summary Report (HMSR) and Logistics

    Management Information System (LMIS) data have contributed to the development ofthis report by the Department of Policy Formulation, Monitoring and Evaluation. This

    examination revealed some key findings which included a decline in the estimated

    number of Family Planning Acceptors by 6.8 percent, a decline in total visits to health

    centres by 5.8 percent and a significant increase in condom distribution, coupled with a

    decreased discontinuation rate of the condom (decrease of 25 percent).

    The report constitutes both negative and positive developments as it relates to the Family

    Planning Programme. In moving forward, however, the Board sees it as promising that

    condom use, and as a result, Dual Method Use, has increased as this will lead to a further

    decline in new cases of unplanned pregnancies and Sexually Transmitted Infections.

    Although on a whole, total visits to health centres declined, it is promising to note that

    male visits at Family Planning Clinics have increased. This may be attributed to the many

    activities of the Board which also encompass outreach activities which have promoted the

    importance of the male role in Family Planning.

    Through strengthening the promotion of age- appropriate family planning services and

    methods through the integration of Family Planning and HIV programme, it is envisioned

    that in the future, an increase in family planning acceptors will be seen island-wide for

    both genders.

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    6/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 2

    Key Achievement and Observed Trends

    1. There was an increase of 19.8 percent in the demand for Intra Uterine

    Contraceptive Device (IUCD). Also, Jadelle reported an increase in the demand

    by new acceptors.

    2. The estimated number of FP acceptors declined from 71,697 for July - December

    2010 to 66,807 for January - June 2011. This represented a decrease of 6.8percent.

    3. FP acceptors using Sterilisation1

    decreased from 4,120 (December 2010) to 3,550

    (June 2011). The health regions that contributed to the decline were South-East,North-East and Western. There were no reported Sterilisation operations in the

    parishes of Hanover and Westmoreland.

    4. The movement in the percentage of all mothers at Post Natal Clinics whoaccepted FP for the period January - June 2011 compared to July - December

    2010 was negligible. Seventy-eight percent of adolescent mothers accepted FP,which was three percentage points less than the previous six months.

    5. Total visits to health centres decreased by approximately 5.8 percent. Adolescent

    female visits to health clinics decreased from 15,285 t o 14,128.

    6. Condom distribution to FP clients increased by 85.7 percent. On the other hand,

    the distribution of the Pill declined by 25.7 percent.

    7. The Discontinuation Rate for Condom and Pill decreased to 25 percent and 42

    percent respectively, at the end of June 2011. Meanwhile, the DiscontinuationRate for Injection increased from 16 percent at the end of December 2010 to 26

    percent at the end of June 2011.

    8. A total of 31,434 persons were practising Dual Method Use during January toJune 2011 which represented a 26 percent increase compared to the 24,905

    persons practising Dual Method Use in the period July to December 2010.

    Adolescents practising Dual Method Use increased by approximately 21 percent.

    1 Estimated procedures are calculated using the CYP.

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    7/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 3

    Figure 1: Total Visits at Family Planning Facilities

    11,560

    132,921

    8,144

    145,242

    0

    20000

    40000

    60000

    80000

    100000

    120000

    140000

    160000

    Male Female

    #ofVisits

    Jan - Jun 2011 Jul - Dec 2010

    The total number of visits to family planning facilities decreased from 153,386 in the July

    - December 2010 period to 144,481 clients for the January - June 2011 period, which

    represents a 5.8 percent decline in total visits. Figure 1 above shows that females

    accounted for the majority of the visits at family planning facilities in both the June -

    December 2010 and January - June 2011 periods. Male visits to health clinics in the

    January - June 2011 period increased by 3,416 clients when compared to the previous six

    months. However, female visits decreased by 12,321 to 132,921 by the end of the January

    - June 2011 period. This represents an 8.5 percent decrease.

    Figure 2: Male Visits at Family Planning Facilities

    10041

    12185

    1367612652 12475

    8144

    11560

    0

    2000

    4000

    60008000

    10000

    12000

    14000

    16000

    Jan -Jun

    2008

    Jul - Dec

    2008

    Jan - Jun

    2009

    Jul - Dec

    2009

    Jan -Jun

    2010

    Jul - Dec

    2010

    Jan - Jun

    2011

    #ofV

    isits

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    8/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 4

    Figure 2 shows that male visits at Family Planning facilities have fluctuated between

    January - June 2008 and January - June 2011. The total male visits to health facilities

    increased from 8,144 in the July - December 2010 period to 11,560 in the January - June

    2011 period which represents an increase of 41.9 percent. All the regions reported

    increases in male visits at Family Planning Clinics. The largest increase was seen in the

    South-East region (99.6 percent) while the smallest increase was seen in the North-East(7.7 percent) (Table A).

