San Francisco Voter Survey Results April 2011

8/6/2019 San Francisco Voter Survey Results April 2011

1/25

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATESAPRIL 26-28, 2011

Time Began___________________Time Finished_________________ Total Time_______

SAN FRANCISCO VOTER SURVEY

220-3168WTN=611

Hello, I'm ________ from FM3, a public opinion research company. We'reconducting a survey about issues that concern people in San Francisco. I am nottrying to sell you anything and will not ask for a donation of any kind. May Iplease speak with _________? (MUST SPEAK WITH VOTER LISTED. VERIFYTHAT THE VOTER LIVES AT THE ADDRESS LISTED--OTHERWISETERMINATE)

(IF VOTER WISHES TO COMPLETE THE INTERVIEW IN CHINESE, PLEASEHAND OFF TO BILINGUAL INTERVIEWER)

1. Before we begin, I need to know if I have reached you on a cell phone. (IFYES, ASK:) Are you in a place where you can talk safely?

Yes, cell and in safe place------------------------23%Yes, cell not in safe place-------------TERMINATENo, not on cell----------------------------------------77%(DONT READ) DK/NA/REFUSED- -TERMINATE

2. Sometimes things come up and people are not able to vote. In November,there will be a city election for Mayor and other city offices. How likely areyou to vote in this local election? Will you definitely vote, probably vote,are the chances 50-50 that you will vote, will you probably not vote or willyou definitely not vote?

Definitely vote 89%Probably vote 11%50-50 0%Probably not vote TERMINATE

Definitely not vote------TERMINATE

(DONT READ) DK/NATERMINATE

3. (T) Next, do you feel things in the City of San Francisco are generally goingin the right direction or do you feel things have gotten pretty seriously offon the wrong track?

Right direction-----------------------54%Wrong track--------------------------28%(DON'T READ) DK/NA-----------18%


2/25

FAIRBANK, MASLIN, MAULLIN, METZ & ASSOCIATES 220-3168-WTPAGE 2

NEXT, I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT A MEASURE THAT MAY APPEARON A FUTURE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO BALLOT.

4. This measure might be entitled: SAN FRANCISCO ROAD REPAIR AND SAFETYIMPROVEMENT BONDS. It may read as follows:

To fix potholes and repave deteriorating streets and reconstruct sidewalksin neighborhoods throughout San Francisco; improve safety for pedestriansand bicyclists; improve MUNI reliability and traffic flow on local streets andintersections; repair and improve the safety of deteriorating bridges andstaircases; and improve disabled access to sidewalks; shall San Franciscoissue 248 million dollars in general obligation bonds, subject to independentoversight and regular audits?

If the election were held today, would you vote yes in favor of the bondmeasure or no to oppose it? (IF YES/NO, ASK:) Will you definitely vote

(YES/NO) or just probably? (IF UNDECIDED, ASK: Are you leaningtoward voting yes or no?)

TOTAL YES-------------------------------------66%Definitely yes-------------------------(ASK Q5)--34%Probably yes--------------------------(ASK Q5)--21%Undecided, lean yes----------------(ASK Q5)--11%

TOTAL NO--------------------------------------26%Undecided, lean no-------------------(ASK Q5)--5%Probably no-----------------------------(ASK Q5)--7%

Definitely no--------------------------(ASK Q5)--14%

(DON'T READ) DK/NA--------(SKIP TO Q6)--9%


3/25


(ASK 5 ONLY IF YES/NO IN Q4)5. In a few words of your own, why would you voteYES/NO on this measure?

