SBM Validation Form

download SBM Validation Form

of 4

description

sbm tool

Transcript of SBM Validation Form

  • SBM VALIDATION FORM

    Name of School: Cabcaben Elementary School

    Step 1: Determine Performance Improvement (60%)

    Thematic Area Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points

    Access (45%) EnrollmentSY 2010 - 2011 1 -SY 2010 - 2012 2 -SY 2010 - 2013 3 -Ave. % of Increase:

    Efficiency (25%) Drop Out Rate (DR) Baseline:SY 2010 - 2011 1 -SY 2010 - 2012 2 -SY 2010 - 2013 3 -Ave. % of Decrease: decrease

    Cohort Survival Rate (CSR) Baseline:SY 2010 - 2011 1 -SY 2010 - 2012 2 -SY 2010 - 2013 3 -Ave. % of Increase:

    Completion Rate (CR) Baseline:SY 2010 - 2011 1 -SY 2010 - 2012 2 -SY 2010 - 2013 3 -Ave. % of Increase:Sub-total (DR+CR+CSR)

    Quality (30%) Achievement Rate (NAT)SY 2010 - 2011 1 - MarginalSY 2010 - 2012 2 - AverageSY 2010 - 2013 3 - HighAve. % of Increase:

    InterpretationGoodBetterBest

    Legend:Numerical Rating Scale Description

    0.50 - 1.49 Good1.50 - 2.49 Better2.5 - 3.00 Best

    Note: Only schools having a Performance Improvement of "Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation

    Step 2: Compute for validated SBM Assessment Scores (40%)

    Marginal: at least 1% increaseAverage: at least 7% increaseHigh: at least 10% increase

    Marginal: at least 25% decreaseAverage: at least 50% decreaseHigh: Has 0 DR or more than 4%

    Marginal: at least 5% increaseAverage: at least 7% increaseHigh: at least 10% increase

    Marginal: at least 5% increaseAverage: at least 7% increaseHigh: at least 10% increase

  • SBM Principles Weight

    Leadership 30%Curriculum & Learning 30%Accountability 25%Resource Management 15%Subtotal 100%

  • SBM VALIDATION FORM

    Division: Bataan

    Rating & Equivalent Points Computation Results

    x 0.45 =

    x 0.25 =

    X 0.25 =

    Sub-total

    DescriptionGoodBetterBest

    Note: Only schools having a Performance Improvement of "Better" can apply to the Division for SBM Validation

    Marginal: at least 1% increaseAverage: at least 7% increaseHigh: at least 10% increase

    Marginal: at least 25% decreaseAverage: at least 50% decreaseHigh: Has 0 DR or more than 4%

    Marginal: at least 5% increaseAverage: at least 7% increaseHigh: at least 10% increase

    Marginal: at least 5% increaseAverage: at least 7% increaseHigh: at least 10% increase

    : 26 - 50%: 51 - 75%: 76 - 100 %

  • Results

    Computationx 0.3x 0.3x 0.25x 0.15

    Cumulative Scores of Validators per Principle

    Sheet1