Saying No! to Hampshire County Council Public Meeting : Verwood Memorial Hall Monday 20 th June 2011...
-
Upload
mitchell-welch -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Saying No! to Hampshire County Council Public Meeting : Verwood Memorial Hall Monday 20 th June 2011...
Saying “No!” to Hampshire County Council
Public Meeting : Verwood Memorial HallMonday 20th June 2011
This slide pack will be made available on the campaign website
www.no2purplehaze.co.uk
Agenda07:00 – 07:10 : Welcome, Introductions & Objectives - Britt
07:10 – 08:00 The Proposals : Sarah SumnerHCC’s Proposals : Outline Moors Valley impact Q&A session - All
08:00 – 08:45 The IssuesThe Key Issues : Outline – Sarah SumnerThe Councillor’s Perspective – Guest Speaker : Spencer FlowerQ&A session – All
08:45 – 09:00 : Break – record issues & unasked questions (name/contact no.), comfort break
09:00 – 09:25 What’s Next? Britt PoyntzHCC’s Consultation Process, Timetable & what to do Resources to be availableCampaign Next StepsQuestions - All
09:25– 09:30 : Meeting close - Britt
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 2
Welcome & introductions
Who’s in the room?Press/mediaCouncillorsetc . . .
The meeting will be video recorded
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 3
Welcome & introductions
A few words from Bob Walters, our MP – Cllr Spencer Flower
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 4
Domestics & ground rules• Health & Safety items :
– fire exits, evacuation & assembly point, hazards in the room, personal comfort, etc . . .
• Ground Rules Mobiles on silent running One person speaking at a time & introduce yourself Respect the opinions of others “Timeout” - no speeches from the floor, no hogging the meeting Keep focussed - we won’t solve all of the world’s problems tonight
• Other resources– Clipboard, maps, “Issues” board, post-its, microphone, etc.
• Bucket collection
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 5
Meeting objectives
After this meeting you should have an increased knowledge of:1.Hampshire County Council’s proposals and their potential impact on our town, its residents & the surrounding countryside2.What will happen next in the HCC consultation process
3. . . . and how you will be able to contributePublic Meeting 20/6/2011 6
About HCC’s consultation process...
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 7
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
We are at this stage
Sarah Sumner : Hon Sec Association of Verwood Residents
“no2purplehaze” Campaign Operations & Press Liaison Lead
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 8
About HCC’s proposals . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 9
Campaign research resources Campaign research resources utilised as at 17th June 2011 A Archaeology & Contemporary Society C Cambridge Econometrics Council of Europe: Culture, Heritage & Nature D DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs) Dorset County Council GIS (Geographical Information Systems) E English Heritage English Nature Environment Agency Environmental Health Perspectives Environmental Protection UK ETAG European Commission: Environment Exponent (Engineering & Scientific Consultancy)
F Forestry Commission G Google Greenpeace Environmental Trust Guardian Newspaper GWP Consultants: Quarry Design H Hampshire Fire Authority: Community Risk Intelligence Health & Safety Executive I Info4local.com L Landscape Supplies Direct N National Geographic: Environment Natural England Natural Environment Research Council (British Geological Survey) NFDC
P Paving Expert R Raymond Brown RPA Safety Services T Tarmac Toxicological Sciences U UCL: Dept of Earth Sciences V Veolia: Environmental Services Verwood Local Action Group minutes W Waste Management World Wikipedia Workers Health Centre WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme)
Hampshire CC proposes these sites
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 10
Land Wanted
Moors Valley (Purple Haze)70 Hectares =173 Acres =157 Football Pitches
Blue Haze 7.7 Hectares =19 Acres =17 Football Pitches
Hampshire CC ‘s land grab . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 11
Purple HazeExtract 8,000,000 Tons of sand & gravel in total250,000 Tons each yearThenFill the hole with non-hazardous waste
HCC estimate = 100 lorries in & 100 lorries out every day
Hampshire CC proposes to get . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 12
Blue Haze1,875,000 Tons of non-hazardous wasteAnnual waste to landfill – not yet known
HCC estimate = 86 lorries in & 86 lorries out every day
Hampshire CC proposes to get . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 13
Purple Haze32 years to extract the sand + ??? years to fill the hole =around 60 years to begin heathland restoration
in 2077or
begin extraction & landfill when Blue Haze ends, i.e., after 2030
Hampshire CC proposes to take this long . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 14
Blue HazeTo contribute to meeting the landfill
requirements up to 2030
Blue Haze was due to be restored in 2020
Hampshire CC proposes to take this long . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 15
Current Purple Haze site 2011
16
Current Blue Haze site 2011
Chatsworth Blue Haze
Current Restoration
IBA
17
What’s in our backyard . . ?
