Science vs Luck
-
Upload
jim-wallman -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
0
Transcript of Science vs Luck
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
1/25
SCIENCEVERSUS
LUCKA game of war, doctrine and matchsticks
Devised and written by Jim Wallman
Jim Wallman 1990 1
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
2/25
SCIENCE VERSUS LUCKA game of war, doctrine and matchsticks
Devised and written by Jim Wallman
Setting Up The Game
The game is designed for a group of players ideally as a fun club project. It has scopefor role playing, planning and playing with matchstick cannons and toy soldiers.
To work best it needs around 8-10 people ideally in a club setting (ie. A hall and severaltables), though it will work with less, down to two players and one table (if you just playthe battle game part).
The players are divided into teams of 2. There are enough briefings for six teams, thoughit is easy to ad teams. Ideally you need an even number of teams, but that isnt essential.
The Game Structure
The game is played in three distinct phases:
1. The Arms Exhibition buying the weapons for the next war
2. Evaluation and Doctrine - testing the new weapons and deciding how they will beused
3. Battle the acid test of both equipment and doctrine.
Each of these phases is distinctive.
1. The Arms Exhibition.The players start off representing senior military figures from a fictitious 19 th centurypowers which are visiting the Grand Geneva Arms Exhibition of 1859. They are giventheir briefing to purchase the best weaponry they can for their armed forces. Of coursethe definition of best will depend on their briefing.
The actual matchstick cannon models you haveare laid out as if on display at an arms fair, withcard labels and they can be inspected. We havefound it helps to have lots of different models.But they must all work.
Unfortunately the players may not touch them,or test them out they are relying on themanufacturers description and the look of thething to decide which cannon to buy for theirarmed forces. Actually testing them represents
the cannons performance in battle, so they wont get a chance until later.
Jim Wallman 1990 2
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
3/25
The guns models available are then bought at auction teams can bid for the one theywant. If you have enough models then a team can buy more than one cannon.This represents the procurement decisions taken by the ministry of war.
2. Evaluation and Doctrine
The players now drop a level in seniority and become the planning staff in entirelydifferent countries (swapping with a country played in the first phase). They are giventheir Doctrine briefing. One player has to devise the infantry doctrine, one has to devisethe artillery doctrine.They have to write this doctrine down.At this point they can test the gun/s and line up the toy soldiers to try out doctrine, but noton the battle terrain (we use the floor or a spare table for this). The players may notevaluate the cannon using the lives of their toy soldiers. However, they can create papertargets etc to test accuracy.
Once the doctrine has been written down by all teams, we can move on to the war fighting
phase.
3. Battle.A war has broken out between various of the powers represented. This is theiropportunity to see how their procurement, doctrine and planning will pan out.As it happens, the frontiers of these countries include a number of key passes, which arerepresented by the tables with terrain on.
Setting Up the BattleFor each battle you will need a table per team and enough cloths, trees, buildings etc toset up a simple and fairly open terrain on each one. To ensure the entire game isplayable in a reasonable time, it is best to have multiple tables though it could be playedout several times on the same table.
The terrain should not be elaborate andcover should be fairly sparse, like this:
Before the battle the players getdemoted again and re-arranged oncemore. The player writing the infantry doctrine becomes a junior front line artillerycommander, and the player writing the artillery doctrine becomes a junior front lineinfantry commander. If you want to create a further challenge you can get them to swapnationality once again too.
The player then have to read their written doctrine (which they didnt write) and must fightthe battle accordingly.
The battlefield is set out something like this.
Jim Wallman 1990 3
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
4/25
The Battle Rules explain how the war is fought.
Game OverAt the end of the game, there are no winners as such, but there should be a livelydiscussion about which doctrine was superior. With any luck they will also moan
continually about the poor purchasing decisions and the daft doctrine handed down bytheir superiors.
Summary of Briefings:There is one document, called Arms Bazaar which has briefings for each country forphase 1 of the game. There is also the document Weapons which is a guide to how youmight describe your model guns though you may have to produce your own version.
There are separate documents for each country, each one consists of the briefings for theInfantry and Artillery evaluation teams in Phase 2. Namely, Albionia, Bosrovia,Freedonia, Ruritania and Sylvania.
