Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and...

10
Scratch for Science

Transcript of Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and...

Page 1: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Scratch for Science

Page 2: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Computational Thinking

• Jeanette Wing, 2006• Core theme in CS education, more and more in

other subjects

• Abstraction• Automation

• eScience Institute, SECANT, Matter & Interactions

Page 3: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Data Collection and Analysis

• Excel (Excelets, also mathematical models)• Lab probes, software• Commodity hardware (phones, Arduino) for

data collection

Page 4: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Scratch for Science

• Limited need to teach the tool– Students pick it up faster than we do!

• Power of a versatile programming language• Teacher-created resources• Peer-created resources• Assessments• Simulations

Page 5: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Interactive Tutorials

• Similar to HyperCard stacks of the past• More dynamic than PowerPoint• Students can tweak, contribute• Could take place of paper, poster

Page 6: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Learning Games

• Motivating for students– More likely to practice on own time

• Can be tailored to your classes' needs• Students can take a part in shaping them

Page 7: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Modeling and Simulation

• "In these dynamic Turtle Microworlds, [students] come to a different kind of understanding – a feel for why the world works as it does." – Seymour Papert, 1979

• Constructionism – learning through building and testing

• Explore unapproachable phenomena• Can be made into games (motivation)

Page 8: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Students Creating Games

• They want to learn realistic physics• The math can be very serious• They show their friends

Page 10: Scratch for Science. Computational Thinking Jeanette Wing, 2006 Core theme in CS education, more and more in other subjects Abstraction Automation eScience.

Clement J. (2000) Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), pp. 1041-1053

Colella, V. S., Klopfer, E., & Resnick, M. (2001). Adventures in Modeling: Exploring Complex, Dynamic Systems with StarLogo. Teachers College Press.

De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201.

diSessa, Andrea (2000) Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy, MIT Press, Boston MA

Foley, B. (1999), “How Visualizations Alter the Conceptual Ecology” presented at the AERA annual meeting 1999, Montreal, Canada

Foley, B. & Kawasaki, J (April, 2009) “Building Models from Scratch” Paper presented at the American EducationalResearch Association meeting, San Diego CA

Gobert, J.D. & Pallant, A. (2004) Fostering Students’ Epistemologies of Models via Authentic Model-Based Tasks Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 13, No. 1,

National Research Council (2011). Report of a Workshop of Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. National Academies Press.

Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc. New York, NY, US

Schwarz, C. and White, B. (2005) Meta-modeling knowledge: Developing students' understanding of scientific modeling. Cognition and Instruction 23:2 , pp. 165-205

Sherin, B., diSessa, A. & Hammer, D. (1993). Dynaturtle Revisited: Learning Physics Through Collaborative Design of a Computer Model. Interactive Learning Environments, 3 (2), 91-118

Stewart, J., Passmore, C., Cartier, J., Rudolph, J. and Donovan, (2005) Modeling for understanding in science education in S. Romberg, T., Carpenter, T. and Dremock, F. (eds) Understanding mathematics and science matters pp. 159-184. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates , Mahwah, NJ

White, B. and Fredericksen, J. (1998) Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction 16:1 , pp. 3-118.