Self-Esteem And Emotional Intelligence Among Students In A ...
Transcript of Self-Esteem And Emotional Intelligence Among Students In A ...
Self-Esteem And Emotional Intelligence Among
Students In A Public Higher Learning Institution In Malaysia
Farhana Nabila Fakaruddin1, Ida Hartina Ahmed Tharbe
2
1,2 Department of Educational Psychology and Counselling, Faculty of Education, University of Malaya, Malaysia.
*E-mail: [email protected]
Abstract
This study was conducted to identify the relationship between self-esteem and emotional
intelligence among students in a public higher learning institution in Kuala Lumpur. The
respondents were 100 college students randomly selected from six faculties in the university.
The instruments used for the study were Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) and Self Rated
Malaysian Emotional Intelligence Scale (SRMEIS). The findings show that there were
significant relationship between self-esteem and emotional intelligence among university
students. Additionally, the data showed that self-esteem among university students in this study
was at medium level while the level of emotional intelligence was high. The results can be used
as reference by students, counselors, lecturers, university management, and for further research
purpose.
Keywords: self-esteem; emotional intelligence; public higher learning institution
1. Introduction
In the effort to build a prosperous nation, the
development of human capital and quality human resources cannot be overlooked and are closely
intertwined. University graduates are among those
who play the key role in leading the nation's
leadership in the future. In fact, the credibility of university graduates depends on the extent of their
positive self-development and mastery of soft skills
in dealing with future challenges and problems.
During their college life, positive self-esteem and
good emotional intelligence will help university
students in their adaptation. In long run, they will also assist college students in coping with
challenges in the real world. The Malaysia Youth
Index (2015) indicates that self-esteem and emotional intelligence are among the important
domains and indicators of significant self-
development to produce a generation of eminent personalities. These two aspects also help the nation
to produce mentally, physically and emotionally
healthy youths who are capable of facing future
challenges.
According to Sulaiman (2013), in this 21st century,
there has been a social change, in which total
success is not only measured through intellectual
intelligence but also involves aspects of emotional intelligence. Students are often faced with various
challenges, either academically or individually, that
require self-esteem to deal with the problems that occur. Recent studies have also shown that positive
self-esteem and good emotional intelligence among
students have positive impact on the life of
individuals. Rosenberg (in Yahaya & Ahmad, 2006) stated that individuals with high self-esteem would
respect and consider themselves as useful
individuals. On the other hand, individuals with low self-esteem would not accept themselves well
as they consider themselves to be useless and
inadequate. According to McLeod (2008), based on Erik Erikson's approach, individual appreciation and
uniqueness is an identity-building process. In
addition, perfect personality development depends
on the individual's freedom of choice. Regarding
Universitas Indonesia International Psychology Symposium for Undergraduate Research (UIPSUR 2017)
Copyright © 2018, the Authors. Published by Atlantis Press. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 139
243
that, self-esteem also means self-assessment,
consciousness, what the individual decides about self and how a person takes into account the
decisions of others about himself (Muntoyo, 2007).
In terms of emotional intelligence, Mayer, Caruso and Salovey (1999) refer emotional intelligence to
„the ability to recognize the meanings of emotions
and their relationships, and to reason and solve on the basis of them. Emotional intelligence is involved
in the capacity to perceive emotions, assimilate
emotion-related feelings, understand the information of those emotions, and manage them'
(pp. 267). The abilities of emotional intelligence are
essential for the development of positive personality
and well-being of individuals. Mayer and Salovey (1997) explain that emotional intelligence is divided
into four main processes. The four key processes in
the model of emotional intelligence are identifying emotions, using emotions to facilitate the process of
thinking, understanding emotions, and managing
emotions. According to Buckley and Saarni (in
Ciarrochi, Forgas & Mayer, 2006), a person with developed emotional intelligence would be able to
mobilize resources to learn new information,
acquire new insights and develop his or her talents to full potentials.
Despite the findings on the importance of self-esteem and emotional intelligence, there is still a
lack of studies about self-esteem and emotional
intelligence among university students in Malaysia.
