Schutte CFA Society of Nebraska Final.ppt Calendar/Attachme… · 12-02-2014 · Presentation To:...
Transcript of Schutte CFA Society of Nebraska Final.ppt Calendar/Attachme… · 12-02-2014 · Presentation To:...
February 12, 2014
Presentation To:CFA Society of Nebraska
Tactical Asset Allocation & Financial Market Outlook2014 – The Year the Fed Finally Gets What it Wants
Presented by:
Brent Schutte, CFA, CFP®
Senior Investment Strategist & PMMulti-Asset Solutions Group312-461-3192
Investment Process Overview
Combining Strategic and Tactical Allocations
Strategic Asset Allocation: The Efficient Frontier10 – 25 Year Structural Risk & Secular Return Outlook (Reviewed Annually)Drivers - Potential GDP / Valuation / Political Risk / Inflation Forecasts / DemographicsEfficient Allocation of Assets Based upon Risk, Return & Correlation – Drives Client ExperienceEvolutionary - Investigate & Add Asset Classes that Shift the Efficient Frontier Northwest
Tactical Asset Allocation:12 – 18 Month + Cyclical Outlook (Reviewed Constantly)Drivers – Fiscal & Monetary Policy / Event Risk / Valuation & MomentumRisk Management – Rising Correlations / Return Enhancement
Recommend trades when change in inputs or expected value of the opportunity set is largeenough to cover trading & Implementation costs
1
Strategic & Tactical Asset Allocati0n
• 1) Strategic Asset Allocation & The Efficient Frontier - Someone wins a Nobel Prize and it morphs into an “investment law”. It’s an important concept and a starting point for investment decisions but is it a complete investment process? Is going to zero allowed or must you always own all “Strategic” Asset Classes? Does this “protect you” and provide enough diversification & risk mgmt.?
Understanding an optimizer and its sensitivities
What variables are consistent
Setting a framework of minimums & maximums
• 2) Tactical Asset Allocation – This is risky...right? What is risk – Deviation from a benchmark? Hint: Who was taking more risk in the summer of 2012, someone who owned European Stocks or someone who didn’t. If you had to write down what you believe to be your three or four biggest risks, would your portfolios reflect those risks?
What is real and what is artificial? What you can “predict” and what you can’t
Making trade-offs
Building in hedges
The efficient frontier is constantly changing
2
Asset Classes Current Alternative Current Alternative Current Alternative Current Alternative Current AlternativeUS Large Cap Equity 0.0% 11.2% 19.7% 9.4% 30.9% 10.2% 39.4% 12.3% 50.6% 15.6%US Small/Mid Equity 0.0% 1.2% 6.6% 5.8% 10.3% 13.2% 13.1% 19.6% 16.9% 29.3%Developed Intl Large Equity 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 7.8% 8.3% 9.5% 10.5% 10.8% 13.5% 13.6%Developed Intl Small Equity 0.0% 6.7% 1.8% 0.6% 2.8% 1.5% 3.5% 3.6% 4.5% 7.0%Emerging Market Equity 0.0% 4.8% 1.8% 7.7% 2.8% 12.9% 3.5% 15.0% 4.5% 15.0%Municipal Bonds 90.0% 46.7% 65.0% 45.9% 45.0% 36.6% 30.0% 27.0% 10.0% 9.6%US High Yield Bonds 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0%REITS 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Commodities 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0%Cash 10.0% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Expected Return 5.33% 6.36% 6.48% 6.72% 7.04% 7.23% 7.46% 7.65% 8.02% 8.23%Risk 6.31% 6.31% 7.24% 7.24% 9.01% 9.01% 10.75% 10.75% 13.37% 13.37%Sharpe 0.24 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.38 0.34 0.36 0.32 0.33
Max. GrowthCapital Preservation Current Income Balanced Capital Growth
Asset Classes Current Alternative Current Alternative Current Alternative Current Alternative Current AlternativeUS Large Cap Equity 0.0% 11.2% 19.7% 12.9% 30.9% 14.5% 39.4% 17.4% 50.6% 21.8%US Small/Mid Equity 0.0% 1.2% 6.6% 4.4% 10.3% 11.7% 13.1% 18.2% 16.9% 27.3%Developed Intl Large Equity 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 10.5% 0.0% 13.5% 0.0%Developed Intl Small Equity 0.0% 6.7% 1.8% 5.1% 2.8% 7.0% 3.5% 10.0% 4.5% 14.8%Emerging Market Equity 0.0% 4.8% 1.8% 7.8% 2.8% 13.2% 3.5% 15.0% 4.5% 15.0%Municipal Bonds 90.0% 46.7% 65.0% 46.7% 45.0% 38.6% 30.0% 29.1% 10.0% 11.1%US High Yield Bonds 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%REITS 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Commodities 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0%Cash 10.0% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Expected Return 5.33% 6.36% 6.48% 6.71% 7.04% 7.22% 7.46% 7.64% 8.02% 8.22%Risk 6.31% 6.31% 7.24% 7.24% 9.01% 9.01% 10.75% 10.75% 13.37% 13.37%Sharpe 0.24 0.41 0.37 0.40 0.36 0.38 0.34 0.36 0.32 0.33
Capital Growth Max. GrowthCapital Preservation Current Income Balanced
Increase Intl Equity Return by
25 bps
Source: BMO Private Bank 2007 Capital Markets Assumptions & Optimization Review
FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY
The Efficient Frontier & Strategic Asset AllocationMixing the Art & Science
3
An Optimizer makes trade-offs between
Risk vs. Return & Correlation.
