Sci-Fi Tracker Performance
description
Transcript of Sci-Fi Tracker Performance
![Page 1: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October 2004 1
Sci-Fi Tracker Performance• Software Status
– RF background simulation
– Beam simulation– Reconstruction– Data sample
• Expected performance• Performance• Emittance calculation• Summary
![Page 2: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
RF Background Simulation
• As described by Rikard at VC of 22/9/04• Software used from tag mice-0-9-10• Background generated in 100 jobs of 100
events each on CSF farm at RAL.• Total time to produce 10k events on CSF
was over 4 days!• Output files merged into one file that is then
used as input for each of the 10k event samples.
![Page 3: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
TURTLE Beam
• Added as G4MICE option• In CVS as tag mice-0-9-11• 720,000 events produced using the “June04”
configuration were provided by Kevin Tilley• Sample broken up into 72 sets of 10,000
events each for submission as jobs on CSF farm at RAL
![Page 4: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Reconstruction
• TDC aspect of Digitisation is now more realistic (exact details of discriminators still to be perfected).
• Duplets (space point made from 2 views in a station) are now reconstructed and used in the pattern recognition.
• Individual clusters are used as separate measurements in the Kalman track fit.
• Still need to add the use of a field map (particularly with the more detailed simulation now in use) – currently assuming a fixed field!
![Page 5: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Data Sample
• Four sets of events processed:– Various sets of 20k events to study effects of multiple
scattering, non-uniform field, etc...– 720k events with all physics processes, but no RF
background– 720k events with all physics processes and overlaid
RF background events– 7k events with 100x nominal RF background
• All performance plots are from the sample with nominal RF and all physics processes.
• A summary table at the end will show differences between performance with and without RF background
![Page 6: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Expected Performance
• Expected momentum resolution based on “back of the envelope” calculations.
• Determine effect that multiple scattering will have on resolution.
• Predict resolution as a function of PT and PZ
![Page 7: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
No Multiple Scattering - PT
R
R
PT = Q B · R
PT = 0.52 MeV/c
PT / PT = R / R
PT = Q B R R / R
PT = 1.202 x R
R = 0.431 mm
R = 0.427 * 3.5 / √12
![Page 8: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
PT Resolution• From the previous slide, it is
clear that the PT resolution should be flat as a function of PT: PT = Q B R
• So long as the track does not have an excessively high PZ (resulting in the projection in XY being a small fraction of a circle), the PT resolution should also be flat in PZ
![Page 9: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
No Multiple Scattering - PZ
z
PZ = PT / tan()
tan() = d / dz
![Page 10: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
PZ Resolution• PZ = PT / tan()• The resolution in depends on the
radius of curvature: tan() = k / PT
• Therefore the uncertainty on PZ depends on the uncertainty in PT (which is fixed) and that in tan() in quadrature
• For cases of High PT, or Low PZ, the resolution in PT will dominate over the resolution in tan():
PZ = PZ x PT / PT
• High PT (100 MeV/c): PZ = 0.52 / 100 x 225 = 1.15 MeV/c
• Low PZ (150 MeV/c): PZ = 0.52 / 50 x 150 = 1.56 MeV/c
PZ2 = k1
2 + (k2 + k3 PZ)2
PZ2 = (k1 / PT)2 + k2
2
![Page 11: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
With Multiple Scattering
V X W
ms
z = 1.9 mm
X0 = 42 cm → x/X0 = 0.45%
ms = √2 x 13.6 MeV / cp x 0.053
100 < p < 350 MeV/c
68.76 < cp < 335.1 MeV
3.1 < ms < 14.9 mrad
Not to scale!
![Page 12: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Point Resolution with MCS
• 3.1 < ms < 14.9 mrad
• Station is 1.9 mm thick
• Mean total momentum is 240 MeV/c, giving a typical ms = 5 mrad.
• MCS produces additional error on the point resolution of between 6 and 30 m.
