samhda.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com · Terms of Use These data are distributed under the...

Uniform Facility Data Set, 1997:[United States]

United States Department of Health andHuman Services. Substance Abuse andMental Health Services Administration.Office of Applied Studies

Codebook

is sponsored by

Terms of Use These data are distributed under the following terms of use. By continuing past this page, you signify your agreement to comply with the requirements as stated below:

Privacy of Research Subjects Any intentional identification of a research subject (whether an individual or an organization) or unauthorized disclosure of his or her confidential information violates the promise of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. Disclosure of confidential information may also be punishable under federal law. Therefore, users of data agree:

To use these datasets solely for research or statistical purposes and not for re-identification of specific research subjects.

To make no use of the identity of any research subject discovered inadvertently and toreport any such discovery to CBHSQ and SAMHDA ([email protected])

Citing Data You agree to reference the recommended bibliographic citation in any of your publications that use SAMHDA data. Authors of publications that use SAMHDA data are required to send citations of their published works for inclusion in a database of related publications.

Disclaimer You acknowledge that SAMHSA will bear no responsibility for your use of the data or for your interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.

mailto:[email protected]



Violations If CBHSQ determines that this terms of use agreement has been violated, then possible sanctions

could include:

Report of the violation to the Research Integrity Officer, Institutional Review Board, orHuman Subjects Review Committee of the user's institution. A range of sanctions areavailable to institutions including revocation of tenure and termination.

If the confidentiality of human subjects has been violated, then report of the violationmay be made to the Federal Office for Human Research Protections. This may result inan investigation of the user's institution, which can result in institution-wide sanctionsincluding the suspension of all research grants.

Report of the violation of federal law to the United States Attorney General for possibleprosecution.

Court awarded payments of damages to any individual(s)/organization(s) harmed by thebreach of confidential data.

Definitions CBHSQ

Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality

Promise of confidentiality

A promise to a respondent or research participant that the information the respondent provides will not be disseminated in identifiable form without the permission of the respondent; that the fact that the respondent participated in the study will not be disclosed; and that disseminated information will include no linkages to the identity of the respondent. Such a promise encompasses traditional notions of both confidentiality and anonymity. In most cases, federal law protects the confidentiality of the respondent's identity as referenced in the Promise of Confidentiality. Under this condition, names and other identifying information regarding respondents would be confidential.

Research subject A person or organization that participates in a research study. A research subject may also be called a respondent. A respondent is generally a survey respondent or informant, experimental or observational subject, focus group participant, or any other person providing information to a study.

SAMHDA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Data Archive

SAMHSA Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Information about Copyrighted Content

Some instruments administered as part of this study may contain in whole or substantially in part contents from copyrighted instruments. Reproductions of the instruments are provided as documentation for the analysis of the data associated with this collection. Restrictions on "fair use" apply to all copyrighted content. More information about the reproduction of copyrighted works by educators and librarians is available from the United States Copyright Office.

NOTICE WARNING CONCERNING COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS

The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be "used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research." If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that user may be liable for copyright infringement.

***Processor Note*** UFDS, 1997

SERIES NAME: UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET

SERIES INFORMATION: The data elements and format that make up the core of the UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET (UFDS) were first used in 1976 as part of survey efforts designed to measure the scope and use of drug abuse treatment services in the United States. This core was used throughout the 1970s and 1980s in several different surveys. In 1987, the National Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Unit Survey (NDATUS) was first administered and was then conducted annually from 1989 to 1993. After the creation of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) in 1992, NDATUS was redesigned and, since 1995, has been conducted annually as the UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET (UFDS) survey. UFDS is one of three components of SAMHSA's Drug and Alcohol Services Information System (DASIS) and is designed to provide the mechanism for quantifying the substance abuse treatment delivery system in the United States. DASIS was created in 1995 to facilitate the integration of SAMHSA's existing treatment services data sets and to reduce redundancy in data collection and reporting. The other two DASIS components are the National Master Facility Inventory (NMFI) and the Treatment Episode Data Set (TEDS). The NMFI is a comprehensive listing of all known substance abuse treatment, education, and prevention facilities in the United States. The TEDS is a client-level database of individuals admitted to publicly-funded substance abuse treatment facilities and is available from the SAMHDA Web site. Together, these three DASIS components provide national- and state-level data on persons receiving alcohol and substance abuse treatment as well as data on the facilities providing the treatment.

Drug and Alcohol Services Information System

Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS):1997

Public Use File Documentation -R

Office of Applied Studies

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

OFFICE OF APPLIED STUDIES

Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): 1997

Public Use File Documentation

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services AdministrationU.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

5600 Fishers Lane, Room 16-105Rockville, Maryland 20857

1.1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

The 1997 Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS)survey was conducted between October1997 and March 1998 with a reference

date of October 1, 1997. It was the 21st in aseries of national surveys designed to measurethe location, characteristics, and use of alcohol-ism and drug abuse treatment facilities andservices throughout the United States, the Districtof Columbia, and other U.S. jurisdictions.1 UFDSis the responsibility of the Office of AppliedStudies, Substance Abuse and Mental HealthServices Administration (SAMHSA).

Publications based on the 1997 UFDS surveyinclude an analysis of results2 and the NationalDirectory of Drug Abuse and Alcoholism Treat-ment and Prevention Programs.

UFDS has evolved from national survey effortsbegun in the 1970s by the National Institute onDrug Abuse (NIDA) to measure the scope anduse of drug abuse treatment services in the UnitedStates. The sixth of these surveys, conducted in1976, introduced the data elements and formatthat have formed the core of subsequent surveys.These include organizational setting, serviceorientation, services available, clients in treat-

ment by type of care, capacity, and annual reve-nue sources and amounts. The 1976 survey,called the National Drug Abuse Treatment Utili-zation Survey, was repeated in 1977 and 1978. In1979, the National Institute on Alcohol Abuseand Alcoholism (NIAAA) became a co-sponsorof the survey, alcoholism treatment facilitieswere added, and the study was renamed theNational Drug and Alcoholism Treatment Utiliza-tion Survey. This survey was repeated in 1980and 1982. In 1984, a one-page version was used(the National Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Pro-gram Inventory). In 1987, the full version of thesurvey was reinstated, and it was renamed theNational Drug and Alcoholism Treatment UnitSurvey (NDATUS). NDATUS was conductedannually from 1989-1993. In 1992, with thecreation of SAMHSA, responsibility for conduct-ing the survey shifted to SAMHSA’s Office ofApplied Studies. The survey was redesigned, andconducted annually as the Uniform Facility DataSet survey beginning in 1995.

UFDS is designed to collect information fromeach facility in the country that provides sub-stance abuse treatment, and from State-identifiedfacilities providing other substance abuse ser-vices.3 UFDS includes private and publicly-funded facilities. All facilities report identifyinginformation. Treatment facilities also report dataon the type of services provided, numbers ofclients, client demographics (i.e., age, sex, andrace/ethnicity groups), other client characteris-

1 The jurisdictions include the territories of American Samoaand Guam, the Federated States of Micronesia, theRepublic of Palau, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, andthe Virgin Islands of the United States.

2 Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and MentalHealth Services Administration (1999). The UniformFacility Data Set (UFDS) Survey: 1997. Data onSubstance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Drug andAlcohol Services Information System Series: S6. DHHSPub. No. (SMA) 99-3314.

3 Entities responding to UFDS are referred to as “facilities”.This designation is consistent with the title of the survey,although, as discussed below, a “facility” may be aprogram-level, clinic-level, or multi-site respondent.

1.2

tics, capacity, and sources and amounts of reve-nue.

UFDS provides the mechanism for quantifyingthe dynamic character and composition of theU.S. substance abuse treatment delivery system.The UFDS objectives are:

! to assist SAMHSA and State and local gov-ernments in assessing the nature and extent ofservices of State-supported and other treat-ment facilities, and in forecasting treatmentresource requirements;

! to update SAMHSA’s National Master Facil-ity Inventory (NMFI) of all known drug abuseand alcoholism treatment facilities and State-identified facilities providing other substanceabuse services (described further below);

! to analyze general treatment services trendsand to conduct comparative analyses for thenation, regions, and States; and

! to generate the National Directory of DrugAbuse and Alcoholism Treatment and Pre-vention Programs, a compendium of State-tracked facilities providing substance abusetreatment, prevention, and other services.

UFDS in the Context of DASIS

UFDS is one of the three components ofSAMHSA’s Drug and Alcohol Services Informa-tion System (DASIS). DASIS was created in1995 to facilitate the integration of SAMHSA’sexisting treatment services data sets and toreduce redundancy and reporting burdens. Thecore of DASIS is the National Master FacilityInventory (NMFI), a continuously-updated com-prehensive listing of all known substance abusetreatment facilities and State-identified preven-tion and education facilities. The other compo-nents of DASIS are the UFDS survey and theTreatment Episode Data Set (TEDS), a client-

level database of persons admitted to substanceabuse treatment. A unique ID number assigned tothe NMFI facility is used in the collection offacility-level data (UFDS) and client-level data(TEDS) so that the three data sets can be linked.Together, they provide national- and State-levelinformation on the numbers and characteristics ofindividuals admitted to alcohol and drug treat-ment and describe the facilities that deliver careto those individuals.

The NMFI is the sampling universe for UFDS.Facilities in the NMFI fall into four generalcategories. These are distinguished by the ser-vices provided, the components of DASIS ofwhich they are part, and the relationship of thefacility to its State substance abuse agency. Thesecategories are described below.

Treatment facilities administratively tracked byStates and reporting to TEDS

The largest group of facilities (about 9,200 in1997) includes facilities that are licensed orcertified by the State substance abuse agency toprovide substance abuse treatment (or are admin-istratively tracked for other reasons), and arerequired by the States to provide TEDS client-level data. State DASIS representatives maintainthis segment of the NMFI by reporting newfacilities, closures, and address changes toSAMHSA.

Treatment facilities administratively tracked byStates but not reporting to TEDS

This group (about 5,300 facilities in 1997)includes treatment facilities that are licensed,certified, or otherwise approved by the Statesubstance abuse agency (or are administrativelytracked for other reasons), but that are not re-quired by the States to provide TEDS client-level data. Some private for-profit facilities fallinto this category. This group also includesprograms operated by Federal agencies (the

1.3

Bureau of Prisons, Department of VeteransAffairs, Department of Defense, and IndianHealth Service). NMFI records for Federally-operated facilities are updated annually throughlists provided by these agencies.

Treatment facilities not administrativelytracked by States

This group of facilities (about 2,500 in 1997)represents the ongoing SAMHSA effort to makethe NMFI as comprehensive as possible byincluding treatment facilities that States, for avariety of reasons, do not track. Many of thesefacilities are private for-profit, small grouppractices, or hospital-based programs. Most ofthem were identified through screening of alter-native source databases such as the commercialAmerican Business Index, the annual AmericanHospital Association survey, and SAMHSA’sbiennial Inventory of Mental Health Organiza-tions. States are given the opportunity to reviewthese lists and to add these facilities to the State-tracked list if appropriate.

Non-treatment facilities administrativelytracked by States

These facilities (about 2,400 in 1997) provideprevention, education, intake, assessment, refer-ral, or administrative services. The listing of thisgroup of facilities is provided by State DASISrepresentatives.

NMFI-Imposed Constraints on UFDS

The use of the NMFI as the sampling universe forUFDS imposes certain constraints, concernedprimarily with the unit of response and the scopeof facilities included. The NMFI is largely acompilation of facilities in State administrativesystems. Each State has a different system, anddifferent criteria for eligibility.

Unit of response

SAMHSA requests that facilities be reported tothe NMFI, UFDS, and TEDS at the same admin-istrative level so that record linkage among thethree data sets is valid. SAMHSA requests thatStates use point of delivery of service (i.e.,physical location) as the defining factor for afacility. However, because of the different Stateadministrative systems, there is no consistent useof this definition for a treatment facility. Forexample, in some States, multiple treatmentprograms (e.g., detox, residential, and outpatient)at the same address and under the same manage-ment have separate State licenses. These aretreated as separate by the State, and receiveseparate NMFI ID numbers. In other States,multiple sites are included as a single entityunder a parent or administrative unit. In many ofthese cases, individual sites can report client andservices data, but revenue data are available onlyat a higher administrative level.

Until 1996, State substance abuse agenciesdistributed and collected the NDATUS/UFDSsurvey forms. Beginning in 1996, data collectionwas centralized and UFDS forms were sentdirectly to the facilities. A small percentage offacilities elected to report data at a higher admin-istrative level than the State-determined NMFIfacility level.

Thus UFDS data on the numbers of facilities, andon revenues, client counts, and services by typeof facility must be interpreted with caution.Assessment of changes in the number of facilitiesover time may be more valid, assuming thatindividual States retain consistent definitions.

Scope of facilities included

The scope of facilities included in the NMFI isaffected by differences in State systems of licen-sure, certification, accreditation, and the dis-bursement of public funds. For example, some

1.4

State substance abuse agencies regulate privatefacilities and individual practitioners whileothers do not. In some States, hospital-basedsubstance abuse treatment facilities are notlicensed through the State substance abuseagency. Some State substance abuse agenciestrack correctional facilities (State prisons andlocal jails) while others do not.

In an effort to address this, SAMHSA conducteda large-scale effort during 1995 and 1996 toidentify substance abuse treatment facilities that,for a variety of reasons, were not on the NMFI.Some 15 source lists were considered, andfacilities not on the NMFI were contacted toascertain whether they provided substance abusetreatment. As expected, this yielded a number ofhospital-based and small private facilities thatwere not on the NMFI. These facilities were sentthe UFDS survey beginning in 1995, but theywere not included in the published results of thesurvey until 1997.

Some facilities operated by Federal agencies (theBureau of Prisons, Department of VeteransAffairs, Department of Defense, and IndianHealth Service) are tracked, but not regulated, bythe States. NMFI records for Federally-operatedfacilities are updated annually through listsprovided by these Federal agencies. Facilitiesoperated by the Bureau of Prisons were excludedfrom the 1997 UFDS because SAMHSA con-ducted a separate survey of correctional facilities(report forthcoming).

Procedures for the 1997 UFDS

Survey universe

The UFDS survey was sent to all facilities thatwere on the NMFI as of about 6 weeks before thesurvey reference date (October 1, 1997).

Content

The 1997 UFDS survey instrument was a 10-page document with 28 numbered questions (seeAppendix A). Respondents provided informationon treatment operations and on clients receivingcare on October 1, 1997. Topics included:

! Facility identification information! Ownership! Hotline operation! Substance abuse services (treatment, preven-

tion, administrative, drunk-driving only,other)

! Organizational setting! Organizational relationships (parent or affili-

ate(s); financial parent or affiliate(s), partici-pation in managed care)

! Waiting list information! Clients in treatment as of the survey reference

date, including: Client counts by type of care (hospital

detoxification or rehabilitation, residen-tial detoxification or rehabilitation, inten-sive outpatient and other outpatient)

Client counts by demographics (agegroup, sex, race/ethnicity) and type ofcare

Proportions treated for alcohol only, drugonly, and both substances

Number receiving methadone/LAAM Proportions of clients in selected popula-

tion sub-groups (pregnant women,women with dependent children, injec-tion drug users, persons with active TB,HIV-positive clients, clients in treatmentpreviously, managed care clients, correc-tional clients )

! Beds available for treatment of substanceabuse (hospital or residential) as of thesurvey reference date

! Annual unduplicated client count! Annual total admissions! Specific services (assessment, therapy,

testing, health services, programs for specialgroups, etc.)

! Annual revenue sources and amounts

1.5

Data collection

Prior to the survey, faxes or letters were sent toall facilities to update address information, andto alert the facility to expect the survey. Datacollection instruments (with State letters ofendorsement or other enclosures) were mailed toeach facility. During the data collection phase,contract personnel were available to answerfacilities’ questions concerning the survey. Twoweeks after the initial mailing, thank you/remin-der letters were sent to all facilities. Five to sixweeks after the initial mailing, non-respondentfacilities were sent a second mailing. About fiveweeks after the second mailing, non-respondentsreceived a reminder telephone call. Those facili-ties that had not responded within two to threeweeks of the reminder call were telephoned andasked to complete a slightly abbreviated versionof the survey by telephone.

Forms accounting and response rate

Summary response rate information is presentedin Table 1.1 A total of 19,956 forms were dis-tributed to facilities. Of these facilities, 10percent were determined to have been closed onthe survey reference date, and data for 6 percentwere “rolled up” (i.e., data were included withthose reported by an administratively-linkedfacility), yielding an effective sample size of16,695. Of the effective sample, 70 percentcompleted the full mail survey and 16 percentcompleted the telephone survey, resulting in asurvey response rate of 86 percent. Non-respon-dents may have included facilities that wereclosed but could not be so identified.

Table 1.1Forms accounting and response rate:

UFDS 1997

Number

Percentof

totalforms

Percentof

effectivesample

Total forms distributed

19,956 100.0

Closed facility 2,057 10.3

Roll-up (datareported by anotherfacility)

1,204 6.0

Effective sample 16,695 83.7 100.0

Respondents 14,291 71.6 85.6

Mail 11,627 58.3 69.6

Telephone 2,664 13.3 16.0

Non-respondents 2,404 12.0 14.4

Quality assurance

All mail questionnaires were reviewed forinconsistencies and missing data. After dataentry, automated quality assurance reviews wereconducted. These included the rules used inmanual editing, plus consistency checks notreadily implemented by manual review. If prob-lems were detected at either phase of editing thatcould not be resolved, facilities were contactedby telephone and the correct information secured.Non-response follow-up interviews conductedby telephone used a computer-assisted techniquewith built-in editing rules. The review processassured proper formatting, mechanical correct-ness, and internal consistency among responses.

Item non-response

The editing process ensured that item non-re-sponse was minimal. A few facilities did notprovide client demographics; missing data wereimputed using averaged responses from facilities

1.6

in the same State and with similar ownership andclient mix characteristics.

Calculated variables

The 1997 UFDS questionnaire permitted somefacilities to indicate more than one organizationalsetting (the setting within which services aredelivered and, for settings specializing in sub-stance abuse treatment, the general type of careoffered). For the 1997 annual UFDS report, eachfacility was assigned to a single organizationalsetting (see Appendix B for details). This vari-able is included in the public use file.

Question 13 requested the percentages of clientsreceiving treatment for alcohol abuse only, drugabuse only, and both alcohol and drug abuse.Client numbers were calculated from thesepercentages for the number of active clientsreported in Question 12g. These variables areincluded in the public use file.

Question 17 requested either client numbers orpercentages of clients in various categories. Ifnumbers were reported, percentages were calcu-lated, and vice versa, for the number of activeclients reported in Question 12g.

Profile of Responding Facilities

Facilities provided a range of substance abusetreatment, prevention, related services (e.g.,intake, assessment, referral), and administrativefunctions. A significant number of treatmentfacilities were engaged in a range of services andwere not restricted solely to the provision ofclinical care. One-third of facilities served allfour functions; another 46 percent provided somecombination of these functions. Only 18 percentwere single-function facilities.

