Second Edition Competency Evaluation Tools
Transcript of Second Edition Competency Evaluation Tools
Karen Zander, RN, MS, CMAC, FAAN
Second Edition
T H E C E N T E R F O R C A S E M A N A G E M E N T
C C M
T H E C E N T E R F O R C A S E M A N A G E M E N T
C C M
Competency Evaluation Tools Case Management Professionals Case Management
for
Karen Zander, RN, MS, CMAC, FAAN
Second Edition
Competency Evaluation
Tools
Case Management Professionals
for
T H E C E N T E R F O R C A S E M A N A G E M E N T
C C M
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition, is published by HCPro, Inc.
Copyright © 2009 HCPro, Inc.
All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN: 978-1-60146-652-5
No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without prior written consent of HCPro, Inc., or the
Copyright Clearance Center (978/750-8400). Please notify us immediately if you have received an unauthorized copy.
HCPro, Inc., provides information resources for the healthcare industry.
HCPro, Inc., is not affiliated in any way with The Joint Commission, which owns the JCAHO and Joint Commission trademarks.
Karen Zander, RN, MS, CMAC, FAAN, Author Amanda Donaldson, Copyeditor
Julie McGinley, Editor Amy Cohen, Proofreader
Ilene MacDonald, Executive Editor Matt Sharpe, Production Supervisor
Lauren McLeod, Group Publisher Susan Darbyshire, Art Director
Mike Mirabello, Senior Graphic Artist Jean St. Pierre, Director of Operations
Advice given is general. Readers should consult professional counsel for specific legal, ethical, or clinical questions.
Arrangements can be made for quantity discounts. For more information, contact:
HCPro, Inc.
P.O. Box 1168
Marblehead, MA 01945
Telephone: 800/650-6787 or 781/639-1872
Fax: 781/639-2982
E-mail: [email protected]
Visit HCPro at its World Wide Web sites:
www.hcpro.com and www.hcmarketplace.com
09/200921712
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. iii
Contents
About the Author ...................................................................................................................................................... v
Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................................. vi
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use ............................................................................................ vii
Chapter 1: Case Management Administrator/Director Competency Evaluation Tool .................................... 1
Chapter 2: Access/Liaison Function Competency Evaluation Tool ................................................................. 11
Chapter 3: Emergency Department Case Manager Competency Evaluation Tool ........................................ 21
Chapter 4: Utilization Review/Utilization Management Competency Evaluation Tool .................................. 33
Chapter 5: Clinical Documentation (Improvement) Specialist: RN Competency Evaluation Tool ............... 45
Chapter 6: Care Coordination Competency Evaluation Tool ............................................................................ 57
Chapter 7: Integrated Case Manager Role: UR/Care Coordination/
Discharge Planning Evaluation Tool .................................................................................................................... 65
Chapter 8: Discharge Planning Competency Evaluation Tool .......................................................................... 79
Chapter 9: Disease Management Professional Competency Evaluation Tool ............................................... 89
Chapter 10: Clinical Social Work (MSW) Competency Evaluation Tool ......................................................... 97
Chapter 11: Physician Advisor/Medical Director, Case Management Competency Evaluation Tool ....... 107
Case Management Narrative: When I Made a Difference ............................................................................ 117
Continuing Education Instructional Guide ........................................................................................................ 121
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. v
About the Author
Karen Zander, RN, MS, CMAC, FAAN
Karen Zander, RN, MS, CMAC, FAAN, is principal and co-owner—with Kathleen Bower—of
The Center for Case Management, Inc. Their pioneering work with clinical case manage ment
and CareMap® systems, begun at New England Medical Center Hospitals in Boston, is inter-
nationally recognized. Hospitals and Health Networks named her a cutting-edge leader.
