SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of...

32
The Study Secretariat, Department of Energy Technology SEMESTER EVALUATION AUTUMN SEMESTER 2019 June 2020

Transcript of SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of...

Page 1: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

T h e S t u d y S e c r e t a r i a t , D e p a r t m e n t o f E n e r g y T e c h n o l o g y

SEMESTER EVALUATION AUTUMN SEMESTER 2019

June 2020

Page 2: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

2

Table of contents

1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 4

1.1 Contents of the report ...................................................................................................................................................................4

1.2 Follow-up on the results ................................................................................................................................................................4

2. Response rate E19 ................................................................................................................................. 5

3. Semester evaluation .............................................................................................................................. 6

3.1: 1st semester ..................................................................................................................................................................................6

3.2: 3rd semester .................................................................................................................................................................................6

3.3: 5th semester .................................................................................................................................................................................7

3.4: 7th semester .................................................................................................................................................................................7

3.5: 9th semester .................................................................................................................................................................................8

4. Project Evaluation ................................................................................................................................. 9

4.1 How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its learning goals? .......................................9

4.1.1: 1st semester .........................................................................................................................................................................9

4.1.2: 3rd semester .......................................................................................................................................................................10

4.1.3: 5th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................10

4.1.4: 7th semester ......................................................................................................................................................................11

4.1.5: 9th semester ......................................................................................................................................................................11

4.2 How well do you think the project framework (group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals

of the project? ...................................................................................................................................................................................12

4.2.1: 1st semester .......................................................................................................................................................................12

4.2.2: 3rd semester .......................................................................................................................................................................12

4.2.3: 5th semester ......................................................................................................................................................................13

4.2.4: 7th semester ......................................................................................................................................................................13

4.2.5: 9th semester ......................................................................................................................................................................14

4.3 How do you rate your own effort during the project phase as a whole? ....................................................................................15

4.3.1: 1st semester .......................................................................................................................................................................15

4.3.2: 3rd semester .......................................................................................................................................................................15

4.3.3: 5th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................16

4.3.4: 7th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................16

4.3.5: 9th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................17

4.4: How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic

challenges? .......................................................................................................................................................................................18

4.4.1: 1st semester .......................................................................................................................................................................18

4.4.2: 3rd semester .......................................................................................................................................................................18

4.4.3: 5th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................19

4.4.4: 7th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................19

4.4.5: 9th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................20

Page 3: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

3

4.5 How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a method to solve bigger, academic assignments

within the given timeframe? .............................................................................................................................................................21

4.5.1: 1st semester .......................................................................................................................................................................21

4.5.2: 3rd semester .......................................................................................................................................................................21

4.5.3: 5th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................22

4.5.4: 7th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................22

4.5.5: 9th semester .......................................................................................................................................................................23

5. Voluntary Traineeship ......................................................................................................................... 24

5.1 How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its learning goals? .....................................24

5.2 How much have you learned about the organisational structure and the work of an organisation seen from an

engineering/managerial perspective? ..............................................................................................................................................24

5.3 How do you rate your own effort during the project phase as a whole? ....................................................................................25

5.4 How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle challenges in an

external organisation? ......................................................................................................................................................................25

6. Study Environment .............................................................................................................................. 26

6.1 The premises are suitable for teaching (equipment, indoor climate, interior design, etc.) .........................................................26

6.1.1: Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester .......................................................................................................................................26

6.1.2: Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester ........................................................................................................................................26

6.2 Student workspaces are available to support the academic environment of my degree programme and campus in general ...27

6.2.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester ........................................................................................................................................27

6.2.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester .........................................................................................................................................27

6.3 The university offers good social facilities and spaces for taking breaks and socialising with fellow students...........................28

6.3.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester ........................................................................................................................................28

6.3.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester .........................................................................................................................................28

6.4 I feel comfortable in my chosen degree programme ..................................................................................................................29

6.4.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester ........................................................................................................................................29

6.4.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester .........................................................................................................................................29

6.5 I feel that there is a great sense of community in my degree programme .................................................................................30

6.5.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester ........................................................................................................................................30

6.5.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester .........................................................................................................................................30

6.6 I feel that there is a great academic community in my degree programme ...............................................................................31

6.6.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester ........................................................................................................................................31

6.6.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester .........................................................................................................................................31

Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................................................32

Page 4: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

4

1. Introduction

1.1 Contents of the report This report contains the quantitative data from the semester evaluation of the autumn semester 2019. The qualitative data has been processed internally and in confidentiality by the Study Board for Energy. The quantitative data concerning the evaluation of all the courses and the questions regarding harassment and abusive behavior have been processed in confidentiality and will not be reproduced in this report.