Jim Wallman 1990 4
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
5/25
SCIENCE Vs LUCK
THE BATTLE RULES
EQUIPMENTAt least one working matchstick firing cannon model.A collection of 50 or so plastic 20mm or 25mm figures (Airfix will do fine but they needto be able to stand up unaided, so you might have to make small card bases for some ofthem).Tape measure or rulerDice10 Matches or cocktail sticks per cannon.Model terrain such as trees/lichen etc and a cloth.
LAYOUTA wargame terrain is laid out, featuring undulations in the ground, trees, lichen etc. Avoiddense terrain and hedgerows, as this will skew the game.
The cannon is placed at one end of the table and is controlled by one player, the figuresplaced at the other end and controlled by the other player.
SEQUENCE OF THE TURNEach turn has two phases:
1. The Attacking Player's PhaseIn this the attacking player (in command of the figures) moves all his figures in
accordance with the rules below. He has a time limit of 2 minutes (or less as directed bythe umpire).
2. The Defending Player's Phase.In this the defending player (in command of the gun) fires as many matchsticks of
his allocation for that turn as he can in one minute.
MOVEMENTFigures may move 6" (15cm) at the walk or 9" (22 cm) at the run.Figures may not move and fire.Movement speed and policy about taking cover must be according to doctrine as laiddown in the appropriate latest version of the attacking forces Infantry Manual. So, forexample, running will not be permitted unless it says so in the Manual.
Guns may move 6" (15 cm) during their phase - and lose 2 shots penalty for the timetaken.
Jim Wallman 1990 5
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
6/25
FIRING
If infantry get within 12" (30cm) of the gun they can (if doctrine permits) open fire on the'crew'. Roll 1d6 & score 6 to hit.If they start firing within 6" (15cm), roll 5 or 6 to hit.
Each 'hit' takes one shot from the guns allocation on the subsequent phase.
Cannon fire is simple. Fire a matchstick and if a figure is knocked over it is a casualty.Casualties are NOT REMOVED from the playing area.
If due to mishandling the matchstick does not properly leave the barrel of the gun whenfired (=misfire) then that shot is lost for that phase.
MORALEThe gun will continue firing until overrun or all its shots are destroyed by infantry fire.
The infantry take a morale test on very simple lines:
Every time 10% of the total start strength are hit in a single turn, roll 1d6:
Score Result5-6 Continue unaffected3-4 Pause - no forward movement next phase (may fire if in range)1-2 Recoil - must move away on subsequent turns (either behind hard cover orincrease the range). Must take successful morale roll to stop recoiling.
FACTORS: Company Commander Obviously Leading +1Bugler Still Playing (if doctrine requires it) +1Still Adhering to doctrine in manual +1
Below 50% strength -1Out of sight of cannon -1
Note: The Company Commander can be regarded as the player - and as such need notbe affected by morale results if he wishes.
MELEEIf any attacking infantry reach the gun, it automatically loses one matchstick per figurethat reaches it.
WINNING AND LOSINGThe gun wins if it beats off the infantry.The infantry win if the gun loses all its matchsticks; ie. it is destroyed.
Jim Wallman 1990 6
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
7/25
ANNEXES : THE TEAM BRIEFINGS
Print out the following pages separately, one for each team there are enough for sixteams, though they all follow a pattern so you can easily create your own additionalfictional countries.
There is a list of made-up guns that you can use to describe your toy matchstick cannons or you can use your own descriptions.
The first batch of player briefings are the national briefings for the 1859 Arms Show inGeneva.
The second batch are the letters requesting development of new artillery and infantrydoctrines, again, specific to each fictional country.
The final page is the Extract from the old infantry training manual that the infantry doctrine
player is supposed to update. The is is the same for everyone and each infantry doctrinedevelopment player gets a copy of this.
It is most important that the players do not see any of the game structure, or the gamerules above prior to the game because, as in real life, they cannot know what battlefieldconditions are really like until the war starts.
Jim Wallman 1990 7
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
8/25
** G E N E V A 1 8 5 9 **
THE INTERNATIONAL EQUIPMENT
EXHIBITION
Field Artillery Weapons Exhibit
Manufacturer Description
KRUPP Lichte Feld Kanone 'K'. 8.5cm.