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 18
The Environment Agency . . .
. . . keeping us safe
• current monitoring – Triggers• Annual Reports Submitted to Environment Agency• Environment Agency information – Water & Air
Monitoring landfill . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 19
What’s in our backyard –
What’s in Our Back Yard! . . .i.e.,Dichloromethane (DCM) (Methylene
chloride) Air <1000kg -
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) Air 111kg -
Hydrogen chloride Air <10000kg -
Particulate matter - PM10 Air <1000kg -
Acetaldehyde (Ethanal) Air <100kg -
Tetrachloroethylene (PER) Air <100kg -
Toluene Air <100kg -
Halons Air <1kg -
Benzene Air <1000kg -
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Air <100kg -
Phenol Air <10kg -
Pentene -all isomers Air <1000kg -
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) Air <10kg -
Carbon dioxide Air 24800t -
Carbon disulphide Air <1000kg -
Carbon monoxide Air <100000kg -
Carbon tetrachloride (Tetrachloromethane)
Air <10kg -
Methane Air 1180t -
Some of the chemicals
monitored by the
Environment Agency
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 20
Naphthalene Sewer <1kg -
Zinc Sewer <100kg -
Aniline (Benzeneamine) Sewer <1kg -
Arsenic Sewer <5kg -
Toluene Sewer <10kg -
Phenols - total as C Sewer <20kg -
Lead Sewer <20kg -
Fluorides - as F Sewer <2000kg -
Pentachlorophenol (PCP) Sewer <.05kg -
Chromium Sewer <20kg -
Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) Sewer <.1kg -
Halogenated organic compounds - as AOX
Sewer <1000kg -
Copper Sewer <20kg -
Mecoprop Sewer <1kg -
Cyanides - as CN Sewer <50kg -
Nonylphenols Sewer <1kg -
tert-Butyl methyl ether (MTBE) Sewer <1kg -
Ethyl benzene Sewer <10kg -
Methyl chlorophenoxy acetic acid (MCPA)
Sewer <1kg -
Phosphorus - as total P Sewer <5000kg -
Chlorides - as Cl Sewer <2000000kg -
Organotin compounds - as Sn Sewer <5kg -
Xylene - all isomers Sewer <10kg -
Nickel Sewer <20kg -
Some of the chemicals
monitored by the
Environment Agency
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 21
Blue Haze Monitoring Stations
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 23
Hampshire CC proposes to . . .
• Grab 174 football pitches for sand & landfill in our country park – close to residents
• Extend operations at Blue Haze to 2030• Quarry & then landfill Purple Haze - beyond the
scope of the plan and possibly our lifetime.• Total no of lorries per day = 372 excludes Incinerator Bottom Ash – Raymond Brown Lorries
Does Purple Haze have the potential to become heath now?
•Some nature groups think this proposal will be great, and therefore won’t raise objections, because the land will be restored
•Other nature groups object to the proposal because this area is already diverse with many rare heathland species of plants and wildlife, and
– Dorset Heaths are protected by Europe and regarded as Globally Important.
•The area used to be a heath before plantation.– The Forestry Commission make money from Moors Valley. Do they
really need to have a plantation here?
In an ideal world . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 24
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 25
Hampshire CC proposals . . .
Mean this . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 26
Hampshire CC’s proposals have potential impacts . . .
The proposals have been summarised . . . . . . next we’ll look at the potential impacts. . .
• The impacts of recreational displacement causing potential additional pressure on designated sites should be included in the assessment
• 10,000 people per year use the accesses from the B3081 – will they put more pressure on the heaths?