Zander is the coauthor of Emergency Department Case Management: Strategies for Creating and
Sustaining a Successful Program and Hospital Case Management Models: Evidence for Connecting the
Boardroom to the Bedside, published by HCPro, Inc. She is a member of the credentialing board
for the Case Management Administrator Certification exam. She has two grown daughters and
lives with her husband, 98-year-old mother, and 14-year-old dog, Pepper.
vi Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
Acknowledgments
Karen thanks colleagues who have continued to evolve the definition of competencies for
emerging specialties within case management. Specifically for this edition are thanks to
Kimberly Barry, Seth Blumberg, MD, Kathleen Bower, Arinda Skinner Kennedy, and
Kathy Walsh.
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. vii
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
Learning Objectives:
1. Define competency in relation to case management
2. Differentiate between the three domains of competency evaluated in this toolkit
3. Explain the challenge of evaluating case management professionals
4. Identify the distinct functions that make up the case management role
5. Analyze an individual’s performance based on his or her competency level
6. Recognize how to encourage an individual to advance from one competency level to the next
Complete Set of Competency Evaluation Tools
• Case Management Administrator/Director
• Access and/or Liaison
• RN Case Manager, Emergency Department (NEW)
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
viii Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
• Utilization Review/Utilization Management
• Clinical Documentation (Improvement) Specialist: RN (NEW)
• Care Coordination/Care Facilitation
• Discharge/Transition Planning
• Integrated Role: Utilization Review, Care Coordination, and Discharge Planning (NEW)
• Disease Management
• Clinical Social Work (MSW-Prepared)
• Physician Advisor or Medical Director
Case management is an evolving service in acute care hospitals because it is increasingly ac-
knowl edged as the linking pin between many goals and targets. Case management services,
through an array of discreet functions, bring quality, financial satisfaction, and other goals
together at the patient-care level. In other words, case management people in specific roles
connect the boardroom with the bedside.1 Case management professionals work in the service
of the patient and family, but also within the context of the reality of reimbursement and the
efficiency needs of acute care hospitals. Nurses, social workers, physicians, and others working
in case management provide the engine that drives throughput as each patient and family
receives a customized journey into, through, and beyond the hospital level of care.
What Is Competency?
A competent case management professional conducts an intentional practice in which the inter-
ventions that are made are based on an accurate assessment, an effective working rela tion ship
with many people, and a specific goal. Good results in case management don’t usually happen
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. ix
by accident (although they may occur by luck at times). Patients and their families, as well as
healthcare professionals, assume that case managers, social workers, and physicians working
within case management services will be totally competent.
Competency is not only the visible performance of a role or job, but also the sum total of the
knowledge and values that people bring to the table to carry out their responsibilities. Organi-
zations strive to have employees that are competent to ensure a stable and safe work process. How-
ever, organizations tend to focus exclusively on the visible performance and not the cog ni tive,
conceptual, important beliefs, and other foundations that create the desired activity. Defin ing
competency too narrowly causes confusion and inconsistency between people hired to do the
same work.
Similarly, a definition limited to behavior criteria alone can create a shallow orientation and
framework for professional development.
This set of tools covers the visible and nonvisible domains of competence, because the com-
petent performer “feels responsible for, and thus emotionally involved in, the result of his
choice.”2 As such, the competency level is extremely important in establishing and achieving
specific accountabilities for results of processes rather than processes alone.
In other words, competent performance requires knowledge, skill, and energy that arise from an
honest belief in the work. We have all known people who have the “book knowledge” but don’t
apply it, or who “go through all the right motions” but don’t understand why those motions are
effective. A social worker may wait until a physician writes a discharge order before speaking with
the patient, demonstrating a correct response but not a proactive approach. A physician advisor
of case management may agree with a case manager about the inappropriateness of an admission
order for a patient, but might not actually discuss the issue with the admitting physician.
