Segment I Telepathy/antediluvian language, tower of · PDF fileSegment I...
-
Upload
truongkien -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Segment I Telepathy/antediluvian language, tower of · PDF fileSegment I...
Doc Green Show II 1
Segment I Telepathy/antediluvian language, tower of babel
NUM 22:27 And when the ass saw the angel of the LORD, she fell down under
Balaam: and Balaam's anger was kindled, and he smote the ass with a staff.
NUM 22:28 And the LORD opened the mouth of the ass, and she said unto Balaam,
What have I done unto thee, that thou hast smitten me these three times?
GEN 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the
LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall
not eat of every tree of the garden?
GEN 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the
trees of the garden:
GEN 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God
hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
GEN 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Plato on humans communicating with animals prior to the flood:
“….. Y. Soc. Certainly that is quite consistent with what has preceded; but tell me, was
the life which you said existed in the reign of Cronos in that cycle of the world, or in this?
For the change in the course of the stars and the sun must have occurred in both.
Str. I see that you enter into my meaning;-no, that blessed and spontaneous life does not
belong to the present cycle of the world, but to the previous one, in which God
superintended the whole revolution of the universe; and the several parts the universe
were distributed under the rule. certain inferior deities, as is the way in some places still
There were demigods, who were the shepherds of the various species and herds of
animals, and each one was in all respects sufficient for those of whom he was the
shepherd; neither was there any violence, or devouring of one another or war or quarrel
among them; and I might tell of ten thousand other blessings, which belonged to that
dispensation. The reason why the life of man was, as tradition says, spontaneous, is as
follows: In those days God himself was their shepherd, and ruled over them, just as man,
over them, who is by comparison a divine being, still rules over the lower animals. Under
him there were no forms of government or separate possession of women and children;
for all men rose again from the earth, having no memory, of the past. And although they
had nothing of this sort, the earth gave them fruits in abundance, which grew on trees and
shrubs unbidden, and were not planted by the hand of man. And they dwelt naked, and
mostly in the open air, for the temperature of their seasons, was mild; and they had no
beds, but lay on Soft couches of grass, which grew plentifully out of: the earth. Such was
the life of man in the days of Cronos, Socrates; the character of our present life which is
Doc Green Show II 2
said to be under Zeus, you know from your own experience. Can you, and will you,
determine which of them you deem the happier?
Y. Soc. Impossible.
Str. Then shall I determine for you as well as I can?
Y. Soc. By all means.
Str. Suppose that the nurslings of Cronos, having this boundless leisure, and the
power of holding intercourse, not only with men, but with the brute creation, had
used all these advantages with a view to philosophy, conversing with the brutes as
well as with one another, and learning of every nature which was gifted with any
special power, and was able to contribute some special experience to the store of
wisdom there would be no difficulty in deciding that they would be a thousand
times happier than the men of our own day. Or, again, if they had merely eaten
and drunk until they were full, and told stories to one another and to the animals-
such stories as are now attributed to them-in this case also, as I should imagine,
the answer would be easy. But until some satisfactory witness can be found of the
love of that age for knowledge and: discussion, we had better let the matter drop,
and give the reason why we have unearthed this tale, and then we shall be able to
get on….”
GEN 11:1 And the whole earth was of one language, and of one speech….
“One language, few words” Lisa Beth Liel and James
Cohn, Julian Jaynes Soc Charleston WVa.
The words “priest” and “prophet” do not occur in Genesis prior to the flood.
Microevolution and human languages
The biggest problem for anybody wishing to believe in any sort of macro evolution for languages
is the Indo-European/Semitic divide. There is no meaningful racial difference between the two
groups and there is no reason to believe that they might have split up more than a few thousand
years ago. You would expect the two groups of languages to be strongly related and, yet, other
than for a few borrowed words, they do not appear to be related at all.
Doc Green Show II 3
To get some idea of how many things remain recognizable between Indo-European languages,
let us imagine for a moment that a person who spoke only English were to decide to make
Russian his first foreign language to study. In other words, rather than studying a language
which split from yours 1000 or 1500 years ago as would be the case of an English speaker
studying German, let’s see what happens when you go to study a language which split from
yours two or three thousand years ago. This person would certainly experience enough pain with
the system of declensions and verb aspects, but he/she would find a startling number of things
that were familiar:
• Numbers: nearly all the same or at least recognizable
• Family members: nearly the same.
