Scoot Biblio

21
A SCOOT Bibliography: This note consists of a list of all the known publications on SCOOT up to June 2006, the most recent are given first. The papers referred to in this document are split into four categories: 1. Results Papers (those containing results from trials) 2. Version Papers (those referring to specific versions of SCOOT etc.) 3. Overview Papers (those giving an overall description of SCOOT) 4. Other Papers Key Topics: o Bus Priority o Emissions o Gating o Congestion management / incident detection o ASTRID o Case Studies o Miscellaneous Results Papers: Benefits gained by responsive and traffic adaptive systems in Sao Paulo Mazamatti M, Netto D V V F, Vilanova L M, Ming S H 1998 Proceedings of the 8th International IEE Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring. The second assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen Taale H, Fransen W C M, Dibbits J 1998 Proceedings of the 8th International IEE Conference on Road Traffic Monitoring.

description

Bibliografia de avances realizados en el analisis de sistemas de gestion y control semaforico basados en SCOOT

Transcript of Scoot Biblio

  • A SCOOT Bibliography:

    This note consists of a list of all the known publications on SCOOT up to June 2006, the most recent are given first.

    The papers referred to in this document are split into four categories:1. Results Papers (those containing results from trials)2. Version Papers (those referring to specific versions of SCOOT etc.)3. Overview Papers (those giving an overall description of SCOOT)4. Other Papers Key Topics:

    o Bus Priorityo Emissionso Gatingo Congestion management / incident detectiono ASTRIDo Case Studieso Miscellaneous

    Results Papers:Benefits gained by responsive and traffic adaptive systems inSao Paulo

    Mazamatti M, Netto D V V F, Vilanova L M, Ming S H 1998

    Proceedings of the 8th International IEE Conference on RoadTraffic Monitoring.

    The second assessment of the SCOOT system in Nijmegen Taale H, Fransen W C M, Dibbits J 1998Proceedings of the 8th International IEE Conference on RoadTraffic Monitoring.

  • Some benefits of a SCOOT UTC system: an independentassessment by micro-simulation

    Fox k, Clark S, Bobby R, Montgomery F, Bell M 1998

    Traffic Engineering and Control September 1998

    Before / After Assessment: Intelligent Traffic Lights (SEMin)Alvarega/Camargo stretches. CTA 5

    Cet, DO, GSC 1997

    Sao Paulo, Brazil.

    SCOOT in Toronto Siemens Automotive USA 1995Traffic Technology International, Spring 1995.

    SCOOT in Santiago. Automatic Incident Detection andimproved traffic control in urban areas

    Coeymans-Avaria J E, Villaseca A, Zucker M, Jofre F 1995

    Seminar J, 22nd European Transport Forum, Warwick University,September 1994

    The Metropolitan SCOOT demonstration project Quan B Y, Greenough J C, Kelman W L 1993Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto.

    The application of SCOOT in developing countries Peck C, Gorton P T W, Liren D 1990Third International Conference on Road Traffic Control. IEE.London, UK.

    An evaluation of the effect of SCOOT on road safety Hunt J G, Griffiths J D, Moses T S 1990TRRL Contractors Report 236.

    SCOOT - model accuracy Carden P, Hounsell N B, Bretherton R D 1989TRRL Contractors Report 153.

    Bicycle SCOOT in Beijing, China Wood K, Bretherton R D, Liren D 198816th PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, Bath, UK, September 1988.

  • Urban traffic control system incorporating SCOOT : designand Implementation

    Selby D L, Powell R 1987

    Proceedings of the ICE, Part 1, October 1987.

    Ageing of fixed-time traffic signal plans Bell M C, Bretherton R D 1986Conference on road traffic control, London, April 1986.

    Evaluation of Urban Traffic Control in Worcester 1986One page summary available from TCC division D Tp, TollgateHouse, Bristol.

    Dept. of Transport, Hereford and Worcester C.C. andTransportation Planning Assoc.

    SCOOT from scratch - experience in Worcester Coyler J 1985PTRC Annual Summer Meeting July 1985.

    SCOOT in Southampton Powell R J 1985PTRC Annual Summer Meeting July 1985.

    Traffic control studies in London: SCOOT and bus detection Chandler M J H, Cook D J 1985PTRC Annual Summer Meeting July 1985.