Knowledge, skill, and values have been defined by Bloom and other learning theorists as the
three domains in which a person can gain expertise.3 It is not possible to be fully competent in
case management unless a person is competent in all three domains:
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
x Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
• Knowledge or cognitive domain: The “knowledge structure” that includes comprehension,
application, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation
• Psychomotor or skill domain: Skill development that involves imitation, manipulation,
precision, articulation, and naturalization
• Effective or value and belief domain: The perception of value issues, starting with being
recep tive and responsive, then valuing, organizing, conceptualizing, and characterizing
by value
The Challenge of Evaluating Case Management Professionals
Because case management professionals work collaboratively but relatively (if not com pletely)
independently, they do not require or receive constant direct supervision. They have to create
networks and insert themselves within teams, nursing units, physician services, and between
departments. Their presence is frequently sought, but their work is not as observable as those in
direct care and, therefore, not as well understood. They help convert ambiguous situations into
decisions and interventions. They use many skills—and a lot of personal gumption—to create
access, reimbursement, a smooth clinical course, and accurate care transitions for an effective
recovery. Although their comprehensive work is difficult to define, it is definable and strategic
for each patient and family. Ultimately, case management professionals are held to the
measurable results related to their roles.
Case management has become a specialty within social work, nursing, and even the physicians’
world (in the role of physician advisor/director). Each person may also have different academic
preparation, a different career path, and a different orientation to case management functions.
In addition, each person may have a role that combines different functions, such as utilization
review (UR) and clinical documentation improvement. Because of the diverse functions involved
in different roles, there is no such entity as one case management competency list or tool.
Helping a new person develop from a beginner level to competence and even beyond may take
time and different approaches. Case management literature is now filled with employ ment
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. xi
interview and skill checklists. The specialty is also replete with certification exams that have
identified large areas of knowledge deemed necessary to practice in clinical settings. Checklists,
job descriptions, certifications, and other methods do not fully describe or explain levels of
competence and do not sequence learning experiences.
Pat Benner brought the idea of growing into competency, from a novice to an expert clinician,
to the nursing profession.4 Case management professionals experience the same staged growth,
and the stages can be used to guide growth proactively as well as measure/evaluate it.
Dreyfus and Dreyfus, two educators and scientists from Berkeley, CA, found that a “person
usually passes through at least five stages of qualitatively different perceptions of their tasks as
skill improves.”5 The former Competency Development Corporation6 created helpful terms and
descriptions for the first five stages and added Innovation and Discovery as a sixth stage. The
Center for Case Management merged the Benner, Dreyfus and Dreyfus, and Competency Develop -
ment Corporation’s frameworks for evaluating competency and defined competency for each
function within a hospital case management service. In 2004, a national advisory group reviewed
the new framework (included here) and defining characteristics for each level and function and
determined that they were accurate and comprehensive.
As the distinct case management functions defined in the following section become more clearly
articulated and performed during the next few years, evaluation of competency and levels
beyond should become even more straightforward. However, it will remain necessary to help
each individual track his or her growth from orientation through competency each time he or
she embarks on a new function or a new role.
Measuring Competency of Case Management Functions
There are many functions under the broad umbrella of case management. Case manage ment is a
department or service that is institutional-specific and individually operation alized. Roles may
include several functions, which can be defined as:
• Case management administrator/director: This person is responsible for the develop -
ment and operations of tools, roles, and systems; the case management administrator is
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
xii Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
accountable for meeting the targets on the case management dashboard collaboratively
developed with administration.
• Access/liaison function: The emphasis of access and liaison is on facilitating the entry of
patients into specific levels of care and access to community services. It can include liaison
screening, bed placement, registration, pre-authorization, and recertification. It might also
include booking and transportation. This function may be clerical and is often shared with
the business office.
• Emergency department registered nurse (RN) case manager: An RN that assists the
patient, emergency deparment (ED) staff, and hospital in determining the accurate level of
care between observation and inpatient, discharge planning directly from the ED, and
developing and im plementing a case management plan for frequent patient visitors to the
ED. Methods include the use of criteria, negotiation, and creative problem solving.
• UR/utilization management RN: The emphasis of UR is on reviewing or auditing patients
using criteria that demonstrate medical necessity to achieve reimbursement for the services.
It also includes the specialty of denial management. The goals of UR/denial management
are on appropriateness of medical necessity with targets of length of stay, no avoidable days,
and, currently, accurate use of observation status. This function may also include auditing
quality indicators. Tools may be automated and include standardized criteria and avoidable-
day documentation. Methods include discussions with physicians, negotiations with payers,
and referrals to a physician advisor.
