Scotch Street Child Care Needs Analysisbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site16420/Richmount...The...
50
Scotch Street Child Care Needs Analysis March 2018 THIS PROJECT WAS PART FUNDED UNDER PRIORITY 6 (LEADER) OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL AFFAIRS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
Transcript of Scotch Street Child Care Needs Analysisbtckstorage.blob.core.windows.net/site16420/Richmount...The...
Scotch Street Child Care Needs Analysis
March 2018
THIS PROJECT WAS PART FUNDED UNDER PRIORITY 6 (LEADER) OF THE NORTHERN IRELAND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME 2014-2020 BY THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL
AFFAIRS AND THE EUROPEAN UNION
2 | P a g e
CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................... 4
1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4
1.2. Childcare Provision in Northern Ireland ............................................................ 4
1.3. Policy Response .................................................................................................... 7
1.4. The Current Study ................................................................................................ 8
2. AREA PROFILE ................................................................................................. 10
2.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 10
2.2 Scotch Street Village .......................................................................................... 10
2.3 Local Amenities ................................................................................................... 11
2.4 Core Catchment Areas ....................................................................................... 14
2.5 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 16
3. DETERMINANTS OF CHILDCARE DEMAND ........................................... 17
3.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 17
3.2. Population Trends ............................................................................................... 17
3.3. Registered Childcare Places .............................................................................. 17
3.4. Registered Childcare Cost .................................................................................. 19
3.5. Determinants of Demand .................................................................................. 20
3.6. Discussion ............................................................................................................ 23
4. PARENTS PERCEPTIONS OF LOCAL CHILDCARE ................................ 24
4.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 24
4.2 Respondent Demographics ............................................................................... 24
4.3 Employment Status ............................................................................................ 24
4.4 Use of Childcare Provision ................................................................................. 26
4.5 Thoughts on Local Early Years Provision ........................................................ 27
4.6 Thoughts on School Age Provision ................................................................... 28
4.7 Discussion ............................................................................................................ 29
5. RICHMOUNT PLAYGROUP USERS ............................................................ 30
5.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 30
5.2. Rating of Richmount Playgroup Provision ....................................................... 30
5.3. Use of Additional Childcare Provision .............................................................. 30
5.4. Interest in Longer Operating Hours ................................................................. 31
5.5. Discussion ............................................................................................................ 33
6. SUPPORT FOR OUT OF SCHOOLS PROVISION .................................... 35
6.1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 35
3 | P a g e
6.2. Choice of Primary School ................................................................................... 35
6.3. Support for Out of School Provision in Scotch Street ................................... 37
6.4. Preferred Use of Out of School Provision ........................................................ 38
6.5. Interest in a Holiday Club .................................................................................. 40
6.6. Benefit of Out of School Provision ................................................................... 41
6.7. Discussion ............................................................................................................ 43
7. FUTURE SERVICE DEVELOPMENT ............................................................ 44
7.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 44
7.2 Headline Issues ................................................................................................... 44
7.3 Minimum Standards ............................................................................................ 45
7.4 Options and Implications ................................................................................... 46
7.5 Suggested Way Forward .................................................................................... 49
7.6 Immediate Next Steps ....................................................................................... 49
4 | P a g e
1. BACKGROUND
1.1. Introduction
Richmount Rural Community Association (RRCA) is run by volunteer efforts and was established in 2006. Originally serving the village of Scotch Street (est. 1,200 residents) and considerable rural hinterland, its reach now spans Portadown, Richhill and Loughgall. RRCA is extremely active and delivers targeted seniors, youth and increasing Newcomer population activities in addition to those targeted at the wider community. This progressive organisation is mindful and responsive to demographic change and resident need. It has successfully delivered large-scale capital and revenue programmes to include building its own community hub (The Richmount Centre), community gardens and Peace IV funded artwork. In 2014 RRCA established Richmount Playgroup, with three staff members and 24 sessional childcare places.
RRCA received part funding from the Southern Organisation for Action in Rural areas (SOAR) which covers the Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough Council area – SOAR (ABC). SOAR (ABC) is the new Local Action Group with the responsibility for the delivery of Priority 6 of the NI Rural Development Programme (RDP) 2014-20) on behalf of the Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (DARD). In January 2018 RRCA appointed The Research Train Ltd to undertake a needs analysis of child care provision in the Greater Scotch Street area to inform the potential for additional service development. This chapter provides a brief outline of the context for this work.
1.2. Childcare Provision in Northern Ireland
Accessible, flexible and quality childcare is recognised as helping to support child development and wellbeing and reducing barriers to employment, particularly within disadvantaged groups.1 Research indicates that being in a childcare setting has a number of benefits for child to include cognitive and social development2 and improved school-readiness.3 In the longer-term this can help combat social exclusion and child poverty4 through improved earnings potential in adulthood.5 For parents, quality childcare can increase access to
1 NI Executive, (2011). Improving Children’s Life Chances, The Child Poverty Strategy’ 2 Waldergrave, H & Lee, L, (2013) “Quality Childcare: Improving early years childcare”, Policy Exchange (2013) 3 NICHD Early Child Care Research Network and Greg Duncan (2003) ‘Modelling the Impacts of Child Care Quality on Children’s Preschool Cognitive Development.’ Child Development 74: 1454-1475. 4 Jane Waldfogel and Alison Garnham, (November 2008) “Eradicating child poverty: The role of key policy areas - Childcare and Child Poverty” Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 5 Lynch, R. (2004). Exceptional returns: Economic, fiscal and social benefits of investment in early childhood and development. Economic Policy Institute: Washington, D.C.
5 | P a g e
training and employment6, reduce absenteeism7 and address societal social-economic inequalities.8
Childcare can be broadly classed as formal (i.e. registered and/or paid) or informal (i.e. unregistered and/or unpaid). The options generally open to parents include:
• Approved Home Childcare;
• Nanny/Au-pair;
• Crèche Facilities;
• Childminders;
• Day Nurseries;
• Out of School groups;
• Playgroups; and
• Friends/family. OFMdFM funded research 9 found that childminders have a 74% share of the NI registered childcare market. Following this, the next highest category are playgroups which make up 11% of the market. The report stated that 68% of parents used some form of childcare, either formal, informal or early year’s education. A quarter of those using of childcare combined both formal and informal childcare. A large proportion (79%) of those who did make use of childcare have an informal arrangement with a Grandparent or other relative. Almost half of those using childcare have formal arrangements in place, with after school and homework clubs the most popular. Childminders (14%) and day nurseries (10%) were also common. 1.2.1 Availability of Childcare
Analysis of registered childcare services revealed an under provision in Northern Ireland. In 2013, there were almost 56,000 registered childcare places against 355,000 children in the 0-14 age range, meaning there was on average six children for every registered childcare place. When this is broken down by age, there are three children for every pre-school place (0-4 age range). However, childcare for school aged children was identified as the most prevalent area for unmet demand with an estimated 19 school age children for every registered school age childcare place. 10 These ratios varied substantially according to geography. Registered childcare places within the Southern Health and Social Care Trust (SHSCT) area accounted for 15% of the overall NI provision and presented the greatest level of unmet need, with 129 school age children to every registered childcare place.
6 Waldergrave, H & Lee, L, (2013) “Quality Childcare: Improving early years childcare”, Policy Exchange 7“Economic Impacts of Early Care and Education in California”, MacGillvary and Lucia, University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education (August 2011). 8 Temple, J. A. & A. J. Reynolds (2007). Benefits and costs of investments in preschool education: Evidence from the Child-Parent Centers and related programs. Economics of Education Review, 26:126-144. 9 RSM McClure Watters (2014). OFMdFM Childcare Research 10 RSM McClure Watters (2014). OFMdFM Childcare Research
6 | P a g e
Forty percent of parents living in rural areas reported unmet needs for formal childcare, with the most frequently reported unmet need being after-school clubs (50%), followed by childminders (12%).
1.2.2 Barriers to Access
In addition to the availability of childcare places, the accessibility of existing provision also influences parents’ uptake of formal childcare and early years’ provision. The primary driver for childcare use is to enable parents to go to work, although this is less prevalent with those using early years’ education. Affordable and flexible childcare enables parents to seek out training and employment opportunities to increase household income. Lack of affordable childcare has been identified as a key factor in child poverty as it limits parents’ employment options.
Affordability is the greatest barrier amongst those wishing to use additional childcare, with parents from both deprived and relatively affluent areas highlighting that childcare costs are a major in deciding which type of provision to use and, how long to use it for.11
Indeed, The Employers for Childcare surveys suggest a strong relationship between the cost of childcare and economic activity. 12 Parents use an average of 41 hours of childcare each week, with the cost of a full time place averages £168 per week or £8,736 per year. An estimated 43% of earnings were allocated to childcare in 2016. After housing costs the childcare bill was the largest monthly outgoing for families, exceeding grocery bills, heating, transport and other household costs. Sixty-three of parents struggled to meet their childcare bill either throughout the year or at some point during it and one quarter regularly used credit cards, loans from family or friends or payday loans to pay their childcare bill. Fifty percent stated that the high cost of childcare had influenced the number of hours that they work. For many parents this has meant reducing from full-time to part-time hours, changing their patterns of work (e.g. working compressed hours) or leaving work completely. Many families relied on alternative childcare arrangements and 81% of all informal childcare was provided by grandparents.
Fifteen percent of parents report that childcare is not available at the times they require.13 Research within the Southern Health and Social Services Trust (SHSCT) area which investigated the childcare needs of ethnic minorities found that 79% of parents rated flexibility as an important factor in choosing childcare. Those who worked shift patterns including evening/nights and weekends reported difficulty in arranging childcare outside of typical working hours. Moreover, those on zero hours contracts reported that they were unable to make childcare arrangements at short notice which affected their ability to work additional hours.
11 RSM McClure Watters (2014). OFMdFM Childcare Research 12 Employers for Childcare (2016). Northern Ireland Childcare Cost Survey 13 RSM McClure Watters (2014). OFMdFM Childcare Research
7 | P a g e
Transport difficulties have been identified as a significant factor impacting on the provision and accessibility of childcare for people living in rural areas.14 Rural childcare generally does not take into account that rural families need to travel further to and from work, and increased commuting time requires extended hours of childcare to allow for early drop off and/or late collection.
1.3. Policy Response
The Executive’s vision for childcare is: “To achieve childcare provision which meets the needs of children and parents and leads to better outcomes.” The vision is based on seeking to: • Create an environment where childcare is accessible and affordable for all parents; • Ensure a good standard and quality of childcare across Northern Ireland which
contributes positively to child development; and • Improve awareness of and accessibility to information about childcare.
The document sets out a number of aims, to include increasing the number of childcare places from 56,000 to 100,000. One thousand of these places will be flexible childcare, with consideration given to financially supporting childcare centres that open outside normal working hours. The Executive encourages the use of the school estate for childcare facilities and will also look at options for increasing childcare provision in the workplace.
In response, the Executive's Programme for Affordable and Integrated Childcare, Bright Start, sets out the framework, principles and a range of key first actions to help deliver the Executive’s vision for childcare. As a result of the high levels of unmet childcare needs for children aged 4-14 years the following actions focused on increasing or sustaining School Age Childcare provision:
14 Northern Childcare Partnership, (2007). Report on Childcare Issues Affecting Families in Rural Areas.
Affordability
Accessibility
Sustainability Integrated
Quality
Informed
8 | P a g e
• Key Action 1 Address the School Age Childcare needs of disadvantaged communities by sustaining or creating 3,000 School Age Childcare places targeted on low income families;
• Key Action 2 Create between 2,000 and 3,000 new School Age Childcare places in new School Age Childcare settings based on the school estate;
• Key Action 3 Create up to 1,000 new School Age Childcare places based in new School Age Childcare facilities and serving the needs of rural communities.
In order to support the implementation of the three key actions, the NI Executive launched the Bright Start School Age Childcare Grant Scheme. The grant scheme has been rolled out over three funding rounds with a requirement that applicants from the School Age Childcare sector operate under a social economy model. Additional actions include the Bright Start Community Childcare Programme which will support 3000 affordable and integrated childcare places through social enterprise, Bright Start Childcare Information to improve dissemination and Bright Start Workforce Development Programme to enhance the skills base of the childcare workforce.
In support of the Department for Education Vision "every young person achieving to his or her full potential at each stage of his or her development" the Pathway Fund is focused on the following outcomes: • Improved development of children aged from birth to four years who are at risk of
not reaching their full potential within the school system; and • An enhanced more sustainable early year’s sector.
It supports all providers or facilitators of registered early years education and learning provision focused on children 0-4 years.
1.4. The Current Study
Changing working patterns are not generally reflected in the childcare options available to parents, causing difficulties for parents who work outside traditional hours, work shifts or are employed on zero hours contracts. Many families find the cost of childcare too expensive and it is well documented that options and accessibility are reduced in rural areas. Lack of accessibility could increase the risk of children being left unattended for periods of time and/or the use of unregistered childcare.
A core principle of rural development promotes the involvement of communities in the design and delivery of projects and programmes to improve their quality of life through social inclusion, poverty reduction and economic development in rural areas. SOAR (ABC) has provided support to RRCA under the Rural Basic Services Scheme funding stream. This provides an opportunity to explore the need for and practicalities involved in developing additional childcare provision in the Scotch Street area. The research will:
• Analyse local demographics;
9 | P a g e
• Audit the extent, nature and cost of existing childcare provision within the vicinity;
• Explore attitudes towards existing childcare provision in the area; and
• Support Richmount Community Association to explore options for further development.
10 | P a g e
2. AREA PROFILE
2.1 Introduction
This chapter provides an overview of the Scotch Street study area. It aims to increase understanding of the target population and existing childcare provision as it relates to determine localised demand.
2.2 Scotch Street Village
The Scotch Street community is located approximately three miles West of Portadown on the Moy Road and around five miles from the M1 motorway junction, within the Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon District Council area. The Scotch Street settlement boundary primarily incorporates the housing developments of Timakeel, Keelmount and Stewart’s Terrace as well as small sections of Richmount Road and Derryletiff Road as they span off the Moy Road.
Figure 2.1 Scotch Street Settlement Area
During the 2011 Census, Scotch Street had a population of 491 people, living in 196 households. However, the most recent population estimates suggest that the population is in excess of 1,000. The following points are noted:
• Scotch Street has a relatively young population (mean age of 29 years compared to the NI average of 38 years);
• Residents aged 0-4 years were a higher proportion of the population (12%; n61) in comparison to the NI average (7%; n124,382);
• 12% of households were lone parents with dependent children, higher than the NI average (9%);
11 | P a g e
• Eight percent of the population were aged 60+ (n41), which is significantly lower than the NI average of 20% (n358,010);
• 81% of the population aged 16 to 74 years old were economically active, 75% were in paid employment and 5% were unemployed.
2.3 Local Amenities
Within the village there is a Post Office, Gospel Hall, Richmount Primary School, Richmount Playgroup, Filling Station/Mace shop and retail complex. In addition, Davison Quality Foods on Cannagola Beg Road and RiverRidge Recycling on the Moy Road provide employment within the immediate vicinity. However there are also job opportunities on local farms and within the mushroom industry. The village is the only significant settlement between Portadown in County Armagh and the village of Moy in County Tyrone. Scotch Street’s location on the Moy Road means that it is key route for Dungannon/Portadown/M1 commuters. 2.3.1 Richmount Primary School Richmount Primary School is located on the Moy Road. School starts at 8.40am and P1 and P2 pupils finish at 1.55pm, P3s (Thursday and Friday) to P7s finish at 2:40pm. Extra-curricular activities for P4-P7 pupils are available for an hour after school finishes.
Richmount Primary School has 139 places approved by the Department of Education, with 121 enrolments in 2017/18. Reflecting Scotch Street’s housing expansion, enrolments have increased by 27% between 2009/10 – 2017/18.
Figure 2.2 Richmount Primary School Enrolment Trends
Table 2.1 illustrates the changing profile of Richmount Primary School pupils, with an increasing number of Newcomer pupils and those entitled to Free School Meals (FSM).
9591
99108 107
120 120 123 121
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17 2017/18
Pu
pils
Total Pupil Enrolment by Year
12 | P a g e
The proportion of pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN)15 has declined slightly over the period.
Table 2.1 Richmount Primary School Pupil Profile
Year Total
Enrolment Newcomer % FSM% SEN%
2009/10 95 * * 15
2010/11 91 * 6.6 13
2011/12 99 * 8.1 12
2012/13 108 * 11.11 12
2013/14 107 * 18.7 17
2014/15 120 5 20 13
2015/16 120 7.5 24.2 8
2016/17 123 11.4 27.6 8
2017/18 121 12 32 10 *Indicates small numbers/data not collected
Other primary schools within the rural vicinity are:
• St Oliver Plunkett, Ballyhegan (Catholic Maintained);
• The Birches Primary School (Controlled);
• The Cope Primary School, Loughgall (Controlled);
• Orchard County Primary School, Kilmore (Controlled); and
• St John’s Primary School, Annaghmore (Catholic Maintained). The school runs an After Schools Club for P1-P3s between 1.50 pm – 2.40pm, costing £1 per pupil per day. Table 2.2 presents current numbers attending Richmount Primary School After School Club for P1, P2 and P3 pupils (the latter attending Monday – Wednesday only).
