School Improvement Plan Presentation 2010-2011 Creating Bridges Inspiring Success.
-
Upload
lucas-julson -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of School Improvement Plan Presentation 2010-2011 Creating Bridges Inspiring Success.
Custer Baker Intermediate
School
School Improvement Plan Presentation
2010-2011
Creating Bridges Inspiring Success
School Improvement Team
Grade Level Teams
Building-Based Student Team (BBST)
School Steering Committee
Department Chairs
Parent Support
Administration/Counseling/Support Staff
CBIS Leadership Teams
ISTEP+Language Arts Trend Data
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
2015 (Current 8th Grade)
0.890000000000002
0.860000000000001
0.840000000000001
0.830000000000001
2016 (Current 7th Grade)
0.880000000000002
0.830000000000001
0.81 0.830000000000001
2017 (Current 6th Grade)
0.880000000000002
0.820000000000001
0.820000000000001
NaN
2018 (Current 5th Grade)
0.890000000000002
0.860000000000001
NaN NaN
73%
78%
83%
88%
93%
98%
General Education StudentsP
assin
g I
STEP
+
ISTEP+Math Trend Data
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
2015 (Current 8th Grade)
0.850000000000001
0.830000000000001
0.820000000000001
0.78
2016 (Current 7th Grade)
0.860000000000001
0.870000000000002
0.820000000000001
0.8
2017 (Current 6th Grade)
0.8 0.700000000000001
0.740000000000002
NaN
2018 (Current 5th Grade)
0.8 0.78 NaN NaN
68%73%78%83%88%93%98%
General Education StudentsP
assin
g I
STEP
+
ISTEP+ Language Arts Trend Data
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
2015 (Current 8th Grade)
0.49 0.48 0.28 0.35
2016 (Current 7th Grade)
0.44 0.320000000000001
0.380000000000001
0.390000000000001
2017 (Current 6th Grade)
0.51 0.330000000000001
0.310000000000001
NaN
2018 (Current 5th Grade)
0.46 0.44 NaN NaN
5%
25%
45%
Special Education StudentsP
assin
g IS
TEP
+
The percentage of special education students passing Language Arts ISTEP+ will improve by 5% as measured by the 2010-11 ISTEP+ assessment
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade) From 31% to 36%
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade) From 44% to 49%
ISTEP +Special Education LA Goal
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)
31%
44%36%
49%42%
37%
Percent Of Students Passing LA ISTEP+
2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION
ISTEP Special Education LA GoalSTATUS
ISTEP+ Math Trend Data
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
2015 (Current 8th Grade) 0.56 0.42 0.44 0.47
2016 (Current 7th Grade) 0.54 0.5 0.45 0.47
2017 (Current 6th Grade) 0.54 0.36 0.26 NaN
2018 (Current 5th Grade) 0.54 0.41 NaN NaN
5%15%25%35%45%55%
Special Education StudentsP
assin
g I
STEP
+
The percentage of special education students passing Math ISTEP will improve by 5% as measured by the 2010-11 ISTEP+ assessment
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)From 26% to 31%
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)From 41% to 46%
ISTEP +Special Education Math
Goal
ISTEP Special Education Math Goal
STATUS
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)
26%
41%
31%
46%
37%34%
Percent Of Students Passing ISTEP+
2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION
Special Ed Program Adjustments
2009 -10 2010 -11Discovery Team – 2 Teachers
Discovery Team – 3 Teachers
2 Block Rotation 3 Block Rotation
120 Minutes Math 120 Minutes EDM
Compass Learning
UNCHANGED
150 Minutes of Reading/Language Arts
Science/Social Studies - 45 Minutes
Small Classes
Exploratory / Lunch / Recess
ISTEP+ Language Arts Trend Data
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
2015 (Current 8th Grade) 0.1 0.08 0.07 0.15
2016 (Current 7th Grade) 0.15 0.09 0.1 0.21
2017 (Current 6th Grade) 0.16 0.15 0.21 NaN
2018 (Current 5th Grade) 0.12 0.13 NaN NaN
3%
8%
13%
18%
23%
PASS PLUSP
assin
g I
STEP
Pass P
lus
The percentage of students scoring Pass Plus on the 2011 ISTEP + assessment in Language Arts will increase by 5% as compared to the 2010 ISTEP+ test.