There were 385 facilities that offered only drunkdriving or DUI/DWI programs. For the 1997

UFDS survey, these were not required to com-plete the full survey.

The public use file is comprised of the 10,860treatment facilities (76 percent of reportingfacilities) that provided treatment services, eitheralone or in conjunction with other substanceabuse services. Most of these 10,860 facilities(82 percent) completed the full survey, while 18percent completed the telephone survey (seeAppendix A).

Further Data Considerations and Limitations

As with any data collection effort, certain proce-dural considerations and data limitations must betaken into account when interpreting data fromthe 1997 UFDS. Some of these are outlinedabove. Some general issues are discussed here;considerations and limitations of specific dataitems are discussed where the data are presented.

! UFDS attempts to obtain responses from allknown treatment and prevention facilities, butit is a voluntary survey. Treatment facilitiesare not included if they did not respond to thesurvey. There is no adjustment for facilitynon-response.

! Careful editing, extensive follow-up, andimputation of selected variables have greatlyreduced item non-response. There are in-stances of non-response in many data items,however, and some variables have an ex-plicit Unknown response option. In addition,respondents contacted by telephone com-pleted a slightly abbreviated version of thesurvey (see Appendix A). To avoid the lossof usable information, all responding facili-ties were retained in the database.

! UFDS collects data about facilities, notindividual clients. Data on clients representan aggregate of clients in treatment for eachreporting facility. Demographic data are

1.7

collected in different matrices of the surveyform and cannot be cross-tabulated. While itis possible to report how many female clientsand how many clients under age 18 were intreatment at a facility, the number of femaleclients under 18 cannot be determined.

Uniform Facility Data Set, 1997: [United States]

Variable Description and Frequencies

Note: Frequencies displayed for the variables are not weighted.They are purely descriptive andmay not be representative of thestudy population. Please review any sampling or weightinginformation available with the study.

Summary statistics (minimum, maximum, mean, median, andstandard deviation) may not be available for every variable inthe codebook. Conversely, a listing of frequencies in table formatmay not be present for every variable in the codebook either.However, all variables in the dataset are present and displaysufficient information about each variable. These decisions aremade intentionally and are at the discretion of the archiveproducing this codebook.

- 1 -

http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/content/shared/ICPSR/faqs/can-i-use-this-question-in-building-my.html

CASEID: CASE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER

Based upon 10,860 valid cases out of 10,860 total cases.

Location: 1-5 (width: 5; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric

MODE: MAIL OR PHONE

Survey data collected by:

%UnweightedFrequency

LabelValue

17.5 %1902TELEPHONE FOLLOW-UP1

82.5 %8958MAIL SURVEY2

Missing Data

100%10,860Total


• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 2

Location: 6-7 (width: 2; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric(Range of) Missing Values: -9

STFIPS: STATE

State abbreviation


LabelValue

0.7 %77ALABAMA1

0.6 %60ALASKA2

0.0 %0ARKANSAS3

1.3 %142ARIZONA4

0.5 %55ARKANSAS5

10.8 %1178CALIFORNIA6

0.0 %0CONNECTICUT7

1.3 %143COLORADO8

1.9 %209CONNECTICUT9

0.4 %41DELAWARE10

0.4 %40DIST OF COLUMBIA11

4.8 %526FLORIDA12

1.4 %152GEORGIA13

0.0 %0IDAHO14

0.6 %69HAWAII15

0.4 %39IDAHO16

4.3 %467ILLINOIS17

2.3 %251INDIANA18

- 2 -


LabelValue

0.7 %78IOWA19

1.3 %145KANSAS20

2.1 %231KENTUCKY21

1.3 %137LOUISIANA22

1.2 %131MAINE23

2.8 %304MARYLAND24

2.9 %310MASSACHUSETTS25

5.5 %597MICHIGAN26

2.2 %239MINNESOTA27

0.7 %71MISSISSIPPI28

1.3 %142MISSOURI29

0.4 %45MONTANA30

0.9 %97NEBRASKA31

0.7 %71NEVADA32

0.5 %54NEW HAMPSHIRE33

2.2 %237NEW JERSEY34

0.7 %71NEW MEXICO35

10.9 %1184NEW YORK36

1.3 %139NORTH CAROLINA37

0.4 %40NORTH DAKOTA38

4.5 %484OHIO39

1.0 %108OKLAHOMA40

1.5 %160OREGON41

4.4 %475PENNSYLVANIA42

0.0 %0SOUTH DAKOTA43

0.5 %59RHODE ISLAND44

0.6 %64SOUTH CAROLINA45

0.5 %51SOUTH DAKOTA46

1.2 %132TENNESSEE47

4.6 %504TEXAS48

1.0 %112UTAH49

0.2 %20VERMONT50

Missing Data

100%10,860Total

Please note that only the first 50 response categories are displayed in the PDF codebook. To view all response categories, pleaseanalyze the data file in the statistical package of your choice (SAS, SPSS, Stata, R).



Location: 8-9 (width: 2; decimal: 0)

- 3 -

Variable Type: numeric(Range of) Missing Values: -9

TREATMT: DOES FACILITY PROVIDE TREATMENT SVCS

On October 1, 1997, which of the following services were provided by this facility at this site? MARK ALL THAT APPLY Substanceabuse treatment


LabelValue

100.0 %10860YES1

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




PREVNTN: DOES FACILITY PROVIDE PREVENTION SVCS

On October 1, 1997, which of the following services were provided by this facility at this site? MARK ALL THAT APPLY Substanceabuse prevention


LabelValue

46.8 %5084NO0

53.1 %5771YES1

Missing Data

0.0 %5MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OTHNONTX: DOES FACILITY PROVIDE OTHER SERVICES

OnOctober 1, 1997, which of the following services were provided by this facility at this site? MARK ALL THAT APPLYOther substanceabuse services


LabelValue

14.5 %1579NO0

85.4 %9277YES1

- 4 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.0 %4MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OWNERSHP: OWNER RESPONSIBLE FOR FACILITY

Who is the owner of this substance abuse facility? MARK ONE ONLY


LabelValue

23.5 %2550PRIVATE-FOR-PROFIT1

59.8 %6498PRIVATE NON-PROFIT2

4.4 %483STATE GOVERNMENT3

8.2 %887LOCAL GOVERNMENT4

1.4 %149TRIBAL GOVERNMENT5

2.7 %293FEDERAL GOVERNMENT6

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




FEDOWN: WHICH FED GVRNMNT AGENCY OWNS FACILITY

Which federal government agency? MARK ONE ONLY


LabelValue

1.4 %154DEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS1

0.9 %102DEPT OF DEFENSE2

0.3 %35INDIAN HEALTH SVC4

0.0 %2OTHER5

Missing Data

97.3 %10567MISSING-9

- 5 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total

Based upon 293 valid cases out of 10,860 total cases.



HOTYN: DOES FACILITY OPERATE HOTLINE

Does this facility operate or participate in a hotline that provides substance abuse counseling and referral services?


LabelValue

26.7 %2903YES1

73.3 %7957NO2

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




LOC1: IF OTHER SETTING, OUTPATIENT

More specifically would you describe this facility as: (MARK YES OR NO FOREACH)

OUTPATIENT substance abuse treatment facility


LabelValue

45.6 %4952YES1

21.0 %2285NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 6 -


LOC2: IF OTHER SETTING, COMM MENTAL HEALTH


Community MENTAL health center or other mental health facility that provides avariety of services


LabelValue

17.8 %1928YES1

48.9 %5309NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




LOC3: IF OTHER SETTING, COMM HEALTH CENTER


Community Health Center, including Migrant Health Center, Urban Indian Program,Health Care for the Homeless Center


LabelValue

2.1 %232YES1

64.5 %7005NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 7 -


LOC4: IF OTHER SETTING, HALFWAY HOUSE


Halfway house


LabelValue

6.7 %733YES1

59.9 %6504NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




LOC5: IF OTHER SETTING, THERAPEUTIC COMMUNITY


Therapeutic community


LabelValue

8.4 %916YES1

58.2 %6321NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 8 -

LOC6: IF OTHER SETTING, RESIDENTIAL S.A. TX


Other RESIDENTIAL substance abuse treatment facility


LabelValue

17.1 %1852YES1

49.6 %5385NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




LOC7: IF OTHER SETTING, RELIG/COMMUNITY ORG


Community or religious organization/agency that provides a variety of socialservices


LabelValue

6.5 %708YES1

60.1 %6529NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




LOC8: IF OTHER SETTING, SOME OTHER TYPE

- 9 -


Other


LabelValue

4.9 %527YES1

61.8 %6710NO2

Missing Data

33.4 %3623MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




MGMCARE: IS FACILITY OWNED BY MGD CARE ORGANZTN

Is this facility owned or operated by a managed care organization (for example, an HMO)?


LabelValue

1.4 %153YES1

98.2 %10660NO2

Missing Data

0.4 %47MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




WRITARRA: DID FACILITY HAVE CONTRACTS W/ MGD CRE

On October 1, 1997, did this facility have letters of agreement or contacts with managed care organizations for providing substanceabuse treatment services?


LabelValue

46.4 %5040YES1

47.7 %5183NO2

- 10 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

5.9 %637MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




WRITNUM: HOW MANY MGD CRE CNTRCTS FACILITY HAVE

With how many managed care organizations did you have formal written agreements or contracts?


LabelValue

6.5 %708-1

5.3 %576-2

4.5 %494-3

3.9 %422-4

3.8 %413-5

2.3 %253-6

1.5 %162-7

1.4 %157-8

0.6 %70-9

3.1 %341-10

0.4 %41-11

1.3 %144-12

0.4 %44-13

0.6 %61-14

1.2 %133-15

0.2 %21-16

0.3 %29-17

0.3 %33-18

0.1 %10-19

1.3 %139-20

0.1 %14-21

0.1 %10-22

0.1 %7-23

0.1 %13-24

0.7 %74-25

0.0 %4-26

0.1 %11-27

- 11 -


LabelValue

0.1 %6-28

0.1 %6-29

0.7 %79-30

0.0 %5-31

0.1 %8-32

0.0 %5-33

0.0 %4-34

0.3 %29-35

0.1 %10-36

0.0 %3-37

0.1 %7-38

0.0 %1-39

0.3 %33-40

0.0 %1-41

0.1 %8-42

0.0 %2-43

0.1 %6-44

0.1 %8-45

0.0 %5-46

0.0 %3-47

0.1 %6-48

0.0 %1-49

0.4 %45-50

Missing Data

56.1 %6095MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 9.95• Median: 5.00• Mode: 1.00• Minimum: 1• Maximum: 300• Standard Deviation: 15.81


NEWSET2: COMBINED RECODE OF SETTING, LOC1-8

- 12 -


LabelValue

10.1 %1099GENERAL HOSPITAL1

5.5 %601PSYCH./OTHER(NON-VA)SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL2

11.9 %1288SOLO AND GROUP PRACTICES3

5.1 %556CRIMINAL JUSTICE4

15.2 %1646COMMUNITY MH CENTER OR OTHER MH FACILITY5

0.9 %103COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER6

4.6 %496MIXED/OTHER7

23.2 %2523OUTPATIENT8

13.3 %1442RESIDENTIAL9

6.0 %653OP & RESID10

4.2 %453COMMUNITY OR RELIGIOUS AGENCY/ORG.11

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




ADMIN: DOES FACILITY PROVIDE ADMIN SERVICES

On October 1, 1997, which of the following services were provided by this facility at this site? MARK ALL THAT APPLY Administrativeservices


LabelValue

31.1 %3382NO0

68.8 %7472YES1

Missing Data

0.1 %6MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SETTING: CATEGORY THAT BEST DESCRIBES SETTING

Which ONE category best describes the SETTING of this substance abuse treatment facility? MARK ONE

- 13 -


LabelValue

10.0 %1091GENERAL HOSPITAL1

3.4 %367PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITAL2

2.2 %242OTHER SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL3

5.7 %624SOLO PRACTICE4

6.1 %664GROUP PRACTICE5

0.7 %79SCHOOL (ELEM., SECONDARY, COLLEGE-UNIV.)6

2.5 %275JAIL, PRISON, JUVENILE DETENTION CENTER7

2.6 %281OTHER CRIMINAL JUSTICE8

66.6 %7237OTHER SETTING9

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




WAITLIST: DOES PROGRAM MAINTAIN A WAITING LIST

If a program is full, does this facility maintain a formal waiting list of people waiting for substance abuse services?


LabelValue

51.3 %5572YES1

48.2 %5237NO2

Missing Data

0.5 %51MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




WAITNUM: HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE ON WAITING LIST

On October 1, 1997, how many people were on the waiting list?


LabelValue

25.6 %2777-0

0.7 %73-1

- 14 -


LabelValue

1.3 %141-2

1.5 %167-3

1.2 %130-4

1.9 %204-5

1.2 %133-6

0.8 %88-7

1.1 %119-8

0.5 %53-9

2.2 %240-10

0.6 %66-11

0.9 %97-12

0.3 %38-13

0.4 %40-14

1.2 %125-15

0.3 %34-16

0.4 %41-17

0.4 %41-18

0.2 %18-19

1.2 %129-20

0.2 %24-21

0.2 %17-22

0.2 %21-23

0.2 %20-24

0.6 %61-25

0.1 %10-26

0.2 %19-27

0.1 %15-28

0.1 %7-29

0.6 %62-30

0.1 %13-31

0.1 %9-32

0.1 %9-33

0.0 %4-34

0.2 %20-35

0.1 %9-36

0.1 %8-37

0.1 %10-38

0.0 %5-39

0.2 %27-40

0.1 %7-41

0.1 %6-42

0.1 %6-43

- 15 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-44

0.1 %13-45

0.0 %5-46

0.0 %3-47

0.1 %7-48

0.0 %4-49

Missing Data

49.9 %5415MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





SRVC1: ASSESSMENT COMP SUB ABUSE

As of October 1, 1997, which of these services were being provided at thissubstance abuse facility? MARK ALL THAT APPLY

Assessment services - Comprehensive substance abuse assessment/diagnosis


LabelValue

6.6 %716NO0

75.9 %8242YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 16 -

SRVC2: ASSESSMENT MENTAL HLTH


Assessment services - Comprehensive mental health assessment/diagnosis


LabelValue

46.9 %5089NO0

35.6 %3869YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC3: ASSESSMENT OTHER


Assessment services - Other


LabelValue

78.4 %8513NO0

4.1 %445YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC4: THERAPY FAMILY COUNSELING

- 17 -


Therapy - Family counseling


LabelValue

22.5 %2443NO0

60.0 %6515YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC5: THERAPY GROUP


Therapy - Group therapy


LabelValue

10.0 %1086NO0

72.5 %7872YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC6: THERAPY INDIVIDUAL


- 18 -

Therapy - Individual therapy


LabelValue

5.2 %569NO0

77.2 %8389YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC7: THERAPY PHARM/PRESCRIPTION MED


Therapy - Pharmacotherapies/prescription medication


LabelValue

49.3 %5357NO0

33.2 %3601YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC8: THERAPY RELAPSE PREVENTION GRPS


Therapy - Relapse prevention groups

- 19 -


LabelValue

22.9 %2484NO0

59.6 %6474YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC9: THERAPY OTHER


Therapy - Other


LabelValue

77.4 %8411NO0

5.0 %547YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC10: TESTING BLOOD/ALCOHOL


Testing - Blood alcohol

- 20 -


LabelValue

49.9 %5419NO0

32.6 %3539YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC11: TESTING DRUG/ALC URINE SCR


Testing - Drug/alcohol urine screening


LabelValue

20.8 %2258NO0

61.7 %6700YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC12: TESTING HAIR ANALYSIS


Testing - Hair analysis

- 21 -


LabelValue

81.4 %8840NO0

1.1 %118YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC13: TESTING HEPATITIS


Testing - Hepatitis testing


LabelValue

67.0 %7273NO0

15.5 %1685YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC14: TESTING HIV


Testing - HIV testing

- 22 -


LabelValue

54.9 %5961NO0

27.6 %2997YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC15: TESTING STD


Testing - STANDARD testing


LabelValue

64.2 %6975NO0

18.3 %1983YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC16: TESTING TB SCREENING


Testing - TB screening

- 23 -


LabelValue

50.1 %5445NO0

32.3 %3513YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC17: TESTING OTHER


Testing - Other


LabelValue

80.3 %8725NO0

2.1 %233YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC18: HEALTH SERV FAMILY PLANNING


Health services - Family planning

- 24 -


LabelValue

76.7 %8330NO0

5.8 %628YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC19: HEALTH SERV MEDICAL CARE


Health services - Medical care


LabelValue

58.1 %6315NO0

24.3 %2643YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC20: HEALTH SERV PRENATAL CARE


Health services - Prenatal care

- 25 -


LabelValue

76.5 %8313NO0

5.9 %645YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC21: HEALTH SERV PERINATAL CARE


Health services - Perinatal care


LabelValue

78.6 %8531NO0

3.9 %427YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC22: HEALTH SERV TB TREATMENT


Health services - TB treatment

- 26 -


LabelValue

73.3 %7955NO0

9.2 %1003YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC23: HEALTH SERV HLTH EDUCATION


Health services - Health education


LabelValue

38.8 %4216NO0

43.7 %4742YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC24: HEALTH SERV HIV/AIDS EDUCATION


Health services - HIV/AIDS education

- 27 -


LabelValue

34.6 %3762NO0

47.8 %5196YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC25: HEALTH SERV SMOKING CESSATION


Health services - Smoking cessation


LabelValue

64.6 %7011NO0

17.9 %1947YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC26: HEALTH SERV OTHER


Health services - Other

- 28 -


LabelValue

81.2 %8822NO0

1.3 %136YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC27: CONTINUING CARE AFTERCARE COUNSEL


Continuing care - Aftercare counseling


LabelValue

22.1 %2404NO0

60.3 %6554YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC28: CONTINUING CARE ALUMNI(AE) GRPS


Continuing care - Alumni(ae) groups

- 29 -


LabelValue

62.1 %6748NO0

20.3 %2210YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC29: CONTINUING CARE OTHER


Continuing care - Other


LabelValue

81.4 %8840NO0

1.1 %118YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC31: DOES FAC PROVIDE PRGS FOR DUAL DIAGNOS


Programs for special groups - Dually-diagnosed (mental and substance abusedisorders)

- 30 -


LabelValue

51.6 %5605NO0

48.4 %5255YES1

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




SRVC35: TRANSITIONAL-ASSIST. SOCIAL SERV


Transitional services - Assistance with obtaining Social Services


LabelValue

44.9 %4881NO0

37.5 %4077YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC36: TRANSITIONAL SERV DISCHARGE PLAN


Transitional services - Discharge planning


LabelValue

20.4 %2217NO0

- 31 -


LabelValue

62.1 %6741YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC37: TRANSITIONAL SERV EMPLOYMENT


Transitional services - Employment counseling/training


LabelValue

56.6 %6145NO0

25.9 %2813YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC38: TRANSITIONAL SERV HOUSING ASSIST


Transitional services - Housing assistance


LabelValue

60.0 %6521NO0

- 32 -


LabelValue

22.4 %2437YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC39: TRANSITIONAL SERV REFERRAL


Transitional services - Referral to other services


LabelValue

14.0 %1518NO0

68.5 %7440YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC40: TRANSITIONAL SERV OTHER


Transitional services - Other


LabelValue

81.6 %8861NO0

- 33 -


LabelValue

0.9 %97YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC41: COMM OUTREACH DRUG/ALCOHOL ED


Community Outreach - Drug and alcohol education


LabelValue

29.4 %3188NO0

53.1 %5770YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC42: COMM OUTREACH EARLY INTERVENTION


Community Outreach - Outreach/early intervention


LabelValue

52.0 %5648NO0

- 34 -


LabelValue

30.5 %3310YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC43: COMM OUTREACH MEDIAL PRESENTATIONS


Community Outreach - Media presentations (T.V., radio, brochures)


LabelValue

49.1 %5336NO0

33.4 %3622YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC44: COMM OUTREACH MEMBERSHIP PROG


Community Outreach - Membership in a community partnership program


LabelValue

54.8 %5951NO0

- 35 -


LabelValue

27.7 %3007YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC45: COMM OUTREACH OTHER


Community Outreach - Other


LabelValue

81.0 %8802NO0

1.4 %156YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC46: OTHER SERV ACADEMIC ED/GED


Other Services - Academic education/GED classes


LabelValue

69.9 %7587NO0

- 36 -


LabelValue

12.6 %1371YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC47: OTHER SERV ACUPUNCTURE


Other Services - Acupuncture


LabelValue

78.5 %8528NO0

4.0 %430YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC48: OTHER SERV CASE MANAGEMENT


Other Services - Case management services


LabelValue

41.1 %4462NO0

- 37 -


LabelValue

41.4 %4496YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC49: OTHER SERV CHILD CARE


Other Services - Child care


LabelValue

74.0 %8040NO0

8.5 %918YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC50: OTHER SERV COMMUNICATION SKILL


Other Services - Communication skills


LabelValue

52.4 %5696NO0

- 38 -


LabelValue

30.0 %3262YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC51: OTHER SERV DETOXICATION


Other Services - Detoxification from substance of abuse


LabelValue

62.2 %6759NO0

20.2 %2199YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC52: OTHER SERV DOMESTIC VIOLENCE


Other Services - Domestic violence - family/partner violence services


LabelValue

58.4 %6343NO0

- 39 -


LabelValue

24.1 %2615YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC53: OTHER SERV HOME VISITS


Other Services - Home visits


LabelValue

66.7 %7247NO0

15.8 %1711YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC54: OTHER SERV LIFE SKILLS


Other Services - Life skills for independent living


LabelValue

55.0 %5976NO0

- 40 -


LabelValue

27.5 %2982YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC55: OTHER SERV OUTCOME FOLLOW-UP


Other Services - Outcome follow-up (post-discharge)


LabelValue

52.5 %5700NO0

30.0 %3258YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC56: OTHER SERV PARENTING/FAMILY


Other Services - Parenting/family skills development


LabelValue

50.8 %5521NO0

- 41 -


LabelValue

31.6 %3437YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC57: OTHER SERV SELF-HELP GRPS


Other Services - Self-help groups, including 12-step programs


LabelValue

36.2 %3929NO0

46.3 %5029YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC58: OTHER SERV SOCIALIZATION


Other Services - Socialization/recreational services


LabelValue

53.3 %5790NO0

- 42 -


LabelValue

29.2 %3168YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC59: OTHER SERV TRANSPORTATION


Other Services - Transportation assistance to treatment


LabelValue

50.5 %5482NO0

32.0 %3476YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC60: OTHER SERV OTHER


Other Services - Other


LabelValue

80.9 %8790NO0

- 43 -


LabelValue

1.5 %168YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC61: OTHER SERV WOMENS GROUPS


Other Services - Women's groups


LabelValue

80.8 %8777NO0

1.7 %181YES1

Missing Data

17.5 %1902MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




SRVC30: DOES FACILITY PROVIDE PRGS FOR ADOLES


Programs for special groups - Adolescents


LabelValue

61.4 %6665NO0

- 44 -


LabelValue

38.6 %4195YES1

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




SRVC32: DOES FACILITY PROVIDE PRGS FOR HIV/AID


Persons with HIV/AIDS


LabelValue

76.4 %8294NO0

23.6 %2566YES1

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




SRVC33: DOES FAC PROVIDE PRGS FOR PREG OR POST


Pregnant/Postpartum women


LabelValue

79.7 %8660NO0

20.3 %2200YES1

Missing Data

- 45 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total




SRVC34: DOES FAC PROVIDE OTHER SPECIAL GROUPS


Programs for special groups - Other


LabelValue

90.7 %9845NO0

9.3 %1015YES1

Missing Data

100%10,860Total




METLAAM: DOES FACILITY DISPENSE METH OR LAAM

Does this facility dispense the opioid substitutes methadone or LAAM at this site?


LabelValue

7.9 %856YES1

90.8 %9861NO2

Missing Data

1.3 %143MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 46 -


CLIEST: IS CLIENT TOTAL ACTUAL OR ESTIMATE

Are the numbers entered in the TOTAL box Q.12g actual active client counts for October 1, 1997. or you best estimate?


LabelValue

62.4 %6779ACTUAL COUNT1

33.0 %3585ESTIMATE2

Missing Data

4.6 %496MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




HOSPRES: HOSP INP OR RESID 24 > 0

Did you enter a number larger than zero in either the Hospital Inpatient (Q.12a or Q.12b) or Residential 24 Hour Care (Q.12c or Q12.d)categories in Q.12?


LabelValue

35.4 %3849YES1

Missing Data

64.6 %7011MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




DEMOGEST: ARE NUMBERS ACTUAL COUNTS OR ESTIMATES

Are the numbers entered in Q.15 actual active client counts for October 1, 1997, or your best estimate?


LabelValue

44.8 %4860ACTUAL ACTIVE CLIENT COUNTS1

39.0 %4234ESTIMATE2

- 47 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

16.3 %1766MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




METNUM: HOW MANY WERE RECEIVING METHADONE

On October 1, 1997, approximately how many of the clients were receiving: a. Methadone at this site


LabelValue

0.6 %68-0

0.2 %26-1

0.2 %25-2

0.2 %18-3

0.1 %12-4

0.1 %11-5

0.1 %6-6

0.0 %5-7

0.1 %7-8

0.0 %4-9

0.1 %7-10

0.0 %4-11

0.1 %6-12

0.0 %4-14

0.0 %3-15

0.0 %3-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %2-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %10-20

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %2-29

- 48 -


LabelValue

0.1 %6-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.1 %6-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %5-37

0.0 %2-38

0.1 %7-40

0.1 %6-41

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %4-45

0.0 %1-47

0.1 %6-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %2-55

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %4-58

Missing Data

92.3 %10026MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 162.71• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 2187• Standard Deviation: 183.58


LAAMNUM: HOW MANY WERE RECEIVING LAAM

On October 1, 1997, approximately how many of the clients were receiving: b. LAAM at this site

- 49 -


LabelValue

6.1 %667-0

0.0 %2-1

0.1 %7-2

0.1 %8-3

0.0 %2-4

0.1 %12-5

0.1 %7-6

0.1 %11-7

0.0 %4-8

0.0 %3-9

0.0 %3-10

0.0 %2-12

0.1 %6-15

0.0 %3-16

0.1 %7-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %2-73

0.0 %1-110

0.0 %1-132

0.0 %1-146

0.0 %1-285

Missing Data

92.9 %10084MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 50 -




PREGNUM: NUMBER OF CLIENTS PREGNANT

On October 1, 1997, about how many of the clients recorded in the TOTAL boxat Q.12g were:

a. Pregnant


LabelValue

16.0 %1733-0

12.2 %1326-1

6.4 %699-2

2.9 %316-3

1.7 %190-4

1.5 %168-5

0.8 %83-6

0.5 %54-7

0.7 %72-8

0.3 %28-9

0.6 %60-10

0.2 %26-11

0.1 %13-12

0.1 %15-13

0.2 %17-14

0.2 %21-15

0.1 %7-16

0.0 %4-17

0.0 %5-18

0.0 %4-19

0.2 %19-20

0.1 %7-21

0.0 %5-22

0.0 %4-23

0.1 %6-24

- 51 -


LabelValue

0.1 %6-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %4-27

0.1 %6-28

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %5-32

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %2-38

0.0 %2-39

0.1 %7-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %2-50

0.0 %2-54

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %2-57

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-76

Missing Data

54.4 %5909MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





DEPNUM: NO. OF WOMEN W/ DEPENDENT CHILDREN

- 52 -


b. Women with dependent children


LabelValue

6.5 %702-0

6.8 %743-1

6.2 %673-2

4.9 %531-3

4.1 %444-4

3.8 %412-5

3.0 %328-6

2.0 %218-7

2.2 %240-8

1.3 %141-9

2.6 %282-10

1.0 %108-11

1.4 %155-12

1.0 %111-13

1.1 %120-14

1.7 %188-15

0.8 %83-16

0.7 %81-17

0.8 %91-18

0.6 %62-19

1.5 %159-20

0.5 %55-21

0.5 %52-22

0.4 %44-23

0.4 %48-24

0.9 %102-25

0.3 %34-26

0.3 %36-27

0.5 %55-28

0.3 %37-29

0.9 %96-30

0.2 %23-31

0.3 %30-32

0.2 %19-33

0.2 %27-34

0.5 %49-35

0.2 %19-36

- 53 -


LabelValue

0.2 %18-37

0.2 %27-38

0.2 %21-39

0.6 %69-40

0.1 %13-41

0.2 %26-42

0.1 %13-43

0.1 %13-44

0.3 %32-45

0.1 %14-46

0.1 %12-47

0.2 %24-48

0.1 %9-49

Missing Data

31.0 %3364MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





INJNUM: NUMBER OF INJECTION DRUG USERS


c. Injection drugs users at the time of admission


LabelValue

9.3 %1011-0

8.5 %921-1

6.6 %713-2

4.8 %518-3

3.0 %323-4

- 54 -


LabelValue

3.1 %336-5

1.9 %201-6

1.2 %132-7

1.4 %148-8

0.9 %100-9

2.0 %222-10

0.6 %69-11

0.8 %90-12

0.4 %43-13

0.5 %59-14

1.0 %104-15

0.4 %43-16

0.3 %34-17

0.3 %37-18

0.2 %22-19

0.7 %76-20

0.2 %26-21

0.2 %24-22

0.2 %25-23

0.2 %21-24

0.4 %48-25

0.1 %12-26

0.2 %22-27

0.1 %16-28

0.1 %15-29

0.4 %45-30

0.1 %11-31

0.1 %14-32

0.1 %14-33

0.1 %10-34

0.2 %24-35

0.1 %7-36

0.1 %9-37

0.1 %9-38

0.0 %2-39

0.3 %32-40

0.1 %15-41

0.1 %10-42

0.1 %9-43

0.1 %7-44

0.1 %9-45

0.1 %7-46

- 55 -


LabelValue

0.1 %7-47

0.1 %9-48

0.0 %5-49

Missing Data

41.5 %4511MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





TBNUM: NO. OF CLIENTS WITH TUBERCULOSIS


d. Known as having an active case of tuberculosis (TB)


LabelValue

19.3 %2100-0

3.6 %388-1

1.7 %189-2

0.9 %101-3

0.5 %49-4

0.5 %51-5

0.2 %22-6

0.1 %13-7

0.2 %18-8

0.1 %12-9

0.1 %9-10

0.0 %3-11

0.1 %6-12

0.0 %3-13

0.0 %4-14

0.0 %4-15

- 56 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %3-18

0.0 %3-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %4-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %2-49

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-69

0.0 %1-82

0.0 %1-95

0.0 %1-180

0.0 %1-432

0.0 %1-644

Missing Data

72.2 %7838MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 57 -


HIVNUM: NUMBER OF CLIENTS WITH HIV


e. HIV positive


LabelValue

12.3 %1334-0

9.2 %1004-1

5.2 %570-2

2.8 %304-3

1.7 %185-4

1.5 %166-5

1.0 %110-6

0.5 %51-7

0.6 %67-8

0.3 %33-9

0.8 %89-10

0.2 %24-11

0.4 %40-12

0.1 %15-13

0.2 %24-14

0.4 %43-15

0.1 %15-16

0.1 %8-17

0.1 %15-18

0.1 %10-19

0.3 %29-20

0.1 %11-21

0.1 %14-22

0.1 %6-23

0.1 %6-24

0.2 %19-25

0.0 %5-26

0.0 %5-27

0.1 %9-28

0.0 %5-29

0.1 %12-30

0.0 %3-31

- 58 -


LabelValue

0.1 %10-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %3-34

0.1 %11-35

0.0 %5-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %4-38

0.0 %3-39

0.1 %10-40

0.0 %5-41

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %3-43

0.0 %2-44

0.1 %6-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %5-47

0.0 %4-48

0.1 %7-50

Missing Data

58.8 %6383MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





PREVNUM: NO. OF CLIENTS WHO PREVIOUSLY RECD TX


f. Clients who had previously received substance abuse treatment from you oranother facility

- 59 -


LabelValue

1.8 %194-0

3.2 %347-1

4.2 %458-2

3.8 %408-3

3.7 %398-4

3.6 %396-5

2.9 %311-6

2.1 %233-7

2.6 %287-8

1.8 %191-9

3.5 %378-10

1.5 %165-11

2.4 %265-12

1.4 %155-13

1.6 %177-14

2.0 %222-15

1.3 %137-16

0.9 %93-17

1.4 %152-18

0.8 %88-19

2.2 %235-20

0.7 %77-21

0.8 %87-22

0.7 %78-23

0.9 %94-24

1.5 %158-25

0.7 %72-26

0.6 %60-27

0.7 %72-28

0.4 %41-29

1.5 %168-30

0.5 %49-31

0.6 %65-32

0.4 %41-33

0.4 %48-34

0.8 %83-35

0.4 %39-36

0.3 %35-37

0.6 %63-38

0.2 %26-39

1.1 %115-40

0.3 %34-41

- 60 -


LabelValue

0.3 %28-42

0.2 %22-43

0.2 %19-44

0.7 %78-45

0.3 %34-46

0.2 %18-47

0.3 %28-48

0.3 %33-49

Missing Data

16.7 %1811MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





MGDNUM: NO. OF CLIENTS COVERED BY MANAGED CARE


g. Covered by managed care arrangements


LabelValue

11.3 %1224-0

4.0 %432-1

3.5 %378-2

2.9 %312-3

2.1 %233-4

2.3 %250-5

1.7 %190-6

1.2 %128-7

1.2 %133-8

0.8 %82-9

1.8 %199-10

- 61 -


LabelValue

0.6 %64-11

0.8 %89-12

0.6 %62-13

0.5 %58-14

1.2 %133-15

0.4 %47-16

0.4 %48-17

0.6 %61-18

0.4 %48-19

0.9 %102-20

0.4 %43-21

0.3 %33-22

0.3 %30-23

0.3 %29-24

0.6 %69-25

0.2 %21-26

0.3 %29-27

0.3 %28-28

0.2 %21-29

0.6 %66-30

0.1 %14-31

0.2 %26-32

0.1 %15-33

0.1 %12-34

0.3 %35-35

0.2 %22-36

0.2 %20-37

0.2 %22-38

0.1 %9-39

0.5 %53-40

0.1 %11-41

0.1 %14-42

0.1 %11-43

0.2 %22-44

0.2 %26-45

0.0 %5-46

0.1 %16-47

0.1 %10-48

0.1 %7-49

Missing Data

48.2 %5233MISSING-9

- 62 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





CJNUM: NO. OF COURT REFERRED CLIENTS


h. Criminal justice referred clients (excluding DUI/DWI)


LabelValue

5.9 %638-0

5.1 %553-1

5.7 %615-2

4.2 %459-3

3.4 %364-4

3.2 %346-5

2.6 %277-6

1.9 %211-7

2.2 %240-8

1.5 %161-9

2.9 %310-10

1.2 %133-11

1.4 %150-12

0.8 %92-13

1.1 %123-14

1.9 %201-15

0.8 %86-16

0.7 %81-17

0.9 %102-18

0.7 %76-19

- 63 -


LabelValue

1.7 %182-20

0.4 %45-21

0.6 %67-22

0.6 %69-23

0.5 %52-24

1.0 %104-25

0.5 %54-26

0.4 %46-27

0.4 %47-28

0.4 %44-29

1.2 %125-30

0.3 %36-31

0.4 %46-32

0.3 %38-33

0.3 %36-34

0.8 %82-35

0.3 %29-36

0.3 %30-37

0.3 %35-38

0.2 %19-39

0.8 %85-40

0.2 %21-41

0.3 %30-42

0.2 %23-43

0.2 %18-44

0.4 %44-45

0.2 %26-46

0.2 %25-47

0.3 %32-48

0.2 %22-49

Missing Data

25.9 %2813MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





- 64 -


PARENT: IS FACILITY A PARENT ORGANIZATION

On October 1, 1997, was this facility structured as a parent organization or master site with one or more affiliate sites that providesubstance abuse treatment services?


LabelValue

23.2 %2516YES1

76.4 %8294NO2

Missing Data

0.5 %50MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




NUMSUBS: IF PARENT ORG., HOW MANY AFFILIATES?

On October 1, 1997, how many affiliate sites did this facility have that provide substance abuse treatment services?


LabelValue

0.2 %22-0

7.7 %839-1

5.7 %616-2

3.2 %350-3

2.2 %234-4

1.3 %136-5

0.8 %89-6

0.4 %46-7

0.2 %20-8

0.2 %17-9

0.2 %24-10

0.1 %10-11

0.1 %9-12

0.0 %4-13

0.0 %2-14

0.2 %21-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %1-17

0.1 %7-18

- 65 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %5-22

0.0 %4-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-93

0.0 %1-280

0.0 %1-400

Missing Data

77.1 %8372MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




ADMINLNK: IS FACILITY AN AFFILIATE ORGANIZATION

On October 1, 1997, was this facility an affiliate of a parent organization or master site?


LabelValue

42.1 %4577YES1

57.1 %6198NO2

Missing Data

- 66 -


LabelValue

0.8 %85MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OTHFAC: CAN YOU RESPOND FOR THIS SITE ONLY

Can you respond for only the services, activities, etc., provided at this site?


LabelValue

94.2 %10231YES1

5.5 %595NO2

Missing Data

0.3 %34MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OTHNUM: HOW MANY SITES ARE YOU REPORTING FOR

If responding for only this site is not possible, for approximately how many sites will you be reporting in total?