Table 2.2 Richmount Primary School After School Club Average Use
Year Total Age Group
Enrolment Total Daily Users User % of
Enrolments
Monday 39 20 51%
Tuesday 39 18 46%
Wednesday 39 20 51%
Thursday 22 5 23%
Friday 22 12 55%
2.3.2 Richmount Playgroup
Richmount Playgroup was established in September 2011 and was relocated to a purpose built facility at 2 Derrylettif Road, Portadown in 2014. The playgroup can accommodate up to 24 children aged from two years 10 months to school age. It
15 Stage 1-5 on Code of Practice
13 | P a g e
operates Monday - Friday from 9:00am – 1:00pm. There are currently three staff employed (a leader employed 35 hours per week, one staff employed 24 hours per week and one staff employed 15 hours per week). During the pre-school year, the Education Authority funds 12.5 hours per week and parents can avail of an additional 1.5 hours per day if required. Table 2.3 illustrates enrolment trends over the last few years. Although the playgroup has grown steadily, there appears to be a higher proportion of pre-preschool, rather than preschool children attending.
Table 2.3 Richmount Playgroup Enrolments
Year Total Enrolment Pre-Preschool Preschool
2014/2015 16 8 8
2015/2016 24 12 12
2016/2017 25 13 12
2017/2018 28 16 12
Examination of the 2018 enrolments indicates that the majority of preschool children attend the playgroup until 1:00pm, with parents paying the additional £20 per week (83%; n10). None of the pre-preschool children attend the playgroup five days a week, with the majority attending two days (69%; n11). One child attends one day a week and four children attend four days. The playgroup’s busiest days are Monday – Wednesday. All of the pre-preschool children attend from 9:00am – 1:00pm. Three children currently attending playgroup are from a minority ethnic background (11%). Table 2.4 illustrates comparative preschool enrolments at nearby playgroup facilities. Providers accept children prior to their preschool year and have succeeded in attracting a higher proportion of children with funded places, in comparison to Richmount Playgroup.
Table 2.4 Local Playgroup Preschool Enrolments
Provider Total children enrolled (n)
Preschool children in funded place
n %
Apple Blossom Playgroup 15 15 100
Loughgall Playgroup 20 16 80
Orchard Preschool 15 15 100
Peatlands Playgroup 20 20 100
Richmount Playgroup 21 13 62
14 | P a g e
2.4 Core Catchment Areas
Postcode Analysis of Richmount Primary School and Playgroup users has been undertaken to identify catchment areas for the facilities. Travel distance and household clustering will help us determine the key geographies that may be interested in future childcare provision. 2.4.1 Travel Distance Postcode analysis of Richmount Primary School pupils’ home address, indicates that 80 households were represented in 2017/18 enrolment figures. Figure 2.2 indicates that although 44% of pupil households were located one mile or less from the school, 17.5% of households lived four or more miles away. The average travel distance was 2.1 miles and the maximum distance travelled was six miles. Postcode analysis of Richmount Playgroup enrolments (n23) that the average travel distance was 2.6 miles. Although the majority of users live within one mile of the playgroup, a higher proportion of users travelled over 5 miles in comparison to the school user group.
Figure 2.2 Richmount Primary School and Playgroup Household Travel Distances
2.4.2 Household Clustering
Scotch Street Settlement Area is located within the larger The Birches 1 Super Output Area (SOA). However, it also borders The Birches 2, Ballybay, Loughgall 1, Hockley, Charlemont and Ballyoran SOAs. Postcode analysis of Richmount Primary School enrolment data 2017/18 indicates that 35% (n28) of pupil households are located within the Scotch Street Settlement
44
7
22.5
912.5
5
35
4
22
13 139
4
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
<1 1 to 2 2 to 3 3 to 4 4 to 5 5 to 6 6+
% H
ou
seh
old
s
Travel Distance (Miles)
Household Travel Distance
Richmount Primary School Richmount Playgroup
15 | P a g e
boundary (i.e. within Small Area N00002369 and N00002370 of The Birches 1 SOA). However, a comparatively lower proportion of playgroup households are based within the village boundaries (22%; n5). Table 2.5 indicates that although 58% of primary school households are located within the The Birches 1 SOA, a further 22% are located in Loughgall SOA and there is reach into Portadown and Moy – although to a lesser extent.
Table 2.5 2017/18 Richmount Primary School Enrolment * Household Location
Users Household
Small Area SOA Scotch Street Settlement (n) % (n) %
1 1 1 1 N0000370 Charlemont 95CC05005 N
1 1 1 1 N0000396 Hockley 95CC10W1 N
8 7 5 6 N0000425 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
7 6 5 6 N0000427 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
2 2 2 2 N0000428 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
10 8 6 7 N0000429 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
4 3 3 4 N00002189 Ballybay 95LL03W1 N
3 2 2 2 N00002196 Ballyoran 95LL04W1 N
4 3 3 4 N00002197 Ballyoran 95LL04W1 N
4 3 2 2 N00002213 Brownstown 1 95LL06S1 N
2 2 1 1 N00002300 Kernan 1 95LL16S1 N
7 6 5 6 N00002368 The Birches 1 N
10 8 5 6 N00002369 The Birches 1 N
37 31 26 33 N00002369 The Birches 1 Y
2 2 2 2 N00002370 The Birches 1 Y
12 10 7 9 N00002370 The Birches 1 N
4 3 2 2 N00002371 The Birches 1 N
2 2 1 1 N00002372 The Birches 2 N
1 1 1 1 N00002375 The Birches 2 N
121 100 80 100
Table 2.6 indicates that although 39% (n9) of playgroup households are located within The Birches 1 SOA, a further 12% (n3) are located in Loughgall SOA and there is reach into The Birches 2, Killyman, Ballyoran and Hockley. However, as the overall number of enrolments are small, caution should be exercised when interpreting this data.
16 | P a g e
Table 2.6 2017/18 Richmount Playgroup Enrolment * Household Location
Users/Household Small Area SOA
Scotch Street Settlement (n) (%)
1 4 396 Hockley 95CC10W1 N
1 4 395 Hockley 95CC10W1 N
1 4 425 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
1 4 429 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
1 4 427 Loughgall 95CC15W1 N
1 4 2181 Annagh 1 95LL02S1 N
1 4 2195 Ballybay 95LL03W1 N
1 4 2196 Ballyoran 95LL04W1 N
1 4 2197 Ballyoran 95LL04W1 N
1 4 2277 Drumgor 2 95LL13S2 N
7 30 2369 Birches 1 Y
2 9 2371 Birches 1 N
2 9 2374 Birches 2 N
2 9 2880 Killyman (95OO17W1) N
23 100
Seven households had one or more children at both the Playgroup and the Primary School. Removal of duplicate households from the dataset (n96) confirms that the core catchment area lies within The Birches 1 SOA (56%; n54). However, due to the rurality of the surrounding locality, the analysis suggests that Loughgall SOA (19%; n18) is a strong secondary catchment area.
2.5 Discussion
The Scotch Street area has grown substantially over the last ten years, with a variety of new housing developments and supporting infrastructure established. Both the playgroup and the school show a steady growth in terms of enrolments and user profiles reflect the numbers of economic migrants who have settled in the area to work in surrounding farms and factories near Dungannon and Portadown. Although there are some alternative rural providers, Richmount primary school and playgroup provide an important role in providing essential services for residents living within Scotch Street and surrounding rural community. On average parents are travelling 2-3 miles to use these facilities. Whilst the playgroup has been successful in attracting pre-preschool children, there is a lesser proportion using the facilities during their preschool year. Discussions with staff suggest that parents who do not intend to send their children to Richmount Primary School are enrolling in preschools nearer to alternative primary school provision. This is an issue which needs explored as preschool funding is an important income stream for the playgroup and means the service can work to fulltime capacity.
17 | P a g e
3. DETERMINANTS OF CHILDCARE DEMAND
3.1. Introduction
This chapter sets the current research within the context of wider population trends. It examines the availability of registered childcare provision within the area and highlights other factors which may impact upon the need for childcare.
3.2. Population Trends
Mid-Year population estimates indicate a 10% population growth across Northern Ireland between 2011 and 2016. During this period The Birches 1 SOA has shown significant population growth of 46% (from 1,507 in 2011 to 2,199 in 2016). However, when we look at the SA statistics for the Scotch Street area, population growth is estimated at 68% (from 747 in 2011 to 1,254 in 2016).16 Over the period (2016-2026), the population of Northern Ireland is projected to increase by 4.2% (n77,574), reaching 1,939,724 by 2026.17 However, the 0-14 year old population will remain stable, with increases reflected in the over 65 age group. Sub-national projections completed in 2014 indicate that SHSCT area will experience a higher rate of population growth than the NI average. Additionally, whereas the SHSCT 0-4 population is estimated to remain relatively stable, the 5-14 age group is estimated to increase by 14% (n7,156).18
Improvements to the housing infrastructure will cater for current demand and attract newcomers into the Scotch Street vicinity. For example, there are proposals for 16 new dwellings on land between 112 and 114 Moy Road and to the rear of 22-23 Timakeel Lodge19 and a further housing development at 1-3 Richmount Road for 20 dwellings is under consideration by Planning. 20 Additionally, 12 acres within the Scotch Street development limit and zoned for Development is currently for sale at 118 Moy Road, three further lots of associated development/agricultural land have been sold, with permission for 12 dwellings for Phase One granted and currently under construction (submitted Mountfield Housing Development Concept Plan indicates 33 dwellings).
3.3. Registered Childcare Places
As highlighted in the previous chapter, there is evidence of unmet need relating to registered childcare places within the SHSCT area, particularly with regards to school age (5-14 years) childcare provision. Therefore, intervention to meet current and projected demand may be required.
16 https://www.nisra.gov.uk/publications/2016-mid-year-population-estimates-small-areas 17 https://www.nisra.gov.uk/publications/2016-based-population-projections-northern-ireland 18 https://www.nisra.gov.uk/publications/2014-based-population-projections-areas-within-northern-ireland 19 LA08/2017/1366/F 20 LA08/2016/1381/O
18 | P a g e
Registered childcare provision within a three mile radius of Richmount Primary School/Playgroup was identified.21 This was supplemented with childcare provision within a three mile radius of the identified “feeder areas” within the Loughgall SOA. Table 3.1 illustrates that there are an estimated 433 places for 0-4 year olds and 189 places for 5-11 year olds within the locality. However, provision is primarily located around the fringes of Portadown.
Table 3.1 Registered Childcare Provision – 3 mile radius
Provider Total Providers
Places
0 to 4 years 5 to 11 years
Childminder 44 139 109
Playgroup 9 235 0
Creche 2 17 0
Day Nursery 1 42 0
Out of Schools 3 0 80
Total 59 433 189
Within Birches 1 SOA childcare provision is limited to childminders and Richmount Playgroup. There are 37 childcare places for 0-4 year olds, but only 14 childminder places for 5-11 year olds (see Table 3.2). However, the Loughgall SOA benefits from three playgroups and an Out of Schools provision, with 96 places for 0-4 year olds and 39 places for 5-11 year olds.
Table 3.2 Registered Childcare Provision in Birches 1 and Loughgall SOAs
Provider
Birches 1 SOA Loughgall SOA
Total Providers
0 to 4 years
5 to 11 years
Total Providers
0 to 4 years
5 to 11 years
Childminder 5 14 14 7 21 19
Playgroup 1 23 0 3 75 0
Creche 0 0 0 0 0 0
Day Nursery 0 0 0 0 0 0
Out of Schools 0 0 0 1 0 20
Total 6 37 14 11 96 39
However, the Loughgall SOA benefits from three playgroups and an Out of Schools provision, with 96 places for 0-4 year olds and 39 places for 5-11 year olds.
21 http://www.familysupportni.gov.uk
19 | P a g e
3.4. Registered Childcare Cost
Table 3.3 compares playgroup/preschool provision in the immediate area, with Orchard Preschool and Apple Blossom playgroup located within primary school grounds.
Table 3.3 Pre-School Childcare Provision and Cost
Provider Location Age Range Morning Hours
Afternoon Hours
Cost per child per hour
Richmount Playgroup
Scotch Street 2 years 10 months – 4 years
9:00-1:00pm
- £3:00
Peatlands Playgroup
The Birches 2 years 10 months – 4 years
8:45am- 12:45pm
• - £3:00
Apple Blossom Playgroup
St John’s Primary School, Eglish
2 years 10 months – 4 years
9:15am-12:15pm
- £2:33
Loughgall Playgroup
Loughgall 2 years 10 months – 4 years
9:00am-12:00pm
- £3:33
Orchard County Nursery Unit
Orchard County Primary School, Loughgall
3-4 years 9:00am-12:00pm
- -
Orchard Preschool
St Oliver Plunkett Primary School, Ballyhegan
2 years 10 months – 4 years
9:00am-12:00pm
- 12:00-1:45pm
£2:00 £2:50 lunch provided
Table 3.4 indicates that there is limited After School Club provision in the immediate area, with both Richmount Primary School and Orchard Preschool charging roughly £1:00 per child, per hour.
20 | P a g e
Table 3.4 After School Club Childcare Provision
Provider Location Age Afternoon Hours
Cost per child
Richmount Primary School After Schools
Richmount Primary School
P1-3 1:50-2:40pm £1:00
Orchard After Schools
St Oliver Plunkett Primary School, Ballyhegan
P1-7 2:00-5:30pm £3.50 per child £6:00 for 2 £8:50 for 3
As with Richmount After Schools Club, Orchard After School compliments St Oliver Plunkett Primary School hours. However, unlike Richmount it opens for longer, caters for P1-7 and is available to children from different schools. Different session lengths also provide flexibility for parents (i.e. 2:00-3:00pm; 3:00-5:30pm; 2:00-5:30pm).
Childminder operating times provide even greater levels of flexibility with registered childminders based within 2 miles of Scotch Street charging £3:50-£4:00 per child per hour.22 Private Day Nurseries in Portadown provide childcare places after a child’s first immunisations, Monday to Friday from 7:00am – 6:00pm. Childcare costs around £170 per child per week. After School provision costs around £23 per afternoon including school collections.
3.5. Determinants of Demand
The demand for childcare is complex and driven by a range of factors to include, child population, availability of informal/unpaid carers, the number of mothers returning to work and the length of time on maternity and availability of flexible working patterns.
3.5.1 Childcare Places by Population
The 2011 census provides a breakdown of the population by age. Table 3.5 illustrates the number of childcare places available in The Birches 1 SOA, against the child population. This analysis indicates fewer childcare places for 0-4 year olds than the NI average and although 5-12 year olds are slightly better catered for, there are 15 children to each childcare place for this age group.
Table 3.5 Registered Childcare Provision in Birches 1 SOA by Child Population
22 www.childcare.co.uk
21 | P a g e
Age Group Childcare Places
The Birches 1 SOA Population (n)
The Birches 1 SOA Child to Childcare Place Ratio
NI Child to Childcare Place Ratio
0-4 years 37 177 5:1 3:1
5-12 years 14 215 15:1 19:1
3.5.2 Ageing Population An ageing population may mean that grandparents and older family members are available to provide support with childcare. Thus reducing the need for formal arrangements. However, Figure 3.1 illustrates that The Birches 1 SOA has a relatively younger population than the NI average. Twelve percent (n265) of the 2016 population is estimated to be aged over 65 years. This is 4% lower than that of the comparative NI average.
Figure 3.1 The Birches 1 SOA Population
3.5.3 Minority Ethnic Population Research indicates that inward migration may mean that parents settling into an area may not have access to informal social networks that could provide childcare support. It is difficult to obtain relevant and up-to-date statistics for the Scotch Street area. However, Newcomer pupil enrolments at Richmount Primary School have increased
23
34
31
12
21
3132
16
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0-15 16-39 40-64 65+
%
Population Age Profile
The Birches 1 SOA NI
22 | P a g e
from 5% in 2014/15 to 12% in 2017/18. Most recently Bulgarian families have settled into the area, alongside an established Eastern European population. 2011 Census Country of Birth statistics illustrate that 90% (n1,019) of the Scotch Street population was born in NI, in comparison to the NI average of 89% (n 1,810,863). Figure 3.2 provides a breakdown for Scotch Street.23
Figure 3.2 Country of Birth
3.5.4 Household Composition and Labour Market Activity Forty-three percent of households in the Scotch Street Settlement Area have dependent children (56% of which are aged 0-4 years). This is higher than the NI average of 34% and 40% respectively. The proportion of residents who are economically inactive due to looking after the home or family in Scotch Street (3%) is lower than the NI average of 4%.24 2011 Census Statistics indicate that 12% of households in Scotch Street are lone parents with dependent children, compared to the NI average of 9%. Ninety-one percent (n21) of lone parent households in Scotch Street are female. Figure 3.2 illustrates that lone parents within the Scotch Street settlement area are more likely to be employed (78%) in comparison to the NI average (53%). Furthermore, almost 50% of lone parents are in full-time employment.
