Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
-
Upload
titania-mcdonald -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
1/30
NATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING
BOARD
SEMI-ANNUAL FAMILY PLANNING
STATISTICAL REPORT
JANUARY JUNE 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
2/30
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
Acronyms
Executive Summary 1
Key Achievement and Observed Trends 2
Family Planning Activities 3-16
Next Steps 17-20
List of Family Planning Tables
A. Male Visits at Family Planning Centres by Region for the Periods 4January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
B. Female Adolescent Visits to Health Clinics for the 5Periods January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
C. Distribution of Commodities by Type to Regional Offices January 5- June 2011 & July - December 2010 (LMIS Data)
D. Estimated Users of Family Planning Methods and Procedure for the 6Periods January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
E. Number of IUCD, Implant & ECP Units Distributed to Clients 7January - June 2011 & July - December 2010 (MCSR Data)
F. Discontinuation Rates for Supply Methods at Regular 8Intervals, 2008 2011
G. Number and Percentage of Mothers Receiving Postnatal Care and 9Accepting Family Planning (FP) at Postnatal Clinics, January - June2011 & July - December 2010
H. Number & Percentage of Adolescent Mothers Receiving Postnatal 10
Care & Accepting FP at PNCs, January - June 2011 & July December 2010
I. Number of Dual Method Users by Region and Age Group for 12January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
3/30
J. New Family Planning Acceptors by Method of Contraception 13at Regular Intervals July 2008 - June 2011
K. New Acceptors of Contraceptive by Method by Parish, 14January - June 2011
L. New Acceptors of Implant and IUCD by Age Group for 14January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
M. Sterilisation Procedures & Acceptors per Region for January 15- June 2011 & July - December 2010
List of Family Planning Figures
1. Total Visits at Family Planning Facilities 3
2. Male Visits at Family Planning Facilities 3
3. Discontinuation Rate of Supply Methods 2008 2011 8
4. Percentage of Postnatal Clients not Accepting Family Planning by 11Health Regions for January June 2011 & July December 2010
5. Percentage Distribution of Dual Method use by Region 12
Appendices
I. New Acceptors for January to June 2010 and July to December 2009 22
II. Commodities Distributed to Clients of the Family Planning Programme 23for January to June 2010
III. Attendance at Family Planning Clinics for January to June 2010 by Gender 24and Region Compared With July to December 2009
IV. Male Visits by Parish and Region for January to June 2010 and July to 25December 2009
V. Condom Distribution to STI Clients by Region and Parish 26for January to June 2010 and July to December 2009
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
4/30
ACRONYMS
AIDS - Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
CYP - Couple Year of Protection
ECP - Emergency Contraceptive Protection
DMU - Dual Method Use
FP - Family Planning
HIV - Human Immuno-deficiency Virus
HMSR - Hospitals Monthly Summary Report
IUCD - Intra Uterine Contraceptive Device
KSA - Kingston & St. Andrew
LMIS - Logistics Management Information System
MCSR - Monthly Clinic Summary Report
MOH - Ministry of Health
NFPB - National Family Planning Board
PNC - Postnatal Clinic
RH - Reproductive Health
STI - Sexually Transmitted Infection
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
5/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 1
Executive Summary
Examination of January to June 2011 and July to December 2010, Monthly Clinic
Summary Report (MCSR), Hospital Monthly Summary Report (HMSR) and Logistics
Management Information System (LMIS) data have contributed to the development ofthis report by the Department of Policy Formulation, Monitoring and Evaluation. This
examination revealed some key findings which included a decline in the estimated
number of Family Planning Acceptors by 6.8 percent, a decline in total visits to health
centres by 5.8 percent and a significant increase in condom distribution, coupled with a
decreased discontinuation rate of the condom (decrease of 25 percent).
The report constitutes both negative and positive developments as it relates to the Family
Planning Programme. In moving forward, however, the Board sees it as promising that
condom use, and as a result, Dual Method Use, has increased as this will lead to a further
decline in new cases of unplanned pregnancies and Sexually Transmitted Infections.
Although on a whole, total visits to health centres declined, it is promising to note that
male visits at Family Planning Clinics have increased. This may be attributed to the many
activities of the Board which also encompass outreach activities which have promoted the
importance of the male role in Family Planning.
Through strengthening the promotion of age- appropriate family planning services and
methods through the integration of Family Planning and HIV programme, it is envisioned
that in the future, an increase in family planning acceptors will be seen island-wide for
both genders.
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
6/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 2
Key Achievement and Observed Trends
1. There was an increase of 19.8 percent in the demand for Intra Uterine
Contraceptive Device (IUCD). Also, Jadelle reported an increase in the demand
by new acceptors.