(OPEN END, RECORD VERBATIM RESPONSE BELOW)

a. Yes:

Fix roads/potholes--------------------------------------------------------------------53%General positive/needed------------------------------------------------------------18%Maintain infrastructure--------------------------------------------------------------10%Good for the City------------------------------------------------------------------------7%Safety---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6%Bicyclists/pedestrians-----------------------------------------------------------------5%Disabled access-------------------------------------------------------------------------4%MUNI----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3%Create jobs--------------------------------------------------------------------------------3%

Cost concerns----------------------------------------------------------------------------3%Approve funding method/good use of funds-----------------------------------2%Bridges-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1%Sidewalks----------------------------------------------------------------------------------1%Traffic---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1%Need more information---------------------------------------------------------------1%Other----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1%

DK/NA/Refused--------------------------------------------------------------------------1%

b. No:

Mismanagement of funds/have enough money-----------------------------31%Against tax increase/bond measure--------------------------------------------30%Too much money/can't afford it--------------------------------------------------23%Other issues are more important------------------------------------------------15%Not needed/roads are fine-----------------------------------------------------------5%Need more information---------------------------------------------------------------4%Other----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4%


4/25


(ASK Q6 IF CODES 2-7 IN Q4)6. Suppose this road repair and safety improvement measure were for

_____________(READ EACH, RECORD) instead of 248 million dollars? Inthat case, would you vote yes in favor of it or no to oppose it? (IF YES/NOASK): "Is that definitely (YES/NO) or just probably (YES/NO)?" (IFUNDECIDED, ASK: Well, do you lean towards voting yes or no?)

DEF PROB LEAN LEAN PROB DEF (DK/YES YES YES NO NO NO NA)

a. 200 million dollars 40%----16%------10%-----4%-------5%------15%-------9%b. 150 million dollars 43%-- -15%------10%-----3%-------5%------15%-------7%

(RESUME ASKING ALL RESPONDENTS)

NOW I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU ABOUT ANOTHER MEASURE THAT MAYAPPEAR ON THE SAME SAN FRANCISCO BALLOT.

7. This measure might be entitled: SAN FRANCISCO EDUCATION BONDS. Itmay read as follows:

Shall the San Francisco Unified School District modernize, repair andseismically upgrade additional school facilities to health, safety,instructional and accessibility standards, and where applicable, replaceportable trailers with permanent classrooms; upgrade bathrooms, sciencelabs, plumbing, electrical and other building systems; replace heating andventilation systems; and renovate classrooms, with proceeds from theissuance of up to 531 million dollars in bonds, at legal interest rates, withguaranteed annual audits, and citizens' oversight to monitor expenditures?

If the election were held today, would you vote yes in favor of the bondmeasure or no to oppose it? (IF YES/NO, ASK:) Will you definitely vote(YES/NO) or just probably? (IF UNDECIDED, ASK: Are you leaningtoward voting yes or no?)

TOTAL YES-------------------------------------67%Definitely yes-----------------------------------------36%Probably yes------------------------------------------21%Undecided, lean yes----------------------------------9%

TOTAL NO--------------------------------------26%Undecided, lean no-----------------------------------3%Probably no---------------------------------------------5%Definitely no-------------------------------------------18%

(DON'T READ) DK/NA-------------------------------7%


5/25


8. Now suppose that both of the bond measures I just asked you about wereon the ballot at the same time. Do you think that you would (ROTATE) [ ]vote yes on both measures, [ ] vote yes on only one of the two measures, or[ ] vote no on both measures?

Yes on both (SKIP TO Q10)--47%Yes on one (ASK Q9)--27%No on both---------------------(SKIP TO Q10)--17%

(DON'T READ) DK/NA (SKIP TO Q10)--9%

(ASK Q9 ONLY IF CODE 2 IN Q8)9. Which one of the two measures do you think you would support? (ONLY IF

REQUESTED, READ AND ROTATE)

[ ] The 248 million dollar road repair and safetyimprovement bond measure---------------------------49%

OR

[ ] The 531 million dollar education bond measure48%

(DONT KNOW/NA) 3%


NOW I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU SOME GENERAL QUESTIONSABOUT LOCAL GOVERNMENT.