Figure 3.2 Lone Parent Households – Scotch Street
23 Country of Birth QS207NI 24 Economic Activity: KS601NI (Settlement 2015)
NI90%
ROI1%
Other Europe6%
Other1%
Other Uk2%
Country of Birth
23 | P a g e
3.6. Discussion
Statistics indicate a substantially greater increase in population within the wider Birches area and within Scotch Street in particular, when compared with NI as a whole. Examination of key indicators of demand (e.g. planned housing development, available childcare places, increasing child population, higher proportion of lone parents, economic migrants and working parents) does suggest there is scope for additional local child care services. Examination of existing community playgroup/preschool provision, whilst more affordable than private day nursery facilities, indicates potential difficulties for parents starting work earlier than 9:00am. The Orchard Preschool model may be worth further exploration within the context of the survey findings presented in Chapter Four.
31
22
47
30
48
22
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
In part-time employment In full-time employment Not in employment
%
Lone Parent Households (16-74 yrs) with Dependent Children
NI Scotch Street
24 | P a g e
4. PARENTS PERCEPTIONS OF LOCAL CHILDCARE
4.1 Introduction
This chapter presents the findings from community, school and playgroup-based surveys. Community surveys were distributed by fieldworkers during w/c 18-24 February 2018 to households in Stewart’s Terrace and the Keelmount and Timakeel developments (n196). Sixty-three valid responses (32%) were achieved during the two specified collections (23 of these were from parents of 0-12 year olds). Surveys were distributed to parents of children at Richmount Playgroup and Primary School (19 February – 16 March 2018). Sixteen valid responses were achieved from the playgroup (57%) and 47 from the school (59%).
4.2 Respondent Demographics
Overall, a total of 86 valid responses were submitted from parents with children aged 0-12 years. Ninety-three percent of the sample were female (n80). Overall, respondents had 162 children aged between 0-12 years, with an average of two children per family. Thirty-one percent of children within these households were aged 0-4 years (n51) and 69% aged 5-12 years (n111). Three percent of respondents stated that they had a child with Special Educational Needs (n3). Reflecting the relevantly recent housing expansion within Scotch Street, around half of the community-based respondents had lived in the area less than five years. Sixty-two percent (n39) of the playgroup and school respondents also lived in the Scotch Street area. Following the same trends as the postcode analysis, playgroup respondents (44%; n7) were less likely than school respondents (68%; n32) to live within the immediate area. Ninety-three percent (n80) of respondents identified as White British or Irish, with other ethnicities reported as Portuguese, Bulgarian, Polish and mixed race. The majority stated their community background as Protestant (77%; n66), 8% were of mixed religion or “other” religion (n7) and 7% were from a Catholic community background (n6).
4.3 Employment Status
Eighty-seven percent (n75) of the sample were employed. The majority of whom were employed full-time (64%; n48) and 36% were employed part-time (n27). Figure 4.1 illustrates that 9% of respondents were lone parents (n8), the majority of whom were in employment. Ninety-one percent of respondents lived as a couple (n78). The majority were couples within which both people worked (86%; n67).
25 | P a g e
Figure 4.1 Family Circumstances
Of those who provided details about where they worked, the majority were based in Portadown (32%; n12), Craigavon (16%; n6), Armagh (13%; n5) or worked from home (13%; n5).
Figure 4.2 Employment Location
1
12
78
8
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Couple, notworking
Couple, oneworking
Couple, twoworking
Lone parent,working
Lone parent, notworking
%Family Circumstances
Birches2%
Portadown32%
Loughgall2%
Craigavon16%
Lurgan2%
Armagh13%
Tandragee2%
Home13%
Newry3%
Dungannon6%
Lisburn3%
Belfast6%
Employment Location
26 | P a g e
4.4 Use of Childcare Provision
Fifty-six percent of respondents (n39) completing community and school surveys reported getting help with childcare provision. The majority of provision (56%; n22) was unpaid. When we take into account that some respondents availed of both paid and unpaid support, 77% of respondents received some form of unpaid childcare and 42% paid for at least a proportion of the childcare received.
Figure 4.3 Paying for Childcare
Table 4.1 illustrates that the majority of childcare is provided by family or friends (predominately grandparents), followed by After School provision. Providers are largely based in Portadown or Scotch Street. The analysis indicates that parents of 5-12 year olds largely rely on family, childminders and After School provision.
Table 4.1 Type of Childcare Provision
Type Childcare %
0-4 Years (n)
Average Hours p.w. per child
5-12 years (n)
Average Hours p.w. per child
Family/friends/partner/neighbour 61.5 17 14 35 9
After School 10.5 - - 8 4
Playgroup 8 4 13 - -
Registered childminder 8 2 10 4 17
Unregistered childminder 4 2 13 - -
Day Care 4 3 25 - -
Nursery attached to school 4 2 unknown - -
Paid only21%
Unpaid only56%
Paid & unpaid21%
Unknown2%
Is your childcare paid or unpaid?
27 | P a g e
4.5 Thoughts on Local Early Years Provision
Community and School-based respondents were asked to rate local provision for 0-4 year olds (the Playgroup sample were specifically asked to rate Richmount Playgroup – see Chapter 5). Figure 4.4 indicates that overall, quality and availability of places was rated more highly than operating times and affordability. Those completing the community-based surveys were less likely to rate availability of places, operating times and affordability as good, compared to the playgroup and school samples. However only 20% of the school sample rated the quality of local childcare provision for 0-4 years as good.
Figure 4.4 Rating of Local Childcare Provision (0-4 Years) as Good
“Usually [sessions are] 9-12. It’s hard to find anything affordable after 12.” [Female, working part-time] “My daughter did avail of [Richmount] playgroup prior to going to school as both parents work full-time. The opening hours were poor and we as parents had to take flexible working to accommodate this.” [Female, working full-time] “Unable to obtain childcare for mornings only during summer term. Difficulty at Easter, Christmas and staff development school days.” [Female, working full-time]
The community (28%; n5) and school-based (34%; n16) surveys indicated low use of Richmount Playgroup. Although some parents reported that the playgroup hadn’t been opened when their child needed it, or that they had recently moved to the area, in other cases parents had specifically chosen another provider.
“They went do different playgroup as I couldn’t get childcare to suit my working hours at Richmount.” [Female, working full-time]
29
2118
33
0
13 14
71
40
2519 20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Available Places Operating Times Affordability Quality
% G
oo
d
Local Early Years Provision - Good
Total Community School
28 | P a g e
“Used registered childminder at time more suitable.” [Female, working full-time]
“Opening times didn’t suit working hours.” [Female, working full-time]
“No one to lift the child from playgroup at that closing time.” [Female, working full-time] “Grandparents live close to Seagoe PS.” [Female, working full-time]
4.6 Thoughts on School Age Provision
Respondents were asked to rate local provision for 5-11 year olds. Figure 4.5 indicates similar trends to those of the younger age group with parents rating the quality of local provision more highly than operating times, affordability and available places.
Figure 4.5 Rating of Local Childcare Provision (5-11 Years)
Although some parents were pleased with their childcare arrangements, particularly those using childminders, others had little knowledge of what was available and had found it difficult to source childcare that complimented school and work. “It took me ages to find suitable childminder willing to pick up from Richmount Primary School.” [Female, working full-time] “My childminder is brilliant, just not much availability in the area.” [Female, working full-time] “I would like [Richmount] after schools club to last longer hours (e.g. 5pm).” [Female, working full-time]
1922
1823
49
38
47
70
32
4035
7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Available Places Operating Times Affordability Quality
%
Rating of Childcare Provision 5-11 years
Good OK Poor
29 | P a g e
4.7 Discussion
The survey sample largely reflects wider census demographics which show relatively high levels of employment, particularly amongst females and lone parents. The survey also indicated that many parents had recently settled into the area and that some were born outside of Northern Ireland. Although family, friends and informal networks provided a significant proportion of (unpaid) childcare, 21% of respondents reported reliance on solely paid childcare provision. Provision was mostly based in Scotch Street or in Portadown. Parents working in town felt Portadown offered more options, when compared to the local area. Those who had younger children mostly used family, childminders and playgroups and those with older children followed the same pattern (supplementing playgroups with after schools). The use of family and childminders was believed to offer greater flexibility in terms of dropping-off and collections. School and playgroup choice clearly being driven by the location of the chosen provider. Local operating hours, affordability and to some extent availability of places were not rated highly.
30 | P a g e
5. RICHMOUNT PLAYGROUP USERS
5.1. Introduction
This chapter examines survey feedback from parents using Richmount Playgroup. The analysis focuses upon satisfaction with the current childcare provision and explores potential interest in extending the playgroup operating times.
5.2. Rating of Richmount Playgroup Provision
Figure 5.1 illustrates that parents with children attending Richmount Playgroup were more likely to provide more positive ratings than those provided for local childcare in general. However, only 63% of users (n10) rated operating times as Good. Fifty-six percent (n9) rated affordability as Good. “Maybe an earlier opening time would benefit people working 9-2 or 9-5 etc. To be able to drop-off and go on to work.” [Female, working full-time]
Figure 5.1 Rating of Richmount Playgroup Provision as Good
Parents typically sent their children to the playgroup for eight or 20 hours per week, the former reflecting younger children and the latter reflecting funded pre-school beneficiaries.
5.3. Use of Additional Childcare Provision
Seventy-five percent (n12) of parents using Richmount Playgroup also used another form of childcare. Half of these parents reported that their additional childcare was
81
63
56
94
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Available Places Operating Times Affordability Quality
% G
oo
d
Rating of Richmount Playgroup Provision
31 | P a g e
unpaid (50%; n4), 37% stated that it was paid (n6) and 13% used paid and unpaid sources (n2).
Figure 5.2 Richmount Playgroup – Additional Childcare Costs
Table 5.1 illustrates that the majority of parents using the playgroup also received additional childcare from family or friends (47%; n7) or a registered childminder (40%; n6). Specified locations were Portadown, Scotch Street, Annaghmore, Dungannon and Gilford.
Table 5.1 Types of Additional Childcare Used by Richmount Playgroup Parents
Type Additional Childcare%
0-4 Years (n)
Average Hours p.w. per child
5-11 years (n)
Average Hours p.w. per child
Family/friends/partner/neighbour
47 11 12 8 16
Registered childminder
40 8 21 4 21.5
Unregistered childminder
6.5 2 15 - -
After Schools 6.5 - - 1 unknown
5.4. Interest in Longer Operating Hours
Sixty-nine percent of respondents using the playgroup (n11) stated that if the playgroup opened earlier, they would use this service. The majority reported that they would prefer an 8:00am start (77%; n10), two people preferred 7:00am and one person preferred 8:30am. Sixty-nine percent (n9) reported interest in leaving their children in earlier for five days a week, 23% for two days (n3) and 8% for one day only (n1).
Paid only37%
Unpaid only50%
Paid & unpaid
13%
Is your Childcare Paid or Unpaid?
32 | P a g e
Figure 5.3 Interest in Earlier Opening Times
Figure 5.4 indicates that parents had greatest interest in earlier opening times on Monday-Friday, mirroring the busiest days for Richmount Playgroup.
Figure 5.4 Preferred Use of Earlier Opening Times
Less than half of respondents using the playgroup (44%; n7) stated they would use the service later in the day. A closing time of 3:00pm (36%; n4) or 5pm (36%; n4) was preferred, one person preferred 2:00pm, one preferred 4:00pm and one person preferred 6:00pm. Ninety-one percent (n10) of those expressing an interest in leaving their children in later wished to use this service for five days a week, one person thought they would use the service on three days.
Yes69%
Maybe19%
No12%
Would you use the Playgroup before 9am?
8592 92
77
69
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
%
Preferred Use
33 | P a g e
Figure 5.5 Interest in Later Closing Times
Fifty percent of those using the playgroup were in receipt of a funded pre-school place (n8). Half of those with a younger child planned to continue to send them to Richmount Playgroup during their pre-school year, the remainder planned to send them to an alternative provider (two to Orchard County nursery and two to Peatlands Playgroup). These parents planned to send their children to Orchard County Primary School and the Birches Primary School. “Closer to grandparents for collection.” [Female, working part-time] “Closer to home, starts earlier.” [Female, working full-time]
5.5. Discussion
The majority of Richmount Playgroup parents rated the quality of provision as Good, however, operating ours and affordability followed the same trends as the school and community samples. The findings illustrate that parents of younger children, not in receipt of funding do not use the playgroup full-time. The majority of parents supplement the playgroup provision with additional childcare – over one third of which is paid only. Currently the parents of 10 children of playgroup age use childminders for an average of 18 hours a week per child. The evidence suggests that most parents would use the playgroup if it opened earlier, potentially at 8am. Afternoon provision was requested by almost half of the respondents, although they were split between 3:00pm and 5:00pm closing time. Monday – Wednesday were the most popular days for both early and late opening. Responses also indicate that parental use of Richmount Playgroup in the pre-school year is affected by Primary School choice, with selection outside Scotch Street
Yes44%
Maybe38%
No18%
Would you use the playgroup if it closed after 1pm?
34 | P a g e
prompting a move in the pre-school year. Thus wrap around childcare provision in the vicinity is important to the sustainability of both the playgroup and the school.
35 | P a g e
6. SUPPORT FOR OUT OF SCHOOLS PROVISION
6.1. Introduction
This chapter examines potential interest in developing out of school provision for 5-11 year olds in the Scotch Street area, based upon the survey analysis.
6.2. Choice of Primary School
Residents and Richmount Primary School users were asked to provide details on their chosen or preferred Primary School. Figure 6.1 indicates that the majority of parents had chosen Richmount Primary School (38%; n15). This was followed by The Birches Primary School (18%; n7) and Orchard County Primary School, Loughgall (10%; n4).
Figure 6.1 Chosen Primary School
Richmount Primary School was chosen due to proximity to home, family connections and high standard of education. However, two parents had not been able to get their child accepted at Orchard County Primary School and Richmount had been their second choice. Eighty-five percent of Richmount Primary School parents stated that it was their closet primary school (n40).
3
3
18
3
5
10
5
5
8
2
38
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Armstrong
Ballyoran
Birches
Hart Memorial
Millington
Orchard County
Seagoe
St John the Baptist
The Cope
Uk
Richmount
%
Chosen Primary School
36 | P a g e
Parents of children at Richmount Playgroup (75%; n12) were more likely than the community sample (13.5%; n3) to choose Richmount Primary School. Figure 6.2 illustrates that 35% of the Scotch Street community sample (n8) have chosen schools located in Portadown (i.e. Ballyoran, Hart Memorial, Seagoe, St John the Baptist). However, The Birches, and Loughgall based Orchard County and The Cope are the strongest single competitors. Within the Playgroup sample, Richmount Primary School’s greatest competitor is The Birches Primary School.
Figure 6.2 Chosen Primary School by Sample25
Further exploration as to why other primary schools are chosen, specifically amongst Scotch Street residents reflects the fact that the new housing developments have attracted people from outside the area. “Child attended [St John the Baptist] before we moved here.” “Used to live in Annaghmore and stayed with [Orchard County].” There are also family connections to specific rural schools and parents are continuing with the tradition. However, when examined further, the proximity of grandparents to a specific school and ease of childcare arrangements appears to be an important driver of choice. “Close to town so easier to get someone to pick-up or drop-off child in school when I need it.” [Millington Primary School] “Close to grandparents.” [St John the Baptist Primary School]
25 Percentages affected by rounding
4 4
17
49
13.59 9
13.54
13.519
6
75
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
%
Chosen Primary School Breakdown
Community Playgroup
37 | P a g e
“Grandparents already do lifts from this school so would be handier & save myself having to take time out of work.” [Orchard County Primary School] “Grandparents live beside.” [Seagoe Primary School] “Registered childminder lived locally and rest of children attended Seagoe School. Also has a provision for early and after school childcare.” [Seagoe Primary School] “Good after schools.” [Hart Memorial Primary School]
6.3. Support for Out of School Provision in Scotch Street
Scotch Street households with no children in the 0-12 age group were asked if they would be supportive of a new Out of School scheme in the area. Forty residents responded and 75% (n30) gave their full support (17.5% (n7) reported “maybe” and were not supportive of the scheme (7.5%; n3). Figure 6.3 indicates that the majority of parents responding to the community, school and playgroup surveys supported the opening of an Out of Schools scheme in Scotch Street (59%; n50), with a further 34% (n29) reporting “maybe.” Parents who didn’t support the scheme felt that they did not need additional childcare and would not use it themselves.
Figure 6.3 Parental Support for an Out of School Scheme in Scotch Street
Figure 6.4 indicates that parents may be more likely to use After Schools (46%; n39) provision in comparison to a Breakfast Club (27.5%; n23).
Yes59%
Maybe34%
No7%
Would you be supportive of an out of school scheme opening in Scotch Street?
38 | P a g e
Figure 6.4 Potential Use of Out of Schools Provision
6.4. Preferred Use of Out of School Provision
Although overall demand is less, Figure 6.5 indicates that there is slightly higher need for breakfast club provision at the beginning of the week, this is similar to Richmount Playgroup parents’ preferences. However, the survey results suggest greater need for after school provision on Mondays, Wednesdays and Thursdays.
Figure 6.5 Preferred Use of Out of Schools Provision
Figure 6.6 indicates that most parents expressing interest in Out of Schools provision, require it for five days. This is specifically the case for those requiring before school provision (70%; n28). Although the overall numbers requiring after schools provision is higher, just under half require it Monday – Friday (47%; n28).
27.5
39
33.5
46
30.5
23.5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Yes Maybe No
%Would you use a Breakfast or Afterschools Club?
Breakfast After School
8783 84
79 7974
69
82
7369
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
%
Preferred Use of Out of School Provision
Breakfast After School
39 | P a g e
Figure 6.6 Number of Days Required
The majority of those requiring morning provision requested an 8:00am opening (48%; n25).
Figure 6.7 Preferred Breakfast Club Start Time
Figure 6.8 indicates that parents would prefer a 5:00pm (62%; n37) or to a lesser extent, a 6:00pm (35%; n21) closing time.
7.5
15
7.5
70
4
1620
13
47
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 day 2 days 3 days 4 days 5 days
%Number of Days Required
Breakfast Afterschool
7:00am19%
7:30am33%
8:00am48%
Preferred Breakfast Club Opening
40 | P a g e
Figure 6.8 Preferred After School Club Closing Time
Six parents with children attending other schools (i.e. Ballyoran, The Birches, The Cope, Orchard County and Millington) stated that they would require transport from the Breakfast Club to school and 14 parents reported the need for transport to the After School Club (i.e. Ballyoran, The Birches, The Cope, Orchard County, St John the Baptist, Seagoe and Millington).
6.5. Interest in a Holiday Club
There was also interest in additional holiday provision with just under half of parents expressing a firm interest (46%; n39).
Figure 6.9 Interest in Holiday Club
16.5 16.5
62
35
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
3pm 4pm 5pm 6pm
%Preferred Afterschool Closing Time
46
41
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Yes Maybe No
%
Would you be interested in using a Holiday Club?
41 | P a g e
Parents were most interested in having childcare provision during the summer holidays (48%; n66), with a lesser degree of interest at Half-term (23%; n31), Easter (18%; n25) and Christmas (11%; n15). “It would save leave for other holiday times and allow the kids to socialise more over the summer as they miss school.”
6.6. Benefit of Out of School Provision
Table 6.1 indicates that 42% of parents (completing the survey reported that additional out of schools provision would enable them to keep on working (n36), with a further 27% (n23) reporting that it would enable them to increase their hours at work and 8% (n7) reporting that they would be able to look for employment. “I could change my working hours to start earlier.” “I would be able to seek permanent employment as I temp for the Health Trust to suit children's holidays/term times.” Twenty-four percent of the sample (n21) did not intend to use the additional provision and stated that it wouldn’t make any difference to them. “The Cope offers an after schools club as does St Oliver Plunkett’s via Orchard pre-school so it’s unlikely I would use Richmount.”
Table 6.1 Benefit of Out of School Provision in Scotch Street
Benefit % Agree
I/my partner will be able to keep on working 42
I/my partner will be able to increase my hours of work 27
I/my partner will be able to look for a job 8
I/my partner will be able to undertake training 2
It wouldn’t make any difference 24
Additional benefits were provided by respondents. These mostly included helping to take the pressure off family and friends providing informal childcare.
“At the moment I had to cut my hours to be able to bring my child to school. Also I had to ask family/friends to collect children them afterwards and look after them until I finish work.” “It would relieve grandparents from providing childcare.” Figure 6.10 indicates that 69% of parents (n59) felt the introduction of extended Out of School provision in Scotch Street would make Richmount Primary School a more attractive option for parents.
42 | P a g e
Figure 6.10 Complementarity of Out of School Provision to Richmount Primary School
“My children and I would support this out of school option. My children enjoy living and going to school in the local area. It would be peace of mind for me and I know the children would be content.” “It would be great to leave your child until 5:00pm in good hands and the kids would be able to play with kids their own age.” “A breakfast club would be a great idea and evening club as not all working parents start work at 9am. I start work at 8am and it can be difficult to get a child place at 7:30 in the morning.” “Town schools appear to offer more provision for children/working parents which is good to develop the social skills of children. My child attends local youth club and loves this. Large numbers of local children attend which proves there is a need in this area.” However, there was caution from a small number of parents regarding affordability of any future provision. Additionally one local childminder was concerned about the service having a negative impact on business. “It all depends on the cost. If cost is too expensive parents won’t be able to afford it. If priced well I’m sure it will be well used.” “I am a registered childminder living in Scotch Street area. I currently have places available PT and offer after school care with pick-up and summer holiday minding also. I feel funding towards a play park would be much better, or an open space for ball games as MUGA is too isolated. It has taken me a while to build up my childminding business and all the parents are very happy with the service I provide.”
Yes69%
Maybe29%
No2%
Would Out of School Provision make Richmount Primary School a more attractive choice for parents?
43 | P a g e
6.7. Discussion
There was a high level of community and parental support for the introduction of Out of School provision in Scotch Street. Proximity and convenience to childcare provision is a driver in school choice. Therefore, Richmount Primary School could potentially benefit from additional services. The Birches, The Cope and Orchard County are key rural competitors, alongside schools located in Portadown. Unlike the playgroup sample, parents of school age children were most likely to use the After School rather than Breakfast Club. However, there were similarities, with parents also requesting Breakfast Club opening from 8:00am and After School Club closure at 5:00pm. The majority of parents who reported that they would use the scheme also wanted childcare for five days a week. Monday – Wednesday were the most popular days for the Breakfast Club (as with the playgroup) and Monday, Wednesday and Thursday were the most popular days for the After School Club. There was strong interest in holiday provision, particularly during the summer holidays. Parents with children attending schools outside the area also expressed interest in using the scheme and reported the need for transport to and from school.
44 | P a g e
7. FUTURE SERVICE DEVELOPMENT
7.1 Introduction
This chapter highlights key points arising from the desk research and parental survey findings. It places these within the Minimum Standards and Implementation Guidance for Sessional and Full Day Care and provides options for RRCA Committee member consideration.
7.2 Headline Issues
The current study confirms Committee member concerns that the existing childcare provision does not meet the needs and lifestyle of the existing and future Scotch Street population. It highlights the interdependence between Richmount Playgroup and Richmount Primary School in terms of sustainability of services within this rural community. The ability to meet parental childcare needs and provide them with convenience, affordability and peace of mind is critical to both facilities survival. This Playgroup- School-Community relationship needs more thought and promotion. Whilst the majority of those using the Playgroup and Primary School are located within Scotch Street, the community and playgroup findings indicate drift towards alternative providers, particularly during the important preschool year. Unlike pre-preschool children, those of preschool age receive Education Authority funding on a consistent Monday – Friday basis and therefore should be the backbone of any proposition. Currently, the playgroup attracts a higher level of pre-preschool children. These parents typically use the playgroup for two days a week and although Monday – Wednesday are the busiest days, this uncertainty means that staff to child ratio is often not at its most profitable level. Scotch Street is a relatively new and young population, with parents relocating from Portadown and surrounding rural areas. The community benefits from a high employment rate, with grandparents and other family members providing a flexible and free of cost alternative to address restricted playgroup opening hours and more expensive private day nurseries. Many of whom may still live in outlying neighbourhoods and have strong influence over selection. At the moment the playgroup and the school are not at maximum capacity. However, some other local providers are. The survey findings indicate that the 9:00am opening for the playgroup is inconvenient for working parents and means that childminder provision may be a better option for them. Similarly, there was also a strong desire for the current after school club for younger children, whilst well used and valued, to be extended.
45 | P a g e
7.3 Minimum Standards
The Minimum Standards for Child Minding and Day Care aims to ensure quality childcare for all who use registered services.26 Each Health and Social Care Trust (HSCT) has an Early Years Team that registers and inspects childminding and day care services for children under 12 years. The three categories of childcare settings that are required to register are childminders, full day care and sessional day care. A Holiday Scheme provides care for school age children only during the school holidays and may operate with a maximum of 30 children. The distinction between full and sessional day care is important as it has important operational implications. Full day care is targeted at children aged 0-12 years for a period of four or more hours a day in non-domestic premises. Sessional day care includes playgroups (maximum 26 places), out of school clubs, schools providing breakfast clubs and wrap around care that is additional to statutory education provision and is open for two or more hours on any day. If childcare provision is less than two hours per day, registration is not required. The maximum places that an Out of School can be registered is 30. A Holiday Scheme provides care for school age children only during the school holidays and may operate with a maximum of 30 children. A Holiday Club can share registration with an After Schools and can operate full time during the holidays. If a setting provides more than one type of service (e.g. playgroup in the morning and out of school club in the afternoon), each type of session will require a separate registration unless the leader remains the same for both. There must be a minimum of 30 minutes between sessions when different children attend. Table 7.1 summarises key differences between sessional and full day care settings and highlights potential considerations/constraints that need to be taken into account if a new After School and/or Breakfast Club is to be introduced.
26 The Minimum Standards for Child Minding and Day Care of Children Aged under 12 (2012)
46 | P a g e
Table 7.1 Summary of Differences in Minimum Standards Requirements
Standard Sessional Care Full Day Care
Quality of Care
S1 Safeguarding & child protection
Named individual as Designated Officer for Safeguarding & Child Protection
Member of staff as Designated Officer for Safeguarding & Child Protection
S5 Food & drink No requirement to provide non-dairy protein
Requirement to provide non-dairy protein
Quality of Staffing, Management & Leadership
S11 Organisation of the setting
Registered person can be counted in staff to child ratios
Supernumerary manager if registered for over 20 children
1:8 adult to child ratio (4 or less children <3 years) 1:4 adult to child ratio (more than 4 children <3 years)
School age children (4th birthday before July 1st) must be catered for in separate rooms than non-school age children
Upper age limit for registration is 30th June in the academic year in which child reaches 12 years.
One staff member can collect children from school. All contracted services including drivers, cooks etc. must be vetted in line with the Regional Vetting Procedure.
Quality of Physical Environment
S14 Physical environment
2-12 years = 2.3m sq per child
2-5 years = 2.8m sq per child
- Soft seating/rest area
- Staff Room
- Office area
- Kitchen
- Staff toilet
7.4 Options and Implications
The survey findings give rise to a number of considerations for the future development of childcare provision in Scotch Street. Although there are a few different potential configurations, the following options would appear the most viable for RRCA exploration:
Option 1: Do Nothing This option reflects the status quo, with Richmount Playgroup operating 9:00am – 1:00pm Monday to Friday and Richmount Primary School continuing to provide an After School Club for P1-3 children only for one hour after school finishes. However, RRCA
47 | P a g e
through this research have established demand for earlier playgroup opening hours and later after schools provision.
Early Years Provision (0-4 years) Option 2: Partnership Working Between Rural Playgroups
There are a small number of sessional playgroups (2 years 11 months – 4 years) within the local area. This option would involve collaborative working between Richmount Playgroup and another provider, to offer an additional afternoon option for parents. Partners would continue to run four hour sessional day care. For example Provider 1 opens 8:00am – 12:00pm and has an afternoon session 12:30pm – 4:30pm for a different group of children. Provider 2 would run complementary sessions and children would be essentially “shared” between both facilities which would deliver an 8 hour childcare package. Transport between the facilities would be arranged during the required break. However, there is stiff competition between providers and there may be little scope for collaboration. Furthermore afternoon sessions may be less popular with parents, or they may not like the idea of using alternative providers. Option 3: Playgroup Moves to Full Day Care Registration This option would enable the Playgroup to extend the opening hours for the desired additional hour in the morning from 8:00am and provide childcare through until 5:30pm. However, Richmount Playgroup would need to change its sessional registration to full day care registration. This will have substantial operational and financial implications, predominately with the employment of a supernumerary manager who cannot be counted into staff to child ratios. Additionally, higher space standards will limit the number of registered places available from 24 to 19 (effectively losing £250 preschool income per week against increased wages). Furthermore parental interest in afternoon sessions may not be sufficient for income generation. Option 4: Playgroup Moves to Full Day Care Registration – Morning Only This option would enable the Playgroup to extend opening hours for the desired additional hour in the morning from 8:00am to 1:00pm. The demand for earlier opening hours, outstripped requests for extended afternoon provision, although this could potentially be kept under future review if full day care registration was achieved. However, opening for just one extra hour would entail Richmount Playgroup changing from sessional to full day care registration and although the research suggests parents would value and use an opening time, this may not be financially viable for the Playgroup.
48 | P a g e
Option 5: Preschool Breakfast Club Registration Option 5 would mean establishing and registering a sessional Breakfast Club from 8:00am to 9:30am at an alternative site with a different address from the Playgroup. Parents would then have the option of using Richmount Playgroup and remaining there until 1:30pm. This could eliminate the need for full day care registration and provide parents with greater flexibility. According to the guidelines, as the provision would be under two hours per day there would be no need to register.
School Age Provision (5-11 years)
Option 6: Sessional After School Club Provision Only
This option received strong support from both school and community-based respondents and one hour afternoon provision for P1-P3 pupils at Richmount Primary has already received uptake. Separate facilities from the playgroup are required and could possibly be catered for within the school estate, although run by an external provider. However, additional staff hours (1 adult to 8 children) and overheads would be incurred and as such would be more expensive than what parents are currently paying at the Primary School. Operation from 2:00pm to 6:00pm would require sessional, rather than full day care registration. As the After School would be based at a different site from the Playgroup a separate registration would be required. However, as times would not overlap the same staff could be used. Offering pick-ups from surrounding primary schools could help increase viability if adequate need was established.
The after school facility can be open all day during school vacation time and still fall under sessional day care requirements. However, caution should be applied if considering running a Holiday Club as it would not be financially viable if competing with local subsidised schemes.
Option 7: Sessional Breakfast and After School Club Provision
A Breakfast Club was not as popular as After School Provision and should not be considered as a standalone option. However, it would help working families with children attending Richmount Playgroup and Richmount Primary School who need an earlier drop-off time. Therefore it should be considered in conjunction with earlier opening times for the Playgroup and/or the After School Club if financially viable. It would not be considered feasible to offer transport from a Breakfast Club to other primary schools, although this could be monitored. Breakfast Club operation from 8:00am – 8:30am and After School times of 2:00pm - 5:30pm can come under the same sessional registration.
49 | P a g e
7.5 Suggested Way Forward
The following could be viable based upon the current demand. However, full cost and staffing implications must be taken into account.
1. Progress Out of School Provision This will require a new sessional registration for Out of Schools provision, spanning Breakfast Club (if deemed necessary) and After Schools provision for 5-11 year olds. It would require recruitment of staff (1 adult to 8 children) and potentially a transport service for the After Schools, in addition to securing a suitable facility (preferably Richmount Primary School) and appropriate checks and insurance.
2. Open Preschool Breakfast Club
This will require establishing a Breakfast Club separate to the Richmount Playgroup site for 1.5 hours and providing parents with the option of attending Richmount Playgroup for an additional four hours. If under 2 hours it won’t require an additional registration, although it may require a separate provider from the Playgroup. It will incur additional staffing hours. However, it is anticipated that this would be covered through additional demand and fees. This is considered to be the lowest risk method for extended childcare provision if it meets SHSST guidelines.
3. Full Day Care Registration – Morning Opening
If the Preschool Breakfast Club does not come to fruition RRCA should examine the impact of full day care registration. The need for a supernumerary manager and restriction on childcare places is likely to prohibit the cost of provision. If after careful analysis this is the preferred option, it is suggested that the most appropriate course of action may be to deliver full day care provision in conjunction with the After Schools (although separate registrations would be required as they will be held on different sites). In this instance, the supernumerary manager would be employed 8am-1pm Monday to Friday within the Playgroup. Within these hours they would be responsible for marketing and PR, rota development, staff mentoring/training, administration etc. for both the Playgroup and the After Schools. Having a supernumerary manager, may actually provide RRCA with a more strategic overview with regards to preschool and after school targeting and enrolment as well as increased efficiency.
7.6 Immediate Next Steps
The immediate next steps are for the RRCA Committee to consider the presented report and make an informed financial appraisal of full day care Playgroup and sessional
50 | P a g e
After School registration and delivery. Based upon this, future funding possibilities can be explored. Regardless of the route adopted, the following recommendations are made with regards to maximising Richmount Playgroup’s utilisation and profitability:
• There needs to be a higher level of cross-promotion between the playgroup and the primary school. The education and care package offered within the local vicinity from 2 years 10 months, through preschool until 11 years needs to be used as a selling point for both facilities. Details of these services should be featured on the respective websites, in order to increase enrolments for both. The Playgroup Facebook pages must focus on developing a sense of community between parents, potentially promoting RRCA activity, in order to build awareness and address identified social cohesion issues; and
• There must be a targeted and more aggressive promotional drive towards preschool recruitment, coming up to the September 2018 intake. Preschool places are the most profitable for the playgroup as they guarantee Monday – Friday income, as opposed to more sporadic pre-pre-school places.