1.2 Follow-up on the results

Overall, the evaluation shows that the students are predominantly satisfied with their study programmes and their study environment. In this evaluation there is a marked improvement in how the students have evaluated the physical study environment in Aalborg compared to the two earlier evaluations. This could be attributed to the move away from the group rooms in Fibigerstræde 2p and Kroghstræde 6. However, there are still a few complaints especially regarding the indoor climate in Badehusvej/Strandvejen and the noise levels in Fib15. AAU is currently doing an inspection into the indoor climate and the climate will be regulated in 2020 with the current ventilation system. In the coming years AAU will explore whether further investments are needed. If the problems persist, please continue to notify us. Regarding Fib15, the Department is currently exploring whether to continue with having group rooms in this location, but it is very difficult to find and finance alternative locations. In the evaluation of the social aspects of the study environment some students have noted that they would like more social activities across groups and study programmes and better integration of the international students. Because of this, the Study Board has formed a committee to help facilitate more social activities. In addition, the students have pointed out some issues regarding some of the courses. These issues have been handled by the Study Board in cooperation with the teachers in question and the semester coordinators. It is also worth pointing out that many of the courses were evaluated very favorably by the students and given praise in the comments. The positive comments have also been communicated to the relevant teachers by the Study Board.

Page 5: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

5

2. Response rate E19

Study programme Responses Students Response rate

DS5 - Esbjerg 1 3 33,3%

ED5 - Esbjerg 4 9 44,4%

EE5 - Aalborg 4 6 66,7%

EN3 - Aalborg 32 45 71,1%

EN3 - Esbjerg 2 18 11,1%

EN1 - Aalborg 56 63 88,9%

EN1 - Esbjerg 4 12 33,3%

AIE1 - Esbjerg 5 13 38,5%

AIE3 - Esbjerg 0 7 0,0%

ME5, MED5 15 27 55,6%

TE5, TED5 12 15 80,0%

TP5 0 1 0,0%

ESPH1 6 15 40,0%

EPSH3 2 18 11,1%

HYTEC1 0 2 0,0%

IRS3 0 1 0,0%

MCE1 8 19 42,1%

MCE3 4 18 22,2%

OES7 2 2 100,0%

OES9 2 11 18,2%

PECT7 1 2 50,0%

PECT9 5 7 71,4%

PED1 7 17 41,2%

PED3 4 16 25,0%

TEPE1 10 22 45,5%

TEPE3 6 14 42,9%

WPS1 1 6 16,7%

WPS3 1 3 33,3%

Sum 194 392 49,5%

Esbjerg 26 86 30,2%

Aalborg 168 306 54,9%

Page 6: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

6

3. Semester evaluation

3.1: 1st semester

3.2: 3rd semester

6

2

2

47

3

2

3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

Energi, Esbjerg

Energi, Aalborg

Overall, how do you assess the past semester?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

1 27 2 2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Energi, Aalborg

Overall, how do you assess the past semester?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 7: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

7

3.3: 5th semester

3.4: 7th semester

1

1

6

1

1

4

8

6

2

4 2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DS

EE

Elektronik og datateknik

ME

TE

Overall, how do you assess the past semester?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

1

2

1

3

5

5

2

6

3

1

1

1

3 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

Overall, how do you assess the past semester?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 8: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

8

3.5: 9th semester

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

2

1

2

3

1

2

2

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

Overall, how do you assess the past semester?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 9: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

9

4. Project Evaluation

4.1 How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its learning goals?

4.1.1: 1st semester

1

1

16

3

3

35

1

5

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

Energi, Esbjerg

Energi, Aalborg

1. How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its

learning goals?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 10: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

10

4.1.2: 3rd semester

4.1.3: 5th semester

11 17 4

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Energi, Aalborg

1. How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its

learning goals?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

1

4

4

7

3

6

2

1

5

3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DS

EE

Elektronik og datateknik

ME

TE

1. How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its

learning goals?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 11: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

11

4.1.4: 7th semester

4.1.5: 9th semester

1

3

1

3

3

4

4

1

3

6

1

1

1

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

1. How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its

learning goals?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

1. How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its

learning goals?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 12: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

12

4.2 How well do you think the project framework (group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals of the project?

4.2.1: 1st semester

4.2.2: 3rd semester

1

20

3

2

28

2

1

6 2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

Energi, Esbjerg

Energi, Aalborg

2. How well do you think the project framework

(group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals of the project?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

7 22 3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Energi, Aalborg

2. How well do you think the project framework

(group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals of the project?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 13: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

13

4.2.3: 5th semester

4.2.4: 7th semester

1

2

5

7

1

2

5

5

1

2

5

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DS

EE

Elektronik og datateknik

ME

TE

2. How well do you think the project framework

(group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals of the project?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

3

3

1

1

5

1

2

1

2

4

1

2

2

4

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

2. How well do you think the project framework

(group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals of the project?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 14: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