• Personal pronouns: nearly the same or at least recognizable
• Common things: fire (‘ah-gon’, like ignite/ignition/Agni); water (‘vod-ah’); wine
(‘veenoh’); wind (‘vyeter’, like vent, ventilator etc.)
• P/F words
• D/G words
• Common household things: knife/nozh, spoon/ladle/Loeffel/lozhka, kettle/kot-yohl etc.
• Old/very-old IE roots: it (step)/идти/iterate/itinerary
• Feudal relationships: dolg/dolzhen (debt, obligation) = do + L-G (as in liege lord),
delegate, relegate, obligate, allegience etc.
Actual evidence suggests a total change in the manner in which humans communicate.
Evidence for Telepathy in Today’s World
Rupert Sheldrake is a former director of studies for cell biology at Cambridge University who, in
later life, has taken up the study of things normally termed "paranormal,” using good
experimental design and statistical methodology. Thus his use of statistical methods to
investigate the phenomenon of people guessing correctly most of the time whether or not they
are being stared at by others is entirely in keeping with the manner in which the science of
statistics is meant to be used. In the case of dogs who appear to know the first moment their
owner heads for home (some dogs are observed going to sit at the door when their owners begin
their journeys home), Sheldrake has devised a simple and elegant test. He has had dog owners
set out on window-shopping tours along with one of his (Sheldrake's) assistants with only the
assistant knowing the predetermined time to start home. Sure enough, in such cases when the
owner is told that the time to return home has arrived, the dog has dutifully gone to the door as
noted by another assistant who would remain at the owner's home.
By these and other methods, Sheldrake has demonstrated to a statistical certainty that a number
of things normally designated as paranormal, are real. Naturally enough this has earned him the
animosity of the CSICOP2 crowd and of other professional skeptics.
Sheldrake has also noted that major league computational power, until recently, was an exclusive
prerogative of government agencies, large corporations, and large universities, but that the
Doc Green Show II 4
common man now has access to such computing power and, with it, significant scientific
investigation on the cheap. His "Seven Experiments that Could Change the World" is a book
that everybody should have.3
There is no shortage of Sheldrake’s works and opinions on YouTube; “Rupert Sheldrake” is a
good YouTube search any time you have an hour to kill and are near a computer.
Ganz-Feld experiments conducted by Dean Radin and other researchers also turn up a high
degree of statistical significance in the extent to which human subjects in white-noise
environments are actually able to transmit information one to another.
Thus based on a number of Sheldrake's results and related/similar studies, there is substantial
reason to believe that there is at least some kind of a minimal telepathic capability amongst
humans and other higher animals even today. But what about the past? Is there reason to
believe that what Sheldrake describes is a REMNANT of a much more significant telepathic
capability from past ages?
Julian Jaynes
Doc Green Show II 5
Jaynes stops just short of thinking that the oracles had to be producing real information:
“..The obdurate rationalist simply scoffs plena deo indeed! Just as the mediums of our
own times have always been exposed as frauds, so these so-called oracles were really
performances manipulated by others in front of an illiterate peasantry for political or
monetary ends. But such a realpolitik attitude is doctrinaire at best. Possibly there was
some chicanery in the oracle’s last days, perhaps some bribery of the prophetes, those
subsidiary priests or priestesses who interpreted what the oracle meant. But earlier, to
sustain so massive a fraud for an entire millennium through the most brilliant intellectual
civilization the world had yet known is impossible, just impossible. Nor can it gibe with
the complete absence of criticism of the oracle until the Roman period. Nor with the
politically wise and often cynical Plato reverently calling Delphi “the interpreter of
religion to all mankind.”
Al DeGrazia and Hugh Crossthwaite
Now up on Bearfabrique.org
When you see de Grazia and Crossthwaite describing certain ancient phenomena as electrostatic
and Julian Jaynes describing those same phenomena as paranormal/bicameral, you don’t need to
be Nikola Tesla to add two and two together and understand that the electrostatic phenomena
were enabling the bicameral things.
Doc Green Show II 6
Communications amongst humans before the flood were telepathic in nature, other
than for a small vocabulary of spoken words used by priests for ritualistic purposes.