10. First, Im going to read you a list of issues that some people say may beproblems in San Francisco. After I read each one, please tell me if you thinkit is an extremely serious problem, a very serious problem, a somewhatserious problem, or not a serious problem in San Francisco. (RANDOMIZE)

NOTEXT. VERY S.W. A (DK/

SER. SER. SER. PROB.NA)

[ ]a. The reliability of public transportation15%----------------------------------------------28%

26%----------------------------------------------24%6%

[ ]b. Air pollution and smog----------------------7%21%----------------------------------------------29%41%-----------------------------------------------1%

[ ]c. Traffic congestion---------------------------12%35%----------------------------------------------33%17%-----------------------------------------------3%

[ ]d. Global warming------------------------------16%26%----------------------------------------------24%27%-----------------------------------------------7%


6/25


[ ]e. The amount of money people have topay in local taxes------------------------------------17%

26%----------------------------------------------28%25%-----------------------------------------------4%

[ ]f. Waste and inefficiency in citygovernment-------------------------------------------29%

31%----------------------------------------------24%7%-------------------------------------------------9%[ ]g. The quality of public schools------------25%

38%----------------------------------------------21%5%-----------------------------------------------12%

[ ]h. Deteriorating local streets and roads-27%35%----------------------------------------------29%8%-------------------------------------------------1%

[ ]i. Unemployment------------------------------28%41%----------------------------------------------23%3%-------------------------------------------------4%

[ ]j. Injuries to pedestrians from car traffic13%----------------------------------------------31%32%----------------------------------------------18%6%


7/25


11. Next, I am going to read you a list of specific services San Francisco Cityand County government provides to residents. After I read each one,please tell me whether you think the City is doing an excellent, pretty good,only fair, or poor job of providing that service. (RANDOMIZE)

(DONT

PRETTY ONLY READ)EXC. GOODFAIR

POORDK/NA

[ ]a. (T) Maintaining Citystreets and roads-------------3%

21%----------------------46%27%-----------------------2%

(SPLIT SAMPLE A ONLY)

[ ]b. (T) Managing SanFranciscos budget andfinances--------------------------2%

16%----------------------42%29%----------------------11%

[ ]c. (T) Maintaining Citybuildings and facilities ------5%

40%----------------------40%6%-------------------------8%

[ ]d. Providing landscaping,trees, bike lanes, wider

sidewalks and other elementsthat enhance City streets-11%

42%----------------------39%5%-------------------------3%

(SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY)[ ]e. (T) Creating jobs andencouraging economicdevelopment--------------------3%

24%----------------------45%18%----------------------10%

[ ]f. (T) Ensuring publicsafety-----------------------------3%

47%----------------------39%6%------------------------4%

[ ]g. (T) Maintaining Cityparks and recreation facilities

7%-----------------------46%36%-----------------------7%4%



8/25


12. Next, would you describe the streets and sidewalks in San Francisco asgenerally safe or unsafe for ________? (IF SAFE/UNSAFE, ASK:) Is thatvery SAFE/UNSAFE, or just somewhat? (RANDOMIZE)

VERY SW SW VERY (DK/SAFE SAFE UNSAFE UNSAFE NA)

[ ]a. Drivers-----------------21%55%---------------------17%4%-------------------------3%

[ ]b. Bicyclists--------------10%38%---------------------36%11%-----------------------5%

[ ]c. Pedestrians-----------16%45%---------------------32%7%-------------------------1%

[ ]d. Residents with

disabilities---------------------13%40%---------------------30%9%-------------------------8%


9/25


13. (T) Next, in general, how do you feel about the current level of local taxesin the City and County of San Francisco do you think that they are toohigh, about right, or too low to meet local needs? (IF TOO HIGH/LOW,ASK:) Is that much too HIGH/LOW or just somewhat?

Much too high------------------------21%Somewhat too high----------------26%About right----------------------------37%Somewhat too low-------------------8%Much too low---------------------------3%(DONT READ) Dont know-------5%

NOW I WOULD LIKE TO RETURN TO OUR DISCUSSION OF THE 248MILLION DOLLAR BOND MEASURE TO REPAIR ROADS AND FUND SAFETYIMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CITYS STREETS.

