SARC Report for Alpha Cindy Avitia High€¦ · Filipino 1.38 % Hispanic or Latino 82.00 % Native...

Alpha Cindy Avitia High

By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC).The SARC contains information aboutthe condit ion and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educat ional agencies (LEAs) are required toprepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, w ith specific act ivit ies toaddress state and local priorit ies. Addit ionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent w ith data reported in the SARC.

For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Educat ion (CDE) SARC web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.

For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/.

For addit ional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office.

DataQuest

Internet Access

School Accountability Report CardReported Using Data from the 2018—19 School Year

California Department of Education

DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest web page at https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains addit ional information about thisschool and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., testdata, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners).

Internet access is available at public libraries and other locat ions that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at librariesand public locat ions is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrict ions may include the hours of operat ion, the length of t ime that aworkstat ion may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstat ion, and the ability to print documents.

Jorge ArellanoPrincipal, Alpha Cindy Avitia High

Alpha: Cindy Avit ia High School is a small, safe and tuit ion-free community school that opened its doors to its first class of9th graders in the summer of 2015. Led by Principal Jorge Arellano and a team of dedicated and skilled teachers, Alpha:Cindy Avit ia prepares all students for college w ith the knowledge, skills, and self-discipline needed to succeed. Further,Alpha also supports families through every step of the college process to ensure students successfully apply to, enroll, andsucceed throughout college. We are honored to name Alpha’s first high school in honor of Alpha’s first board president, Cindy Avit ia. Born and raised inEast San Jose, Cindy served her community as an act ivist across many issues, a social and civil rights advocate, and animmigrat ion attorney. Alpha is honored to memorialize Cindy, her commitment to empowering her community, and thespirit of service she embodied.

Alpha Cindy Avit ia High1881 Cunningham Ave.San Jose, CA 95122-2314

Phone: 408-791-1558Email: [email protected]

About Our SchoolAbout Our School

ContactContact

https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/https://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/https://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/mailto:[email protected]

Last updated: 1/24/2020


About This SchoolContact Information (School Year 2019—20)

School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2019—20)

District Contact Information (School Year 2019—20)

District Name East Side Union High

Phone Number (408) 791-1558

Superintendent Chris Funk

Email Address [email protected]

Website www.esuhsd.org

School Contact Information (School Year 2019—20)

School Name Alpha Cindy Avit ia High

Street 1881 Cunningham Ave.

City, State, Zip San Jose, Ca, 95122-2314

Phone Number 408-791-1558

Principal Jorge Arellano

Email Address [email protected]

Website www.alphapublicschools.org

County-District-School(CDS) Code

43694270132274

Alpha: Cindy Avit ia High School is a small, safe and tuit ion-free community school that opened its doors to its first class of 9th graders in the summer of 2015. Ledby Principal Jorge Arellano and a team of dedicated and skilled teachers, Alpha: Cindy Avit ia prepares all students for college w ith the knowledge, skills, and self-discipline needed to succeed. Further, Alpha also supports families through every step of the college process to ensure students successfully apply to, enroll, andsucceed throughout college. We are honored to name Alpha’s first high school in honor of Alpha’s first board president, Cindy Avit ia. Born and raised in East SanJose, Cindy served her community as an act ivist across many issues, a social and civil rights advocate, and an immigrat ion attorney. Alpha is honored to memorializeCindy, her commitment to empowering her community, and the spirit of service she embodied.The mission of Alpha Cindy Avit ia High School is to provide children from high-poverty communit ies an educat ion that effect ively develops the academic skills andcompetencies of character to overcome the achievement gap, graduate from college, and become self-reliant and product ive leaders. Alpha Cindy Avit ia HighSchool w ill eliminate the achievement gap by inspiring thousands of children from tradit ionally underserved communit ies to become self-motivated, competent,and lifelong learners who graduate from college and serve as leaders and role models for their families and communit ies.