2. The estimated number of FP acceptors declined from 71,697 for July - December
2010 to 66,807 for January - June 2011. This represented a decrease of 6.8percent.
3. FP acceptors using Sterilisation1
decreased from 4,120 (December 2010) to 3,550
(June 2011). The health regions that contributed to the decline were South-East,North-East and Western. There were no reported Sterilisation operations in the
parishes of Hanover and Westmoreland.
4. The movement in the percentage of all mothers at Post Natal Clinics whoaccepted FP for the period January - June 2011 compared to July - December
2010 was negligible. Seventy-eight percent of adolescent mothers accepted FP,which was three percentage points less than the previous six months.
5. Total visits to health centres decreased by approximately 5.8 percent. Adolescent
female visits to health clinics decreased from 15,285 t o 14,128.
6. Condom distribution to FP clients increased by 85.7 percent. On the other hand,
the distribution of the Pill declined by 25.7 percent.
7. The Discontinuation Rate for Condom and Pill decreased to 25 percent and 42
percent respectively, at the end of June 2011. Meanwhile, the DiscontinuationRate for Injection increased from 16 percent at the end of December 2010 to 26
percent at the end of June 2011.
8. A total of 31,434 persons were practising Dual Method Use during January toJune 2011 which represented a 26 percent increase compared to the 24,905
persons practising Dual Method Use in the period July to December 2010.
Adolescents practising Dual Method Use increased by approximately 21 percent.
1 Estimated procedures are calculated using the CYP.
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
7/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 3
Figure 1: Total Visits at Family Planning Facilities
11,560
132,921
8,144
145,242
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
Male Female
#ofVisits
Jan - Jun 2011 Jul - Dec 2010
The total number of visits to family planning facilities decreased from 153,386 in the July
- December 2010 period to 144,481 clients for the January - June 2011 period, which
represents a 5.8 percent decline in total visits. Figure 1 above shows that females
accounted for the majority of the visits at family planning facilities in both the June -
December 2010 and January - June 2011 periods. Male visits to health clinics in the
January - June 2011 period increased by 3,416 clients when compared to the previous six
months. However, female visits decreased by 12,321 to 132,921 by the end of the January
- June 2011 period. This represents an 8.5 percent decrease.
Figure 2: Male Visits at Family Planning Facilities
10041
12185
1367612652 12475
8144
11560
0
2000
4000
60008000
10000
12000
14000
16000
Jan -Jun
2008
Jul - Dec
2008
Jan - Jun
2009
Jul - Dec
2009
Jan -Jun
2010
Jul - Dec
2010
Jan - Jun
2011
#ofV
isits
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
8/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 4
Figure 2 shows that male visits at Family Planning facilities have fluctuated between
January - June 2008 and January - June 2011. The total male visits to health facilities
increased from 8,144 in the July - December 2010 period to 11,560 in the January - June
2011 period which represents an increase of 41.9 percent. All the regions reported
increases in male visits at Family Planning Clinics. The largest increase was seen in the
South-East region (99.6 percent) while the smallest increase was seen in the North-East(7.7 percent) (Table A).
Table A: Male Visits at Family Planning Centres by Regionfor the Period
January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
RegionMale
January - June2011
July - December2010 Change (%)
South-East 2,676 1,341 99.6
North-East 1,241 1,152 7.7
Western 4,253 2,902 46.6
Southern 3,390 2,749 23.3
Jamaica 11,560 8,144 41.9Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
9/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 5
Total female adolescent visits to health facilities during the period January - June 2011
decreased by 7.6 percent to 14,128 when compared to the 15,285 that visited in the
previous six months. The largest percentage decreases were observed in the parishes of
Clarendon, Westmoreland and Portland which declined by 30.7 percent, 21.6 percent and
18.2 percent respectively. On the other hand, there were increases in St Thomas of 23.5
percent and in St James of 14.0 percent (Table B).
