Seasonal variation in elemental composition of certain seaweeds...
Transcript of Seasonal variation in elemental composition of certain seaweeds...
Available online at www.worldscientificnews.com
( Received 02 May 2019; Accepted 20 May 2019; Date of Publication 21 May 2019 )
WSN 129 (2019) 147-160 EISSN 2392-2192
Seasonal variation in elemental composition of certain seaweeds from Mandapam and Kilakarai
coast, Gulf of Mannar biosphere reserve
Muthukumarasamy Thillaivasan, Kaliyamoorthy Kumar
and Kathiresan Silvakumar*
Division of Algal Biotechnology, Department of Botany, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar – 608 002, Tamil Nadu, India
*E-mail address: [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Vegetative plants of certain seaweeds were collected from the natural habitat of Kilakarai and
Mandapam coast were subjected to SEM-energy dispersive spectroscopic analysis and quantified the
following minerals viz., Na, Mg, Si, S, Cl, K, Ca, Mn, P, Fe, Zn and Cr during summer, pre-monsoon,
monsoon and post-monsoon seasons in 2007-2008. The order of preferential accumulation of elemental
composition during summer 2007 in Sargassum wightii: Ca > Mg > Na > S > Fe > Si > Cl > K > Mn;
Stoechospermum marginatum: Ca > Si > S > Mg > Mn > P > Na; Gracilaria corticata: Ca > Mg > Na > Si
> Cl > S > Mn > K > Fe > P; Gracilaria verrucosa: Ca > Cl > Si > Mg > Na > P > S > Mn > Fe > K and
Grateloupia filicinia: Ca > Cl > P > Si > Na > Cr > K. Seasonal distribution of elemental composition in
the seaweeds showed that most of the minerals were high during the summer followed post-monsoon
and monsoon seasons. This could perhaps be due to an ambient concentration of these minerals was
high during these seasons thereby facilitating their uptake by seaweeds.
Keywords: Seaweeds, SEM-EDS, Summer, Pre-monsoon, monsoon, Post monsoon, Gulf of Mannar,
Sargassum wightii, Stoechospermum marginatum, Gracilaria corticata, Gracilaria verrucosa,
Grateloupia filicinia
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-148-
1. INTRODUCTION
Seaweed is one of the most important vegetable sources of calcium. They have rich source
of minerals, especially macro and micronutrients necessary for human nutrition, however the
nutritional properties of seaweeds are usually determined from their bio-chemical composition
viz., protein, carbohydrates, vitamins and amino acids etc. [1, 2]. Seaweeds are used as regular
components of diet and have been consume regularly by the coastal people. Significant amount
of seaweeds are harvested world wide for the production of phycocolloids. It is only source for
the production of phycocolloids. In the present study on attempt has been made on the seaweeds
namely Sargassum wightii (Greville Mscr.) J.G. Agardh, Stoechospermum marginatum (C.
Ag.) Kuetz., Gracilaria corticata var. Cylindrica J. Ag., Gracilaria verrucosa (Huds.) Papenfus
and Grateloupia filicinia (J.V. Lamouroux) C. Agardh. They grow abundantly along the coast of
Mandapam and Kilakarai. Seasonal changes in elemental composition for a period of one year
between January 2018 to December 2018. Physico-chemical characteristics of seawater
samples collected in different seasons were also recorded. Further, the seaweeds were subjected
to EDS and the results of these studies are presented in this paper.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
Samples of Sargassum wightii (Greville Mscr.) J.G. Agardh, Stoechospermum
marginatum (C. Ag.) Kuetz., Gracilaria corticata var. Cylindrica J. Ag., Gracilaria verrucosa
(Huds.) Paperfus and Grateloupia filicinia (J.V. Lamouroux) C. Agardh (Plate 1) were
collected from the natural habitat in the intertidal area of Gulf of Mannar Biosphere (Fig. 1).