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 27
“The Plan should aim to avoid or repair the fragmentation and isolation of natural habitats and to contribute to the delivery of priority habitats identified in national and / or local Biodiversity Action Plans, particularly in Biodiversity Opportunity Areas”
Natural England response to HCC proposals
What the experts say . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 28
“the UK Government is committed to the European Landscape Convention, which aims to promote the protection, management and planning (including active design and creation ) of Europe’s landscapes. It stresses that people and their surroundings need to be at the heart of spatial planning and sustainable development”
Natural England response to HCC proposals
Impact on Moors ValleyWhat the experts say . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 29
“we do not see how it would be possible to replicate artificially the natural hydrological features of the catchment, either during operation or subsequently (with or without landfill) and therefore avoid adverse effect on the Dorset heath N2k sites (particularly the SAC and Ramsar). In these circumstances the part of the possible allocation forming the catchment of Ebblake Bog could not be implemented or be part of a statutory plan”
Natural England Response to HCC proposals
Impact on Moors ValleyWhat the experts say . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 30
• Several Nightjar Territories• Habitat Suitable for European Protected Species
– Sand Lizard– Smooth Snake
“the forestry plantations on Dorset heathland (including Ringwood Forest) have been identified as the critical area nationally for the re-establishment of open habitats if the objectives of the Government’s open habitat policy (‘When to convert woods and forests to open habitat in England: Government policy: March 2010’) are to be achieved. “
Natural England Response to HCC Proposals
Impact on Moors ValleyWhat the experts say . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 31
• Will the quality of the heathland restored, following landfill, be lower than that of heathland on the natural geology, established following the rotational removal of plantation?
• Will the seed bank of rare plants survive?
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 32
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 33
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
TranquillityWikipedia: The word tranquillity . . . . . . . . refers to an
assortment of policy and planning guidance documents, where interpretation of the word is typically linked to engagement with the natural environment.
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 34
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
SSSIs
Ebblake Bog
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 35
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
Fire risk
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 36
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
Cycle tracks & walks
Example: Long Forest Walk - 5 miles/8km, 2 hours“Discover the quieter areas of the Forest
including Pine Avenue. Gravel and dirt track with some gentle rises.”
Reduced by 30%No longer a circular
loop trail
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 37
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
Tumuli
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 38
Impact on Moors Valley . . .
Visitors
The Lookout
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 39
Good News
There is some good news . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 40
Successful campaigns . . .
• Campaigners win landfill battle Residents of four Derbyshire villages have won a legal victory in the battle to stop a third landfill waste disposal site being opened near their homes
• SHOTWELL — Some Wake County neighbors fought a major landfill and won Monday night
• Residents win support over Houghton-le-Spring landfill fears
• JUBILANT Milnsbridge residents have won their 18-month battle to close down a waste transfer station.
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 41
About HCC’s proposals & their impact . . .
Question & Answer Session
Sarah Sumner : Hon Sec Association of Verwood Residents
“no2purplehaze” Campaign Operations & Press Liaison Lead
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 42
About the issues . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 43
Hampshire CC’s proposals . . .
Why this campaign is so important . . .
