Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) · cold weather gear MOPP IV or cold weather gear MOPP IV or cold...
Transcript of Selected Acquisition Report (SAR) · cold weather gear MOPP IV or cold weather gear MOPP IV or cold...
Selected Acquisition Report (SAR)
RCS: DD-A&T(Q&A)823-386
Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR)As of December 31, 2012
Defense Acquisition Management Information Retrieval
(DAMIR)
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 2
Table of Contents
Program Information 3Responsible Office 3References 3Mission and Description 4Executive Summary 5Threshold Breaches 6Schedule 7Performance 9Track To Budget 18Cost and Funding 19Low Rate Initial Production 29Foreign Military Sales 30Nuclear Cost 30Unit Cost 31Cost Variance 34Contracts 37Deliveries and Expenditures 39Operating and Support Cost 40
Program Information
Responsible Office
References
Program Name Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR)
DoD Component Navy
Responsible OfficeMr. R. E. Lee Bond 2200 Lester Ave Quantico, VA 22134
Phone Fax DSN Phone DSN Fax
703-432-4982 703-784-0307 378-4982 278-0307
[email protected] Date Assigned July 7, 2009
SAR Baseline (Development Estimate)Navy Acquisition Executive (NAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated May 22, 2012 Approved APBNavy Acquisition Executive (NAE) Approved Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) dated May 22, 2012
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 3
Mission and Description The Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) is a single material solution for the mobile Multi-Role Radar System (MRRS) and Ground Weapons Locating Radar (GWLR) requirements. It is a three-dimensional (3D), short/medium range multi-role radar designed to detect unmanned aerial systems, cruise missiles, air breathing targets, rockets, artillery, and mortars. G/ATOR satisfies the warfighter's expeditionary needs across the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) spectrum replacing five legacy radar systems with a single solution. The Air Defense/ Surveillance Radar (AD/SR) G/ATOR Block 1 (GB1) provides capabilities in the Short Range Air Defense (SHORAD) and Air Surveillance mission areas; Ground Weapons Locating Radar (GWLR) G/ATOR Block 2 (GB2) will address Counter-fire Targeting Missions; and Expeditionary Airport Surveillance Radar (EASR) G/ATOR Block 4 (GB4) will address Air Traffic Control (ATC) missions. G/ATOR provides real-time radar measurement data to the Tactical Air Operations Module (TAOM), Common Aviation Command and Control System (CAC2S), Composite Tracking Network (CTN), and Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS). G/ATOR Block 3 (GB3) is not currently defined or resourced. Once GB3 capabilities are defined resourcing will be included in future budget builds.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 4
Executive Summary The Assistant Secretary of the Navy, Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN (RD&A)) approved the Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) Justification and Approval (J&A) on July 25, 2012. Admiral Winnifeld, Vice Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff (VCJCS) signed the Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) 188-12 of December 3, 2012 endorsing the G/ATOR Block 1 (GB1) Capability Production Document (CPD). Developmental Testing (DT) for Radar Performance and Command and Control (C2) Integration for AD/SR (GB1) commenced in July 2012 with good performance demonstrated thus far. The latest Program Manager estimate reflects Milestone C which is scheduled for December 2013. The Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase of the program is fully resourced in the 2014 President's Budget (PB) which also supports procurement of Air Defense/Surveillance Radar (AD/SR) G/ATOR Block 1 (GB1) and Ground Weapons Locating Radar (GWLR) G/ATOR Block 2 (GB2). The Navy is pursuing the resourcing of Expeditionary Air Surveillance Radar (EASR) G/ATOR Block 4 (GB4) as part of a future Budget Build. The Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (USD (AT&L)) designated the G/ATOR program as an Acquisition Category (ACAT) IC Major Defense Acquisition Program (MDAP) with the Department of the Navy (DoN) as the lead component on October 28, 2011. ASN (RD&A) approved the Acquisition Strategy on March 12, 2012 to update the restructured program. The Naval Center for Cost Analysis (NCCA) established a Service Cost Position (SCP) to support the development of the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB) and the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy Cost and Economics (DASN (C&E)) conducted the Cost Review Board (CRB) on April 9, 2012 resulting in a signed SCP Memo. ASN (RD&A) approved the APB on May 22, 2012.