Question: How do we think of
our forecasts & trade-offs to determine minimums.
Answer: Test for which forecasts are historically
persistent.
The S&P 500 has outperformed the Emerging Markets
during various rolling 10 year
periods.
Testing for Persistency Return Patterns are Not Persistent / Risk is Persistent
4
The S&P 500 has a persistently lower standard deviation
than Emerging Markets over rolling
10 year periods.
Minimum Variance High Volatility Portfolio
Summary:
Returns Shift / Risk is Persistent / Correlations Rising?
Conclusion
Solving by using the Apparent Constant Variable - Standard Deviation
Minimum Variance Portfolio
Assumptions: All Asset Classes Same Expected Return - Solve for Recommended Portfolio
No Constraints
Partially Constrained
Fully Constrained Mins
S&P 500 33.6% S&P 500 59.7% S&P 500 57.7%Russell 2500 0.0% Russell 2500 0.0% Russell 2500 1.8% 1.8%
EAFE Large Cap 0.0% EAFE Large Cap 2.8% EAFE Large Cap 3.1% 2.3%EAFE Small Cap 0.0% EAFE Small Cap 7.5% EAFE Small Cap 6.2% 1.1%Emerging Markets 0.0% Emerging Markets 0.0% Emerging Markets 1.1% 1.1%
REITS 20.4% REITS 15.0% REITS 15.0%Commodities 46.0% 11.71% Commodities 15.0% 13.10% Commodities 15.0% 13.18%
* Partially Constrained ‐ Only Commodities & REITs are constrained at 15% Maximum ‐ 0 Minimum on each asset class** Fully Constrained ‐ All Current Model Constraints are Included (Minimums & Maximums on each asset class) . This forces the Optimizer to put some in each asset class.
5
Broad Asset Classes“Benefits Still Available”
Year S&P 500 Barclays Aggregate Bond
GSCI Commodity S&P 500 Barclays
Aggregate BondGSCI
Commodity1976 23.68% 15.60% -11.92%1977 -7.31% 3.03% 10.37% # Positive Years 30 35 271978 6.56% 1.40% 31.61% # Negative Years 7 2 101979 18.65% 1.92% 33.81%1980 32.45% 2.71% 11.08% Negative Years 2008 1994 20081981 -4.97% 6.26% -23.01% (In order of 2002 1999 19981982 21.55% 32.64% 11.56% Severity): 2001 20011983 22.56% 8.37% 16.26% 2000 19811984 6.19% 15.15% 1.05% 1977 20061985 31.73% 22.13% 10.01% 1981 19971986 18.67% 15.25% 2.04% 19931987 5.25% 2.76% 23.77% 19761988 16.61% 7.88% 27.93% 19911989 31.69% 14.53% 38.28% 20111990 -3.10% 8.95% 29.08% # of Years At Least 1 Asset Negative 161991 30.46% 16.00% -6.13% # of Years At Least 2 Assets Negative 31992 7.62% 7.40% 4.42% # of Years All 3 Assets Negative 01993 10.08% 9.75% -12.33%1994 1.32% -2.92% 5.29%1995 37.58% 18.48% 20.33%1996 22.96% 3.61% 33.92%1997 33.36% 9.68% -14.07%1998 28.58% 8.67% -35.75% Stocks and Bonds 0.221999 21.04% -0.83% 40.92%2000 -9.11% 11.63% 49.74% -0.032001 -11.88% 8.42% -31.93%2002 -22.10% 10.27% 32.07% 0.162003 28.68% 4.11% 20.72%2004 10.88% 4.34% 17.28%2005 4.91% 2.43% 25.55%2006 15.79% 4.33% -15.09%2007 5.49% 6.96% 32.67%2008 -37.93% 6.04% -46.49%2009 26.46% 5.93% 28.23%2010 15.06% 6.56% 9.03%2011 2.11% 7.84% -1.18%2012 16.00% 4.21% 0.08%
Source: Zephyr. Data: 12/31/1975 - 12/31/12 / Table 1102
Benefits of Asset Allocation: Diversification
Why did down years in one asset class tend to occur while the other two were rising? These asset classes are largely independent of each other:
Bonds and Commodities
Stocks and Commodities
Correlation Between…
Diversification is not dead…it is just not defined correctly and
relied upon too heavily by most.