Source Date Range % of sampleEbblake door knocking 9 May - 20 May 28.0Social contacts 13 Apr - 10 May 17.3LAG meeting/minutes 14 Mar - 9 May 16.0AVR messages 15 Mar - 6 May 14.7Press news items 6 May - 16 May 6.7Campaign leaflet 24 May - 2 Jun 5.3
Verwood Cllrs flyer 24 Mar - 29 Mar 4.0Cllr emails 30 Mar - 13 Apr 4.0Facebook 15 Apr 2.7Ebblake ONLY flyer 22 Apr 1.3
Awareness Analysis at 7 June 2011
16 responses received at HCC by24th March 2011
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 44
“ The following key issues were raised regarding Purple Haze and its potential impacts on:1.Nearby residents2.Moors Valley Country Park (including direct impacts on the Park, as well as indirect effects to local economy and nearby designated areas from the displacement of current visitors3.Loss of informal recreational land4.Dorset Heathland SPA, SAC and Ramsar sites and nearby SSSIs5.Habitats and biodiversity (e.g. nightjars, sand lizards, smooth snakes, slowworms, grass snakes, adders, deer, rabbits and squirrels)6.Quality of the heathland after restoration7.Quality and speed of restoration due to the potential unavailability of nonhazardous waste8.Need for careful design of public access to protect the biodiversity interest of the site after restoration
Hampshire CC’s proposals : issues raised in Summary of Responses . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 45
9. Flooding10. Groundwater and hydrology, which might impact nearby watercourses,
including Moors River System SSSI and Ebblake Bog SSSI11. Recently installed water pipe running through the area12. Need to consider the site strategically as part of the Ringwood Forest13. Concentration of extraction activities in this area compared to the rest of
Hampshire14. Traffic (e.g. on the B3081 and A35), road safety and road wear, including
cumulative impacts of traffic from other sites in the area and proposed residential and commercial developments
15. Need for road haulage as the site has no connection by rail and is remote from the larger waste producing settlements of Hampshire
16. Access, particularly as the identified access point to the site is also used as access to the Country Park
17. Need for HGVs to avoid Verwood
Hampshire CC’s proposals : issues raised in Summary of Responses . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 46
18. Landscape, particularly impacts on the enclosed and nearby tumuli19. Tranquillity20. Four Scheduled Ancient Monuments21. Vibration, dust and noise pollution22. Odour (as already present from the existing, nearby landfill)23. Levels of rubbish strewn across the road24. Airport safeguarding zone if food waste is landfilled25. Plans outlined in local plans, such as the East Dorset Core Strategy, Local
Transport Plan and Heathlands Joint Development Plan Document (e.g. to develop the area, restore more heathland and establish a cycle route in the area)
Hampshire CC’s proposals : issues raised in Summary of Responses . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 47
“Several respondents commenting on the Purple Haze site felt there had been insufficient communication with residents and organisations across Hampshire’s border, which resulted in very short time scales for responding to the consultation.
This opinion has also been expressed in further communications and responses that have been received after the close of the consultation.”
Hampshire CC’s proposals : issues raised in Summary of Responses . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 48
Blue Haze
“ Due to the proximity of the site to the suggested Purple Haze site, similar concerns apply. Please see the responses given to Purple Haze for further details.
The key issues raised specifically concerning Blue Haze were regarding:
1.Concern that the current height of the site would be increased2.Continuing need for bird exclusion measures as long as food waste is received “
Hampshire CC’s proposals : issues raised in Summary of Responses . . .
Impact on Moors Valley
To consider the issues, and so shape our objections, we need to understand the impact of the proposals . . . . . . let’s look at them in detail, bearing in mind HCC has said “where potential impacts are identified, measures are put in place to either avoid, reduce or potentially compensate for the impact”
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 49
Hampshire CC’s proposals . . . the issues . . .
About the issues . . .
Traffic
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 50
About the issues . . .
Health & Pollution
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 51
About the issues . . .
Open spaces
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 52
About the issues . . .
House Prices
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 53
The Hypothetical Scenario:En-route from Ringwood to Verwood and along
approximately 2miles of the B3081 you see: the Purple Haze site extraction clearly tree felling large plant machinery land excavation noticeable HGV activity local signage opposing the landfill
About house prices . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 54
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
1.0mile
0.5mile
1.5miles
Linear Valuation Model (LVM)
Zone 42.0miles
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 55
Zone 1Zone 2
Zone 3
1.0mile
0.5mile
1.5miles
Contingent Valuation Model (CVM)
Zone 42.0miles
Expected to experience the largest impact
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 56
Result
Zone 1 0 - 0.5miles
Zone 2 0.5 - 1.0miles
Zone 3 1.0 - 1.5miles
Zone 4 1.5 - 2.0miles
Property Value (£) -15.30% -9.80% -5.20% -2.70%
200,000£ 30,600£ 19,600£ 10,400£ 5,401£ 225,000£ 34,425£ 22,050£ 11,700£ 6,076£ 250,000£ 38,250£ 24,500£ 13,000£ 6,751£ 275,000£ 42,075£ 26,950£ 14,300£ 7,427£ 300,000£ 45,900£ 29,400£ 15,600£ 8,102£ 325,000£ 49,725£ 31,850£ 16,900£ 8,777£ 350,000£ 53,550£ 34,300£ 18,200£ 9,451£ 375,000£ 57,375£ 36,750£ 19,500£ 10,125£ 400,000£ 61,200£ 39,200£ 20,800£ 10,800£
Property Value Reduction (£)
This study and final percentage results are concluded using information from:
DEFRA - Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs.