LabelValue

2.3 %2522 SITES1

2.2 %2433-5 SITES2

0.7 %796-10 SITES3

0.1 %15MORE THAN 10 SITES4

Missing Data

94.6 %10271MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 67 -


T_CLI1: NUMBER OF HOSPITAL INPATIENTS-DETOX

In each of the categories listed below, please enter the number of activeclients who were receiving substance abuse treatment at this facility onOctober 1, 1997.

DO NOT count codependents, parents, other relatives, friends (i.e.,"collaterals"), or other nontreatment clients.

a. Hospital inpatient - Detoxification (on October 1, 1997 and were NOTdischarged that day)


LabelValue

91.1 %9898-0

1.3 %136-1

1.4 %156-2

1.0 %105-3

0.8 %91-4

0.9 %93-5

0.5 %51-6

0.3 %29-7

0.4 %39-8

0.2 %22-9

0.4 %41-10

0.1 %8-11

0.2 %25-12

0.1 %8-13

0.1 %9-14

0.2 %19-15

0.0 %4-16

0.0 %4-17

0.0 %5-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %7-20

0.0 %2-21

0.1 %7-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %1-27

- 68 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %2-64

0.0 %1-67

0.0 %1-100

0.0 %2-200

0.0 %1-253

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_CLI2: NUMBER OF HOSPITAL INPATIENTS-REHAB

In each of the categories listed below, please enter the number of activeclients who were receiving substance abuse treatment at this facility on

- 69 -

October 1, 1997.


b. Hospital inpatient - Rehabilitation (on October 1, 1997 and were NOTdischarged that day)


LabelValue

94.2 %10229-0

0.6 %63-1

0.8 %82-2

0.4 %40-3

0.4 %39-4

0.3 %36-5

0.2 %27-6

0.1 %11-7

0.3 %32-8

0.1 %12-9

0.3 %31-10

0.1 %11-11

0.2 %18-12

0.1 %8-13

0.1 %12-14

0.1 %11-15

0.1 %12-16

0.0 %4-17

0.1 %11-18

0.0 %5-19

0.1 %8-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %3-23

0.1 %13-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %3-26

0.1 %9-27

0.0 %4-28

0.0 %3-29

0.1 %8-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %3-34

0.0 %4-35

- 70 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %5-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-55

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





HOSPBED: NO. OF BEDS AVAIL FOR HOSPITAL INPT.

On October 1, 1997 how many of the beds at this facility could have been used for: a. Hospital inpatient substance abuse treatment


LabelValue

0.0 %5-1

0.1 %10-2

0.0 %5-3

0.3 %35-4

0.3 %31-5

0.3 %37-6

- 71 -


LabelValue

0.1 %11-7

0.4 %41-8

0.1 %6-9

0.7 %74-10

0.1 %12-11

0.5 %49-12

0.1 %9-13

0.2 %21-14

0.3 %36-15

0.5 %56-16

0.1 %11-17

0.3 %32-18

0.1 %10-19

0.7 %81-20

0.1 %10-21

0.2 %24-22

0.1 %9-23

0.3 %38-24

0.1 %11-25

0.1 %16-26

0.1 %6-27

0.1 %16-28

0.1 %8-29

0.3 %36-30

0.0 %5-31

0.1 %13-32

0.0 %5-33

0.1 %9-34

0.1 %7-35

0.1 %12-36

0.0 %2-37

0.1 %6-38

0.0 %2-39

0.2 %22-40

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %5-44

0.0 %4-45

0.0 %5-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %4-48

0.0 %3-49

- 72 -


LabelValue

0.1 %10-50

0.0 %4-53

Missing Data

91.3 %9912MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





H_AGE1: HOSP INP CLIENTS UNDER 18 YEARS OLD

Please complete the following table for the number of active clients reportedin Q.12 (page 4).

Enter the TOTAL from Q.12g into the three TOTAL boxes in Column 1 below.

Column 1. Enter the number of active clients for each age, race, and sexcategory in Column 1. For each category with no clients, enter zero, "0"

Columns 2-4. For each age, race, and sex category with a number greater thanzero in Column 1 complete Columns 2-4 to show how many clients were in each ofthe three types of care. The SUM of each ROW in Columns 2, 3, and 4 MUSTEQUAL the Column 1 total for that row.

Hospital inpatient clients, under 18 years


LabelValue

97.7 %10609-0

0.6 %65-1

0.4 %48-2

0.2 %19-3

0.1 %16-4

0.1 %9-5

0.1 %8-6

0.0 %5-7

- 73 -


LabelValue

0.0 %5-8

0.0 %1-9

0.0 %4-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %2-12

0.0 %1-13

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %1-15

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-63

0.0 %1-78

0.0 %1-91

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_AGE2: HOSP INP CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 18 - 20




Columns 2-4. For each age, race, and sex category with a number greater than

- 74 -

zero in Column 1 complete Columns 2-4 to show how many clients were in each ofthe three types of care. The SUM of each ROW in Columns 2, 3, and 4 MUSTEQUAL the Column 1 total for that row.

Hospital inpatient clients, age 18-20


LabelValue

96.9 %10521-0

1.2 %134-1

0.7 %73-2

0.2 %27-3

0.1 %15-4

0.1 %12-5

0.0 %4-6

0.0 %4-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %2-9

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %3-20

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-100

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_AGE3: HOSP INP CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 21 - 24


- 75 -






LabelValue

95.7 %10398-0

1.7 %181-1

0.9 %93-2

0.4 %42-3

0.2 %21-4

0.2 %19-5

0.1 %11-6

0.1 %12-7

0.0 %4-8

0.0 %5-9

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %4-12

0.0 %2-14

0.0 %2-15

0.0 %3-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %2-20

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-79

0.0 %1-82

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total


• Mean: 0.13• Median: 0.00• Mode: 0.00• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 82

- 76 -

• Standard Deviation: 1.46


H_AGE4: HOSP INP CLIENTS AGE 25-34 YEARS







LabelValue

93.0 %10100-0

1.6 %175-1

1.4 %150-2

0.9 %101-3

0.6 %63-4

0.5 %50-5

0.3 %28-6

0.2 %20-7

0.2 %17-8

0.1 %12-9

0.1 %11-10

0.1 %8-11

0.1 %10-12

0.0 %5-14

0.1 %7-15

0.1 %8-16

0.0 %3-17

0.0 %5-18

0.0 %1-19

0.1 %7-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %1-23

- 77 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-79

0.0 %1-80

0.0 %1-100

0.0 %1-223

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total









- 78 -



LabelValue

91.5 %9934-0

2.0 %215-1

1.4 %157-2

1.1 %117-3

0.7 %76-4

0.5 %56-5

0.5 %51-6

0.3 %34-7

0.3 %29-8

0.1 %14-9

0.2 %17-10

0.2 %17-11

0.1 %8-12

0.0 %5-13

0.1 %11-14

0.0 %5-15

0.1 %11-16

0.1 %6-17

0.0 %4-18

0.0 %2-19

0.0 %5-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %3-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-64

0.0 %1-69

0.0 %1-72

0.0 %1-128

0.0 %1-341

- 79 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-433

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total











LabelValue

93.5 %10158-0

2.0 %214-1

1.3 %139-2

0.8 %84-3

0.4 %42-4

0.3 %36-5

0.3 %35-6

0.1 %14-7

0.1 %14-8

0.1 %12-9

0.1 %9-10

- 80 -


LabelValue

0.1 %7-11

0.0 %4-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %3-14

0.0 %4-15

0.1 %6-16

0.1 %7-17

0.0 %3-18

0.0 %3-19

0.0 %2-20

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-75

0.0 %1-92

0.0 %1-209

0.0 %1-367

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_AGE7: HOSP INP CLIENTS AGE 65 AND OVER




Columns 2-4. For each age, race, and sex category with a number greater than

- 81 -

zero in Column 1 complete Columns 2-4 to show how many clients were in each ofthe three types of care. The SUM of each ROW in Columns 2, 3, and 4 MUSTEQUAL the Column 1 total for that row.

Hospital inpatient clients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

97.7 %10611-0

1.2 %133-1

0.3 %35-2

0.1 %13-3

0.0 %3-4

0.0 %3-5

0.0 %2-6

0.0 %1-7

0.0 %1-8

0.0 %2-9

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-40

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_AGE9: HOSP INP CLIENTS AGE TOTAL




Columns 2-4. For each age, race, and sex category with a number greater thanzero in Column 1 complete Columns 2-4 to show how many clients were in each of

- 82 -

the three types of care. The SUM of each ROW in Columns 2, 3, and 4 MUSTEQUAL the Column 1 total for that row.

Hospital inpatient clients, (age subtotal)


LabelValue

89.5 %9719-0

0.8 %92-1

1.3 %139-2

0.8 %85-3

0.7 %79-4

0.7 %81-5

0.6 %64-6

0.4 %40-7

0.4 %46-8

0.2 %26-9

0.5 %52-10

0.2 %19-11

0.3 %37-12

0.2 %21-13

0.2 %24-14

0.3 %30-15

0.2 %18-16

0.2 %17-17

0.1 %16-18

0.1 %8-19

0.2 %18-20

0.0 %5-21

0.1 %10-22

0.1 %6-23

0.1 %13-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %4-26

0.1 %10-27

0.1 %9-28

0.1 %6-29

0.1 %8-30

0.0 %4-31

0.1 %8-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %3-36

- 83 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %4-38

0.0 %2-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %4-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %2-49

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





H_RE1: HOSP INP CLIENTS/WHITE





- 84 -

Hospital inpatient clients, white (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

90.7 %9850-0

1.0 %111-1

1.9 %205-2

1.1 %116-3

0.7 %74-4

0.6 %61-5

0.7 %77-6

0.4 %45-7

0.3 %38-8

0.2 %23-9

0.3 %34-10

0.2 %20-11

0.2 %20-12

0.1 %11-13

0.1 %11-14

0.1 %10-15

0.1 %9-16

0.1 %8-17

0.1 %7-18

0.1 %10-19

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %4-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %4-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %3-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %4-28

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-45

- 85 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-58

0.0 %1-66

0.0 %1-71

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





H_RE2: HOSP INP CLIENTS/BLACK





Hospital inpatient clients, black (not of Hispanic origin)

- 86 -


LabelValue

93.2 %10123-0

1.4 %155-1

1.0 %104-2

0.5 %55-3

0.6 %63-4

0.4 %46-5

0.3 %37-6

0.2 %21-7

0.2 %27-8

0.2 %18-9

0.2 %20-10

0.1 %10-11

0.1 %12-12

0.1 %9-13

0.1 %13-14

0.1 %8-15

0.1 %11-16

0.1 %6-17

0.1 %7-18

0.0 %2-19

0.1 %7-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %4-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %3-25

0.0 %5-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %2-48

- 87 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-70

0.0 %1-75

0.0 %1-156

0.0 %1-165

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





H_RE3: HOSP INP CLIENTS/HISPANIC





Hospital inpatient clients, Hispanic


LabelValue

96.2 %10445-0

1.2 %131-1

- 88 -


LabelValue

0.8 %87-2

0.4 %41-3

0.3 %35-4

0.2 %17-5

0.1 %9-6

0.1 %7-7

0.0 %5-8

0.1 %6-9

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %3-12

0.0 %3-14

0.0 %1-15

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %1-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-97

0.0 %1-134

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_RE4: HOSP INP CLIENTS ASIAN OR PACIFIC

- 89 -





Hospital inpatient clients, Asian or Pacific Islander


LabelValue

99.2 %10773-0

0.2 %18-1

0.1 %7-2

0.0 %2-3

0.0 %3-4

0.0 %2-5

0.0 %1-10

0.0 %1-11

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_RE5: HOSP INP CLIENTS AMERICAN INDIAN/A.N.




- 90 -


Hospital inpatient clients, American Indian/Alaskan Native


LabelValue

98.5 %10699-0

0.6 %68-1

0.2 %20-2

0.0 %5-3

0.0 %4-4

0.0 %3-5

0.0 %1-6

0.0 %2-12

0.0 %1-19

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-48

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_RE6: HOSP INP CLIENTS OF OTHER RACE/ETHNIC




- 91 -


Hospital inpatient clients, other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

99.1 %10761-0

0.2 %19-1

0.1 %12-2

0.0 %4-3

0.0 %2-4

0.0 %2-5

0.0 %1-6

0.0 %1-8

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %1-20

0.0 %1-67

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_RE8: HOSP INP CLIENTS RACE/ETHNIC TOTAL




Columns 2-4. For each age, race, and sex category with a number greater thanzero in Column 1 complete Columns 2-4 to show how many clients were in each ofthe three types of care. The SUM of each ROW in Columns 2, 3, and 4 MUST

- 92 -

EQUAL the Column 1 total for that row.

Hospital inpatient clients (race/ethnicity subtotal)


LabelValue

89.5 %9719-0

0.8 %92-1

1.3 %139-2

0.8 %85-3

0.7 %79-4

0.7 %81-5

0.6 %64-6

0.4 %40-7

0.4 %46-8

0.2 %26-9

0.5 %52-10

0.2 %19-11

0.3 %37-12

0.2 %21-13

0.2 %24-14

0.3 %30-15

0.2 %18-16

0.2 %17-17

0.1 %16-18

0.1 %8-19

0.2 %18-20

0.0 %5-21

0.1 %10-22

0.1 %6-23

0.1 %13-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %4-26

0.1 %10-27

0.1 %9-28

0.1 %6-29

0.1 %8-30

0.0 %4-31

0.1 %8-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %3-36

0.0 %1-37

- 93 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-38

0.0 %2-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %4-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %2-49

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





H_SEX1: HOSP INP MALE CLIENTS





Hospital inpatient clients, male

- 94 -


LabelValue

89.8 %9750-0

1.3 %142-1

1.3 %136-2

1.3 %143-3

1.0 %106-4

0.6 %64-5

0.5 %54-6

0.4 %41-7

0.4 %45-8

0.3 %30-9

0.3 %29-10

0.2 %23-11

0.2 %26-12

0.1 %13-13

0.1 %16-14

0.2 %21-15

0.1 %12-16

0.1 %12-17

0.1 %14-18

0.1 %12-19

0.1 %12-20

0.0 %3-21

0.1 %10-22

0.0 %5-23

0.0 %5-24

0.0 %3-25

0.0 %5-26

0.0 %5-27

0.0 %4-28

0.0 %3-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %5-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %3-36

0.0 %4-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %3-39

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %3-43

- 95 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %2-50

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-58

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





H_SEX2: HOSP INP FEMALE CLIENTS





Hospital inpatient clients, female


LabelValue

92.1 %9999-0

2.0 %217-1

- 96 -


LabelValue

1.3 %138-2

1.0 %108-3

0.5 %58-4

0.7 %71-5

0.4 %48-6

0.2 %24-7

0.1 %16-8

0.1 %10-9

0.2 %19-10

0.1 %8-11

0.1 %11-12

0.1 %7-13

0.1 %6-14

0.1 %8-15

0.1 %6-16

0.0 %2-17

0.1 %6-18

0.0 %3-19

0.1 %6-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %3-22

0.0 %1-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %4-28

0.0 %2-29

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %1-65

0.0 %1-96

0.0 %1-120

0.0 %1-154

0.0 %1-183

0.0 %1-332

- 97 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-367

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




H_SEX4: HOSP INP CLIENTS GENDER TOTAL





Hospital inpatient clients (sex subtotal)


LabelValue

89.5 %9719-0

0.8 %92-1

1.3 %139-2

0.8 %85-3

0.7 %79-4

0.7 %81-5

0.6 %64-6

0.4 %40-7

0.4 %46-8

0.2 %26-9

0.5 %52-10

- 98 -


LabelValue

0.2 %19-11

0.3 %37-12

0.2 %21-13

0.2 %24-14

0.3 %30-15

0.2 %18-16

0.2 %17-17

0.1 %16-18

0.1 %8-19

0.2 %18-20

0.0 %5-21

0.1 %10-22

0.1 %6-23

0.1 %13-24

0.0 %4-25

0.0 %4-26

0.1 %10-27

0.1 %9-28

0.1 %6-29

0.1 %8-30

0.0 %4-31

0.1 %8-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %3-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %4-38

0.0 %2-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %4-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %2-49

0.0 %5-50

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

- 99 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





T_CLI3: NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL-DETOX PATIENTS



c. Residential (24-hour care) - Detoxification (on October 1, 1997 and wereNOT discharged that day)


LabelValue

93.2 %10117-0

0.6 %66-1

0.8 %89-2

0.6 %63-3

0.4 %48-4

0.4 %41-5

0.4 %43-6

0.4 %40-7

0.3 %28-8

0.2 %19-9

0.2 %22-10

0.2 %19-11

0.2 %22-12

0.0 %4-13

0.1 %15-14

0.1 %13-15

- 100 -


LabelValue

0.1 %13-16

0.1 %9-17

0.1 %11-18

0.1 %9-19

0.2 %20-20

0.1 %8-21

0.1 %6-22

0.0 %5-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %5-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %4-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %5-29

0.1 %9-30

0.1 %6-31

0.1 %6-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %5-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %1-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-59

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-65

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 0.78

- 101 -

• Median: 0.00• Mode: 0.00• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 963• Standard Deviation: 10.40


T_CLI4: NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL-REHAB PATIENTS



d. Residential (24-hour care) - Rehabilitation (on October 1, 1997 and wereNOT discharged that day)


LabelValue

74.1 %8050-0

0.3 %29-1

0.4 %41-2

0.3 %32-3

0.4 %48-4

0.7 %77-5

1.1 %117-6

0.7 %77-7

1.0 %107-8

0.5 %57-9

1.0 %112-10

0.5 %59-11

1.3 %137-12

0.7 %73-13

1.1 %115-14

0.9 %94-15

1.1 %116-16

0.5 %55-17

0.8 %90-18

0.5 %49-19

0.8 %85-20

0.5 %53-21

0.5 %52-22

0.3 %36-23

- 102 -


LabelValue

0.5 %59-24

0.5 %54-25

0.2 %27-26

0.3 %31-27

0.4 %42-28

0.2 %24-29

0.3 %32-30

0.2 %18-31

0.3 %29-32

0.2 %23-33

0.1 %15-34

0.4 %44-35

0.2 %23-36

0.2 %18-37

0.2 %17-38

0.1 %12-39

0.4 %39-40

0.1 %9-41

0.2 %17-42

0.1 %13-43

0.1 %13-44

0.2 %25-45

0.1 %13-46

0.1 %15-47

0.1 %16-48

0.1 %8-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





- 103 -

RESBED: NO. OF BEDS AVAIL FOR NON-HOSPITAL RES

On October 1, 1997 how many of the beds at this facility could have been used for: b. Non-hospital residential (24-hour) substanceabuse treatment


LabelValue

0.0 %2-1

0.1 %6-2

0.1 %10-3

0.1 %16-4

0.2 %17-5

0.8 %89-6

0.2 %25-7

0.9 %95-8

0.3 %36-9

0.9 %96-10

0.3 %31-11

1.4 %147-12

0.4 %41-13

1.0 %105-14

0.8 %92-15

1.2 %127-16

0.4 %40-17

0.7 %78-18

0.2 %25-19

1.4 %153-20

0.4 %42-21

0.5 %56-22

0.3 %29-23

0.8 %85-24

0.5 %54-25

0.4 %41-26

0.2 %20-27

0.4 %39-28

0.1 %14-29

0.8 %90-30

0.1 %13-31

0.4 %48-32

0.2 %18-33

0.2 %20-34

0.3 %36-35

0.3 %33-36

0.1 %13-37

0.2 %22-38

- 104 -


LabelValue

0.0 %5-39

0.8 %84-40

0.1 %12-41

0.2 %25-42

0.1 %6-43

0.2 %18-44

0.2 %25-45

0.1 %15-46

0.1 %11-47

0.2 %20-48

0.1 %9-49

0.5 %51-50

Missing Data

75.3 %8177MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_AGE1: RESID 24 CLIENTS UNDER 18 YEARS OLD





Residential clients, under 18 years

- 105 -


LabelValue

93.3 %10130-0

1.2 %130-1

0.6 %64-2

0.3 %38-3

0.3 %29-4

0.3 %31-5

0.2 %23-6

0.2 %22-7

0.2 %17-8

0.1 %16-9

0.2 %18-10

0.2 %17-11

0.2 %21-12

0.1 %15-13

0.2 %25-14

0.1 %14-15

0.1 %14-16

0.1 %16-17

0.1 %12-18

0.1 %6-19

0.2 %19-20

0.1 %13-21

0.1 %6-22

0.1 %8-23

0.1 %8-24

0.1 %6-25

0.0 %5-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %5-28

0.0 %4-29

0.1 %8-30

0.1 %6-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %4-36

0.0 %3-37

0.0 %4-38

0.0 %4-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %4-46

- 106 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-48

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-67

0.0 %2-74

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_AGE2: RESID 24 CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 18 - 20





Residential clients, age 18-20


LabelValue

85.9 %9334-0

4.9 %533-1

- 107 -


LabelValue

3.5 %379-2

1.5 %160-3

1.0 %110-4

0.7 %71-5

0.4 %44-6

0.2 %18-7

0.1 %12-8

0.2 %19-9

0.2 %18-10

0.1 %9-11

0.1 %9-12

0.1 %6-13

0.1 %8-14

0.1 %10-15

0.0 %3-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %5-18

0.1 %10-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %1-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %5-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %2-51

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-55

- 108 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %2-70

0.0 %1-78

0.0 %1-80

0.0 %1-90

0.0 %1-125

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_AGE3: RESID 24 CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 21 - 24







LabelValue

81.4 %8843-0

4.6 %501-1

4.0 %433-2

2.2 %240-3

- 109 -


LabelValue

1.6 %172-4

1.4 %154-5

0.9 %93-6

0.6 %69-7

0.5 %54-8

0.2 %23-9

0.4 %47-10

0.1 %13-11

0.1 %14-12

0.1 %8-13

0.1 %7-14

0.1 %16-15

0.1 %11-16

0.1 %8-17

0.1 %7-18

0.1 %6-19

0.1 %15-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %4-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %5-25

0.0 %4-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %2-29

0.1 %6-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %2-55

- 110 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-60

0.0 %1-61

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-65

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_AGE4: RESID 24 CLIENTS AGE 25-34 YEARS







LabelValue

76.3 %8281-0

1.4 %154-1

1.9 %208-2

1.9 %211-3

1.6 %175-4

1.7 %186-5

- 111 -


LabelValue

1.6 %179-6

1.3 %136-7

1.3 %140-8

1.1 %122-9

1.4 %157-10

0.7 %80-11

0.6 %60-12

0.6 %64-13

0.4 %41-14

0.7 %74-15

0.5 %49-16

0.3 %36-17

0.2 %18-18

0.3 %37-19

0.3 %37-20

0.2 %18-21

0.2 %19-22

0.2 %23-23

0.2 %17-24

0.3 %34-25

0.1 %16-26

0.1 %13-27

0.1 %8-28

0.1 %11-29

0.2 %20-30

0.1 %10-31

0.1 %6-32

0.0 %5-33

0.0 %5-34

0.0 %5-35

0.0 %5-36

0.1 %6-37

0.0 %5-38

0.0 %5-39

0.1 %7-40

0.0 %5-41

0.0 %5-42

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %2-44

0.1 %10-45

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %2-48

- 112 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %5-51

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total












LabelValue

76.9 %8349-0

2.2 %238-1

2.4 %263-2

2.3 %255-3

2.2 %244-4

1.6 %174-5

1.4 %150-6

1.0 %110-7

- 113 -


LabelValue

1.1 %117-8

1.0 %108-9

1.0 %104-10

0.6 %69-11

0.5 %57-12

0.5 %55-13

0.3 %38-14

0.5 %52-15

0.4 %39-16

0.2 %27-17

0.3 %33-18

0.3 %35-19

0.2 %26-20

0.2 %21-21

0.1 %16-22

0.1 %12-23

0.1 %9-24

0.2 %21-25

0.1 %6-26

0.0 %4-27

0.1 %14-28

0.0 %3-29

0.1 %9-30

0.1 %8-31

0.1 %14-32

0.0 %3-33

0.1 %6-34

0.1 %6-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %1-38

0.1 %6-39

0.1 %7-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %4-42

0.0 %5-43

0.1 %6-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %5-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %3-48

0.0 %3-49

- 114 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total












LabelValue

82.4 %8950-0

4.4 %476-1

3.3 %363-2

2.3 %254-3

1.4 %153-4

1.1 %116-5

0.8 %86-6

0.7 %71-7

0.4 %42-8

0.4 %47-9

- 115 -


LabelValue

0.4 %43-10

0.3 %32-11

0.2 %26-12

0.1 %16-13

0.1 %7-14

0.2 %19-15

0.1 %7-16

0.1 %11-17

0.1 %9-18

0.1 %7-19

0.1 %10-20

0.1 %8-21

0.0 %3-22

0.1 %6-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %2-32

0.0 %2-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %2-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-55

0.0 %2-58

0.0 %1-67

0.0 %2-70

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

- 116 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





R_AGE7: RESID 24 CLIENTS AGE 65 AND OVER





Residential clients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

97.0 %10531-0

1.4 %150-1

0.6 %67-2

0.2 %22-3

0.1 %9-4

0.1 %8-5

0.0 %4-6

0.0 %3-7

0.0 %3-8

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

- 117 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-14

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-36

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




R_AGE9: RESID 24 CLIENTS AGE TOTAL





Residential clients (age subtotal)


LabelValue

71.9 %7805-0

0.3 %32-1

0.5 %58-2

0.4 %42-3

0.5 %52-4

0.7 %76-5

- 118 -


LabelValue

1.1 %124-6

0.9 %95-7

1.0 %109-8

0.6 %64-9

1.0 %113-10

0.7 %71-11

1.3 %141-12

0.7 %79-13

1.1 %121-14

0.9 %100-15

1.0 %110-16

0.6 %66-17

0.9 %96-18

0.5 %52-19

0.9 %98-20

0.6 %63-21

0.6 %62-22

0.4 %39-23

0.5 %54-24

0.6 %62-25

0.3 %34-26

0.3 %34-27

0.4 %43-28

0.2 %20-29

0.4 %43-30

0.2 %22-31

0.3 %34-32

0.2 %21-33

0.2 %18-34

0.4 %43-35

0.2 %24-36

0.1 %16-37

0.2 %22-38

0.1 %14-39

0.4 %43-40

0.1 %10-41

0.2 %21-42

0.1 %9-43

0.1 %15-44

0.3 %29-45

0.1 %13-46

0.1 %14-47

- 119 -


LabelValue

0.2 %21-48

0.1 %10-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_RE1: RESID 24 CLIENTS/WHITE





Residential clients, white (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

73.9 %8024-0

1.0 %113-1

1.5 %158-2

1.3 %146-3

1.5 %163-4

1.6 %179-5

1.4 %150-6

1.2 %132-7

- 120 -


LabelValue

1.3 %136-8

1.0 %112-9

1.2 %133-10

1.0 %104-11

1.1 %118-12

0.8 %87-13

0.9 %95-14

0.8 %86-15

0.6 %70-16

0.5 %54-17

0.5 %59-18

0.5 %57-19

0.5 %58-20

0.3 %30-21

0.3 %32-22

0.3 %34-23

0.2 %27-24

0.3 %38-25

0.2 %17-26

0.2 %17-27

0.2 %26-28

0.2 %20-29

0.2 %26-30

0.2 %19-31

0.2 %17-32

0.1 %16-33

0.1 %10-34

0.2 %17-35

0.1 %14-36

0.1 %10-37

0.1 %15-38

0.0 %3-39

0.1 %15-40

0.1 %6-41

0.1 %7-42

0.1 %8-43

0.0 %5-44

0.1 %11-45

0.1 %6-46

0.0 %3-47

0.1 %6-48

0.0 %2-49

- 121 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_RE2: RESID 24 CLIENTS/BLACK





Residential clients, black (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

77.7 %8433-0

3.0 %328-1

2.4 %262-2

1.8 %194-3

1.5 %158-4

1.3 %140-5

1.3 %138-6

0.8 %86-7

0.9 %103-8

0.7 %78-9

- 122 -


LabelValue

0.9 %94-10

0.5 %50-11

0.5 %54-12

0.4 %42-13

0.4 %43-14

0.4 %41-15

0.4 %45-16

0.3 %34-17

0.3 %35-18

0.2 %24-19

0.3 %28-20

0.1 %11-21

0.2 %24-22

0.2 %20-23

0.2 %18-24

0.3 %32-25

0.1 %13-26

0.1 %15-27

0.1 %14-28

0.1 %10-29

0.1 %15-30

0.1 %6-31

0.1 %8-32

0.1 %7-33

0.1 %12-34

0.1 %11-35

0.1 %11-36

0.0 %3-37

0.1 %6-38

0.1 %6-39

0.0 %5-40

0.0 %4-41

0.1 %6-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %5-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %5-47

0.0 %4-48

0.0 %1-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

- 123 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





R_RE3: RESID 24 CLIENTS/HISPANIC





Residential clients, Hispanic


LabelValue

84.1 %9130-0

4.5 %493-1

2.5 %273-2

1.6 %179-3

0.9 %101-4

1.0 %107-5

0.6 %69-6

0.4 %45-7

0.4 %44-8

0.3 %30-9

0.4 %42-10

0.2 %22-11

- 124 -


LabelValue

0.2 %21-12

0.2 %27-13

0.1 %13-14

0.2 %19-15

0.1 %11-16

0.1 %15-17

0.1 %11-18

0.1 %9-19

0.1 %6-20

0.1 %6-21

0.0 %5-22

0.0 %5-23

0.0 %4-24

0.1 %8-25

0.1 %7-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %3-29

0.1 %8-30

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-33

0.1 %6-34

0.0 %4-35

0.0 %4-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %4-39

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %3-42

0.0 %3-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %1-46

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %3-50

0.0 %1-54

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 125 -





R_RE4: RESID 24 CLIENTS ASIAN OR PACIFIC





Residential clients, Asian or Pacific Iislander


LabelValue

97.0 %10538-0

1.6 %176-1

0.3 %38-2

0.3 %28-3

0.1 %8-4

0.0 %2-5

0.0 %1-6

0.0 %1-7

0.0 %2-8

0.0 %1-9

0.0 %5-10

0.0 %1-11

0.0 %1-12

0.0 %2-13

0.0 %1-18

0.0 %1-31

- 126 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




R_RE5: RESID 24 CLIENTS AMERICAN INDIAN/A.N.





Residential clients, American Indian/Alaskan Native


LabelValue

94.0 %10209-0

2.5 %276-1

1.2 %127-2

0.5 %51-3

0.2 %27-4

0.2 %18-5

0.1 %9-6

0.1 %7-7

0.1 %13-8

0.1 %8-9

0.1 %10-10

- 127 -


LabelValue

0.1 %6-11

0.1 %11-12

0.0 %4-13

0.1 %7-14

0.0 %4-15

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %1-18

0.0 %3-19

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-30

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-48

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




R_RE6: RESID 24 CLIENTS OF OTHER RACE/ETHNIC





- 128 -

Residential clients, other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

97.6 %10602-0

1.2 %128-1

0.3 %28-2

0.1 %16-3

0.0 %4-4

0.1 %8-5

0.0 %2-6

0.0 %2-7

0.0 %2-8

0.0 %5-9

0.0 %2-10

0.0 %1-13

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %1-17

0.0 %2-19

0.0 %1-20

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %1-62

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




R_RE8: RESID 24 CLIENTS RACE/ETHNIC TOTAL




- 129 -


Residential clients (race/ethnicity subtotal)


LabelValue

71.9 %7805-0

0.3 %32-1

0.5 %58-2

0.4 %42-3

0.5 %52-4

0.7 %76-5

1.1 %124-6

0.9 %95-7

1.0 %109-8

0.6 %64-9

1.0 %113-10

0.7 %71-11

1.3 %141-12

0.7 %79-13

1.1 %121-14

0.9 %100-15

1.0 %110-16

0.6 %66-17

0.9 %96-18

0.5 %52-19

0.9 %98-20

0.6 %63-21

0.6 %62-22

0.4 %39-23

0.5 %54-24

0.6 %62-25

0.3 %34-26

0.3 %34-27

0.4 %43-28

0.2 %20-29

0.4 %43-30

0.2 %22-31

0.3 %34-32

0.2 %21-33

0.2 %18-34

0.4 %43-35

- 130 -


LabelValue

0.2 %24-36

0.1 %16-37

0.2 %22-38

0.1 %14-39

0.4 %43-40

0.1 %10-41

0.2 %21-42

0.1 %9-43

0.1 %15-44

0.3 %29-45

0.1 %13-46

0.1 %14-47

0.2 %21-48

0.1 %10-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_SEX1: RESID 24 MALE CLIENTS





- 131 -

Residential clients, male


LabelValue

76.3 %8290-0

0.5 %59-1

0.6 %64-2

0.5 %59-3

0.8 %86-4

0.7 %78-5

0.9 %98-6

0.8 %89-7

0.8 %87-8

0.7 %74-9

1.0 %109-10

0.8 %89-11

1.0 %114-12

0.8 %87-13

0.9 %99-14

0.7 %71-15

0.7 %74-16

0.5 %52-17

0.7 %72-18

0.4 %48-19

0.6 %68-20

0.3 %35-21

0.3 %38-22

0.3 %37-23

0.3 %30-24

0.4 %45-25

0.3 %29-26

0.3 %32-27

0.2 %26-28

0.3 %28-29

0.3 %33-30

0.2 %25-31

0.2 %25-32

0.1 %13-33

0.1 %16-34

0.2 %24-35

0.2 %20-36

0.1 %15-37

0.2 %23-38

0.1 %13-39

- 132 -


LabelValue

0.2 %20-40

0.1 %11-41

0.1 %12-42

0.1 %11-43

0.1 %15-44

0.2 %18-45

0.1 %11-46

0.1 %12-47

0.1 %9-48

0.1 %8-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_SEX2: RESID 24 FEMALE CLIENTS





Residential clients, female

- 133 -


LabelValue

79.9 %8678-0

1.6 %169-1

1.7 %188-2

1.4 %157-3

1.5 %162-4

1.2 %126-5

1.5 %168-6

1.0 %114-7

1.1 %120-8

0.9 %94-9

0.9 %95-10

0.6 %60-11

0.7 %74-12

0.5 %57-13

0.5 %52-14

0.5 %53-15

0.5 %54-16

0.2 %26-17

0.3 %37-18

0.2 %21-19

0.3 %37-20

0.2 %24-21

0.2 %23-22

0.1 %12-23

0.1 %14-24

0.1 %14-25

0.1 %10-26

0.1 %8-27

0.1 %14-28

0.1 %7-29

0.1 %13-30

0.0 %5-31

0.0 %5-32

0.0 %4-33

0.0 %5-34

0.1 %11-35

0.0 %5-36

0.0 %3-37

0.1 %6-38

0.0 %3-39

0.1 %6-40

0.0 %1-41

- 134 -


LabelValue

0.1 %6-42

0.0 %4-43

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %2-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %5-50

0.0 %1-51

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





R_SEX4: RESID 24 CLIENTS GENDER TOTAL





Residential clients (sex subtotal)


LabelValue

71.9 %7805-0

0.3 %32-1

- 135 -


LabelValue

0.5 %58-2

0.4 %42-3

0.5 %52-4

0.7 %76-5

1.1 %124-6

0.9 %95-7

1.0 %109-8

0.6 %64-9

1.0 %113-10

0.7 %71-11

1.3 %141-12

0.7 %79-13

1.1 %121-14

0.9 %100-15

1.0 %110-16

0.6 %66-17

0.9 %96-18

0.5 %52-19

0.9 %98-20

0.6 %63-21

0.6 %62-22

0.4 %39-23

0.5 %54-24

0.6 %62-25

0.3 %34-26

0.3 %34-27

0.4 %43-28

0.2 %20-29

0.4 %43-30

0.2 %22-31

0.3 %34-32

0.2 %21-33

0.2 %18-34

0.4 %43-35

0.2 %24-36

0.1 %16-37

0.2 %22-38

0.1 %14-39

0.4 %43-40

0.1 %10-41

0.2 %21-42

0.1 %9-43

- 136 -


LabelValue

0.1 %15-44

0.3 %29-45

0.1 %13-46

0.1 %14-47

0.2 %21-48

0.1 %10-49

Missing Data

0.5 %53MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_CLI5: NUMBER OF OUTPATIENTS



e. Outpatients (less than 24-hour care) (who received a substance abusetreatment service between September 1 and October 1, 1997 and were stillenrolled on October 1, 1997...DO NOT INCLUDE CLIENTS WHOSE ONLY SERVICE ISATTENDING A DUI/DWI PROGRAM)


LabelValue

31.0 %3372-0

0.9 %96-1

1.2 %133-2

1.4 %149-3

1.2 %134-4

1.9 %207-5

- 137 -


LabelValue

1.4 %152-6

0.9 %94-7

1.0 %114-8

0.7 %72-9

2.7 %291-10

0.6 %67-11

1.5 %163-12

0.6 %63-13

0.7 %78-14

1.7 %186-15

0.8 %88-16

0.6 %69-17

0.6 %60-18

0.5 %57-19

2.0 %216-20

0.6 %62-21

0.6 %63-22

0.5 %55-23

0.6 %68-24

1.5 %163-25

0.5 %51-26

0.5 %55-27

0.5 %50-28

0.4 %39-29

1.6 %178-30

0.4 %47-31

0.5 %52-32

0.2 %25-33

0.4 %45-34

0.9 %97-35

0.3 %38-36

0.3 %38-37

0.4 %43-38

0.3 %33-39

1.2 %125-40

0.3 %31-41

0.2 %25-42

0.3 %36-43

0.2 %21-44

0.7 %73-45

0.2 %18-46

0.3 %33-47

- 138 -


LabelValue

0.4 %39-48

0.3 %28-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_CLI6: NUMBER OF INTENSIVE OUTPATIENTS



f. Intensive outpatients* (who received a substance abuse treatement service -including day treatment - between September 1 and October 1, 1997 and werestill enrolled on October 1, 1997)*Intensive outpatient services are services provided to a client that last2 hours or more per day, 3 or more days a week