Table C: Distribution of Commodities by Type to Regional OfficesJanuary to June 2011 & July December 2011 (LMIS data)
Commodity
Number Distributed
January - June2011 July - December2010 % Change
Pill 69,978 94,160 -25.7
Condom 2,232,450 1,201,876 85.7
IUCD 360 2,037 -82.3
Injectables 96,732 113,343 -14.7
Total 2,399,520 1,411,507 70.0
Source: NFPB LMIS Data, 2010 & 2011
Table B: Female Adolescent Visits to Health Clinics for the PeriodsJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010
January - June2011
July - December2010
Change(%)
KSA 3,279 3,729 -12.1
St. Thomas 558 452 23.5St. Catherine 2,611 2,581 1.2
Portland 365 446 -18.2
St. Mary 815 839 -2.9
St. Ann 918 1,003 -8.5
Trelawny 567 563 0.7
St. James 1,234 1,082 14.0
Hanover 469 488 -3.9
Westmoreland 936 1,194 -21.6
St. Elizabeth 711 821 -13.4
Manchester 702 697 0.7
Clarendon 963 1,390 -30.7
Total 14,128 15,285 -7.6
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
10/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 6
NFPB LMIS data shows that there was an increase in the distribution of overall
contraceptives from 1,411,507 in the July - December 2010 period to 2,399,520 in the
January June 2011 period, which represents an 70.0 percent increase. Condoms
increased by 1,030,574 (85.7 percent), while the distribution of IUCD, Pill and
Injectables declined by 1,677 (82.3 percent), 24,182 (25.7 percent) and 16,611 (14.7
percent) respectively. Condoms were the most distributed commodity in both periods,
while IUCD was the least (Table C).
An examination of Table D reveals that the estimated users of Family Planning services
for the period January - June 2011 declined by 4.1 percent from 71,697 in July -
December 2010 to 68,780 in the January - June 2011 period. Three methods (Condom,
IUCD and Implant) saw increases in their estimated users in the January - June 2011
period when compared to the July - December 2010 period. Condom saw the largest
2Estimated users are calculated using the CYP.The CYP is calculated by multiplying or dividing the quantity of each method distributed to clients by a conversion factor, to yield an
estimate of the duration of contraceptive protection provided per unit of that method. The calculation takes into account that somemethods, like condoms and oral contraceptives, for example, may be used incorrectly and then discarded, or that IUDs and implants
may be removed before their life span is realised.
Conversion Factor:IUD x 2.3
Pill 7.5
Condom - 60Injection - 2
Implant x 1.9
Sterilisation x5
Table D: Estimated Users2 of Family Planning Methods and Procedure for the PeriodsJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Method January - June 2011 July - December 2010 Change (%)
Pill 6,427 7,468 -13.9Injection 44,905 51,540 -12.9
Condom 9,867 5,190 90.1
IUD 3,820 3,262 17.1
Implant 211 117 80.3
Sterilisation 3,550 4,120 -13.8
Total 68,780 71,697 -4.1
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
11/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 7
percent increase of 90.1 percent, while Implant saw an 80.3 percent increase followed by
IUCD which saw a 17.1 percent increase. Pill, Injection and Sterilisation use decreased
by 13.9 percent, 12.9 percent and 13.8 percent respectively. Injection was the most used
Family Planning method while Implant was the least used.
Table E shows the total distribution of IUCD, Implant and ECP to clients combined
decreased from 1,996 in the July to December 2010 period to 1,831 for the January to
June 2011 period. This reduction was mainly due to a 10.9 percent decline in IUCD
distribution for the period. Only Implant registered an increase between the two periods
(65.7 percent) while IUCD and ECP both decreased by 10.9 percent and 9.2 percent
respectively.
Table E: Number of IUCD, Implant & ECP Units Distributed to ClientsJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010 (MCSR data)
MethodJanuary - June
2011July - December
2010 Change (%)
IUCD 1,661 1,864 -10.9
Implant 111 67 65.7
ECP 59 65 -9.2
Total 1,831 1,996 -8.3
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2008 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
12/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 8
Figure 3: Discontinuation RateOf Supply Methods
2008 - 2011
13
46
33
62
7
28 30
40
24
4742
19
111613
26
11
16
0
10
20
30
40
5060
70
Jul - Dec 2008 Jan - Jun 2009 Jul - Dec 2009 Jan - Jun 2010 Jul - Dec 2010 Jan - Jun 2011
Period
Percent
Condom Pill Injection
The Discontinuation Rate for all three methods of contraceptive fluctuated between the
July - December 2008 and January - June 2011 periods. Both Condom and Pill
Discontinuation Rates3
decreased between the July - December and January - June 2011
periods, while the contraceptive Injections Discontinuation Rate increased when the two
periods are compared. The Discontinuation Rate for Condom saw the highest change
when compared to the other two contraceptives declining considerably by 55 per cent
from 62 per cent in July - December 2010 to 7 percent in the January - June 2011 period.
This shows that fewer FP clients have discontinued use of this method. The rate for the
Pill decreased marginally from 47 percent to 42 percent for the period under review
(Figure 3). However, more clients have discontinued use of the Injection since the Rate
has increased from 16 percent to 26 percent (Table F).
3Calculation for Discontinuation Rate = Step 1: Estimated Users (Jan to June 2011) [Estimated Users (July to Dec 2010) + New
Acceptors (Jan to June 2011)] x 100. Step 2: Subtract total from 100.