• Care coordination: The emphasis of care coordination is on positive partnerships with
nursing, physicians, and other key disciplines in order to pace the care toward outcomes
while meeting core measures within the appropriate level of care. Targets of the care
coordination function are lower cost per case via lower resource utilization and strategic
clinical interventions. Tools include clinical paths, treatment plans, and order sets. Methods
include care coordination rounds and complex care rounds.
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. xiii
• Discharge/transition planning: Discharge planning is a legally mandated function in clud-
ing collaboratively determining level of care needs beyond acute care, providing de cision
support to patients, families, and physicians, managing patient and family expec tations,
and ensuring a smooth transition to the next level of care and services. Discharge planning
is nonlinear; it is a complex, interwoven set of tasks and responsibilities that may be com-
pleted by one or more person from one or more profession.
• Case manager with integrated functions: An RN who has three main daily functions to
pro vide in a timely and integrated workflow: UR, care coordination, and determination of
Plan A and B for the next level of care.
• Disease management professional: Disease management consists of a group of coherent
inter ventions designed to prevent or manage one or more chronic conditions using a
systematic, multidisciplinary approach and potentially employing multiple treatment
modalities.7 Disease management interventions might be coordinated by any discipline in
healthcare. Tools include educational tools, the Internet, and diaries. Methods include
scheduled meetings, classes, appointments, and group support.
• Clinical social work: A master’s-prepared clinical social worker provides skilled inter ven-
tions for the support and/or resolution of patient and family crises, problem solving and
decisions, advocacy and facilitation necessitated by life-changing events (i.e., adoption,
guardianship, abuse, placement, bereavement), mediation of risk factors and coping with
disease or disability, and other psychosocial and/or socioeconomic issues. The role may
include other functions, such as discharge planning, although this should not be the core of
the clinical social worker’s functions.
• Clinical documentation improvement specialist: An RN that specializes in detailed
medical record review, usually concurrently to the patient’s hospital stay, to ensure that the
physician documentation accurately reflects the patient’s entire condition, comorbidities,
and complica tions before submission to payers. Methods include auditing, querying,
educating, and analysis.
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
xiv Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
• Physician advisor: A physician specifically appointed to the responsibilities of advising the
case management department and the administration on the needs and practices of physi-
cians, and advising physicians on the criteria and regulations to which the organization
must comply and/or cooperate. The physician advisor, also titled the medical director of
case management, is the link between the case management department, the medical staff,
the vice president of medical affairs, and the hospital for matters related to physician
practice and behaviors as they affect cost and quality outcomes.
How to Measure Competency by Level
This toolkit acknowledges the uniqueness of each person and their interest in developing mastery
in case management, the variety of responsibilities within models within which professionals
work, and the standardization of a pathway to growth. The goal is not that every individual
reach the “innovation and discovery” level in all or even some of the domains. In fact, innova-
tion and discovery may never be reached. Rather, the overarching goal for evaluating competency
using these tools is that most professionals will be able to feel and enact the pleasure and auto-
nomy of conducting a practice (rather than performing a job) and should also be able to teach
others. In other words, that each person using these tools can attain the proficiency level if desired.
• Introduction: A relatively passive and dependent state, like a sponge that takes in infor-
mation but needs to learn the basic conceptual/factual structures and principles to be
able to function.
• Familiarization: A trial-and-error period as one practices and tries on new learning
experiences; a relatively unstable state necessary to the formation (according to Benner) of
paradigms, perspective, and active participation.
• Competence: A relatively stable state in which the learner is safe and can be effective.
Actions can be independently fulfilled and are within standards. Actions can be adapted for
noncomplex situations. Thought processes are internally consistent and often open to
external feedback.
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. xv
• Proficiency: An active and relatively comfortable state in which there is ease at carrying
out tasks in both simple and complex situations; communication and problem solving are
the norm; the person begins to teach and/or manage the behavior of others. This state is
epitomized by commitment.
