ScRAP Sc ottish R eduction in A ntibiotic P rescribing P rogramme

48
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Multidisciplinary ScRAP Scottish Reduction in Antibiotic Prescribing Programme Prescriber Learning Event “Reducing the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics” “Can we ScRAP the unnecessary antibiotic prescription?” October 2013 edition

description

ScRAP Sc ottish R eduction in A ntibiotic P rescribing P rogramme. Prescriber Learning Event “Reducing the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics” “Can we ScRAP the unnecessary antibiotic prescription?” October 2013 edition. Introduction & contents. Aim of ScRAP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of ScRAP Sc ottish R eduction in A ntibiotic P rescribing P rogramme

Page 1: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

ScRAPScottish Reduction in Antibiotic Prescribing Programme

Prescriber Learning Event

“Reducing the unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics”

“Can we ScRAP the unnecessary antibiotic prescription?”

October 2013 edition

Page 2: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Introduction & contents

• Aim of ScRAP• Facilitator led DVD presentation & discussion session• What will be covered?

• What are the barriers to decreasing antibiotic use?• Resisting resistance – Presenting the evidence

– Local prescribing data

• Patient expectations – Examining a typical patient consultation• Managing complications – Targeted use of antibiotics

– Myth busters

– Alternative strategies – delayed prescriptions

• Event closure

Page 3: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

What are the barriers to decreasing antibiotic use?

Page 4: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5N3dcPmxW0

Page 5: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Introduction & contents

• Aim of ScRAP

• Facilitator led DVD presentation & discussion session

• What will be covered:• What are the barriers to decreasing antibiotic use?• Resisting resistance – Presenting the evidence

– Local prescribing data

• Patient expectations – Examining a typical patient consultation• Managing complications – Targeted use of antibiotics

– Myth busters

– Alternative strategies – delayed prescriptions

• Event closure

Page 6: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

What are the barriers to reducing antibiotic prescribing?

• Understanding reality of antimicrobial resistance?

• Concern of unintended harm as a result of not prescribing an antibiotic?

• Demands, expectations and previous experience of patients and their representatives?

Page 7: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Resisting resistance –presenting the evidence

Page 8: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Page 9: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Page 10: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

ESAC data 2003Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe, 2003

ESAC data 2010 Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in Europe, 2010

Antibiotic usage at a European population level

United Kingdom United

Kingdom

United Kingdom

Sw

eden

Sw

eden

Page 11: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Antibiotic resistance at a European population level

Goossens et al. Lancet 2005; 365: 579-587Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance: a cross-national database study

Page 12: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Antibiotic resistance at practice population level

Butler et al. Br J Gen Pract 2007; 57, 785Containing antibiotic resistance: decreased antibiotic-resistant coliform urinary tract infections with reduction in antibiotic prescribing by general practices.

Quartile 1 Quartile 2 Quartile 3 Quartile 4 Overall

Ampicillin

Year 1 % 58.7 50.6 49.2 50.0 51.3

Year 7 % 53.5 51.0 51.6 49.7 51.2

Reduction % (95% CI) 5.2(2.9 to 7.4) -0.4 (-2.3 to 1.5) -2.4 (-4.1 to -0.7) 0.3 (-1.4 to 2.0) 0.0 (-0.9 to 1.0)

Trimethoprim

Year 1 % 29.1 26.6 26.5 25.5 25.5

Year 7 % 25.7 24.9 25.0 24.7 25.0

Reduction % (95% CI) 3.4 (1.3 to 5.4) 1.7 (0.1 to 3.3) 1.5 (0.0 to 2.9) 0.8 (-0.7 to 2.3) 0.4 (-0.8 to 1.7)

Reduction (%) in resistance to ampicillin & trimethoprim over a 7-year period, by quartile of reductions in total antibiotic prescribing

Page 13: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Antibiotic resistance at patient level

• Individuals prescribed an antibiotic in primary care for a respiratory or urinary infection develop bacterial resistance to that antibiotic

• The effect is greatest in the month immediately after treatment but may persist for up to 12 months

• This effect not only increases the population carriage of organisms resistant to first line antibiotics, but also creates the conditions for increased use of second line antibiotics in the community

Costelloe et al. BMJ 2010:340 c2090Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Page 14: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

• What information did you already know?

• What information was new?

• What has the information added to your understanding of antimicrobial resistance?

• How do you think this might affect how you interact with patients in the future?

Page 15: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Resisting resistance – local prescribing data

Page 16: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Antibiotic usage at a national level

Scottish Medicines Consortium / Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group. Report on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Humans in 2011

Page 17: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Antibiotic usage at a national level

Scottish Medicines Consortium / Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group. Report on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Humans in 2011

Page 18: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Antibiotic usage at a national level

Scottish Medicines Consortium / Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group. Report on Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Humans in 2011

Page 19: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

• Antibiotic use at local level

• How does your antibiotic usage compare with other local practices in your health board?

• Was your antibiotic use higher or lower than you expected?

• How has your antibiotic usage changed over time?

• Was the change in your antibiotic usage more or less than you expected?

• Key points from local guidelines

Page 20: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Patient expectations – examining a typical patient consultation

Page 21: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Expectations – but whose are they really?

Page 22: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Expectations – but whose are they really?

• Health care professionals over-estimate patient demand for antibiotics

• In patients with bronchitis, antibiotic prescribing had no effect on patient satisfaction scores

• Whereas careful physical examination did

V Duijn et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 July 1; 57(540): 561–568.Illness behaviour and antibiotic prescription in patients with respiratory tract symptoms

Page 23: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Patient consultation video

Page 24: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

• ICE approach

(Matthys et al. Patients' ideas, concerns, and expectations (ICE) in general practice: impact on prescribing Br J Gen Pract. 2009 January 1; 59(558): 29–36)

• Examination and its role in patient satisfaction • Treating concerns not desires • Explanation – not a battle of wills• Explanation – natural history of infection• Safety net option• Any changes to consultation technique?

Page 25: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Managing complications –targeted use of antibiotics

Page 26: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Targeted use of antibiotics

• The antibiotic revolution should be more focused...• “Our mission is not to prescribe as few antibiotics as

possible, but to identify that small group of patients who really need antibiotic treatment and to explain, reassure and educate the large group of patients who don’t.”

Van Duijn et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Jul;57(540):561-8. Illness behaviour and antibiotic prescription in patients with respiratory tract symptoms

Page 27: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Targeted use of antibiotics

The following subgroups of patients in whom an immediate antibiotic

strategy should be considered depending on clinical assessment of severity;• Bilateral acute otitis media in children younger than two years• Acute otitis media in children with otorrhoea• Acute sore throat / acute pharyngitis / acute tonsillitis where three or more Centor Criteria* are present • A delayed prescription or no prescription strategy may also be considered

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Respiratory tract infections – Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care. 2008. (Clinical Guideline 69)

*Centor criteria

• Tonsillar exudate• Tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy• History of fever• Absence of cough

Page 28: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Targeted use of antibiotics

An immediate antibiotic prescription and/or further appropriate investigation and management should only be offered to patients (both adults and children) in the following situations:• Systemically very unwell • Symptoms and signs suggestive of serious illness and/or complications (particularly pneumonia, mastoiditis, peritonsillar abscess, peritonsillar cellulitis, intraorbital and intracranial complications)

• High risk of serious complications because of pre-existing comorbidity eg significant heart, lung, renal, liver or neuromuscular disease, immunosuppression, cystic fibrosis, and young children who were born prematurely

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Respiratory tract infections – Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care. 2008. (Clinical Guideline 69)

Page 29: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Targeted use of antibiotics

• If patient is older than 65 years with acute cough and two or more of the following criteria, or older than 80 years with acute cough and one or more of the following criteria:

Hospitalisation in previous year Type 1 or type 2 diabetes History of congestive heart failure Current use of oral glucocorticoids

For these patients, the no antibiotic prescribing strategy and the delayed antibiotic prescribing strategy should not be considered

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Respiratory tract infections – Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care. 2008. (Clinical Guideline 69)

Page 30: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

• Does this information help you understand more clearly the place in therapy of antibiotics in respiratory tract infections?

• Are there instances where you have treated patients out with these criteria?

• Do you feel more confident in not prescribing an antibiotic out with the criteria?

Page 31: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Managing complications – myth busters

Page 32: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – value of antibiotics in RTI

• Without antibiotics 40% will resolve after 3 days and 90% after 7 days

• The NNT (Number Needed to Treat) was 6 to half pain at day 3

Acute sore throat

Spinks et al. Antibiotics for sore throat.Cochrane database for systematic review issue 4 2006

Page 33: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – value of antibiotics in RTI

• 80% resolve in 14 days with no antibiotics

• Antibiotics have a small benefit after 7 days of illness (NNT = 15)

• There was no additional benefit of antibiotics in older patients, more severe pain or longer duration of symptoms

Acute Rhinosinusitis

Ahovuo-Saloranta et al. Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. Cochrane database for systematic reviews issue 2 2008

Page 34: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – value of antibiotics in RTI

• 66% of children are better within 24 hours and antibiotics have no effect on symptoms

• 90% of children are better in 2 to 7 days and antibiotics have only a small effect on reducing pain by 16 hours (NNT =15)

Acute Rhinosinusitis

Ahovuo-Saloranta et al. Antibiotics for acute maxillary sinusitis. Cochrane database for systematic reviews issue 2 2008

Page 35: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – value of antibiotics in RTI

• Antibiotics reduced symptoms by only one day in an illness lasting up to 3 weeks

Acute Cough / Bronchitis

Fahey et al. Antibiotics for acute bronchitis. Cochrane database for systematic reviews issue 4 2004

Page 36: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – value of antibiotics in RTI

• 66% of children are better within 24 hours and antibiotics have no effect on symptoms

• 90% of children are better in 2 to 7 days and antibiotics have only a small effect on reducing pain by 16 hours (NNT =15)

Acute Otitis Media

Sanders et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane database for systematic reviews issue 1 2004

Page 37: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – preventative value ofantibiotics in RTI

• Overall NNT > 4000 to prevent one case of quinsy

Centor score of 3 or 4 = 1:60 chance of quinsy

• Centor criteria:

• Tonsillar exudate• Tender anterior cervical lymphadenopathy• History of fever• Absence of cough

Sore throat and quinsy

Peterson et al. Protective Effects of antibiotics.BMJ 2007;335:982-984

Centor et al. The diagnosis of Strep throat in adults in the emergency room.Med Decision Making 1981;1:239-46

Page 38: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – preventative value ofantibiotics in RTI

• It would take 12 working life times of a GP to see one case of Rheumatic Fever

• Treating sore throats with antibiotics has no effect on risk of developing Rheumatic Fever

Rheumatic Fever

Howie et al. Antibiotics, sore throat and rheumatic fever. BJGP 1985; 35 : 223-224

Page 39: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – preventative value ofantibiotics in RTI

• Glomerulonephritis is a rare condition (2.1 per 100,000 children) and is not prevented by treating sore throats with antibiotics

Glomerulonephritis

Taylor et al. Antibiotics, sore throat and acute nephritis. BJGP 1983; 33 : 783-786

Page 40: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Myth busters – giving an antibiotic does no harm?

• The benefits of antibiotics have to be carefully balanced against their harm

• Most antibiotics can cause gastrointestinal effects such as nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea in some patients

• In addition, a number can cause serious rashes and skin reactions

The harm of antibiotics

British National Formulary 2013;64

• Reviews of antibiotics in people with respiratory tract infections have found that, for every 16 people treated with antibiotics, rather than placebo, 1 person will suffer an adverse event

The harm of antibiotics

Glasziou PP, et al. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children. Cochrane Review. 2004

Page 41: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

• Does this information help you understand more clearly the place in therapy of antibiotics in respiratory tract infections?

• Are their instances where you have treated patients with an antibiotic in these clinical situations?

• Do you feel more confident in not prescribing an antibiotic in these clinical situations as a result of the evidence?

Page 42: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Managing complications- alternative strategies: delayed

prescriptions

Page 43: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Delayed prescriptions Spurling et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007, Issue 3.Cochrane 2007 Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections.

• Delayed prescriptions substantially reduce antibiotic use but might slightly worsen some symptoms compared with immediate prescriptions

• Delayed prescriptions might also reduce re-consultation rates

• For mild upper respiratory tract infections delayed prescriptions are not associated with important negative consequences

Page 44: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Delayed prescriptions Spurling et al. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Issue 4.Cochrane 2013 Delayed antibiotics for respiratory infections. Update of 2007

• Most clinical outcomes show no difference between strategies

• Delay slightly reduces patient satisfaction compared to immediate antibiotics (87% versus 92%) but not compared to none (87% versus 83%)

• In patients with respiratory infections where clinicians feel it is safe not to prescribe antibiotics immediately, no antibiotics with advice to return if symptoms do not resolve is likely to result in the least antibiotic use, while maintaining similar patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes to delayed antibiotics

Page 45: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Delayed prescriptions National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Respiratory tract infections – Prescribing of antibiotics for self-limiting respiratory tract infections in adults and children in primary care. 2008. (Clinical Guideline 69)

When using delayed antibiotic prescriptions, patients should be offered:• Reassurance that antibiotics are not needed immediately since likely to make little difference to symptoms and may have side effects, for example, diarrhoea, vomiting and rash

• Advice about using the delayed prescription if symptoms are not starting to settle in accordance with the expected course of the illness or if a significant worsening of symptoms occurs

• Advice about re-consulting if there is a significant worsening of symptoms despite using the delayed prescription.

• A delayed prescription with instructions - either given to patient or left at an agreed location to be collected at a later date.

Page 46: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

• Any experience of delayed prescriptions?

• How important is patient information in a delayed prescription strategy?

• Is a delayed prescription strategy worthwhile trialling in this practice?

Page 47: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Event closure

Page 48: ScRAP Sc ottish  R eduction in  A ntibiotic  P rescribing  P rogramme

Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland

Multidisciplinary

Facilitator lead discussion

Next steps

What strategy are we going to take to move forward?

Changes to consultation style and/or delayed prescriptions?

• Can we reach a practice consensus?• How we can measure progress?• Evaluations (health board specific & CPD)