14. I am going to read you a list of items that might be funded by this bondmeasure. After I read each one, please tell me how important it is to youthat money from the measure be used to pay for each of the followingis itextremely important, very important, somewhat important or not tooimportant? (RANDOMIZE)

EXT VERY SW NOT TOO (DK/(SPLIT SAMPLE A ONLY) IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT NA)

[ ]a. Improving the earthquakesafety of San Franciscostransportation system------------30%

39%----------------------------19%8%--------------------------------5%

[ ]b. Repaving streets inneighborhoods throughout SanFrancisco------------------------------28%

38%----------------------------24%6%--------------------------------3%

[ ]c. Installing sidewalk and curbramps to ensure access for peoplewith disabilities, and to meet theCitys obligations under the

Americans with Disabilities Act24%40%----------------------------20%11%------------------------------4%

[ ]d. Repairing and replacingaging sidewalks to improvepedestrian safety-------------------21%

40%----------------------------23%13%------------------------------3%

[ ]e. Repairing and strengtheningdeteriorating stairways, bridgesand overpasses---------------------30%


10/25


42%----------------------------18%6%--------------------------------4%

[ ]f. Improving pedestrian safetyon street corridors by addinglandscaping, tree planting, andpedestrian lighting to slow down

traffic on busy streets------------14%32%----------------------------31%19%------------------------------5%

[ ]g. Building in-street bikeways,including bike lanes that arephysically separated from motorvehicle traffic------------------------18%

37%----------------------------23%18%------------------------------5%

EXT VERY SW NOT TOO (DK/

(SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY) IMPT IMPT IMPT IMPT NA)[ ]h. Fixing potholes inneighborhoods throughout SanFrancisco------------------------------28%

40%----------------------------21%8%--------------------------------3%

[ ]i. Building a pedestrian plazaand other improvements to attracttourists and encourage businessdevelopment on Jefferson Street inthe heart of Fishermans Wharf- 9%

22%----------------------------29%32%------------------------------7%[ ]j. Replacing out of date trafficsignals with smart traffic signaltechnology, to more efficientlymanage traffic on the Citysbusiest streets and transitcorridors-------------------------------16%

40%----------------------------23%16%------------------------------5%

[ ]k. Replacing worn-out tracks for

MUNI rail lines-----------------------17%41%----------------------------24%11%------------------------------7%

[ ]l. Adding pedestriancountdown signals at intersections

20%----------------------------37%28%----------------------------13%2%

[ ]m. Adding accessible pedestriansignals, which send out audiblesignals for the blind, at


11/25


intersections-------------------------23%38%----------------------------24%9%--------------------------------5%

[ ]n. Installing sidewalk and curbramps to ensure access for peoplewith disabilities---------------------21%

42%----------------------------22%11%------------------------------4%


12/25



NOW I WOULD LIKE TO READ SOME STATEMENTS FROM SUPPORTERSAND OPPONENTS OF THIS BOND MEASURE.

15. First, here are some statements from people who support this bond

measure. After hearing each statement, please tell me whether you find itvery convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason tovote yes on the measure. If you do not believe the statement, please tellme that too. (RANDOMIZE)

(DONTVERY SMWHT NOT DON'T READ)CONV. CONV. CONV. BELIEVE DK/NA

[ ]a. (BROAD BENEFITS) Whetheryou walk, take public transit,bike or drive, we all rely on asafe, smooth, reliable route totravel to and from work, schooland other destinationseveryday. By investing in acomprehensive set of street,sidewalk, and transitimprovements, this measurewill improve safety, decreasetraffic congestion and make iteasier for us all to get aroundtown. ------------------------------34%

---------------------------------------38%---------------------------------------19%----------------------------------------4%----------------------------------------4%

(SPLIT SAMPLE A ONLY)[ ]b. (PEDESTRIAN SAFETY) Over

the last decade, over 200pedestrians have been killed inthe Citymany of them seniors.This measure will improve thesafety of our streets for the

elderly, children and families,especially at intersections nearschools.---------------------------39%---------------------------------------36%---------------------------------------15%----------------------------------------6%----------------------------------------3%

[ ]c. (MUNI) This measure will fundimportant projects to get MUNImoving more efficiently including repairing deteriorating


13/25


track and electrical systems,and better coordinating trafficsignals. These improvementswill make MUNI safer and morereliable, and speed up trafficflow for both drivers and transit

users. -----------------------------35%---------------------------------------37%---------------------------------------15%----------------------------------------9%----------------------------------------4%


