TRANSATLANTIC TUNNEL (FLOATING TUNNEL) STRUCTURAL DESIGN DEPARTMENT, CEPT UNIVERSITY, AHMEDABAD.
Seattle’s Problem: Replacing the Viaducts3images.coroflot.com/user_files/individual_files/... ·...
Transcript of Seattle’s Problem: Replacing the Viaducts3images.coroflot.com/user_files/individual_files/... ·...
Seattle’s Problem: Replacing the Viaduct
As we all know, the Viaduct must eventually be torn down.
There have been three proposals to deal with
this problem
• Build a new Viaduct• Build a tunnel• Replace the Viaduct with a surface road
Two of these methods are very costly.
• Costly Construction by 2009– Viaduct replacement: $3.0 Billion– Tunnel-Bulkhead: $4.9 Billion
• Costly Disruption– Waterfront commerce shut down
And the surface road option?
• doesn’t make any sense for traffic flow
• doesn’t make any sense for commerce
We submit that there is another way to replace the
Viaduct
The benefits of this method include
• Affordable Construction: $3.8 Billion*
• Very little downtown disruption
• Arterial flow maintained throughout the project
• No land acquisition required
*Based on current FST modular type construction methods from 1993 European source data. Data extrapolated to present day Washington State costs.
Engineering criteria, and technology have
been developed
• There are several ongoing engineering projects, and there are construction projects using this technology.
A proposal
We propose that the FHWA, WSDOT, and the City of Seattle, jointly fund an engineering
and cost feasibility study based on the following concept.
The ELLIOT BAY
SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
Like a floating bridge
The ELLIOT BAYSUBMERGED
FLOATING TUNNEL (EBSFT) is
anchored to the bottom.
Unlike a floating bridge
EBSFT is protected from storms
Like a tunnel
EBSFT uses traditional tunnel ventilation methods
South entranceventilation and
service structure
Unlike a tunnel
EBSFT requires minimal digging and commercial disruption.
Like a traditional suspension bridge
EBSFT issuspended.(off of the bottom)
Unlike a traditional suspension bridge
EBSFT is in an environment
where loads are substantially
less than bridges.
In this example we propose building the EBSFT using plastic composite methods
• Not like modular construction STF approach used to date.
• Flexible mono-structure– eliminates joints under water– can be towed into place– flexible enough to handle underwater and seismic
stresses – recycled flotation and ballast components can be
used
Step1
• Build a facility on the northern tip of Harbor Island
Step 2
• Weave cables, or other appropriate materials to create flexible tube tunnel structures.
• These tunnel structures are coated and covered with a flexible composite.
Step 3
• Install deck beams. These beams act as foundation for the road beds.
Step 4
• Add additional structural components• Build a composite filler with integral structural
flotation and ballast. (This filler connects the tunnels)
Step 5
• As EBSFT is constructed, it is flooded and towed into place with tugs.
Step 6
• EBSFT is anchored to the bottom and supplied with enough positive buoyancy to support the weight of traffic
EBSFT cross section
South boundBallast tanks,bilges and pumps
Service and ventilation
Bilges
Integral composite flotationNorth bound
Integral composite ballast
More Commerce
Other submerged floating tunnels could be produced at the Harbor
Island facility, and be towed to site.
EBSFT Placement Options
EBSFT starts at Harbor Island
It could startat other
locations too
Recap
• The benefits of Submerged Floating Tunnel Technology in Seattle– Affordable– Very little downtown disruption– Arterial flow maintained – No land acquisition required– New industry for the region
• The technology is ready and waiting
We Request that the FHWA, WSDOT, and
the City of Seattle
jointly fund an engineering and cost feasibility study for the
ELLIOT BAY SUBMERGED FLOATING TUNNEL
Source Documents
• http://www.fehrl.org/?m=32&id_directory=58– including: Forum of European National Highway Research
Laboratories Analysis of the submerged floating tunnel concept, Transport Research Laboratory Crowthorne, Berkshire, RG45 6AU, 1996 p10
• http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/BIZ/CONSTRUCTION/CostIndex/CostIndexPd f/constructioncosts.pdf
• http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/transportation/285955_viaduct21.html• http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/frp/frp1298.cfm• http://www.jeico.co.kr/cnc57ec1.html• http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/Projects/SR520Bridge/Photos/Damage.htm• http://testcf.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/sr16narrowsbridge/photolibrary/19
40/enlarged/?image=1940_2.jpg&description=desc2.htm• http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bigdig.htm
EBSFT
Sometimes ideas just need to get out there!
Art & Invention focuses on creative consultancy and mechanical product development.Contact: Mark Adams, [email protected]
P.O. Box 11278 Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
EBSFT
THANK YOU