The collection was made during the morning low tide. They were transported to the laboratory
in plastic packets, brushed off the epiphytes and washed several times in filtered seawater
followed by distilled water. These five alga species of 2-3 mm were fixed in 3% glutaradehyde
for scanning electron microscopic studies. Then they were dehydrated through a graded series
of acetone with 12-15 m interval at 4 C up to 70%. They were further dehydrated in 90% and
100‰ of acetone and kept at room temperature for 2-3 h. Finally the dehydrated samples treated
with critical point drier (CPD). Then they were mounted on a stub and the specimens were
coated [3]. They were examined with JOEL JSM-56010 LV with INSA-EDS and
photomicrographs were taken selectively from computer screen at central sophisticated
Instrumentation Laboratory, Department of Physics, Annamalai University, Annamalainagar,
Tamil Nadu, India. Physico-chemical parameters of seawaters were collected for the estimation
of temperature, salinity, pH and DO using water and soil analysis kit model 1160-E.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Physico-chemical parameter such as atmospheric temperature, surface water temperature,
salinity, pH, DO are presented in Tables 1 to 4.
The seasonal variation in surface water temperature and air temperature invariably
showed high values during pre-monsoon and low in post monsoon. The air temperature varied
from 33.6 to 36.0 C. The surface water temperature varied from 33.1 to 34 C. The salinity of
seawater shows high during summer and low in monsoon period.
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-149-
Table 1. Correlation matrix between different physico-chemical parameters of seawater
samples during post monsoon (January-March, 2018).
Air
temperature
(C)
Surface water
temperature
(C)
Salinity
(‰) pH
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm)
Air
temperature
(C)
1.000**
Surface water
temperature
(C)
1.000** 1.000**
Salinity (‰) 0.800* -0.500* 1.000**
pH 1.000** 1.000** -0.500* 1.000**
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm) 0.500* 0.500* -1.000** 0.500* 1.000**
* Significant at 5% level
**Significant at 1% level
Table 2. Correlation matrix between different physico-chemical parameters of seawater
samples during summer (April-June, 2018).
Air
temperature
(C)
Surface water
temperature
(C)
Salinity
(‰) pH
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm)
Air
temperature
(C)
1.000**
Surface water
temperature
(C)
-1.000** 1.000**
Salinity (‰) 0.500* 0.500* 1.000**
pH 1.000** -1.000** -0.500* 1.000**
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm) -1.000** -1.000** -0.500* 1.000** 1.000**
* Significant at 5% level
**Significant at 1% level
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-150-
Table 3. Correlation matrix between different physico-chemical parameters of seawater
samples during pre monsoon (July-September, 2018).
Air
temperature
(C)
Surface water
temperature
(C)
Salinity
(‰) pH
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm)
Air
temperature
(C)
1.000**
Surface water
temperature
(C)
0.970* 1.000**
Salinity (‰) -0.866* 1.000** 1.000**
pH 1.000** 0.866* 0.866* 1.000**
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm) 1.000** 0.866* 0.866* 1.000** 1.000**
* Significant at 5% level
**Significant at 1% level
Table 4. Correlation matrix between different physico-chemical parameters of seawater
samples during monsoon (October-December, 2018).
Air
temperature
(C)
Surface water
temperature
(C)
Salinity
(‰) pH
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm)
Air
temperature
(C)
1.000**
Surface water
temperature
(C)
0.866* 1.000**
Salinity (‰) -0.600** -0.500* 1.000**
pH 1.000** 0.866* 0.000 1.000**
Dissolved
oxygen (ppm) -0.600* 0.866* 0.000 1.000** 1.000**
* Significant at 5% level
**Significant at 1% level
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-151-
The salinity varied from 33 to 34.2‰. The pH of seawater shows high during summer
and pre monsoon seasons. The pH seawater shows high during summer and pre monsoon
seasons. The pH varied from 7.1 to 7.5. The DO shows high value during post monsoon season.
The DO varied from 4.1 to 4.7 ppm. Analysis of the different elemental composition of the 5
seaweeds using SEM-EDS was carried during the different climatic conditions of the period
January 2018 post monsoon to December 2018 Monsoon. The experiment carried out for four
seasons i.e. summer, pre monsoon, post monsoon and monsoon. The result of the study showed
a distinct amount of each element.