• Excellence: A highly effective state in which the learner can move cross-culturally, trans-
lating standard and goal and commonalities from one profession or culture to another; the
person is an acknowledged leader and teacher, contributing to theory testing and development.
• Innovation/discovery: An extremely productive state in which ideas are constantly gener-
ated, negotiated, stimulated, and repeatedly tested in reality. The person can work with
projects and people and systems, sorting out multiple variables. Creativity is paramount.
How to Use This Tool for Self- or Employee Evaluation
1. Identify from the list below the function or functions that the case management profes-
sional is fulfilling on a daily or at least weekly basis. There may be some overlap between
functions, and there may also be some combined functions.
2. Read each statement carefully for each level. Realize whether you are reading descriptions
for the knowledge (cognitive), skill (psychomotor), or value/belief domain.
3. Check all the statements that describe the person’s demonstrated knowledge, skill, and value.
4. Do not be concerned if an experienced person does not cluster around the proficiency level
or in all three domains of proficiency. In fact, any difference between levels helps define
how the employee can improve, be more consistent, and/or be more credible.
5. The descriptors that are underlined hold more weight (importance) than the others in the
same level and domain. These weights can be organizationally defined, but, once defined,
should not be used with different importance between individuals in the role.
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
xvi Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
6. When measuring any domain, keep in mind that responsibility is the act of completing
tasks versus accountability, which is the acceptance of responsibility of one’s own actions
and those of others. Therefore, accountability is a higher order of professional development
than responsibility.
7. In analyzing the findings, if the three domains are very diverse, you have a person who
is not really comfortable in the current role. If the three domains are different by one
level, you should focus on bringing the levels that are not at the highest level up to match
each other.
How to Use This Tool During Performance Evaluations
1. Fill in the top portion of the evaluation, including the employee’s name, the evaluator’s
name, the date of evaluation, and the type of meeting (performance or goal-setting).
2. If there is no specific tool that fully describes a role, use the blank template that is
included to merge criteria from the other tools or create your own.
3. Put a checkmark next to the statements that best fit the person in each of the three do-
mains. The verbs in bold, capital letters help define the behaviors expected at each level in
each domain; more specific behaviors related to the function are then listed. Underlined
items are suggested to be the central theme of that function for the intersection between
the domain and the level.
4. If you evaluate the three domains at the same level, the person is really ready to grow to the
next level.
5. If you evaluate the three domains at different levels, the person may not be comfortable in
his or her current role.
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. xvii
6. If the three domains are different by one level, the evaluator should always focus on ways
to help the employee bring the lower levels up to match the higher ones.
Follow these recommendations for counseling for professional growth and development by
helping the person being evaluated advance to the next level:
• To advance from intro to familiarization: Help the individual avoid looking and feeling
stupid, inept, or lost. Provide structured guidance by a preceptor who understands teaching/
learning principles and can explain how to solve problems.
• To advance from familiarization to competence: Provide the individual with regular
feedback and opportunities to practice.
• To advance from competence to proficiency: Allow time for the individual to get more
experience and encourage him or her to view his or her role as a professional practice rather
than a job. Expect the individual to participate with peers and multidisci plinary, community,
political, and administrative colleagues individually and in group oppor tunities with the
goal of sharing experiences, peer consultation, and continuous quality improvement.
• To advance from proficiency to excellence: Promote the individual’s ability to concept ual-
ize and test his or her own values; focus on deep learning and exposure to cross-discipline
and cross-cultural experiences.
• To advance from excellence to innovation/discovery: Recognize and reward the indi-
vidual’s personal and professional autonomy. Focus on questions, paradoxes, and cog ni -
tive dissonance.
Competency Evaluation Tools: Guidelines for Use
xviii Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
Functions of Case Managers in Hospitals
References
1. K. Zander, Hospital Case Management Models: Evidence Connecting the Boardroom to the Bedside (Marblehead, MA: HCPro, 2008).
2. H. Dreyfus; S. Dreyfus, “The Relationship of Theory and Practice in the Acquisition of Skill,” in P. Benner, C. Tanner, and D. Chesla‘s Expertise in Nursing Practice (New York: Springer, 1996), p. 40.