LabelValue

65.9 %7160-0

0.8 %90-1

1.2 %131-2

1.2 %132-3

1.2 %131-4

1.3 %146-5

1.2 %129-6

0.9 %103-7

1.5 %163-8

0.6 %70-9

2.1 %227-10

- 139 -


LabelValue

0.6 %67-11

1.3 %140-12

0.6 %62-13

0.7 %71-14

1.3 %142-15

0.5 %58-16

0.4 %45-17

0.6 %65-18

0.4 %43-19

1.4 %156-20

0.4 %43-21

0.5 %56-22

0.3 %28-23

0.4 %43-24

0.8 %83-25

0.3 %33-26

0.3 %30-27

0.3 %34-28

0.1 %13-29

1.0 %108-30

0.1 %15-31

0.3 %33-32

0.2 %18-33

0.2 %27-34

0.4 %45-35

0.2 %25-36

0.2 %20-37

0.1 %16-38

0.1 %12-39

0.5 %56-40

0.1 %15-41

0.2 %19-42

0.1 %14-43

0.1 %14-44

0.2 %20-45

0.1 %8-46

0.1 %8-47

0.1 %7-48

0.1 %11-49

Missing Data

0.5 %55MISSING-9

- 140 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





O_AGE1: OUTPAT CLIENTS UNDER 18 YEARS OLD





Outpatient clients, under 18 years


LabelValue

62.7 %6804-0

5.5 %594-1

4.1 %448-2

2.9 %315-3

1.9 %210-4

2.3 %250-5

1.4 %154-6

1.0 %113-7

1.5 %162-8

0.7 %76-9

1.5 %168-10

0.7 %76-11

- 141 -


LabelValue

0.9 %94-12

0.6 %70-13

0.6 %61-14

1.0 %108-15

0.5 %58-16

0.5 %55-17

0.4 %42-18

0.3 %34-19

0.7 %78-20

0.3 %37-21

0.2 %26-22

0.2 %23-23

0.2 %26-24

0.5 %50-25

0.3 %30-26

0.2 %22-27

0.3 %33-28

0.2 %18-29

0.5 %57-30

0.1 %14-31

0.1 %14-32

0.1 %14-33

0.1 %12-34

0.2 %19-35

0.2 %17-36

0.1 %13-37

0.1 %15-38

0.1 %10-39

0.2 %18-40

0.1 %7-41

0.1 %9-42

0.1 %6-43

0.1 %6-44

0.1 %16-45

0.0 %5-46

0.1 %9-47

0.1 %7-48

0.1 %6-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 142 -





O_AGE2: OUTPAT CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 18 - 20





Outpatient clients, age 18-20


LabelValue

50.6 %5490-0

8.9 %966-1

8.4 %907-2

5.2 %560-3

3.5 %383-4

3.7 %403-5

1.9 %205-6

1.6 %175-7

1.4 %151-8

1.1 %124-9

2.3 %245-10

0.9 %95-11

0.8 %90-12

0.5 %58-13

0.4 %39-14

0.8 %86-15

- 143 -


LabelValue

0.5 %59-16

0.4 %39-17

0.3 %38-18

0.2 %23-19

0.9 %95-20

0.2 %26-21

0.2 %23-22

0.3 %29-23

0.3 %28-24

0.4 %47-25

0.1 %15-26

0.2 %20-27

0.1 %15-28

0.2 %17-29

0.3 %31-30

0.1 %9-31

0.1 %8-32

0.1 %12-33

0.1 %9-34

0.1 %12-35

0.1 %16-36

0.1 %9-37

0.0 %5-38

0.1 %9-39

0.2 %19-40

0.1 %6-41

0.1 %8-42

0.0 %5-43

0.0 %3-44

0.1 %7-45

0.0 %5-46

0.1 %6-47

0.0 %5-48

0.0 %4-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 5.01

- 144 -



O_AGE3: OUTPAT CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 21 - 24







LabelValue

42.2 %4578-0

7.2 %778-1

6.8 %734-2

5.2 %568-3

4.2 %457-4

4.7 %506-5

2.7 %290-6

2.1 %231-7

2.0 %215-8

1.1 %124-9

3.4 %368-10

1.0 %106-11

1.1 %124-12

0.8 %90-13

0.9 %95-14

1.5 %160-15

0.7 %73-16

0.5 %49-17

0.6 %63-18

0.5 %56-19

- 145 -


LabelValue

1.6 %172-20

0.4 %43-21

0.3 %37-22

0.4 %39-23

0.3 %34-24

0.6 %65-25

0.3 %33-26

0.2 %21-27

0.2 %17-28

0.2 %26-29

0.6 %67-30

0.1 %16-31

0.2 %27-32

0.2 %27-33

0.2 %19-34

0.3 %34-35

0.1 %16-36

0.1 %12-37

0.1 %16-38

0.2 %18-39

0.4 %46-40

0.1 %7-41

0.1 %8-42

0.1 %10-43

0.1 %8-44

0.1 %14-45

0.1 %9-46

0.1 %9-47

0.1 %7-48

0.0 %3-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 146 -



O_AGE4: OUTPAT CLIENTS AGE 25-34 YEARS







LabelValue

30.7 %3339-0

3.1 %334-1

3.8 %411-2

3.6 %387-3

2.9 %313-4

3.3 %362-5

2.5 %270-6

2.0 %217-7

2.2 %237-8

1.7 %190-9

3.2 %346-10

1.5 %167-11

1.8 %193-12

0.9 %103-13

1.1 %123-14

2.1 %224-15

1.0 %104-16

0.9 %94-17

1.2 %129-18

0.7 %76-19

2.1 %233-20

0.9 %93-21

0.7 %81-22

- 147 -


LabelValue

0.6 %60-23

0.8 %89-24

1.2 %125-25

0.6 %63-26

0.5 %59-27

0.6 %60-28

0.6 %66-29

1.3 %140-30

0.4 %44-31

0.4 %44-32

0.4 %44-33

0.5 %55-34

0.7 %75-35

0.4 %44-36

0.5 %52-37

0.3 %36-38

0.4 %46-39

1.0 %104-40

0.3 %37-41

0.3 %34-42

0.3 %29-43

0.3 %30-44

0.5 %51-45

0.3 %30-46

0.3 %35-47

0.3 %29-48

0.2 %27-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





- 148 -








LabelValue

32.2 %3502-0

4.1 %449-1

4.2 %461-2

4.0 %432-3

3.3 %354-4

3.5 %376-5

2.7 %298-6

2.0 %222-7

2.2 %240-8

1.6 %171-9

3.0 %325-10

1.3 %145-11

1.4 %157-12

1.3 %138-13

1.1 %124-14

1.6 %170-15

0.9 %93-16

0.9 %100-17

1.0 %104-18

0.8 %83-19

1.8 %197-20

0.7 %79-21

0.7 %76-22

0.6 %64-23

0.5 %50-24

1.0 %111-25

0.5 %51-26

- 149 -


LabelValue

0.5 %57-27

0.5 %52-28

0.5 %57-29

1.0 %113-30

0.3 %37-31

0.4 %42-32

0.4 %43-33

0.5 %53-34

0.5 %56-35

0.2 %27-36

0.2 %27-37

0.3 %35-38

0.3 %34-39

0.8 %86-40

0.4 %43-41

0.3 %34-42

0.4 %41-43

0.2 %25-44

0.4 %43-45

0.2 %26-46

0.3 %35-47

0.2 %25-48

0.2 %22-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total







- 150 -






LabelValue

43.4 %4714-0

7.0 %760-1

6.0 %651-2

4.4 %483-3

3.8 %412-4

3.3 %354-5

2.4 %259-6

2.0 %215-7

1.9 %207-8

1.7 %183-9

2.3 %249-10

0.9 %96-11

1.2 %126-12

0.8 %87-13

1.0 %107-14

1.1 %116-15

0.7 %71-16

0.7 %73-17

0.7 %79-18

0.6 %63-19

1.2 %131-20

0.5 %50-21

0.3 %38-22

0.4 %40-23

0.4 %45-24

0.5 %53-25

0.4 %45-26

0.3 %30-27

0.3 %38-28

0.3 %30-29

0.5 %53-30

0.2 %24-31

- 151 -


LabelValue

0.2 %23-32

0.2 %22-33

0.1 %16-34

0.3 %28-35

0.2 %23-36

0.2 %21-37

0.2 %21-38

0.2 %20-39

0.2 %25-40

0.2 %17-41

0.1 %10-42

0.2 %18-43

0.1 %13-44

0.2 %19-45

0.1 %11-46

0.1 %9-47

0.1 %16-48

0.1 %10-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_AGE7: OUTPAT CLIENTS AGE 65 AND OVER




- 152 -


Outpatient clients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

76.3 %8291-0

8.1 %881-1

4.9 %536-2

2.3 %254-3

1.4 %148-4

1.4 %155-5

0.7 %81-6

0.5 %52-7

0.4 %46-8

0.3 %34-9

0.7 %72-10

0.2 %19-11

0.2 %18-12

0.1 %14-13

0.1 %13-14

0.2 %19-15

0.1 %9-16

0.1 %6-17

0.1 %11-18

0.0 %5-19

0.2 %26-20

0.1 %8-21

0.1 %12-22

0.0 %5-23

0.1 %7-24

0.1 %6-25

0.1 %6-26

0.0 %4-27

0.0 %2-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %3-31

0.0 %3-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %4-35

- 153 -


LabelValue

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %3-46

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %1-59

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_AGE9: OUTPAT CLIENTS AGE TOTAL





- 154 -

Outpatient clients, (age subtotal)


LabelValue

22.0 %2389-0

0.8 %90-1

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %139-3

1.2 %126-4

1.6 %169-5

1.4 %152-6

1.0 %112-7

1.2 %133-8

0.7 %80-9

2.6 %278-10

0.8 %82-11

1.4 %157-12

0.7 %77-13

0.9 %100-14

1.6 %175-15

0.9 %102-16

0.7 %77-17

0.9 %93-18

0.6 %64-19

1.7 %186-20

0.7 %81-21

0.7 %81-22

0.7 %79-23

0.9 %93-24

1.4 %153-25

0.6 %62-26

0.6 %63-27

0.7 %76-28

0.5 %51-29

1.6 %178-30

0.5 %57-31

0.6 %69-32

0.4 %41-33

0.6 %66-34

1.0 %112-35

0.4 %46-36

0.5 %50-37

0.5 %50-38

0.4 %43-39

- 155 -


LabelValue

1.2 %132-40

0.4 %42-41

0.4 %43-42

0.4 %46-43

0.3 %32-44

0.8 %90-45

0.2 %25-46

0.3 %38-47

0.4 %42-48

0.3 %38-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_RE1: OUTPAT CLIENTS/WHITE





Outpatient clients, white (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

25.7 %2789-0

2.2 %243-1

- 156 -


LabelValue

2.4 %257-2

2.3 %253-3

2.2 %244-4

2.2 %242-5

1.9 %204-6

1.7 %185-7

2.0 %219-8

1.5 %162-9

2.2 %234-10

1.2 %128-11

1.7 %181-12

1.0 %107-13

1.4 %155-14

1.4 %156-15

1.0 %104-16

0.9 %103-17

1.0 %111-18

0.9 %102-19

1.3 %141-20

0.8 %92-21

0.8 %84-22

0.8 %82-23

0.9 %93-24

1.0 %110-25

0.8 %84-26

0.7 %71-27

0.7 %81-28

0.6 %66-29

1.1 %121-30

0.6 %64-31

0.5 %49-32

0.5 %58-33

0.5 %50-34

0.8 %89-35

0.5 %51-36

0.5 %49-37

0.4 %39-38

0.4 %40-39

0.9 %96-40

0.4 %42-41

0.5 %51-42

0.5 %58-43

- 157 -


LabelValue

0.4 %48-44

0.6 %64-45

0.3 %36-46

0.4 %47-47

0.4 %40-48

0.3 %32-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_RE2: OUTPAT CLIENTS/BLACK





Outpatient clients, black (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

43.3 %4704-0

7.4 %800-1

5.7 %615-2

3.6 %395-3

2.7 %296-4

2.7 %293-5

- 158 -


LabelValue

2.0 %217-6

1.8 %191-7

1.6 %173-8

1.0 %106-9

1.9 %201-10

0.8 %87-11

1.0 %104-12

0.9 %95-13

0.6 %64-14

1.3 %136-15

0.6 %63-16

0.5 %53-17

0.7 %71-18

0.6 %62-19

1.1 %123-20

0.5 %49-21

0.4 %46-22

0.3 %37-23

0.5 %54-24

0.7 %78-25

0.3 %34-26

0.4 %48-27

0.4 %40-28

0.3 %38-29

0.5 %58-30

0.3 %35-31

0.2 %26-32

0.2 %25-33

0.3 %28-34

0.4 %48-35

0.2 %20-36

0.2 %26-37

0.4 %40-38

0.2 %17-39

0.5 %58-40

0.1 %16-41

0.2 %21-42

0.2 %18-43

0.2 %20-44

0.2 %19-45

0.1 %15-46

0.1 %16-47

- 159 -


LabelValue

0.2 %25-48

0.1 %13-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_RE3: OUTPAT CLIENTS/HISPANIC





Outpatient clients, Hispanic


LabelValue

53.1 %5771-0

8.8 %955-1

6.0 %657-2

3.9 %421-3

2.8 %306-4

2.6 %278-5

1.8 %193-6

1.3 %139-7

1.1 %117-8

0.9 %93-9

- 160 -


LabelValue

1.5 %166-10

0.6 %61-11

0.8 %87-12

0.5 %51-13

0.6 %60-14

0.7 %77-15

0.5 %49-16

0.4 %40-17

0.4 %47-18

0.3 %31-19

0.7 %79-20

0.4 %43-21

0.4 %46-22

0.2 %26-23

0.2 %26-24

0.5 %49-25

0.2 %21-26

0.2 %22-27

0.2 %20-28

0.2 %17-29

0.4 %47-30

0.2 %18-31

0.1 %13-32

0.1 %11-33

0.1 %10-34

0.3 %31-35

0.1 %8-36

0.1 %10-37

0.2 %17-38

0.2 %18-39

0.3 %28-40

0.1 %10-41

0.1 %13-42

0.1 %8-43

0.1 %6-44

0.1 %12-45

0.1 %11-46

0.1 %12-47

0.1 %14-48

0.1 %16-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

- 161 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





O_RE4: OUTPAT CLIENTS ASIAN OR PACIFIC





Outpatient clients, Asian or Pacific Islander


LabelValue

85.9 %9327-0

6.5 %702-1

2.5 %269-2

1.2 %131-3

0.6 %62-4

0.6 %67-5

0.3 %29-6

0.3 %36-7

0.2 %20-8

0.1 %12-9

0.2 %25-10

0.1 %10-11

- 162 -


LabelValue

0.1 %8-12

0.1 %6-13

0.1 %7-14

0.1 %8-15

0.1 %6-16

0.1 %6-17

0.0 %4-18

0.0 %1-19

0.1 %10-20

0.0 %3-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %5-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %2-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %2-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %2-53

0.0 %2-63

0.0 %1-69

0.0 %1-71

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 163 -





O_RE5: OUTPAT CLIENTS AMERICAN INDIAN/A.N.





Outpatient clients, American Indian/Alaskan Native


LabelValue

77.4 %8408-0

8.1 %882-1

3.8 %408-2

2.1 %228-3

1.2 %132-4

1.1 %119-5

0.6 %70-6

0.5 %51-7

0.5 %57-8

0.4 %40-9

0.5 %53-10

0.2 %23-11

0.2 %21-12

0.1 %12-13

0.1 %16-14

0.2 %23-15

- 164 -


LabelValue

0.1 %11-16

0.1 %12-17

0.1 %16-18

0.0 %4-19

0.1 %16-20

0.1 %8-21

0.1 %9-22

0.0 %5-23

0.0 %3-24

0.1 %13-25

0.0 %3-26

0.0 %5-27

0.1 %9-28

0.1 %6-29

0.1 %9-30

0.0 %4-31

0.1 %7-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %5-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %1-37

0.0 %3-38

0.0 %1-39

0.1 %7-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %2-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %1-44

0.0 %4-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %3-47

0.0 %2-49

0.1 %6-50

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 2.04

- 165 -



O_RE6: OUTPAT CLIENTS OF OTHER RACE/ETHNIC





Outpatient clients, other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

88.1 %9566-0

4.5 %487-1

2.0 %216-2

1.1 %117-3

0.9 %94-4

0.5 %55-5

0.4 %45-6

0.3 %31-7

0.2 %17-8

0.2 %20-9

0.2 %17-10

0.2 %18-11

0.1 %13-12

0.1 %12-13

0.0 %2-14

0.1 %13-15

0.1 %7-16

0.0 %2-17

0.0 %4-18

0.0 %4-19

- 166 -


LabelValue

0.0 %4-20

0.0 %3-21

0.1 %6-22

0.1 %7-23

0.0 %1-24

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %4-29

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %1-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %2-52

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %2-60

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-63

0.0 %1-70

0.0 %1-75

0.0 %1-78

0.0 %1-90

0.0 %1-106

0.0 %1-113

0.0 %1-123

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 167 -



O_RE8: OUTPAT CLIENTS RACE/ETHNIC TOTAL





Outpatient clients (race/ethnicity subtotal)


LabelValue

22.0 %2389-0

0.8 %90-1

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %139-3

1.2 %126-4

1.6 %169-5

1.4 %152-6

1.0 %112-7

1.2 %133-8

0.7 %80-9

2.6 %278-10

0.8 %82-11

1.4 %157-12

0.7 %77-13

0.9 %100-14

1.6 %175-15

0.9 %102-16

0.7 %77-17

0.9 %93-18

0.6 %64-19

1.7 %186-20

0.7 %81-21

0.7 %81-22

- 168 -


LabelValue

0.7 %79-23

0.9 %93-24

1.4 %153-25

0.6 %62-26

0.6 %63-27

0.7 %76-28

0.5 %51-29

1.6 %178-30

0.5 %57-31

0.6 %69-32

0.4 %41-33

0.6 %66-34

1.0 %112-35

0.4 %46-36

0.5 %50-37

0.5 %50-38

0.4 %43-39

1.2 %132-40

0.4 %42-41

0.4 %43-42

0.4 %46-43

0.3 %32-44

0.8 %90-45

0.2 %25-46

0.3 %38-47

0.4 %42-48

0.3 %38-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





- 169 -

O_SEX1: OUTPAT MALE CLIENTS





Outpatient clients, male


LabelValue

25.2 %2741-0

1.4 %153-1

2.1 %226-2

1.8 %200-3

1.9 %205-4

1.9 %208-5

1.7 %187-6

1.6 %171-7

1.8 %193-8

1.3 %139-9

1.9 %208-10

1.0 %114-11

1.5 %159-12

1.1 %122-13

1.3 %138-14

1.4 %156-15

1.0 %104-16

1.2 %132-17

1.2 %127-18

0.9 %95-19

1.4 %151-20

0.7 %77-21

0.8 %88-22

0.7 %81-23

0.9 %103-24

1.0 %111-25

0.8 %91-26

- 170 -


LabelValue

0.8 %84-27

0.8 %84-28

0.6 %62-29

1.0 %107-30

0.5 %57-31

0.7 %71-32

0.5 %58-33

0.5 %52-34

0.9 %97-35

0.6 %67-36

0.5 %53-37

0.5 %56-38

0.4 %45-39

1.1 %115-40

0.3 %33-41

0.5 %49-42

0.3 %30-43

0.3 %34-44

0.6 %60-45

0.3 %36-46

0.5 %53-47

0.4 %40-48

0.3 %35-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_SEX2: OUTPAT FEMALE CLIENTS