In fact, many studies have been conducted only to examine the relationship between self-esteem and
academic excellence. Some studies on emotional
intelligence in Malaysia were - conducted among workers. Therefore, -this study aims to investigate
the relationship between self-esteem and emotional
intelligence among college students in Malaysia. In addition, this study would also examine the levels of
self-esteem and emotional intelligence in Malaysian
college students and the comparison of self-esteem
and emotional intelligence based on gender.
2. Literature Review
Many researches has been conducted worldwide to
assess the relevance of self-esteem and emotional intelligence towards the development of individuals.
However, different results had been found. Kong,
Zhao, and You (2012) studied on the role of self-esteem and social support for emotional intelligence
and satisfaction of life among university students in
China. The results showed self-esteem and social
support mediated emotional intelligence and life
satisfaction among students. They also found that
male students tend to get higher life satisfaction than female students if they have high social
support. Overall, their findings prove that self-
esteem and emotional intelligence interrelates and
contributes to student's satisfaction of life. Bibi and Saqlain (2016) study focused on emotional
intelligence and self-esteem among university
students in Pakistan. The result showed that there was a significant relationship between self-esteem
and emotional intelligence. Their finding also
showed that the level of emotional intelligence among female students was higher than male
students.
On the other hand, study by Rahimi (2016) on the relationship among emotional intelligence, self-
esteem, gender, and academic success in Iranian
students had shown different result. Their study verified that there was no significant relationship
between academic achievement with self-esteem
and emotional intelligence among university
students. Nevertheless, the level of self-esteem of female students was found to be higher than male
students. In the discussion of this study, researcher
also point out that psychological factors such as emotional intelligence and self-esteem cannot be a
determining factor in solving the impact on
academic achievement of students.
Focus on the effect of self-esteem, a study
conducted by Samin (2016) tried to assess the
relationship between self-esteem and depression among Bandar Penawar Community College
students. Their study results supported that there
was a significant negative relationship between self-esteem and depression among college students.
Hence, this study proves that the high degree of
self-esteem can help students achieve higher academic excellence. This study also proved that
high level of self-esteem reduces the level of stress
that may lead to depression among students.
Cazan and Nastasa (2015) conducted a study on
emotional intelligence. They tried to verify whether
emotional intelligence was associated with good adaptation and academic achievement among
students. The results showed that there was a
significant correlation between emotional
intelligence with better adaptability and academic achievement in university. The findings also
showed that the lack of satisfaction in the university
led to an increase in the drop-out rate of students. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that high
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 139
244
emotional intelligence can help college students in
their adjustment in university.
3. Methods
Sample. This study involved students in a public
university in Kuala Lumpur who are randomly selected from six faculties. Total of 100 students
participated in the study, consisting of 52 female
and 48 males.
Research Design. Quantitative survey method was used to gather the data needed for this study. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analysis of t-test and correlation were conducted in particular to answer the research question, using SPSS Version 23.
Based on those backgrounds, this study was guided
by the research question, “Is there a significant
relationship between self-esteem and EI in the undergraduates of a public university?”. To provide
a more comprehensive understanding of the study
variables, this research also intended to answer these questions:
a) What is the level of self-esteem of undergraduate
students in a public university?
b) What is the level of EI among undergraduates of a public university?
c) Is there a significant difference in the level of
self-esteem between the male and female undergraduates of a public university?
Instrument and Measurement. Two instruments
were used for the purpose of this study. Self-esteem
was measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem
Scale (RSES) by Morris Rosenberg (1965) which was previously translated into Malay language by
Asmin (2010). This scale was proven to have good
internal consistency (α = 0.80). The RSES contains 10 items with 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 =
strongly agree to 4=strongly disagree for the
positive items and vice versa for the negative items. Among the items, there are seven positive items and
three negative items. The scores are interpreted as
high (scores between 25 to 30), medium (scores
between 15-25) and low (scores below 15).