Table 5. Elemental composition of seaweeds using SEM-EDS during post monsoon
(January-March, 2018).
Seaweeds
Minerals (wt %)
Na Mg Si S Cl K Ca Mn P Fe Zn Cr Total
S.
wig
hti
i
11
.14
0
.11
27
.96
0
.15
4.6
3
0
.09
4.1
0
0
.09
3.6
0
0
.07
2.4
4
0
.06
41
.38
0
.20
1.5
0
0
.07
-
3.2
2
0
.08
- -
99
.97
0
.18
S.
ma
rgin
atu
m
5.4
0
0
.14
12
.71
0
.10
19
.20
0
.08
11
.43
0
.13
- -
41
.70
0
.20
6.8
2
0
.08
2.7
3
0
.07
- - -
99
.99
0
.23
G.
cort
ica
ta
13
.36
0
.52
17
.25
0
.25
11
.66
0
.21
6.6
5
0
.14
10
.33
0
.10
1.7
1
0
.13
34
.01
0
.22
2.2
3
0
.07
1.1
6
0
.04
1.6
0
0
.17
- -
99
.96
0
.24
G.
verr
uco
sa
8.4
7
0
.11
15
.27
0
.19
14
.84
0
.16
5.4
3
0
.07
17
.42
0
.19
1.4
8
0
.06
25
.13
0
.20
3.8
1
0
.08
5.6
4
0
.12
2.4
7
0
.75
- -
99
.96
0
.12
G.
fili
cin
ia
7.9
4
0
.09
4.6
5
0
.07
11
.0
0
.09
-
20
.93
0
.14
3.6
7
0
.08
32
.85
0
.22
-
13
.05
0
.10
- -
5.8
8
0
.07
99
.97
0
.20
Values are expressed as the mean SD; n = 3
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-152-
Table 6. Elemental composition of seaweeds using SEM-EDS during summer
(April-June, 2018).
Seaweeds
Minerals (wt %)
Na Mg Si S Cl K Ca Mn P Fe Zn Cr Total
S.
wig
hti
i
9.0
6
0
.12
23
.13
0
.18
2.9
0
0
.09
3.7
1
0
.08
3.0
4
0
.08
-
33
.36
0
.19
-
3.9
2
0
.08
4.2
5
0
.11
4.8
3
0
.08
11
.77
0
.11
99
.97
0
.18
S.
ma
rgin
atu
m
2.2
0
0
.07
10
.02
0
.35
18
.79
0
.08
8.8
6
0
.11
3.0
5
0
.07
1.5
4
0
.06
31
.3
0
.29
4.8
1
0
.08
2.9
4
0
.07
1.8
6
0
.06
10
.90
0
.13
3.8
5
0
.07
99
.99
0
.23
G.
cort
ica
ta
10
.64
0
.11
13
.14
0
.15
10
.95
0
.18
8.9
3
0
.08
9.7
3
0
.09
1.7
3
0
.06
29
.10
0
.22
1.7
5
0
.07
1.9
3
0
.07
1.6
2
0
.06
4.0
6
0
.05
6.3
8
0
.06
99
.96
0
.24
G.
verr
uco
sa
6.2
4
0
.13
11
.40
0
.11
12
.42
0
.13
3.1
0
0
.04
16
.91
0
.14
1.9
0
0
.06
21
.89
0
.19
3.5
4
0
.04
4.9
3
0
.08
6.7
0
0
.14
5.0
7
0
.10
5.8
6
0
.11
99
.96
0
.12
G.
fili
cin
ia
5.9
2
0
.12
4.4
4
0
.15
9.7
1
0
.08
3.5
7
0
.05
19
.83
0
.19
-
27
.33
0
.22
6.1
0
0
.10
9.7
1
0
.08
5.6
0
0
.10
7.7
5
0
.08
-
99
.97
0
.20
Values are expressed as the mean SD; n = 3
The order of elements in different seaweeds as follows S. wightii, Ca > Mg > Cr > Na >
Zn > P > S > Fe > Cl > Si > K > Mn; S. marginatum, Ca > Si > Zn > Mg > S > Cr > Mn > Cl > P >
Na > Fe > K; G. corticata, Ca > Mg > Si > Na > Cl > S > Cr > Zn > Mn > Fe > K; G. verrucosa,
Ca > Cl > Mg > P > Cr > Zn > Na > Fe > P > Mn > S > K and G. filicinia, Ca > Cl > P > Si > Fe >
Cr > Zn > Na > Mg > K (Tables 5 to 8).