14/25



(SPLIT SAMPLE A ONLY CONT.)[ ]d. (JOBS) San Francisco is just

beginning to recover from the

deepest recession in decades,with high unemployment andmany families having troublemaking ends meet. Thismeasure includes provisions toencourage the use of localbusinesses for constructionwork, which could provide overone thousand San Franciscojobs and boost smallbusinesses. ----------------------36%---------------------------------------37%---------------------------------------16%----------------------------------------7%----------------------------------------4%

[ ]e. (SAVE MONEY) This bondmeasure will save taxpayersmoney by addressing criticalmaintenance needs before theyturn into bigger and moreexpensive repairs. Unless wemake these investments now,they will cost four times asmuch in five years.------------38%---------------------------------------32%---------------------------------------18%----------------------------------------9%----------------------------------------3%

(SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY)[ ]f. (POTHOLES) San Francisco has

over 900 miles of roads andsidewalks many of them interrible condition with hugecracks and potholes. In fact,bad roads and potholes costSan Francisco drivers hundredsof dollars per year on averagedue to wear and tear on theircars, and drastically increasetraffic and travel time.-------38%---------------------------------------34%---------------------------------------21%


15/25


----------------------------------------2%----------------------------------------5%

[ ]g. (NO TAX INCREASE) Thismeasure has been specificallydesigned so that tax rates willnot increase. By complying with

the City policy of only issuingnew bonds as old ones are paidoff, this measures full costs canbe funded at current tax rateswith no increase. --------------39%---------------------------------------33%---------------------------------------13%----------------------------------------9%----------------------------------------6%


16/25



SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY CONT.)[ ]h. (BIKES) San Francisco is seeing

a dramatic increase in thenumber of people riding

bicycles for transportation andrecreation. More people ridingbikes means less congestion onpublic transit, and lesscompetition for limited parkingspaces. But safety continues tobe a concern; roadwayimprovements funded by thisbond, including separated bikelanes, will reduce conflicts withcars and pedestrians and areessential to ensure cyclistssafety. ----------------------------38%---------------------------------------29%---------------------------------------21%----------------------------------------6%----------------------------------------6%

[ ]i. (ACCESSIBILITY) One in fiveSan Franciscans has some kindof disability, and as thepopulation ages, the number ofpeople with a disability thataffects their ability to getaround will go up. This bond willhelp people who usewheelchairs, walkers, canes andscooters have curb ramps andsmooth sidewalks throughoutthe City, so that they can get towork, to stores, to medicalappointments and to see familyand friends.----------------------36%---------------------------------------35%---------------------------------------19%----------------------------------------5%----------------------------------------5%


17/25


(RESUME ASKING ALL RESPONDENTS)16. Now that you have heard more about it, let me ask you again about the 248

million dollar bond measure to fix potholes, repave streets and reconstructsidewalks in neighborhoods throughout San Francisco; improve safety forpedestrians and bicyclists; improve MUNI reliability and traffic flow on localstreets and intersections; repair and deteriorating bridges and staircases;

and improve disabled access to sidewalks. Do you think you would vote yesin favor of this bond measure or no to oppose it? (IF YES/NO ASK): "Isthat definitely (yes/no) or just probably (yes/no)?" (IF UNDECIDED,ASK:) Well, do you lean towards voting yes or no?

TOTAL YES 69%Definitely yes 37%Probably yes 21%

Undecided, lean yes---------------11%

TOTAL NO 23%

Undecided, lean no------------------4%Probably no 6%Definitely no 13%

(DON'T READ) DK/NA 8%


18/25


17. Next, here are some statements from people who oppose this bondmeasure. After hearing each statement, please tell me whether you find itvery convincing, somewhat convincing, or not convincing as a reason tovote no on the measure. If you do not believe the statement, please tell methat too. (RANDOMIZE)

(DONTVERY SMWHT NOT DON'T READ)

