Schrödinger cat and EPR state with quantum opticsjila Workshop Breckenridge, CO, USA, Aug. 23-25,...
Transcript of Schrödinger cat and EPR state with quantum opticsjila Workshop Breckenridge, CO, USA, Aug. 23-25,...
US/Japan WorkshopBreckenridge, CO, USA, Aug. 23-25, 2006
Schrödinger cat and EPR statewith quantum optics
Akira FurusawaDepartment of Applied Physics
University of TokyoCREST, JST
A. Furusawa Univ. of TokyoT. Aoki, H. Yonezawa, K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, Y. Takeno, J. Yoshikawa, T. Kajiya, N. Lee, M. Yukawa, Y. Miwa, H. Uchigaito,J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen (NBI), N. Takei (ERATO)A. Huck (Erlangen)
M. Sasaki NICTM. Fujiwara, M. Takeoka, J. Hayase, A. Kitagawa, K. Tsujino
M. Ban Hitachi
S. L. Braunstein, P. van Loock, U. L. Andersen
Collaborators
Quantum opticsannihilation operator a
quantum complex amplitude
ˆ ˆ ˆa q ip= +q: cosine componentp: sine component
ˆ ˆ[ , ]2iq p =
†ˆ ˆ[ , ] 1a a = 12
⎛ ⎞=⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠h
ˆ ˆ[ , ]2ix p =
x: positionp: momentum
Photon-number units
α
p
time2/(pi) * exp(2*(-(x-x0)**2-(y-y0)**2))
-6-4
-20
24
6 -6-4
-20
24
6-0.6-0.4-0.2
00.20.40.6
xp
W(x, p)
Coherent states
x
Rotatingframe
Time evolution
Wigner function
αMinimum uncertainty state
Laser
2
2
0 !
n
ne n
n
α αα∞−
=
= ∑
a α α α=
Wigner function
Squeezed vacuumMinimum uncertainty state
( ) ( )
( )
2 † 2ˆ ˆ2
0
ˆ 0 0
2 !1 tanh 22 !cosh
r a a
nn
n
S r e
nr n
nr
−
∞
=
=
= ∑
( ) ( )† †ˆ ˆˆ ˆ ˆcosh sinh
ˆ ˆr r
S r a S r a r a r
e x ie p−
= −
= +
( )
2
2
2
0
2
0
!
!
n
n
n
n
e nn
e nn
α
α
αα
αα
∞−
=
∞−
=
=
−− =
∑
∑
22n 1
2
n 0e 2n 1
(2n 1)!
α αα α+∞−
=
− − = ++
∑
Schrödinger cat state
S. Lloyd, S.L. BraunsteinPRL 82, 1784 (1999)
Quantum informationprocessing
Unitary transformation
ψ ϕU ˆ
ˆ
Hi t
U
e
ϕ ψ
ψ−
=
= h
Arbitrary Hamiltonians ( polynomials of )
ˆ ˆ,x p
( )†ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ,x p i a aα α∗ −2 2 †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆx p a a+
( )†2 2ˆˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆxp px i a a+ −
( )† †1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆp x x p i a a a a− −
( ) ( )2 22 2 †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆx p a a+
(2)χ(3)χ
Beam splittersDisplace in phase spacePhase shifters
Squeezers
Kerr effect
ˆ ˆ ˆa x ip= +Gaussian operations
Non-Gaussian operations
Toward universal QIP
Quantum teleportation of non-Gaussian states
Schrödinger cat state
Time domain EPR correlation
A non-Gaussian input state
Resource for quantum teleportation
catψ α α− −
Output -Quantum teleportationInput
Output -Classical teleportation
Schrödinger cat1 ( 1.5 1.5 )2
− −
S. L. Braunstein & H. J. Kimble, PRL 80, 869 (1998).
Creation of Schrödinger cat statewith photon subtraction
K. Wakui, H. Takahashi, A. Furusawa, & M. Sasaki, CQIQCII-2006
( )
2
2
2
0
2
0
!
!
n
n
n
n
e nn
e nn
α
α
αα
αα
∞−
=
∞−
=
=
−− =
∑
∑
22n 1
2
n 0e 2n 1
(2n 1)!
α αα α+∞−
=
− − = ++
∑
Schrödinger cat state
Photon subtraction
even photons
KNbO3
Pulsed light: A. Ourjoumtsev et al., Science 312, 83 (2006).CW light: J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen et al., quant-ph/0602198.