Seaweeds collected during post-monsoon season showed maximum contribution of
calcium. They were ranging between 23.92 0.30 to 39.54 0.37 total weight. Minimum values
were varied among species during monsoon period. In G. corticata least values were obtained
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-153-
for phosphorus (1.39 0.06), S. wightii, Mn (1.34 0.06), S. marginatum, Cr (1.61 0.07), G.
filicinia, S (2.08 0.10) and G. verrucosa, K (1.82 0.07) (Tables 5 to 8).
Table 7. Elemental composition of seaweeds using SEM-EDS during pre monsoon
(July-September, 2018).
Seaweeds
Minerals (wt %)
Na Mg Si S Cl K Ca Mn P Fe Zn Cr Total
S.
wig
hti
i
8.9
5
0
.11
22
.60
0
.17
2.5
2
0
.04
3.6
7
0
.08
2.8
2
0
.03
1.9
1
0
.06
33
.17
0.2
3
1.8
1
0
.06
3.9
9
0
.09
3.8
6
0
.08
4.5
2
0
.09
10
.13
0
.14
99
.95
0
.15
S.
ma
rgin
atu
m
2.1
4
0
.10
9.5
3
0
.08
17
.98
0
.13
8.6
6
0
.12
3.8
2
0
.07
1.3
9
0
.08
29
.26
0
.31
4.3
4
0
.08
2.6
4
0
.09
1.4
4
0
.06
12
.46
0
.11
6.3
1
0
.04
99
.97
0
.23
G.
cort
ica
ta
10
.47
0
.11
13
.08
0
.11
10
.90
0
.08
8.8
0
0
.09
9.0
6
0
.10
1.4
9
0
.05
28
.92
0
.20
2.5
3
0
.04
1.1
0
0
.04
1.6
0
0
.06
3.9
6
0
.07
8.0
6
0
.07
99
.97
0
.27
G.
verr
uco
sa
6.1
1
0
.13
11
.32
0
.13
10
.81
0
.09
2.9
3
0
.08
16
.41
0
.19
2.0
9
0
.05
21
.16
0
.17
4.5
0
0
.08
4.9
3
0
.07
5.1
5
0
.06
6.6
1
0
.08
7.9
4
0
.12
99
.96
0
.33
G.
fili
cin
ia
5.1
0
0
.11
3.8
7
0
.11
9.1
4
0
.12
2.6
2
0
.06
19
.36
0
.17
2.8
0
0
.09
25
.77
0
.23
1.3
0
0
.07
9.8
7
0
.12
8.9
7
0
.07
5.4
5
0
.11
5.7
1
0
.08
99
.96
0
.19
Values are expressed as the mean SD; n = 3
Two stations selected in the present study are located along the Tamil Nadu coast. The
atmospheric temperature fluctuations are suggested to be Ocean’s thermal inertia which
changes the lay between absorption and release of solar energy to the atmosphere [4].
Atmospheric temperature at Kilakarai and Mandapam station had positive correlation with
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-154-
surface water temperature, pH and salinity but negatively correlated with dissolved oxygen
(Tables 1 to 4).
Table 8. Elemental composition of seaweeds using SEM-EDS during monsoon
(October-December, 2018).
