Sector de Seguretat i Mobilitat 1 Urban Mobility Plan of Barcelona 2006-2012-2018 Initial proposal...

1 Sector de Seguretat i Mobilitat

Urban Mobility Plan of Barcelona2006-2012-2018Initial proposal

15-12-2005


In accordance with the Mobility law and the Mobility Director Plan of the Metropolitan district and the National Mobility Guidelines:

• Sustenaible mobility management.• Improve the road safety.• Encourage public transport.• Get a better road discipline.• Rationalize the private car use.• Get more pedestrian spaces.• Increase the bicycle leading role.• Provide new management elements and give alternatives for

urban delivery.• Get a cleaner air and a better quality of life. • ...

PMU objective


Generic aims definition

• Increase the accessibility of people with reduced mobility.

• Adapt the public transport supply to the changing behaviour of the citizens mobility.

Fair mobility Sustenaible mobility Safe mobility Efficient mobility

• A coordinate and rationale management for the whole mobility system.

• Encourage the quality, intermodality and the ticket integration system in the public transport.

• Reduce the number and severity of road accidents.

• Improve the assistance to road accident victims.

• Reduce the gas emission with efect global warming.

• Give to pedestrians and bicycle the same consideration as the main transport mode.


Fair mobility• Improve the accessibility of persons with limited mobility.

• Garantee of the mobility right to the people without private cars(specially young people and elderly).

• Adapt the public transport supply to the changing needs of the citizens mobility.

• Garantee the land and time coverage in the municipal developed areas with public transport.

Generic aims


Sustenaible Mobility

• Reduce the global warming efect.

• Reduce the atmospheric pollution.

• Reduce the visual impact of the transport infrastructures.

• Reduce the consumption of no renewable energy.

• Giving to pedestrians and bicycles the whole consideration of modes of transport.

• Expand the public transport contribution to internal and external trips.

Generic aims


Safe mobility

Reduce the number and severity of road accidents.

• Reduce the speed of cars.

• Protect pedestrians and cyclists from the motorized traffic.

• Improve the assistance to road accident victims.

Objectives


Efficient mobility

• Obtain a coordinate management of the whole mobility system.

• Reduce the trip time, congestion specially.

• Encourage the quality, the intermodality and the fare integration in the public transport.

• Improve the mobility sistem knowledge and his functioning.

Objectives


Scope

Citizen behaviour

Public space management and infraestructures

Proper vehicles

Mobility observatory


SCOPE

AIMS

Citizens behaviour Public spacemanagment andof foundations

Proper Vehicles Mobility observatory

Fair Mobility

- Surveillance ofrights and duttyperformance ofpedestrians andcyclists.

- A new manualof criterions forurbanizationandinfraestructureprojects

- Adaptation thepublic transportfleet to the E.U.directives.

- Evaluation ofexternal costsproduced by thetransport sector

Sustainable Mobility

- didactic materialissue aboutalternativemobility modes

- Implement anew bus lanessegregated

- Encouragementthe use of lessnoisy vehicles

- Meter the transportpollution emissions.

Safe Mobility

- Advertisingcampaignmanaged to theprevention ofroad accidents

- Implement aprogressivetraffic calmingplan in thesecondarynetwork

- Participation ofresearch projectsabout active andpassive safety

- Research ofdangerous pointsand roads withmore roadaccidents

Efficient Mobility

- Encouragementof car sharingand car pulling.

- developement,extension andimprovementof trafficmanagementtools

- Encouragementof the use ofrenewable energyand of moreefficient fuels

- Evaluation of thetraffic congestioncost.

Aims vs Scopes


• Central city (yellow): 1,5

milions inhabitants and the

higest density level ( Barcelona

municipality).

• Metropolitan area (green):

central build-up in the RMB with

2,7 milions inhabitants.

• Metropolitan region: 4,4

milions inhabitants, the 70% of

the population of Catalonia.

In Barcelona there are the 43% of jobs, only

the 35% of population with a job live in the

city.

PMU scope


Font: Dades Bàsiques de Mobilitat 2004 de l’Ajuntament de Barcelona

Internal-external trips : 2.573.000 (38%)2.573.000 (38%)

Internal trips: 4.150.000 (62%)4.150.000 (62%)

Year 2004

On foot46,0%

Private23,8%

Public30,2%

Year 2004

Every working day 6,7 milions of trips with origin and/or destinacion to Barcelona, (4,7 M in 1986 + 2% annual):

• 35% by public transport • 33% by private cars• 32% by bicycle and on foot

Mobility in Barcelona. Main figures

Private48,9%

On foot8,6%

Public42,5%


In the last 6 years the total number of trips in the city has increased in a 14%, (+2,7% annual).

BARCELONA 2004. SITUACIÓ ACTUAL

The foresight for the year 2018 is 9,5 milions of trips every day, with an important growth of the mobility that comes from the Metropolitan Area (2,7% total/1,8% internal+ 4,5% connection).