LabelValue

27.7 %3003-0

- 171 -


LabelValue

4.2 %456-1

4.3 %464-2

3.7 %401-3

3.3 %356-4

3.4 %367-5

2.4 %260-6

2.1 %233-7

2.6 %284-8

1.6 %175-9

2.8 %302-10

1.4 %156-11

1.7 %189-12

1.3 %140-13

1.1 %122-14

1.8 %199-15

1.1 %123-16

0.9 %98-17

1.0 %112-18

0.7 %76-19

1.7 %183-20

0.7 %80-21

0.7 %80-22

0.7 %74-23

0.7 %74-24

1.1 %124-25

0.4 %47-26

0.6 %62-27

0.6 %67-28

0.5 %58-29

1.1 %117-30

0.3 %36-31

0.7 %75-32

0.5 %58-33

0.5 %51-34

0.7 %74-35

0.5 %49-36

0.2 %25-37

0.4 %42-38

0.3 %36-39

0.7 %80-40

0.3 %32-41

0.3 %36-42

- 172 -


LabelValue

0.4 %41-43

0.3 %36-44

0.5 %50-45

0.2 %27-46

0.3 %33-47

0.3 %33-48

0.3 %29-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





O_SEX4: OUTPAT CLIENTS GENDER TOTAL





Outpatient clients (sex subtotal)


LabelValue

22.0 %2389-0

0.8 %90-1

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %139-3

1.2 %126-4

- 173 -


LabelValue

1.6 %169-5

1.4 %152-6

1.0 %112-7

1.2 %133-8

0.7 %80-9

2.6 %278-10

0.8 %82-11

1.4 %157-12

0.7 %77-13

0.9 %100-14

1.6 %175-15

0.9 %102-16

0.7 %77-17

0.9 %93-18

0.6 %64-19

1.7 %186-20

0.7 %81-21

0.7 %81-22

0.7 %79-23

0.9 %93-24

1.4 %153-25

0.6 %62-26

0.6 %63-27

0.7 %76-28

0.5 %51-29

1.6 %178-30

0.5 %57-31

0.6 %69-32

0.4 %41-33

0.6 %66-34

1.0 %112-35

0.4 %46-36

0.5 %50-37

0.5 %50-38

0.4 %43-39

1.2 %132-40

0.4 %42-41

0.4 %43-42

0.4 %46-43

0.3 %32-44

0.8 %90-45

0.2 %25-46

- 174 -


LabelValue

0.3 %38-47

0.4 %42-48

0.3 %38-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_CLI7: TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS



g. TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS (add a-f above)


LabelValue

1.4 %150-0

0.8 %85-1

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %146-3

1.5 %161-4

1.6 %176-5

2.1 %225-6

1.6 %173-7

1.8 %197-8

1.1 %115-9

3.0 %327-10

1.2 %129-11

2.3 %254-12

- 175 -


LabelValue

1.2 %129-13

1.7 %182-14

2.2 %243-15

1.6 %178-16

1.2 %135-17

1.5 %160-18

1.1 %115-19

2.4 %257-20

1.2 %129-21

1.2 %131-22

0.9 %97-23

1.3 %142-24

1.8 %191-25

0.9 %99-26

0.9 %96-27

1.0 %108-28

0.7 %71-29

1.7 %189-30

0.7 %76-31

0.9 %94-32

0.6 %64-33

0.8 %91-34

1.3 %145-35

0.8 %82-36

0.6 %65-37

0.7 %80-38

0.5 %59-39

1.4 %148-40

0.4 %48-41

0.6 %61-42

0.5 %58-43

0.4 %48-44

1.0 %106-45

0.4 %45-46

0.4 %47-47

0.5 %55-48

0.4 %40-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 176 -





A_NUM: NUMBER OF CLIENTS TREATD FOR ALC ABUSE

Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1, 1997, for: a. Alcohol abuseonly (Number calculated from reported percent and total active clients)


LabelValue

25.9 %2818-0

5.4 %587-1

5.9 %642-2

4.9 %535-3

4.1 %443-4

3.9 %423-5

3.2 %344-6

2.4 %258-7

2.5 %272-8

1.8 %194-9

2.2 %240-10

1.5 %162-11

1.6 %174-12

1.2 %125-13

1.5 %165-14

1.6 %178-15

1.2 %129-16

1.0 %106-17

1.0 %112-18

0.8 %91-19

1.3 %143-20

0.7 %75-21

0.8 %92-22

0.7 %75-23

0.6 %64-24

0.7 %78-25

0.5 %57-26

0.6 %60-27

- 177 -


LabelValue

0.5 %58-28

0.5 %54-29

0.8 %82-30

0.4 %46-31

0.4 %43-32

0.5 %51-33

0.3 %33-34

0.4 %47-35

0.3 %35-36

0.2 %25-37

0.4 %44-38

0.3 %30-39

0.4 %48-40

0.3 %34-41

0.4 %40-42

0.3 %33-43

0.3 %34-44

0.4 %47-45

0.2 %27-46

0.3 %33-47

0.2 %23-48

0.3 %29-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





D_NUM: NUMBER OF CLIENTS TREATD FOR DRG ABUSE

Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1, 1997, for: b. Drug abuseonly (Number calculated from reported percent and total active clients)

- 178 -


LabelValue

30.4 %3297-0

5.7 %623-1

5.3 %580-2

4.8 %520-3

4.3 %471-4

3.5 %381-5

2.6 %284-6

2.2 %239-7

2.4 %261-8

1.7 %182-9

2.4 %256-10

1.5 %164-11

1.5 %164-12

1.0 %110-13

1.1 %118-14

1.3 %146-15

0.9 %102-16

0.8 %88-17

1.2 %125-18

0.8 %87-19

1.0 %112-20

0.6 %65-21

0.4 %46-22

0.6 %70-23

0.7 %74-24

0.7 %77-25

0.5 %55-26

0.5 %49-27

0.5 %54-28

0.5 %57-29

0.7 %75-30

0.3 %34-31

0.4 %41-32

0.3 %36-33

0.3 %36-34

0.4 %42-35

0.2 %26-36

0.3 %30-37

0.3 %30-38

0.2 %22-39

0.5 %52-40

0.2 %27-41

- 179 -


LabelValue

0.2 %27-42

0.3 %31-43

0.2 %21-44

0.3 %30-45

0.2 %22-46

0.2 %17-47

0.3 %32-48

0.2 %22-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





B_NUM: NO. OF CLTS TREATD FOR ALC / DRG ABUSE

Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1, 1997, for: c. Both alcoholand drug abuse (Number calculated from reported percent and total active clients)


LabelValue

16.2 %1757-0

3.0 %326-1

4.0 %433-2

3.4 %369-3

3.1 %341-4

3.1 %333-5

2.9 %317-6

2.5 %272-7

2.9 %312-8

1.9 %201-9

2.7 %290-10

2.0 %221-11

2.2 %235-12

1.7 %183-13

- 180 -


LabelValue

1.7 %186-14

1.9 %211-15

1.4 %157-16

1.4 %157-17

1.6 %173-18

1.1 %120-19

1.6 %175-20

1.2 %130-21

0.8 %92-22

0.8 %87-23

1.3 %146-24

1.0 %113-25

0.9 %96-26

0.9 %96-27

0.8 %88-28

0.6 %70-29

0.9 %95-30

0.6 %62-31

0.7 %81-32

0.6 %63-33

0.7 %79-34

0.7 %81-35

0.6 %68-36

0.5 %59-37

0.5 %54-38

0.3 %37-39

0.8 %82-40

0.3 %36-41

0.4 %45-42

0.4 %41-43

0.5 %51-44

0.5 %55-45

0.3 %38-46

0.2 %26-47

0.5 %52-48

0.3 %38-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total


- 181 -




A_PCT: PERCENT OF CLIENTS TRTED FOR ALC ABUSE

Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1, 1997, for: a. Alcohol abuseonly (percent)


LabelValue

25.4 %2755-0

0.7 %80-1

1.0 %106-2

0.6 %62-3

0.5 %58-4

2.8 %306-5

0.6 %64-6

0.6 %60-7

0.7 %81-8

0.5 %51-9

6.3 %680-10

0.4 %47-11

0.7 %75-12

0.6 %62-13

0.5 %53-14

2.3 %251-15

0.5 %51-16

0.6 %62-17

0.4 %43-18

0.4 %45-19

5.4 %588-20

0.4 %40-21

0.5 %51-22

0.3 %37-23

0.4 %41-24

3.9 %419-25

0.4 %39-26

0.5 %52-27

0.3 %35-28

0.4 %39-29

- 182 -


LabelValue

3.6 %391-30

0.3 %38-31

0.4 %42-32

1.3 %141-33

0.5 %53-34

1.2 %125-35

0.3 %29-36

0.3 %31-37

0.5 %51-38

0.3 %35-39

3.2 %352-40

0.3 %31-41

0.4 %43-42

0.4 %43-43

0.4 %39-44

0.8 %90-45

0.3 %33-46

0.4 %45-47

0.4 %39-48

0.2 %23-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





D_PCT: PERCENT OF CLIENTS TRTED FOR DRG ABUSE

Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1, 1997, for: b. Drug abuseonly (percent)

- 183 -


LabelValue

29.7 %3230-0

0.8 %82-1

0.7 %80-2

0.6 %70-3

0.4 %46-4

3.7 %399-5

0.7 %78-6

0.7 %75-7

1.0 %112-8

0.5 %57-9

7.8 %851-10

0.7 %80-11

0.9 %95-12

0.8 %89-13

0.8 %91-14

3.4 %368-15

0.6 %63-16

0.8 %86-17

0.6 %61-18

0.5 %53-19

6.8 %738-20

0.7 %73-21

0.7 %78-22

0.5 %49-23

0.5 %51-24

4.3 %462-25

0.4 %43-26

0.6 %70-27

0.4 %43-28

0.5 %53-29

3.7 %401-30

0.4 %44-31

0.3 %33-32

1.2 %131-33

0.3 %34-34

0.8 %83-35

0.3 %35-36

0.2 %25-37

0.4 %43-38

0.2 %18-39

2.2 %236-40

0.2 %22-41

- 184 -


LabelValue

0.2 %27-42

0.3 %32-43

0.2 %24-44

0.4 %42-45

0.2 %22-46

0.1 %13-47

0.2 %22-48

0.2 %17-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





B_PCT: PERC OF CLTS TREATED FOR ALC/DRG ABUSE

Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1, 1997, for: c. Both alcoholand drug abuse (percent)


LabelValue

15.9 %1725-0

0.3 %37-1

0.4 %48-2

0.3 %34-3

0.3 %29-4

1.0 %112-5

0.3 %29-6

0.3 %37-7

0.3 %36-8

0.3 %33-9

2.8 %309-10

0.3 %38-11

- 185 -


LabelValue

0.3 %38-12

0.4 %45-13

0.4 %46-14

1.2 %132-15

0.3 %33-16

0.4 %41-17

0.4 %44-18

0.3 %29-19

4.0 %430-20

0.2 %25-21

0.4 %45-22

0.4 %47-23

0.4 %41-24

2.6 %287-25

0.3 %37-26

0.4 %45-27

0.4 %48-28

0.4 %41-29

3.2 %343-30

0.3 %34-31

0.3 %34-32

1.1 %117-33

0.5 %57-34

1.2 %126-35

0.4 %45-36

0.3 %38-37

0.5 %55-38

0.3 %38-39

3.8 %414-40

0.4 %40-41

0.4 %45-42

0.3 %36-43

0.3 %37-44

1.0 %108-45

0.4 %44-46

0.4 %41-47

0.4 %39-48

0.3 %38-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 186 -





T_AGE1: NUMBER OF CLIENTS UNDER 18 YEARS OLD





Total clients, under 18 years


LabelValue

58.1 %6315-0

6.0 %650-1

4.5 %493-2

3.1 %334-3

2.1 %226-4

2.5 %270-5

1.6 %171-6

1.2 %132-7

1.5 %167-8

0.8 %89-9

1.7 %189-10

0.8 %83-11

1.1 %118-12

0.7 %74-13

0.7 %77-14

1.1 %121-15

- 187 -


LabelValue

0.7 %71-16

0.6 %60-17

0.5 %50-18

0.4 %39-19

0.9 %99-20

0.4 %42-21

0.3 %33-22

0.3 %29-23

0.3 %34-24

0.5 %57-25

0.3 %36-26

0.2 %26-27

0.3 %34-28

0.1 %15-29

0.6 %66-30

0.1 %13-31

0.2 %20-32

0.1 %16-33

0.1 %15-34

0.2 %24-35

0.2 %22-36

0.2 %17-37

0.2 %22-38

0.1 %10-39

0.2 %21-40

0.1 %8-41

0.1 %10-42

0.1 %6-43

0.0 %5-44

0.1 %16-45

0.1 %8-46

0.1 %9-47

0.1 %11-48

0.0 %5-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 7.54

- 188 -



T_AGE2: NUMBER OF CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 18 - 20





Total clients, age 18-20


LabelValue

39.3 %4273-0

12.4 %1347-1

11.0 %1192-2

6.3 %685-3

4.2 %460-4

4.4 %474-5

2.4 %257-6

1.8 %199-7

1.6 %173-8

1.3 %144-9

2.6 %281-10

0.9 %98-11

1.0 %104-12

0.6 %61-13

0.4 %42-14

0.9 %99-15

0.6 %61-16

0.4 %42-17

0.3 %38-18

0.2 %23-19

- 189 -


LabelValue

1.0 %112-20

0.2 %26-21

0.3 %33-22

0.3 %29-23

0.3 %34-24

0.5 %51-25

0.1 %16-26

0.2 %18-27

0.2 %19-28

0.2 %17-29

0.4 %40-30

0.1 %10-31

0.1 %12-32

0.1 %13-33

0.1 %9-34

0.1 %12-35

0.1 %15-36

0.1 %14-37

0.1 %6-38

0.1 %9-39

0.2 %26-40

0.0 %5-41

0.1 %8-42

0.1 %6-43

0.0 %2-44

0.1 %6-45

0.0 %5-46

0.1 %7-47

0.0 %4-48

0.1 %6-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 190 -



T_AGE3: NUMBER OF CLIENTS BETWEEN AGE 21 - 24







LabelValue

27.5 %2983-0

10.2 %1106-1

9.7 %1058-2

7.0 %758-3

5.3 %577-4

5.9 %637-5

3.4 %367-6

2.6 %281-7

2.4 %262-8

1.4 %148-9

4.1 %446-10

1.1 %115-11

1.4 %147-12

0.9 %96-13

0.8 %92-14

1.8 %193-15

0.8 %89-16

0.6 %63-17

0.6 %62-18

0.6 %63-19

1.8 %199-20

0.4 %44-21

0.4 %41-22

- 191 -


LabelValue

0.3 %37-23

0.3 %30-24

0.6 %68-25

0.3 %36-26

0.2 %27-27

0.2 %22-28

0.2 %26-29

0.7 %78-30

0.2 %20-31

0.3 %32-32

0.3 %28-33

0.2 %23-34

0.3 %36-35

0.2 %20-36

0.1 %12-37

0.2 %19-38

0.2 %17-39

0.5 %52-40

0.1 %7-41

0.1 %8-42

0.1 %8-43

0.1 %13-44

0.1 %14-45

0.1 %9-46

0.1 %11-47

0.1 %9-48

0.0 %4-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




Location: 475-478 (width: 4; decimal: 0)Variable Type: numeric

- 192 -

(Range of) Missing Values: -9

T_AGE4: NUMBER OF CLIENTS AGE 25-34 YEARS







LabelValue

13.1 %1419-0

3.8 %408-1

4.7 %514-2

4.8 %522-3

3.8 %415-4

4.5 %487-5

3.4 %374-6

3.0 %329-7

3.1 %339-8

2.5 %267-9

4.5 %492-10

2.1 %225-11

2.2 %243-12

1.3 %146-13

1.5 %160-14

2.6 %282-15

1.4 %148-16

1.0 %113-17

1.4 %157-18

0.9 %99-19

2.6 %282-20

0.9 %102-21

0.9 %99-22

0.8 %85-23

1.0 %106-24

1.5 %161-25

- 193 -


LabelValue

0.7 %78-26

0.6 %67-27

0.7 %71-28

0.6 %68-29

1.6 %173-30

0.5 %58-31

0.5 %54-32

0.4 %45-33

0.6 %63-34

0.8 %86-35

0.4 %48-36

0.5 %58-37

0.5 %49-38

0.4 %42-39

1.1 %122-40

0.3 %36-41

0.4 %40-42

0.3 %38-43

0.3 %35-44

0.5 %57-45

0.3 %31-46

0.3 %35-47

0.3 %35-48

0.3 %30-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total







- 194 -






LabelValue

14.5 %1577-0

4.8 %520-1

5.5 %596-2

5.4 %590-3

4.6 %504-4

4.9 %527-5

3.9 %425-6

2.9 %318-7

3.0 %327-8

2.3 %251-9

4.1 %440-10

1.8 %197-11

2.0 %220-12

1.7 %186-13

1.5 %163-14

2.0 %222-15

1.1 %122-16

1.1 %117-17

1.2 %135-18

1.0 %114-19

2.2 %234-20

1.0 %105-21

0.8 %88-22

0.7 %71-23

0.5 %56-24

1.2 %130-25

0.6 %70-26

0.6 %61-27

0.7 %71-28

0.5 %56-29

1.2 %132-30

- 195 -


LabelValue

0.5 %56-31

0.5 %54-32

0.4 %46-33

0.5 %56-34

0.6 %68-35

0.3 %31-36

0.3 %29-37

0.4 %41-38

0.4 %40-39

1.0 %104-40

0.4 %45-41

0.4 %40-42

0.4 %46-43

0.3 %33-44

0.4 %46-45

0.3 %33-46

0.3 %33-47

0.2 %24-48

0.2 %27-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total









- 196 -




LabelValue

29.0 %3154-0

9.6 %1045-1

8.5 %924-2

6.3 %686-3

5.0 %546-4

4.3 %467-5

3.2 %351-6

2.3 %250-7

2.4 %257-8

2.0 %221-9

2.8 %308-10

1.2 %126-11

1.4 %151-12

0.9 %98-13

1.1 %124-14

1.4 %147-15

0.7 %81-16

0.8 %86-17

0.9 %94-18

0.7 %74-19

1.3 %143-20

0.5 %56-21

0.4 %43-22

0.5 %51-23

0.4 %48-24

0.6 %64-25

0.4 %44-26

0.3 %29-27

0.4 %42-28

0.3 %28-29

0.6 %63-30

0.3 %31-31

0.2 %25-32

0.2 %26-33

0.2 %20-34

0.2 %25-35

- 197 -


LabelValue

0.2 %20-36

0.2 %21-37

0.2 %26-38

0.2 %24-39

0.3 %28-40

0.2 %20-41

0.1 %14-42

0.2 %17-43

0.1 %14-44

0.2 %20-45

0.1 %12-46

0.1 %9-47

0.1 %12-48

0.1 %10-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_AGE7: NUMBER OF CLIENTS AGE 65 AND OVER





