Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

download Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

of 22

Transcript of Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    1/22

    Save the Children

    meeting 30 April, London

    Hunger and Undernutrition Reduction:

    Overcoming Disconnects and Neglect

    Lawrence Haddad

    Institute of Development Studies

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    2/22

    Outline

    Connecting agriculture andundernutrition

    Overcoming neglect of hunger andundernutrition

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    3/22

    Why doesnt agriculture do more toreduce undernutrition?

    In terms of the productive sectors, agricultural growthtends to be a more integral part of nutrition-sensitive

    development than nonagricultural growth, but the effect

    of agricultural growth on nutrition is conditional upon thesize of the sector, the extent to which food insecurity isa problem, and the extent to which agricultural growth

    delivers increased food availability. The main exception

    to this statement is that the result does not appear toapply in India.

    (An econometric study)

    Headey 2011. Turning Economic Growth into Nutrition-Sensitive

    Growth . IFPRI.

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    4/22

    Successes in fighting undernutrition

    Headey 2011

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    5/22

    Failures in addressing undernutrition

    Headey 2011

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    6/22

    Reasons for disconnects

    Agriculture not a big enough sector

    Not generating enough income and employment forthe poorest

    Not enough of an incentive for agriculture to focus onnutrition

    Where there is a focus on nutrition, it is ineffective

    Maybe it is having an impact, but we cannot isolate it

    due to weak impact culture in agriculture

    Poor enabling environment overwhelms agriculturesefforts, e.g. womens empowerment, watsan, health,political priorities

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    7/22

    Invest in Less Favoured or More Favoured Agricultural Land?It depends what the objective is

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    8/22

    Systematic Review of Agricultural Interventionsthat do try to improve nutrition status

    23 studies found

    13 collected heights and weights of children

    8 investigated differences between control andproject

    1/8 had a positive significant impact on stunting, 3/8on underweight and 2/8 on wasting

    Half of the studies in which no significant differentwas found did not have large enough sample sizes todetect a difference if it existed!

    Masset, Haddad, Cornelius, Isaza-Castro BMJ 2012

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    9/22

    Invest in new technologies and farmingmethods to leverage better nutrition?

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    10/22

    Does access to farm inputs favour men?

    Source: Peterman, Behrman and Quisumbing, 2010. IFPRI Discussion Paper 975

    Number of studies

    Prioritising the needs of women farmers

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    11/22

    But how to promote the power andinfluence of women within agriculture?

    Within agriculture?

    Extension agents?

    National agricultural research systems?

    Crop choice?

    Outside of agriculture?

    Village councils?

    The courts?

    Policy?

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    12/22

    Making hunger and

    undernutrition harder to neglect Outcomes

    Real time mapping

    Commitment

    Measuring commitment

    Leadership

    Wait or Develop?

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    13/22

    Undernourishment data:Crisis, What Crisis?

    Source: Oxfam (2010) Data cited from FAO Hunger Statistics (from 1969 to 2006); UN (2009)

    2007-08Food pricespike

    Millions

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    14/22

    Comparison of Household Survey and FAO

    estimates of food energy deficiency, 1990s

    8275 73 73

    60

    52

    45 44 4440

    44

    66

    32

    45

    63

    15

    31

    4743

    21

    Ethiopia

    Burun

    di

    Malaw

    i

    Zam

    bia

    Mozamb

    ique

    Ghana

    Guin

    ea

    Tanzania

    Kenya

    Ugand

    a

    Household Survey FAO

    Spearman rank=0.43

    (p=0.21)

    Food Insecurity in Sub-Saharan Africa: New Estimates from Household Expenditure

    Surveys Lisa C. Smith Harold Alderman and Dede Aduayom. Research Report 146. 2003.

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    15/22

    Efforts to monitor hunger must be revitalised

    http://www.rapidsms.org/case-

    studies/malawi-nutritional-surviellence/

    h d d h ?

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    16/22

    Who is most committed to reducing hunger?Country Government

    expenditure rankPolicies and

    programmes rankHRCI

    (1 is best)

    Denmark 3 4 1Finland 6 9 2

    Belgium 9 7 3Ireland 5 11 3Norway 2 15 5France 11 6 5United Kingdom 14 3 5Australia 16 2 8

    Netherlands 10 88Spain 4 14 8

    Germany 12 10 11South Korea 23 1 12Japan 8 17 13Canada 13 13 14Greece 21 5 14

    Sweden 7 19 14Italy 22 12 17USA 18 18 18Austria 20 16 18Switzerland 15 22 20New Zealand 17 20 20Portugal 19 21 22

    Source: IDS at www.hrcindex.org

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    17/22

    Commitment and hunger status?

    HUNGER STATUS (GHI 2010)

    COMMITMENT Low Moderate Serious Alarming Extremely

    Alarming

    Low Rwanda

    Nepal Mozambique

    Lesotho Guinea

    BissauZambia

    Bangladesh

    Medium Ghana Kenya India Burundi

    China NigeriaSenegal

    High Malawi

    Brazil Guatemala Ethiopia

    Gambia TanzaniaUganda

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    18/22

    Citizen Feedback: Are Anti-Hunger Efforts Working?

    Randomised control trial of community-based monitoringof public primary health care providers in Uganda

    Citizen report cards reduced child mortality by 33 percent

    The study documents large increases in utilisationand improved health outcomes

    Cost per child death averted was $300, well below the

    average of $887 for 23 other interventions.

    Bjrkman, M and Svensson, J. (2009) 'Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field

    Experiment on Community Based Monitoring in Uganda, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,

    Vol 124: 2, pp 73569

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    19/22

    Improving nutrition for all.

    The Access to Nutrition Index is agroundbreaking initiative that rates food and

    beverage companies' performance in

    providing nutritious products to consumers.

    The Access to Nutrition Index is

    currently being developed.

    Sign up to stay informed or Discover

    more about the Index.

    Supported by:

    Accountability in theprivate sector

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    20/22

    Mejia-Acosta et.

    al. 2012

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    21/22

    Leadership?

    April 2012

  • 8/2/2019 Save the Children 30 April 2012 LH FINAL

    22/22

    Conclusions

    Agriculture is potentially vitalto hunger and undernutritionreduction - but it needs to bea more powerful force

    Several ways of makinghunger and undernutritionharder to ignore suggested

    Strong political courage andleadership is needed toreduce hunger