Table F: Discontinuation Rates for Supply Methods at Regular Intervals, 2008 - 2011
January - June2011
July - December2010
January - June2010
July - December2009
January - June2009
July - December2008
Condom 7 62 33 46 13 13
Pill 42 47 24 40 30 28
Injection 26 16 11 19 16 11
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
13/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 9
There was a slight increase in the proportion of mothers at PNCs who accepted Family
Planning services. Of the 15,310 mothers receiving Postnatal Services in the January -
June 2011, 11,228 accepted Family Planning services. In the July - December period
12,038 accepted Family Planning of the 16,457 that received Postnatal Services. Thus the
totals moved from 73.1 percent to 73.3 percent for the January - June 2011 period when
compared to the previous six months. On a regional level, the South-East and Western
regions reported increases of 4.2 percent and 3 percent respectively for the proportion of
mothers who accepted FP services at Postnatal Clinics. Conversely the other two regions
namely Southern and North-East, declined by 7.7 percent and 2 percent respectively
(Table G).
Table G: Number & Percentage of Mothers Receiving Postnatal Care and Accepting Family Planning (FP) at Postnatal Clinics,January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Number Receiving PostnatalServices
Number Accepting Family PlanningMethods Percentage Accepting
January - June
2011
July - December
2010
January - June
2011
July - December
2010
January - June
2011
July - December
2010South-East 5,752 6,338 4,364 4,547 75.9 71.7
KSA 2,633 3,119 2,042 2,336 77.6 74.9
St. Thomas 517 495 375 367 72.5 74.1
St. Catherine 2,602 2,724 1,947 1,844 74.8 67.7
North-East 2,267 2,518 1,671 1,906 73.7 75.7
Portland 452 482 294 367 65.0 76.1
St. Mary 729 804 546 614 74.9 76.4
St. Ann 1,086 1,232 831 925 76.5 75.1
Western 3,686 3,808 3,052 3,040 82.8 79.8
Trelawny 539 609 461 506 85.5 83.1
St. James 1,503 1,500 1,261 1,192 83.9 79.5
Hanover 552 533 465 462 84.2 86.7
Westmoreland 1,092 1,166 865 880 79.2 75.5
Southern 3,605 3,793 2,141 2,545 59.4 67.1
St. Elizabeth 1,030 977 711 705 69.0 72.2
Manchester 1,074 1,108 634 705 59.0 63.6
Clarendon 1,501 1,708 796 1,135 53.0 66.5
Total 15,310 16,457 11,228 12,038 73.3 73.1
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
14/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 10
Table H reveals that the number of adolescent mothers receiving Postnatal services
decreased by 137 from 3,259 in July - December 2010 to 3,122 in January - June 2011.
Meanwhile, during the January - June 2011 period 2,433 adolescent mothers accepted a
FP method at Postnatal Clinic (PNC), a decrease of 207 when compared to the 2,640 in
the July - December 2010 period. For the January - June 2011 period, the most adolescent
mothers receiving Postnatal Care at PNC was observed in the South-East region at 1,151
while the least was 450 in the North-East. The South-East and North-East regions saw the
most and least adolescent mothers accepting FP at PNC respectively (Table H).
Table H: Number & Percentage of Adolescent Mothers Receiving Postnatal Care & Accepting FP atPNCs January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Number ReceivingPostnatal Services
Number Accepting FamilyPlanning Methods % Accepting
LocationJan - Jun
2011Jul - Dec
2010Jan - Jun
2011Jul - Dec
2010Jan - Jun
2011Jul - Dec
2010
Jamaica 3,122 3,259 2,433 2,640 78 81
South-East 1,151 1,272 946 1,022 82 80
KSA 570 667 453 534 79 80
St. Thomas 110 104 89 85 81 82
St. Catherine 471 501 404 403 86 80
North-East 450 472 367 394 82 83
Portland 83 104 66 92 80 88
St. Mary 157 161 131 132 83 82
St. Ann 210 207 170 170 81 82
Western 774 807 668 702 86 87
Trelawny 114 130 102 111 89 85
St. James 312 293 277 255 89 87
Hanover 117 101 102 93 87 92
Westmoreland 231 283 187 243 81 86
Southern 747 708 452 522 61 74
St. Elizabeth 198 173 138 134 70 77
Manchester 208 192 141 141 68 73
Clarendon 341 343 173 247 51 72
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
15/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 11
2428 26
24
1720
41
33
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Percent
South-East North-East Western Southern
Regions
Figure 4: Percentage of Postnatal Clients not Accepting Family Planning by
Health Regions for January - June 2011 & July -December 2010
Jan - Jun 2011 Jul - Dec 2010
As seen in Figure 4, two regions saw an increase in the percentage of mothers not
accepting family planning. For the January - June 2011 period, there was a marked
increase of 8 percent of the total number of Postnatal clients not accepting Family
Planning in the Southern region when compared to the July - December 2010 period. The
Postnatal clients not accepting FP in the North-East region increased by 2 percent at the
end of January - June 2011 period. However, both the South-East and Western regions
reported declines moving from 28 percent to 24 percent and from 20 percent to 17
percent respectively.