Emotional intelligence was measured using the Self
Rated Malaysian Emotional Intelligence scale/ SRMEIS (Ida & Ng, 2017). The 39-items inventory
measures the four domains of emotional intelligence
based on Mayer and Salovey‟s (1997) emotional
intelligence framework. The four domains are
Emotional Perception and Expression (EPE),
Emotional Facilitation of Thinking (EFT), Emotional Understanding (EU) and Emotional
Management (EM). For the purpose of this study,
only the overall scores are taken into consideration
on the basis of interpretation regardless of the scores of the four domains. The Cronbach‟s alpha for
SRMEIS extracted during the pilot study of this
research indicated a high internal consistency (α = 0.92). In this scale, participants are required to
choose a response according to the 5-point Likert
scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). The overall scores below 65 points indicate low EI,
between 65-130 points indicate medium EI, while
scores above 130 indicate high EI.
Procedure. Both measurement scales were
compiled as a questionnaire. The questionnaires
were manually distributed and collected from participants at their respective faculties.
4. Results
Based on the descriptive data, the majority of
participants (60.0%) aged from 19 to 21 years old.
The respondents consisted of 60% (N=60) Malay students, 6 (6%) Chinese students and 7 (7%)
students from other ethnics backgrounds. By the
faculty, participants of this study came from six different faculties, namely Faculty of Education
(35%), Engineering (20%), Economics (12%),
Medicine and Science (13%) and Law (7%).
Participants’ Level of Self-Esteem and
Emotional Intelligence
Table 1 shows the level of self-esteem and
emotional intelligence of participants in this study.
As can be seen, this study found that students have medium level of self-esteem (M = 18.3). Along with
that, their level of emotional intelligence (EI) can be
categorized as high (M = 143.81). With reference to
the four domains of EI, participants of this study also showed a high level of emotional perception
and expression (M = 40.82), emotional facilitation
of thinking (M = 51.75), and emotional management respectively (M = 39.96). Meanwhile,
their level of emotional understanding was in
medium level (M = 11.28) These scores show that
the students have high ability to perceive and express emotion accurately, use emotions to
facilitate thought and manage their emotions.
However, they have averaged in terms of the ability to understand emotions.
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 139
245
Table 1
Level of self-esteem and emotional intelligence
Domains Mean Level
Self Esteem
18.3 Medium
Overall EI 143.81 High
EPE 40.82 High
EFT 51.75 High
EU - 11.28 Medium
EM 39.96 High Note: EPE = Emotional Perception and Expression; EFT = Emotional Facilitation of Thinking; EU = Emotional Understanding; EM = Emotional Management
Correlation between Self-Esteem and Emotional
Intelligence
Based on the result of Pearson Correlation Analysis
between self-esteem and emotional intelligence, there was a significant positive relationship between
self-esteem and emotional intelligence among
university students (r = 0.522 ; p < .05).
Comparison of Self-Esteem and Emotional
Intelligence between Gender
Table 1.2 illustrates the results of independent
sample t-test analysis to compare the level of self-
esteem and emotional intelligence between male and female students. It reveals significant difference
(t (100) = 2.67, p < .05) between the self-esteem
score of male students (M =17.31, SD = 3.78) and
female students (M =19.21, SD =3.33), with female students having higher level of self-esteem. These
results also show significant difference (t (100) =
2.38, p < .05) on the overall EI scores between male (M= 140.32, SD 12.63) and female (M = 147.03, SD
= 15.41) students. This finding indicates that female
students have higher emotional intelligence.
Table 1.2
t-test Results of Self-esteem and Emotional Intelligence
based on Gender Variable Self-Esteem EI
Male M 17.31 140.31 SD 3.78 12.63 Female M 19.21 147.03
SD 3.33 15.41 t 2.67 2.376 p 0.009* 0.019*
*p<.05
5. Discussion & Conclusion
This study has verified the hypothesis about the relationship between self-esteem and emotional
intelligence (EI). This result is consistent with the
finding of Schutte et al (2002), which found that
higher emotional intelligence enables individuals to
maintain higher level of self-esteem, thus having better perception of self-worth or value. Salovey et
al (2002) found that mood clarity and mood repair
are positively correlated with self-esteem. Therefore
the understanding of the relationship between self-esteem and emotional intelligence is very important
in the effort to assist university students in coping
with challenges of university life and beyond. The significant relationship found between self-esteem
and emotional intelligence among students provides
a useful basis for further research and interventions. Counselors may provide training as interventions to
improve self-esteem to enhance EI or vice versa in
line with this objective. Further research are also
recommended to determine the direction of the relationship whether self-esteem influence
emotional intelligence or the other way round.