(SPLIT SAMPLE A ONLY) CONV. CONV. CONV.BELIEVE DK/NA

[ ]a. (TAXES) No matter whatsupporters of this bondmeasure say, it will inevitablyraise our taxes. The averagehomeowner will pay 55 dollarsmore each year if this measurepasses than they will if it isdefeated--------------------------18%---------------------------------------26%---------------------------------------43%----------------------------------------8%----------------------------------------6%

[ ]b. (MISMANAGEMENT) Yearafter year, politicians short-change our streets to fund theirown pet projects. Instead oftaking care of the roads likethey are supposed to, theywant taxpayers to pay more.Enough is enough we shouldvote no and force the politiciansto fund needed street repairsout of the existing budget- -25%---------------------------------------25%---------------------------------------38%----------------------------------------6%----------------------------------------5%

[ ]c. (WRONG WAY) Many citiespay for street and road repairs

on a year-by-year basis out oftheir general budgets ratherthan borrowing money througha bond measure and thenpaying huge interest costs.Thats how San Franciscoshould do it, too----------------23%---------------------------------------28%---------------------------------------36%----------------------------------------6%----------------------------------------7%


19/25


(SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY)

[ ]d. (TOO MUCH DEBT) In justthe last few years, voters havealready approved huge bondmeasures for San Francisco

General Hospital, earthquakesafety and schools. We simplycannot afford to take on anymore debt right now----------26%---------------------------------------29%---------------------------------------34%----------------------------------------7%----------------------------------------4%


20/25


(DONTVERY SMWHT NOT DON'T READ)

(SPLIT SAMPLE B ONLY CONT.) CONV. CONV. CONV.BELIEVE DK/NA

[ ]e. (JEFFERSON STREET) At atime when the city is cuttingfunding for health care,education and emergencyservices, this measure wouldspend tens of millions oftaxpayer dollars on aremodeling project in one tinyarea of the CityJeffersonStreet in anticipation of theAmericas Cup. The bond woulddevote more money to thisproject than to all othersidewalk, bridge and overpassimprovements citywide------41%---------------------------------------27%---------------------------------------20%----------------------------------------7%----------------------------------------5%

[ ]f. (THREE YEARS) Even at 248million dollars, this bondmeasure will only pay for threeyears of a projected ten-yearroad improvement project. Itwill cost us an enormousamount of money, and will noteven solve half of the streetrepair needs that the City hasidentified--------------------------29%---------------------------------------25%---------------------------------------32%----------------------------------------8%----------------------------------------7%

(RESUME ASKING ALL RESPONDENTS)18.

Having heard this, let me ask you one last time about the 248 million dollarbond measure to fix potholes, repave streets and reconstruct sidewalks inneighborhoods throughout San Francisco; improve safety for pedestriansand bicyclists; improve MUNI reliability and traffic flow on local streets andintersections; repair and deteriorating bridges and staircases; and improvedisabled access to sidewalks. Do you think you would vote yes in favor ofthis bond measure or no to oppose it? (IF YES/NO ASK): "Is thatdefinitely (yes/no) or just probably (yes/no)?" (IF UNDECIDED, ASK:)Well, do you lean towards voting yes or no?

TOTAL YES 67%


21/25


Definitely yes 32%Probably yes 21%

Undecided, lean yes---------------14%

TOTAL NO 26%Undecided, lean no------------------4%

Probably no 9%Definitely no 13%



22/25


HERE ARE MY LAST QUESTIONS, AND THEY ARE FORSTATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY.

19. Which of the following modes of transportation do you use regularly whenyou are traveling within the City of San Francisco? (READ LIST, ACCEPT

MULTIPLE RESPONSES)

Driving 66%Biking 15%

Walking--------------------------------33%Riding MUNI--------------------------40%


20. (T) How would you describe yourself politically: are you progressive, liberal,moderate, or conservative?

Progressive---------------------------17%Liberal----------------------------------31%Moderate------------------------------32%Conservative-------------------------13%(DON'T READ) DK/NA/REFUSED8%

21. (T) Do you ... (READ LIST)

Own a single family home-------45%Own a condominium or T-I-C 12%Rent an apartment or home 41%

(DON'T READ) DK/NA/REFUSED 3%

22. With which racial or ethnic group do you identify yourself: Hispanic orLatino; African American or Black; Anglo or White; Asian or PacificIslander; or some other ethnic or racial background?