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
16/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 12
Table I: Number of Dual Method Users by Region and Age Group forJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Region
TotalAge Groups
10 - 19 20 - 29 30+
Jan - Jun
2011
Jul - Dec
2010
%
Change
Jan - Jun
2011
Jul - Dec
2010
Jan - Jun
2011
Jul - Dec
2010
Jan - Jun
2011
Jul - Dec
2010South-East 19,001 12,588 51 2,560 1,735 8,836 5,886 7,605 4,96North-East 4,361 4,460 -2 614 669 2,229 2,192 1,518 1,59
Western 4,228 3,091 37 747 642 2,146 1,575 1,335 87
Southern 3,844 4,767 -19 466 596 1,682 2,127 1,696 2,04
Total 31,434 24,906 26 4,387 3,642 14,893 11,780 12,154 9,48
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
Table I shows that the total number of persons practising Dual Method Use increased
from 24,906 in the July - December 2010 period to 31,434 in January - June 2011 period.
This represents an increase of 26.2 percent. All age groups saw an increase in Dual
Method Use in the January - June 2011 period when compared to the July December
2010 period. The least number of persons practising Dual Method Use were in the
adolescent age group, while the 20 - 29 age group had the highest number of persons
practising Dual Method Use.
60
51
14 18
13 12 1219
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Percent
South-East North-East Western Southern
Regions
Figure 5: Percentage Distribution of Dual Method Use by Region
Jan - Jun 2011 Jul - Dec 2010
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
17/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 13
The percentage distribution of the Dual Method Use is outlined in Figure 5. As seen in
Figure 5, two regions saw an increase in the percentage of persons practising Dual
Method Use. For the January - June 2011 period, there was an increase of 9 percent when
compared to the previous six months in the South-East region followed by an increase of
1 percent in the Western region. However, both the North-East and South regions
reported declines by 4 percent and 7 percent respectively.
Table J shows a declining trend for most methods of contraception in the January - June
2011 period when compared to the corresponding periods in 2010 and 2009. A total of
18,966 New Family Planning Acceptors used all Methods of Contraception in the
January - June 2011 period which represented a 0.3 percent decrease when compared to
the 19,027 used in the July - December 2010 period. All contraceptive methods recorded
a decline in new acceptors excluding the Condom, IUCD and Jadelle methods of
contraception. For the January - June 2011 period, the number of new acceptors using
Condom increased by 45.1 percent to 5,375 when compared to the period July -
December 2010. Both the Pill and Injection declined by 12.4 percent and 12.5 percent
respectively for the review period (Table J).
Table J: New Family Planning Acceptors by Method of Contraception at Regular Intervals - July 2008 to June 2011
Methods January - June
2011
July - December
2010
January - June
2010
July - December
2009
January - June
2009
July - December
2008All Methods 18,966 19,027 20,166 18,581 21,614 19,985
Pill 3,531 4,032 4,511 4,198 5,546 4,572
Injection 9,406 10,755 10,874 10,098 10,469 10,457
IUCD 551 460 570 344 518 372
Norplant/Jadelle 95 59 5 2 10 81
ECP 8 16 6 146 390 290
Condom 5,375 3,705 4,200 3,793 4,681 4,258
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2008 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
18/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 14
From Table K, the total number of new acceptors of contraceptive by method was
18,966. The largest numbers of new acceptors for all contraceptives were in the parishes
of Kingston and St Andrew (4,083) followed by St Catherine (3,090) and Clarendon
(1,678). The smallest numbers of new acceptors were observed in the parishes of
Portland (401), St Thomas (585) and Trelawny (659). The injection was the most used
method of contraception in KSA and for all parishes except St James and St Elizabeth,
while the least used method of contraception was the ECP.
Overall the number of Jadelle users has steadily increased since it was introduced in2010. For the period January - June 2011, a total of 551 new acceptors used IUCD. This
represents an increase of 19.8 percent when compared with the 460 which used IUCD in
the July - December period. Most acceptors of IUCD (287) for the January - June 2011
period were within the 20 - 29 age group followed by the 30 and over age group which
saw 205 users, while only 59 users were from the 10 - 19 age group (Table L).