6
Meeting our Typical Clients NeedsThe Negative Wealth Effects of Volatility
As you increase the deviation you increase the variability of end outcomes and lower the most likely ending wealth value.
This study is understated because individuals usually take dollar amounts not % amounts (& 3% is low). Once a standard of living (dollar based) is established it is hard to cut back. This is further understated because it also assumes annual draws – not monthly or quarterly.
Ending Portfolio Value with Same Return but Different Standard Deviation
Assumptions: 1mm Initial Value Maximum Growth Portfolio / 3% Inflation / 3% Draw Rate Per Annum / 7.28% Return
Year 10 Year 20 Year 30
Standard Deviation Standard Deviation Standard Deviation13.65% 15% 17% 13.65% 15% 17% 13.65% 15% 17%
% ile % ile % ile10% 2,292,947 2,349,818 2,497,759 10% 3,893,001 4,022,313 4,303,757 10% 6,186,669 6,498,002 7,043,03850% 1,376,053 1,346,718 1,312,500 50% 1,880,302 1,812,281 1,739,122 50% 2,576,696 2,449,229 2,263,60290% 824,003 772,729 700,780 90% 909,000 818,763 714,419 90% 1,057,297 921,056 768,325
7
Strategic Asset AllocationA Long-Term Foundation
Strategic Asset Allocation or Efficient Frontier – Beta and other risk measures between asset classes work well in the longer term. Strategic Asset Allocation
provides A LONG-TERM FOUNDATION & STARTING POINT. Realize the ASSUMPTIONS that are embedded in it.
Have constraints (at the highest levels) built in to your process but allow flexibility...Some asset classes have stronger diversification benefits & should be treated accordingly. Other asset classes should be allowed to go to zero during
extraordinary time periods.
8
Tactical Asset AllocationTools to Manage Risk in the Short to Intermediate Term
• Understand the Current Market Environment – what is priced in vs. what isn’t....what is real and what isn’t. If an artificial tailwind goes away, you are left with valuation to bail you out. (Stocks vs. Bonds, Emerging Market & High Yield Bonds, REITs etc.).
• Define Current Risks - A Fed experiment gone wrong....a currency union breaking up....middle east strife.
• Hedge/Own Risks – Diversification means owning something that will help protect you if the risk comes true. (Inverse treasury/ commodities/ currency hedge).
• Weigh Risk vs. Reward – The reward may be large, but what about the downside...is there a “safer way to get the exposure”. Make trade-offs.
• Context - Convey to your clients what you are attempting to do & why it is important (risk adjusted returns!). Managing Client emotions and keeping them “in the game and on path” is a huge part of our jobs. Yes- you will be wrong sometimes so COMMUNICATE.
9
Context – Communication & Current Outlook“Normalization” Leads To Volatility
10
Today’s Agenda
• The economy is improving and could be accelerating over the coming quarters. Foreign economic headwinds are declining and most importantly US political dysfunction may have reached a peak.
• The taper needs to continue and you shouldn’t fear it.... A steeper yield curve may actually help the economy. The Fed has successfully convinced the market of their “new policy” of anchoring short term rates at 0 for longer.
• We’ve been saying it for years but find it worth repeating frequently. Globalization will be a tailwind to an increasingly cost competitive US labor force.
• Bonds are for cash needs only and not for returns. Investors should position accordingly.
• We continue to overweight the US but returns going forward will increasingly require economic growth. FCF remains large and is a downside buffer.
• We continue to advise employing currency hedged vehicles when allocating to EAFE developed....will the last auto company out of Australia please turn off the lights.
• The Fed is guaranteeing they are going to stick around too long and we believe its likely they will get too much of a good thing...might the next recession be caused by a sharp removal of policy in the future? Until then we continue to overweight risk assets.