3. B.S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Education Objectives: The Classifi cation of Educational Goals: Handbook I, Cognitive Domain, (New York: Longmans, Green, 1956), and J.S. Atherton, Learning and Teaching: Bloom’s Taxonomy (online), available at www.dmu.ac.uk/-jamesa/learning/bloomtax.
4. P. Benner, From Novice to Expert: Excellence and Power in Clinical Nursing Practice, (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2006).
5. Dreyfus and Dreyfus, op cit.
6. J. Ingalls, Competency Model for Competency Development Corporation, (Arlington, MA, 1984).
7. G. Schrijvers, “Disease Management: A Proposal for a New Defi nition,” International Journal of Integrated Care 9 (6) (2009). Retrieved from www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov, June 15, 2009.
Utilization review/management
Care coordinationAccess/emergencydepartment
Recovery anddisease management
Discharge/transitionplanning
Chapter 1
Case Management Administrator/Director
Competency Evaluation Tool
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. 3
Chapter 1
Case Management Administrator/Director
Competency Evaluation Tool
The case management administrator/director is responsible for the development and
operations of tools, roles, and systems that comprise a case management service. The case
management administrator is accountable for meeting the targets for case management that
are collaboratively developed with administration.
Case Management Administrator/Director Competency Evaluation Tool
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. 5
Employee:Evaluator:Type of review:Date:
Levels of Competency: Case Management Administrator/Director
Note: The following descriptors constitute a core of competency. Many more may be added to customize to the organization.
4 Cognitive knowledge 4 Psychomotor skill 4 Values/beliefsIntroductory(learning; focus-ing on “me” and the task)
q
Defines, describes
1. Discusses current, target, and benchmark goals for the department reflected in the organization’s multivariate display (i.e., value compass, data dashboard, balanced scorecard) and has a vision for achievement
q
Perception
1. Meets with each staff person reporting to him or her as well as the physi cian advisor to establish a working relationship
q
Receives, listens
1. Reviews the job descrip -tion, HR policies, utiliza- tion review plan, and other case management–related documents and discusses expectations with his or her supervisor
q 2. Describes the role of the case manager and the case management administrator in his or her own words
q 2. Interacts with key per - sonnel in the business office, admitting, medical records, education, nurs- ing, physicians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, speech and language pathologists, respiratory therapist, and HR concerning mutual responsibilities to begin to develop an internal network
q 2. Enjoys and engages with clinical settings and issues and working with multidisciplinary groups
q 3. Reviews the organiza-tion’s information systems, data sources, data types, and data analysis processes
q 3. Clearly articulates the purpose and direction of the case management department to the case management staff and to the entire organization to foster cooperation and feedback
q 3. Treats each patient’s history and current condition with confidenti-ality and respect
Chapter 1
6 Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
4 Cognitive knowledge 4 Psychomotor skill 4 Values/beliefsq 4. Describes the job
description and expecta-tions of all persons who are direct reports
q 4. Schedules frequent staff meetings to listen to the staff’s needs and to develop the group’s cohesiveness
q 5. Reviews the revenue cycle
Familiarization(rehearsing; focusing on the staff’s deliverables)
q
Comprehends
1. Identifies the strengths and weaknesses of each staff member and establishes a plan for how to make improvements
q
Guided response
1. Reviews and explains the operational budget
q
Responds
1. Participates in a contin- uous evaluation of his or her own learning needs
q 2. Describes how the case management department uniquely fits into the organization and its relationship with external resources, risks, goals, and expectations
q 2. Meets with key personnel from the postacute continuum to discuss mutual goals
q 2. Remains open, receptive, and positive to the range of politics and personali-ties that interface with the department
q 3. Identifies the strengths and weaknesses of the department as a whole
q 3. Meets with key personnel from the payer commu-nity to discuss mutual goals and guidelines
q 3. Respects diverse perspectives in order to promote creative problem solving
q 4. Identifies at-risk popula- tions and strategies to decrease the risk
q 4. Integrates management approaches with iden ti- fied gaps between cur- rent operations and anticipated targets
q 4. Communicates team-work, caring, and compassion
q 5. Envisions the interdepen-dencies of clinical and data systems within the organization
q 5. Is constantly a standard bearer and a role model