Table K: New Acceptors of Contraceptive by Method by Parish, January - June 2011
Parish Pill Injection IUCD Norplant ECP Condom Total
KSA 425 2,484 145 65 0 964 4,083
St Thomas 149 290 30 0 0 116 585
St Catherine 681 1,823 71 0 0 515 3,090
Portland 69 206 7 0 0 119 401
St Mary 197 457 18 0 3 315 990
St Ann 198 644 9 30 1 436 1,318
Trelawny 157 334 63 0 4 101 659
St James 490 467 85 0 0 620 1,662
Hanover 210 275 25 0 0 176 686
Westmoreland 250 709 61 0 0 381 1,401
St Elizabeth 337 393 0 0 0 490 1,220
Manchester 230 551 20 0 0 392 1,193
Clarendon 138 773 17 0 0 750 1,678
Total 3,531 9,406 551 95 8 5,375 18,966
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2011
Table L: New Acceptors of Implant & IUCD by Age Group for January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
January - June 2011 July - December 2010
10 - 19 20 - 29 30+ Total 10 - 19 20 - 29 30+ Total
Implant (Jadelle) 9 46 40 95 5 37 17 59
IUCD 59 287 205 551 47 249 164 460
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
19/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 15
A total of 95 new acceptors utilised the contraceptive Jadelle which represents a 61.0
percent increase in the January - June 2011 period when compared to July - December
2010. For the January - June 2011 period, the 20 - 29 age cohort increased from 37 to 46
Jadelle users when compared to July - December 2010, meanwhile for the 30 and over
age cohort the increase in Jadelle users was from 17 to 40. Nine individuals in the 10-19
age group were new acceptors of the Implant in the period January - June 2011 when
compared to 5 new acceptors in the July - December 2010 period. (Table L).
A total of 3,550 sterilisation acceptors4
were recorded for January - June 2011
representing a decline of 13.8 percent when compared to the observed 4,120 in July -
December 2010. This is due to declines in all regions except the Southern region, which
4 The number of Sterilisation Acceptors was calculated by multiplying the number of Sterilisation Procedures by 5.
Table M: Sterilisation Procedures & Acceptors per Region forJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Procedures Acceptors
January - June2011
July - December2010
January - June2011
July - December2010
South-East 346 420 1,730 2,100
KSA 162 170 810 850
St. Thomas 19 52 95 260
St. Catherine 165 198 825 990
North-East 114 145 570 725
Portland 13 23 65 115
St. Mary 47 58 235 290
St. Ann 54 64 270 320
Western 86 124 430 620Trelawny 15 0 75 0
St. James 71 124 355 620
Hanover 0 0 0 0
Westmoreland 0 0 0 0
Southern 164 135 820 675
St. Elizabeth 11 20 55 100
Manchester 102 87 510 435
Clarendon 51 28 255 140
Total 710 824 3,550 4,120
Source: MoH HMSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
20/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 16
reported an increase in acceptors from 675 to 820 for the period under review. The
parishes which contributed to the increase in the Southern region were Manchester and
Clarendon. On the other hand, the parishes that reported the largest decreases in acceptors
were St Elizabeth, Portland and St Thomas. Of note, Trelawny recorded 75 acceptors,
after none was reported in the previous six months (Table M).
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
21/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 17
Next Steps
Total Number of Mothers Including Adolescent Mothers Accepting Family
Planning
Three quarters (73.3%) of mothers receiving postnatal services in Postnatal Clinics also
accepted Family Planning methods in the January June 2011 period; while 26.7 percent
did not accept. Of the total accepting mothers, 20.4 percent were adolescent mothers, and
77.9 percent accepted FP as well which is less than the 81 percent that accepted in the
July- December period. Every effort should be made to encourage all mothers, especially
adolescent mothers receiving postnatal services to accept FP as well, so as to achieve the
national objective of maintaining a stable and healthy population. It would have beenfavourable to have a higher percentage of adolescent mothers accepting FP methods at
PNCs. Measures need to be put in place to ensure higher acceptance of Family Planning
methods by adolescent mothers.
One possible measure is to offer FP methods to adolescent mothers when they attend
clinics to immunise their child/ children. Likewise, since many adolescents source
contraceptives in the private sector such as pharmacies, an adolescent friendly
environment needs to be provided to encourage adolescents, especially adolescent
mothers to request contraceptive without fear of being ridiculed. Ensuring that
information on Reproductive Health is made available to adolescents in the most basic
form in schools, churches, the media and health centres, among others, can assist in
increasing contraceptive use among adolescents as well.