2018-19 SARC - Alpha Cindy Avitia High

Page 2 of 21

mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2018—19)

Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2018—19)

Grade Level Number of Students

Grade 9 150

Grade 10 117

Grade 11 80

Grade 12 88

Total Enrollment 435

Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 120

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

Student Group Percent of Total Enrollment

Black or African American 0.69 %

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive 0.23 %

Asian 7.00 %

Filipino 1.38 %

Hispanic or Lat ino 82.00 %

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.00 %

White 8.00 %

Two or More Races 0.23 %

Student Group (Other) Percent of Total Enrollment

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 88.00 %

English Learners 32.00 %

Students w ith Disabilit ies 14.00 %

Foster Youth 0.20 %

Homeless 0.00 %


Page 3 of 21



A. Conditions of Learning

State Priority: Basic

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1):

Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credent ialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching;Pupils have access to standards-aligned instruct ional materials; andSchool facilit ies are maintained in good repair

Teacher Credentials

Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions

Note: “Misassignments” refers to the number of posit ions filled by teachers who lack legal authorizat ion to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners.

Teachers

School2017—18

School2018—19

School2019—20

District2019—

20

With Full Credent ial 10 8 12

Without Full Credent ial 11 12 7

Teachers Teaching Outside SubjectArea of Competence (w ith fullcredent ial)

2 0 0

0.0 1.0 2.00

2

4

6

8

10

12

14Teachers with Full Credential

Teachers without Full Credential

Teachers Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence

Indicator2017—

182018—

192019—

20

Misassignments of Teachers of EnglishLearners

3 1

Total Teacher Misassignments* 3 1

Vacant Teacher Posit ions 0 1

2017—18 2018—19 2019—200.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners

Total Teacher Misassignments*

Vacant Teacher Positions


Page 4 of 21


Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials (School Year 2019—20)Year and month in which the data were collected: July 2019

Note: Cells w ith N/A values do not require data.

SubjectTextbooks and Other Instructional Materials/year of

AdoptionFrom Most Recent

Adoption?Percent Students Lacking Own

Assigned Copy

Reading/Language ArtsStudySync

Yes 0.00 %

MathematicsIllustrat ive Math

Yes 0.00 %

ScienceInspire

Yes 0.00 %

History-Social ScienceHistory Alive!, America's History

Yes 0.00 %

Foreign LanguageDescubre, Temas Spanish Language

Yes 100.00 %

Health 0.00 %

Visual and Performing Arts 0.0 %

Science Lab Eqpmt (Grades9-12)

N/A N/A 0.0 %


Page 5 of 21



School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements

School Facility Good Repair StatusYear and month of the most recent FIT report: June 2019

Overall Facility RateYear and month of the most recent FIT report: June 2019

School is in decent condit ion needed some upgrade is our electrical work

System Inspected Rating Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned

Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Good

Interior: Interior Surfaces Good

Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/Vermin Infestat ion Good

Electrical: Electrical Good

Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/Fountains Good

Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Good

Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs Good

External: Playground/School Grounds, W indows/Doors/Gates/Fences Good

Overall Rat ing Good


Page 6 of 21


B. Pupil Outcomes

State Priority: Pupil Achievement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4):

Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced SummativeAssessments for students in the general educat ion populat ion and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] andmathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may part icipate in the administrat ion of the CAAs. CAAs items arealigned w ith alternate achievement standards, which are linked w ith the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students w ith the most significant cognit ivedisabilit ies); and

The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that sat isfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the CaliforniaState University, or career technical educat ion sequences or programs of study.

CAASPP Test Results in ELA and Mathematics for All StudentsGrades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven Percentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standard

Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: ELA and Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The "Percent Met or Exceeded" is calculated by taking thetotal number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard(i.e., achieved Level 3-Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.

SubjectSchool

2017—18School

2018—19District

2017—18District

2018—19State

2017—18State

2018—19

English Language Arts / Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) 67.03% 57.89% 61.29% 62.25% 50.0% 50.0%

Mathematics (grades 3-8 and 11) 48.89% 36.84% 39.96% 41.75% 38.0% 39.0%


Page 7 of 21


CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2018—19)

Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the total number ofstudents who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achievedLevel 3–Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: The number of students tested includes all students who part icipated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students testedis not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who receivedscores.

Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Not Tested Percent Met or Exceeded

All Students 78 75 97% 3% 57.89%

Male 43 40 93.02% 6.98% 52.50%

Female 37 36 97.30% 2.70% 63.89%

Black or African American

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive

Asian 6 6 100% 0%

Filipino 1 1 100% 0%

Hispanic or Lat ino 69 66 95.60% 4.40% 59.09%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1 1 100% 0%

White 1 1 100% 0%

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 73 70 95.89% 4.11% 69.05%

English Learners 31 29 97% 3% 21.10%

Students w ith Disabilit ies 7 6 86% 14%

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services

Foster Youth -- -- -- --

Homeless


Page 8 of 21


CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student GroupGrades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2018—19)

Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The “Percent Met or Exceeded” is calculated by taking the totalnumber of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e.,achieved Level 3–Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who part icipated in both assessments.

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small forstat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

Note: The number of students tested includes all students who part icipated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students testedis not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who receivedscores.

Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Not Tested Percent Met or Exceeded

All Students 79 76 97% 3% 36.84%

Male 43 40 93.02% 6.98% 42.50%

Female 37 36 97.30% 2.70% 30.56%

Black or African American

American Indian or Alaska Nat ive

Asian 6 6 100% 0%

Filipino 1 1 100% 0%

Hispanic or Lat ino 69 66 95.60% 4.40% 39.40%

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 1 1 100% 0%

White 1 1 100% 0%

Two or More Races

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 74 71 96% 4% 40.47%

English Learners 32 30 94% 6% 15.80%

Students w ith Disabilit ies 7 6 86% 14%

Students Receiving Migrant Educat ion Services

Foster Youth -- -- -- --

Homeless


Page 9 of 21



CAASPP Test Results in Science for All StudentsGrades Five, Eight and High SchoolPercentage of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standard


Note: This is a placeholder for the California Science Test (CAST) which was administered operat ionally during the 2018–19 school year. However, these data are notavailable for inclusion in the 2018–19 SARC post ing due February 1, 2020. These data w ill be included in the 2019–20 SARC post ing due February 1, 2021.

Career Technical Education (CTE) Participation (School Year 2018—19)

Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) Admission

SubjectSchool

2017—18School

2018—19District

2017—18District

2018—19State

2017—18State

2018—19

Science (grades 5, 8, and high school) N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Measure CTE Program Participation

Number of Pupils Part icipat ing in CTE

Percent of Pupils that Complete a CTE Program and Earn a High School Diploma --

Percent of CTE Courses that are Sequenced or Art iculated Between the School and Inst itut ions of Postsecondary Educat ion --

UC/CSU Course Measure Percent

2018—19 Pupils Enrolled in Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission 100.00%

2017—18 Graduates Who Completed All Courses Required for UC/CSU Admission --


Page 10 of 21



State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8):

Pupil outcomes in the subject area of physical educat ion

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2018—19)

Note: Percentages are not calculated and double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number ofstudents in this category is too small for stat ist ical accuracy or to protect student privacy.

GradeLevel

Percentage of Students Meeting Four of SixFitness Standards

Percentage of Students Meeting Five of SixFitness Standards

Percentage of Students Meeting Six of SixFitness Standards

9 31.00% 8.00% 55.00%


Page 11 of 21


C. Engagement

State Priority: Parental Involvement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3):

Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each school site

Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2019—20)

State Priority: Pupil Engagement

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Engagement (Priority 5):

High school dropout rates; andHigh school graduat ion rates

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)

At CAHS, family involvement is an important component of our success as a school. In addit ion to the school site council, families are involved in a w ide variety ofways, including: Parent conferences, Volunteer opportunit ies: Bi-monthly community meetings include parent educat ion topics such as college applicat ion process,bullying, and helping w ith student work; Monthly coffee/cafecitos w ith school leaders are opportunit ies for families to discuss a range of topics in support of theirchildren. Online parent portal for families to access student attendance and grades in real-t ime; A parent mobile applicat ion that contains a range of relevantinformation and resources, including calendar, announcements, connect ions to the parent portal, and handbooks. Regular phone calls by teacher advisors to theirstudents; Family conferences three t imes a year that are student-led; Family survey two t imes a year; Alpha Board meetings are open to the public, and parentsare encouraged to attend. In addit ion, CAHS has a Parent Learning Center, managed by our Parent Learning Center Manager, that ident ifies and facilitates variousinit iat ives to support our family community and help minimize the barriers that families face in support ing their students

IndicatorSchool

2015—16District

2015—16State

2015—16

Dropout Rate -- 10.00% 9.70%

Graduat ion Rate -- 85.00% 83.80%

IndicatorSchool

2016—17School

2017—18District

2016—17District

2017—18State

2016—17State

2017—18

Dropout Rate 4.00% 1.00% 20.50% 17.80% 9.10% 9.60%

Graduat ion Rate -- -- 71.50% 75.70% 82.70% 83.00%

Dropout/Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate) Chart

2015—16 2016—17 2017—180.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5Dropout Rate

Graduation Rate


Page 12 of 21


For the formula to calculate the 2016–17 and 2017–18 adjusted cohort graduat ion rate, see the 2018–19 Data Element Definit ions document located on the SARC webpage at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/.


Page 13 of 21

https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/


State Priority: School Climate

The SARC provides the follow ing information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6):

Pupil suspension rates;Pupil expulsion rates; andOther local measures on the sense of safety

Suspensions and Expulsions

RateSchool

2016—17School

2017—18School

2018—19District

2016—17District

2017—18District

2018—19State

2016—17State

2017—18State

2018—19

Suspensions 1.90% 3.40% 7.70% 4.20% 3.90% 3.40% 3.60% 3.50% 3.50%

Expulsions 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.10% 0.10% 0.00% 0.10% 0.10% 0.10%


Page 14 of 21


D. Other SARC InformationThe information in this sect ion is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorit ies for LCFF.

* Number of classes indicates how many classes fall into each size category (a range of total students per class). ** "Other" category is for mult i-grade level classes.

Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) School Year (2016—17)

Grade Level Average Class SizeNumber of Classes *

1-20Number of Classes *


33+

K

1

2

3

4

5

6

Other**






33+

K

1

2

3

4

5

6

Other**






33+

K

1

2

3

4

5

6

Other**


Page 15 of 21

Last updated: 1/24/20202018-19 SARC - Alpha Cindy Avitia High

Page 16 of 21


Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) (School Year 2016—17)

* Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information isreported by subject area rather than grade level.

Subject Average Class SizeNumber of Classes *



33+

English 31.00 1 3 6

Mathematics 27.00 2 2 1

Science 29.00 1 6 2

Social Science 26.00 3 7






33+

English 27.00 5 7 3


Science 25.00 4 4 1

Social Science 30.00 1 9 3






33+

English 30.00 0 4 0


Science 30.00 0 4 0

Social Science 30.00 0 4 0


Page 17 of 21



Ratio of Academic Counselors to Pupils (School Year 2018—19)

*One Full T ime Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full t ime; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full t ime.**Average Number of Pupils per Counselor

Student Support Services Staff (School Year 2018—19)

*One Full T ime Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full t ime; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full t ime.

