Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual...

31
Scaling Perceived Exertion

Transcript of Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual...

Page 1: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Scaling Perceived Exertion

Page 2: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Psychophysiolgoy

• Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses

• Relationship between body & mind

Page 3: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Exertional Mediators:Physiological

• Respiratory / metabolic– Ventilatory

• Peripheral– Acidosis

• Non specific– Hormones

Page 4: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Exertional Mediators:Psychological

• Emotion & mood

• Cognitive function

• Perceptual processes

• Social or situational

Page 5: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Modern Approaches

• Direct assessment– Study sensory response

• Scale sensations

• Magnitude estimates of perceived exertion– Interindividual comparisons not possible

• Catergory scaling – Interindividual comparisons

Page 6: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Borg (1961) 21-pt– 0– 1– 2– 3 Extremely light– 4– 5 Very light– 6– 7 Light– 8– 9 Rather light– 10– 11 Neither light or laborious– 12– 13 Rather laborious– 14– 15 Laborious– 16– 17 Very laborious– 18– 19 Extremely laborious– 20

Page 7: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

21 – pt Studies

• Borg 1961: n = 12 • Cycling at 100, 300, 900, 1200kpm/min• RPE not linear with HR or Power

• Borg, Dahlstrom 1962: n = 28 (14 & 15)• Linear relationship with HR, PO

• Borg, Linderholm 1967: n = 61 males (18 to 79)

• HR declined with age at all Powers, • RPE equal or increased with age

Page 8: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Borg (1971) – 15 pt

– 6 – 7 Very, very light– 8– 9 Very light– 10– 11 Fairly light– 12– 13 Somewhat hard– 14– 15 Hard – 16– 17 Very hard– 18– 19 Very, very hard – 20

Page 9: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Borg (1985) – 15 pt

– 6 No exertion at all – 7 Extremely light– 8– 9 Very light– 10– 11 Light– 12– 13 Somewhat hard– 14– 15 Hard (heavy)– 16– 17 Very hard– 18– 19 Very, very hard – 20 Maximal exertion

Page 10: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

15 – pt Studies

• Borg (1971): Linear relationship between HR, Power and RPE

• Noble et al. (1986): RPE is dependent on mode of exercise

Page 11: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Borg (1983) 10 - pt0 Nothing at all0.30.5 Extremely weak (just noticeable)1 Very weak1.52 Weak (light)2.53 Moderate4 5 Strong (heavy)67 Very strong8910 Extremely strong11 • Maximal

Page 12: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

10 – pt Studies

Noble et al. 1983

• Blood lactate and RPE increase similarly with quadratic trend

• Muscle lactate increased with a cubic trend

• HR increased linearly

Page 13: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Omni Scale

1. Artist drew pictures: represent physical exertional state.

2. Stimulus given to subjects verbal description of made

3. 6 verbal cues collected for adults (easy and hard) and 6 for children (tired).

4. Pictures & cues placed at equal intervals in 0 to 10.

Page 14: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Omni Adult Walking

Page 15: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Omni Adult Cycling

Page 16: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Uses of RPE

Page 17: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Perceptually Regulated Exercise Prescription

• To define the cardio respiratory training zone

• Regulate training intensity

• Estimation – production paradigm

• Production only paradigm

Page 18: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Perceptual Estimation-Production Prescription

• RPE linked to clinical events during GXT

• Two stage process:

• ID target RPE estimated during a GXT

• RPE is then produced during exercise

Page 19: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

RPE Estimation

• RPE taken at GXT stages

• Max VO2 identified

• E.g 70 & 85% max identified

• Training RPE identified

Page 20: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

RPE Production

• Client titrates exercise intensity

• Related to high/low intensities on GXT

• Overload is ‘natural’

Page 21: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Perceptual Production-Only Prescription

• Recommended for normal subjects only

• Identify ‘known’ intenstiy for benefit– CV training– Weight loss

• Good evidence base for AnT – 12 – 14– 50 – 80%max

Page 22: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Examples of Other Scales

Clinical Subscales

Page 23: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

The Angina Scale

1+ Light, barely noticeable

2+ Moderate, bothersome

3+ Severe, very uncomfortable

4+ Most severe pain ever experienced in the past

Page 24: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Gagge, Stolwijk, Hardy ACSM (1986)

Comfortable sensation (1967)

1 Comfortable

2 Slightly uncomfortable

3 Uncomfortable

4 Very uncomfortable

Page 25: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Clinical Guidelines & applications

Page 26: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Classification of PA intensityPollock et al. 1990 / ACSM 1995

Relative Intensity

Intensity   %VO2max   %HRmax   RPE

Very light <30 <35 <10

Light 30-49 35-59 10 to 11

Moderate 50-74 60-79 12 to 13

Heavy 75-84 80-89 14 to 16

Very heavy >85 >90 >16

Page 27: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

RPE for RehabilitationBorg 1998

• Exercise should be started at 9 to 11

• After a while progress to 13

• When exercise is hard :15

it is too hard!!!

Page 28: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

RPE for Cardiac patientsPhase IV (BACR 2006)

• Use of RPE during GXT

• Use of RPE during the exercise sessions

• Use of RPE at home-based activity in a recorded log:frequency, duration, intensity, self monitoring of pulse rate

• Warm-up at RPE 10 to 11 (that is “light”)

• Main exercise program at RPE 12 to 15 (that is “somewhat hard” to “hard”)

• In neuropathy use of RPE is recommended

Page 29: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

RPE for Cardiac patientsPhase IV (BACR 2006)

It is important not to rely on any single indicator of exertion levels, such as RPE or pulse rate.

Participants signs and symptoms responding appropriately to the activity:

• Excessive breathlessness• Loss of quality of movement• Skin colour sweat rate

Page 30: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Clinical applications of RPE (ACSM 1997)

Disease 6-20 scale OMNI scale

Myocardial infarction 11 to 16 4 to 7

CABG or PTCA 12 to 14 5 to 6

Valvular heart disease 11 to 14 4 to 7

Congestive heart failure 11 to 16 4 to 7

Cardiac transplant 11 to 16 4 to 7

Hypertension 11 to 13 4 to 5

Pulmonary disease 11 to 13 4 to 5

Page 31: Scaling Perceived Exertion. Psychophysiolgoy Relationship between physical stimuli & perceptual responses Relationship between body & mind.

Task

• What is the problem with exercise intensity and b-blockade?