• Public transport growth: +13%• Private has increased +10% • On foot and by bicycle with +22%

increase

Mobility evolution. Main figures


Then we have simulated progressive reductions of the number of trips by private mode until we have obtained a sustenaible mobility standard

In every scenary we plan a quantified transfer from private mode to public, separeting the trip relating to origin-destination and type of vehicle.

Scenary Applyed hipotesi

A Maintenance of the actual tendency to growth

B 15% reduction of the private transport growth regarding the scene A andchange to mass and soft ways

C 30% reduction of the private transport growth regarding the scene A andchange to mass and soft ways

D Level of the free flow in the network similar to actual

E Observance of the Kyoto protocol (not incorporating technologicalimprovements)

Mobility alternative scenaries


Mobility alternative sceneries

Indicator Actual situation(2004) scenery 2006 scenery 2012

Total veh x km (area Rondes) 16.002.545 16.686.628 19.024.062

number of veh x km w ith LS > 90 % 2.074.757 2.369.882 3.245.914

%vehic. x km > 90 % 13,00% 14,20% 17,10%

average trip lenght (kms) 6,38 6,65 7,58

average speed(kms/h) 30,1 29,54 25,1

average trip time(minutes) 12,72 13,51 18,13

running speed(kms/h) 35 35 35

travel time (minuts) 10,94 11,4 13

w aiting time (minuts) 1,78 2,11 5,13

number of stops 5,1 6 14,7

% w aiting time 14% 16% 28%

stops / minute 0,4 0,4 0,8

comfort index (1 a 10) (1) 1,8 1,4 0,4

access time to the center of BCN 7,3 7,5 9

Table of comparative sceneries



Indicator 2018 Hipòtesi A 2018 Hipòtesi B 2018 Hipòtesi C 2018 Hipòtesi D 2018 Hipòtesi E

Total veh x km (area Rondes) 20.808.713 19.431.079 18.459.592 17.443.159 13.230.577

number of veh x km w ith LS > 90 % 5.105.680 4.093.248 3.103.105 2.481.766 1.240.871

%vehic. x km > 90 % 24,50% 21,10% 16,80% 14,20% 9,40%

average trip lenght (kms) 8,3 7,75 7,36 6,95 6,12

average speed(kms/h) 21,5 25,3 28,3 29,3 32,4

average trip time(minutes) 23,15 18,37 15,6 14,24 11,33

running speed(kms/h) 35 35 35 35 35

travel time (minuts) 14,22 13,28 12,62 11,92 10,49

w aiting time (minuts) 8,93 5,09 2,99 2,32 0,84

number of stops 25,5 14,5 8,5 6,6 2,4

% w aiting time 39% 28% 19% 16% 7%

stops / minute 1,1 0,8 0,5 0,5 0,2

comfort index (1 a 10) (1) 0,2 0,5 1 1,3 6,3

access time to the center of BCN 10,6 8,9 7,9 7,6 6,8

Table of comparative sceneries



Comfort Index =10/((1+stops/min)*(1+%stopped time)*(0.8+%saturated network))

-

5.000.000

10.000.000

15.000.000

20.000.000

25.000.000

Actua

l situ

ation

(200

4)es

cena

ry 2

006

esce

nary

201

2

year

201

8 Hipo

tesi

A

year

201

8 Hipo

tesi

B

year

201

8 Hipo

tesi

C

Year 2

018

Hipote

si D

year

201

8 Hipo

tesi

E

Total veh x km(area Rondes)

Number of veh xkm amb LS > 90%


We have made a quantitative approach to the transport

modes transfers necessary for arrive, in 2018, a situation of

modal splead compatible to keep a reasonable quality of life.

To obtain in 2018 this objectives, we have considered a chain of

intermediate scenaries with horizon the year 2012, that

have been constructed with the intention to make the shift in a

gradual way, with less change in the period 2006–2012

( 40%) and higher in the period 2012–2018 (the other

60%).



2012 2018Mode of transport year 2000 year 2006 year 2012 (A) year 2012(D) year 2018(A) year 2018(D)PRIVATE 2.160.467 2.362.268 2.654.298 2.343.029 2.946.328 2.419.424PUBLIC 2.198.600 2.486.200 2.923.361 3.112.072 3.360.523 3.864.967ON FOOT 1.782.583 2.143.208 2.712.693 2.669.444 3.282.177 3.304.637TOTAL 6.141.650 6.991.676 8.290.352 8.124.545 9.589.028 9.589.028

Mode of transport year 2000 year 2006 year 2012 (A) year 2012(D) year 2018(A) year 2018(D)PRIVATE 35% 34% 32% 29% 31% 25%PUBLIC 36% 36% 35% 38% 35% 40%ON FOOT 29% 31% 33% 33% 34% 34%TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