Another issue that requires urgent attention is the abstinence alone message. The
Ministry of Healths and the Ministry of Educations policies focus on a promotion of
abstinence among adolescents. However, the promotion of abstinence alone will not
reap the desired results. The promotion of contraceptive use among adolescents continues
to be indispensable. A decision needs to be made as to whether the abstinence alone
message will be re-examined so as to take into consideration the fact that a large number
of adolescents in the school system are sexually active and are having unprotected sex.
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
22/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 18
Estimated Users of Family Planning Methods and Procedures
It was observed that the estimated users of Family Planning methods and proceduresdeclined by 4.1 percent. The pill, injection, and sterilisation contributed to the overall
decline in estimated users of FP in the period under review. Interest in sterilisation among
women has been declining since the 1997 RHS. The 2008 RHS found that even among
women aged 15- 49 who wanted no more children, interest in sterilisation was low. Main
reasons given for not wanting to use sterilisation were because of their age, preference to
use other method of contraception, fear of the surgery, fear of side effects after surgery,
and because of uncertainty about future fertility preferences. As it relates to the pill,
because most users source this method in the private sector, it would be helpful to
understand whether there was a decline at the private sector level as well. Data from the
2008 RHS shows that at the national level pill use has been declining steadily since the
1997 RHS.
The injection and the condom remained the preferred methods of contraceptive since both
have been the most well-known of all methods since 1989. It is likewise not surprising
that implants were the least used method in both periods especially because implants are
costly and are only offered at a few selected Family Planning sites in Jamaica. However,
the National Family Planning Board could consider increasing the promotion of implants
by providing more information to women in the areas that the services are available.
Unlike other methods that require daily use and are more short-term, implants are
effective up to five years and could satisfy the long-term Family Planning needs of
reproductive age women especially for those in the medical eligibility criteria that
restricts the use of a product with oestrogen.
Dual Method Use
Twenty-six point two (26.2) percent more clients were using more than one method of
contraceptive (dual method users) at a time. Dual method use increased in all age cohorts
with the majority of users being in the 20-29 age cohorts, while the 10-19 age cohorts had
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
23/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 19
the least amount of dual method users. The fact that dual method use increased by 20.5
percent in the 10-19 age cohort is encouraging given the fact that risky behaviour in this
age cohort has always been a major health problem for health providers and policy
makers alike. Every effort should be made to encourage the 10-19 age cohorts to continue
practicing dual method use.
Even though many persons might view it as expensive and inconvenient to add condoms
to a method of contraception that is highly effective in preventing pregnancies, the fact is
these methods provide no protection against the spread of Sexually Transmitted
Infections. Dual method use remains the only approach to contraceptive use that is
effective in preventing the spread of STIs, preventing unplanned pregnancies, as well as
in providing a defence against the threat of infertility. The NFPB and its functionariesshould continue to emphasise to the sexually active population the importance of dual
method use for dual protection against STIs and unplanned pregnancies.
Male Visits at Family Planning Clinics
Females, as is expected accounted for the majority of the visits to Family Planning
Clinics in both periods. However, whereas the total number of females visiting Family
Planning Clinics decreased by 8.5 percent, visits by males to FPCs increased by 42
percent when the two periods are compared. The statistics are encouraging given the fact
that traditionally, Reproductive Health has always been deemed to be a womans
responsibility. Because sexually active men and women have to contend with more than
just unplanned pregnancies, but now have to contend with STIs including the deadly
HIV/AIDS disease, it is imperative that both women and men alike be just as involved in
Family Planning decision making, and that men continue to see the importance of their
involvement in the process as well.
The health providers at clinics will need to focus their attention on providing an
environment that is conducive to mens participation (male friendly) in the process. Plans
need to be put in place that will provide men with more information on the variety of
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
24/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 20
contraceptive choices available for both they and women, the negative consequences of
failure to use contraceptive, among others. It is germane that Reproductive Health
programmes be developed and implemented in an unbiased way so that men can be
incorporated in the Family Planning decision making process. These actions will allow
men to understand their importance in the Family Planning process; could help reduce the
number of unplanned pregnancies, and the spread of STIs; as well as allow men to realise
that they are just as entitled to Reproductive Health services as their female counterparts.
Condom Distribution
A number of positive indicators were seen from the data gathered: condom distribution
by the NFPB to FPCs increased by 92 percent, and the number of estimated users ofcondoms almost doubled when the two periods are compared. Of the three most used
methods of contraceptives (injection, condom, and pill), the Discontinuation Rate for
Condom saw the most change when compared to other methods, which is evidence that
more users are continuing to use condoms consistently. Likewise, the total number of
condoms distributed to STI clients has increased by 17.1 percent in the latter six months
when compared to the former six months.