    A method of estimating the benefits of co-ordinating signalsby TRANSYT and SCOOT

    Robertson D I, Hunt P B 1982

    Traffic Engineering and Control, November 1982.

    SCOOT - a traffic responsive method of co-ordinating signals Hunt P B, Robertson D I, Bretherton R D, Winton R I 1981TRRL Laboratory Report 1014.

  • Version Papers:SCOOT Managing Congestion, Communication and Control Bretherton R D, Bodger M, Cowling J 2005SMART Moving Conference, Birmingham, April 2005.

    Effective urban traffic management and control SCOOT V4.4 Bretherton D, Bowen G, Wood K 2002European Transport Conference, Cambridge, September 2002

    SCOOT Version 4 Bretherton R D, Bowen G T 1998IEE Conference on Road Transport Information and Control,London, 1998.

    Latest developments in SCOOT - Version 3.1 Bowen G T, Bretherton R D 1996Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control, IEE, April 1996.

    Current developments in SCOOT: Version 3 Bretherton R D 1996Transportation Research Record No. 1554, TransportationResearch Board, Washington D.C.

    Recent enhancements to SCOOT - SCOOT version 2.4 Bretherton R D, Bowen G T 1990Proceedings of the 3rd Internation Conference on Road TrafficControl, IEE, London. May 1990.

    Overview Papers:SCOOT the future Bretherton D. Bodger M, Baber N 2004Road Traffic Information and Control Conference 2004, IEE,London April 2004

    SCOOT Nottinghamshire County Council 1997http://utc.nottscc.gov.uk/ttisscoo.htm

  • Transport planning and traffic engineering 4th edition :Chapter 27: signal control in networks

    O'Flaherty C A, Bell M G H 1997

    Arnold, 338 Euston Road, London, NW1 3BH.

    The SCOOT Urban Traffic Control system Driver Information and Traffic Management division, DoT 1995Traffic Advisory Leaflet 4/95.

    SCOOT: The world's foremost adaptive traffic control system Bing B H, Carter A 1995Traffic Technology International 1995.

    Urban Traffic control systems review Wood K 1993TRL Project Report 41.

    Optimizing networks of traffic signals in real time - the SCOOTmethod

    Robertson D I, Bretherton R D 1991

    IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol 40 No. 1,February 1991.

    The SCOOT on-line traffic signal optimisation technique Hunt P B, Robertson D I, Bretherton R D, Royle M C 1982Traffic Engineering and Control, April 1982.

    SCOOT - a traffic responsive method of co-ordinating signals Hunt P B, Robertson D I, Bretherton R D, Winton R I 1981TRRL Laboratory Report 1014.

  • Other Papers:

    Bus Priority:

    Improved traffic management and bus priority with SCOOT Wood K, Bretherton D, Maxwell A, Smith K and Bowen G 20029th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Chicago,November 2002

    Bus priority in SCOOT Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions 2000Traffic Advisory Leaflet 8/00, DETR.

    Intelligent bus priority in London: towards large scaleimplementation

    Hounsell N B, Landles J, Bretherton R D, Gardner K 2000

    7th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November2000.

    Intelligent bus priority in London: evaluation and exploitationin INCOME

    Hounsell N B, Landles J, Bretherton R D, Gardner K 1999

    6th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, November1999.

    Enhanced bus priority using signals: the INCOME project Hounsell N B, Riley K, Alexander M 1998Proceedings of the AET Conference, Loughborough, September1998.

    Bus priority in SCOOT Bowen G T 1997TRL Report 255.

    Intelligent systems for priority at traffic signals in London: theINCOME project

    Hounsell N B, Landles J, Bretherton R D, Gardner K 1997

    4th World Congress on ITS, ICC Berlin, October 1997.

    Bus Priority Nottinghamshire County Council 1997http://utc.nottscc.gov.uk/ttisbusp.htm

  • Public transport priority in SCOOT Bretherton R D, Hounsell N B, Radia B 1996Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Intelligent TransportSystems, USA.

    PROMPT: Field trial and simulation results of bus priority inSCOOT

    Hounsell N B, McLeod F, Bretherton R D, Bowen G T 1996

    Proceedings of the 8th International conference on Road trafficmonitoring and control, IEE, April 1996.

    Bus priority in SCOOT: results of the PROMPT trial in London Hounsell N B, Landles J 1995Proceedings of the 23rd PTRC European Transport Forum,Warwick, September 1995.

    Public transport priority at traffic signals in London: Progress,performance and opportunities

    Hounsell N B, Landles J 1995

    Proceedings of the 2nd PTRC World Conference on IntelligentTransport systems, Japan, 1995.

    Integrated ATT strategies for urban arterials: DRIVE II projectPRIMAVERA. 2. Bus priority in SCOOT and SPOT using TIRIS

    Fox K, Montgomery F, Shepherd S, Smith C 1995

    Traffic Engineering and Control, June 1995.

    Public transport initiatives in Surrey Teer A, Cuthbertson T, Carson G 1994Traffic Engineering and Control, Vol 35, No. 2.

    Active bus priority in SCOOT Bowen G T, Bretherton R D 1994Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control, April 1994.

    Buses to get green light through city traffic Hamer M. 1994New Scientist, Vol 142, No 1924.

  • Signal priority for public transport vehicles using advancetraffic control systems: a comparative evaluation of ATSAC,SCATS and SCOOT

    Daniel J 1992

    Transportation engineering program, Texam A&M University USA.

    Remote Monitoring: SCOOT experience and bus priority inLondon

    Chandler M 1984

    IEE Meeting, May 1984.

    Emissions:

    SCOOT estimates of emissions from vehicles Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions 2000Traffic Advisory Leaflet 9/00, DETR

    Vehicle emissions management with urban trafficmanagement and control systems

    Wood K, Ash A, Smith K 2000

    IEE Conference on Road Transport Information and Control,London, 2000.

    Breathing space Wood K, Cloke J 2000Surveyor, August 2000.

    Quantifying changes in carbon monoxide levels following theinstallation of SCOOT

    Reynolds S, Bell M 1998

    Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on RoadTransport Information and Control, London, April 1998.

    Breathing spaces Crawford D 1997Surveyor, December 1997.

  • The production of emissions estimates using SCOOT Shearn S, Wood K 1997Proceedings of the 25th European Transport Forum, September1997.

    Integration of traffic and environmental monitoring andmanagement systems

    Bell M C, Reynolds S A, William W J, Berry R 1996

    Proceedings of the 8th International conference on road trafficmonitoring and control, London, April 1996.

    Roadside research Jabez A 1996Surveyor, January 1996.

    Urban congestion reduction for energy conservation: controlstrategies for urban street systems - a state of the art. Finalreport

    Hajjiri S A, Stephanedes Y J 1988

    Minnesota University, Minneapolis, department of civil and mineralengineering.

    Gating:

    SCOOT Gating Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions 2000Traffic Advisory Leaflet 7/00, DETR.

    Queue relocation and bus priority using SCOOT gating Oakes J A J, Kelly I T 1996Proceedings of the 24th European Transport Forum, BrunelUniversity, September 1996.

    Traffic restraint by SCOOT gating Wood K 1995in Sucharov, L.V. - Urban Transport and the Environment for the21st Century.

    Gating traffic into congested areas Wood K 1993IEE colloquium on Electronics in managing the demand for road

  • capacity, November 1993.

    Congestion management / incident detection:

    Congestion and incident management using the SCOOT UTCSystem

    Bretherton R D, Wood K, Baker K 2000

    IEE conference on Road Transport Information and Control,London, 2000.

    Congestion and incident management in signalised networkscontrolled by the SCOOT UTC system

    Bretherton R D, Wood K, Radia B 1999

    5th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Toronto,1999.

    COSMOS - congestion management strategies and methodsin urban sites

    Wood K, Bielfeldt C, Biora F, Kruse G 1998

    Proceedings of the AET European Transport Conference,September 1998.

    Congestion and incident management in SCOOT Bretherton R D, Wood K, Raha N 1997Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on ITS, Berlin, October1997.

    UTC strategies for congested networks Wood K, Palmer J P, Bretherton R D, Shearn S 1997TRL Report 240.

    TR 1015 - COSMOS (Project Summary) Telematics Application Programme 1997An applied research programme of the E.C. DGXII C/Ehttp://158.169.50.95:10080/telematics/transp/cosmos-txt.html

    Traffic congestion incident detection Bowers D J, Bretherton R D, Bowen G T, Wall G T 1996TRL Laboratory Report 217.

  • Automatic incident detection and improved traffic control inurban areas

    Bowers D J, Palmer J P, Wall G T 1995

    Proceedings of the 23rd PTRC European Transport Forum,Warwick, September, 1995.

    Congestion analysis and diagnosis in UTC networks Wood K, Palmer J, Bretherton R D 1994Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control, April 1994.

    Traffic monitoring and incident detection in urban areas Bretherton R D, Bowen G T, Bowers D J 1994IFAC Symposium on Transport Systems, China.

    Incident detection and traffic monitoring in urban areas Bretherton R D, Bowen G T 1991Proceedings of the DRIVE Conference - Advanced Telematics inRoad Transport, Brussels.

    The effect of an incident in a SCOOT system - in simulationand on-street

    Hunt P B, Holland T R 1985

    Traffic Engineering and Control, February, 1985.

    ASTRID:

    The ASTRID/INGRID incident detection system for urban areas Bowers D J, Bretherton R D 1995The Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems,Japan.

    ASTRID - Automatic SCOOT traffic database Hounsell N B, McLeod F 1990TRL Report CR 235.

  • Case Studies:

    Dalian wonder: solving China's traffic puzzle Shun J T, Hai Y D 2000Traffic Technology International, February/March 2000.

    Seamless in Southampton: integrated city-region control Crawford D 1999Traffic Engineering and Control, December 1999.

    Monitoring and evaluation of a public transport priorityscheme in Eastleigh

    TRL Ltd.TRG (Southampton University) and PortsmouthUniversity

    1999

    TRL Report 411, TRL, Crowthorne.

    Monitoring and evaluation of a public transport priorityscheme in Southampton

    TRL Ltd.TRG (Southampton University) and PortsmouthUniversity

    1999

    TRL Report 413, TRL, Crowthorne.

    AUSCI-SCOOT: A transatlantic partnership for SCOOT Ragsdale P 1998Traffic Technology International December 1997/January 1998.

    Desperately seeking solutions: Chile's traffic challenge Nuttall I 1997Traffic Technology International No. 9, April May 1997.

    Corridor traffic management for a parallel arterial andexpressway: An interface between the Metropolitan TorontoSCOOT Urban Traffic Control System and GARDINER - LakeShore Corridor Management System

    Bodger M, Allen R 1997

    4th World Congress on ITS, ICC Berlin, October 1997.

    Tayside's traffic technology Goddard L 1997Highways. Vol 65, No 3.

  • A comparison of SCOOT and MOVA on the A12 arterial road Kemp S, Silcock P, Robertson D 1997Traffic Engineering and Control, December 1997.

    Flowing to a samba beat Karlsson M 1996Traffic Technoolgy International, No6.

    An Introduction to the Instrumented City Facility Bell M, Evans R, Reynolds S, Boddy R, Hill I 1996Traffic Engineering and Control Vol 37. No. 12.

    M40 Longbridge Interchange junction improvements Knight P 1996Highways and Transportation, Vol 43, No 7/8.

    Keeping Leicestershire Moving Sherrington M 1996Surveyor. Issue 3, October 1996.

    The Durban SCOOT system The Durban Metropolitan Borough Council 1996http://www.durban.gov.za/central/trf_tran/trf_man/scoot.htm

    Vehicle detection in Norwich Cranshaw V, Shaw J M 1995Highways and Transportation Institution of Highways andTransportation.

    Integrated urban transport management in Southampton McDonald M, Richards A Shinakis E G 1995Proceedings on the second world congress on Intelligent TransportSystem, Japan, 1995.

    Birmingham's blueprint for city traffic Baker B 1995Surveyor, Vol 181, No 5275.

    SCOOT - the South East Asia experience Bing B H 1995Highways and Transportation, Hong Kong special issue, Vol 42,No 9.

  • ROMANSE (ROad MANagement System for Europe) Project Tarrant D 1994Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control. April 1994.

    The ROMANSE project for integrated urban transportmanagement

    McDonald M 1994

    Proceedings of the OECD seminar TT3 on advanced roadtransport technologies, Japan, June 1994.

    An integrated future for Birmingham's travellers Pearce R 1994Highways and Transportation, Vol 41, No.2.

    Analysis of the performance of a SCOOT UTC system Robertson D I, Jackson P C 199422nd PTRC European Transport Forum, Warwick, September1994.

    UTC/SCOOT traffic adaptive control system: a demonstrationproject in Metropolitan Toronto

    Floyd D P 1993

    Recommendation letter, the Municipality of Toronto.

    Traffic in Belfast: integrated network management. Maxwell R B 1992Permanent International Association of Road Congresses, No 277.

    Urban traffic control developments in Leicestershire Gillam W J, Withill R A 1990Highways and Transportation, Vol 37, No 10.

    SCOOT: the Red Deer experience Foster D I 1988in Ismart et al. Computers and Traffic: A winning combination. Acompendium of technical papers: ITE 58th annual meetingVancouver, September, 1988.

    Urban traffic control - SCOOT in Middlesbrough Cawthorne P 1987Municipal Engineer. 4, August.

  • Area traffic control systems and electronic road pricing inHong Kong

    Chang C C, Catling I 1986

    Proceedings of the 2nd International conference on road trafficcontrol, London, April 1986.

    Urban traffic control in Hong Kong with SCOOT Maynard N, Renaud D J 1986Sino-British Highways and Urban Conference, Beijing, November1986.

    Implementation of SCOOT in Beijing Liren D, Bell H 1986Sino-British Highways and Urban Conference, Beijing, November1986.

    London goes for a SCOOT in urban traffic control system Chandler M J H 1982Municipal Journal. May 1982.

    The development of Urban Traffic Control in London: fixed-time and SCOOT.

    Chandler M J H 1981

    Traffic Engineering and Control, October 1981.

  • Miscellaneous:

    The use of alternative methods of detection with SCOOTadaptive traffic control systems

    Glover P, Bodger M, Clarke R 2002

    9th World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, Chicago,October 2002

    Prediction of road traffic noise from the SCOOT demand-responsive traffic-control system

    Goodman P 1998

    Traffic Engineering and Control, June 1998.

    Improving pedestrian priority in UTC systems Austin K P, Martin B 1996Proceedings of the 24th European Transport Forum, BrunelUniversity, September 1996.

    The use of SCOOT type single loop detectors to measurespeed, journey time and queue status on non-scoot controlledlinks

    Cherrett T J, Bell H A, McDonald M 1996

    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control, April 1996.

    Real-time control of signalised networks - differentapproaches for different needs

    Dion F, Yagar S 1996

    Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control, April 1996.

    The identification of recurrent urban traffic congestion Evans R G, Bell M C 1996Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Road TrafficMonitoring and Control, April 1996.

    Urban Traffic management and control (UTMC) systems:strategies for the future

    Wood K 1996

    Proceedings of the 24th European Transport Forum, BrunelUniversity, September 1996.

  • ATMS projects in the UK Gillan W J 1993Proceedings of the Advance Traffic Management Conference,Florida, 1993.

    Motoring towards the Millenium Bond R 1997Surveyor, Vol. 184, No. 5419.

    Control Experiment Purdie H 1997Surveyor. Vol 184, No 5436.

    Traffic control systems handbookDepartment of Transportation, Federal Highway administration

    Siemens Traffic Controls Limited in the United Kingdom Siemens Traffic Controls Ltd. 1997http://www.siemens.co.uk/traffic/scoot.htm

    SCOOT over old technology City of San Diego 1997http://www.fta.dot.gov/library/technology/APTS/tws/scoot.htm

    Battling the elements for traffic control Curnow A 1997Traffic Technology International Feb/Mar 1997.

    Signs of the times Bywaters I, Maynard G 1996Highways and Transportation, Vol 43, No 7/8.

    Signals 2000: New themes in design, materials and operation Dempsey P 1996Traffic Technology International, No 5.

    Enviro-city goes higher-tech Curnow A 1996Traffic Technology International, No. 6.

  • Integrated ATT strategies for urban arterials: DRIVE II projectPRIMAVERA. 1. Overview

    Fox K, Montgomery F, May T 1995

    Traffic Engineering and Control, May 1995.

    Integrated ATT strategies for urban arterials: DRIVE II projectPRIMAVERA. 2. Bus priority in SCOOT and SPOT using TIRIS

    Fox K, Montgomery F, Shepherd S, Smith C 1995

    Traffic Engineering and Control, June 1995.

    Integrated ATT strategies for urban arterials: DRIVE II projectPRIMAVERA. 3. The Dewsbury Road experiment

    Fox K, Balmforth P, Franklin P, Montgomery F 1995

    Traffic Engineering and Control, July/August 1995.

    SCOOT: Current developments Bretherton R D 1995Traffex 1995 Conference.

    Tuning the traffic model Carden P, Glover P 1995Highways, Vol 13, No 7.

    Coming of age Pattinson J W 1995Highways, Vol 63, No 7.

    SCOOT - an update Martin P T, Hockaday S L M 1995ITE journal, Vol 65, No 1.

    Transport telematics implementation issues Gillan W 1994Proceedings of OECD seminar TT3 on Advanced Road TransportTechnologies. Japan, June 1994.

    Urban traffic control (UTC) in SCOPE cities McDonald M, Phillips P 1994Proceedings of the first World Congress on applications oftransport telematics and intelligent vehicle-highway systems,November 1994.

  • Integrating traffic control systems - helping people do theirjobs

    Kelman L 1994

    Urban Transport Telematics Forum technical papers, Strathclyde,October 1994.

    SCOOT in the USA Genovese J A 1994Institute of Transportation Engineers: Compendium of technicalpapers, 64th ITE Annual meeting, Texas.

    The role of technology in maximising the use of urban roadspace

    Wootton J, Shearn S 1993

    TRL paper to the Freight Transport Association NationalConference, September 1993.

    Using SCOOT weightings to benefit strategic routes Wood K, Baker R T 1992Traffic Engineering and Control. Vol 33, No 4.

    Traffic signal control (1990-1992) TRL Library Services 1992Library Services, TRL, Crowthorne.

    Road traffic research in the United Kingdom: leading the world McDonald M 1992Permanent International Association of Road Congresses, No 277.

    Signalling roundabouts. 2:Controlling the revolution Jones S E 1992Traffic Engineering and Control Vol 33, No 11.

    The impact of UTC on road safety, with particular reference topedestrians

    Hunt O 1992

    VTI Rapport 380a PT 3.

    No jams tomorrow Goodwin W 1991Engineer, Vol 273, No 7069.

  • Basic concepts and results using the SCOOT system Bretherton R D 1990Seminar on mobility and quality of life in cities, 1990.

    The effects of traffic management and control on vehiclecapacity in London

    Belcher P 1990

    Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Road TrafficControl, IEE, London, May 1990.

    Pedestrian delay at Pelican crossing in areas operating underSCOOT

    Hunt J G, Griffiths J D, Hughes K M 1990

    TRRL contractor report 249.

    Urban Traffic Control Peck C, Gorton P T W, Maynard G H 1990Developing World Transport.

    Control room with a view 1989Surveyor, 25th May 1989.

    Dynamic traffic control system SCOOT - further developments Bretherton R D 1989Engineering Foundation Conference on Traffic Control Methods,California, February 1989.

    SCOOT urban traffic control system - philosophy andevaluation

    Bretherton R D 1989

    CCCT '89 Conference, Paris, September 1989.

    SCOOT data and route guidance Hounsell N B, McDonald M 1989Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Road TrafficMontoring, IEE, London, 1989.

    The use of traffic management procedures in SCOOT Burton P, Gorton P 1987PTRC Meeting, 1987.

  • The use of SCOOT for traffic management Bretherton R D, Bowen G T, Burton P G, Wood K 1986IEE Second International Conference on Road Traffic Control,London, April 1986.

    The application of SCOOT control to an isolated intersection Carden P, McDonald M 1985Traffic Engineering and Control, June 1985.

    Street-wise SCOOT moves traffic that other systems can'treach

    Bowen G T, Vincent R A 1985

    Surveyor, December 1985.

    SCOOT traffic control Bourner M S 1984Seminar on microelectronics for road and traffic management,Tokyo, October 1984.

    Estimating the benefits of signal co-ordination usingTRANSYT or SCOOT optimisation

    Robertson D I, Hunt P B 1983

    53rd ITE conference, London, August 1983.

    Real-time area wide traffic control - the user's viewpoint Clowes D J 1982Traffic Engineering and Control, April 1982.

    On-line optimisation of signal co-ordination - the SCOOTmethod

    Robertson D I, Hunt P B, Bretherton R D, Bowen G T 1982

    Annual transport convention of NITRR, Pretoria, August 1982.The use of SCOOT in low flow conditions Bretherton R D, Rai G I 1982Traffic Engineering and Control, December 1982.