ARMSTRONG 'Acme' Mk2 12pdr Horse Gun.
WHITWORTH Type D Field Gun (18pdr).
VICKERS 4.7" Heavy Howitzer.
FN Belgium QF 75mm Field Gun.
BOFORS The 'S' Gun. 105mm.
CREUSOT 60mm Canone de L'Infantrie
RHEINMETALL 7.6 cm Feldkanone.
OERLIKON Light Field Gun Mk IX. 80mm.
ROYAL ORDNANCE FACTORIES 25pdr Gun/Howitzer.
Advertisment:While you are visiting the show, why not visit 'La Cantiniere'restaurant andsample the delights of Modern French Military Cuisine?
Jim Wallman 1990 8
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
9/25
INTERNATIONAL ARMS BAZAAR
GENEVA 1859
You are representatives of the Silvanian
Government.
Your mission is to select two new artillery
pieces for your military. Your primary
objective is to achieve best value for money and
at the same time purchase the most impressive-looking
equipment to maintain your standing among other arms
purchasing nations.
The military worth of your purchases is, obviously,
important so you need to decide whether the equipment
looks effective too.
The precise military value of the hardware you buy will
be assessed by others.
In this exercise, you are to procure for the governmentat least one, and preferably two prototypes of new field
artillery pieces.
You should spend as little of your budget as possible.
Where there is competition between buyers from other
nations, the time-honoured method of competitive bidding
will be used. You will be issued with which to do this.
You can also indulge in side deals if this seems
worthwhile.
Good luck, and good hunting!
Jim Wallman 1990 9
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
10/25
INTERNATIONAL ARMS BAZAAR
GENEVA 1859
You are representatives of the Bosrovian
Government.
Your mission is to select two new artillery
pieces for your military. Your primary objective is to
achieve best value for money and at the same time
purchase the most impressive-looking equipment to
maintain your standing among other arms purchasing
nations.
The military worth of your purchases is, obviously,
important so you need to decide whether the equipment
looks effective too.
The precise military value of the hardware you buy will
be assessed by others.
In this exercise, you are to procure for the governmentat least one, and preferably two prototypes of new field
artillery pieces.
You should spend as little of your budget as possible.
Where there is competition between buyers from other
nations, the time-honoured method of competitive bidding
will be used. You will be issued with which to do this.
You can also indulge in side deals if this seems
worthwhile.
Good luck, and good hunting!
Jim Wallman 1990 10
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
11/25
INTERNATIONAL ARMS BAZAAR
GENEVA 1859
You are representatives of the
Ruritanian Government.
Your mission is to select two new
artillery pieces for your military.
Your primary objective is to achieve best value for
money and at the same time purchase the most impressive-
looking equipment to maintain your standing among other
arms purchasing nations.
The military worth of your purchases is, obviously,
important so you need to decide whether the equipment
looks effective too.
The precise military value of the hardware you buy will
be assessed by others.
In this exercise, you are to procure for the governmentat least one, and preferably two prototypes of new field
artillery pieces.
You should spend as little of your budget as possible.
Where there is competition between buyers from other
nations, the time-honoured method of competitive bidding
will be used. You will be issued with which to do this.
You can also indulge in side deals if this seems
worthwhile.
Good luck, and good hunting!
Jim Wallman 1990 11
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
12/25
INTERNATIONAL ARMS BAZAAR
GENEVA 1859
You are representatives of the Freedonian
Government.
Your mission is to select two new artillery
pieces for your military. Your primary
objective is to achieve best value for
money and at the same time purchase the
most impressive-looking equipment to
maintain your standing among other armspurchasing nations.
The military worth of your purchases is,
obviously, important so you need to decide
whether the equipment looks effective too.
The precise military value of the hardware you buy will
be assessed by others.
In this exercise, you are to procure for the government
at least one, and preferably two prototypes of new field
artillery pieces.
You should spend as little of your budget as possible.
Where there is competition between buyers from other
nations, the time-honoured method of competitive bidding
will be used. You will be issued with which to do this.
You can also indulge in side deals if this seemsworthwhile.
Good luck, and good hunting!
Jim Wallman 1990 12
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
13/25
INTERNATIONAL ARMS BAZAAR
GENEVA 1859
You are representatives of the Albionian
Government.