There are no significant software-related issues with this program at this time.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 5
Threshold Breaches
APB Breaches Schedule Performance Cost RDT&E
Procurement MILCON Acq O&M
O&S CostUnit Cost PAUC
APUC Nunn-McCurdy Breaches
Current UCR Baseline PAUC NoneAPUC None
Original UCR Baseline PAUC NoneAPUC None
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 6
Schedule
Milestones SAR Baseline Dev Est
Current APB Development
Objective/Threshold
Current Estimate
AD/SR (GB1) Milestone B AUG 2005 AUG 2005 AUG 2005 AUG 2005Critical Design Review MAR 2009 MAR 2009 MAR 2009 MAR 2009Milestone C JUL 2013 JUL 2013 JAN 2014 DEC 2013 (Ch-1)
IOT&E MAR 2016 MAR 2016 SEP 2016 MAY 2016 (Ch-1)
Full Rate Production Decision JUL 2016 JUL 2016 JAN 2017 SEP 2016 (Ch-1)
IOC AUG 2016 AUG 2016 FEB 2017 SEP 2016 (Ch-1)
GWLR (GB2) FOT&E MAR 2017 MAR 2017 SEP 2017 MAY 2017 (Ch-1)
IOC AUG 2017 AUG 2017 FEB 2018 SEP 2017 (Ch-1)
EASR (GB4) FOT&E MAR 2018 MAR 2018 SEP 2018 MAY 2018 (Ch-1)
IOC JUL 2018 JUL 2018 JAN 2019 SEP 2018 (Ch-1)
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 7
Acronyms And Abbreviations AD/SR - Air Defense/Surveillance Radar EASR - Expeditionary Airport Surveillance Radar FOT&E - Follow-on Test and Evaluation GB1 - Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 1 GB2 - Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 2 GB4 - Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 4 GWLR - Ground Weapons Locating Radar IOC - Initial Operational Capability IOT&E - Initial Operational Test and Evaluation
Change Explanations (Ch-1) Delays in Developmental Test caused the program schedule to misalign with bi-annual testing opportunities forcing Operational Assessment (OA) to be delayed until the fall of 2013. These delays have impacted Milestone C and all subsequent major program events. Changes as follows: AD/SR (GB1) - Milestone C from July 2013 to December 2013; Initial Operational Test and Evaluation from March 2016 to May 2016; Full Rate Production Decision from July 2016 to September 2016; Initial Operational Capability (IOC) from August 2016 to September 2016. GWLR (GB2) – Follow-on Test and Evaluation (FOT&E) from March 2017 to May 2017; IOC from August 2017 to September 2017. EASR (GB4) – FOT&E from March 2018 to May 2018; IOC from July 2018 to September 2018.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 8
Performance
Characteristics SAR Baseline Dev Est
Current APB Development
Objective/Threshold
Demonstrated Performance
Current Estimate
AD/SR (GB1) Information Exchange Requirement
Satisfy 100% of Information Exchange Require-ments
Satisfy 100% of Information Exchange Require-ments
Satisfy 100% of Critical Information Exchange Require-ments
TBD Satisfy 100% of Critical Information Exchange Require- ments
DoD Integrated Architecture
Conform to applicable JROC/JCS approved/ validated DoD Integrated Architecturesand applicable approved/ validated behavior models
Conform to applicable JROC/JCS approved/ validated DoD Integrated Architecturesand applicable approved/ validated behavior models (Objective= Threshold)
Conform to applicable JROC/JCS approved/ validated DoD Integrated Architecturesand applicable approved/ validated behavior models
TBD Conform to applicable JROC/JCS approved/ validated DoD Integrated Architecturesand applicable approved/ validated behavior models
C2 Interoperability Meet Global Information Grid requirementsto support interoperabil-ity with current C2 and Sensor Network information systems/ sources and those developed in the future for US National, Allied, Joint and Multinational
Meet Global Information Grid requirementsto support interoperabil-ity with current C2 and Sensor Network information systems/ sources and those developed in the future for US National, Allied, Joint and Multinational
Meet Global Information Grid requirementsto support interoperabil-ity with current C2 and Sensor Network information systems/ sources and those developed in the future for US National, Allied, Joint and Multinational
TBD Meet Global Information Grid requirementsto support interloperabil-ity with current C2 and Sensor Network information systems/ sources and those developed in the future for US National, Allied, Joint and Multinational
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 9
(Coalition) Forces and Agencies
(Coalition) Forces and Agencies (Objective= Threshold)
(Coalition) Forces and Agencies
(Coalition) Forces and Agencies
Probability of Firm Track for a Swerling Case 1 target with a Radar Cross Section (RCS) of Type 0, Type 1, and Type 2 (%)
0.95 0.95 0.90 TBD 0.90
Range Accuracy (ft) 200 200 300 TBD 300Height Accuracy 500 ft at 40
nm500 ft at 40 nm
1000 ft at 40 nm
TBD 800 ft at 40 nm
Type 0 FTR (nm) 160 160 0.5 – 120 TBD 135Type 1 FTR (nm) 100 100 0.5 – 70 TBD 75Type 2 FTR (nm) 70 70 0.5 – 40 TBD 40Combat ID Modes 1, 2,
3/C, 4Modes 1, 2, 3/C, 4 (Objective= Threshold)
Modes 1, 2, 3/C, 4
TBD Modes 1, 2, 3/C, 4
Setup Time Reconfigur-able from mobility mode to operational mode in no more than 30 minutes by no more than 4 Marines dressed in standard camouflage uniform
Reconfigur-able from mobility mode to operational mode in no more than 30 minutes by no more than 4 Marines dressed in standard camouflage uniform
Reconfigur-able from mobility mode to operational mode in no more than 60 minutes by no more than 4 Marines dressed in standard camouflage uniform
TBD Reconfigur-able from mobility mode to operational mode in no more than 30 minutes by no more than 4 Marines dressed in standard camouflage uniform.
Teardown Time Reconfigur-able from operational mode to mobility mode in no more than 45 minutes by no more than four Marines dressed in
Reconfigur-able from operational mode to mobility mode in no more than 45 minutes by no more than four Marines dressed in
Reconfigur-able from operational mode to mobility mode in no more than 60 minutes by no more than four Marines dressed in
TBD Reconfigur-able from operational mode to mobility mode in no more than 45 minutes by no more than four Marines dressed in
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 10
MOPP IV or cold weather gear
MOPP IV or cold weather gear
MOPP IV or cold weather gear
MOPP IV or cold weather gear.
