Sea-Ice Mapping with L-Band Radar - smap.jpl.nasa.govsmap.jpl.nasa.gov/files/smap2/3.6...

12
Sea-Ice Mapping with L-Band Radar Son V. Nghiem Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology MS 300-235, Tel: 818-354-2982 [email protected] SMAP Workshop Arlington, Virginia 9 July 2007

Transcript of Sea-Ice Mapping with L-Band Radar - smap.jpl.nasa.govsmap.jpl.nasa.gov/files/smap2/3.6...

Sea-Ice Mapping with L-Band Radar

Son V. NghiemJet Propulsion Laboratory

California Institute of TechnologyMS 300-235, Tel: 818-354-2982

[email protected]

SMAP WorkshopArlington, Virginia

9 July 2007

Abrupt Arctic Sea Ice ReductionLoss in perennial sea ice extent

was as large as Texas

12/21/2005perennialmixedseasonalthin ice thick ice

12/21/2004

Nghiem et al., Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 33, L17501, 2006.

3SVN/

Pere

nnia

l ice

are

a (m

illio

n km

2 )Pe

renn

ial i

ce a

rea

(mill

ion

km2 )

Perennial Sea Ice Change – 1957 to 2007

1970-2000:Decrease of 0.5x106

km2/decade.

In this decade:Rapid reduction of perennial sea ice.

Nghiem, Rigor, Perovich, Weatherly, and Neumann, manuscript, 2007.

4SVN/

Rapid Sea Ice Change Issues• Energy and mass balance• Ice-albedo feedback• Dynamic-thermodynamic interactions• Sea ice monitoring, modeling, and

forecast• Important parameters: ice extent, ice

classes, motion, melt onset/freeze-up, melt ponds, thickness

• SMAP enhances sea ice measurements in addition to optical sensor, SAR, altimeter, radiometer, and scatterometer

5SVN/

• SMAP robust approach to map sea ice

• SMAP resolution at 1-3 km: SAR < SMAP < Current scatterometer

• SMAP daily coverage in Arctic (~90%): SAR < SMAP < Current scatterometer

• Sea ice mapping in various conditions:

- Weather (clear and cloudy): Lower microwave frequencies

- Wind speed (wide range): Multi-polarizations at the same large incidence angle

- Snow cover (less effects): Lower snow attenuation and scattering

SMAP and Sea Ice Mapping Capability

6SVN/

Robust Approach to Map Sea Ice

• L-band backscatter at 40o

incidence angle: Simple algorithm avoiding variations in incidence angles

• Sigma-0 equivalent noise floor < –34 dB: See more ice classes with low noise floor

-34 dB

-34 dB

2

4

8

1216

2024

40o

40o

Nghiem, Technical Report, March 2007.

7SVN/

Robust Approach to Map Sea Ice

• Co-located HH and VV at 40o incidence angle: Robust sea-ice/water detection over a large range of wind speeds

Nghiem, Technical Report, March 2007.

40o8

8SVN/

Coverage of Polar Regions

• Cover 90% of Arctic in one day

• Cover 70% two times per day (enhancement of melt mapping)

Latitude (degree)

Perc

enta

ge o

f ar

ea m

appe

d

SMAP Coverage and Revisit

9SVN/

1906

2003

The Northwest Passage

10SVN/

The Parry ChannelA historical gateway of the Northwest Passage

75 km

SensorCross-

channelpixels

QuikSCAT 3

SMAP radar 25-75

ALOS ScanSAR 750

Devon Island

11SVN/

Measurement through Snow Cover• Rayleigh scattering with power

index = 4.0 Backscatter at L-band is 460 times less than C-band, 23000 times less than Ku-band

• SMAP radar sees through most Arctic snow (20 cm – 30 cm)

• Combination with Ku-band data (sensitive to snow and ice) to measure snow on sea ice needs to be studied.

Nghiem and Tsai (IEEE TGARS, 39, 10, 2118 -2134, 2001), using data from Stiles and Ulaby(JGR, 85, C2, 1037-1044, 1980):HH polarization, 50o incidence angle, 26cm dry snow.Snow measurements during Healy Cruise HY-01-03,

Barents Sea, Oct-Nov 2001 (Nghiem et al., IICWG-3, Tromso, Norway, November 2001).

12SVN/

SUMMARY on Sea-Ice Mapping with SMAP L-Band Radar

• Constant incidence angle simplifying ice mapping algorithm

• Co-located multi-polarizations allowing ice detection in almost all wind conditions

• Low-noise-floor measurements identifying more sea ice classes

• L-band frequency seeing through clouds, darkness, and most polar snow conditions

• Most importantly the resolution of 1-3 km with a daily coverage of 90% of polar regions

• Simple automated algorithm for operational ice monitoring

• Further investigations for potential: Combination with SMAP radiometer, ice thickness, and melt pond fraction