Self-advocates partners in building an inclusive society Damjan Janjušević Life in the Community...
-
Upload
reginald-cannon -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Self-advocates partners in building an inclusive society Damjan Janjušević Life in the Community...
Self-advocates partners in building an inclusive society
Damjan Janjušević
Life in the Community1. – 2. 11. 2011
THE HISTORY OF THE IDEA OF SELF ADVOCACY
1968 the roots of the movement of self advocacy in Sweden
1973 The first convention of the „mentally handicapped“ with the subject Can I have a choice
1974 People First founded in Salem (USA)
„We wanted to talk about what is happening in our lives“
„I am tired of being called retarded - we are people first“
October 1974 the first convention of People First was held
People First today - more than 800 groups and 17,000 members in 43 countries
ASA VISION, MISSION AND GOALS
Founded in Zagreb in October, 2003
Before that working in self advocacy groups
Membership in Inclusion Europe and ECCL
At the moment 35 members and 6 employees
VISION AND MISSION
A society in which persons with intellectual disabilities are equal citizens
Assemble persons with intellectual disabilities in a democratic and open organization
Advocate for the equality of PID.
GOALS
PID have control and make decisions
All PID live in the community and have support for meaningful community living
PID included in decision-making at a local and national level
ASA the leader
THE CONCEPT OF SELF ADVOCACY
ASA an independent organization of PID
ASA does not deal with rehabilitation or teaching of PID
PID have the right to assemble and associate just like all other citizens
THE CONCEPT OF SELF ADVOCACY
Self advocates have the right to get information and support in advocating their interests
Self advocation is open to everyone
ASA is run by self advocates and belongs to self advocates
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID
Citizens and nationals - basic status of every person
Establishing the diagnosis of ID
Separation - special kindergarten classes, special schools, special workplaces, special places to live
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - INSTITUTIONS
Threatened freedom of movement
Freedom to communicate
Privacy
Having relationships or making a family
Inability to choose food, clothes, shoes
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - EDUCATION
Impossibility to choose schools
Separation from children without disabilities
Poor quality and level of knowledge
Impossibility to choose occupation or profession, lifelong learning, ect
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - EMPLOYMENT
Impossibility of employment in open labour market
Working in sheltered workshops
Working in institutions
Unpaid or poorly paid work
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID
Eliminating perspectiveImpossibility of planning
Impossibility to improve one's position in an institution, but also in the community
The message: obedience is better than personal advocating
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID
The need for radical changes in the society's treatment of PID
Necessary to reconsider their status and position in the society
Existence of two parallel worlds or societies
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - CARE
Care based on the principle of compassion or charity, not protection of human rights
Question: can PID ask for more and better than institution, special schools or sheltered workshops?
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - PROTECTION
Protection based on the assumption of complete incompetence
Primacy of the principle of ensuring complete protection above the principle of respecting human rights
Deprivation of legal capacity
Impossibility to influence one's own life
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - NEW VIEWS
The concept of human rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
The duty to develop and protect human rights
Restricting human rights must not be arbitrary
HUMAN RIGHTS OF PID - NEW VIEWS
Universality
Expansion
Possibility of protection from the court- enforceability
THE CONNECTION BETWEEN SELF ADVOCACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Self advocacy means:
Human rights protection
Possibility to associate, of free speech, to be informed and exchange ideas
Possibility for joint action
QUESTIONS
How to ensure the involvement of PID in the decision making processes?
How to ensure a balance of risk between need for legal protection and right to decide about their life?
How to build a society in which PID will have a perspective outside the social care system?
Thank you for your attention.
Damjan Janjušević[email protected]. + 385 www.trass.cz
www.facebook.com/trass.cz