C130 Transportable G/ATOR and all support equipment shall be internally transportableby a C-130
G/ATOR and all support equipment shall be internally transportableby a C-130 (Objective= Threshold)
G/ATOR and all support equipment shall be internally transportableby a C-130
TBD G/ATOR and all support equipment shall be internally transportableby a C-130.
Combat Identification Categorize by target class and type
Categorize by target class and type
Radar shall incorporate NCTR and NCTI technology to allow for classification of unknown and threat targets by class (cruise missile, fixed wing aircraft, helicopter, etc.)
TBD Radar shall incorporate NCTR and NCTI technology to allow for classification of unknown and threat targets by class (cruise missile, fixed wing aircraft, helicopter, etc.)
External Lift MV-22/CH-53E
Components of the G/ATOR shall be configured to accommo-date safe loading/ unloading into/from its prime mover, into/from the C-130 variant and be capable of being externally lifted by the MV-22 or CH/MH-53D/E/K helicopters.
Components of the G/ATOR shall be configured to accommo-date safe loading/ unloading into/from its prime mover, into/from the C-130 variant and be capable of being externally lifted by the MV-22 or CH/MH-53D/E/K helicopters. (Objective=
Components of the G/ATOR shall be configured to accommo-date safe loading/ unloading into/from its prime mover, into/from the C-130 variant and be capable of being externally lifted by the MV-22 or CH/MH-53D/E/K helicopters.
TBD Components of the G/ATOR shall be configured to accommo-date safe loading/ unloading into/from its prime mover, into/from the C-130 variant and be capable of being externally lifted by the MV-22 or CH/MH-53D/E/K helicopters.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 11
Threshold)Net Ready 1) DISR
mandated GIG IT standards and profiles identified in the TV-1; 2) DISR mandated GIG KIPs identified in the KIP declaration table; 3) NCOW RM Enterprise Services; 4) Information assurance requirementsincluding availability, integrity, authenticat-ion, confidential-ity and non-repudiation and issuance of an Approval to Operate by the DAA; and 5) Operationallyeffective information exchanges; and mission critical performance and information assurance attributes, data correctness, data availability, and
1) DISR mandated GIG IT standards and profiles identified in the TV-1; 2) DISR mandated GIG KIPs identified in the KIP declaration table; 3) NCOW RM Enterprise Services; 4) Information assurance requirementsincluding availability, integrity, authenticat-ion, confidential-ity and non-repudiation and issuance of an Approval to Operate by the DAA; and 5) Operationallyeffective information exchanges; and mission critical performance and information assurance attributes, data correctness, data availability, and
1) DISR mandated GIG IT standards and profiles identified in the TV-1; 2) DISR mandated GIG KIPs identified in the KIP declaration 1104 table; 3) NCOW RM Enterprise Services; 4) Information assurance requirementsincluding availability, integrity, authenticat-ion, confidentialityand non-repudiation and issuance of an IATO by the DAA; and 5) Operationallyeffective information exchanges; and mission critical performance and information assurance attributes, data correctness, data processing, specified in
TBD 1) DISR mandated GIG IT standards and profiles identified in the TV-1; 2) DISR mandated GIG KIPs identified in the KIP declaration 1104 table; 3) NCOW RM Enterprise Services; 4) Information assurance requirementsincluding availability, integrity, authenticat-ion, confidential-ity and non-repudiation and issuance of an IATO by the DAA; and 5) Operationallyeffective information exchanges; and mission critical performance and information assurance attributes, data correctness, data processing, specified in
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 12
consistent data processing, specified in the applicable joint and system integrated architecture views.
consistent data processing, specified in the applicable joint and system integrated architecture views.
the applicable joint and system integrated architecture views.
the applicable joint and system integrated architecture views.
GWLR (GB2) Detection, Tracking and Classification (all ranges in (km))
(Mortar (Light .5-30) (Medium .5-40) (Heavy .5-40)) (Artillery (Light 3-60) (Medium 3-60) (Heavy 3-60)) (Rockets (Light 6-60) (Medium 6-60) (Heavy 15-90))
(Mortar (Light .5-30) (Medium .5-40) (Heavy .5-40)) (Artillery (Light 3-60) (Medium 3-60) (Heavy 3-60)) (Rockets (Light 6-60) (Medium 6-60) (Heavy 15-90))
(Mortar (Light .75-20) (Medium .75-30) (Heavy .75-30)) (Artillery (Light 3-30) (Medium 3-40) (Heavy 3-40)) (Rockets (Light 10-40) (Medium 10-50) (Heavy 10-60))
TBD (Mortar (Light .75-20) (Medium .75-30) (Heavy .75-30)) (Artillery (Light 3-30) (Medium 3-40) (Heavy 3-40)) (Rockets (Light 10-40) (Medium 10-50) (Heavy 10-60))
Probability of location (acquisition)
Assuming no targets in track, 0.97 for at least 90% of the cases in the shot array with +/-800 mils coverage (1600 mils total) with the radar in either normal or extended range operating mode in the defined nominal environment.
Assuming no targets in track, 0.97 for at least 90% of the cases in the shot array with +/-800 mils coverage (1600 mils total) with the radar in either normal or extended range operating mode in the defined nominal environment.
Assuming no targets in track, 0.90 for at least 90% of the cases in the shot array with +/-800 mils coverage (1600 mils total) with the radar in either normal or extended range operating mode in the defined nominal environment.