Title Ratio**

Counselors* 1

Title Number of FTE* Assigned to School

Counselor (Academic, Social/Behavioral or Career Development) 2.00

Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0.00

Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) 0.00

Psychologist 0.60

Social Worker 0.00

Nurse 0.00

Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist 0.10

Resource Specialist (non-teaching) 0.00

Other 1.00


Page 18 of 21


Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2017—18)


Level Total Expenditures Per PupilExpenditures Per Pupil

(Restricted)Expenditures Per Pupil

(Unrestricted) Average Teacher Salary

School Site $12021.00 $2477.00 $9543.00 $58750.00

District N/A N/A -- $88797.00

Percent Difference – School Site and District N/A N/A -- --

State N/A N/A $7506.64 $88538.00

Percent Difference – School Site and State N/A N/A -- --


Page 19 of 21


Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2017—18)

For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Cert ificated Salaries & Benefits web page at https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/ .

Category District Amount State Average For Districts In Same Category

Beginning Teacher Salary $55,349 $52,466

Mid-Range Teacher Salary $90,881 $87,373

Highest Teacher Salary $112,154 $109,803

Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $ --

Average Principal Salary (Middle) $ $142,025

Average Principal Salary (High) $146,855 $153,904

Superintendent Salary $286,275 $241,221

Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 34.00% 33.00%

Percent of Budget for Administrat ive Salaries 3.00% 5.00%

Teacher Salary Chart

Beginning Teacher Salary Mid-Range Teacher Salary Highest Teacher Salary0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

Principal Salary Chart

Average Principal Salary

(Elementary)


(Middle)


(High)

0

25000

50000

75000

100000

125000

150000


Page 20 of 21

https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/



Advanced Placement (AP) Courses (School Year 2018—19)


*Where there are student course enrollments of at least one student.

Professional Development

Subject Number of AP Courses Offered* Percent of Students In AP Courses

Computer Science 0 N/A

English 1 N/A

Fine and Performing Arts 0 N/A

Foreign Language 1 N/A

Mathematics 1 N/A

Science 1 N/A

Social Science 2 N/A

All Courses 6 40.00%

Measure 2017—18 2018—19 2019—20

Number of school days dedicated to Staff Development and Continuous Improvement 45 45 40


Page 21 of 21

Alpha Cindy Avitia HighSchool Accountability Report CardReported Using Data from the 2018—19 School YearDataQuestInternet AccessJorge ArellanoAbout Our SchoolContact

About This SchoolContact Information (School Year 2019—20)School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2019—20)Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2018—19)Student Enrollment by Student Group (School Year 2018—19)

A. Conditions of LearningState Priority: BasicTeacher CredentialsTeacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher PositionsQuality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Other Instructional Materials (School Year 2019—20)School Facility Conditions and Planned ImprovementsSchool Facility Good Repair StatusOverall Facility Rate

B. Pupil OutcomesState Priority: Pupil AchievementCareer Technical Education (CTE) Participation (School Year 2018—19)Courses for University of California (UC) and/or California State University (CSU) AdmissionState Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes

California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2018—19)

C. EngagementState Priority: Parental InvolvementOpportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2019—20)State Priority: Pupil Engagement

Dropout Rate and Graduation Rate (Four-Year Cohort Rate)State Priority: School Climate

Suspensions and Expulsions

D. Other SARC InformationAverage Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) School Year (2016—17)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) School Year (2017—18)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) School Year (2018—19)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) (School Year 2016—17)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) (School Year 2017—18)Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) (School Year 2018—19)Ratio of Academic Counselors to Pupils (School Year 2018—19)Student Support Services Staff (School Year 2018—19)Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2017—18)Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2017—18)Advanced Placement (AP) Courses (School Year 2018—19)Professional Development

SARC Report for Alpha Cindy Avitia High€¦ · Filipino 1.38 % Hispanic or Latino 82.00 % Native...

Documents

Transcript of SARC Report for Alpha Cindy Avitia High€¦ · Filipino 1.38 % Hispanic or Latino 82.00 % Native...