q 6. Contributes to the organization’s under-standing and success with the revenue cycle
Case Management Administrator/Director Competency Evaluation Tool
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. 7
4 Cognitive knowledge 4 Psychomotor skill 4 Values/beliefsCompetence(doing; meeting targets; focusing on collaborative partnerships)
q
Conceptualize
1. Sorts through multiple inputs and feedback to generate an ongoing development plan for the department
q
Effectively and indepen-dently carries out tasks
1. Presents the executive team with ongoing, reli - able information about the treatment and flow of patients throughout all levels of care from access through the 30-day recovery period
q
Demonstrates commitment
1. Collaborates with all disciplines and depart-ments to optimize key clinical and financial outcomes within best-practice, ethical, legal, and regulatory parameters
q 2. Explains processes to use when physicians, systems, data, and other operations do not meet expectations
q 2. Negotiates and seeks approval of the opera-tional budget
q 2. Adheres to the American Case Management Association’s Standards of Practice for Hospital and Health System Case Management:
• Collaboration
• Communication
• Facilitation
• Coordination
• Advocacy
• Resource management
• Accountability
q 3. Describes strengths and inherent limitations of data, research, trends, and benchmarks
q 3. Selects and uses intensity of service and other tools effectively
q 3. Effectively communicates the value of case manage-ment activities within the organization and com - munity to obtain synergy, cooperation, and collabor- ative partnerships
q 4. Consistently applies critical thinking to all planning
q 4. Develops, writes, imple - ments, and evaluates the strategic plan for the organizationwide case management process
q 4. Values employee engage - ment and satisfaction with work responsibilities and the work environment
Chapter 1
8 Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
4 Cognitive knowledge 4 Psychomotor skill 4 Values/beliefsq 5. Attends conferences and
other forums to continu-ously keep up to date on local, regional, and national trends related to case management
q 5. Creates a system for the ongoing education and development of the staff as a group and individually
q 5. Embraces change that is believed necessary to improve efficiency and/or effectiveness
q 6. Follows standard HR procedures and uses their consultation as necessary to avoid crises
q 6. Takes care of him- or herself in order to take care of others when on the job
q 7. Establishes a partnership with the vice president of medical affairs, physi- cian advisor, and other medical associates
q 7. Consistently resolves conflicts between meeting patient’s needs and the needs of the department or the individuals within it
q 8. Constructs or adapts a data dashboard
q 9. Establishes, manages, and constantly evaluates departmental policies and procedures, department goals, and staffing levels/workload assignments
q 10. Reviews and follows regulations governing the practice of the departments
q 11. Monitors staff satisfac-tion and engagement in the goals and improve-ments of the department and the organization
q 12. Establishes a robust mechanism for denial pre- vention and management
Case Management Administrator/Director Competency Evaluation Tool
Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition © 2009 HCPro, Inc. 9
4 Cognitive knowledge 4 Psychomotor skill 4 Values/beliefsProficiency(mastery of com-plexity; precept-ing; focusing on others)
q
Analyses
1. Formulates effective approaches to creating necessary and sustain-able change
q
Complex, overt actions
1. Works through ambigu-ous situations in order to clarify direction and successfully manage change
q
Evaluates
1. Maintains principles of care and case manage - ment during periods of high stress and difficult challenges
q 2. Acknowledges and analyzes formal and informal assessments of the local healthcare market and their impact on the organization
q 2. Provides decision support as needed by the executive team
q 2. Assists employees to find inner strength and empower behavioral excellence
q 3. Identifies resources required to achieve goals if current resources are insufficient
q 3. Constantly monitors the effectiveness of tools, roles, and systems
q 3. Develops a network of case management colleagues at the local, regional, and state level to remain aware of ongoing regulatory and legislative changes
q 4. Obtains certification as a case management administrator or other national case manage-ment certification
q 4. Reconstructs the data dashboard as priorities change
q 4. Always takes a proactive approach to avoid crises
q 5. Conducts formal groups in rapid-cycle and performance- improvement activities
q 5. Develops a network of case management colleagues outside the organization for ongoing resources and support
q 6. Provides oversight of compliance with regulations, laws, and ethics via audits and other mechanisms
q 7. Establishes and manages programs and projects that focus upon staff and departmental growth