TBD Assuming no targets in track, 0.90 for at least 90% of the cases in the shot array with +/-800 mils coverage (1600 mils total) with the radar in either normal or extended range operating mode in the defined nominal environment.
Hostile Weapon Location (range in
The CEP50 of weapon
The CEP50 of weapon
The CEP50 of weapon
TBD The CEP50 of weapon
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 13
(m)) location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range for at least 90% (threshold) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range for at least 90% (threshold) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range for at least 80% (objective) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range for at least 80% (objective) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
Projectile Impact (CEP50)
The CEP50 of weapon location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range (in meters) for at least 90% (threshold) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
The CEP50 of weapon location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range (in meters) for at least 90% (threshold) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
The CEP50 of weapon location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range (in meters) for at least 80% (objective) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
TBD The CEP50 of weapon location shall be less than the greater of 30m or 0.252% of range (in meters) for at least 80% (objective) of the cases in the shot array in the defined nominal environment.
Transportability C-130 drive-on, drive-off
C-130 drive-on, drive-off (Objective= Threshold)
C-130 drive-on, drive-off
TBD C-130 drive-on, drive-off.
Net Ready 100% of interfaces certified; services; policy-enforcement controls; and data correctness, availability and processing requirementsin the Joint integrated
100% of interfaces certified; services; policy-enforcement controls; and data correctness, availability and processing requirementsin the Joint integrated
100% of interfaces certified; services; policy-enforcement controls; and data correctness, availability and processing requirementsdesignated as
TBD 100 percent of interfaces certified; services; policy-enforcement controls; and data correctness, availability and processing requirementsdesignated as
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 14
architecture. architecture. enterprise-level or critical in the Joint integrated architecture.
enterprise-level or critical in the Joint integrated architecture.
EASR (GB4) FAA Radar Commissioning Certification
The EASR, when interfaced with a MATC system, shall meet FAA radar commission-ing certification requirementsin accordance with FAAO 8200.1, USSFIM.
The EASR, when interfaced with a MATC system, shall meet FAA radar commission-ing certification requirementsin accordance with FAAO 8200.1, USSFIM. (Objective= Threshold)
The EASR, when interfaced with a MATC system, shall meet FAA radar commission-ing certification requirementsin accordance with FAAO 8200.1, USSFIM.
TBD The EASR, when interfaced with a MATC system, shall meet FAA radar commis-sioning certification requirementsin accordance with FAAO 8200.1, USSFIM.
FAA Data Exchange The EASR shall provide automated exchange of surveillance and tracking data in a format compatible with NAS and ICAO standards via applicable networks.
The EASR shall provide automated exchange of surveillance and tracking data in a format compatible with NAS and ICAO standards via applicable networks. (Objective= Threshold)
The EASR shall provide automated exchange of surveillance and tracking data in a format compatible with NAS and ICAO standards via applicable networks.
TBD The EASR shall provide automated exchange of surveillance and tracking data in a format compatible with NAS and ICAO standards via applicable networks.
Combat Identification IFF Mode 5 (Level 3) capabilities IFF Mode S (Level 3) capabilities
IFF Mode 5 (Level 3) capabilities IFF Mode S (Level 3) capabilities
Radar shall be capable of transmitting and receiving IFF: Mode 1, 2, 3/A, C, 4, Mode 5
TBD Radar shall be capable of transmitting and receiving IFF: Mode 1, 2, 3/A, C, 4, Mode 5
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 15
Requirements Source: Operational Requirements Document (ORD) dated July 20, 2004
(level 2) and Mode S (level 2)
(level 2) and Mode S (level 2)
Acronyms And Abbreviations AD/SR - Air Defense/Surveillance Radar C2 - Command and Control CEP50 - Circular Error Probable 50 DAA - Designated Approving Authority DISR - DoD Information Technology Standards and Profile Registry DoD - Department of Defense EASR - Expeditionary Airport Surveillance Radar FAA - Federal Aviation Administration FAAO - Federal Aviation Administration Order ft - foot FTR - Firm Track Range GB1 - Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 1 GB2 - Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 2 GB4 - Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 4 GIG - Global Information Grid IATO - Interim Authorization to Operate ICAO - International Civil Aviation Organization IFF - Identification Friend or Foe IT - Information Technology JCS - Joint Chiefs of Staff JROC - Joint Requirements Oversight Council KIP - Key Interface Profile km - Kilometers m - meters MATC - Marine Air Traffic Control mils - milliradians MOPP - Mission Oriented Protective Posture NAS - Naval Air Station NCOW RM - Net-Centric Operations and Warfare Reference Model NCTI - Non-Cooperative Target Identification NCTR - Non-Cooperative Target Recognition nm - nautical mile RCS - Radar Cross Section TBD - To Be Determined TV - Technical Standards View US - United States USSFIM - United States Standard Flight Inspection Manual
Change Explanations None Memo
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 16
Performance Characteristic Air Defense/Surveillance Radar (AD/SR) Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 1 (GB1) - Combat Identification, was deferred based on Marine Requirements Oversight Council (MROC) Decision Memorandum (DM) 26 – 2010. Performance Characteristic Expeditionary Airport Surveillance Radar (EASR) Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar Block 4 (GB4) - Combat Identification MROC DM 26 – 2010 approved the movement of this Key Performance Parameter (KPP) to GB4.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 17
Track To Budget
RDT&E APPN 1319 BA 07 PE 0204460M (Navy)
Project C9C89 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR)
APPN 1319 BA 07 PE 0206313M (Navy)
Project C9C89 Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR)
(Sunk)
Procurement APPN 1109 BA 04 PE 0204460M (Navy) ICN 4650 Radar Systems (Shared) APPN 1109 BA 04 PE 0206313M (Navy) ICN 4650 Radar Systems (Shared) APPN 1109 BA 04 PE 0506313M (Navy) ICN 4650 Radar Systems (Shared) APPN 1109 BA 07 PE 0204460M (Navy) ICN 7000 Spares and Repair Parts (Shared) MILCON Funding line has not been established; awaiting Military Construction (MILCON) approval.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 18
Cost and Funding Cost Summary
Total Acquisition Cost and Quantity
BY2012 $M BY2012 $M TY $M
Appropriation SAR Baseline Dev Est
Current APB Development
Objective/Threshold
Current Estimate
SAR Baseline Dev Est
Current APB Development
Objective
Current Estimate
RDT&E 878.2 878.2 966.0 912.0 887.6 887.6 940.4
Procurement 2103.1 2103.1 2313.4 1291.3 2431.9 2431.9 1466.8
Flyaway 1947.0 -- -- 1188.4 2251.0 -- 1349.6
Recurring 1944.6 -- -- 1165.8 2248.5 -- 1325.5
Non Recurring 2.4 -- -- 22.6 2.5 -- 24.1
Support 156.1 -- -- 102.9 180.9 -- 117.2
Other Support 19.9 -- -- 8.8 23.1 -- 10.3
Initial Spares 136.2 -- -- 94.1 157.8 -- 106.9
MILCON 6.0 6.0 6.6 5.9 6.4 6.4 6.6
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 -- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total 2987.3 2987.3 N/A 2209.2 3325.9 3325.9 2413.8 Confidence Level for Current APB Cost 50% - The Independent Cost Estimate (ICE) to support the Ground/Air Task Oriented Radar (G/ATOR) program to establish a new APB; like all life-cycle cost estimates previously performed by the Naval Center for Cost Analysis (NCCA) is built upon a product-oriented work breakdown structure, based on historical actual cost information to the maximum extent possible, and, most importantly, based on conservative assumptions that are consistent with actual demonstrated contractor and government performance for a series of acquisition programs in which the Department has been successful. Current Estimate reflects the anticipated production efficiencies. The fifty-seven (57) systems are currently authorized in the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB); however, forty-five (45) systems are currently funded in the FY 2014 President's Budget (PB).
QuantitySAR Baseline
Dev EstCurrent APB Development Current Estimate
RDT&E 0 0 0Procurement 57 57 45Total 57 57 45
The fifty-seven (57) systems are currently authorized in the Acquisition Program Baseline (APB); however, forty-five (45) systems are currently funded in FY 2014 President's Budget (PB).
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 19
Cost and Funding Funding Summary
Appropriation and Quantity Summary FY2014 President's Budget / December 2012 SAR (TY$ M)
Program funding and production quantities listed in this SAR are consistent with the FY 2014 President's Budget (PB). The FY 2014 PB did not reflect the enacted DoD appropriation for FY 2013, nor sequestration; it reflected the President's requested amounts for FY 2013.
Appropriation Prior FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018To
Complete Total
RDT&E 510.0 75.1 78.2 77.4 74.7 49.9 19.9 55.2 940.4
Procurement 4.3 90.4 106.9 83.4 257.0 260.8 257.5 406.5 1466.8
MILCON 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.6
Acq O&M 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
PB 2014 Total 514.3 165.5 185.1 167.4 331.7 310.7 277.4 461.7 2413.8
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Quantity Undistributed Prior FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018To
Complete Total
Development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Production 0 0 2 3 2 8 8 8 14 45PB 2014 Total 0 0 2 3 2 8 8 8 14 45
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 20
Cost and Funding Annual Funding By Appropriation Annual Funding TY$ 1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Fiscal Year
Quantity
End Item Recurring Flyaway
TY $M
Non End Item
Recurring Flyaway
TY $M
Non Recurring Flyaway TY $M
Total Flyaway TY $M
Total Support TY $M
Total Program
TY $M
2004 -- -- -- -- -- -- 6.7
2005 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8.9
2006 -- -- -- -- -- -- 13.5
2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 37.2
2008 -- -- -- -- -- -- 88.8
2009 -- -- -- -- -- -- 127.4
2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 67.2
2011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 57.8
2012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 102.5
2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- 75.1
2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- 78.2
2015 -- -- -- -- -- -- 77.4
2016 -- -- -- -- -- -- 74.7
2017 -- -- -- -- -- -- 49.9
2018 -- -- -- -- -- -- 19.9
2019 -- -- -- -- -- -- 12.3
2020 -- -- -- -- -- -- 9.6
2021 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.5
2022 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2023 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.6
2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2025 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.7
2026 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2027 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.8
2028 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2029 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.9
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 21
2030 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2031 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.0
2032 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2033 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.1
2034 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2035 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.2
