Science 2.0

23
Science 2.0 The power and poten3al of e‐communica3on Marc W Cado<e University of Toronto

description

 

Transcript of Science 2.0

Page 1: Science 2.0

Science2.0Thepowerandpoten3alofe‐communica3on

MarcWCado<eUniversityofToronto

Page 2: Science 2.0
Page 3: Science 2.0
Page 4: Science 2.0
Page 5: Science 2.0
Page 6: Science 2.0
Page 7: Science 2.0

Whatusedtohappen…

Page 8: Science 2.0

Feb.2009

Page 9: Science 2.0
Page 10: Science 2.0

Oct.2009

Page 11: Science 2.0
Page 12: Science 2.0
Page 13: Science 2.0
Page 14: Science 2.0
Page 15: Science 2.0
Page 16: Science 2.0
Page 17: Science 2.0

Thegood…

•  Discussionisfast•  Manypar3cipants

•  Inclusive•  Rigourinnumbers

Page 18: Science 2.0

Rigourinnumbers

Viegasetal.2004

Page 19: Science 2.0

Viegasetal.2004

Page 20: Science 2.0

Viegasetal.2004Halffixedinlessthan3minutes

Page 21: Science 2.0

Thebad(orperhaps‘theunfulfilled’)

•  Rela3velyfewvoices

Page 22: Science 2.0

Thebad(orperhaps‘theunfulfilled’)

•  Rela3velyfewvoices•  limiteddiscourse

•  disconnectedfromjournalsandtheirreaders

•  blurringofscien3ficdiscoursefrompersonalnarra3ves/opinions

Page 23: Science 2.0

Thefuture

•  bloggingneedstogrow(andspecialize?)•  integra3oniskey

•  JournalRSSfeeds•  ‘likes’andra3ngs•  linkedcommentaries/blogposts(DOItags)•  recommenda3onsbasedonsimilar‘likes’