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade) From 21% to 26%
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade) From 13% to 18%
ISTEP Pass Plus Language Arts Goal
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)
21%
13%
26%
18%
24%21%
Percent Scoring Pass Plus in Language Arts
2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION
ISTEP Pass Plus LA GoalSTATUS
ISTEP+ Math Trend Data
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6
2015 (Current 8th Grade) 0.18 0.15 0.15 0.11
2016 (Current 7th Grade) 0.17 0.18 0.17 0.11
2017 (Current 6th Grade) 0.06 0.03 0.05 NaN
2018 (Current 5th Grade) 0.27 0.17 NaN NaN
3%8%
13%18%23%28%
PASS PLUSP
assin
g I
STEP
Pass P
lus
The percentage of students scoring Pass Plus on the 2011 ISTEP + assessment in Math will increase by 5% as compared to the 2010 ISTEP+ test.
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade) From 5% to 10%
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade) From 17% to 22%
ISTEP Pass Plus Math Goal
Class of 2017 (Current 6th Grade)
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)
5%
17%
10%
22%20%
30%
Percent Scoring Pass Plus in Math
2009-10 2010-11 GOAL2010-11 PROJECTION
ISTEP Pass Plus Math GoalSTATUS
The percent of students with a RIT score at or above
the grade level norm (50th %ile) will increase from:
65% in the Spring of 2010 to
70% in the Spring of 2011
as measured by the NWEA Reading MAP test.
NWEA Reading Goal
NWEA Reading GoalSTATUS
Met30%
70%
Class of 2017 (Current 6th
Grade)
Met33%
67%
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)
Percent of Students Who Have Met Their Yearly Achievement Goal by The Winter NWEA Test
The percent of students with a RIT score at or above the grade level norm (50th %ile) will increase from:
56% in the Spring of 2010 to
70% in the Spring of 2011
as measured by the NWEA Math MAP test.
NWEA Math Goal
Met43%
57%
Class of 2017 (Current 6th
Grade)
NWEA Math GoalSTATUS
Met33%
67%
Class of 2018 (Current 5th Grade)
Percent of Students Who Have Met Their Yearly Achievement Goal by The Winter NWEA Test
RTI -Response to Instruction
“Grizz Time”
Students participate according to proficiency level (remediation to enrichment)
45 minutes daily
Target 4 language arts & 4 math skills
Pre and post test
Data teams identify strategies
Response to Instruction (RTI)
Response to Instruction
Tier 2
5-10%
Tier 1
80-90%
Services across tiers are fluid and data-driven.
Team Behavior Logs, Counseling Services, On-Level Celebrations, Positive Phone Calls, School-wide Discipline Plan
Core Curriculum, Scott Foresman, Everyday Math, Team Book Clubs, Compass Learning, On-Level Celebrations, Data Teams
Tier 31-5%
Scott Foresman, Every day Math, BBST, Compass Learning, Literacy League – Title I, Leveled Readers, Discovery Team, Data Teams
One on One with Administration, Sensory Room, Counseling Services, Functional Behavior Assessment, Check In/Out, BBST, ACT Services Referral, Possible Referral to Adult & Child, Required Parent Conference, Hot Pass, School-wide Discipline Plan
Scott Foresman Sidewalks, Compass Learning, Discovery Team
Sensory Room, Behavior Coach, Functional Behavior Assessment, Investigate Special Services Referral, School-wide Discipline Plan
646 Students currently receiving RTI Tier I 96 - 6th grade band students (daily)
112 Students in Tier 2
35 Students in Tier 3
12 Students with RTI behavior plans Students move among Grizz time (RTI) classes based on pre and post test scores for targeted skills.
RTI Data
Data TeamsTeacher Names Number and names
of students who are LIKELY:ALREADY CLOSE - 7
Number and names of students who are LIKELY:FAR TO GO – 6-5
Number and names of studentsFAR TO GO:INTENSIVE SUPPORT
Projected number at proficiency after instruction
Issac MMike TSam ECharles LBailey BBenjamin CRobert VJacob G
Ben CKaite HAnthony PLucas JD-Lanee DParker SClayton DRachel FTyler CMadison AJalen DPayton PEthan J
Caressa JCheyenne CTim BRebekah JNathan QJack FBen HHanna SJacob T
STRENGTHS1. Students understand the parts of a book (eg, Index).2. Students do well with single-task questions.3. Students remembered bibliography from last year's research unit.
GOALThe percentage of Team Elite students scoring at proficiency or higher in Skill 1 will increase from 31% to 95% by September 13, 2010 as measured by post test on September 13, 2010.
OBSTACLES1. Vocabulary - Students did not understand the word CITATION.2. Question #9 should cite a more current book for the bibliography, and second line of bibliography should be indented on test.3. Question #7 - The students were stumped by the word ENTRIES.4. Students were intimidated by multi-step questions.
STRATEGIES 1. Model and practice - demonstrating how to locate information using Index (references). 2. Cooperative Grouping - constructing an Index from words given to the student by the teacher.3. Think Alouds.4. Gradual Release of Responsibilities.
Data Teams
Attendance Data
08-09 09-10
Rate 0.9664 0.9593
73%
78%
83%
88%
93%
98%
Att
en
dan
ce R
ate
Currently 58 students are being served in Title I
5th Grade 29 students receiving Title I assistance in Language Arts
90% (26 students) with Tier 2 interventions have shown growth
10% (3 students) with Tier 2 interventions have not shown growth
6th Grade29 students receiving Title I assistance in Language Arts
86% (25 students) with Tier 2 interventions have shown growth
14% (4 students) with Tier 2 interventions have not shown growth
Title I Data
Additional School GoalsGOAL STATUS
By 2011, 100% of CBIS science teachers will be using ISTEM practices. COMPLETED
By 2012, 100% of CBIS faculty and administration, in conjuncture with FCSC, will use data-driven decision making to determine instructional decisions related to achievement as measured by data team records.
COMPLETED
By 2012, 100% of CBIS faculty will expand their knowledge and use of action-based research to determine effective instructional strategies. By the end of the 2010-11 school year, 100% of the
faculty will be involved with professional development in action-based research.
By the beginning of the 2011-12 school year, at least one teacher in each core subject will pilot an action-based research activity with their classes.
By the end of the 2012-13 school year, 100% of the faculty will be using action-based research in at least one area.
ON TARGET
2009–10 2010-11
Grizz Time – 30 Minutes Grizz Time – 45 Minutes
High Ability Clusters On Teams High Ability Teams
Health Taught In Focus Class Health Taught In Physical Ed Class
Focus Class Focus Class Eliminated
Math – 45 Minutes Math (EDM) – 90 Minutes
Band – 30 Minutes Band – 45 Minutes
Team Time – 30 Minutes Professional Development Wednesdays – 40 Minutes Prior To School Day
School-wide Program Adjustments
Rigorous Curriculum Specialized Student Groupings Data Driven Instruction/RTI NWEA Goal setting Safe and Disciplined Learning Environment Parent Involvement/Workshops Professional Development:
◦ Gradual Release Responsibility (GRR), Curry-Samara model, Data Teams, Power Writing, Indiana Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (ISTEM) notebooks, Everyday Math, ExamView, Curriculum Mapping, etc.
CBIS Success Strategies
NWEA Goal Setting Spirit Days Honor Roll Attendance Incentives On-level Team Quarterly Incentives Positive Support Programs:
◦ Anti-Bullying, Red Ribbon Week, Rachel’s Challenge, Leadership Breakfast, Lunch with the Principal, Cub Cards, Service Learning Projects, Grizz Kids, etc.
Celebrations and Positive Behavior Supports
Custer Baker Intermediate School
Moving from
Good to Great