2036 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2037 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.4
2038 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2039 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.5
2040 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2041 -- -- -- -- -- -- 3.6
Subtotal -- -- -- -- -- -- 940.4
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 22
Annual Funding BY$ 1319 | RDT&E | Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation, Navy
Fiscal Year
Quantity
End Item Recurring Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Non End Item
Recurring Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Non Recurring Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Total Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Total Support
BY 2012 $M
Total Program
BY 2012 $M
2004 -- -- -- -- -- -- 7.8
2005 -- -- -- -- -- -- 10.1
2006 -- -- -- -- -- -- 14.8
2007 -- -- -- -- -- -- 39.8
2008 -- -- -- -- -- -- 93.3
2009 -- -- -- -- -- -- 132.2
2010 -- -- -- -- -- -- 68.7
2011 -- -- -- -- -- -- 57.6
2012 -- -- -- -- -- -- 100.1
2013 -- -- -- -- -- -- 72.0
2014 -- -- -- -- -- -- 73.5
2015 -- -- -- -- -- -- 71.4
2016 -- -- -- -- -- -- 67.7
2017 -- -- -- -- -- -- 44.3
2018 -- -- -- -- -- -- 17.4
2019 -- -- -- -- -- -- 10.5
2020 -- -- -- -- -- -- 8.1
2021 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2022 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2023 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2024 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2025 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2026 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2027 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2028 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2029 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2030 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2031 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.0
2032 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 23
2033 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.0
2034 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2035 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.0
2036 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2037 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2038 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2039 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.1
2040 -- -- -- -- -- -- --
2041 -- -- -- -- -- -- 2.0
Subtotal -- -- -- -- -- -- 912.0
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 24
Annual Funding TY$ 1109 | Procurement | Procurement, Marine Corps
Fiscal Year
Quantity
End Item Recurring Flyaway
TY $M
Non End Item
Recurring Flyaway
TY $M
Non Recurring Flyaway TY $M
Total Flyaway TY $M
Total Support TY $M
Total Program
TY $M
2012 -- -- -- 4.3 4.3 -- 4.3
2013 2 80.6 -- 2.4 83.0 7.4 90.4
2014 3 90.5 -- 9.3 99.8 7.1 106.9
2015 2 67.3 2.4 8.1 77.8 5.6 83.4
2016 8 234.5 1.2 -- 235.7 21.3 257.0
2017 8 236.5 2.5 -- 239.0 21.8 260.8
2018 8 233.6 2.7 -- 236.3 21.2 257.5
2019 8 211.8 1.3 -- 213.1 16.8 229.9
2020 6 158.9 1.7 -- 160.6 14.4 175.0
2021 -- -- -- -- -- 1.1 1.1
2022 -- -- -- -- -- 0.5 0.5
Subtotal 45 1313.7 11.8 24.1 1349.6 117.2 1466.8
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 25
Annual Funding BY$ 1109 | Procurement | Procurement, Marine Corps
Fiscal Year
Quantity
End Item Recurring Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Non End Item
Recurring Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Non Recurring Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Total Flyaway
BY 2012 $M
Total Support
BY 2012 $M
Total Program
BY 2012 $M
2012 -- -- -- 4.2 4.2 -- 4.2
2013 2 76.6 -- 2.3 78.9 7.0 85.9
2014 3 84.4 -- 8.7 93.1 6.6 99.7
2015 2 61.6 2.2 7.4 71.2 5.1 76.3
2016 8 210.5 1.1 -- 211.6 19.1 230.7
2017 8 208.4 2.2 -- 210.6 19.2 229.8
2018 8 202.0 2.3 -- 204.3 18.3 222.6
2019 8 179.7 1.1 -- 180.8 14.3 195.1
2020 6 132.3 1.4 -- 133.7 12.0 145.7
2021 -- -- -- -- -- 0.9 0.9
2022 -- -- -- -- -- 0.4 0.4
Subtotal 45 1155.5 10.3 22.6 1188.4 102.9 1291.3
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 26
Annual Funding TY$ 1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Fiscal Year
Total Program
TY $M
2015 6.6
Subtotal 6.6
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 27
Funding line has not been established; awaiting Military Construction (MILCON) approval.
Annual Funding BY$ 1205 | MILCON | Military Construction, Navy and Marine Corps
Fiscal Year
Total Program
BY 2012 $M
2015 5.9
Subtotal 5.9
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 28
Low Rate Initial Production There are no LRIP quantities until the Milestone C Decision which is scheduled for December 2013.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 29
Nuclear Cost
Foreign Military Sales
None
None
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 30
Unit Cost Unit Cost Report
BY2012 $M BY2012 $M
Unit Cost Current UCR
Baseline (MAY 2012 APB)
Current Estimate (DEC 2012 SAR)
BY % Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) Cost 2987.3 2209.2Quantity 57 45Unit Cost 52.409 49.093 -6.33
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC) Cost 2103.1 1291.3Quantity 57 45Unit Cost 36.896 28.696 -22.23
BY2012 $M BY2012 $M
Unit Cost Original UCR
Baseline (MAY 2012 APB)
Current Estimate (DEC 2012 SAR)
BY % Change
Program Acquisition Unit Cost (PAUC) Cost 2987.3 2209.2Quantity 57 45Unit Cost 52.409 49.093 -6.33
Average Procurement Unit Cost (APUC) Cost 2103.1 1291.3Quantity 57 45Unit Cost 36.896 28.696 -22.23
The Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase of the program is fully resourced in the FY 2014 President's Budget (PB) which also supports procurement of Air Defense/Surveillance Radar (AD/SR) G/ATOR Block 1 (GB1) and Ground Weapons Locating Radar (GWLR) G/ATOR Block 2 (GB2) for a total of forty-five (45) systems. The Navy is pursuing the resourcing of Expeditionary Air Surveillance Radar (EASR) G/ATOR Block 4 (GB4) as part of a future Budget Build for a total of twelve (12) systems. A total of fifty-seven (57) systems are authorized in the current Acquisition Program Baseline (APB).
