Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

35

Transcript of Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Page 1: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner
Presenter
Presentation Notes
Screen showing whilst group congregates
Page 2: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

2

Presentation to NACTO WorkshopIntroducing Corridor Bus Priority in congested urban environments

6th /7th April 2010

London’s Bus Priority

STEPHEN PALMERHead of Strategy, Transport for London

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Intro slide
Page 3: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

3

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 4: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner
Page 5: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

5

London’s Buses

• One of the largest and most comprehensive urban bus systems in the world - 8,200 London buses carry about 6.5 million passengers on over 700 different routes each weekday (2.26 billion passengers / year)

• A regulated network administered by TfL

Page 6: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

6

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 7: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Change in Employment 2001 to 2025

Employment Change2001 t o 2025 (number of jobs)

4,000 to 60,0002,000 to 4,000

500 to 2,000Up to 500

Source: B5.2 (GLA v8.07)location:Q:\06 TNP\02 TNP projects\07 T2025\02 GIS\03 Employment\2026\20061106 Employment 2026 - 2001(v4).WOR

Job and population growth will be in different locations

Projected Population Growth2001 - 2025

Concentrated job growth in a central east-west corridor

Population growth across London

Populat ion Change2001 to 2025 (number of people)

3,000 & above2,000 to 3,0001,000 to 2,000Up to 1000

Change in Populat ion 2001 to 2025

Source: B5.2 (GLA v8.07)Location:Q:\06 TNP\02 TNP projects\07 T2025\02 GIS\02 Population\2026\20061106_Population Change 2026-2001_v4.WOR'This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. (GLA)(100032379) (2006).

Populat ion Change2001 to 2025 (number of people)

3,000 & above2,000 to 3,0001,000 to 2,000Up to 1000

Employment Change2001 t o 2025 (number of jobs)

4,000 to 60,0002,000 to 4,000

500 to 2,000Up to 500

Source:Transport 2025 Nov 2006

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Recap on the key land use challenge, the disconnect between the location of housing and employment Creates the two public transport challenges Why is this the model for growth Because businesses in the high value sectors particularly will want to locate in central london And we couldn’t replicate the capacity and quality of pt across numerous town centres Having said this, the london plan and T2025 contain policies to support the development of town centres
Page 8: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Travel growth will be significant

2005 2025

10m

public transport

carwalk

cycle

public transport

car

27.2m journeys 31.2m journeys

37%41%

41%

32%walk

cycle

22%21%

4m extra journeys each day must be supported by public transport, walking

& cycling

11m

4% shift since 2000

The task – Improving public transport

Source:Transport 2025 Nov 2006S5 Targets

Presenter
Presentation Notes
And if we look at likely impact on trips – Extra 4 million journeys PT mode share up by 4% Increase in travel large on top of existing huge demands Big mode shifts needed
Page 9: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Our challenge: more population, employment - and bus passengers over the next 10-20 years

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

1995

2000

2005

Inde

x: 1

993

= 10

0

2010

2015

180

190

200

Bus Passenger Kms: • 15% increase to 2016• 35% increase to 2025

Population: 11% (800k) increase to 2016

Employment: 14% (636k) increase to 2016

Bus boardings could increase by almost 50% to 2025 Bus boardings could increase by almost 50% to 2025

Presenter
Presentation Notes
And so – What does this mean for bus ? This graph illustrates the sharp increase in bus pax post 2000 when TfL was formed and the expected rise to 2016 and beyond.
Page 10: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Bus – T2025 Vision Nov 2006

The bus system will play a key role in supporting economic growth, tackling climate change and improving social inclusion

The multi-purpose nature of bus is the only mode that can serve such diverse needs

Prior to the delivery of new rail schemes, bus is the only feasible way to support London’s growth

And additional bus capacity will be critical as part of the complementary measures for RUC in the congestion and emissions reduction plan

An additional 40% extra bus capacity will be needed by 2025

Effective end-end bus priority measures will be a critical success factor

Source:Transport 2025 Nov 2006

Presenter
Presentation Notes
So what does T2025 say about the BUS ? Last bullet – end 2 end bus priority Bus moves more people by pt than any other mode, 50% of market Bus 10 different roles Flexibility and coverage Important in the period prior to major rail schemes and then in the cerp package to complement ruc
Page 11: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

11

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of intense Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 12: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

1994

Page 13: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Barnet

Tower HamletsWestminster

Kensington & Chelsea

City of London

IslingtonCamden

Hackney

Hammersmith & Fulham Southwark

NewhamBarking

& Dagenham

Kingston upon Thames

Richmond upon Thames

Hounslow

Havering43

Bexley

Brent

Bromley

Croydon

Ealing

Enfield

Greenwich

HaringeyHarrow

Hillingdon

LambethLewisham

Merton

Redbridge

Sutton

Waltham Forest

Wandsworth

Scale 1cm = 2.5km approx.

Legend

LBI 1

LONDON BUS INITIATIVE

Geoff Waite - GIS Manager10 Greycoat PlaceLondon SW1P 1SBT 0207 960 6858

Draw n By - Kellie Stew art 18/06/01

LBI 2

Route 43 43

Crown Copyright 2000. Produced Using TfL MapInfo V6.0 C

G:\gis\lbi gis\workspaces\pdf \..........LBI 1 + 2 + Route43

ROUTE 43, LBI 1 & 2

The London Bus Initiative - 2000

Page 14: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Overview: LBI whole-route approach

Whole Route ImplementationPlan

CountdownBus LaneEnforcement

Cameras

Route TrafficManagement

Strategy

Buses Enforcement

Driver Training

Buses

Bus stopImprovements

Accessible PassengerSheltersPassenger

shelters

Enforcement

CountdownPassenger information

Driver training

Bus laneenforcement

cameras

Route trafficmanagement

strategy

Bus priority: physical + SVD

Page 15: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

15

Third Generation Bus Priority (3GBP)The Concept

•Bus priority “corridor management”

•Partnership approach between TfL and LBPN representing London Boroughs (builds on previous relationships developed through LBI 1 and 2.

•10 year programme treating up to 36 routes - 10 routes to be taken forward in Tranche 1

•Benefits up to 60 coincident routes

Page 16: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Bus Priority Elements used in 3GBP• Traffic management delivery plan

• Partnership of Safety, cycling, walking, urban realm along bus route

• Strategic Urban Realm Plan

• Route enforcement plan and operation

• Kerbside control plan with inset parking & loading bays

• Route traffic signal control plan incorporating SVD

• Freight and access plan (incl Servicing & Taxis)

• Bus operations plan – adjustingbus schedules to capture journeytime improvements

• ‘Track management’ plan &operation – on-going benefitsmanagement

Presenter
Presentation Notes
And in terms of what it might look like on the ground ………
Page 17: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

17

Business Case: “Do Something”KEY FACTS

• £81m over 5 year period (2008 – 2013)

Benefits of the “do something” plan:

• Net Financial Effect (NFE) is positive at £47.3m over 10 years

• Proxy BCR greatly exceeds TfL min standard of 1.5:1

• 77% of Tranche 1 benefits delivered by 2013

• Benefits of £609.3m over 10 years

• £12m of Safety Benefits in first five years of programme

• Meets social inclusion and accessibility objectives

• Walking & Cycling improvements

• Public Realm

Page 18: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

18

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 19: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

LBI Delivered (1)

• Measures helping passengers - ‘in bus’– Over 100 new bus lanes– Over 100 bus lanes improved in length/time– Signal priority (SVD) at over 300 junctions

• Measures helping passengers - ‘to bus’– 50 signal pedestrian facilities– 50 junction ‘all greens’ for pedestrians

• Measures helping all vehicle users– 146 physical signal junction modifications– plus over 200 further signal timing changes

Page 20: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

LBI Delivered (2)

• Passenger Information– 981 bus stops have Countdown– Over 300 bus stops have spider maps

• Of the 2,500 bus stops on the 27 LBI routes 40% had shelters installed or renewed for improved passenger comfort. 72% of these stops now have shelters

Page 21: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Delivered (3)• Operational improvements

– New accessible low floor buses– BTEC driver training programme running– New Quality Incentive Contracts for bus cleaning

• Enforcement– 30 SLA agreements signed with Local Authorities– 92 additional attendants– Over 200 new borough CCTV cameras– 1 in 6 buses have bus lane cameras

Page 22: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Bus Priority Outcomes From LBI 1

Annual patronage: LBI routes’ (left scale) & all network (right scale)

24.5 23.633.1 37.3 40.4

111 118125

135

19.7 22.534.7

1,289 1,357 1,4271,557

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03

Ann

ual p

atro

nage

, LBI

millio

ns

0

200

400

600

800

1,000

1,200

1,400

1,600

Ann

ual p

atro

nage

, all ne

twor

k,

millio

ns

QWR+ QWR WR All network (right scale)

Annual patronage on all 27 LBI routes - Increased by 22.1% from 163 million pa to 200 million pa (compared with a network-wide increase of 20.8%) Financially positive benefits: £12.0 million pa plus bus passenger benefits

Page 23: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

23

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 24: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Route 38 - web site - www.busroute38.co.uk

Page 25: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Route 38 - Bloomsbury

Page 26: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Route 38 – Essex Road

Page 27: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Route 38 – Shaftesbury Ave ( Theatre land)

• Footways widened & re-paved• Inset Loading bays• Traffic Calming speed Tables• Pedestrian Crossings• £1.05M

Page 28: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Route 38 – Piccadilly Circus

Page 29: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

Route 38 – Piccadilly Circus

Page 30: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

East London Transit – Opened Feb 2010

30

Page 31: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

31

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 32: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

32

Traffic Signal Technology - Differential Priority

• Builds on new iBus GPRS system

• Priority is given according to the individual requirements of buses

• Varying levels of priority given depending upon need (e.g. late bus)

• Could target higher occupancy buses

• Improves punctuality/regularity and reduces passenger waiting times

• Less impact on non-priority traffic (as fewer buses awarded priority)

Page 33: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

33

Presentation - Outline• Background

• The Challenges

• London – A decade of Bus Priority

• Achievements

• Case Studies

• Future Developments

• Summary

Page 34: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

34

Summary• 1236 Bus Lanes – 300km

• Improved JT and Reliability for buses saving £30M per annum ( + £20M pax)

• Helped achieve modal and climate change targets – 5% modal shift Car2Bus

• 80% Londoners ( 90% Cyclists) support bus priority and bus lanes

• Multi modal corridor schemes offer increased benefits through integrated interventions

• Effective community engagement key

Page 35: Screen showing whilst group congregates - NYU Wagner

35

Questions