Sec. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint Gillespie v 13th Circuit 5.10-cv-00503 WTH TBS

8/9/2019 Sec. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint Gillespie v 13th Circuit 5.10-cv-00503 WTH TBS

1/40

Case 5:10-cv-00503-WTH-DAB Document 1 Filed 09/28/10 Page 1 of 39

Note: See the last page, District Clerk Sheryl Loesch Refusedo "scan and file" Exhibits 1-15 to Complaint (Doc. 1).

Clerk Loesch did not respond to my letter about the matter.


2/40



3/40



4/40



5/40



6/40



7/40



8/40



9/40



10/40



11/40



12/40



13/40



14/40



15/40



16/40



17/40



18/40



19/40



20/40



21/40



22/40



23/40



24/40



25/40



26/40



27/40



28/40



29/40



30/40



31/40



32/40



33/40



34/40



35/40



36/40



37/40



38/40



39/40



40/40

District Clerk Refused to scan and file Exhibits 1-15 to Complaint (Doc. 1)Gillespie v Thirteenth Judicial Circuit 5: I0-cv-00503-WTH-TBS

Doc. 2 - 09-28-10, Exhibits I through 15 and ADA Assessment & Report re I Complaint

Note: The District Clerk refused to put any of the exhibits 1-15 shown below on the CaseManagement/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system in violation of the Court's AdministrativeProcedures Order, No. 6:07-MC-0027-0RL-19, by Chief Judge Patricia C. Fawsett, signed February28, 2007. The Court's CM/ECF Order requires pro se to file in paper format unless authorized to fileelectronically, but provides no information on how to obtain authorization.

III(C) PRO SE FILER: Unless authorized to file electronically, a pro se filer shall file anypleading and other paper in paper format. The Clerk will scan and file these paperselectronically and will also maintain a paper file of such documents. If authorized by theassigned Judge, a party proceeding pro se may file electronically. If authorized to fileelectronically, the pro se filer must follow these procedures.

Plaintiff s Motion to File Electronically (Doc. 6) was denied (Doc. 17). See Consolidated Notice o fPro Se Electronic Case Filing Prohibition by District Court, which appears at Exhibit 4 to Motion toApply Funds Toward Filing Fees (Doc. 70). See my letter to Sheryl Loesch April 15, 2012 whichappears at Exhibit 8 to Consolidated Notice o f Pro Se Electronic Case Filing Prohibit ion y DistrictCourt.(Doc. 70, Exhibit 4). No response yet from District Clerk Loesch.

• LIST OF EXHIBITS TO THE COMPLAINT (Doc. I) 5:IO-cv-00503-WTH-(DAB)-TBS

Exhibit I Complaint for Breach of Contract, Fraud, 05-CA-007205, Aug-I 1-2005

Exhibit 2 Answer, Affirmative Defense, Counterclaim, 05-CA-007205, Feb-19-2005

Exhibit 3 Plaintiff s First Amended Complaint, and Motion, 05-CA-007205, May-05-20 I0

Exhibit 4 Emergency Motion to Disqualify Defendants' Counsel RCR BRC

Exhibit 5 DOIwrestling.com - Declaration of Independents, Rodems comments

Exhibit 6 PROFESSIONALISM AND LITIGATION ETHICS, 28 Stetson L. Rev. 323

Exhibit 7 Plaintiffs Accommodation Request, ADA, February 20, 2007

Exhibit 8 Plaintiffs Amended Accommodation Request, ADA, March 5, 2007

Exhibit 9 Robert W. Bauer letter, July 24, 2008

Exhibit 10 Notice of Filing, Affidavit ofNJG, Bauer's email, don't attend hearings

Exhibit II July 9, 2010 ADA letter from David A. Rowland

Exhibit 12 Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, September 27,2010, Judge Cook falsified Rodems disqualiforder

Exhibit 13 Affidavit of Neil J. Gillespie, September 27, 2010, Judge Cook falsified ADA

Exhibit 14 Judge Cook's Res Judicata Motions

l l d l

Sec. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint Gillespie v 13th Circuit 5.10-cv-00503 WTH TBS

Documents

Transcript of Sec. 1983 Civil Rights Complaint Gillespie v 13th Circuit 5.10-cv-00503 WTH TBS