• MCS has no appreciable effect on the resolution of measuring an individual point
![Page 13: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Multiple Scattering - PT
Typical distance between planes
= 175 mm
Error on position = 175 * 5 mrad
= 0.875 mm
Resolution in R becomes 0.97 mm
PT = 1.202 x R
PT = 1.16 MeV/c
![Page 14: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Multiple Scattering - PZ
• For case of high PT and high P, expect PZ to depend just on new PT:PZ = PZ x PT / PT
= 160 x 1.16 / 100
= 1.86 MeV/c
• In general, the effects of multiple scattering will increase as P drops, so expect resolution to approach no multiple scattering level at high P and PT, and get worse as the momentum drops.
![Page 15: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Performance• Position resolution
– X, Y
• Momentum pulls– PX, PY and PZ
• Momentum resolution– PT, PZ
– PT versus PT, PT vs PZ
– PZ versus PT, PZ vs PZ
• “Primes” resolution– X’, Y’, T’
• Efficiency and Purity
![Page 16: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
X Position Resolution
RMS = 48.49 mm RMS = 0.391 mm
![Page 17: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Y Position Resolution
RMS = 57.05 mm RMS = 0.392 mm
![Page 18: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
PX PY and PZ Pulls
![Page 19: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
PT Resolution
RMS = 28.65 MeV/c RMS = 1.75 MeV/c
![Page 20: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
PZ Resolution
RMS = 25.65 MeV/c RMS = 2.41 MeV/c
![Page 21: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Resolution vs PT
![Page 22: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Resolution vs PZ
![Page 23: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
X’ Resolution
RMS = 182.1 mrad RMS = 8.00 mrad
![Page 24: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Y’ Resolution
RMS = 172.3 mrad RMS = 7.91 mrad
![Page 25: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
T’ Resolution
RMS = 5.48 x 10-2 RMS = 5.06 x 10-3
![Page 26: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Efficiency vs PT
![Page 27: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Efficiency vs PZ
![Page 28: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Efficiency vs PT / PZ
![Page 29: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Purity vs PT
![Page 30: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Purity vs PZ
![Page 31: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
Purity vs PT / PZ
![Page 32: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
Emittance Calculation
• Analysis code developed by Chris:– Trace and phase space– Monte Carlo truth, reconstructed parameters, virtual
planes, ICOOL output files...– Can calculate 2D, 4D, 6D emittance, apply cuts, re-
weighting, etc...– Performance checked against ecalc9f
• For each 10,000 event run, calculate one value of emittance from Monte Carlo truth information and one from reconstructed track information.
• Determine resolution and bias in 4D (XY) emittance (TOF unavailable, hence no 6D emittance).
![Page 33: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
Emittance Resolution
![Page 34: Sci-Fi Tracker Performance](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062321/56813fea550346895daadee6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
RMS of True
RMS resolution (no RF)
RMS resolution (with RF)
RMS resolution (100x RF)
% RMS/RMS (no RF)
% RMS/RMS (with RF)
% RMS/RMS (100x RF)
X (mm) 48.49 0.390 0.391 0.384 0.80 0.81 0.79
Y (mm) 57.05 0.391 0.392 0.389 0.69 0.69 0.68
PT (MeV/c)
28.65 1.75 1.75 1.69 6.11 6.11 5.90
PZ (MeV/c)
25.65 2.41 2.41 2.43 9.40 9.40 9.47
X’ (mrad)
182.1 8.02 8.00 8.08 4.40 4.39 4.44
Y’ (mrad)
172.3 7.90 7.91 7.58 4.59 4.59 4.40
t’ (x10-3)
5.48 0.506 0.506 0.519 9.23 9.23 9.47
Efficiency in % Efficiency out % Purity in % Purity out % 4D bias % 4D resolution %
No RF 99.99(85) 99.81(17) 99.15(12) 99.17(66) -0.121 0.060
With RF 99.99(85) 99.83(43) 99.13(14) 99.17(57) -0.138 0.062
100x RF 100.(00) 99.(73) 95.(28) 96.(47) N/A N/A
Performance Summary: