Save America -JCRyter

8/2/2019 Save America -JCRyter

1/17

hen you're a social progressive, and you can't enact the laws you need to strip away

the constitutional rights of the People, you do the next best thing. You appoint socialprogressive judges who use what appears to be legality to erase the constitutionalrights of the People under the pretext of enforcing laws that actually don't exist in order

to add phrases you need to transform Law #1 into Law #3. . How do they do it? By couplingone law with a completely unrelated law to manufacture the third law that heretofore does notexist for that purpose. If anyone's to blame, it's the lifetime appointed judge who is merely"clarifying" Law #1. Judges lack legislative authority under the Constitution. In other words, asmuch as People have been led to believe it's their prerogative to legislate from the benchwhen the laws they are sworn to uphold don't set well with their social progressive upbringing.They simply rewrite the law to fit. Their sole constitutional responsibility is to make sure thelaws penned by the legislature are fairly applied and enforced in the manner stipulated as

written.. No one can blame the legislators when judges with lifetime appointments go rogue.Or, if you're a union-represented school teacher in the State of Colorado who wants schoolexpenditures dramatically increased even though State law prevents the social progressiveswho don't control the legislature from arbitrarily increasing education spending without aserious nod from the voters, you take the People to court. Or, you belong to one or moresocialist education advocacy groups which have, since 2005, been demanding teacher salaryincreases and other education reforms through increased taxpayer-funded investments in theState's public school systemthat neither the State legislature nor the people wanted, courtaction was the only way to achieve their objective.

On June 23, 2005, the public interest law firm, Children's Voices, filed what evolvedinto Lobato v Colorado in which they asserted the Stateof Colorado wasn't meeting its constitutional obligationunder Article IX, Section 2 to provide a"thorough anduniform public school education system"as mandatedby the education clause of the State Constitution. Twolawyers forChildren's Voices, KathleenGebhardt and Alexander Halpern went shopping forplaintiffs. They found two teachers and AnthonyLobato whose daughters attended a rural school inCenter, Coloradoa town of about 2,000 peopleand


2/17

46 other taxpayers and/or parents of children in various schools. Lobato joined the lawsuitbelieving State taxpayers should be arbitrarily forced to spend a disproportionately largeramount of money in rural school districts. Lobato believed the terms "free," 'thorough" and"uniform" in Article IX meant "identical in total," not "identical" based on the allocation perstudent rather than the total sum paid to the respective schools based on the total number ofstudents enrolled. Because as it is, there is no equality in the funding levels between urban

schools and rural schools in Colorado. According to Education Week, Colorado's number oneschool district spends $37,789 per pupil, while Montezuma-Cortez (which is number 169)spends $6,746 per student.

On March 2, 2006 Denver District Court Judge Michael Martinezdismissed the lawsuitbecause [a] the case was not subject to judicial review, [b] the current educational financesystem met the requirements of Article IX, and finally, [c] the school districts (which also filedas plaintiff) did not have legal standing to sue the Colorado school system for increasedfunding. The decision was appealed, and a 3-judge panel for the Colorado Court of Appealsupheld Judge Martinez's decision that the school districts did not have thestanding to sue, nor did they have a right to challenge school financingsince that was legally the responsibility of the legislature. Children's

Voices appealed again. In 2009, the Colorado Supreme Courtoverturned Martinez, citing a 4-3 vote in a 1982 case, Lujan v ColoradoState Board of Education, 649 P.2d 1005, in which the Court of Appealsused a federal court precedent to decide the case which dealt with fundingequity. The Appeals Court ruled that the State Constitution did not requireabsolute equality in either school spending or educational services. TheState Supreme Court disagreed, claiming the federal right of judicial reviewdid not constitutionally exist in this case since the funding of education in Colorado is the solepurview of the legislaturewith the consent of the voters. In Colorado, the social progressivesnow control the State Supreme Court. They believe social justice always trumps the rule oflaw..

During the election of 2010, the Pueblo (Colorado) Chieftain, and many of the State's leadingnewspapers, advocated on behalf of dumping the State's Supreme Court justices under aadvocacy campaign called Clear the Bench Colorado. The Chieftain said: "Justices MichaelBender,Alex MartinezandNancy Rice, the only Supreme Court members up this year,ought to be removed from the bench. The voters need only vote 'no' on the ballot. These

justices consistently have upheld tax increases without requiring voter approval, in directdefiance of the TABOR Amendment(Amendment 23) of the Colorado Constitution."

The Chieftain continued: "Since Colorado changed from contested elections for judicial officeto a merit selection and retention system, appointing judges followed by periodic votes tokeep or remove them, no Colorado Supreme Court justice has been voted out of office...

Although some have left the bench voluntarily. Chief Justice Mary Mullarkeyresigned so shewould not have to face the voters this year."

In Colorado, here's the problem: According to a "costing-out study" performed forthe Colorado Legacy FoundationbyAugenblick, Palaich & Associates, Colorado schools areunderfunded by between $3.56 and $4.15 billion per year. APA was the "expert" hiredby Children's Voices who testified on behalf of the Colorado school boards that the Coloradoschool system is sorely unfundedby about $4 million, an amount equal to that currentlybeing spent in all of the State's classrooms.


3/17

There's not a single school district in Colorado, according to their report, that's adequatelyfunded. The deficits in Colorado and most of the States being invaded by illegals are theresult of changing demographicsparticularly with the increasing number of Englishlanguage learnerscompounded by the fact that Colorado, like most States sincethe Obama advent, is facing severe budget cuts. In the State of Colorado, funding isdetermined by the Public School Finance Act of 1994. According to the plaintiffs suing the

State for more money for schools, the defendants in the action have never conducted a studyto determine how much more money is needed to adequately fund the State's school system.

In her ruling on Dec. 9, 2011, Denver District Court Judge SheilaRappaport agreed with the APA assessment noting that in her view, "thesystem is significantly underfunded..."even though the State spends 45% oftheir annual State budget (or $3.2 billion) on K-thru-12 education. Because theschool districts wanted more money, Rappaportlike most social progressivesbelieved they were entitled to it even though Colorado Constitution

Amendment 23 gives the State legislature complete authority over thebudgets. Rappaport's judicial weakness, according to her peers, is her lack ofknowledge of the proper application of the law.

In point of fact, although every school district in the country wants more money, and wouldlike to be able to just stick their hand in the taxpayer cookie jar and take what they wantwhenever they feel they need it, every State has protocols that determine how schools arefunded. Colorado's State legislature budgets what they intend the school system tohaveand, per the State Constitution, the voters must then approve what thelegislature passes before the funds are available for the school system. The taxpayer isthe final word. And, since it is their children who are being taught in the State's schools, theyare best arbitrator of what the school districts need. Living within its means is the job of theschool boards based on the budget established by the legislature and the voters. Thus, whilethe bureaucrats in the teachers' unions may want more money, what the State provided wassufficientif the school boards live within their budgets. But that's the problem with social

progressive. Budgets, to them, are simply the starting point of financial negotiations, not thetotal money available.

Rappaport, like most judges who believe they have the arbitrary right to impose judicialreview on everything, chose to ignore that the fact that the Colorado State Constitution doesnot give the court system the right of judicial review on the funding of its schools. But,since Rappaport believes the State is underfunded, they need to solve the problem and findan additional $2 billion to $3.75 billion for educationeven though doing so would consume89% of the State's entire budget, or it would force the State to virtually double the taxload ofColoradoans. Sadly, social progressives simply don't grasp the reality of the buck. When thetaxpayers run out of money, unlike the government, they can't crank up the printing press in

the basement and print more. At that point, the taxpayer has two choices: pay the increasedtaxes and let their personal debt obligations slide to where they risk losing their homes andpersonal possessions, or they fight back. Today, the taxpayers are fighting back because theyknow there's no way government can wring even an ounce of liquidity from their budgetsbecause there's not a drop of discretionary income left for them to spend. State pensionstoday are robbing the State coffers of at half or more of every tax dollar the goes into thetreasury.

Denver Postcolumnist Mike Rosen recently commented that the Lobato case defied logic.He remembered a piece of advise on the practicality of decision-making that Gen. Douglas


4/17

MacArthurreceived from his father. "Never give an order,"Gen. Arthur MacArthurtold hisson, "unless you're certain it will be carried out."If you do the math, you realize that increasedschool district funding will have to come from the existing kitty. The social progressives inColorado managed to get a special school-funding initiative on the ballot in November, 2011.The voters shot it down 64% to 36%. That means, if the State is obligated to increase schoolspending based on Rappaport's ruling, it would have to wipe out the budget for the State

Highway Patrolas well as any money to maintenance and upgrade the roads, includingsnow removal in the winteras well as no funding for higher education, and nothing for theenvironment or for Medicare or Medicaid.

What is most interesting is that after making her ruling, Rappaport stayed her decision untilthe end of the 2012 legislation sessionin the summer of 2013. It sounds like Sheila's afraidthat her decision might end her career in November. "Clear the Benches Colorado"isforemost on her mind. By staying her decision on Lobato until the summer of 2013, thetaxpaying-voters of Colorado won't be thinking about the consequencesofRappaport's Lobatodecision when they walk into the voting booth in November of thisyear. And they need to be because the shortfall that will rob the taxpayers will still be theshortfall that robs the taxpayers after the election.

Historically, judges are no different than any other agenda-driven politicians. Their firstinstinct is self-preservation. Sadly, America's courts have been polluted by politicians whoare elected and serve with agendas fashioned not by what's best for the nation or the voterswho elect them, but what's best for the princes of industry and the barons of banking andbusiness who not only own the politicians whose war chests they fill with money, but they alsoown the jurists they endorse for the federal bench through the Congressmen and Senatorswho give their recommendations to both the governors and presidents who then nominatethem. You can always tell the most corrupt judges by how fast they move up through the

judicial oligarchy.

Associate Supreme Court Justice Sonia Maria Sotomayoris a good example of a corrupt

bureaucrat fast-tracked to the high court specifically to build a majority of justices who wouldadvocate on behalf of social justice and kill the rule of law in the American legalsystem. When New York Sen.Daniel Patrick Moynihan [D-NY] used a ploy to leveragePresident George HW Bush's Chief-of-StaffJohn Sununu to get Sotomayor, a low level,do-nothing completely unknown 5 year New York City Assistant District Attorney with nodecision-making authority. She was so lackluster that she finally left the DA's office and hungup a private shingle handling illegal aliens being expelled from the country. With absolutely no

judicial experience except as a paper chaser, Sotomayorshould never have been onanyone's radar screen for a municipal judgeship let alone a federal judgeship.

In 1992, in his last year in office, Bush-41's judicial appointments were gridlocked. Bush wastrying to get seven moderate judges appointed before the November election, but the

Democratic majority decided to play the wait-and-see-game. If they won the White House in1992, the appointments would be their's to make. If they lost, they could deal with Bush inJanuary, 1993. It was then that Senate JudiciaryCommittee Chairman Moynihan offered Sununo what was going to be the bestdeal Bush was going to get.. Moynihan said ifBush-41 would let him pick two federal

judges, the Senate Judiciary Committee would not contest the five judges ofBush picked.

One would assume that Bush looked over her historywhat there was of it. He didn't. He leftthat task to Sununo.Sununo found no red flags. But then, he wasn't looking for any. Whatwas buried beneath the surface was a personality character trait that Moynihan knew only
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2009/090603.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2009/090603.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2009/090603.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2009/090603.html


5/17

because he knew her.Sotomayorwas the perfect sleeper. She is a radical Marxist and anHispanic bigot who wears her biases like a badge of courage. Sheembraces "identity politics" (which incorporates the principles ofcategorical representation [i.e., minorities are best represented byminority judges since White judges will always be biased against allminority litigants]). Even more to Moynihan's liking, Sotomayoris an

extremely radical jurist who has made it clear in most of her decisionsthat "...law is made at the appellate level"of the federal judiciary.

And finally, Sotomayorbelieves that federal judges have the right,through reinterpretation, to rewrite the laws of the nation if they don'tagree with them. In her hearing for elevation to the appellate courtunderBill Clinton5 years after her appointment to the US DistrictCourt by Moynihan (i.e., George H.W. Bush). (It is important that thereaders understand thatSotomayorwas the first federal judge not

picked by, vetted by, or selected for the federal bench by a USPresident.)Although Sotomayorwas heralded by the Democrats as a Republicannomination, the GOP help up her appointment to the appellate court for a year because now

she had a track recordas a far left activist judge who paid no attention to the rule of law.Most of her decisions at the District level were overturned. One hundred percent of herappellate court decisions were overturned by the high court. Not because she knowsnothing about the rule of law, but simply because she does not respect it.

Citizens who are scholastic students of politics or just lay students believe that the practice ofbuying and selling political patronage is a game that plays out equally (although for differentstakes) in local, county, State and federal elections. Few people realize that some of the mostimportant horse-trading takes place with the selection of judges since they are thethoroughbreds who are in the race for the duration not because federal judges are lifetime

jobs but because most judicial decisions, good or bad, outlive the judge who made it. .

Florida Congressman Alcee Hastings [D-FL] used to be US District Court Judge for a newlycreated US District Court for the Southern District of Florida by President Jimmy CarterinBroward County in 1979. In 1981 Hastingswas charged with accepting a $150 thousandbribe to mitigate the sentence of two Florida mobsters, Frank andThomas Romano whowere charged with 21 counts of racketeering. The eyewitness to the bribing waspurportedly William Borders, who reportedly delivered the bribeto Hastings.Borders took a plea agreement but, frightened that he wouldbe killed if he admitted being the bagman, Borders refused to testify incourt. His plea agreement revoked, Borders was sent to prisonand Hastings' case moved to Congress. By a vote of 413 to3, Hastings was impeached. He was convicted by the Senate 69 to 26

two votes more than needed to remove him from office. Onceagain Borders was called to testify. Once again he refused to incriminatehimself, and once again he was sent to prison. The most interesting asidein theHastings impeachment was the fact that Sen. Arlen Specter[R-PA](the turncoat politician that Sen. Rick Santorum campaigned for in hisprimary race when Congressman Pat Toomey [R-PA] was trying to unseatpro-abortion Specter) voted to acquit Hastings and keep him on thefederal bench. Is this a Christian that the American people want to


6/17

lose to Barack Obama? Because, believe me, a guy who can't hold his own Senate seatcan't win the White House.

Letting the stench of his impeachment and removal from office die down from Oct. 30, 1989 toNovember, 1992, Hastings decided to see ifBill Clinton's coattails were large enough for agrifter to piggyback to the House of Representatives. Once again Hastings had the goodfortune of getting a brand new, never been used before, Congressional District, the 23rd. He

came in second in the Democratic primary to the popular former Minority Leader of the FloridaHouse, Lois Frankel, and beat her in a run-off electioneven though the Wall StreetJournalreported allegations that Hastings had sexually harassed a female staff memberduring the campaign.

Setjudicialcorruption aside for a moment and look at academician corruption. The sameprinces of industry and the same barons of banking and business who buy politicians and

judges also buy college and university department chairs by endowing them with hundreds ofthousands to millions of dollars. Why? Because the international political, cultural andeconomic machines who are close to achieving their objective of world government learnedfrom the Soviets from 1917 to 1985 and in the United States from 1921 to 2012. Historytaught not only the Soviets but the Italian fascists, the Nazis, the Cuban communists, theChinese communists and most of all, the Muslim Caliphs that you can educate freedom out ofthe minds of ensuing generations of children in the classroomsand fill the education voidyou create with any historic myth you want the youth of that nation to believe. The princes ofindustry and the barons of banking and business are determined to create a political unicornone political master over all of mankind. George Orwell's Big Brother.

In our world today, the princes of industry who funded most of the colleges and universities inthe western world, also had a lot of financial sway over who became the dean and/orchancellor of those institutions. And, to a large degree, they. also controlled the philosophicalviews of the boards of regents who pick the professors who hold the department chairs. Notall of those dollars come from Americans who believe in the red, white and blue. Increasingly,

we are not paying enough attention to the pedigrees of foreign donors. Many are radical, anti-American foreign nationals (particularly from Saudi Arabia) who endow our colleges anduniversities with mega-million dollar endowments that will be usedwith the knowledge andconsent of the university and college regentsto brainwash United States students with anti-

American, anti-free enterprise, anti-rule of law rubbish that will prepare them for a lifestylemore like Orwell's"1984"than John Bunyon's Pilgrim's Progress. And, if the endowmentsare large enough, the strings are okay as well.

Increasingly we are seeing the bastions of education in America with well-financedDepartments of Middle East Studies, political science departments focused more on theMideast than the western democracies, and Middle East Ancient and Modern Historydepartments and, or course, Islamic culture departments. Within the last five years or so we

have witnessed the Saudi government give a $20 million grant for a Middle East StudiesDepartment to the University of Arkansas; $22.5 million for Mideast Studies to HarvardUniversity; $28.1 million to Georgetown University; $11 million to Cornell University; and $5million each to Berkeley; $5 million to MIT, Rutgers and Columbia. (Columbia lied when askedby the media if the money came from Saudi Arabia.) Other receiving Islamic education grantsincluded Texas A&M, Princeton, Rutgers (which now has a very large Muslim studentpopulation), Johns Hopkin, UC Santa Barbara, Rice University, American University.University of Chicago, University of South Carolina, UCLA, Howard University, DukeUniversity, Syracuse University and scores of other institutions of higher education from major


7/17

Ivy League colleges to small community colleges that most parents believe they are still safeplaces to send their children to be educated.. Increasingly, I believe, we need to home schoolour children from K-through Bachelor's Degree.

If the dilemmaand who is responsible for the problemis not clear to you right now (or, atleast when you finish this piece), I am sad to say, it never will be. You can't impeach schoolteachers. But you can fire them (at least. those without tenure). But, it's like firing

politicians. Remember when Washington State enacted a term limits law in 1992 to keeplifetime politicians like 14-term Spokane, Washington Congressman andSpeaker of the House Tom Foley from continually seeking reelection? The lawwas enacted. But it would not go into affect until at least 25 other States alsoenacted term limits legislation. They apparently didn't want to be the only oneswith honest politicians. The Washington law would limit Congressmen to threetwo-year terms and US Senators to two six-year terms. That should be aconstitutional amendment.

The ultraliberal League of Women Voters sued, claiming it was a violation oftheir 1st Amendment free speech rights not to be able to campaign forwhomever they want. Foley joined the lawsuit. NeitherFoley nor the League ofWomen Voters nor the 9th Circuit Court seemed to know that under Article I,

Section 4 of the Constitution the States determine the time, place and mannerof the electionof Senators and Representatives. In other words, the States have the prerogative todetermine how many terms a Senator or Representative from that State may serve. Article VI,paragraph 2 makes it clear that the federal judiciary "...in every State shall b bound therebyany thing in the Constitution, or the laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

So, while the league of liberal feminist voters didn't like the idea that the People of the StateWashingtonwho clearly understood that powerful politicians with millions of dollars at theirdisposal and control over the electronic voting machines will always winterm limited Foley,the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which vacated the law, had no constitutional authority to tell

the People they violated Foley's right to run and the League of Women Voters' right tocampaign for him since the States are the final arbitrator on setting the rules how theelections within their borders will be held, and how many times an office holder can seekthat office based on the constitutional prerogative of the States.

In the end, in 1994 with the federal court saying he could run as many times as he wanted to,the people in the 5th Congressional District of Washington State spoke with a louder voice.They dumped a sitting House Speaker and elected a Republican, George Nethercutt totake Foley's seat. Nethercutt, like most of the Freshman Class of 1994, ran on a three termpledge. He would also break his word. In 2004 the 5th District dumped him in favor ofCathyRodgers, another Republican, when the 7th Congressional District was merged with the 5th.

The federal judicial system is as corrupt as the federal political systemand the union-controlled national educational system is just as corrupt. The reason is simple. The princes ofindustry and the barons of banking and business which began the wholesale buying thepoliticians in 1872 during the Credit Mobilierscandal, stole the local identity and control of thepublic school system in 1906. The National Education Association, birthed by the MarxisteducatorJohn Dewey, evolved from the National Teacher's Association in 1870. The NTAwas the nation's first teachers' union. But it smelled too much like a typical unioncommunist. It was incorporated in 1857 when unions were not the vogue and unionorganizers were known as "pinkos." The NEA, with its non-union sounding name, was


8/17

promoted as an amalgamation of teachers and parents working together to improve traditionaleducation through traditional values. It smelled starchy clean.

The public school system in America were initially controlled by the States with nointerference from the federal government since the federal government had no legal

jurisdiction over education. In 1906 America's first social progressive president, TeddyRoosevelt began the covert process of secretly nationalizing the US public school system by

chartering the National Education Association (the teacher's union) as a United Statescongressional corporation to tacitly "manage" the educational agenda through the union,thereby sidestepping much of the authority of the State Boards of Education by making itappear that the school teachers were selecting the curriculum when in fact the growingbureaucracy in Washington was doing it. At the same time, the US taxpayers were funding themalignant octopus we know today as the government-mandated "surrogate parents" of ourchildren through federal grants to the NEA who today, have the right to check the lunches ourchildren bring from home and throw those lunches in the trash can if "mama" or "papa"teacher don't think the ham sandwich, our choice of fruit and a small thermos of chocolatemilk is "balanced" enough for Juniorand charge us for the artificial cardboard tastingchicken nuggets and tatter tots and skim milk they believe is healthier.

Beginning in 1921 the Council on Foreign Relations began endowing colleges anduniversities and providing grants to the NEA to brainwash the masses that world wars can beprevented only when all nations on Earth live under one universal world government. Theeducational brainwashing initiated by the CFR was instigated first by the Soviets who knewthat to change the future of any society it was first necessary to alter the motives of thatnation's past. The Soviets adopted Dewey's panacea of progressive education ideas from theNEA and, in 1928 enticed Dewey and 24 other social progressive educators to come to theSoviet Union. Dewey stayed for over a decade, becoming the Soviet Union's first Commissarof Education.

Helping the NEA and the federal government enforce centralized control over the public

school system of the United States was the federal judiciary. Prior to the creation ofthe Department of Education by another social progressive,Jimmy Carter, in 1980, eachState had the final say over the educational curriculum within their jurisdiction. The NEAcontrolled what could be called the "national unity" of the curriculum so that students takingSAT tests in Bangor, Maine had pretty much the same educational erudition as the parallelstudents in San Diego, California. But the federal government still lacked the authority todictate the political philosophy of the curriculum taught at State leveluntilJimmy Carter'ssocial progressive 95th Congress created a new bureaucracy that would give the federalgovernment the right to brainwash our children by federalizing the education system in theUnited States. The US Dept. of Education needs to be dismantledquickly, completely and inits entirety by a Constitutional amendment that places absolute control of the education of the

nation's children in the hands of the parents at local levelthrough local county schoolboards elected at the local level when county officials are elected, with non-paid parentgroups controlling those boards. And, the NEA needs to be outlawed. So, by the way shouldpolitical contributions from anyone for any reason.Political contributions in any amount, arebribes and they must be recognized as such for any reasonand criminalized. The samething goes for earkmarks. Earmarks are an even bigger theft from the People becausepoliticians are stealing taxpayer money to pay back their campaign donors for their largessfrom hundreds of thousands of dollars to millions of dollars.
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/100308.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/100308.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/100308.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/100308.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2011/110802.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


9/17

Today, helping the federal government force politically-correct anti-Christian edicts on thechildren of Christian parents is the federal judiciary which is slowly and very meticulouslystripping from American parents their inherent right to determine what value system they wanttheir children to be taught. That right, under the guise of political correctness, has beentransferred from American parents to the State caretakers of the morality of Utopia..

In 1998 the California Board of Education leased a couple of classrooms in the Carden Hall

Elementary Schoolin Fountain Valley, CA to A Muslim named Shabbi Mansuri, who foundeda educational group called the Council on Islamic Education [CIE]. From his headquarters inan American elementary school, Mansuri planned to publish three "instructional" Islamictextbooks t0 be distributed to elementary school children with free copies of theQu'ran. Mansurihoped to introduce in the public school system not only in California, butacross the United States. Where the Constitution of the United States bans governmentschools from passing out copies of the Christian bible as a "violation of of the Danbury let ter"separation of Church and State, it is also unconstitutional by the court's current interpretationof the 1st Amendment to pass out copies of the Qu'ran since that is tantamount to promotinga national religionsomething John Adams did as President.

Mansuri's Islamic books: "Across the Centuries,""World History and Geography: Medievaland Early Modern Times,"and "The Crusaders from Medieval Europe,"were financed in partby several oil sheik and their oil partners in Standard Oiland the Seven Sisters. While clearlyall of the Islamic text books were designed to theologically brainwash their pubescentaudience, the school systemand the federal judge that ultimately heard the caseinsistedthe school board was not indoctrinating students about Islam, and thus, they did not violatethe 1st Amendment. The fact that the Council of Islamic Education had leased twoclassrooms in a government school was, in itself, a violation of the Constitution of the UnitedStates. For that reason alone the federal judge who ruled in that case, US District CourtJudge Phyllis Hamilton should have been impeached, removed from the bench and chargedwith malfeasance.

Roger Wolfertz, Deputy General Counsel for the California Department of Education toldthe Washington Times on Feb. 13, 2002 that the school system was aware that promotingany religion in the public schools violated not only the Constitution, but California's penal codeas well. Wolfertz insisted that had not happened since the Islamic instructions were focusedon ancient history and not religion. The verses Christian students were forced to read fromthe Qu'ran were cited for their ancient historic value, not as Muslim theology. .

imagine, for a moment, a protest launched by Muslim parents whose Islamic children wereforced to read the 1611 the King James Bible as a secular course in ancient history. Howlong, do you imagine, that Peggy Green (the superintendent of the Byron Union SchoolDistrictwhere this happened), would have her job after what would become an internationaloutcry? How did Green defend herself in the Feb. 13 2002 Washington Times article? She

was arrogantly dismissive. "We are not teaching religion. We are teaching the Californiastate-mandated standards with state-adopted textbooks. Dressing up in costumes, role-

playing and simulation games are used to stimulate class discussion, and are commonteaching practices used in other subjects as well."

Wolfertz and Green's arguments were flawed. If wearing a crucifix in an American publicschool today is construed by the federal judiciary as practicing religion, by what stretch ofeitherWolfertz's orGreen's imagination could they construe of forcing children to read fromthe Qu'ran as not construe that as a practice of religion? Or, in Green's case, forcing Christianstudents to dress in traditional Muslim garb, and pray on Islamic prayer rugs, not be
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


10/17

construed as practicing religion? They forced Christian children to pay homage to Allah.Adding criminal liability to that prayerfest is the fact that they did so without the consent ofChristian parents whose faiths would have construed such a voluntary deed as a rejectionofJesus Christ.

When US District Court Judge Phyllis Jean Hamilton heard the case in 2003, she ruled thatthe school board was not indoctrinating Christian students about Islam, they were merely

teaching them the secular aspects of the Muslim faith. I have a hot flash for JudgeHamilton. There are no "secular" aspects about Islam. Islam is 100%theological from its political roots to the economic branches of the tree ofIslam.. (Question: what stellar judicial experience qualified Phyllis JeanHamilton to sit on the US District Court? She was a deputy public defender inthe 1980s and in 1991, on the recommendation ofSen. Dianne Feinstein, shewas appointed a federal magistrate by retiring US District Court Judge WilliamIngram. US Magistrates are generally never advanced to District Court judgesbecause they only deal with menial cases and are thought not to have theexperience needed to become District Court Judges. Hamilton's decision in theByron Union School DistrictCase confirms she was not ready for "prime time." She was fast-

tracked to the US District Court by Bill Cliinton because of her social progressive ideology.She is also one of several federal judges who not only needs to be impeached, but foreverbanned from sitting on any court as a magistrateeven a traffic court..

It would be nice to be able to honestly say that America's judicial system, is reasonablyimmune from corruption. Sadly, it's not. And, it has not been since Franklin D. Roosevelt,the third social progressive in the White House decided to stack the high court with sixadditional social progressive jurists because nine old men (who were not communists) weresystematically dismantling his New Dealdemocratic socialismas fast as he couldimplement it for no better reason than what he was doing was blatantly unconstitutional.

Roosevelt believed that not only did he have a right to do it, but that it was imperative for the

future of the nation to dissolve the rule of law and replace it with a more benevolent form ofgovernment based on social justice. When the Supreme Court said no, Roosevelt decided toforce any justice over 65 years of age to retire. When his super majority New Deal Congressrefused to enact such a law, Roosevelt called a meeting on Feb. 4, 1937 with HouseSpeakerJohn Bankhead, Senate Judiciary Chairman Henry Ashurst and House JudiciaryChairman Hatton Sumners and told them he was introducing legislation that would raise thenumber of Justices from 9 to 15giving FDR a 10 to 5 majority opinion on all New Dealissues. Whatever laws the New Deal Congress enacted from that point forward would beconstitutional based on the majority of New Deal jurists on the high court.

Roosevelt needed justices on the high court that thought like him. He didn't get thembecause not even the New Dealers in Congress (except the communists that crept in when

America thought the Soviet Union was our friend and ally) thought like him. Socialprogressive Roosevelt, like Federalist John Adams andyesJacobin Abraham Lincoln,wanted an American dictatorship. Only Lincoln actually achieved it. But, I'm getting ahead ofmyself. That blast from the past is just ahead.

While revisionist historians have painted Abraham Lincoln as one of America's greatestpresidentsthe man who freed the slaves (based on an executive order calledthe Emancipation Proclamation issued on Sept. 22, 1862) whose sole purpose was a militaryobjectiveinciting the slaves in the Deep South to rebel against the slaveholders, andforce Jefferson Davis to commit most of the Confederacy's troops to protect the large
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


11/17

plantations in the South. Not only did the Emancipation Proclamation not free any slaves inNorth, nor did it free any slaves in any Southern State bordering a Northern State.

When you study the unvarnished, factual histories ofLincoln by scholars such as GeorgeMason UniversityProfessorThomas J. DiLorenzo and Edgar Lee Masters (who wasprobably the nation's most honest Lincoln historian), you will learn that the man who won theElection of 1860 with a 39% mandate to govern, personally caused the secession of all of the

Southern States beginning with South Carolina on Dec. 20, 1860. Unlike the log cabin,homespun likableWill Rogers' type fables about Abe the country lawyera portrait paintedby revisionist historians, Lincoln was a very powerful, wealthy railroad lawyer who wasdeeply in bed with the industrialists, bankers and vast landholders in the Northeast who hadblood ties with the landed gentry of Europe with royal blood coursing through their veins.Lincoln's cohorts were the descendants of the Jacobins and Masons and the students of theIlluminati who were trying to assassinate all of Europe's monarchs as American patriots werepenning the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia.

The Jacobins controlled Congress and with it, how the tax receipts of the nation were spent.For the most part, taxes assessed to Southern plantation owners were spent by the princes ofindustry in the north to expand roads and build railroad tracks from northern cities into theWest. The South wanted a more equitable distribution of the tax receipts, but lacked the votesto win them on the floor of Congress since black slaves counted as 3/5ths of a person butIrish immigrants in the East and Asian immigrants in the west, who were treated not muchbetter than slaves, counted as a whole person in Congress. The political cauldron that wasboiling was not about slavery from 1854 to 1860, it was about States' rights. The JacobinRepublicans controlled every piece of legislation that went through Congress from 1856 to1878. States rights, except as defined by the Jacobins, no loner existed. And, it was States'rights, not slavery, that caused the South to secede.

When South Carolina seceded in December, 1860, Lincoln's mistake was denouncing theirright to leave the union, since every State in the Union believed it was the inherent right of

any State to renounce Statehood at any time and become an independent Republic. Thenotion, Lincoln said, was "an ingenious sophism,"stating that the central governmentpossessed "sacred supremacy"and was obligated to use whatever force was needed torestore South Carolina to the union. Mississippi followed South Carolina on Jan. 9, 1861. Thefollowing day Florida seceded, and on the 11th, Alabama. Georgia joined the Confederacy onJan. 19, 1861 followed by Louisiana on Jan. 26. Texas joined the Confederacy on Feb. 1, andVirginia followed 44 days later. Arkansas and North Carolina seceded in May and Tennessee,the holdout State, seceded on June 8. Each of these States left the union because the centralgovernment of the United States, and more specifically, the Jacobins in Congress and in the

White House stripped the States of their inherent, God-given right to liberty.

Lincoln needed money to conscript enough troops to teach South Carolina a

lesson and force that State back into the Union. As Americans prepared to goto war with their neighbors, one wayward rogue State became an 11 StateConfederacy. A new nation had been born inside the United States of

America because of the arrogance of one manAbraham LincolnLincoln arrogantly ignored the Constitution, imposed a 3% graduatedincome tax through theRevenue Act of 1861 which the JacobinCongress enacted, and he signed into law on August 5, 1861.

The fact that an income tax was unconstitutional bothered no one ingovernment, nor any of the Justices on the Supreme Court. Lincoln needed
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


12/17

money to field an army. Before proposing the tax, Lincoln met with Salmon Portland Chase,his Treasury Secretary who assured Lincolnthe tax was legal. Chase would become ChiefJustice of the Supreme Court and preside over the impeachment of President AndrewJohnson. Chase was also one of the key conspirators in the assassination ofAbrahamLincoln). Also agreeing that an income tax was legal (because he was too weak to argue thepoint) was Secretary of the Navy Gideon Welles, a close confidant of Secretary of

WarEdwin Stanton (the other key conspirator in the plot to assassinate not onlyLincoln, butVice President Andrew Johnson and Secretary of State William H. Seward).

In his dying declaration, confirmed by his diary, assassin John WilkesBooth named Stantonas the person who hired him. Booth said he was promised $8,500.00to assassinate Lincoln,Johnson and Seward. According to Booth's diary, found on hispartially burned body as the dying assassin was dragged from the tobacco shed on RichardGarrett's farm where he and his accomplice, David Herold made their last stand. The officerwho searched Booth's body wasLt. Col. Everton Conger. Conger who denied doing soto Stanton, read the diary before surrendering it to Stanton. Congerlater testified in courtthat 20 pages of the diarythose pages detailing the plans of the multiple assassination plot,and Stanton's role in the plothad been torn from the journal by someone after he

surrendered the diary to Stanton. (Also included in the National Archive were voluminousnotes in the handwriting ofCol. (and laterGeneral) Lafayette C. Baker, who served as thecollection head of the IRS when it was created in 1862, and as the surrogate head of theSecret Service. Baker, who feared that Secretary of WarEdwin Stanton was behind twoattempts on his life after PresidentAndrew Johnson escapedimpeachment, Bakerdetailed what he knew about the assassination plot, andincluded on his list the names of 11 Congressmen, 11 Senators, 11 industrialists,11 bankers and several other influential men in government and business whowanted the nation restored. Bakerclaimed all of them were in on, or hadknowledge of, the plot to seize the government of the United States,with Stanton designated as the man who would replace Lincoln as the

President. Most of the documents, which remain in the National Archive wereuncovered by paralegalRoy Benson and M.J. "Red" Beckman in 1985 whenthey were researching the legality of the 16th and 17th Amendments. Logged as being part ofthe Bakerevidence file to the National Archive, but missing, were the pages identifying, byname, those complicit in the assassination of Lincoln whose names were known by Baker.Because ofBaker's association with Stanton, President Johnson fired him. Bakerdied onJuly 3, 1968, supposedly from meningitis. Years later scientific testing ofBaker's hair foliclesverified that he died from arsenic poisoning.

Bakerwas deeply implicated in the plot to kill Lincoln, Johnson and Seward. Baker(acivilian politician who received his military rank directly from Secretary ofWarStanton. Bakerserved a dual role for the Jacobins. He was the chief of the presidential

protection squad of the Secret Service when it replaced the Pinkerton DetectiveAgencyas Lincoln's bodyguards.

The Secret Service maintained "holding cells" in the basement of the US Treasury Buildingwhere they detained suspected southern sympathizers or those deemed to be northern taxdodgers, who were beaten until they revealed where they had hidden whatever money orcontraband the IRS insisted they possessed. All such contrabandeven if it was the lawfullife savings of the IRS' victimwas seized as contraband by the military. There was no dueprocess throughout the entire Civil War and, in the South, virtually none until Rutherford B.
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


13/17

Hayes became the President of the United States. The Bill of Rights was simply suspendeddue to Lincoln's "national emergency."

As Lincoln scrambled to finance his war to force South Carolina back intothe Union in 1861, the last Jacobin he consulted on the legality of theincome tax was US Attorney GeneralEdward Bates. Unlike the FreeSoilers and Masons that swarmed into the newly formed Republican Party

in 1854, Bates was a quiet, private unregenerated Whig. He had a good,clear legal mind and was respected by his peers in the legalcommunity. Bates' role in theLincoln Administration was one of simplygiving legal advise to the President (a role now played by the SolicitorGeneral). While the current role of the US Attorney General was that ofchief cop for the nation, in the Jacobin Lincoln Administration, he wasthe legal adviser of the Chief of State. Bates was never part of theconspiracy to assassinate Lincoln, Johnsonand Seward, or the plot tooverthrow the American Republic. The plot failed because GeorgeAtzeridt, who was supposed to shoot Vice President Andrew Johnson at10:15 p.m. would also have had to kill his wife, who was with her husband

at the time. Atzeridt, who had no problem with killing a man, drew the lineat killing women. For that reason, Atzeridt did not keep his 10:15 p.m.appointment to kill Johnson. and destroyed Stanton's line of ascension to the presidency.

A third person, Lewis Thorton Powell [aka Lewis Paine], was hired to kill Seward at 10:15p.m. that night. Powell and David Herold arrived to Seward's home shortly after 10 pm.,telling Seward's butler that he was bringing medicine to Secretary Seward from hisphysician, Dr. Tullio Verdi. When the butler refused to let the two men in, Herold grabbed thebutler and Powell rushed up the stairs where he was stopped by Seward'sson, Frederick. Powell hit him so hard with his revolver that it fractured Frederick Seward'sskull in two places. At that moment, the bodyguard appeared.Powell slashed his stomachopen with a bowie knife, and then proceeded into Seward's bedroom where he repeatedlystabbed the ailing cabinet official. Thinking he had killed Seward, Powell and Herold fled butwere caught on April 30. The trial for the Lincoln assassination conspirators: Samuel

Arnold, George Atzerodt,David Herold, Michael O'Laughlin, LewisPowell, Edmund Spangler,Mary Surratt, and if you recall, the only innocent"conspirator," Dr. Samuel Mudd who treated John WilkesBooth for a gunshotwound received while escaping from Ford'sTheater.Mudd, O'Laughlin, SpanglerandArnold escaped the hangman byone vote. All of the other defendants were hung on July 7, 1865 at WashingtonPenitentiary.
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


14/17

Lincoln's Postmaster General, Joseph Holt, a Democrat Jacobin, attempted to enter falseevidence at the trial that the plot to kill Lincoln was hatched by Gen. Robert E. Lee with thehelp of Ohio Democratic Copperhead Congressman ClementVallandigham whom Lincoln had arrested at his Dayton, Ohio home at 2:30 a.m. on May 4,1963 without a warrant for violating Lincoln'sGeneral Order 38having sympathy for theenemy in a speech Vallandigham made on the floor of Congress. Because Lincoln knew

that no member of Congress would support his war effort if he arrested a sittingCongressman, the Ohio Jacobin Republicans redrew the boundariesofVallandigham congressional district making it a Republican instead of a Democraticdistrict. The GOP pitted a Republican war hero, Robert Schenck,against VallandighamSchenck won by 1,250 votes. Lincoln orderedhis arrest. Vallandigham was thrown into a military prison in Cincinnati.He was tried and sentenced to a federal prison until the end of thewar. Lincoln commuted his sentence to deportation to the Confederacy.In June, 1863 Vallandigham moved to Canada. In early 1864 he quietlyreturned to Ohio where he formed The Sons of Liberty.

Here's the problem with the Vallandigham case. Revisionist historians

claim he was legally arrested, by warrant, on May 5, 1863, tried forsedition and found guilty. The historic records researched by Dr.Thomas J. DiLorenzo, Professor of Economics at theSellinger Schoolof Business and Managementat Loyola College in Maryland finds therewas no trial. Edgar Lee Masters, Clarence Darrow's former lawpartner said revisionists created the "trial" so as not to sully the memoryof America's first dictator, making him look like a benevolent dictator forparoling Vallandigham instead of confining him in prison.

As Lincoln violated every federal law on the books, and almost every article and clause ofthe Constitution of the United States, not one federal judge anywhere in the Union Statesstepped up to challenge the Jacobin abuses. Protecting their jobs and their skins was

far more important to judges with lifetime appointments than protecting the citizens ofthe United States and the sanctity of its Constitution.

You just received a major primer in American History that I expect less than 1% or 2% of theAmerican people knew before they read this piece. Perhaps a few handfuls of Americansheard some of this from grandma or grandpabut didn't really believe it because...well, whatdid Grandma know in that one room school house she went to before school houses hadmore than one or two classrooms and flush toilets?

If you read this article deeply enough and paid close enough attention to the players youwould have noticed that whether we were talking about politicians, educators, economists orthe princes of industry and the barons of banking and business, or whether the topics dealt

with the Executive or Legislative branches of government, we are left with the fact that whenthe Founding Fathers set up the divisions of government, they set up two branches ofgovernment that would forever be a thorn in the side of the peoplethe Executive andLegislative branches of government. To counter them, the Founding Fathers established aseries of courts whose role was make sure the rule of law in the United States would foreverremain fair and without bias. That's why Lady Justice is blindfolded.

The laws of the United States of America have to apply equally to all Americansor none ofthem. No American is more, or less equal, that any other American. If one American can bringhis religious prayer book into a public building, that every American has the same right. And,
http://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.htmlhttp://www.jonchristianryter.com/2010/101225.html


15/17

while the event I am about to describe actually happened in England, this is a recurring dailytheological nightmare in the United States. Only in England, it is happening solely out of fearof Islamics. Lawmakers and jurists simply created a legal subterfuge to justify governmentbigotry.

Two British women, Nadia Eweida and Shirley Chaplin are headed to court to argue thattheir rights under Article 9 of the European Union Convention on Human Rights have been

violated. Lawyers for the two women insist their right to wear a crucifix is covered underArticle 9 as a "manifestation" of religious expression. The British Foreign Office published thefollowing statement in the London Telegraph"...In neither case is there any suggestion thatthe wearing of a visible crucifix is generally [recognized] as a form of [practicing] the Christianfaith, still less one that is regarded (including by the applicants themselves) as a requirementof the faith."

According to both the Telegraph and the BBC, the ministers from each woman's church wasprepared to tell the court that wearing crucifixes are not required religious doctrine, supportingthe position of the employers that the employees could not be compelled by their churches towear religious symbols as a church requirementlike Muslim burkas and hijabs. UnderBritish law, religious libertyand who possesses itis determined by the government whichcontrols the retractable rights of the people. Now it is up to the European Court of HumanRights to determine if wearing a Christian symbol is a "right" possessed by Eweida (an airlineattendant) and Chaplin (a nurse) under Article 9. Andrew Brown, a blogger for theliberal Guardian, asked: "Does Christianity demand that its adherents wear a cross? Thecourts have decided it doesn't. You might as well as, 'Does Christianity demand that you go tochurch on Sunday? There are just too many Christians for such a question to make sense.'"

I know. You're an American, so it doesn't concern you. Today, that is. But, by next month, ornext year, it will. If three remaining members of the US Supreme Court who attended thecoupling international law with national law a couple of years ago have their way, andadding Obama's social justice groupies: Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor, that legal

precedent, coupled with our already partially erased religious freedoms will concern yougreatly. But, your concerns then will be "too little, too late."

Article 9 of the European Union which covers freedom of thought, conscience and religion isthe UN's abridged version of the 1st Amendment's freedom of speech and freedom of religion.While freedom of speech and freedom of religion under the US Constitution are inherentrights that come from God, in the European Union, the "...freedom to manifest one'sreligion or beliefsshall be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by lawandare necessary in a democratic society in the interests of public safety, for the protection of

public order, health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of othe

Save America -JCRyter

Documents

Transcript of Save America -JCRyter