Your mission is to select two new
artillery pieces for your military. Your
primary objective is to achieve best value for money and
at the same time purchase the most impressive-looking
equipment to maintain your standing among other arms
purchasing nations.
The military worth of your purchases is, obviously,
important so you need to decide whether the equipment
looks effective too.
The precise military value of the hardware you buy will
be assessed by others.
In this exercise, you are to procure for the governmentat least one, and preferably two prototypes of new field
artillery pieces.
You should spend as little of your budget as possible.
Where there is competition between buyers from other
nations, the time-honoured method of competitive bidding
will be used. You will be issued with which to do this.
You can also indulge in side deals if this seems
worthwhile.
Good luck, and good hunting!
Jim Wallman 1990 13
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
14/25
INTERNATIONAL ARMS BAZAAR
GENEVA 1859
You are representatives of the
Latverian Government.
Your mission is to select two new
artillery pieces for your military.
Your primary objective is to
achieve best value for money and at
the same time purchase the most
impressive-looking equipment to maintain your standingamong other arms purchasing nations.
The military worth of your purchases is, obviously,
important so you need to decide whether the equipment
looks effective too.
The precise military value of the hardware you buy will
be assessed by others.
In this exercise, you are to procure for the government
at least one, and preferably two prototypes of new field
artillery pieces.
You should spend as little of your budget as possible.
Where there is competition between buyers from other
nations, the time-honoured method of competitive bidding
will be used. You will be issued with which to do this.
You can also indulge in side deals if this seemsworthwhile.
Good luck, and good hunting!
Jim Wallman 1990 14
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
15/25
MINSTRY OF SUPPLY
Government Buildings
20-28 Central Avenue
Hedar 3410
The Director Our Ref: S/Sup1/38/21
SCHOOL OF ARTILLERY
Hawkhill Range Your Ref: -
Eldershot 1120
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
WEAPONS EVALUATION TRIALS
As the process to modernise our armed forces continues, a number of Arms
manufacturers have made it known that they have some new and highly destructive
artillery weapons available for purchase.
We have examined the technical specifications of all those on the market, and
two prototypes in particular have been selected for more detailed evaluation.
These weapons will be delivered to the School in the next few days for you to
evaluate them.
You are to conduct trials and write a short report on which of the two shall
become our main artillery weapon into the 1860's and beyond.
You are to consider the following factors:
a. Ease of reloading and relaying.
b. Rate of fire.c. Smart appearance for ceremonial and public display.
d. Weight of shell.
e. Range.
f. Manoeuvrability
g. Sustainability under field conditions.
h. Accuracy.
Having made recommendations as to the best weapon, and subject to Ministerial
approval to the purchase, you are to revise the Manual of Artillery Tactics for
the employment of the new weapon - in particular in the anti-infantry role.
Features to consider are:
a. Range at which effective fire should be opened.b. Recommended rates of fire.
c. Preferred method of fire (ie. low or high trajectory etc).
d. Conditions under which the employment of the gun is most and
least effective.
e. Hints on the operation of the weapon itself.
These revisions will be in the form of short notes which will form the basis of
future training courses for the whole army.
I look forward to receiving your initial reports with all dispatch.
Matthew PanasonicMINISTER OF SUPPLY
Jim Wallman 1990 15
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
16/25
MINSTRY OF WAR,
DIRECTORATE OF ARMY TRAINING
Government Buildings
14-18 Central Avenue
Hedar 3410
The Director Our Ref: D/Inf/38/21
SCHOOL OF MUSKETRY
Bayonet House Your Ref: -
Eldershot 1120
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
REVISION 23 : INFANTRY TACTICS MANUAL 1860
1. You will be aware that all our neighbouring nations are busy
re-equipping their armies with new and more powerful artillery
weapons. This, in the view of the Chiefs of Staff, necessitates a
revision to the new Infantry Training Manual 1860 now in the
process of production.
2. I would therefore be grateful if you would provide me with an
outline draft chapter for the manual on Tactics On Assaulting GunPositions. I attach a relevant extract from the 1855 Manual for
ease of reference.
3. This draft, if accepted by the Chiefs of Staff, will form the
basis for all Army training on the subject over the next 10 years
at least.