Previous studies have found inconsistency in their
finding of self-esteem level among university
students. However, this study‟s findings show that
the level of self-esteem among Malaysian university students is at a medium level. This result supports
the finding of Othman (2006) which found that the
level of self-esteem among university students was at moderate level. This study also revealed
consistent result with the study of Kosnin et al.
(2003) that also reported that the level of self-esteem of university students was at moderate level.
Self-esteem among students depends on how they
judge themselves in various aspects of life. Level of
self-esteem can be influenced by their ability to cope and adapt to challenges in university life.
Problem they face in adapting to the university
environment and lifestyle will indirectly affect the level of their self-confidence and self-esteem
(Kosnin 2013). It could explain why the self-esteem
level of students in this study was medium instead of high.
Overall, the students in this study have high level of
emotional intelligence (EI). This finding is similar to the findings by Che Ani (2013) and Cazan and
Nastasa (2015). This implies that they are good at
perceiving and expressing their emotion, know how to use their emotions in making rational decisions
and have the ability to manage their emotions well.
Although they score moderately in terms of
emotional understanding, all the domains of EI can be enhanced and further developed through proper
training. Chan (2005) believes that individuals
might benefit from special guidance and counseling services, training and support to enhance their EI.
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 139
246
Being emotionally intelligence can be a great
advantage to these students in their future development, personally and professionally.
Personally, individuals with high EI have been said
to be able to intuitively understand what others
need, aware of their own strength and weaknesses, able to remain „unruffled' by stress and tend to
connect better with other individuals (Stein & Book,
2000). Professionally, many researchers argued that there is a direct link between EI and job
performance (Kluemper, DeGroot and Choi; 2013)
and plays an important role in leadership behaviors (Boyatzis, Good & Massa; 2012).
The findings show that the level of self-esteem
among male students is lower than female students. This finding is consistent with the study conducted
by Rahimi (2016), who found that the level of self-
esteem among female students was higher than male students. This is probably because men are a
minority group in the university setting, compared
to women. Thus, this situation could impose a sense
of challenge to them. Therefore, male students may need to be more acquainted with the situation in
order to be more proactive and improve their
competitiveness. Kong et al. (2012) suggested that the level of self-esteem among male students can be
enhanced through positive social support from
others. Similar condition found for emotional intelligence.
Female students were measured to have higher level
of emotional intelligence compare to their male
counterparts. This finding supported the earlier studies by Bibi, Saqlain & Musawwar (2016) and
Walsh and Joyce (2011). Several studies argued that
women tend to be more emotionally intelligent because they received education biased towards
emotions while men are taught to minimize certain
emotions related to sadness, guilt, vulnerability and fear (Brody & Hall, 1999; Sánchez, Fernández-
Berrocal, Montañés, & Latorre, 2008). Studies also
conclude that women have a greater emotional
knowledge and tend to they express their emotions more fluently and more frequently and can easily
adapt themselves socially compared to men. (Brody
& Hall, 2000; Ciarrochi, Hynes, & Crittenden, 2005; Hall & Mast, 2008) Acceptance and social
support received by female students at the
university also affects the high level of emotional
intelligence.
References
Bibi S, Saqlain S, Mussawar B (2016) Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Self Esteem among
Pakistani University Students. Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy 6:279. doi:10.4172/2161-0487.1000279
Boyatzis, R.E., Good, D. & Massa, R. 2012. Emotional, social,
and cognitive intelligence and personality as predictors of sales leadership performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 19: 191-201.
Brody, L. R., & Hall, J. A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 338-349). New York: Guilford.
Buckley, M., & Saarni, C. 2006. Skills of emotional competence: Developmental implications. In J.