11
Expect More VolatilityWill 2013/14 approximate the 2003/04 Script?
The 10 Year Treasury rose 1.5% (from 3.11%) …fell back nearly 1% and then rose again 1.2%, etc….before
ultimately climbing into the 5s by 2006.
The equity markets experienced three sell-
off in excess of 5%.
12
EconomyPutting Some of the Recent “Weak” Data in Context
Yes the ISM weakened in January but this forward
looking component remained strong.
As an aside This was a very good
leading indicator before the 1974 and
2008 recessions
13
ISM New Orders Less Inventories Led 9 Months-5 or Less 0 to -5 0 to 5 5 to 12 12 to 16 16 to 20 20+
Median YOY GDP -1.8 0.5 2.15 3.3 4.1 3.8 3.4Average YOY GDP -1.5 0.8 1.7 3.3 3.9 4.1 4.0# of Observations 20 54 80 227 92 53 25# of Negative GDP Prints 15 20 19 7 1 1 0# Less than 2% GDP Growth 20 38 37 42 9 4 3Maximum 1.7 4.6 5.8 7.6 8 8.5 6.2Minimum -4.1 -4.1 -3.5 -1.6 -0.2 -0.2 1.6
EconomyHeadwinds Abating
Fiscal Headwinds will likely abate in 2014.
14
Europe and Japan continue to abate as
headwinds. We continue to expect the ECB to pick
up the stimulus slack...
The US Consumer – Healthier than AdvertisedTotal Debt Includes Principal & Interest
Yes the US consumer was over-indebted
but it was over-stated.
A simple math example to explain our
contention with a chart that has gotten too much
press.
15
The US Consumer – Healthier than Advertised Monthly Cash Flow Relief
The interest rate experiment that the Fed
is running has kept rates low and help
improved the cash flow health of the US
consumer.
72% of HH Debt is Mortgage Debt...Given
our interest rate outlook, this is the right
decision and likely speaks to housing
affordability.
16
EmploymentSmall Business is Ramping Up
We believe the BLS reports have been
heavily skewed by weather
(ADP).
This indicator pushed to closer
to “normal levels”...
Additionally sales
expectations spiked.
17
Labor Markets Tightening?The Fed May Have less Slack then They Believe
Monetary policy can’t cure structural
unemployment…only education and training can....these take time.
18
The Fed acknowledges the structural
commentary but points to little wage pressure. We watch these indicators
intently and believe wage pressures/inflation will
emerge.
Fiscal & Economic Policies - EntitlementsIncentives are Crucial to Labor Supply & Capital Accumulation
Eliminating Deductions
“If some capital investments receive more favorable tax treatment than others, additional resources will be directed to those types of investments even if other types would be more productive. The limit on itemized deductions for home mtg. interest & property taxes….raising the effective tax on owner-occupied housing closer to that on business investments…..ADDS .07% TO REAL GNP by 2022
Source: CBO – The Economic Impact of the President’s 2013 Budget
Incentives to Supply Labor
“……the government’s budgetary policies affect potential output primarily by affecting the amount of public saving (deficit = negative public saving) and the incentives for individuals to work, save and invest.”
19
Business InvestmentWashington Dysfunction has Peaked
Small business owners have been citing
regulation and the uncertain political
environment as reasons to not expand business
investment.
20
While it is a small step forward, we have a
budget and debt ceiling deal. The “unkowns” of the ACA are becoming
knowns.
Business InvestmentThe Next Stage of US Growth may be led by Investment
Companies are flush with cash they have been hoarding....The old age of the
plants at the left meets the reality
that manufacturing is moving back to
the US.
21
A Positive US BackdropThe Energy Situation is Friendly to Employment & Commodity Prices
22
The Globe and Mail – Oct , 7 2013 “But it isn’t just clothing and textiles. More
than half of U.S. executives at manufacturers with sales of at least $1-billion (U.S.) say
they are planning to repatriate some production to the United States from China, according to an August survey by Boston Consulting Group. Respondents cited
factors such as proximity to customers, product quality and lower transportation costs, competitive wage rates and skilled
labour.”.
Surprise!The “Pie” is Bigger - Globalization is a US Tailwind
A rising currency increases
purchasing power and improves
citizen’s lives.
23
China is serious about re-balancing its economy....while
GDP may be slowing - wealth is
growing.
Current Market Realities Experimental Policies & Asymmetric Inflation Tolerance
“No Central Banker anywhere on the planet has the experience of successfully navigating a return home from the place in which we now find ourselves.”
