Scott Goetz Changes in Productivity with Climate Change at High Latitudes: the role of Disturbance.
-
Upload
abigail-merritt -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
1
Transcript of Scott Goetz Changes in Productivity with Climate Change at High Latitudes: the role of Disturbance.
Fires have become more frequent & extensive..
Temperature and Fire Trends in North American High Latitudes
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1961
1965
1970
1975
1980
1985
1990
1995
2000
Tem
per
atu
re a
no
mal
y (o
C)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Are
a b
urn
ed (
106 h
a)
Temperature (CAN)
NA area burned
Burned area
Air Temp. ∆Ta
Soil Organic Carbon is Concentrated in High Latitudes
Source: USDA, graphic by Steve Allison (UCI)“The Carbon Bomb”
High fire severity
Low fire severity
Mature conifer
Mixed deciduous/conifer
Conifer
Low densitymature conifer
↑ drainage↑ active layerWarmer soil
↓ drainage↓ active layerCooler soil
↑ Albedo↓ NPP
↓ Albedo↑ NPP
Resprouting shrubs
Forbs and grasses
↓ Albedo↓ NPP↓ Biomass↑ SOC
↑ Albedo↑ NPP↑ Biomass↓ SOC accumulation
↑ Albedo↓ NPP↓ Biomass↓ SOC accumulation
↓ Albedo↑ NPP↑ Biomass↑ SOC accumulation
High densitymature conifer
Time
Conditions Predictions Predictions Predictions
Goetz et al. ERL 2007
{Mack, Johnstone, Kasischke}
Fire Severity Implications for Trajectories of Regrowth Productivity & Albedo
Large Fire Database (Stocks)
Burned Area Maps
Large Fire Database (Brian Stocks, CFS)
Vegetation index
Satellite Monitoring of Forest Regrowth following Fire
Anomalies: Burned –vs– Unburned Areas
burned
unburned
difference
fire event →
Growing Season (JJA, bi-monthly)
Goetz et al. RSE 2006
Unburned Areas Photosynthesis
Trends
Goetz et al. PNAS 2005
Trend Tundra m ha (%) Unburned Forest
Negative 2.7 ( 4%) 25.8 (22%)
Near Zero 45.1 (62%) 87.9 (74%)
Positive 24.5 (34%) 5.1 ( 4%)
Trends In Photosynthetic Activity 1982-2005+Trend (-Feedback) -Trend (+Feedback)
Goetz et al. ERL 2007
Weakening of Mid to High Latitude Carbon Sinks
Observed weakening of the growth rate of terrestrial carbon sinks in these regions.
Angert et al. 2005, PNAS; Buermann et al. 2007, PNAS; Ciais et al. 2005, Science; Bunn & Goetz 2006 Earth Int.
Summer 1982-1991
Summer 1994-2002/05
NDVI Anomaly 1982-2004[Normalized Difference Vegetation Index]
Myneni et al. 1997 Science, Slayback & Tucker et al., Zhou et al. [others].
Why do trends in Tundra differ from those of Forest? Responses to Climate
• Using gridded climate data (CCM)
• Tundra responds primarily to maximum summer temperature
• Forest responses are more complicated• Mostly key on previous year’s conditions• Spring minimum temperatures (+) & precipitation (+)• Summer max temperature (-)
Bunn & Goetz, 2005, GRL
1998 2002 2003 2004
Links between High Latitude Productivity and “Drought”
Zhang, Kimball et al., JGRb in pressBunn, Goetz, Kimball et al. Eos 2007
Net Productivity
Dryness of Air (VPD)
1957 2007
Changes in Shrub Growth at High Latitudes
Alaska North Slope photos courtesy of Ken Tape, UAF
Summer net C exchange measured by a mobile eddy covariance tower compared with a reference stationary tower located in tundra
Transitions to shrub tundra and forest are likely to lead to greater summer C storage.
Carbon fluxes at Council, Alaska courtesy of C. Thompson
Changes in vegetation distribution of Arctic Ecosystems will have substantial effects on summer water and energy exchanges between the land surface and the atmosphere (e.g. Thompson et al. 2005, Chapin et al. 2005, Randerson et al. 2006)
Su
mm
er A
lbe
do Strong correlations
between above-ground biomass and albedo, latent & sensible heat fluxes, and net radiation.
Above-ground biomass (g m-2)
Albedo = 2E-09x2 - 3E-05x + 0.2061
R2 = 0.99
0.08
0.1
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.2
0 2000 4000 6000
Tundra
Low shrub
Tall shrubWoodland
Forest