Latino/Hispanic------------------------7%African American/Black-------------5%White-----------------------------------68%Asian/Pacific Islander--------------15%(MIXED RACE)-----------------------2%

(OTHER)--------------------------------2%(DONT READ) DK/NA/REFUSED2%


23/25


(ASK Q23 ONLY IF ASIAN/PACIFIC ISLANDER CODE 4 IN Q22)23. More specifically, would you say that you are? (READ LIST)

Chinese--------------------------------75%Filipino----------------------------------14%

Indian ------------------------------------2%Japanese---------------------------------3%Korean-----------------------------------1%Vietnamese-----------------------------0%(MIXED RACE)-----------------------2%(OTHER)--------------------------------0%(DONT READ) DK/NA/REFUSED3%

(RESUME ASKING ALL RESPONDENTS)24. (T) In what year were you born?

1993-1987 (18-24)-------------------1%

1986-1982 (25-29)-------------------5%1981-1977 (30-34)-------------------9%1976-1972 (35-39)-------------------8%1971-1967 (40-44)-------------------9%1966-1962 (45-49)-----------------10%1961-1957 (50-54)-----------------11%1956-1952 (55-59)-----------------10%1951-1947 (60-64)-------------------7%1946-1937 (65-74)-----------------14%1936 or earlier (75 & over)------11%(DON'T READ) DK/Refused------4%

25. (T) I don't need to know the exact amount, but I'm going to read yousome categories for household income. Would you please stop mewhen I have read the category indicating the total combined incomefor all the people in your household before taxes in 2010?

$30,000 and under-----------------12%$30,001 - $60,000------------------24%$60,001 - $90,000------------------16%$90,001 - $120,000------------------9%$120,001 - $150,000----------------6%

More than $150,000-----------------8%(DON'T READ) Refused---------27%


24/25


26. If you dont mind my asking, what is your sexual orientation? (DONOT READ)

Heterosexual 72%Gay or lesbian 8%

Bisexual 2%Transgender 0%(DON'T READ) Prefer not to say 13%(DON'T READ)DK/NA 5%

THANK AND TERMINATE

SEX (BY OBSERVATION): Male-----------------------------------50%Female--------------------------------50%

PARTY REGISTRATION: Democrat----------------------------60%

Republican--------------------------11%Decline to State-------------------22%Other------------------------------------7%

LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW: English--------------------------------92%Chinese--------------------------------8%


25/25


Name_______________________________ Precinct #_________________________

Address____________________________ Interviewer________________________

City_________________________________ Page #____________________________

Zip_________________________________ Voter ID#_________________________

Phone #____________________________ Cluster #__________________________

FLAGSP06--------------------------------------61%G06--------------------------------------85%P08--------------------------------------70%G08--------------------------------------96%M09--------------------------------------57%

P10--------------------------------------70%G10--------------------------------------88%Blank--------------------------------------1%

HOUSEHOLD PARTY TYPEDem 1----------------------------------41%Dem 2+--------------------------------12%Rep 1-------------------------------------8%Rep 2+-----------------------------------2%Ind 1+----------------------------------20%Mixed-----------------------------------17%

VOTE BY MAIL1------------------------------------------10%2--------------------------------------------6%3+---------------------------------------49%BLANK----------------------------------35%

PERMANENT ABSENTEE VOTERYes---------------------------------------55%No----------------------------------------45%

SUPERVISOR DISTRICTDistrict 1---------------------------------8%District 2---------------------------------9%District 3---------------------------------8%District 4---------------------------------9%

District 5-------------------------------10%District 6---------------------------------8%District 7-------------------------------11%District 8-------------------------------13%District 9---------------------------------8%District 10-------------------------------8%District 11-------------------------------8%

San Francisco Voter Survey Results April 2011

Documents

Transcript of San Francisco Voter Survey Results April 2011