    Table A: Male Visits at Family Planning Centres by Regionfor the Period

    January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    RegionMale

    January - June2011

    July - December2010 Change (%)

    South-East 2,676 1,341 99.6

    North-East 1,241 1,152 7.7

    Western 4,253 2,902 46.6

    Southern 3,390 2,749 23.3

    Jamaica 11,560 8,144 41.9Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    9/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 5

    Total female adolescent visits to health facilities during the period January - June 2011

    decreased by 7.6 percent to 14,128 when compared to the 15,285 that visited in the

    previous six months. The largest percentage decreases were observed in the parishes of

    Clarendon, Westmoreland and Portland which declined by 30.7 percent, 21.6 percent and

    18.2 percent respectively. On the other hand, there were increases in St Thomas of 23.5

    percent and in St James of 14.0 percent (Table B).

    Table C: Distribution of Commodities by Type to Regional OfficesJanuary to June 2011 & July December 2011 (LMIS data)

    Commodity

    Number Distributed

    January - June2011 July - December2010 % Change

    Pill 69,978 94,160 -25.7

    Condom 2,232,450 1,201,876 85.7

    IUCD 360 2,037 -82.3

    Injectables 96,732 113,343 -14.7

    Total 2,399,520 1,411,507 70.0

    Source: NFPB LMIS Data, 2010 & 2011

    Table B: Female Adolescent Visits to Health Clinics for the PeriodsJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    January - June2011

    July - December2010

    Change(%)

    KSA 3,279 3,729 -12.1

    St. Thomas 558 452 23.5St. Catherine 2,611 2,581 1.2

    Portland 365 446 -18.2

    St. Mary 815 839 -2.9

    St. Ann 918 1,003 -8.5

    Trelawny 567 563 0.7

    St. James 1,234 1,082 14.0

    Hanover 469 488 -3.9

    Westmoreland 936 1,194 -21.6

    St. Elizabeth 711 821 -13.4

    Manchester 702 697 0.7

    Clarendon 963 1,390 -30.7

    Total 14,128 15,285 -7.6

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    10/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 6

    NFPB LMIS data shows that there was an increase in the distribution of overall

    contraceptives from 1,411,507 in the July - December 2010 period to 2,399,520 in the

    January June 2011 period, which represents an 70.0 percent increase. Condoms

    increased by 1,030,574 (85.7 percent), while the distribution of IUCD, Pill and

    Injectables declined by 1,677 (82.3 percent), 24,182 (25.7 percent) and 16,611 (14.7

    percent) respectively. Condoms were the most distributed commodity in both periods,

    while IUCD was the least (Table C).

    An examination of Table D reveals that the estimated users of Family Planning services

    for the period January - June 2011 declined by 4.1 percent from 71,697 in July -

    December 2010 to 68,780 in the January - June 2011 period. Three methods (Condom,

    IUCD and Implant) saw increases in their estimated users in the January - June 2011

    period when compared to the July - December 2010 period. Condom saw the largest

    2Estimated users are calculated using the CYP.The CYP is calculated by multiplying or dividing the quantity of each method distributed to clients by a conversion factor, to yield an

    estimate of the duration of contraceptive protection provided per unit of that method. The calculation takes into account that somemethods, like condoms and oral contraceptives, for example, may be used incorrectly and then discarded, or that IUDs and implants

    may be removed before their life span is realised.

    Conversion Factor:IUD x 2.3

    Pill 7.5

    Condom - 60Injection - 2

    Implant x 1.9

    Sterilisation x5

    Table D: Estimated Users2 of Family Planning Methods and Procedure for the PeriodsJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Method January - June 2011 July - December 2010 Change (%)

    Pill 6,427 7,468 -13.9Injection 44,905 51,540 -12.9

    Condom 9,867 5,190 90.1

    IUD 3,820 3,262 17.1

    Implant 211 117 80.3

    Sterilisation 3,550 4,120 -13.8

    Total 68,780 71,697 -4.1

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    11/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 7

    percent increase of 90.1 percent, while Implant saw an 80.3 percent increase followed by

    IUCD which saw a 17.1 percent increase. Pill, Injection and Sterilisation use decreased

    by 13.9 percent, 12.9 percent and 13.8 percent respectively. Injection was the most used

    Family Planning method while Implant was the least used.