14

4.2.5: 9th semester

1

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

2. How well do you think the project framework

(group work, guidance, scale etc.) has contributed to satisfy the learning goals of the project?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 15: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

15

4.3 How do you rate your own effort during the project phase as a whole?

4.3.1: 1st semester

4.3.2: 3rd semester

2

2

10

3

1

35 9

1

2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

Energi, Esbjerg

Energi, Aalborg

3. How do you rate your own effort during the

project phase as a whole?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

13 16 3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Energi, Aalborg

3. How do you rate your own effort during the

project phase as a whole?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 16: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

16

4.3.3: 5th semester

4.3.4: 7th semester

1

4

2

8

3

2

5

5

2

3 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DS

EE

Elektronik og datateknik

ME

TE

3. How do you rate your own effort during the

project phase as a whole?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

2

1

2

4

3

7

2

1

5

6

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

3. How do you rate your own effort during the

project phase as a whole?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 17: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

17

4.3.5: 9th semester

1

2

3

1

1

2

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

3. How do you rate your own effort during the

project phase as a whole?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 18: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

18

4.4: How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic challenges?

4.4.1: 1st semester

4.4.2: 3rd semester

1

5

1

2

20

2

1

24

2

6 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

Energi, Esbjerg

Energi, Aalborg

4. How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching

has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic challenges?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

5 12 14 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Energi, Aalborg

4. How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching

has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic challenges?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 19: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

19

4.4.3: 5th semester

4.4.4: 7th semester

1

5

3

2

5

3

1

1

2

7

4

1 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DS

EE

Elektronik og datateknik

ME

TE

4. How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching

has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic challenges?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

2

2

1

2

4

1

3

2

2

4

2

1

2

4

2

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

4. How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching

has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic challenges?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 20: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

20

4.4.5: 9th semester

1

1

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

4. How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching

has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle academic challenges?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 21: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

21

4.5 How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a method to solve bigger, academic assignments within the given timeframe?

4.5.1: 1st semester

4.5.2: 3rd semester

1

2

12

2

1

33

2

1

9 2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

Energi, Esbjerg

Energi, Aalborg

5. How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a

method to solve bigger, academic assignments within the given timeframe?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

5 21 5 1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Energi, Aalborg

5. How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a

method to solve bigger, academic assignments within the given timeframe?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 22: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

22

4.5.3: 5th semester

4.5.4: 7th semester

1

6

5

2

2

5

5

1

2

1

3

2

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

DS

EE

Elektronik og datateknik

ME

TE

5. How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a

method to solve bigger, academic assignments within the given timeframe?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

1

2

1

1

2

4

1

4

4

1

4

4

1

2

1

2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

5. How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a

method to solve bigger, academic assignments within the given timeframe?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 23: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

23

4.5.5: 9th semester

3

2

1

1

2

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

5. How do you rate the teamwork and PBL as a

method to solve bigger, academic assignments within the given timeframe?

Sum af 1 Very good

Sum af 2 Good

Sum af 3 Average

Sum af 4 Poor

Sum af 5 Very poor

Page 24: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

24

5. Voluntary Traineeship

5.1 How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its learning goals?

5.2 How much have you learned about the organisational structure and the work of an organisation seen from an engineering/managerial perspective?

1

1

2

1

3

1

1

2

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

1. How do you think the content of the project as a whole has contributed to satisfy its learning goals?

Sum af 1 Meget godt

Sum af 2 Godt

Sum af 3 Middel

Sum af 4 Dårligt

Sum af 5 Meget dårligt

1

1

2

3

1

2

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

2. How much have you learned about the organisational structure and the work of an

organisation seen from an engineering/managerial perspective?

Sum af 1 Meget godt

Sum af 2 Godt

Sum af 3 Middel

Sum af 4 Dårligt

Sum af 5 Meget dårligt

Page 25: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

25

5.3 How do you rate your own effort during the project phase as a whole?

5.4 How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching has worked to help you solve new problems and tackle challenges in an external organisation?

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

3. How do you rate your own effort during the project phase as a whole?

Sum af 1 Meget godt

Sum af 2 Godt

Sum af 3 Middel

Sum af 4 Dårligt

Sum af 5 Meget dårligt

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

3

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EPSH

MCE

OES

PECT

PED

TEPE

WPS

4. How well do you think the PBL-oriented teaching has worked to help you solve new problems and

tackle challenges in an external organisation?

