SAVI Colloquium. Build safety using an integrated approach Provincial Strategic Objective 5:...
-
Upload
virginia-bennett -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of SAVI Colloquium. Build safety using an integrated approach Provincial Strategic Objective 5:...
Build safety using an integrated approach
Provincial Strategic Objective 5: Increasing safetyOur pathway to learning
Deep dive academic
research into existing
community projects
Development of best principles
opposed to best practices
Timeframe: No quick fixPre- Design-Pilot-Learning -Implementation
• It is about fixing the future• Whole of Society approach• Don’t see safety budget as law
enforcement only but consider alternatives to complement law enforcement
• Focus on removing opportunities for crime
NDP: Chapter 12: Building Safer CommunitiesHow to achieve it ?
Recommendations of NDP(National Development Plan: Chapter 12: page 350)
• Strengthen the criminal justice system
• Make the police service professional
• Demilitarise the police service
• Build safety using an integrated approach
• Build community participation in community safety
Building Safer CommunitiesA Provincial Perspective
• Strengthen the criminal justice system
• Make the police service professional
• Demilitarise the police service
• Build safety using an integrated approach
• Build community participation in community safety
Limited to provincial oversight
“Whole of Society”
Constructing change within governmentLevers of control
• Hierarchy of policies
• Constitution, Laws, Regulations, Policies, Directives
• Influence allocation of budgets
• Multi terms expenditure frameworks 0+2
• Understand barriers of integration
• Alignment with PMFA
• Operational challenges
Western Cape Community Safety Act 3 of 2013
Promoting Professional Policing through effective
oversight
Building Safety Partnerships
Integrated safety information Whole of
society
Examples of PSO 5 project's alignment with the NDP Community Police Forums
• NDP Objective: Community participation in community safety
• The NDP seeks to achieve the mobilisation of communities (CPFs) with dedicated budgets and cost-benefit analysis improving on their effectiveness
• The Expanded Partnership Programme (EPP) provides for the statutory functions of CPF’s to be captured as service delivery standards linked to a financing model and measurable outcomes.
Payment model linked to predetermined standards of service delivery (example)
Monthly preformance report Form: EPP1/2012
CPF: Kraaifontein Month: Oct
Activity Verification
1 Was the electronic report compiled and submitted by CPF Field worker Yes
2 Was CPF exco meeting held within calender month Section 3.1.1 Yes
3 How many people attended said meeting Section 3.1.4 7
4 Did SAPS attend said meeting Section 3.1.11 Yes
5 Did DoCS attend said meeting Section 3.1.12 Yes
6 Was Public Accountability Meeting held within calender month Section 3.2.1 Yes
7 How many people attended said meeting Section 3.2.4 20
8 Did the CPF exco meet with Station Commander during month Section 3.3 Yes
9 Were the issues discussed recorded with comments Section 3.3.1/4 Yes
10 Was the 200 words report completed and of quality Section 3.3 Yes
11 Number of observation visits undertaken by CPF Section 4.1 <10
12 Is 200 words site report completed Section 4 Yes
13 Number of complaints received from public Section 5.6 <10
14 Evaluation of station recorded Section 6. 1A/2B Yes
14 Information about Neighbourhood Watch structures provided? Section 7.1/15 Yes
15 Was safety information provided Section 8 Yes
16 Was information on partnerships provided Section 9 Yes
17 Is 200 words report on state of safety completed Section 10 Yes
18 Was monthly news letter compiled and distributed Copy provided Yes
19 Number of SMS shortcode reports forwarded to DoCS Section 5.8 <10
20 Environmental factors reported Section 8.5 Yes
I herewith certify that the information captured is a true reflection of the electronicreports received from CPF
Fieldworker Date
Work verified.
Supervisor Date
Legal mandate: (Section 18 (1) (b) of SAPS Act)Promote communication between service and community
Service standard: Number of meeting with Station Commissioner
Measurable outcome
1 2 3 4 5 60.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Apr(34.38%)
May(25.00%)
Jun(15.63%)
Jul(34.38%)
Aug(18.75%)
Sep(25.00%)
15.STATION COMMISSIONER IN-TERVIEW