This was enabled by the electrostatic charge near the Earths surface and by the plasma
of the antique solar system in general, and involved the use of the right side of the
human brain as Julian Jaynes notes. When this system of communication broke down
after the flood due to electrostatic collapse, humans were forced to very quickly
develop the kinds of speech we use now. There never were super-families of
languages; the main language families are unrelated.
After the flood and the event described in the story of the tower of Babel, continued
attempts to use the human mind and brain as mankind once had led to
the dysfunctional state of which we read in the main books of the Old Testament and
to the gradual breakdown of the "bicameral system" which Julian Jaynes described,
until the very capability of using the human mind that way was, in all but the rarest
cases, ground out of the human race by a process of attrition.
Doc Green Show II 7
Segment II Rehash basic GH ideas, prehistoric
multiplanetary civilization,
Secret space program conference in Bastrop Tx late 2015
Cities and structures beneath the waves, Okinawa, Cuba, Azores…
Earth’s moon, abandoned space craft
Doc Green Show II 8
Phobos:
Doc Green Show II 9
Face megalith at Cydonia region
Doc Green Show II 10
D&M Pyramid at Cydonia
Ganymede
Doc Green Show II 11
Segment III Mars images
Viking probe 76, first hint
Doc Green Show II 12
Doc Green Show II 13
Doc Green Show II 14
Doc Green Show II 15
Doc Green Show II 16
Those images show:
• Clear remains of cities and villages, with roads, bridges, buildings and other
urban infrastructure.
• Remains of large scale infrastructure.
• Remains of walls with fitted stones.
• Remains of the foundations of buildings.
• Remaining trees and vegetation.
• Water both flowing and standing. Such pools and streams are frequently seen
in near proximity to artifacts of past habitation.
• Mechanical junk and debris strewn across the sands. Most of those kinds of
items are obviously artificial but of unknown usage but occasionally you see
something easily recognizable, gear wheels and cogs, tires, axles, funnels,
padlocks and similarly common items.
• Obvious gateways and portals to underground areas.
• One of Mars’ small moons, Phobos, turns out to be artificial, an ancient space
station of some sort.
• Living creatures. The air at Mars’ surface is said to be about like that on Earth
at 15,000 feet. Creatures which you’d expect to see under such conditions and
which survived the catastrophes somehow or other include insects, snake which
are cold blooded, and small mammals which will have a relatively easy time
with the thin air due to their natural square/cube advantage. Recent images in
fact show all of those things. Unless a catastrophe were to annihilate a planet
altogether, no catastrophe could ever kill all the mice and rats on a planet like
Mars and those mice and rats need something to chase them. Several recent
NASA images clearly show little foxes or weasels which, apparently, also
survived whatever happened.
Doc Green Show II 17
Doc Green Show II 18
Remains of walls and fitted stones
Doc Green Show II 19
Mechanical junk
Doc Green Show II 20
Doc Green Show II 21
Gateways to underground areas
Remains of structures
Doc Green Show II 22
Doc Green Show II 23
Doc Green Show II 24
Doc Green Show II 25
Doc Green Show II 27
Doc Green Show II 28
Doc Green Show II 29
All of this, I believe, is what is behind the NASA secrecy. Anything else they
could have at least come up with some feeble attempt at an explanation for without
Doc Green Show II 30
having to totally toss and jettison their entire theory of a history of our solar
system, or at least without having to look flagrant about it. Assuming that NASA
actually has made contact with indigenous humans living on Mars, a number of
questions arise fairly quickly:
• Do these people know much more about human prehistory than we do, have
better records going back to and possibly beyond the catastrophes than we
do?
• Do theyy know anything about antediluvian civilizations on our own planet
or other bodies within our own solar system which we don’t know?
• Do they have any physical or mental capabilities which we don’t have?
• Do they have any technologies which we might be interested in?
• Does contact with us represent any danger to them or vice versa?
Keeping bigsecrets invites conspiracy theories. NASA should not be keeping
this stuff secret.
Doc Green Show II 31
Segment IV Saturn theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RtGal_-KXU&t=1563s
https://www.maverickscience.com
http://www.everythingselectric.com/saturn-sun/
http://qdl.scs-inc.us/2ndParty/Pages/11007.html
http://www.thunderbolts.info
http://www.saturndeathcult.com
Doc Green Show II 32
Doc Green Show II 33
Doc Green Show II 34
Doc Green Show II 35
Doc Green Show II 36
Doc Green Show II 37
Doc Green Show II 38