OPO
( )0,0 0.026W = −
LO LO
odd photons
α α− −conditional homodynetomography
phasescan
• KNbO3
• Type-I non-critical phase-matching• Output coupler :
Optical Parametric Oscillator
430nm
KNbO3
Ti:S Squeezedvacuum
SHG
860nm
x
p
T 15%≅
Photon subtraction
Squeezed state
Squeezed state
Photon subtraction
Best result with KNbO3 without any correction
Photon subtraction
α α− −
even photons
odd photons
KNbO3PPKTP
OPO
conditional homodyne tomography
One of the results with PPKTP
without any correction
( )0,0 0.043W = −
W(0,0) = -0.075W(0,0) = W(0,0) = --0.0750.075
W(0,0) = -0.055W(0,0) = W(0,0) = --0.0550.055 W(0,0) = -0.043W(0,0) = W(0,0) = --0.0430.043
20mW20mW20mW
40mW40mW40mW
Pump Power: 10mWPump Power: 10mWPump Power: 10mW
30mW30mW30mW
W(0,0) = -0.059W(0,0) = W(0,0) = --0.0590.059
Time domain Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen(EPR) correlation
N. Takei, N. Lee, D. Moriyama, J. S. Neergaard-Nielsen, & A. Furusawa, quant-ph/0607091
Time-domain EPR correlation
( )Ax t
( )Bx t
( )Ap t
( )Bp t
x measurements
A AA( , )x p B BB( , )x p
[ ]A B A Bˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ, 0x x p p− + =
A BEPR dx x x∝ ∫
A B
A B
00
x xp p
− =+ =
Simultaneous eigenstates of ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) & ( )A B A Bx x p p− +
p measurements EPR beams in quantum optics
Mode matching to photon counting
• Ordinary teleportation experiment: side band
freq.
ΔΩΔΩ
+Ω−Ω 0
Ω Ω
• Broad band
freq.
ΔΩ
2ΔΩ
2ΔΩ
− 0
TΔ ≈Time resolution 1/bandwidth
cavity bandwidth
Generation of EPR beams
1/2R
Alice
Bob
x
p
(0) (0)1 2
B
(0) (0)1 2
B
ˆ ˆˆ2
ˆ ˆˆ2
r r
r r
e x e xx
e p e pp
−
−
−=
−=
(0)A B 1
(0)A B 2
ˆ ˆ ˆ2
ˆ ˆ ˆ2
r
r
x x e x
p p e pr
−
−
− =
+ = → ∞
Squeezed vacuum
(0) (0)1 2
A
(0) (0)1 2
A
ˆ ˆˆ2
ˆ ˆˆ2
r r
r r
e x e xx
e p e pp
−
−
+=
+=
“EPR noise” “EPR correlation”
0
( )HBS A B A B
† †A B A B A B
2A B
0
ˆ ˆˆ ( ) ( ) 0 0
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆexp 0 0
1 n
n
B S r S r
r a a a a
q q n n∞
=
− ⊗
⎡ ⎤= − ⊗⎣ ⎦
= − ⊗∑tanhq r=
2A B
0
1 n
n
q q n n∞
=
− ⊗∑
r → ∞
A B A B0n
n n dx x x∞ ∞
−∞=
=∑ ∫
x
p
p
x
Generation of EPR beams
Experimental setup
430nm
860nm
Ti:S
Doubler
OPO1
OPO2
Squeezedvacuum
LO
Bob
50%R
Optical Parametric Oscillator• KNbO3• Type-I non-critical
phase-matching• Output coupler : ~13%
ADC PC
Alice
LO
LO
ADC
Alice
Bob
50%R
ADC PC
LO
LO
Cavity lock
Cavity lock
Probe
Probe
Experimental setup
ADC
x or p
x or p
Alice
Bob
50%R
LO
LOlock
lock
lock
Cavity lock
Cavity lock
Probe
Probe
Experimental setup
ADC PC
ADC
Alice
Bob
50%R
LO
LOhold
hold
hold
Cavity lock
Cavity lock
Probe
Probe
Experimental setup
ADC PC
ADC
Alice
Bob
50%R
LO
LOhold
hold
hold
Cavity lock
Cavity lock
Probe
Probe
Experimental setup
ADC PC
ADC
Alice
Bob
50%R
LO
LOhold
hold
hold
Cavity lock
Cavity lock
Probe
Probe
Experimental setup
ADC PC
ADC
50MS/sec for 2msec (100000pts)Quadrature values =10pts average (averaged for 200nsec) 5kHzHPF
AliceBob
p measurements
x measurementsTime domain EPR correlation
2A Bˆ ˆ[ ( ) ] 3dBp pΔ + ≈ −
p correlationx correlation
2ˆ ˆ[ ( ) ] 3dBA Bx xΔ − ≈ −
PPKTP
No BLIIRA!
Trying to get more squeezing
-7dB squeezing
7.2 0.2 dB− ±
S. Suzuki, H. Yonezawa, F. Kannari, M. Sasaki, & A. Furusawa, APL 89, 061116 (2006).
Pump power dependence of squeezing
Theoretical squeezing level calculated from G+ and lossestaking account of the phase fluctuation of the LO
3.9θ = o%
2 2cos sinS S ASθ θ′ = +% %
RMS
Requirements for high-level squeezing
-14dB -12dB
-10dB
intra-cavity lossof OPO fluctuation of LO phase
squeezing
0.0063.9
Lθ
== o%
For -7.2dB
Requirements for high-level squeezing
-14dB -12dB
-10dB
intra-cavity lossof OPO fluctuation of LO phase
squeezing
0.0042.0
Lθ
== o%
Present
We should have -9dB!!
-12
-9
-6
-3
0
3
6
9
12
15
18
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.108.3 0.2 dB− ±
0.0042.0
Lθ
== o%
Present
Time domain EPR correlation
Non-Gaussian states
Quantum teleportation of non-Gaussian states
Near future
Schrödinger cat state