Cambridge Econometrics.Local Estate Agents and Public.Approximately 6’100 GB landfill sitesand over 550’000 housing transactions.
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 57
About the issues . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 58
Entrance to Verwood & screening
About the issues . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 59
Wildlife & Environment
About the issues . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 60
3 generations affected
About the issues . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 61
for Heathland
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 62
Will HCC’s proposals affect you . . ?
• Traffic• Health• Open Spaces• Entrance to Verwood / Screening• Moor Valley / Screening• Wildlife / Environment• Heath• House Prices• 3 Generations• Moors Valley Users
Cllr Spencer Flower: Leader of East Dorset District Council
Cabinet Member for Corporate Resources at Dorset County Council
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 63
The Councillor’s Perspective
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 64
About the issues . . .
Question & Answer Session
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 65
Saying “No!” to Hampshire County Council
Comfort Break
Britt Poyntz : Ebblake resident living less than 500 metres from Purple Haze
“no2purplehaze” Campaign Manager
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 66
The Consultation process
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 67
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 68
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 69
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
Continue sending objections to HCC &
register to be consulted
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 70
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 71
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
Continue sending objections to HCC &
register to be consulted
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 72
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adoptedMUST respond to HCC at this stage
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 73
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adopted
About HCC’s process . . .
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 74
Date Step OutcomeOct/Nov 2010 Cabinet & Council Decision on approach to HMWDFDec 2010 Stakeholder Engagement Stakeholders told Next StepsFeb/Mar 2011 Have Your Say (Consult) Discussed options on locationSummer 2011 Revise Plan Have Your Say by 24/3/11 consultation
comments feed the PlanSept/Oct 2011 Cabinet, Council & Partners Plan presented for agreement
Nov/Dec 2011 Statutory Consultation 6 week "soundness" consultation must evidence local input
Jan/Feb 2012 Submission to Sec of State Development Plan evidence required of consultation process
Spring 2012 Public Examination Independent Plan Review by Planning Inspectorate rep.
Summer 2012 Adoption by HCC & Ptnrs HMWP adoptedMUST respond to HCC at this stage
Resources to be available
• Town Meeting at the start with Hampshire CC Planning Policy for Minerals & Waste - tba
• Issues summary, Plan dependent - website• Research notes - website• Source documents – website• Campaign Forum for Q&A sessions - website• Support network for non Internet users
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 75
Campaign Next StepsWe will tell you more about these events in Interest Group updates . . .
5 Jul “Design a Window Poster” competition winners announced10 Jul mob email bash - focus on our MP, Bob Walters 16 Jul Walk the Boundary, leafleting tbc Nature Detectives: to be led by Dorset Wildlife Trust. Gather evidence
in the school holidays of Moors Valley’s wildlife & flowers23 Jul to 19 Aug “Door Knock Your Neighbours” month 3 Aug Leaflet Ringwood Market 13 Aug mob leaflet Moors Valley 20 Aug Walk the Boundary, leafleting3/4 Sep Visit Blue Haze (to be confirmed) to establish local relationship just
like other communitiesDates to be advised: Morrisons + Moors Valley Produce Market - manned display
stands
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 76
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 77
What we’ll do next is . . .
Questions?
Meeting Objectives
After this meeting you should have an increased knowledge of:
1.Hampshire County Council’s proposals and their potential impact on our town, its residents & the surrounding countryside
2.What will happen next in the HCC consultation process
3. . . . and how you will be able to contributePublic Meeting 20/6/2011 78
Meeting close
• Feedback? – email: [email protected]– Address: 14 Ebblake Close, Verwood, BH31 6GF
• Safe journey home
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 79
This slide pack will made available on the campaign website
www.no2purplehaze.co.uk
Consider this . . .
"In the end we will conserve only what we love, we will love only what we understand,
we will understand only what we are taught”
Baba DioumSenegalese Environmentalist
Public Meeting 20/6/2011 80