Sum af 1 Meget godt

Sum af 2 Godt

Sum af 3 Middel

Sum af 4 Dårligt

Sum af 5 Meget dårligt

Page 26: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

26

6. Study Environment

6.1 The premises are suitable for teaching (equipment, indoor climate, interior design, etc.)

6.1.1: Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester

6.1.2: Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester

2

26

5

4

6

3

9

2

1

2

47

3

7

8

8

1

11

1

7

1

1

1

2

5

1

3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EE

Energi, Aalborg

EPSH

MCE

ME

PED

TE

TEPE

WPS

1.1 The premises are suitable for teaching (equipment, indoor climate, interior design, etc.)

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

4

1

3

2

3

5

1

2

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

DS

Elektronik og datateknik

Energi, Esbjerg

OES

PECT

1.1 The premises are suitable for teaching (equipment, indoor climate, interior design, etc.)

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

Page 27: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

27

6.2 Student workspaces are available to support the academic environment of my degree programme and campus in general

6.2.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester

6.2.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester

2

37

5

3

7

1

7

3

1

2

34

2

8

6

7

4

9

7

1

1

2

2

1

2

3

1

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EE

Energi, Aalborg

EPSH

MCE

ME

PED

TE

TEPE

WPS

1.2 Student workspaces are available to support the academic environment of my degree programme and

campus in general

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

2

1

1

2

3

3

3

3

2

1

2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

DS

Elektronik og datateknik

Energi, Esbjerg

OES

PECT

1.2 Student workspaces are available to support the academic environment of my degree programme and

campus in general

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

Page 28: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

28

6.3 The university offers good social facilities and spaces for taking breaks and socialising with fellow students

6.3.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester

6.3.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester

1

22

3

2

4

3

7

1

1

3

36

2

5

8

4

2

4

20

2

3

2

3

2

7

5

1

1

1

1

1

3

1

3

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EE

Energi, Aalborg

EPSH

MCE

ME

PED

TE

TEPE

WPS

1.3 Der er gode faciliteter til pauser og socialt samvær med andre studerende

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

3

2

2

2

3

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

DS

Elektronik og datateknik

Energi, Esbjerg

OES

PECT

1.3 Der er gode faciliteter til pauser og socialt samvær med andre studerende

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

Page 29: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

29

6.4 I feel comfortable in my chosen degree programme

6.4.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester

6.4.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester

43

4

4

4

8

8

5

3

33

4

6

9

3

4

10

2

7

1

1

1

1

3

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EE

Energi, Aalborg

EPSH

MCE

ME

PED

TE

TEPE

WPS

2.1 I feel comfortable in my chosen degree programme

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

2

1

3

2

3

2

1

3

3

1

1

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

DS

Elektronik og datateknik

Energi, Esbjerg

OES

PECT

2.1 I feel comfortable in my chosen degree programme

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

Page 30: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

30

6.5 I feel that there is a great sense of community in my degree programme

6.5.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester

6.5.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester

31

3

2

2

3

4

4

2

41

2

6

10

4

6

7

1

1

13

2

1

4

1

2

1

1

2

1

3

1

3

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EE

Energi, Aalborg

EPSH

MCE

ME

PED

TE

TEPE

WPS

2.2 I feel that there is a great sense of community in my degree programme

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

2

2

1

1

2

2

4

1

2

1

2

2

1

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

DS

Elektronik og datateknik

Energi, Esbjerg

OES

PECT

2.2 I feel that there is a great sense of community in my degree programme

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

Page 31: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

31

6.6 I feel that there is a great academic community in my degree programme

6.6.1 Campus Aalborg 1st-9th semester

6.6.2 Campus Esbjerg 1st-9th semester

27

3

3

5

8

7

5

1

3

51

2

5

8

3

3

9

1

1

7

2

3

1

2

2

11

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

EE

Energi, Aalborg

EPSH

MCE

ME

PED

TE

TEPE

WPS

2.3 I feel that there is a great academic community in my degree programme

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

1

1

2

1

3

2

1

1

1

3

3

1

1

2

1

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

AIE

DS

Elektronik og datateknik

Energi, Esbjerg

OES

PECT

2.3 I feel that there is a great academic community in my degree programme

Sum af 5 Completely agree

Sum af 4 Agree

Sum af 3 Neither agree nor disagree

Sum af 2 Disagree

Sum af 1 Completely disagree

Page 32: SEMESTER EVALUATION...Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology 2 Table of contents 1. Introduction .....4 1.1 Contents of the1.2 Follow-up on the 2. Response

Semester evaluation autumn 2019 Department of Energy Technology

32

Abbreviations

• AIE: Applied Industrial Electronics

• DS: Dynamic Systems

• ED: Electronics and Computer Engineering

• EE: Electrical Energy

• EN: Energy

• EPSH: Electric Power Systems and High Voltage Engineering

• HYTEC: Fuel Cells and Hydrogen Technology

• IRS: Intelligent Reliable Systems

• MCE: Mechatronic Control Engineering

• ME: Mechatronics

• OES: Offshore Energy Systems

• PECT: Proces Engineering and Combustion Technology

• PED: Power Electronics and Drives

• TE: Thermal Energy

• TEPE: Thermal Energy and Process Engineering

• WPS: Wind Power Systems