0

2.000.000

4.000.000

6.000.000

8.000.000

10.000.000

12.000.000

any 2000 any 2006 any 2012 (A) any 2018(A)

TOTAL

TP (A)

TP (D)



-

1 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

2 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

3 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

4 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

5 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

6 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

7 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

1 2 3 4

T O T A L

T P A

T P D

Mode of transport year 2000 year 2006 year 2012(A) year 2012(D) year 2018(A) year 2018(D)PRIVATE 988.667 1.026.667 1.162.769 1.020.364 1.298.871 1.055.710 PUBLIC 1.419.000 1.314.000 1.449.985 1.530.825 1.585.970 1.810.132

ON FOOT 1.646.583 2.094.208 2.650.673 2.606.969 3.207.137 3.226.136 TOTAL 4.054.250 4.434.875 5.263.426 5.158.158 6.091.977 6.091.977

Mode of transport year 2000 year 2006 year 2012(A) year 2012(D) year 2018(A) year 2018(D)PRIVATE 24% 23% 22% 20% 21% 17%PUBLIC 35% 30% 28% 30% 26% 30%

ON FOOT 41% 47% 50% 51% 53% 53%TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Internal trips



-

5 0 0 .0 0 0

1 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

1 .5 0 0 .0 0 0

2 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

2 .5 0 0 .0 0 0

3 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

3 .5 0 0 .0 0 0

4 .0 0 0 .0 0 0

1 2 3 4

T O T A L

T P A

T P D

Mode of transport year 2000 year 2006 year 2012(A) year 2012(D) year 2018(A) year 2018(D)PRIVATE 1.171.800 1.335.601 1.491.529 1.322.665 1.647.457 1.363.714 PUBLIC 779.600 1.172.200 1.473.377 1.581.247 1.774.553 2.054.835

ON FOOT 136.000 49.000 62.020 62.476 75.040 78.501 TOTAL 2.087.400 2.556.801 3.026.926 2.966.387 3.497.051 3.497.051

Mode of transport year 2000 year 2006 year 2012(A) year 2012(D) year 2018(A) year 2018(D)PRIVATE 56% 52% 49% 45% 47% 39%PUBLIC 37% 46% 49% 53% 51% 59%

ON FOOT 7% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

CONNECTION TRIPS



• The actual socioeconomic development makes assumption a mobility

sustained growth in parallel with the GDP growth and the

population.

•The current tendency seems to indicate a behaviour more sustenaible

for internal trips in the city of Barcelona than for people who access from

the Metropolitan Area.

•As the metropolitan area people mainly use the private car mode, we

have to achieve the enough change of users from this mode to the public

transport.

•Achieving a public transport network effective, efficient and sustenaible,

with the actual territorial stucture, to structure networks in a

hierarchical manner, where the basic transport modes would be

railway and structuring the others with a feeder of the railway network.

Conclusions


Operator’s distributions supply and ATM scope (2004)

100%141,8Total 1ª ring

-259,9TOTAL

-62,5Suburbs RENFE (all STI)

100%54,5Total out of STI

19,1%10,4Other urban buses

50,8%27,7Autonomous government buses

30,1%16,4Rest FGC

out STI

0,8%1,1Tram

15,0%21,3Other buses EMT

28,8%40,9TB

8,5%12,0FGC

46,9%66,5FMB

1ª ring STI

%milions of

people·kmOperatorScope

Public transport: Actual supply


10.7205.729Internal - external

1.283446InternalSCENARY E

7.9194.328Internal – external

1.007388Internal SCENARY D


947375Internal SCENARY C


885362Internal SCENARY B


604316Internal SCENARY A

Year 2018Year 2012Inversion (M€)

Scenary and temporal investment


• To increase the subway frequency (from 3’ to 2’), moreover,

there is a capacity reserve that we can make progress

modernizing the security systems.

• Reorganizating and increasing the metropolitan services of

State Railways as a consequence of the new H.S. railway

station in Barcelona.

• Implementation of new modal interchange points and

improvement of connection points between diferent

railway lines operators.

• Accessibility improvement in handicaped people, quality

of service and safety.

Proposals 2012 (Included in PDI)


• Use of new equipment for the biggest capacity/double

composition suburbs trains.

• Carrying out of modal interchange points and Park&Ride

appropiate explotation.

• BUS-HOV lane in the city access roads and increasing the

bus lane network with bigger enforcement.

• Use of contactless tickets to reduce the bus stop time.

• Reestructuring the taxi supply, redistributing services for

improve the temporal and space covering(stops).

Proposals 2012

Sector de Seguretat i Mobilitat 1 Urban Mobility Plan of Barcelona 2006-2012-2018 Initial proposal...

Documents

Transcript of Sector de Seguretat i Mobilitat 1 Urban Mobility Plan of Barcelona 2006-2012-2018 Initial proposal...