4. Giving the printing and distribution time lag, I look forward
to your earliest response.
Major Gen. Arthur Dedshott
Director Army Training
Jim Wallman 1990 16
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
17/25
MINSTRY OF SUPPLY
Government Buildings
20-28 Central Avenue
Zephyr 1101
The Director Our Ref:S/Sup1/38/21
SCHOOL OF ARTILLERY
Sparrowhill Range Your Ref: -
Central Barracks
Willowshot 2430 Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
WEAPONS EVALUATION TRIALS
As the process to modernise our armed forces continues, a number of Arms manufacturers have
made it known that they have some new and highly destructive artillery weapons available for
purchase.
We have examined the technical specifications of all those on the market, and two in particular
have been selected for more detailed evaluation. These weapons will be delivered to the School in
the next few days for you to evaluate them.
You are to conduct trials and write a short report on which of the two shall be our main artillery
weapon into the 1860's and beyond.
You are to consider the following factors:
a. Ease of reloading and relaying.
b. Rate of fire.
c. Smart appearance for ceremonial and public display.
d. Weight of shell.
e. Range.
f. Manoeuvrability
g. Sustainability under field conditions.
h. Accuracy.
Having made recommendations as to the best weapon, and subject to Ministerial approval to the
purchase, you are to revise the Manual of Artillery Tactics for the employment of the new weapon
- in particular in the anti-infantry role. Features to consider are:a. Range at which effective fire should be opened.
b. Recommended rates of fire.
c. Preferred method of fire (ie. low or high trajectory etc).
d. Conditions under which the employment of the gun is most and least effective.
e. Hints on the operation of the weapon itself.
These revisions will be in the form of short notes which will form the basis of future training
courses for the whole army.
I look forward to receiving your initial reports with all dispatch.
Dr V. VayneMINISTER OF SUPPLY
Jim Wallman 1990 17
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
18/25
MINSTRY OF WAR,
DIRECTORATE OF ARMY TRAINING
Government Buildings
14-18 Central Avenue
Zephur 1101
The Director Our Ref: D/Inf/38/21
SCHOOL OF MUSKETRY
Matchlock House Your Ref: -
Willowshot 2430
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
REVISION 23 : INFANTRY TACTICS MANUAL 1860
1. You will be aware that all our neighbouring nations are busy re-equipping their armies with
new and more powerful artillery weapons. This, in the view of the Chiefs of Staff, necessitates a
revision to the new Infantry Training Manual 1860 now in the process of production.
2. I would therefore be grateful if you would provide me with an outline draft chapter for the
manual on Tactics On Assaulting Gun Positions. I attach a relevant extract from the 1855 Manualfor ease of reference.
3. This draft, if accepted by the Chiefs of Staff, will form the basis for all Army training on the
subject over the next 10 years at least.
4. Giving the printing and distribution time lag, I look forward to your earliest response.
Major Gen. Hiram J Thunderdog
Director Army Training
Jim Wallman 1990 18
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
19/25
MINSTRY OF SUPPLYGovernment Buildings20-28 Central AvenueASHUR 3410The Director Our Ref: S/Sup1/38/21
SCHOOL OF ARTILLERY
Whizbhan Range Your Ref: -
Central Barracks
Pharoot 2430 Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
WEAPONS EVALUATION TRIALS
As the process to modernise our armed forces continues, a number of Arms manufacturers have
made it known that they have some new and highly destructive artillery weapons available for
purchase.
We have examined the technical specifications of all those on the market, and two in particular
have been selected for more detailed evaluation. These weapons will be delivered to the School in
the next few days for you to evaluate them.
You are to conduct trials and write a short report on which of the two shall be our main artillery
weapon into the 1860's and beyond.
You are to consider the following factors:
a. Ease of reloading and relaying.
b. Rate of fire.c. Smart appearance for ceremonial and public display.
d. Weight of shell.
e. Range.
f. Manoeuvrability
g. Sustainability under field conditions.
h. Accuracy.
Having made recommendations as to the best weapon, and subject to Ministerial approval to the
purchase, you are to revise the Manual of Artillery Tactics for the employment of the new weapon
- in particular in the anti-infantry role. Features to consider are:
a. Range at which effective fire should be opened.b. Recommended rates of fire.
c. Preferred method of fire (ie. low or high trajectory etc).
d. Conditions under which the employment of the gun is most and least effective.
e. Hints on the operation of the weapon itself.
These revisions will be in the form of short notes which will form the basis of future training
courses for the whole army.
I look forward to receiving your initial reports with all dispatch.
Prof Hiram Z. Hackenbush
MINISTER OF SUPPLY
Jim Wallman 1990 19
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
20/25
MINSTRY OF WAR,DIRECTORATE OF ARMY TRAININGGovernment Buildings14-18 Central AvenueASHUR 3410
The Director Our Ref: D/Inf/38/21
SCHOOL OF MUSKETRY
Shako House Your Ref: -
Central Barracks
Pharoot 2430 Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
REVISION 23 : INFANTRY TACTICS MANUAL 1860
1. You will be aware that all our neighbouring nations are busy re-equipping their armies with
new and more powerful artillery weapons. This, in the view of the Chiefs of Staff, necessitates a
revision to the new Infantry Training Manual 1860 now in the process of production.
2. I would therefore be grateful if you would provide me with an outline draft chapter for the
manual on Tactics On Assaulting Gun Positions. I attach a relevant extract from the 1855 Manual
for ease of reference.
3. This draft, if accepted by the Chiefs of Staff, will form the basis for all Army training on the
subject over the next 10 years at least.
4. Giving the printing and distribution time lag, I look forward to your earliest response.
Major Gen. Horace Smyth
Director Army Training
Jim Wallman 1990 20
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
21/25
MINSTRY OF SUPPLY
Government Buildings
20-28 Central Avenue
Zweisetig 3410
The Director Our Ref: S/Sup1/38/21SCHOOL OF ARTILLERY
Finchhill Range Your Ref: -
Beechot 1120
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
WEAPONS EVALUATION TRIALS
As the process to modernise our armed forces continues, a number of Arms manufacturers have
made it known that they have some new and highly destructive artillery weapons available for
purchase.We have examined the technical specifications of all those on the market, and two in particular
have been selected for more detailed evaluation. These weapons will be delivered to the School in
the next few days for you to evaluate them.
You are to conduct trials and write a short report on which of the two shall be our main artillery
weapon into the 1860's and beyond.
You are to consider the following factors:
a. Ease of reloading and relaying.
b. Rate of fire.
c. Smart appearance for ceremonial and public display.
d. Weight of shell.
e. Range.
f. Manoeuvrability
g. Sustainability under field conditions.
h. Accuracy.
Having made recommendations as to the best weapon, and subject to Ministerial approval to the
purchase, you are to revise the Manual of Artillery Tactics for the employment of the new weapon
- in particular in the anti-infantry role. Features to consider are:
a. Range at which effective fire should be opened.
b. Recommended rates of fire.
c. Preferred method of fire (ie. low or high trajectory etc).d. Conditions under which the employment of the gun is most and least effective.
e. Hints on the operation of the weapon itself.
These revisions will be in the form of short notes which will form the basis of future training
courses for the whole army.
I look forward to receiving your initial reports with all dispatch.
Sir Peckham Rye
MINISTER OF SUPPLY
Jim Wallman 1990 21
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
22/25
MINISTRY OF WAR,
DIRECTORATE OF ARMY TRAINING
Government Buildings
14-18 Central Avenue
Zweisetig 3410
The Director Our Ref: D/Inf/38/21
SCHOOL OF MUSKETRY
Shako House Your Ref: -
Beechot 1120
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
REVISION 23 : INFANTRY TACTICS MANUAL 1860
1. You will be aware that all our neighbouring nations are busy re-equipping their armies with
new and more powerful artillery weapons. This, in the view of the Chiefs of Staff, necessitates a
revision to the new Infantry Training Manual 1860 now in the process of production.
2. I would therefore be grateful if you would provide me with an outline draft chapter for the
manual on Tactics On Assaulting Gun Positions. I attach a relevant extract from the 1855 Manual
for ease of reference.
3. This draft, if accepted by the Chiefs of Staff, will form the basis for all Army training on the
subject over the next 10 years at least.
4. Giving the printing and distribution time lag, I look forward to your earliest response.
Major Gen. Hyde Parke
Director Army Training
Jim Wallman 1990 22
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
23/25
MINSTRY OF SUPPLY
Government Buildings
20-28 Central Avenue
Footar 3410
The Director Our Ref: S/Sup1/38/21
SCHOOL OF ARTILLERY
Tithill Range Your Ref: -
Willowshot 1120
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
WEAPONS EVALUATION TRIALS
As the process to modernise our armed forces continues, a number of Arms manufacturers have
made it known that they have some new and highly destructive artillery weapons available forpurchase.
We have examined the technical specifications of all those on the market, and two in particular
have been selected for more detailed evaluation. These weapons will be delivered to the School in
the next few days for you to evaluate them more fully.
You are to conduct trials and write a short report on which of the two prototypes shall become our
main artillery weapon into the 1860's and beyond.
You are to consider the following factors:
a. Ease of reloading and relaying.
b. Rate of fire.
c. Smart appearance for ceremonial and public display.
d. Weight of shell.
e. Range.
f. Manoeuvrability
g. Sustainability under field conditions.
h. Accuracy.
Having made recommendations as to the best weapon, and subject to Ministerial approval to the
purchase, you are to revise the Manual of Artillery Tactics for the employment of the
recommended new weapon - in particular in the anti-infantry role. Features to consider are:
a. Range at which effective fire should be opened.b. Recommended rates of fire.
c. Preferred method of fire (ie. low or high trajectory etc).
d. Conditions under which the employment of the gun is most and least effective.
e. Hints on the operation of the weapon itself.
These revisions will be in the form of short notes which will form the basis of future training
courses for the whole army.
I look forward to receiving your initial reports with all dispatch.
Prof Q. Quentin Quail
MINISTER OF SUPPLY
Jim Wallman 1990 23
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
24/25
MINSTRY OF WAR,
DIRECTORATE OF ARMY TRAINING
Government Buildings14-18 Central Avenue
Footar 3410
The Director Our Ref: D/Inf/38/21
SCHOOL OF MUSKETRY
Backback House Your Ref: -
Willowshot 1120
Date: 7 July 1860
Dear Director
REVISION 23 : INFANTRY TACTICS MANUAL 1860
1. You will be aware that all our neighbouring nations are busy re-equipping their armies with
new and more powerful artillery weapons. This, in the view of the Chiefs of Staff, necessitates a
revision to the new Infantry Training Manual 1860 now in the process of production.
2. I would therefore be grateful if you would provide me with an outline draft chapter for themanual on Tactics On Assaulting Gun Positions. I attach a relevant extract from the 1855 Manual
for ease of reference.
3. This draft, if accepted by the Chiefs of Staff, will form the basis for all Army training on the
subject over the next 20 years at least.
4. Giving the printing and distribution time lag, I look forward to your earliest response.
Major Gen. Hewlett Packhard
Director Army Training
Jim Wallman 1990 24
-
8/6/2019 Science vs Luck
25/25
EXTRACT FROM THE INFANTRY TACTICS MANUAL 1855.
C H A P T E R 17
TACTICS ON ASSAULTING GUN POSITIONS
231. The tactical employment of the standard 50-man infantry
company requires that all infantry action is offensive in nature,
and this is especially so in the attack on Artillery positions.
Speed and Aggression are the watchwords in this sort of operation.
232. The Company Commander should, wherever possible, ensure that
the route to the guns are clear of significant obstacles, and if
this is not the case, to ensure that his men have the means tocross said obstacles.
233. The Company should form up out of sight of the guns, in the
standard 2-deep line open order formation (ie. with one man's
space between each man).
234. On the given Order from the Company Commander, The Company
shall fix bayonets.
235. On the given order the Company shall advance at a steady and
determined pace towards the guns. Steadiness is regarded asparamount for ensuring that the enemy are intimidated to the
greatest extent.
236. Once within 50 yards of the objective the company bugler
shall sound "The Charge" and The Company shall overrun the gun
positions.
237. Casualties are not to be assisted until after the assault is
complete.
238. Engaging in musketry against gun crew is not regarded aseffective, the bayonet being the primary and decisive arm on the
battlefield.