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 31
Unit Cost History
BY2012 $M TY $MDate PAUC APUC PAUC APUC
Original APB MAY 2012 52.409 36.896 58.349 42.665APB as of January 2006 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ARevised Original APB N/A N/A N/A N/A N/APrior APB N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACurrent APB MAY 2012 52.409 36.896 58.349 42.665Prior Annual SAR N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ACurrent Estimate DEC 2012 49.093 28.696 53.640 32.596
SAR Unit Cost History
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
Initial PAUC Dev Est
Changes PAUC Current Est Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total
58.349 0.713 5.250 -0.209 0.000 -9.016 0.000 -1.447 -4.709 53.640
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 32
Current SAR Baseline to Current Estimate (TY $M)
Initial APUC Dev Est
Changes APUC Current Est Econ Qty Sch Eng Est Oth Spt Total
42.665 0.536 1.067 -0.209 0.000 -10.016 0.000 -1.447 -10.069 32.596
SAR Baseline History
Item/Event SAR
Planning Estimate (PE)
SAR Development Estimate (DE)
SAR Production
Estimate (PdE)
Current Estimate
Milestone A N/A N/A N/A N/AMilestone B N/A AUG 2005 N/A AUG 2005Milestone C N/A JUL 2013 N/A DEC 2013IOC N/A AUG 2016 N/A SEP 2016Total Cost (TY $M) N/A 3325.9 N/A 2413.8Total Quantity N/A 57 N/A 45Prog. Acq. Unit Cost (PAUC) N/A 58.349 N/A 53.640
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 33
Cost Variance
Summary Then Year $MRDT&E Proc MILCON Total
SAR Baseline (Dev Est) 887.6 2431.9 6.4 3325.9Previous Changes
Economic -- +4.4 -- +4.4Quantity -- -- -- --Schedule -- -- -- --Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating -- -4.4 -- -4.4Other -- -- -- --Support -- -- -- --
Subtotal -- -- -- --Current Changes
Economic +7.8 +19.7 +0.2 +27.7Quantity -- -464.0 -- -464.0Schedule -- -9.4 -- -9.4Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating +45.0 -446.3 -- -401.3Other -- -- -- --Support -- -65.1 -- -65.1
Subtotal +52.8 -965.1 +0.2 -912.1Total Changes +52.8 -965.1 +0.2 -912.1CE - Cost Variance 940.4 1466.8 6.6 2413.8CE - Cost & Funding 940.4 1466.8 6.6 2413.8
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 34
Summary Base Year 2012 $MRDT&E Proc MILCON Total
SAR Baseline (Dev Est) 878.2 2103.1 6.0 2987.3Previous Changes
Economic -- -- -- --Quantity -- -- -- --Schedule -- -- -- --Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating -- -3.5 -- -3.5Other -- -- -- --Support -- -0.2 -- -0.2
Subtotal -- -3.7 -- -3.7Current Changes
Economic -- -- -- --Quantity -- -369.7 -- -369.7Schedule -- -- -0.1 -0.1Engineering -- -- -- --Estimating +33.8 -385.4 -- -351.6Other -- -- -- --Support -- -53.0 -- -53.0
Subtotal +33.8 -808.1 -0.1 -774.4Total Changes +33.8 -811.8 -0.1 -778.1CE - Cost Variance 912.0 1291.3 5.9 2209.2CE - Cost & Funding 912.0 1291.3 5.9 2209.2
Previous Estimate: June 2012
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 35
RDT&E $M
Current Change ExplanationsBase Year
Then Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A +7.8Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) -2.9 -2.9Increase in cost estimate due to assumptions in technology refresh and associated
minor potential future change orders. (Estimating) +18.1 +18.8
Adjustment to reflect execution year adjustments (FY 2012). (Estimating) -4.1 -4.2Increase in cost estimate due to investment in production efficiency initiative.
(Estimating) +22.7 +33.3
RDT&E Subtotal +33.8 +52.8
Procurement $M
Current Change ExplanationsBase Year
Then Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A +19.7Total Quantity variance resulting from a decrease of 12 G/ATOR systems from 57 to 45.