Ciarrochi, J. P. Forgas & J. D. Mayer (Eds.), Emotional Intelligence in Everyday Life (2nd ed., pp. 51-76). New York: Psychology Press.
Cazan, A. & Nastasa, L. (2015). Emotional Intelligence, Satisfaction with Life and Burnout among University Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 1574 -1578.
Che Ani, R. (2013). Kecerdasan Emosi dalam Kalangan Pelajar
Diploma Pendidikan Lepasan Ijazah (DPLI). Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia - UTHM Institutional Repository. Eprints.uthm.edu.my.
Ciarrochi, J. V., Hynes, K., & Crittenden, N. (2005). Can men do better if they try harder? Sex and motivational effects on emotional awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 19, 133-141.
Hall, J. A., & Mast, M. S. (2008). Are women always more
interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of goals and content domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 144-155.
Ida Hartina Ahmed Tharbe & Ng, K.M. (2017). Development of Self Rated Malaysian Emotional Intelligence Scale. MOJC: Malaysian Online Journal of Counseling, 4(1), 24-36.
Kluemper, D.H., DeGroot, T. & Choi, S. 2013. Emotion
management ability predicting task performance, citizenship, and deviance. Journal of Management. 39(4): 878-905
Kong, F., Zhao, J., & You, X. (2012). Emotional intelligence and life satisfaction in Chinese University Students: The Mediating Role of Self-Esteem and Social Support. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(8), 1039-1043.
Kosnin, M., Azlina. S., Rajab, S., Wan Zakaria, A., Wan Zarina. (2003). Pengaruh Amalan Keibubapaan Terhadap Penghargaan Kendiri Pelajar Peringkat Awal Dewasa. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 17 (2). 1-11. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Mayer, J. D., & Salovey, P. (1997). What Is Emotional Intelligence? In P. Salovey & D.J. Slyuter (Eds.), Emotional Development and Emotional Intelligence: Educational Implications (pp.3-34). New York:
Harper Collins. Mayer, J.D., Caruso, D.R., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional
Intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267-298
McLeod, S. (2008). Erikson's Psychosocial Stages of Development. Simply Psychology.
Muntoyo. (2007). Sokongan Keluarga dan Penghargaan Kendiri di Kalangan Murid Cemerlang di Sebuah Sekolah
Menengah di Kuala Lumpur. Perpustakaan Universiti Malaya.
Othman, N. (2006). Hubungan Antara Harga Diri dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar Pelajar Tahun Lima Kursus Sains dan Matematik. Tesis yang tidak
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 139
247
diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Rahimi, M. (2016). The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence, Self-Esteem, Gender and Educational
Success. Management Science Letters, 481-486. Salovey, P., Mayer J.D., & Caruso, D. 2002. The positive
psychology of emotional intelligence. In Snyder, C.R & Lopez, S.J. (Eds). Handbook of positive psychology, pp 159-171. New York: Oxford University Press Inc
Samin, Z. (2016). Hubungan Penghargaan Kendiri dan Kemurungan dalam Kalangan Pelajar Kolej Komuniti
Bandar Penawar Johor. Kolej Komuniti Bandar Penawar Johor.
Sánchez Núñez, M. T., Fernández-Berrocal, P., Montañés, J., & Latorre, J. M. (2008). Does emotional intelligence depend on gender? The socialization of emotional competencies in men and women and its implications.
Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 15, 455-474.
Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Simunek, M., Mckenley, J. & Hollander, S. 2002. Characteristic emotional
intelligence and emotional well-being. Cognition and Emotion 16(6): 769-785.
Sulaiman, H. (2013). Hubungan Antara Kecerdasan Emosi dengan Gaya Asuhan Ibu Bapa dalam Kalangan Remaja Sekolah. Tesis yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Malaya.
Walsh-Portillo & Joyce, G. (2011). The Role of Emotional Intelligence in College Students‟Success. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 491.
Yahaya, A. & Ahmad, N. (2006). Teori-Teori Konsep Kendiri. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. http://eprints.utm.my/10368/3/Norlaily_Binti_Ahmad.pdf
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 139
248