Discrimination, Discrimination, Prejudice and Prejudice and Stereotype
Second-Degree Price Discrimination with declining AC
description
Transcript of Second-Degree Price Discrimination with declining AC
Second-Degree Price Discrimination with declining AC
Quantity
$/Q
D
MR
MC
AC
P0
Q0
Without discrimination: P = P0 and Q = Q0. With second-degree
discrimination there are threeprices P1, P2, and P3.
(e.g. electric utilities), not P4
P1
Q1
1st Block
P2
Q2
P3
Q3
2nd Block 3rd Block
Second-degree pricediscrimination is pricing
according to quantityconsumed--or in blocks.
With blocks (P1, Q1), (P2,Q2), (P3,Q3), deadweight loss becomes zero
P4
P
A
B
C
D
E
Q4
4th Block
F
G
H
Note at P2,P3 blocks, prices charged are uniform; hence no question of falling MR; So, problem of MR<MC doesn’t arise.
Consumer surplus is sum of triangles PAP1, ACF, CDG (not DHE)
Second-Degree Price Discrimination with U-shaped AC
$/Q
Q
AC
MC
ARMR
P1
P2
P3P4P5
P
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5
A1
A2A3
A4A5
B2
B3B4
B5
Profit-maximizing combination= (P2,Q2), if uniform price is charged
In case of second-degree pricediscrimination, price-block combinations (P1,Q1), (P2,Q2),(P3,Q3), (P4,Q4) are possible w/oDWL. But if combinations stop at (P3,Q3), then there will be some DWL. Combination (P5,Q5) not feasible as MC>P5.