    Table E shows the total distribution of IUCD, Implant and ECP to clients combined

    decreased from 1,996 in the July to December 2010 period to 1,831 for the January to

    June 2011 period. This reduction was mainly due to a 10.9 percent decline in IUCD

    distribution for the period. Only Implant registered an increase between the two periods

    (65.7 percent) while IUCD and ECP both decreased by 10.9 percent and 9.2 percent

    respectively.

    Table E: Number of IUCD, Implant & ECP Units Distributed to ClientsJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010 (MCSR data)

    MethodJanuary - June

    2011July - December

    2010 Change (%)

    IUCD 1,661 1,864 -10.9

    Implant 111 67 65.7

    ECP 59 65 -9.2

    Total 1,831 1,996 -8.3

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2008 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    12/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 8

    Figure 3: Discontinuation RateOf Supply Methods

    2008 - 2011

    13

    46

    33

    62

    7

    28 30

    40

    24

    4742

    19

    111613

    26

    11

    16

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    5060

    70

    Jul - Dec 2008 Jan - Jun 2009 Jul - Dec 2009 Jan - Jun 2010 Jul - Dec 2010 Jan - Jun 2011

    Period

    Percent

    Condom Pill Injection

    The Discontinuation Rate for all three methods of contraceptive fluctuated between the

    July - December 2008 and January - June 2011 periods. Both Condom and Pill

    Discontinuation Rates3

    decreased between the July - December and January - June 2011

    periods, while the contraceptive Injections Discontinuation Rate increased when the two

    periods are compared. The Discontinuation Rate for Condom saw the highest change

    when compared to the other two contraceptives declining considerably by 55 per cent

    from 62 per cent in July - December 2010 to 7 percent in the January - June 2011 period.

    This shows that fewer FP clients have discontinued use of this method. The rate for the

    Pill decreased marginally from 47 percent to 42 percent for the period under review

    (Figure 3). However, more clients have discontinued use of the Injection since the Rate

    has increased from 16 percent to 26 percent (Table F).

    3Calculation for Discontinuation Rate = Step 1: Estimated Users (Jan to June 2011) [Estimated Users (July to Dec 2010) + New

    Acceptors (Jan to June 2011)] x 100. Step 2: Subtract total from 100.

    Table F: Discontinuation Rates for Supply Methods at Regular Intervals, 2008 - 2011

    January - June2011

    July - December2010

    January - June2010

    July - December2009

    January - June2009

    July - December2008

    Condom 7 62 33 46 13 13

    Pill 42 47 24 40 30 28

    Injection 26 16 11 19 16 11

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    13/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 9

    There was a slight increase in the proportion of mothers at PNCs who accepted Family

    Planning services. Of the 15,310 mothers receiving Postnatal Services in the January -

    June 2011, 11,228 accepted Family Planning services. In the July - December period

    12,038 accepted Family Planning of the 16,457 that received Postnatal Services. Thus the

    totals moved from 73.1 percent to 73.3 percent for the January - June 2011 period when

    compared to the previous six months. On a regional level, the South-East and Western

    regions reported increases of 4.2 percent and 3 percent respectively for the proportion of

    mothers who accepted FP services at Postnatal Clinics. Conversely the other two regions

    namely Southern and North-East, declined by 7.7 percent and 2 percent respectively

    (Table G).

    Table G: Number & Percentage of Mothers Receiving Postnatal Care and Accepting Family Planning (FP) at Postnatal Clinics,January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Number Receiving PostnatalServices

    Number Accepting Family PlanningMethods Percentage Accepting

    January - June

    2011

    July - December

    2010

    January - June

    2011

    July - December

    2010

    January - June

    2011

    July - December

    2010South-East 5,752 6,338 4,364 4,547 75.9 71.7

    KSA 2,633 3,119 2,042 2,336 77.6 74.9

    St. Thomas 517 495 375 367 72.5 74.1

    St. Catherine 2,602 2,724 1,947 1,844 74.8 67.7

    North-East 2,267 2,518 1,671 1,906 73.7 75.7

    Portland 452 482 294 367 65.0 76.1

    St. Mary 729 804 546 614 74.9 76.4

    St. Ann 1,086 1,232 831 925 76.5 75.1

    Western 3,686 3,808 3,052 3,040 82.8 79.8

    Trelawny 539 609 461 506 85.5 83.1

    St. James 1,503 1,500 1,261 1,192 83.9 79.5

    Hanover 552 533 465 462 84.2 86.7

    Westmoreland 1,092 1,166 865 880 79.2 75.5

    Southern 3,605 3,793 2,141 2,545 59.4 67.1

    St. Elizabeth 1,030 977 711 705 69.0 72.2

    Manchester 1,074 1,108 634 705 59.0 63.6

    Clarendon 1,501 1,708 796 1,135 53.0 66.5

    Total 15,310 16,457 11,228 12,038 73.3 73.1

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    14/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 10

    Table H reveals that the number of adolescent mothers receiving Postnatal services

    decreased by 137 from 3,259 in July - December 2010 to 3,122 in January - June 2011.

    Meanwhile, during the January - June 2011 period 2,433 adolescent mothers accepted a

    FP method at Postnatal Clinic (PNC), a decrease of 207 when compared to the 2,640 in

    the July - December 2010 period. For the January - June 2011 period, the most adolescent

    mothers receiving Postnatal Care at PNC was observed in the South-East region at 1,151

    while the least was 450 in the North-East. The South-East and North-East regions saw the

    most and least adolescent mothers accepting FP at PNC respectively (Table H).

    Table H: Number & Percentage of Adolescent Mothers Receiving Postnatal Care & Accepting FP atPNCs January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Number ReceivingPostnatal Services

    Number Accepting FamilyPlanning Methods % Accepting

    LocationJan - Jun

    2011Jul - Dec

    2010Jan - Jun

    2011Jul - Dec

    2010Jan - Jun

    2011Jul - Dec

    2010

    Jamaica 3,122 3,259 2,433 2,640 78 81

    South-East 1,151 1,272 946 1,022 82 80

    KSA 570 667 453 534 79 80

    St. Thomas 110 104 89 85 81 82

    St. Catherine 471 501 404 403 86 80

    North-East 450 472 367 394 82 83

    Portland 83 104 66 92 80 88

    St. Mary 157 161 131 132 83 82

    St. Ann 210 207 170 170 81 82

    Western 774 807 668 702 86 87

    Trelawny 114 130 102 111 89 85

    St. James 312 293 277 255 89 87

    Hanover 117 101 102 93 87 92

    Westmoreland 231 283 187 243 81 86

    Southern 747 708 452 522 61 74

    St. Elizabeth 198 173 138 134 70 77

    Manchester 208 192 141 141 68 73

    Clarendon 341 343 173 247 51 72

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    15/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 11

    2428 26

    24

    1720

    41

    33

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    Percent

    South-East North-East Western Southern

    Regions

    Figure 4: Percentage of Postnatal Clients not Accepting Family Planning by

    Health Regions for January - June 2011 & July -December 2010

    Jan - Jun 2011 Jul - Dec 2010

    As seen in Figure 4, two regions saw an increase in the percentage of mothers not

    accepting family planning. For the January - June 2011 period, there was a marked

    increase of 8 percent of the total number of Postnatal clients not accepting Family

    Planning in the Southern region when compared to the July - December 2010 period. The

    Postnatal clients not accepting FP in the North-East region increased by 2 percent at the

    end of January - June 2011 period. However, both the South-East and Western regions

    reported declines moving from 28 percent to 24 percent and from 20 percent to 17

    percent respectively.

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    16/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 12

    Table I: Number of Dual Method Users by Region and Age Group forJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Region

    TotalAge Groups

    10 - 19 20 - 29 30+

    Jan - Jun

    2011

    Jul - Dec

    2010

    %

    Change

    Jan - Jun

    2011

    Jul - Dec

    2010

    Jan - Jun

    2011

    Jul - Dec

    2010

    Jan - Jun

    2011

    Jul - Dec

    2010South-East 19,001 12,588 51 2,560 1,735 8,836 5,886 7,605 4,96North-East 4,361 4,460 -2 614 669 2,229 2,192 1,518 1,59

    Western 4,228 3,091 37 747 642 2,146 1,575 1,335 87

    Southern 3,844 4,767 -19 466 596 1,682 2,127 1,696 2,04

    Total 31,434 24,906 26 4,387 3,642 14,893 11,780 12,154 9,48

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

    Table I shows that the total number of persons practising Dual Method Use increased

    from 24,906 in the July - December 2010 period to 31,434 in January - June 2011 period.

    This represents an increase of 26.2 percent. All age groups saw an increase in Dual

    Method Use in the January - June 2011 period when compared to the July December

    2010 period. The least number of persons practising Dual Method Use were in the

    adolescent age group, while the 20 - 29 age group had the highest number of persons

    practising Dual Method Use.

    60

    51

    14 18

    13 12 1219

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    Percent

    South-East North-East Western Southern

    Regions

    Figure 5: Percentage Distribution of Dual Method Use by Region

    Jan - Jun 2011 Jul - Dec 2010

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    17/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 13

    The percentage distribution of the Dual Method Use is outlined in Figure 5. As seen in

    Figure 5, two regions saw an increase in the percentage of persons practising Dual

    Method Use. For the January - June 2011 period, there was an increase of 9 percent when

    compared to the previous six months in the South-East region followed by an increase of

    1 percent in the Western region. However, both the North-East and South regions

    reported declines by 4 percent and 7 percent respectively.

    Table J shows a declining trend for most methods of contraception in the January - June

    2011 period when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010 and 2009. A total of

    18,966 New Family Planning Acceptors used all Methods of Contraception in the

    January - June 2011 period which represented a 0.3 percent decrease when compared to

    the 19,027 used in the July - December 2010 period. All contraceptive methods recorded

    a decline in new acceptors excluding the Condom, IUCD and Jadelle methods of

    contraception. For the January - June 2011 period, the number of new acceptors using

    Condom increased by 45.1 percent to 5,375 when compared to the period July -

    December 2010. Both the Pill and Injection declined by 12.4 percent and 12.5 percent

    respectively for the review period (Table J).

    Table J: New Family Planning Acceptors by Method of Contraception at Regular Intervals - July 2008 to June 2011

    Methods January - June

    2011

    July - December

    2010

    January - June

    2010

    July - December

    2009

    January - June

    2009

    July - December

    2008All Methods 18,966 19,027 20,166 18,581 21,614 19,985

    Pill 3,531 4,032 4,511 4,198 5,546 4,572

    Injection 9,406 10,755 10,874 10,098 10,469 10,457

    IUCD 551 460 570 344 518 372

    Norplant/Jadelle 95 59 5 2 10 81

    ECP 8 16 6 146 390 290

    Condom 5,375 3,705 4,200 3,793 4,681 4,258

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2008 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    18/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 14

    From Table K, the total number of new acceptors of contraceptive by method was

    18,966. The largest numbers of new acceptors for all contraceptives were in the parishes

    of Kingston and St Andrew (4,083) followed by St Catherine (3,090) and Clarendon

    (1,678). The smallest numbers of new acceptors were observed in the parishes of

    Portland (401), St Thomas (585) and Trelawny (659). The injection was the most used

    method of contraception in KSA and for all parishes except St James and St Elizabeth,

    while the least used method of contraception was the ECP.

    Overall the number of Jadelle users has steadily increased since it was introduced in2010. For the period January - June 2011, a total of 551 new acceptors used IUCD. This

    represents an increase of 19.8 percent when compared with the 460 which used IUCD in

    the July - December period. Most acceptors of IUCD (287) for the January - June 2011

    period were within the 20 - 29 age group followed by the 30 and over age group which

    saw 205 users, while only 59 users were from the 10 - 19 age group (Table L).

    Table K: New Acceptors of Contraceptive by Method by Parish, January - June 2011

    Parish Pill Injection IUCD Norplant ECP Condom Total

    KSA 425 2,484 145 65 0 964 4,083

    St Thomas 149 290 30 0 0 116 585

    St Catherine 681 1,823 71 0 0 515 3,090

    Portland 69 206 7 0 0 119 401

    St Mary 197 457 18 0 3 315 990

    St Ann 198 644 9 30 1 436 1,318

    Trelawny 157 334 63 0 4 101 659

    St James 490 467 85 0 0 620 1,662

    Hanover 210 275 25 0 0 176 686

    Westmoreland 250 709 61 0 0 381 1,401

    St Elizabeth 337 393 0 0 0 490 1,220

    Manchester 230 551 20 0 0 392 1,193

    Clarendon 138 773 17 0 0 750 1,678

    Total 3,531 9,406 551 95 8 5,375 18,966

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2011

    Table L: New Acceptors of Implant & IUCD by Age Group for January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    January - June 2011 July - December 2010

    10 - 19 20 - 29 30+ Total 10 - 19 20 - 29 30+ Total

    Implant (Jadelle) 9 46 40 95 5 37 17 59

    IUCD 59 287 205 551 47 249 164 460

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    19/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 15

    A total of 95 new acceptors utilised the contraceptive Jadelle which represents a 61.0

    percent increase in the January - June 2011 period when compared to July - December

    2010. For the January - June 2011 period, the 20 - 29 age cohort increased from 37 to 46

    Jadelle users when compared to July - December 2010, meanwhile for the 30 and over

    age cohort the increase in Jadelle users was from 17 to 40. Nine individuals in the 10-19

    age group were new acceptors of the Implant in the period January - June 2011 when

    compared to 5 new acceptors in the July - December 2010 period. (Table L).

    A total of 3,550 sterilisation acceptors4

    were recorded for January - June 2011

    representing a decline of 13.8 percent when compared to the observed 4,120 in July -

    December 2010. This is due to declines in all regions except the Southern region, which

    4 The number of Sterilisation Acceptors was calculated by multiplying the number of Sterilisation Procedures by 5.

    Table M: Sterilisation Procedures & Acceptors per Region forJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Procedures Acceptors

    January - June2011

    July - December2010

    January - June2011

    July - December2010

    South-East 346 420 1,730 2,100

    KSA 162 170 810 850

    St. Thomas 19 52 95 260

    St. Catherine 165 198 825 990

    North-East 114 145 570 725

    Portland 13 23 65 115

    St. Mary 47 58 235 290

    St. Ann 54 64 270 320

    Western 86 124 430 620Trelawny 15 0 75 0

    St. James 71 124 355 620

    Hanover 0 0 0 0

    Westmoreland 0 0 0 0

    Southern 164 135 820 675

    St. Elizabeth 11 20 55 100

    Manchester 102 87 510 435

    Clarendon 51 28 255 140

    Total 710 824 3,550 4,120

    Source: MoH HMSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    20/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 16

    reported an increase in acceptors from 675 to 820 for the period under review. The

    parishes which contributed to the increase in the Southern region were Manchester and

    Clarendon. On the other hand, the parishes that reported the largest decreases in acceptors

    were St Elizabeth, Portland and St Thomas. Of note, Trelawny recorded 75 acceptors,

    after none was reported in the previous six months (Table M).

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    21/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 17

    Next Steps

    Total Number of Mothers Including Adolescent Mothers Accepting Family

    Planning

    Three quarters (73.3%) of mothers receiving postnatal services in Postnatal Clinics also

    accepted Family Planning methods in the January June 2011 period; while 26.7 percent

    did not accept. Of the total accepting mothers, 20.4 percent were adolescent mothers, and

    77.9 percent accepted FP as well which is less than the 81 percent that accepted in the

    July- December period. Every effort should be made to encourage all mothers, especially

    adolescent mothers receiving postnatal services to accept FP as well, so as to achieve the

    national objective of maintaining a stable and healthy population. It would have beenfavourable to have a higher percentage of adolescent mothers accepting FP methods at

    PNCs. Measures need to be put in place to ensure higher acceptance of Family Planning

    methods by adolescent mothers.

    One possible measure is to offer FP methods to adolescent mothers when they attend

    clinics to immunise their child/ children. Likewise, since many adolescents source

    contraceptives in the private sector such as pharmacies, an adolescent friendly

    environment needs to be provided to encourage adolescents, especially adolescent

    mothers to request contraceptive without fear of being ridiculed. Ensuring that

    information on Reproductive Health is made available to adolescents in the most basic

    form in schools, churches, the media and health centres, among others, can assist in

    increasing contraceptive use among adolescents as well.

    Another issue that requires urgent attention is the abstinence alone message. The

    Ministry of Healths and the Ministry of Educations policies focus on a promotion of

    abstinence among adolescents. However, the promotion of abstinence alone will not

    reap the desired results. The promotion of contraceptive use among adolescents continues

    to be indispensable. A decision needs to be made as to whether the abstinence alone

    message will be re-examined so as to take into consideration the fact that a large number

    of adolescents in the school system are sexually active and are having unprotected sex.

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    22/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 18

    Estimated Users of Family Planning Methods and Procedures

    It was observed that the estimated users of Family Planning methods and proceduresdeclined by 4.1 percent. The pill, injection, and sterilisation contributed to the overall

    decline in estimated users of FP in the period under review. Interest in sterilisation among

    women has been declining since the 1997 RHS. The 2008 RHS found that even among

    women aged 15- 49 who wanted no more children, interest in sterilisation was low. Main

    reasons given for not wanting to use sterilisation were because of their age, preference to

    use other method of contraception, fear of the surgery, fear of side effects after surgery,

    and because of uncertainty about future fertility preferences. As it relates to the pill,

    because most users source this method in the private sector, it would be helpful to

    understand whether there was a decline at the private sector level as well. Data from the

    2008 RHS shows that at the national level pill use has been declining steadily since the

    1997 RHS.

    The injection and the condom remained the preferred methods of contraceptive since both

    have been the most well-known of all methods since 1989. It is likewise not surprising

    that implants were the least used method in both periods especially because implants are

    costly and are only offered at a few selected Family Planning sites in Jamaica. However,

    the National Family Planning Board could consider increasing the promotion of implants

    by providing more information to women in the areas that the services are available.

    Unlike other methods that require daily use and are more short-term, implants are

    effective up to five years and could satisfy the long-term Family Planning needs of

    reproductive age women especially for those in the medical eligibility criteria that

    restricts the use of a product with oestrogen.

    Dual Method Use

    Twenty-six point two (26.2) percent more clients were using more than one method of

    contraceptive (dual method users) at a time. Dual method use increased in all age cohorts

    with the majority of users being in the 20-29 age cohorts, while the 10-19 age cohorts had

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    23/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 19

    the least amount of dual method users. The fact that dual method use increased by 20.5

    percent in the 10-19 age cohort is encouraging given the fact that risky behaviour in this

    age cohort has always been a major health problem for health providers and policy

    makers alike. Every effort should be made to encourage the 10-19 age cohorts to continue

    practicing dual method use.

    Even though many persons might view it as expensive and inconvenient to add condoms

    to a method of contraception that is highly effective in preventing pregnancies, the fact is

    these methods provide no protection against the spread of Sexually Transmitted

    Infections. Dual method use remains the only approach to contraceptive use that is

    effective in preventing the spread of STIs, preventing unplanned pregnancies, as well as

    in providing a defence against the threat of infertility. The NFPB and its functionariesshould continue to emphasise to the sexually active population the importance of dual

    method use for dual protection against STIs and unplanned pregnancies.

    Male Visits at Family Planning Clinics

    Females, as is expected accounted for the majority of the visits to Family Planning

    Clinics in both periods. However, whereas the total number of females visiting Family

    Planning Clinics decreased by 8.5 percent, visits by males to FPCs increased by 42

    percent when the two periods are compared. The statistics are encouraging given the fact

    that traditionally, Reproductive Health has always been deemed to be a womans

    responsibility. Because sexually active men and women have to contend with more than

    just unplanned pregnancies, but now have to contend with STIs including the deadly

    HIV/AIDS disease, it is imperative that both women and men alike be just as involved in

    Family Planning decision making, and that men continue to see the importance of their

    involvement in the process as well.

    The health providers at clinics will need to focus their attention on providing an

    environment that is conducive to mens participation (male friendly) in the process. Plans

    need to be put in place that will provide men with more information on the variety of

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    24/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 20

    contraceptive choices available for both they and women, the negative consequences of

    failure to use contraceptive, among others. It is germane that Reproductive Health

    programmes be developed and implemented in an unbiased way so that men can be

    incorporated in the Family Planning decision making process. These actions will allow

    men to understand their importance in the Family Planning process; could help reduce the

    number of unplanned pregnancies, and the spread of STIs; as well as allow men to realise

    that they are just as entitled to Reproductive Health services as their female counterparts.

    Condom Distribution

    A number of positive indicators were seen from the data gathered: condom distribution

    by the NFPB to FPCs increased by 92 percent, and the number of estimated users ofcondoms almost doubled when the two periods are compared. Of the three most used

    methods of contraceptives (injection, condom, and pill), the Discontinuation Rate for

    Condom saw the most change when compared to other methods, which is evidence that

    more users are continuing to use condoms consistently. Likewise, the total number of

    condoms distributed to STI clients has increased by 17.1 percent in the latter six months

    when compared to the former six months.

    The fact that every STI clients are issued condoms when they visit public sector clinics is

    a practice that should continue so as to prevent the spread of STIs to other uninfected

    clients, while meeting the FP needs of this group. Three regions observed increase in

    condom distribution to STI clients except for the Southern region. Steps have to be taken

    to ensure a consistent and adequate distribution of condoms in all regions in an effort to

    reduce the spread of STIs.

    Overall though, the fact that sexually active persons are continuing to use condom, and

    more condoms are being made available to STI clients is welcoming news given the fact

    that the condom remains the only method of contraception that is effective in preventing

    pregnancies as well as the spread of STIs. The NFPB therefore needs to continue to

    endorse programmes that focus on the promotion of condom use among the reproductive

    age group in all regions.

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    25/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 21

    APPENDICES

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    26/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 22

    Appendix I: New Acceptors for January - June 2011 &July - December 2010

    ParishJanuary - June

    2011July - December

    2010

    KSA 4,083 4,037

    St. Thomas 585 535

    St. Catherine 3,090 2,929

    Portland 401 528

    St. Mary 990 1,066

    St. Ann 1,318 1,394

    Trelawny 659 725

    St. James 1,662 1,638

    Hanover 686 588

    Westmoreland 1,401 1,396

    St. Elizabeth 1,220 1,110

    Manchester 1,193 1,181

    Clarendon 1,678 1,900

    Total 18,966 19,027

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    27/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 23

    Appendix II: Commodities Distributed to Clients of the Family Planning Programme for January - June 2011

    Parish/Region Pill Injection Condom IUD Implant ECP

    South-East 18,820 45,848 227,546 543 71 0

    KSA 6,446 24,630 128,073 433 71 0

    St. Thomas 2,579 3,363 35,324 36 0 0

    St. Catherine 9,795 17,855 64,149 74 0 0

    North-East 6,563 14,635 88,073 138 39 54

    Portland 809 2,986 11,302 27 0 0

    St. Mary 1,819 5,097 33,476 24 0 4

    St. Ann 3,935 6,552 43,295 87 39 54

    Western 11,952 15,707 147,704 795 1 5

    Trelawny 2,402 3,978 32,211 556 0 5

    St. James 4,037 3,930 47,550 92 0 0

    Hanover 3,187 2,711 38,514 31 1 0Westmoreland 2,326 5,088 29,429 116 0 0

    Southern 10,869 13,619 128,700 185 0 0

    St. Elizabeth 6,865 4,409 43,252 74 0 0

    Manchester 2,482 4,245 38,690 92 0 0

    Clarendon 1,522 4,965 46,758 19 0 0

    Jamaica 48,204 89,809 592,023 1,661 111 59

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    28/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 24

    Appendix III: Attendance at Family Planning Clinics for January - June 2011 by Gender and RegionCompared with July - December 2010

    Region

    Total Male Female

    Jan - Jun2011

    Jul - Dec2010

    Jan - Jun2011

    Jul - Dec2010

    Jan - Jun2011

    Jul - Dec2010

    South-East 63,010 63,912 2,676 1,341 60,334 62,571

    North-East 21,712 22,721 1,241 1,152 20,471 21,569

    Western 30,822 30,501 4,253 2902 26,569 27,599

    Southern 28,937 36,252 3,390 2,749 25,547 33,503

    Total 144,481 153,386 11,560 8,144 132,921 145,242

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    29/30

    NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 25

    Appendix IV: Male Visits by Parish and Region forJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Parish/RegionJanuary - June

    2011July - December

    2010

    South-East 2,676 1,341

    KSA 1,440 761St. Thomas 213 101

    St. Catherine 1,023 479

    North-East 1,241 1,152

    Portland 100 185

    St. Mary 825 700

    St. Ann 316 267

    Western 4,253 2,902

    Trelawny 1,170 832

    St. James 1,480 923

    Hanover 816 867

    Westmoreland 787 280

    Southern 3,390 2,749

    St. Elizabeth 1,256 1,114

    Manchester 596 436

    Clarendon 1,538 1,199

    Jamaica 11,560 8,144

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011

  • 8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)

    30/30

    Appendix V: Condom Distribution to STI Clients by Region andParish for

    January - June 2011 & July - December 2010

    Parish/RegionJanuary - June

    2011July - December

    2010

    South-East 56,933 25,791

    KSA 36,935 18,402St. Thomas 1,190 296

    St. Catherine 18,808 7,093

    North-East 39,728 31,546

    Portland 4,993 6,178

    St. Mary 3,883 3,565

    St. Ann 30,852 21,803

    Western 41,909 39,774

    Trelawny 9,961 11,095

    St. James 19,192 12,368

    Hanover 10,166 13,989

    Westmoreland 2,590 2,322

    Southern 25,608 43,145

    St. Elizabeth 7,422 29,391

    Manchester 3,927 8,655

    Clarendon 14,259 5,099

    Jamaica 164,178 140,256

    Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011