The fact that every STI clients are issued condoms when they visit public sector clinics is
a practice that should continue so as to prevent the spread of STIs to other uninfected
clients, while meeting the FP needs of this group. Three regions observed increase in
condom distribution to STI clients except for the Southern region. Steps have to be taken
to ensure a consistent and adequate distribution of condoms in all regions in an effort to
reduce the spread of STIs.
Overall though, the fact that sexually active persons are continuing to use condom, and
more condoms are being made available to STI clients is welcoming news given the fact
that the condom remains the only method of contraception that is effective in preventing
pregnancies as well as the spread of STIs. The NFPB therefore needs to continue to
endorse programmes that focus on the promotion of condom use among the reproductive
age group in all regions.
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
25/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 21
APPENDICES
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
26/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 22
Appendix I: New Acceptors for January - June 2011 &July - December 2010
ParishJanuary - June
2011July - December
2010
KSA 4,083 4,037
St. Thomas 585 535
St. Catherine 3,090 2,929
Portland 401 528
St. Mary 990 1,066
St. Ann 1,318 1,394
Trelawny 659 725
St. James 1,662 1,638
Hanover 686 588
Westmoreland 1,401 1,396
St. Elizabeth 1,220 1,110
Manchester 1,193 1,181
Clarendon 1,678 1,900
Total 18,966 19,027
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
27/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 23
Appendix II: Commodities Distributed to Clients of the Family Planning Programme for January - June 2011
Parish/Region Pill Injection Condom IUD Implant ECP
South-East 18,820 45,848 227,546 543 71 0
KSA 6,446 24,630 128,073 433 71 0
St. Thomas 2,579 3,363 35,324 36 0 0
St. Catherine 9,795 17,855 64,149 74 0 0
North-East 6,563 14,635 88,073 138 39 54
Portland 809 2,986 11,302 27 0 0
St. Mary 1,819 5,097 33,476 24 0 4
St. Ann 3,935 6,552 43,295 87 39 54
Western 11,952 15,707 147,704 795 1 5
Trelawny 2,402 3,978 32,211 556 0 5
St. James 4,037 3,930 47,550 92 0 0
Hanover 3,187 2,711 38,514 31 1 0Westmoreland 2,326 5,088 29,429 116 0 0
Southern 10,869 13,619 128,700 185 0 0
St. Elizabeth 6,865 4,409 43,252 74 0 0
Manchester 2,482 4,245 38,690 92 0 0
Clarendon 1,522 4,965 46,758 19 0 0
Jamaica 48,204 89,809 592,023 1,661 111 59
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
28/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 24
Appendix III: Attendance at Family Planning Clinics for January - June 2011 by Gender and RegionCompared with July - December 2010
Region
Total Male Female
Jan - Jun2011
Jul - Dec2010
Jan - Jun2011
Jul - Dec2010
Jan - Jun2011
Jul - Dec2010
South-East 63,010 63,912 2,676 1,341 60,334 62,571
North-East 21,712 22,721 1,241 1,152 20,471 21,569
Western 30,822 30,501 4,253 2902 26,569 27,599
Southern 28,937 36,252 3,390 2,749 25,547 33,503
Total 144,481 153,386 11,560 8,144 132,921 145,242
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
29/30
NFPB Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report, January June 2011 25
Appendix IV: Male Visits by Parish and Region forJanuary - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Parish/RegionJanuary - June
2011July - December
2010
South-East 2,676 1,341
KSA 1,440 761St. Thomas 213 101
St. Catherine 1,023 479
North-East 1,241 1,152
Portland 100 185
St. Mary 825 700
St. Ann 316 267
Western 4,253 2,902
Trelawny 1,170 832
St. James 1,480 923
Hanover 816 867
Westmoreland 787 280
Southern 3,390 2,749
St. Elizabeth 1,256 1,114
Manchester 596 436
Clarendon 1,538 1,199
Jamaica 11,560 8,144
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011
-
8/13/2019 Semi-Annual Family Planning Statistical Report (January to June 2011)
30/30
Appendix V: Condom Distribution to STI Clients by Region andParish for
January - June 2011 & July - December 2010
Parish/RegionJanuary - June
2011July - December
2010
South-East 56,933 25,791
KSA 36,935 18,402St. Thomas 1,190 296
St. Catherine 18,808 7,093
North-East 39,728 31,546
Portland 4,993 6,178
St. Mary 3,883 3,565
St. Ann 30,852 21,803
Western 41,909 39,774
Trelawny 9,961 11,095
St. James 19,192 12,368
Hanover 10,166 13,989
Westmoreland 2,590 2,322
Southern 25,608 43,145
St. Elizabeth 7,422 29,391
Manchester 3,927 8,655
Clarendon 14,259 5,099
Jamaica 164,178 140,256
Source: MoH MCSR Data, 2010 & 2011