Richard FisherPresident Dallas Federal Reserve
24
The BEGINNING of the End?Hide in the Front End – “Replace” the Intermediate /Long End
While tapering began in December, it could be years before the
yield curve fully normalizes...the Fed wants the front end
anchored!
A steeper yield would likely help coax out excess
bank reserves. A QE exit should push up
long term rates.
25
Lower Volatility Higher Volatility
Short Duration Intermediate Duration Long Duration1-3/4 Year Duration 3/4-10 Year Duration
“Maturity” Focus Inflation Protection
Lower Price Risk Diversification Benefits
Municipal Bonds Market Neutral Investment Grade Bonds Convertible Arbitrage
Merger ArbitrageAbsolute StrategiesCovered Call StrategiesHigh Yield BondsLeveraged / Bank LoansInternational DebtConvertible BondsStructured NotesLong/ Short Equity
Preferred Stock
10 Year + Duration
Return Focused
Retirement Funding
Long Equity (U.S and Foreign)CommoditiesREITSHedge FundsPrivate Equity
Don’t Sell Everything but Think DifferentlyFilling the Bond Void
Investors Must “Accept” Low to Negative Real Yields in Return for Cash Flow
Certainty & Risk Management
With Negative Real Returns Likely, Investors Need to Find
“Substitute” Investments for this Part of the Curve
26
27
BMO Multi-Asset Income FundReplacing the Bond Void – A Dual Mandate of Inflation Protection & Income
US Equity Market ValuationsSomewhere Near Fair Value – Growth Needed
This measure shows the market as slightly
above its median “inflation adjusted PE”.
28
There are earnings that get reported to
shareholders and then there are the ones that
you report to the government to pay taxes
off of.
US Equity ValuationGetting “Paid” to Wait for Earnings Growth
Earnings growth should accelerate....we believe it will be off the backs of increased revenue
rather than margin expansion.
29
CASH IS KING
Harley Davidson CFO John Olin,“we clearly are not going to be
funding the pension plan, so that excess cash can be returned to
our shareholders.”WSJ Feb 11
For those of you waiting for the dollar to collapse – it already happened (see 2002 to 2008).
Fact: Couple this with labor wage constraint & the US is now globally competitive....
Today’s Reality: Many Foreign central banks now want/need to use the same recipe. If Europe doesn’t it might break anyway.
Re-Entering/ Increasing EAFE but Hedging RiskOwn the Companies not the Currencies
30
CommoditiesPatience! - Supply & Demand Imbalance
Longer term and for diversification purposes commodities fill a portfolio role.However, tactically the asset class continues to be hampered by oversupply in many markets.
“The truth is that the China resource
boom is over.” Australian PM Kevin Rudd
31
32
Emerging Market ValuationIf a Contagion is Avoided They are Cheap
Emerging Markets have returned to discounts they traded at during the beginning of the century. If contagion is avoided, future outperformance may be in order.
Emerging MarketsLessons Learned from 1997 / 1998
We all cite the Asian Contagion but does anyone recall that Emerging sold off ferociously in 2004, only to
rally just as ferociously after contagion was
avoided.
33
While currency intervention isn’t the sole
answer, EM countries have bigger “war chests”
this go around. Dollar pegs have been
reduced.
34
Disclosure
Brent Schutte is a Senior Market Strategist for BMO Global Asset Management, a Part of BMO Financial Group.
BMO and BMO Financial Group are trade names used by Bank of Montreal. Insurance coverage is underwritten by a number of insurers. Insurance products are the obligation of the insurance company. Not all products and services are available in every state and/or location.
This is not intended to serve as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any company, industry or security. The opinions expressed here reflect our judgment at this date and are subject to change. Information has been obtained from sources we consider to be reliable, but we cannot guarantee the accuracy. This publication is prepared for general information only. This material does not constitute investment advice and is not intended as an endorsement of any specific investment. It does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. Investors should seek advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies discussed or recommended in this report and should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investment involves risk. Market conditions and trends will fluctuate. The value of an investment as well as income associated with investments may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less than originally invested. Investments cannot be made in an index. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance.
BMO Global Asset Management is the brand name for various affiliated entities of BMO Financial Group that provide trust, custody, securities lending, investment management, and retirement plan services. Certain of the products and services offered under the brand name BMO Global Asset Management are designed specifically for various categories of investors in a number of different countries and regions. Products and services are only offered to such investors in those countries and regions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. BMO Financial Group is a service mark of Bank of Montreal (BMO).
Investment products are: Not FDIC Insured – No Bank Guarantee – May Lose Value.©2013 BMO Financial Corp.