Seaweeds
Minerals (wt %)
Na Mg Si S Cl K Ca Mn P Fe Zn Cr Total
S.
wig
hti
i
10
.70
0
.14
26
.40
0
.32
3.1
5
0
.06
3.7
7
0
.11
3.0
4
0
.08
2.1
5
0
.06
38
.67
0
.06
1.3
4
0
.06
-
3.0
8
0
.11
4.7
3
0
.08
2.9
3
0
.09
99
.96
0
.24
S.
ma
rgin
atu
m
3.7
3
0
.08
11
.41
0
.14
18
.68
0
.16
11
.81
0
.13
3.2
0
0
.10
-
39
.54
0
.37
5.1
8
0
.12
2.5
9
0
.08
-
2.8
4
0
.06
1.6
1
0
.07
99
.96
0
.31
G.
cort
ica
ta
12
.36
0
.16
16
.70
0
.12
10
.76
0
.10
5.9
3
0
.09
9.8
6
0
.13
1.9
2
0
.07
30
.67
0
.29
1.9
6
0
.06
1.3
9
0
.06
1.8
5
0
.06
4.6
1
0
.07
1.9
5
0
.05
99
.96
0
.18
G.
verr
uco
sa
7.1
0
0
.08
13
.64
0
.05
13
.65
0
.11
4.7
5
0
.07
16
.03
0
.14
1.8
2
0
.07
23
.92
0
.30
3.1
8
0
.04
6.0
9
0
.14
1.9
4
0
.08
2.7
3
0
.07
5.1
0
0
.08
99
.95
0
.17
G.
fili
cin
ia
6.8
4
0
.12
4.2
7
0
.06
9.8
3
0
.13
2.0
8
0
.10
19
.74
0
.29
3.1
0
0
.08
29
.96
0
.30
-
11
.56
0
.19
-
6.6
9
0
.07
5.9
0
0
.21
99
.97
0
.29
Values are expressed as the mean SD; n = 3
The maximum surface water temperature at Mandapam and Kilakarai (34 C) was
recorded during the pre-monsoon season in August, 2007 and the minimum temperature 33.1 C
was observed at the post monsoon season in February, 2008. Difference in surface water
temperature pattern is quite evident as surface water temperature depends on the solar energy
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-155-
input and it seems to be influenced by several environmental conditions and factors such as
inflow of freshwater, solar radiation, warming, evaporation, cooling, wind pattern and mix up
with flow from adjoining neurotic waters. Similar seasonal variations were reported from east
coast of India (Figure 1) [5].
Fig. 1. Map showing collection spot
The monthly surface water temperature fluctuation were different for the west coast of
India as compared to that of the east coast of India [6-8] However, there is a significant and
positive correlation between atmospheric temperature and surface water temperature in the east
and west coasts of India [9].
pH remained alkaline throughout the study period at Kilakarai and Mandapam with
maximum values during the summer season. These observations supported the earlier report from
Rushikulya estuary [10]. The uptake of CO2 by the photosynthesizing organism especially
phytoplankton from the estuarine water could have increased the pH levels during the summer
season. In general, pH was low during the monsoon season and this was associated with lesser
salinity regimes.
Distribution of minerals such as Ca, Mg, Na and Cl was high in the selected species of
seaweeds in the study area. Significantly higher concentration of elements such as Ca, Mg and
K were encountered in the various type of seaweeds during summer and post-monsoon periods
which reflect the capacity of these seaweed to accumulate more amount of elements during
these seasons. The concentration of Na was also found to be high during summer and pre-
monsoon seasons which coinciding with peak period of growth [11]. Moreover, differences in
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-156-
element concentration of seaweeds in the study area, during the various seasons might be related
not only to different mineral level in water but also to different ecological conditions such as tidal
range, temperature and salinity [12]. Generally, bioaccumulation of the elements in the seaweeds
depends upon the pH, salinity, dissolved O2 and the osmotic potential of the system [13]. Marine
algae exhibit high content of ash [14] mainly due to the presence of Na, K, Ca and Mg cations
(Fe and S will be of minor importance).
Higher accumulation of Mg and Fe was mostly observed in seaweeds during summer
season, it may be explained here that the accumulation elements in situ was more due to the
reduction in osmoregulation activities usually affected by the increase in salinity. Though the
silicon and Cl concentrations in ambient water exceeded those of other elements, the
accumulation in seaweeds was very low and the most preferred being Ca, Mg and Na. This
probably due to the fact that Ca and Mg are the predominant occupants of the uptake binding sites
of the seaweeds which would inhibit accumulation of silicon and Cl by their competition for
binding sites [15]. The enhanced bioaccumulation of most of the elements in seaweeds during
summer and pre-monsoon seasons could perhaps be due to the following reasons: (i) ambient
concentration of these elements was high during these seasons thereby facilitating their uptake by
the seaweeds, (ii) seasonal variation in mineral content in seaweed may be related to growth
rates and metabolic activity. [12, 16, 17]. The quick uptake of elements during summer and
slow uptake during winter and (iii) ecological implications are important in metal uptake by
seaweeds [18]. This was evident as dissolved oxygen and pH of the water samples during
various seasons in the present study showed the variations of correlation between various
elements in the seaweeds. Our results showed maximum values of oxygen during summer and
minimum during the winter. The higher values of oxygen during summer (April-June) are
associated with the rise in seaweeds population [20]. These observations are in agreement with
those of who reported that the seasonal variations of the mineral concentration in aquatic biota
may be due to seasonal fluctuation in tissue mass and changes in physico-chemical
characteristics of the surrounding water [20-28].
4. CONCLUSION
Seaweeds possesses most of the nutrients. This growth and distribution were varied for
the altering seasonal influence in Kilkarai and Mandapam costal region of Gulf of Mannar
biosphere reserve.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to Centralized Instrumentation Service Laboratories (CISL) generously providing SEM-EDS
studies and also would like to sincerely thank to Professor and Head, Department of Botany, Annamalai University
to provide Phytochemical Laboratory studies
References
[1] Darcy-Vrillon, B., 1993. Nutritional aspects of the developing use of marine macroalgae
for the human food industry. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 44: S23-S35
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-157-
[2] Mabeau, S. and J. Fleurence, 1993. Seaweeds in food products; biochemical and
nutritional aspects. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 4: 103-107
[3] Sivakumar, K. and R. Rangasamy. 1999. X-ray microanalysis of cell wall plastid and
Floridean starch of Hypnea musciformis (Wulf.) Lamour (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta).
Seaweed Res. Utiln. 1999. 21: 49-55
[4] Varadachari, V.V.R., V. Kesava Rao and D. Sengupta, 1987. Oceans and the Indian
summer monsoon a review. Contributions in Marine Sciences, pp. 141-174
[5] Murthy, M.S., M. Bhattacharya and P. Radia, 1978. Ecological studies on the intertidal
algae at Okha (India). Bot. Mar. 21: 381-386
[6] Thangaraj, G.S., V. Sivakumar, R. Chandran, R. Santhanam, B. Srikrishnadhas and K.
Ramamoorthy, 1979. An environmental inventory of Portonovo coastal zone. Proc.
Symp. Environ. Biol. 75-87
[7] Untawale, A.G., C.R.K. Reddy and G.V. Deshmukhe, 1989. Ecology of intertidal
benthic algae of northern Karnataka coast. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 18: 73-81
[8] Stella Roslin, A. and S. Lazarus, 2001. Seasonal variations of environmental parameters
in the Arockiapuram coast. Seaweed Res. Utiln. 23: 89-99
[9] Ramesh Kumar, M.R. and A.A. Fernandes, 1994. Variability of surface meteorological
parameters over the Arabian Sea. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 23: 8-13
[10] Gouda, R. and R.C. Panigrahy, 1993. Monthly variations of some hydrographic
parameters in the Rushikulya estuary, east coast of India. Mahasagar, 26: 73-85
[11] Jayasankar, R. and G. Kulandaivelu, 1999. Seasonal variation in the biochemical
constituents of Gracilaria spp. with reference to growth. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 28: 464-466
[12] Munda, I.M. and V. Hudnik, 1991. Trace metal content in some seaweeds from the
northern Adriatic. Bot. Mar. 34: 241-249
[13] Styron, C.E., T.M. Hagan, D.R. Campbell, J. Harvin, N.K. Whittenburg, G.A.