(Subtotal) -369.0 -463.1
Quantity variance resulting from a decrease of 12 G/ATOR systems. (Quantity) (QR) (-369.7) (-464.0)
Allocation to Estimating resulting from Quantity change. (Estimating) (QR) (+0.7) (+0.9)Acceleration of procurement buy profile. FY 2014 President's Budget (PB) reflects
changing the production rate from 6 to 8 systems per year maximizing the production rate efficiencies. (Schedule)
0.0 -9.4
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Estimating) -0.3 -0.2Revised cost estimate due to anticipated production efficiencies associated with
funded design investments. (Estimating) -385.8 -447.0
Adjustment for current and prior escalation. (Support) +0.1 0.0Decrease in Initial Spares. Investment in efficiencies and economic order discounts has
reduced the level of support spares required. (Support) -42.0 -52.2
Decrease in Other Support. Investment in efficiencies and economic order discounts has reduced the level of other support required. (Support) -11.1 -12.9
Procurement Subtotal -808.1 -965.1 (QR) Quantity Related
MILCON $M
Current Change ExplanationsBase Year
Then Year
Revised escalation indices. (Economic) N/A +0.2Funding line has not been established; dollars have slipped one year to coincide with
the pending Military Construction (MILCON) cycle. (Schedule) -0.1 0.0
MILCON Subtotal -0.1 +0.2
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 36
Contracts
Appropriation: RDT&E Contract Name AD/SR (GB1) EMD Phase: EV Reporting Contractor Northrop Grumman Corporation Contractor Location 1580A W Nursery Road
Linthicum Heights, MD 21090 Contract Number, Type M67854-07-C-2072/1, CPIF Award Date March 30, 2007 Definitization Date March 30, 2007
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
92.9 N/A 1 394.0 N/A 1 417.0 421.0
Variance Cost Variance Schedule Variance Cumulative Variances To Date (2/23/2013) -24.4 -5.4 Previous Cumulative Variances -20.7 -4.0 Net Change -3.7 -1.4
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations The unfavorable net change in the cost variance is due to to unplanned additional integration, test, and software support for Developmental Test and Operational Assessment (DT/OA) efforts. Additional work was required to address system integration & software glitches and late material deliveries. The unfavorable net change in the schedule variance is due to delays completing developmental testing, software drops, missing material and firmware. These areas have been the dominant drivers and resulted in approximately a six week delay; this delay resulted in the program schedule misaligning with the testing opportunity at Yuma, Arizona forcing the operational assessment to be delayed until the fall. This is captured in the revised Program Manger's schedule estimate.
Contract Comments This contract is more than 90% complete; therefore, this is the final report for this contract. The difference between the Initial Contract Price Target and the Current Contract Price Target is due to program rebaselining associated with change from Acquisition Category (ACAT) II to ACAT I in 2009-2010. The remaining difference is attributed to additional cost and schedule variances. The basic contract includes the Engineering and Manufacturing Development (EMD) phase and Low Rate Initial Production (LRIP) units.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 37
Appropriation: RDT&E Contract Name AD/SR (GB1) EMD Phase: Non-EV Reporting Contractor Northrop Grumman Corporation Contractor Location 1580A W Nursery Road
Linthicum Heights, MD 21090 Contract Number, Type M67854-07-C-2072/2, FFP Award Date March 30, 2007 Definitization Date March 30, 2007
Initial Contract Price ($M) Current Contract Price ($M) Estimated Price At Completion ($M) Target Ceiling Qty Target Ceiling Qty Contractor Program Manager
15.6 N/A N/A 15.6 N/A N/A 15.6 15.6
Cost And Schedule Variance Explanations Cost and Schedule variance reporting is not required on this FFP contract.
Contract Comments This is the first time this contract is being reported. Effort is a part of the CPIF contract, but theseare Level Of Effort in nature and are not a part of the Earned Value (EV)reporting CLINs on this contract vehicle. These CLINs are not in direct support of the Engineering and Manufacturing Development Phase.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 38
Deliveries and Expenditures
The above data is current as of 3/31/2013.
Deliveries To Date Plan To Date Actual To Date Total Quantity Percent Delivered
Development 0 0 0 -- Production 0 0 45 0.00% Total Program Quantities Delivered 0 0 45 0.00%
Expenditures and Appropriations (TY $M) Total Acquisition Cost 2413.8 Years Appropriated 10 Expenditures To Date 505.4 Percent Years Appropriated 26.32% Percent Expended 20.94% Appropriated to Date 679.8 Total Funding Years 38 Percent Appropriated 28.16%
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 39
Operating and Support Cost
G/ATOR Assumptions and Ground RulesCost Estimate Reference: The source of this estimate is the Program Life Cycle Cost Estimate (PLCCE) of September 2012. Sustainment Strategy: The sustainment strategy includes organic support with contract support for the depot level. The total Authorized Acquisition Objective (AAO) is 45. Service Life is 20 years. Antecedent Information: There is no data in the Navy Visibility and Management of Operating and Support Costs (VAMOSC) database for the antecedent system. The program office, working with the Department of the Navy Headquarters and Office of the Secretary of Defense staff, will continue to explore alternative cost data sources of antecedent systems to supply this information.
Unitized O&S Costs BY2012 $M
Cost ElementG/ATOR
Average Annual Cost Per System
AN/TPS-63B Radar (Antecedent)
SystemUnit-Level Manpower 0.3 0.0Unit Operations 0.0 0.0Maintenance 1.2 0.0Sustaining Support 0.4 0.0Continuing System Improvements 0.5 0.0Indirect Support 0.0 0.0Other 0.0 0.0Total 2.4 --
Unitized Cost Comments: None
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 40
Total O&S Cost $M
Current Development APB
Objective/ThresholdCurrent Estimate
G/ATOR G/ATOR AN/TPS-63B Radar (Antecedent)
Base Year 2610.0 2871.0 2189.0 N/AThen Year 3513.0 N/A 3083.0 N/A
Total O&S Costs Comments: Total O&S variance is associated with anticipated producibility enhancements resulting in sustainment efficiencies. Disposal Costs TY Disposal cost are $9M. BY Disposal cost are $6M. These cost are not included in the O&S figures above.
G/ATOR December 31, 2012 SAR
May 21, 2013 16:06:06 UNCLASSIFIED 41