Chapter 1
10 Competency Evaluation Tools for Case Management Professionals, Second Edition© 2009 HCPro, Inc.
4 Cognitive knowledge 4 Psychomotor skill 4 Values/beliefsq 8. Integrates additional re-
sources to achieve goals
q 9. Attains high satisfaction and retention levels of valuable staff members
Excellence(leading; focus-ing on the larger system)
q
Synthesizes
1. Evaluates the applicabil-ity of current healthcare trends to the organization and system
q
Adapts
1. Adapts the strategic plan as important new risks and needs are understood
q
Reorganizes usefully
1. Brings energy and leader- ship to the reorganization of structures, policies, practices, etc., to better meet margin and mission goals of the larger system
q 2. Collaboratively deter-mines a potential response to new trends
q 2. Debates with fellow administrators using conviction and respect
q 2. Participates in local, re- gional, state, or national committees to advocate or fight against proposed regulatory changes
q 3. Can weigh alternatives and articulate them
q 3. Constructively questions new health policies and practices
Innovation/discovery(creating; focus- ing on the greater good and greater functionality)
q
Experiments, researches
1. Incorporates and integrates related theories, evidence, practice standards, and other established knowledge into new methods and models of case management
q
Invents, creates
1. Connects overtly disparate realities in a new way that solves a problem encountered at the patient, organization, or community level
q
Leads, value maturity
1. Embraces multivariate realities and uses them to motivate and empower him- or herself and others to create something new
q 2. Makes sound hypotheses and conducts formal research in some aspect of case management
q 2. Designs systems to aid in achieving goals
q 2. Inspires individuals and groups to develop im- proved systems for care delivery and management across time and place
Source: The Center for Case Management.
Name
Title
Organization
Street Address
City State ZIP
Telephone Fax
E-mail Address
Order your copy today!
Title Price Order Code Quantity Total
$
Shipping* $ (see information below)
Sales Tax** $ (see information below)
Grand Total $
*Shipping InformationPlease include applicable shipping. For books under $100, add $10. For books over $100, add $18. For shipping to AK, HI, or PR, add $21.95.
**Tax InformationPlease include applicable sales tax. States that tax products and shipping and handling: CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV.
State that taxes products only: AZ.
BIllInG OPTIOnS:
Bill me Check enclosed (payable to HCPro, Inc.) Bill my facility with PO # ________________
Bill my (3 one): VISA MasterCard AmEx Discover
Signature Account No. Exp. Date
(Required for authorization) (Your credit card bill will reflect a charge from HCPro, Inc.)
© 2008 HCPro, Inc. HCPro, Inc. is not affiliated in any way with The Joint Commission, which owns the JCAHO and Joint Commission trademarks. Code: EBKPDF
Order online at www.hcmarketplace.com Or if you prefer: MAIl ThE COMPlETEd OrdEr fOrM TO: HCPro, Inc. P.O. Box 1168, Marblehead, MA 01945
CAll Our CuSTOMEr SErvICE dEPArTMEnT AT: 800/650-6787
fAx ThE COMPlETEd OrdEr fOrM TO: 800/639-8511
E-MAIl: [email protected]
P.O. Box 1168 | Marblehead, MA 01945 | 800/650-6787 | www.hcmarketplace.com
Please fill in the title, price, order code and quantity, and add applicable shipping
and tax. for price and order code, please visit www.hcmarketplace.com. If you
received a special offer or discount source code, please enter it below.
Your order is fully covered by a 30-day, money-back guarantee.
Enter your special Source Code here: