SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
Transcript of SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
1/90
T LG
CF
L GD I
C A
D A T
A L G
A 1
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
2/90
A 2
:
C 2013 A (A)
A . ,, , ,
A.
B 9789710576432
8F A B, F. .
1605 C, C,
. 63 2 6346416; 6346567...
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
3/90
A 3
C
A ...................................................................................................................................... 5
................................................................................................................................................. 5
................................................................................................. 6
C A .................................................................................................................................... 6C A: CA ......................................................................................................... 8
C D : CD A ................................................................... 9
............................................................................................................................................ 11
? ..................................................................................................... 11
CA CD A: ? .................................................................... 12
CD/EA ............................................................................................................. 13
1: .......... ........... ......... 15
2: // ........... .......... ........... ......... 25
3: D .............................................................. 32
4: A ................................................................ 40
5: ............................................................ 50 6: D ..................................................................... 58
7: F CD A ........................................................................................... 66
8: CD A CD/EA ............................................................. 77
A 1: CD A F : ............................................................................. 80
A 2: D ................................................................................................. 86
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
4/90
A 4
A
CD C D
CD C D P
CD C
DIG D I L G
EA EL A
GA L G A
G L G U
G M L G O O
CAG S C A L G
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
5/90
A 5
A
T LGU
.
I LGU : S C
A L G (SCALOG) C D (CD)
A. T SCALOG
LGU . T CD
A LGU
.
C CD A CDP/ELA. T
CDP/ELA M. I
LGU .
T :
T LGU CDP/ELA T
MLGOO LGU CDP/ELA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
6/90
A 6
T
,
LGU. T ,
SCALOG CD A . T
F 1. T
.
C A
B ,
LGU. T :
T , C A :
1. I G . T
LGU
. A C D
, , ,
LGU .
2. I . T
/ LGU.
T CD , ,
,
CD , . A
,
, .
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
7/90
A
7
1.,
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
CL
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM
(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
C
E
Q
P
M
RR
C
DA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
/
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
CA
G
C
D
(CDA)
8.
IC
DA
CDP/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
8/90
A 8
C A: CAG
C
LGU . T :
o
o
o
o
o
T , C A :
3. D .C
LGU. B
, . P
CDP/ELA
.
I , C
, ..,
.
S 4. A . ,
LGU ,
.
T C
LGU
. I
C P T 1.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
9/90
A 9
1:
Capacity Pillar Definition
Structure Presence of appropriate structure (office, committee or work group) with definedauthority and accountability for performing the necessary functions within aprogram
Competency Knowledge and skills of people who need to perform their assigned functions inthe program, including technical competencies and program managementcompetencies
Management Systems Systems, processes and procedures or managing programs, i.e., planning andbudgeting; design and development; implementation; and monitoring andevaluation
Enabling Policies Presence of policy and legislative support or planning, developing,implementing, monitoring and evaluating service delivery functions, programs andprojects (e.g., appropriation ordinance, executive issuance)
Knowledge and Learning Mechanisms for generating, analyzing and using data and information as basisfor decision-making and continuous improvement
Leadership Presence of mechanisms for: Defining vision, mission and values, and setting strategic directions Ensuring transparency and accountability in the LGUs operations Instituting participatorymechanisms Establishing partnerships and collaboration Visible sponsorship of programs
T C C . T
LGU
. I LGU
,
.
C D : CD A
T LGU
CD A. T :
,
T , C D P
:
5. . A ,
. G
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
10/90
A 10
, LGU ELA T
. T
LGU .
T CE
. T :
, . A
. I
CD . T CD
LGU ELA T.
6. D . T
. T
,
. T
. T
/ .
7. D CD A. T
. T CD A
LGU . I
:
T O A/ ELA P P G
C S C
D S C (C D O)
C D I
E O
T CD
T
F R
P O/ O R
S S/ T A
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
11/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
12/90
A 12
F ,
A LGU
, ,
K LGU
K K ,
:
M ,
.
I ,
.
M .
CA CD A: ?
T
SCALOG CD A.
3:
Aspects Old SCALOG New SCALOG
Areas
considered
Follows the LGPMS Performance
Areas and Service Areas:o Social Governanceo Economic Governanceo Environmental Governanceo Administrative Governanceo Valuing Fundamentals of Good
Governance
Aligned with the DILG Outcome Areas:o Competitive and Business Friendly LGUso Environment Protective, Climate Change Adaptive and
Disaster Resilient LGUso Socially protective and Safe LGUso Accountable, transparent, participative and effective Local
Governance
Note that these areas still more or less correspond to the LGPMSperformance and service areas.
Dimensions ofCapacity beinganalyzed
Organizational Competenciesincluding:o Organization and Staffingo Legislative Support & Other
Enabling Mechanismso Transparencyo
Management Systemso Participationo Continuous Improvement/
Innovationo Customer Service
Capacity Pillars including:o Structureo Competencyo Management Systemso Enabling Policieso Knowledge and Learningo
Leadership
Note that there are similarities in dimensions being assessedbetween the old and new SCALOG. Aspects of Transparency,Participationand Customer Serviceare now integrated inManagement Systemsand Leadership.New dimensions have beenadded (Knowledge and Learning, and Leadership) based on currentliterature on high performing organizations.
Link toCDP/ELAprocess
Link to the CDP/ELA process isrecognized but not clearly specified
Links to related steps in the CDP/ELA process are specified tofacilitate integration of the capacity assessment and CapDevAgenda in the ELA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
13/90
A 13
Aspects Old SCALOG New SCALOG
Who areinvolved
Involves internal and externalstakeholders
Facilitated/coordinated by the LGPMSand/or SCALOG focal person/team
Involvement of CDP/ELA Team notclearly specified
Involves internal and external stakeholders
Recognizes the role of the CDP/ELA team in leading/ facilitating/coordinating the process
Assessment
Process
Involves rating of specific indicators per
performance/service area* Covers all areas, some of which may
not necessarily be a priority for the LGUin the next 3 years
Inadequate guide for in-depth analysis
The ratings are used as basis fordetermining capacity developmentinterventions
*Note that some of the indicators are nowoutdated because of new laws and otherissuances since SCALOG was launched in2004/2005.
No ratings required
Process allows for focusing on the capacities that are critical toachieving the performance goals set by the LGU for the next 3years
Involves more in-depth analysis of the current state of capacity,and identifying the desired capacity improvements to achieveperformance goals
The analysis is used as basis for determining capacitydevelopment interventions
4:
Aspects Old CapDev Agenda New CapDev Agenda
Informationcaptured
Columns in the template include:o Outcome Area/ Performance Objectives/ ELA
Priorityo Capacity Development Objectiveso Capacity Development Interventionso Expected Outputo Target of CapDevo Timeframeo Funding Requirementso Process Owner/ Office Responsibleo Source of Support/ Technical Assistance
Columns in the template include:o Outcome Area/ Performance Objectives/ ELA
Priorityo Current State of Capacityo Desired State of Capacity/ Capacity
Development Objectiveso Capacity Development Interventionso Expected Outputo Target of CapDevo Timeframeo Funding Requirementso Process Owner/ Office Responsibleo Source of Support/ Technical Assistance
Note that the templates are the same except for theaddition of a column on current state of capacity.
CD/EA
F 2 SCALOG/CD A
CDP/ELA . S CDP/ELA
.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
14/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
15/90
A 15
1
I
LGU
CD
1:
I ,
LGU LGU.
H LGU
.
M LGU .
U
. C
. L,
.
A LGU
,
LGU. T
LGU ELA T .
CD/EA
T S 2 (I P) S 3 (S
C) ELA . I
ELA M.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
16/90
A
16
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
CL
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM
(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
C
EQ
P
M
R
R
CDA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CA
G)
C
D
(CDA
)
8.
IC
DA
CDP/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
11.
1
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
17/90
A 17
C D?
A (CLD)
. T
. T CLD ,
, . I
LGU
.1B
, .
C D?
A LGU,
. E
. T CLD
,
. T CLD
.
C ?
C
LGU. I ,
/
.
C LGU :
I . B
,
. S . B , CLD
. I LGU
.
QA
Q
A
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
18/90
A 18
1 2. E C L D A
In India many organizations are involved in tackling the wide range of interconnected problems related topoverty, human trafficking, sex work and HIV/AIDS. Five NGOs one each located in Delhi and Kolkata(formerly Calcutta), and three in rural areas of northern India participated in a year-long action
research study funded by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). The study aimed toidentify the relevant agents and factors that contribute to these problems in each of the five researchareas, and the relationships among them. With such knowledge, the NGOs hoped to be able tounderstand where they should target their campaigns, and thus design more effective interventions.
The study began with a national level workshop where the NGO staff explored the driving forces behindthe increasing levels of poverty, migration and HIV/AIDS. They then created a preliminary version of acausal loop diagram to capture their understanding of the social context in which these processes takeplace.
After the workshop, fieldworkers from the NGOs visited the five action research areas, where they metwith community representatives, sex workers, traffickers and pimps (middlemen) and the police to hearabout the problem from their points of view. Based on this new information, they refined the original
causal loop diagram as shown in the diagram.
On the basis of this analysis, the Indian NGOsconcluded that in order to reduce migration fromrural areas, the only variable they would be ableto change was the range of livelihood options. Bypromoting new economic activities in the ruralareas (the top of the diagram), the NGOs hopedto help the farming communities by encouragingthem to adopt new income-generating activities,thus reducing the high levels of poverty andeventually breaking the link between poverty andmigration.
With a new range of targeted interventions, the NGOs achieved just that within one planting season. Intwo of the three rural areas, the new farming activities provided new opportunities for communities toimprove their livelihoods so that fewer members of poor families needed to migrate to the cities. In theresearch areas in both Delhi and Kolkata, their interventions also resulted in higher incomes andimprovements in the livelihoods of many poor families.
For the NGO workers, coming to understand the wide range of forces that serve to perpetuate a problemor situation, and realizing that they could influence only a few of them, was a humbling experience. Theyalso recognized that understanding the context at this broader level would contribute to much moremeaningful project monitoring and evaluation (M&E). Usually M&E is inward-looking, focusing onindividual projects without considering the broader picture.
On-line Source: adapted from http://www.capacity.org/capacity/opencms/en/topics/context_systems-
thinking/contextual-forces.html
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
19/90
C
T CLD
: M
P
I
C
A
B
QA
S 1I
S 2
I
3
S
S 4
L
S 5
C
C D?
.
.
. I
,
. T
CLD
.
C D
, CLD , , ,
.
.
"" ""
A 19
A CLD
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
20/90
A 20
F 13
.
1 3.
G C C D
1. S . C
,
. T, ,
. I
. E
.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
21/90
A 21
1 1. E C S I LGU
Business-Friendly andCompetitive LGUs
Environment-Protective,
Climate Change Adaptive,
and Disaster-Resilient LGUs
On Socially-Protective andSafe Communities
Processing time
Revenue Code
Roads Infrastructure
Pass-thru fees (illegalfees)
Forest Denudation
DRRM Plan or DRRMCFunctionality
Flooding
DRRM Fund
LPOC Functionality
Criminality
Water and Sanitation
Waterless Communities
2. D . E .
T .
. ,
. T,
, ;
, . T
S . F
,
. T ,
. S, ,
.
.
. T
O . A , ,
, O
. A
, . B
, ,
.
+
E
D
A
E
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
22/90
A 22
3. . A ,
. F , I
I I, I I
. T ( )
I .
4. . H ? T
. T
.
5. L . T
.
6. I
.
C A
A ,
. T
LGU
, . T
DILGL GP M S (LGPMS), C D P
LGU, , CBMS, , . B
,
.
T LGU , ,
, .
T :
D
S
N
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
23/90
A 23
F 14 LGU
.
1 4.
N MLGOO. S
. F :
EC
C
ESMP
LCES
G
MRFU
SL
G
S
I
BE
FDS
C
DN
H
S
ESMB
C/MENROC
R
S
L
SMB
SM
LCE
SM
5%
5070%
H
IEC
EC
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
24/90
A 24
1 2.
Instead of . More helpful to state as.
SW dumped in dumpsites 5 MT/day of solid waste dumped in dumpsite
Waste heaps in coastline Huge waste heaps in coastline (indicator from LGPMS)
Low functionality of SWMB SWMB not yet formed50-70% 50-70% of barangays with MRF
B , LGU
. T
LGU LGU .
1., ://../////
/.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
25/90
A 25
2 S A
CD
2: //
T (CD) ,
, ,
CD/ ,
. T , CD . S ,
CD . M
CD ,
.
A ,
/ LGU.
EA
T S 3 ELA .
A?
A ,
,
, . I
CD .
I ,
. F CD , :
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
26/90
A
26
21.
2.
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
CL
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM(C)
C
S
D
S
C
DI
CE
Q
PM
RR
CDA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CAG)
C
D
(CDA
)
8.
IC
DA
CDP
/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
27/90
A 27
,
,
LGU
CD CD .
A?
T S A :
T
CD .
T CD
, .
H
.
B ,
CD
. I
,
CD .
I CD
. T
.
A?
S . T
CD , CD
.
I ,
.
QA
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
28/90
A 28
I CD ,
,
. I
, ,
.
I ,
CD ,
, CD
.
F ,
CD .
A?
T .
, ,
LCD
I
S A F 22.
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
29/90
1 I S
T
. S
.
2 P
T 1
I
S
2 2.
LGU T,
. F C
.
S
. T :
I. T
. I
3 : H, M
1
2
3
A 29
. T
LGU
,
D ,
L.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
30/90
A 30
.
I . R
I ( ),
, , , , (
, , , , ), , .
K , ,
.
T
: (3), (2), (1). S
(0)
.
.
S . T ,
: (3), (2), (1).
C. T
CD . U
, (3), (2), (1).
T21 .
2 1.
Complex Social Issue: Solid Waste Management (SWM)
Group Interest in Issue Influence/ Resources MobilizationCapacity
Position inIssue
Action needed with thisstakeholder group
LCE (mayor &PBs)
High
Political mileagePolicy, human,financial, influence,moral, authority, clan
High Support Need strong buy-in
Church High
Social acceptance,moral, mileage
Policy, human,financial, influence,moral, authority
High Resist Need strong buy-in
NGAs Medium
Monitors extent ofcompliance toexisting laws/policies
Policy, human,financial, technology,expertise, moral,authority
Medium Support Active consultation
Business sector High
Profit / Investments/Jobs
Policy, human,financial, technology,expertise
Medium/low Support/resist Active consultation
Household High
WelfareClan Low Neutral Active consultation
Privateinstitutions,academe onSWM
High
Academic interestPolicy, human,technology, expertise
Medium Neutral Active consultation
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
31/90
I
3 I
T
S M.
1This part was adap
Your Projects, http:/
/ /
(F 23). T
. S T 2
ted from Thompson, Rachel, Stakeholder Analysis:
/www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newPPM_07.htm
2 3.
A 31
,
,
1.
Winning Support for
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
32/90
A 32
3
D
CD
3: D
E . I
. B
,
.
CD/EA
I CDP/ELA , S 5(F G
O). T
,
. T ELA M
,
.
C?
C . C
LGU ( )
,
LGU ,
.1
1D DILG C D F LGU, LGA, 2013.
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
33/90
A
33
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
CL
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM
(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
C
EQ
P
M
R
R
CDA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CA
G)
C
D
(CDA
)
8.
IC
DA
CDP/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
31.
3
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
34/90
C
(F 32).2
A
C
(
3 1. E
C
A
C
E
E
P K
A
E
2D DILG C D
3I.
C
LGU
3 2. L C P
LGU
,
(
) /
()
( ).3T 31
M
C
C E
I
I
I
I
D
LGU, LGA, 2013.
A 34
)
().
.
C
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
35/90
A 35
?
T ELA M :
.
.
, .
T :
, .
.
. .
. .
.
,
. .
.
F, :
()
.
.
, ,
.
A ,
. T
,
.
4H F E L A L G D: A M, PC L
G S P (LGSP), 2004.5I.
6I.
Q
A
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
36/90
A 36
I LGU
, LGPMS, NEDA,
L P I M S DILGNAPCNEDA . T
LGU . I
.
T LGU O A.7
3 2. A
A 8
C B F
G
S A S
S F SE, B I P
S T
E , C
C A D
G
F E M
F E M
C M E M
U E M
D P
G H S
S E
S H B F
P S
A, ,
G
L L
D P
R G
R A U
C S
H R M D
T
P
F A
7DILGLG S I C F, 2013.
8T LGPMS , , T (
LED) D P ( S G ).
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
37/90
A 37
?
T ELA M ,
, . T C L D S 1
. T C
LGU
. T
.
O
I :
L
LCD
C M
I , :
M ( , )
I
1. O P C M LGU .
2. G . F : (1)C LGU; (2) E P, C
C A D R LGU; (3) S
LGU; (4) A, ,
. T
, .
3. F P C M :. C .
S 1 ,
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
38/90
A 38
. B ,
, .., LGU . F
, S
M F 14 9,
:
3 3. E
. F . D
. O , . F
,
:
3 4. E /
. C C .T
P C M. A
.
S
60% 3
2MT/
H
%
C
E C
%
5MT/
(#)
H
L
E
C
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
39/90
A 39
3 3. E P C M
CHANGE MATRIX
PERFORMANCE
Current State Desired State
Solid Waste Management 5MT/ day solid waste dumped in dumpsite
___ (#) of household practicing wastesegregation
Huge waste heaps on the coastline
Low compliance to Environmental Code
Goals:
Solid waste dumped in dumpsite reduced by 60%in 3 years
Objectives:
Households practicing waste segregationincreased to _____ %
Waste heaps in the coastline reduced to none
Compliance to Environmental Code improved by____%
Agriculture
Average income of farmer households P5,500per month
Yield per hectare 3,300kg/hectare Minimal increase in number of farmers
participating in agri-extension program
Small % of farmers availing of credit facility
Goals:
Increase in average income of farmer households
to P8,000 per monthObjectives:
Increase in yield per hectare to 5,000kg/hectare
Increase in number of farmers participating in agri-extension program by ___%
Increase in farmers availing of credit by 50%
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
40/90
A 40
A C
CD
4: A
A ,
LGU . T
:
? ?
?
?
T C M .
I LGU C P .
T C M 3
,
. S LGU
1.
CD/EA
I CDP/ELA , S 6
(P P, P C D). T
ELA
M.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
41/90
A
41
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
CL
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM
(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
C
EQ
P
M
R
R
CDA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CA
G)
C
D
(CDA
)
8.
ICDA
CDP
/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
41.
3
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
42/90
A 42
C A?
C
LGU. I
.
?
T C .
T LGU
.T
, ,
(F 42).
T C P SCALOG
. A
SCALOG . T
. A ,
C
E
K&
A, ,
G
E , C C
A D G
C
B F G
G
QA
QA
4 2.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
43/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
44/90
A 44
Capacity Pillar Definition Pointers for Assessment
other LGUs; documenting and sharing goodpractices)?
Leadership Presence of mechanisms for:
Defining vision, mission and values,and setting strategic directions
Ensuring transparency and
accountability in the LGUs operations Instituting participatorymechanisms
Establishing partnerships andcollaboration
Visible sponsorship of programs
Are Leadership mechanisms in place and e fective:
Social Contract, CDP-ELA, Strategic Plan, etc.
SGH compliance, Ulat ng Bayan, etc.
Involvement of CSOs, citizen feedback mechanisms
Partnerships with NGAs, regional, sectoral groups,private sector, media, etc.
Active involvement in program, providing resources,etc.
C C ?
T C C M
. I
LGU
. I LGU
. I :
1. C
2. A
3. A /
QA
C
D
(/)
C
I
D
1.
?
3.A
?
2.A
?
4 3.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
45/90
A 45
C C ?
H
I :
L
LCD
C C M
I , :
M ( , )
A , :
T T 41 C D
A
T C S 3.
I
A , C C M ,
.., E B P, A P, S
M, F, H S D R, P O,
.
T C C M
, :
4. C C D
P C M S 3,
P C C M. S T 4
2, A. A
C C M .
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
46/90
A 46
5. D
.
I (
),
. F , ? /?
I (
),
. ?
?
I C C M,
. R
1 . S T
42, B1.
I
. I
.
F 44 C S
:
4 4. C
Current State
StructureCENRO and staff are all designates
Operational strategy half-baked Inadequate service delivery Programs not properly monitored
ESWMB organized but not functional No coordination among members of the Board
leading to poor implementation and overlapping
of PPAs Poor plans and programs Insufficient financial support
Knowledge and LearningNo accurate data on SWM
Difficulty in planning and formulation of programinterventions
Inefficient technologies used
/
?
/
?
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
47/90
A 47
6. D D .
? T
LGU
.
I D S C, :
/
?
?
?
?
S C S,
.
F 45 D S
:
4 5. D
Current State Desired State
Structure
CENRO and staff are all designates Operational strategy half-baked Inadequate service delivery Programs not properly monitored
ESWMB organized but not functional No coordination among members of the
Board leading to poor implementationand overlapping of PPAs
Poor plans and programs Insufficient financial support
CENRO appointed with office andpersonnel
Operational strategy are in place Service delivery very satisfactory M&E system established
Functional ESWMB with regularmeetings and proper coordination
Harmonized PPAs Responsive plans and programs 3-year SWM budget
Knowledge and LearningNo accurate data on SWM
Difficulty in planning and formulation ofprogram interventions
Inefficient technologies used
Databank is in place and used in planningand decision-making
?
/
?
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
48/90
A 48
7. I C D I.
? CD
.
S T 46 B3.
4 2:
CHANGE MATRIX
PERFORMANCE
Current State Desired State
Solid Waste Management
5MT/ day solid waste dumped in dumpsite
___ (#) of household practicing wastesegregation
Huge waste heaps on the coastline
Low compliance to Environmental Code
Goals:
Solid waste dumped in dumpsite reduced by 60%in 3 years
Objectives:
Households practicing waste segregation
increased to _____ % Waste heaps in the coastline reduced to none
Compliance to Environmental Code improved by____%
CAPACITY
Current State Desired State Intervention
StructureMENRO and staff are alldesignates
Operational strategy half-baked
Inadequate service delivery
SWMB organized but notfunctional
Poor plans and programs Insufficient financial support
MENRO appointed with office andpersonnel
Operational strategy are inplace
Service delivery verysatisfactory
Functional SWMB with regularmeetings and proper coordination
Appointment of MENRO and staff
Provision of budget
Strategic planning
Team and commitmentbuilding
Regular meetings
Formulate SWM plan
Creation of TWG with focus onM&E of SWM Plan
Reactivation and reorientation ofthe ESWMB
Conduct of monthly meetingsIssuance of designation
CompetenciesLack of technical know-how ofMENRO garbage collectors
Inefficient garbage collection Increased volume of wastedumped
Highly trained and competentgarbage collectors
Conduct of re-orientation forMENRO garbage collectors on
proper collection and disposal ofwastes
Management SystemsAbsence of monitoringmechanisms
Weak enforcement of Envi.Code
No basis for correctivemeasures
Monitoring mechanisminstitutionalized
Strict enforcement of laws
Effective garbage collection
Develop a monitoring mechanism
Regular submission of M&Ereports
Review and improve existing
B1B2
B3
A
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
49/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
50/90
A 50
P C
D S
CD
5:
T
LGU,
ELA.
A ,
LGU. S ;
. S ;
. G ,
LGU ELA/CD T
. T
LGU
. T
LGU C D P EL A.
CD ?
P CD
. F LGU
,
. D
, CD , LGU
LGU.
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
51/90
A
51
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
CL
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM
(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
CE
Q
PM
R
R
C
DA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CA
G)
C
D
(CDA)
8.
IC
DA
CDP/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
51.
5
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
52/90
A 52
CD ?
T . S
ELA G. F , : CE Q P
M.
CE
T
. T :
,
.
. T :
CD .
T , .
CD
.
CD
.
. T
:
T CD .
I .
I
.
T . T ,
/ .
M
M
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
53/90
A 53
P
E
LCD
L
I CE
1. F C M, CD .
2. U P M,
. T T,
. P
. U , , .
3. C :
3:
L
H H L
(1)
H
M
(2)
H
H
(3)
M M L
(4)
M
M
(5)
M
H
(6)
L L L
(7)
L
M
(8)
L
H
(9)
L M H
L
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
54/90
A 54
H C, E (C #1). T
,
. C
LGU.
H C, H E (C #3). T
. G LGU
,
. T, ,
.
C, E (C 7). T
,
.
C, H E (C 9). T
.
I , C 1,2,3
; ,
!
I C 4,5,6
;
, ;
I C 7,8, 9
CD .
T
CD . T
CD
LGU ELA T.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
55/90
A 55
B 9
A :
I , ,
I , ,
I
I
,
I LGU .
I C 10
1. E C. T
. C
LGU T
. T, LGU
. F , 35 .
C :
. R
CE Q .
. R CE
Q . I , LGU LCE T
.
. T
, ,
.
9A C G,P P: A S A T O
M M, O O Q I, U O M, USA,
://..///
/PPG1.10
I
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
56/90
A 56
. T /
.
A /
.
2. E . A
. A ,
15, 1 5 , .
3. E .P
. N ,
. E :
I C D O: = 5
T: = 4
A: = 3
4. C . T
. P
( F 53).
5. . T
, . T
. A ,
.
6. D .A
,
. T
. B
, . U ,
, .
T . I
LGU, D .
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
57/90
A 57
7. D . O ,
. A ( )
/ .
5 2.
H
1. E .
2. G RATING .
3. MULTIPL: .
4. RITE , .., ,
.5. M , REPEAT ALL STEPS
6. F : ADD ALL ALUES , GREEN BO
C/I
R
S
(.. 15, 1
, 5
)
A
SMB
C
MENRO
IEC
SM
P
SM
P
C
D O
( R S
60%
5MT/
2MT/)
5 55 = 25 45=20 55=25 55=25
A
R
R
4 44=16 24=8 34=12 24=8
L
3 33=9 23=6 33=9 33=9
T P
S
60
M
50 34 46 42
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
58/90
A 58
D R M S CD
6: D
A , ,
. A
, ,
.
. T ,
.. .
. A .
,
, . O
, ,
.
. U,
.
.
A
. R ,
,
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
59/90
A 59
. I
.
A .
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
60/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
61/90
A 61
?
A
. T ,
,
. A
.
E
A :
R
R , .. H, M
L
R
R ,
?
T R R :
R .
I .
I , .
R , .
T
/ .
QA
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
62/90
A 62
?11
T ,
R R, :
A , ,
;
A
,
/ / /
;
A
;
A
;
F , , ,
.
?
R A M
. H, ,
R R,
.
H,
. T,
. T
, :
11P R A M, T A P M, 85 O R, H
, B HP11 2D,
://...//PGI914/R3/PRAMAPM.
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
63/90
A 63
1. . A , ,
.
2. . T
.
A?
T ,
. S
R R :
I, (.., LGU
)
P (.. ) P (..,
LGU)
P (.., )
?
T 3 , .
M
P
L
LCD
I
1. I . T
.
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
64/90
A 64
6 2.
I
C
U LGU T
R LGU
2. D , . O
, ,
/
.
3. I / .U
1 2,
, . T
, ..
,
.
6 3.
.
4. I . I
.
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
65/90
A 65
. A
, ,
.
A F 61 .
6 1.
Risk DefinitionIntensity
(Low/Medium/High)Mitigation Needed Risk Owner
Strong resistance from communityhosting the proposed controlleddumpsite project
High Hold consultation meetingswith community groups toinform them of the projectsprecautionary measures
EnvironmentalManagement Office(EMO) of the LGU
Low absorptive capacity of LGUstaff on SWM
High Provide training andmentoring on SWM
Head of EMO
Low participation of localcommunity in SWM programs
Medium Conduct massive IEC onSWM program
EMO
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
66/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
67/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
68/90
A
68
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
C
L
SM
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
CE
Q
PM
RR
CDA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CA
G)
C
D
(CDA
)
8.
IC
DA
CDP/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
69/90
A 69
G C D A
T LGA CD A . O /
T LGU : (1)
LGU; (2) ,
LGU; (3) LGU; (4) , ,
.
T LGA CD A 11 :
7. 1:
A G()
C
D
C
D
I
E
O
T
CD
T
F
F R P
/
O
S
/
T
A
1
2
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
B CD A.
1. C ; / ; (1)
; (2) ; (3) ; (4) ; (5)
, , (6) .
2. D
.
3. C
LGU .
4. E , , , ;
5. T CD ;6. T
;
7. F 1 /
CD 1;
8. F 2 /
CD 2;
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
70/90
A 70
9. F 3 /
CD 3;
10.P /O R
;
11.S / //
,
.
CD A
T CD A :
C .
T CD A
L C E LGU
/ . A
, , .
A
G. T M
LGU. O
CD . T CD A
.
/
CD . T CD
( CD ), ,
. T
LGU .
G
.P
CD . T
.
QA
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
71/90
A 71
C D A?
8
I :
L
LCD
C D A M
I :
I
G L G O A.
T (1) C B F LGU; (2) E
P, C C A D R LGU; (3) S
P S LGU; (4) A, ,
.
O C D A L G
O A;
F O , .
T P C M S 3. A :
A:
E P, C C A D R LGU
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
72/90
A 72
A C :
Volume of solid waste dumped at dumpsite is5MT/day
___ (#) of household practicing waste segregation
Huge waste heaps on the coastline
Low compliance to Environmental Code
A G:
Goals:
Solid waste dumped in dumpsite reduced by 60% in3 years
Objectives:
Households practicing waste segregation increasedto _____ %
Waste heaps in the coastline reduced to none Compliance to Environmental Code improved by
____%
F C D A M
:
1. C . T C C
M S 4;
2. C . T C
C M S 4.
3. C . T
C C M S 4.
4. I . T
, CD .
5. I , , ,
CD .
6. I CD .
S
.
7. I 1. R S5
P CD . C 1 CD .
I , CD 13
1. I 1
CD .
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
73/90
A 73
7. 2: 1
Priority CD InterventionsTimeframe of the
CD InterventionPhase/Year
1. A SM B 3 1
, 1
2. C MENRO 6 1
, 1
3. IEC 6 2
, 1
4. SM P P 6 3
, 1
D CD
. B
.
7. 3: /
CD :
A
B
A
C:
P10,000/
8
P30,000.00
C
SM P
C:
P10,000/
8
T
T
P1000/
10
P20,000.00
P10,000.00
I I
SM
IEC M
P100/
1000
P100,000.00
C
SM
B
SM
P160,000.00
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
74/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
75/90
A 75
R R C, L G A, B
L G D.
B CD A .
7. 4 : ,
A:
E P, C C A D R LGU
A C :
Volume of solid waste dumped at dumpsite is 5MT/day
___ (#) of household practicing waste segregation
Huge waste heaps on the coastline
Low compliance to Environmental Code
A G:
Goals:
Solid waste dumped in dumpsite reduced by 60% in 3 yearsObjectives:
Households practicing waste segregation increased to _____ %
Waste heaps in the coastline reduced to none
Compliance to Environmental Code improved by ____%
Current stateof capacity
Desired stateof capacity
CapacityDevelopment
Interventions
ExpectedOutput
Targetof
CapDev
TimeFrame
Funding Requirements Processowner/ Office
responsible
Source ofsupport/
Technical
Assistance
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Structure
ESWMBorganized butnot functional
Functional
ESWMB with
regular
meetings and
proper
coordination
Activation of
SWM Board
Memo of
Under-
standing
defining
roles of
the SWM
Board
Member
s of the
SWMB
3 mos P30K Environ-
ment Officer
or Designate
or the MPDC
DILG-
MLGOO,
LGRRC,
or DENR-
EMB
Regional
Office
MENRO and
staff are alldesignates Operational
strategyhalf-baked
Inadequateservicedelivery
MENRO
appointedwith officeandpersonnel Operational
strategy arein place
Servicedelivery verysatisfactory
Appointment of
MENRO and
staff
Provision ofbudget
Strategicplanning
Team andcommitmentbuilding
Regularmeetings
FormulateSWM plan
MENRO
created
MENRO 1 year 100K Office of the
Mayor, SB
DILG,
MLGOO
(TA)
Enablingpolicies
Absence ofenvironmental
ordinance andSWM Plan No blueprint
for programimplementation
No basis forcollection
No M&E
Environmentalordinance and
SWM Planformulated,passed andenacted
Coaching on
SWM
formulation
SWM Plan MPDC,
MENRO
, SWMB
6 mos P30k Environ-
ment
Officer/Desig
nate, or the
MPDC
DILG-
MLGOO,
LGRRC,
or DENR-
EMB
Regional
Office,
NSWMC
Increased levelof awareness
IEC completed IEC toincrease
MPDC 6 mos P100
K
Public
Informa-tion
DILG-
MLGOO,
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
76/90
A 76
Current state
of capacity
Desired state
of capacity
Capacity
Development
Interventions
Expected
Output
Target
of
CapDev
Time
Frame
Funding Requirements Process
owner/ Office
responsible
Source of
support/
Technical
Assistance
Yr
1
Yr
2
Yr
3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
of thecommunity
level ofawareness of the
community on SWM
Office DENR-
EMB
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
77/90
A 77
I CD
A CDP/ELA
CD
8: CD A CD/EA
CD A , CDP/ELA. T
CDP/ELA . I ,
CD A CDP/ELA,
ELA ELA .
C A CDA CD/EA ?
T , S 3, 4 8
CDP/ELA. F 82
CDP/ELA. T
CD
A, B, C D.
CD A, ?
S CD A CDP/ELA,
CDP/ELA :
C
. I
.
S
ELA
. T
CD A .
QA
QA
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
78/90
A
78
81.
8
1.I
LGU
3.
D
4.
A
A
D
I
I
5.
P
7.
D
CDA
6.D
C
L
S
M
CM(P)
C
P
D
P
CM
(C)
C
S
D
S
C
D
I
C
EQ
P
M
R
R
CDA
LGU
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
G,
3
?
?H?
CDA
3?
K
CA
C
A
(CA
G)
C
D
(CDA
)
8.
IC
DA
CDP/ELA
2.I
HCDA
CDP/ELA?
H
CD
A?
I
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
79/90
A 79
8 2. /
M L C E
S R A CDP/ELA
I. LGU M SII. B P LGU
P
D
E
III. D G S ( )
B D S S
S G, O S
S P P P
I. P H R/ C D N I
. P L R
I. R M S
P F R ELA P R S R M R G
II. P I, M E
A G, T C
S 3 CDP/ELA
B H / C D
I T C C
S 4 CD A
S 7 CDP/ELA.
C T
C C ,
E (
)
CDP/ELA.
D F EA
T CD A,
F
CDP/ELA.
A
B
D
C
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
80/90
A80
A1:CD
AF:
2:
Group
InterestinIssue
Influe
nce/Resources
Mobilization
Capacity
Positionin
Issue
Actionneededwiththis
stakeh
oldergroup
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
81/90
A81
3:
CHANGEMATRIX
PERFORMANCEArea:
CurrentState
DesiredState
Sub-sector:
Sub-sector:
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
82/90
A82
4:
CHANGEMATRIX
PERFORMANCEArea
CurrentState
DesiredState
Subsectorarea
CAPACITY
Current
State
DesiredState
Intervention
Structure
Competencies
ManagementSystems
EnablingPolicies
KnowledgeandLearning
Leadership
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
83/90
A83
5:
CHANGEMATRIX
PERFORMANCEArea
CurrentState
DesiredState
Subsectorarea
Capacity
Levelof
contribution
Levelofeffort
Q
uickwins/Major
project?Fill-ins?
Thanklesstasks
CurrentState
DesiredState
Intervention
H
M
L
H
M
L
Structure
Competencie
ManagementSystems
EnablingPolicies
KnowledgeandLearning
Leadership
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
84/90
A84
6:
CHANGEMATRIX
PERFORMANCEArea
CurrentState
DesiredState
Subsectorarea:
CAPACIT
Y
Levelof
contribution
Levelof
effort
Quickwins/
Majorproject?
Fill-ins?
Thanklesstasks
Risk
definition
Intersity
Mitigatio
n
needed
Riskowner
CurrentState
Desired
State
Intervention
H
M
L
H
M
L
Structure
Competencie
Management
Systems
Enabling
Policies
Knowledge
andLearning
Leadership
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
85/90
A85
7:
CHANGEMATRIX
PERFORMANCEArea
CurrentState
DesiredState
Subsectorarea:
CurrentState
Ofcapacity
DesiredState
ofcapacity
Intervention
Expected
output
Peoplewho
wil
lbe
involvedin
the
interventions
Timeframe
Funding
requirements
Year1
Funding
requirements
Year2
Funding
requirements
Year3
Proce
ss
owner
Support
neededfrom
whom
Structure
Competencies
Management
Systems
Enabling
Policies
Knowledge
andLearning
Leadership
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
86/90
A86
A2:
D
TypesofinterventionsandorganizationlevelsODandChange,CummingsandWorley,2009
Interventions
Indi'l
Group
Org
Description
1.
HumanProcessInterventions
Theseprocessesincludecommunication,problemsolving,groupdecisionmakin
gandleadership;
DeeplyrootedinthehistoryofOD;
Derivedmainlyfromthedisciplinesofpsychologyandsocialpsychologyandapp
liedfieldsofgroup
dynamicsandhumanrelations;
Practitionersapplyingtheseinterventionsgenerallyvaluehumanfulfilmentande
xpectthat
organizationaleffectivenessspringsfromimprovedfunctioningofpeopleandorg
anizational
processes.
A.
Inter-personalrelationship
sand
groupdynamics
1.1.
Processconsultation
X
Focusesoninterpersonalrelationsandsocialdynamicsoccurringinworkgroups;
Helpsgroupmembersdiagnosegroup
functioninganddeviseappropriatesolutio
nstoprocess
problemse.g.
dysfunctionalconflict,poorcommunication,
ineffectivenorms;
Aimistohelpmembersgaintheskills
andunderstandingnecessaryoidentifyan
dsolveproblems
themselves.
1.2.
Thirdpartyintervention
X
X
Formofprocessconsultationaimedatdysfunctionalinterpersonalrelationsinorganizations;
Thethirdpartyintervenerhelpspeople
resolveconflictsthruproblemsolving,bargainingand
conciliation.
1.3.
Teambuilding
X
Thisinterventionhelpsworkgroupsbe
comemoreeffectiveinaccomplishingtasks.
Helpsmembersdiagnosegroupproce
ssesanddevisesolutionstoproblems.
Goesbeyondgroupprocessesbecausetheinterventionincludesexaminationofgroupstask,
memberrolesandstrategiesforperformingtasks;
ConsultantmayfunctionasRPofferingexpertiserelatedtothegrouptasks.
B.
System-widehumanprocess
interventions
1.4.
Organizationconfrontation
meeting
X
X
Thischangemethodmobilizesorganiz
ationmemberstoidentifyproblems,setactiontargetsand
workonproblems;
Appliedwhenorganizationsareexperiencingstressandwhenmanagementnee
dstoorganize
resourcesforimmediateproblemsolving;
Interventionincludesvariousgroupingsofemployeesacrosstheorganizationin
identifyingand
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
87/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
88/90
A88
Interventions
Indi'l
Group
Org
Description
Providememberswithalternativesettingsinwhichtoaddressproblemsandproposeinnovative
solutionsfromexistingstructuresandculture;
Twocommonparallelstructuresareth
ecooperativeunionmanagementprojects
andquality
circles.
2.5.
Totalqualitymanagement
X
X
Morecomprehensivethanparallelstru
ctures;
Alsoknownascomprehensiveprocessimprovement,leanandsixsigma;
Representsalongtermefforttoorient
allofanorganizationsactivitiesaroundth
econceptof
quality;
InterventionssubsumedunderTQMaretheMalcolmBaldridgeAward,
PhilippineQualityAward
Systemwhereorganizationsareawardedforachievementalong7dimensionse
.g.:
Leadership,
strategicplanning,customerandmark
etfocus,measurement,analysisandknow
ledge
management,humanresourcefocus,processmanagementandbusinessresults.
2.6.
Highinvolvement
organization
X
X
X
D
esignedwithfeaturescongruentwitheachothersuchas:
Flat,leanorganizationstructures
Jobdesignsthatprovideemployeesw
ithhighlevelsofdiscretion,
taskvarietyan
dmeaningful
feedback
Openinformationsystemsthataretiedtojobsorworkteamswhichprovideinfo
rmationfor
employeestoparticipatemeaningfully
indecisionmaking;
Careersystemsthatprovidedifferenttracksforadvancementandcounsellingto
helppeople
chooseappropriatepaths
SelectionofemployeesforHIOthroug
harealisticisimprovedthrougharealistic
jobpreview
providinginformationaboutwhatitwillbeliketoworkinsuchsituations,
Trainingemployeesforthenecessary
knowledgeandskillstoparticipateeffectiv
elyindecision
making
Rewardsystems-rewardsarebasedo
nacquiringnewskillsaswellassharingg
ainsfrom
improvedperformance
Policiesarereasonableandgivethee
mployeestheimpressionthatthefirmiscommittedtotheir
longtermdevelopment;
Physicallayouts-supportteamstructu
resthatreducestatusdifferencesamongemployees
reinforcesegalitarianclimate;
3.
Humanresourcesmanagement
Focusesoninterventionsusedtodeve
lop,
integrateandsupportpeopleinorgan
izations;
Theseincludecareerplanning,reward
systems,goalsetting,performanceappra
isal.
3.1.
Goalsetting
X
X
Involvessettingclearandchallenging
goals;
3.2.
Performanceappraisal/PMS
X
X
Isasystematicprocessofjointlyassessingworkrelatedachievements,strengthsandweaknesses;
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
89/90
-
8/13/2019 SCALOG-CapDev Agenda ToolkitL
90/90