Baughman, M.E. Bransford, W.H. Saunders, D.C. Williams, C. Woodle, N.K. Dixon
and C.R. McNeill. 1976. Effect of temperature and salinity on growth and uptake of Zn-
65 and Cs-137 for six marine algae. J. Mar. Biol. Assn. U.K., 56: 13-20
[14] De Boer, J.A., 1981. Nutrients. In: Lobban, C.S. and M.J. Wynne (eds.), The Biology of
Seaweeds, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp. 359-391
[15] Foster, P., 1976. Concentration and concentration factors of heavy metals in brown
algae. Environ. Poll. 10: 45-54
[16] Myklestad, S., I. Eide and S. Melsom, 1978. Exchange of heavy metals in Ascophyllum
nodosum (L.) Lejol. In situ by means of transplantation experiments. Environ. Poll. 16:
277-284
[17] Eide, L., S. Myklestad and S. Melsom, 1980. Long term uptake and release of heavy
metals by Ascopyllum nodosum (L.) Le Jol. (Phaeophyceae) in situ. Environ. Poll. Ser.
A. Ecol. Biol. 23: 19-28
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-158-
[18] Kremer, B.P. and I.M. Munda, 1982. Ecophysiological studies of the Adriatic seaweed
Fucus versoides. Mar. Ecol. 3: 75-95
[19] Bhatt, S.D. and U. Negi, 1985. Physico-chemical features and phytoplankton population
in a subtropical pond. Com. Physiol. Ecol. 10: 85-88
[20] Chan, H.M., 1989. Temporal and spatial fluctuations in trace metal concentration in
transplanted mussels in Hong Kong. Mar. Poll. Bull. 20: 82-86
[21] Fadhila Larasanti, Rusky Intan Pratama, Kiki Haetami, Iis Rostini, The addition of
seaweed flour (Kappaphycus alvarezii) and carrageenan on the preference level of
freshwater pomfret meatballs. Scientific News of Pacific Region 3 (2019) 30-40
[22] Nadine M.S. Moubayed, Hadeel Jawad Al Houri, Manal, M. Al Khulaifi, Dunia, A. Al
Farraj. Antimicrobial, antioxidant properties and chemical composition of seaweeds
collected from Saudi Arabia (Red Sea and Arabian Gulf). Saudi Journal of Biological
Sciences Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2017, Pages 162-169
[23] S. Kumar, Chandini P. Ganesan, N. Bhaskar. In vitro antioxidant activities of three
selected brown seaweeds of India. Food Chemistry Volume 107, Issue 2, 15 March
2008, Pages 707-713
[24] Agadi, V., Bhosle, N. & Untawale, A. (2009). Metal Concentration in Some Seaweeds
of Goa (India). Botanica Marina, 21(4), pp. 247-250. doi:10.1515/botm.1978.21.4.247
[25] Manoj Kumar, Puja Kumari, Nitin Trivedi, Mahendra K. Shukla, Vishal Gupta,
C. R. K. Reddy, Bhavanath Jha. Journal of Applied Phycology October 2011, Volume
23, Issue 5, pp 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-010-9578-7
[26] Vanessa M. Skrzypczyk, Karen M. Hermon, Fernando Norambuena,
Giovanni M. Turchini, Russell Keast, Alecia Bellgrove. Is Australian seaweed worth
eating? Nutritional and sensorial properties of wild-harvested Australian versus
commercially available seaweeds. Journal of Applied Phycology February 2019,
Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 709–724
[27] Angell AR, Mata L, de Nys R, Paul NA (2016). The protein content of seaweeds: a
universal nitrogen-to-protein conversion factor of five. J Appl Phycol 28: 511-524
[28] Besada V, Andrade JM, Schultze F, González JJ (2009). Heavy metals in edible
seaweeds commercialised for human consumption. J Mar Syst 75: 305-313
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-159-
Plate 1. Morphology of brown and red seaweeds
World Scientific News 129 (2019) 147-160
-160-
Plate 2. Scanning electron microscopic observation