- 198 -

Total clients, age 65 and over


LabelValue

73.7 %8006-0

9.3 %1015-1

5.6 %609-2

2.6 %283-3

1.4 %153-4

1.5 %159-5

0.8 %91-6

0.5 %55-7

0.5 %49-8

0.3 %37-9

0.7 %73-10

0.2 %22-11

0.2 %23-12

0.1 %13-13

0.1 %14-14

0.2 %20-15

0.1 %8-16

0.1 %7-17

0.1 %14-18

0.0 %3-19

0.3 %28-20

0.1 %6-21

0.1 %11-22

0.1 %8-23

0.1 %7-24

0.1 %9-25

0.1 %7-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %4-28

0.1 %6-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %4-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %2-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-39

0.0 %1-41

- 199 -


LabelValue

0.0 %3-44

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %3-46

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %4-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %2-53

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %1-59

0.0 %1-60

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_AGE9: TOTAL NUMBER OF CLIENTS-AGE





Total clients (age subtotal)

- 200 -


LabelValue

1.4 %150-0

0.8 %85-1

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %146-3

1.5 %161-4

1.6 %176-5

2.1 %225-6

1.6 %173-7

1.8 %197-8

1.1 %115-9

3.0 %327-10

1.2 %129-11

2.3 %254-12

1.2 %129-13

1.7 %182-14

2.2 %243-15

1.6 %178-16

1.2 %135-17

1.5 %160-18

1.1 %115-19

2.4 %257-20

1.2 %129-21

1.2 %131-22

0.9 %97-23

1.3 %142-24

1.8 %191-25

0.9 %99-26

0.9 %96-27

1.0 %108-28

0.7 %71-29

1.7 %189-30

0.7 %76-31

0.9 %94-32

0.6 %64-33

0.8 %91-34

1.3 %145-35

0.8 %82-36

0.6 %65-37

0.7 %80-38

0.5 %59-39

1.4 %148-40

0.4 %48-41

- 201 -


LabelValue

0.6 %61-42

0.5 %58-43

0.4 %48-44

1.0 %106-45

0.4 %45-46

0.4 %47-47

0.5 %55-48

0.4 %40-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_RE1: NUMBER OF CLIENTS/WHITE





Total clients , white (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

6.3 %683-0

2.7 %294-1

3.1 %341-2

3.2 %346-3

- 202 -


LabelValue

3.1 %333-4

3.1 %333-5

2.9 %318-6

2.5 %270-7

2.8 %305-8

2.2 %238-9

3.1 %342-10

1.9 %201-11

2.3 %252-12

1.5 %159-13

2.0 %213-14

2.1 %225-15

1.5 %168-16

1.5 %164-17

1.5 %159-18

1.4 %149-19

1.7 %185-20

1.1 %115-21

1.0 %110-22

1.0 %109-23

1.1 %121-24

1.3 %137-25

0.9 %96-26

0.7 %80-27

0.9 %94-28

0.9 %95-29

1.4 %155-30

0.8 %83-31

0.6 %66-32

0.6 %65-33

0.5 %57-34

0.9 %103-35

0.5 %58-36

0.5 %59-37

0.5 %57-38

0.5 %49-39

1.1 %116-40

0.5 %53-41

0.6 %63-42

0.6 %63-43

0.5 %52-44

0.6 %68-45

- 203 -


LabelValue

0.4 %47-46

0.5 %57-47

0.5 %52-48

0.3 %37-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_RE2: NUMBER OF CLIENTS/BLACK





Total clients, black (not of Hispanic origin)


LabelValue

26.0 %2826-0

9.0 %980-1

7.2 %781-2

4.9 %527-3

3.7 %398-4

3.6 %394-5

2.9 %318-6

2.4 %265-7

- 204 -


LabelValue

2.3 %255-8

1.6 %174-9

2.7 %288-10

1.3 %136-11

1.2 %135-12

1.2 %130-13

0.9 %99-14

1.5 %161-15

0.9 %102-16

0.8 %92-17

1.0 %108-18

0.7 %77-19

1.5 %159-20

0.6 %61-21

0.5 %59-22

0.5 %59-23

0.7 %72-24

0.9 %103-25

0.4 %48-26

0.5 %55-27

0.4 %47-28

0.4 %44-29

0.7 %81-30

0.4 %39-31

0.3 %38-32

0.3 %29-33

0.3 %35-34

0.6 %60-35

0.3 %30-36

0.3 %31-37

0.5 %51-38

0.2 %26-39

0.6 %70-40

0.2 %25-41

0.3 %31-42

0.2 %22-43

0.3 %28-44

0.2 %23-45

0.2 %20-46

0.2 %21-47

0.3 %28-48

0.2 %18-49

- 205 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_RE3: NUMBER OF CLIENTS/HISPANIC





Total clients, Hispanic


LabelValue

40.5 %4398-0

11.8 %1278-1

8.1 %882-2

5.1 %553-3

3.6 %390-4

3.5 %379-5

2.3 %252-6

1.5 %160-7

1.6 %175-8

1.1 %124-9

1.9 %203-10

0.8 %83-11

- 206 -


LabelValue

0.9 %99-12

0.7 %77-13

0.7 %74-14

0.9 %94-15

0.6 %62-16

0.5 %51-17

0.5 %57-18

0.3 %38-19

0.8 %86-20

0.5 %52-21

0.5 %50-22

0.3 %31-23

0.3 %30-24

0.5 %52-25

0.2 %26-26

0.2 %22-27

0.3 %28-28

0.2 %21-29

0.5 %57-30

0.2 %26-31

0.1 %16-32

0.1 %16-33

0.1 %15-34

0.3 %32-35

0.1 %13-36

0.1 %12-37

0.2 %23-38

0.2 %21-39

0.3 %32-40

0.1 %10-41

0.1 %14-42

0.1 %12-43

0.1 %10-44

0.1 %16-45

0.1 %13-46

0.1 %12-47

0.1 %13-48

0.2 %21-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 207 -





T_RE4: NUMBER OF CLIENTS ASIAN OR PACIFIC





Total clients , Asian or Pacific Islander


LabelValue

83.7 %9087-0

7.8 %843-1

2.8 %309-2

1.5 %158-3

0.7 %76-4

0.6 %70-5

0.3 %32-6

0.3 %35-7

0.2 %22-8

0.1 %11-9

0.3 %28-10

0.1 %11-11

0.1 %8-12

0.1 %7-13

0.1 %8-14

0.1 %8-15

0.1 %7-16

- 208 -


LabelValue

0.0 %5-17

0.0 %5-18

0.0 %2-19

0.1 %10-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %2-22

0.0 %3-23

0.0 %2-24

0.0 %5-25

0.0 %2-26

0.0 %3-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %2-31

0.0 %1-32

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %1-38

0.0 %1-40

0.0 %3-41

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %2-45

0.0 %2-46

0.0 %1-47

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-49

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-51

0.0 %2-53

0.0 %1-61

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



• Mean: 0.71• Median: 0.00

- 209 -

• Mode: 0.00• Minimum: 0• Maximum: 335• Standard Deviation: 5.30


T_RE5: NUMBER OF CLIENTS AMERICAN INDIAN/A.N.





Total clients, American Indian/Alaskan Native


LabelValue

73.0 %7926-0

10.0 %1085-1

4.7 %513-2

2.5 %268-3

1.5 %159-4

1.2 %131-5

0.8 %85-6

0.5 %49-7

0.7 %73-8

0.4 %45-9

0.5 %59-10

0.3 %32-11

0.3 %30-12

0.1 %13-13

0.2 %18-14

0.3 %29-15

0.1 %12-16

0.1 %15-17

0.1 %16-18

0.1 %10-19

0.1 %13-20

- 210 -


LabelValue

0.1 %8-21

0.1 %10-22

0.1 %8-23

0.0 %4-24

0.1 %16-25

0.0 %3-26

0.1 %6-27

0.1 %7-28

0.1 %8-29

0.1 %9-30

0.0 %3-31

0.1 %8-32

0.0 %3-33

0.0 %2-34

0.1 %6-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %3-38

0.0 %2-39

0.1 %7-40

0.0 %3-41

0.0 %3-42

0.0 %2-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %3-46

0.0 %4-47

0.0 %1-49

0.1 %7-50

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 211 -


T_RE6: NUMBER OF CLIENTS OF OTHER RACE/ETHNIC





Total clients , other race/ethnicity


LabelValue

86.4 %9378-0

5.5 %594-1

2.3 %245-2

1.2 %135-3

0.9 %93-4

0.6 %65-5

0.5 %50-6

0.3 %32-7

0.2 %22-8

0.2 %19-9

0.2 %22-10

0.2 %18-11

0.1 %14-12

0.1 %12-13

0.0 %4-14

0.1 %12-15

0.1 %9-16

0.0 %3-17

0.0 %4-18

0.0 %5-19

0.1 %6-20

0.0 %2-21

0.0 %5-22

0.1 %6-23

0.0 %1-24

- 212 -


LabelValue

0.0 %2-25

0.0 %1-27

0.1 %6-29

0.0 %3-30

0.0 %1-31

0.0 %1-34

0.0 %1-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-40

0.0 %1-42

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %2-48

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-53

0.0 %1-54

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %3-60

0.0 %1-62

0.0 %1-70

0.0 %1-71

0.0 %1-73

0.0 %1-75

0.0 %1-84

0.0 %1-87

0.0 %1-90

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_RE8: TOTAL NUMBER OF CLIENTS-RACE

- 213 -





Total clients (race/ethnicity subtotal)


LabelValue

1.4 %150-0

0.8 %85-1

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %146-3

1.5 %161-4

1.6 %176-5

2.1 %225-6

1.6 %173-7

1.8 %197-8

1.1 %115-9

3.0 %327-10

1.2 %129-11

2.3 %254-12

1.2 %129-13

1.7 %182-14

2.2 %243-15

1.6 %178-16

1.2 %135-17

1.5 %160-18

1.1 %115-19

2.4 %257-20

1.2 %129-21

1.2 %131-22

0.9 %97-23

1.3 %142-24

1.8 %191-25

0.9 %99-26

0.9 %96-27

1.0 %108-28

- 214 -


LabelValue

0.7 %71-29

1.7 %189-30

0.7 %76-31

0.9 %94-32

0.6 %64-33

0.8 %91-34

1.3 %145-35

0.8 %82-36

0.6 %65-37

0.7 %80-38

0.5 %59-39

1.4 %148-40

0.4 %48-41

0.6 %61-42

0.5 %58-43

0.4 %48-44

1.0 %106-45

0.4 %45-46

0.4 %47-47

0.5 %55-48

0.4 %40-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_SEX1: NUMBER OF MALE CLIENTS



Column 1. Enter the number of active clients for each age, race, and sex

- 215 -

category in Column 1. For each category with no clients, enter zero, "0"


Total clients, male


LabelValue

8.1 %876-0

1.3 %144-1

2.0 %220-2

2.1 %224-3

2.3 %250-4

2.4 %262-5

2.1 %226-6

1.9 %203-7

2.1 %229-8

1.8 %196-9

2.5 %272-10

1.5 %168-11

2.2 %236-12

1.5 %161-13

2.0 %220-14

2.0 %222-15

1.5 %161-16

1.6 %170-17

1.8 %198-18

1.1 %122-19

2.0 %216-20

1.0 %110-21

1.2 %129-22

1.0 %105-23

1.2 %134-24

1.3 %145-25

1.0 %105-26

1.0 %113-27

1.0 %105-28

0.8 %87-29

1.2 %132-30

0.8 %84-31

0.8 %92-32

0.5 %54-33

- 216 -


LabelValue

0.6 %70-34

1.1 %117-35

0.7 %75-36

0.5 %58-37

0.7 %72-38

0.5 %58-39

1.3 %137-40

0.4 %44-41

0.6 %64-42

0.4 %42-43

0.4 %41-44

0.7 %78-45

0.4 %46-46

0.6 %68-47

0.4 %47-48

0.3 %37-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_SEX2: NUMBER OF FEMALE CLIENTS





- 217 -

Total clients, female


LabelValue

13.3 %1448-0

4.6 %496-1

4.9 %527-2

4.3 %466-3

4.1 %445-4

4.1 %442-5

3.7 %403-6

2.9 %315-7

3.5 %385-8

2.2 %241-9

3.4 %373-10

1.9 %210-11

2.3 %245-12

1.7 %186-13

1.6 %170-14

2.2 %238-15

1.6 %176-16

1.1 %122-17

1.3 %141-18

0.9 %97-19

1.9 %211-20

0.9 %98-21

1.0 %106-22

0.8 %83-23

0.8 %87-24

1.3 %145-25

0.6 %70-26

0.6 %70-27

0.7 %79-28

0.7 %78-29

1.2 %131-30

0.5 %51-31

0.7 %77-32

0.5 %56-33

0.6 %60-34

0.9 %94-35

0.5 %50-36

0.3 %31-37

0.5 %51-38

0.4 %46-39

- 218 -


LabelValue

0.8 %84-40

0.3 %35-41

0.4 %45-42

0.5 %51-43

0.3 %37-44

0.5 %50-45

0.3 %33-46

0.3 %30-47

0.4 %40-48

0.3 %33-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





T_SEX4: TOTAL NUMBER OF CLIENTS-SEX





Total clients (sex subtotal)


LabelValue

1.4 %150-0

0.8 %85-1

- 219 -


LabelValue

1.2 %129-2

1.3 %146-3

1.5 %161-4

1.6 %176-5

2.1 %225-6

1.6 %173-7

1.8 %197-8

1.1 %115-9

3.0 %327-10

1.2 %129-11

2.3 %254-12

1.2 %129-13

1.7 %182-14

2.2 %243-15

1.6 %178-16

1.2 %135-17

1.5 %160-18

1.1 %115-19

2.4 %257-20

1.2 %129-21

1.2 %131-22

0.9 %97-23

1.3 %142-24

1.8 %191-25

0.9 %99-26

0.9 %96-27

1.0 %108-28

0.7 %71-29

1.7 %189-30

0.7 %76-31

0.9 %94-32

0.6 %64-33

0.8 %91-34

1.3 %145-35

0.8 %82-36

0.6 %65-37

0.7 %80-38

0.5 %59-39

1.4 %148-40

0.4 %48-41

0.6 %61-42

0.5 %58-43

- 220 -


LabelValue

0.4 %48-44

1.0 %106-45

0.4 %45-46

0.4 %47-47

0.5 %55-48

0.4 %40-49

Missing Data

0.5 %56MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





PREGPCT: PERCENTAGE OF CLIENTS PREGNANT


a. Pregnant


LabelValue

16.5 %1787-0

8.3 %906-1

5.6 %603-2

3.5 %376-3

2.1 %232-4

2.2 %236-5

1.2 %130-6

0.9 %95-7

0.7 %79-8

0.3 %35-9

0.8 %91-10

0.3 %29-11

0.1 %15-12

- 221 -


LabelValue

0.5 %55-13

0.2 %24-14

0.2 %25-15

0.1 %10-16

0.2 %21-17

0.1 %6-18

0.1 %12-19

0.2 %20-20

0.1 %9-21

0.1 %8-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %4-24

0.2 %19-25

0.0 %1-26

0.0 %5-27

0.0 %1-28

0.0 %3-29

0.0 %4-30

0.0 %3-32

0.1 %10-33

0.0 %2-34

0.0 %3-35

0.0 %1-36

0.0 %3-38

0.0 %5-40

0.0 %1-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-46

0.1 %10-50

0.0 %1-52

0.0 %2-54

0.0 %2-56

0.0 %1-57

0.0 %4-60

0.0 %4-67

0.0 %1-68

Missing Data

54.4 %5911MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 222 -





DEPPCT: PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN W/ DEP CHILDREN

b. Women with dependent children


LabelValue

6.2 %670-0

1.0 %108-1

1.0 %113-2

1.5 %158-3

1.2 %135-4

2.0 %216-5

1.6 %170-6

1.7 %187-7

2.0 %219-8

1.5 %166-9

3.2 %349-10

2.0 %216-11

1.5 %166-12

2.4 %265-13

2.1 %226-14

2.3 %246-15

1.4 %149-16

2.1 %226-17

1.4 %156-18

1.4 %152-19

3.5 %384-20

1.0 %112-21

1.1 %118-22

1.0 %112-23

0.9 %96-24

2.4 %264-25

0.6 %64-26

- 223 -


LabelValue

0.8 %92-27

0.5 %56-28

1.0 %112-29

1.3 %141-30

0.4 %45-31

0.6 %60-32

1.3 %144-33

0.3 %28-34

0.6 %66-35

0.4 %43-36

0.2 %27-37

0.6 %60-38

0.2 %21-39

1.1 %117-40

0.2 %19-41

0.2 %24-42

0.2 %27-43

0.2 %25-44

0.2 %23-45

0.1 %12-46

0.1 %13-47

0.1 %6-48

0.1 %7-49

Missing Data

31.0 %3363MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





INJPCT: PERCENTAGE OF INJECTION DRUG USERS

On October 1, 1997, about how many of the clients recorded in the TOTAL box

- 224 -

at Q.12g were:

c. Injection drugs users at the time of admission


LabelValue

8.9 %968-0

2.8 %305-1

2.7 %288-2

2.7 %291-3

1.9 %204-4

3.2 %346-5

1.9 %206-6

1.7 %182-7

1.8 %191-8

1.2 %128-9

3.0 %328-10

1.1 %116-11

0.8 %84-12

1.3 %137-13

1.3 %137-14

1.4 %153-15

0.5 %53-16

1.0 %107-17

0.7 %77-18

0.5 %50-19

1.5 %165-20

0.6 %60-21

0.4 %46-22

0.4 %42-23

0.4 %47-24

1.1 %120-25

0.3 %29-26

0.4 %41-27

0.3 %30-28

0.4 %46-29

0.7 %76-30

0.4 %42-31

0.2 %24-32

0.9 %99-33

0.1 %11-34

0.3 %35-35

0.2 %22-36

0.1 %11-37

- 225 -


LabelValue

0.4 %48-38

0.1 %9-39

0.7 %74-40

0.2 %20-41

0.1 %14-42

0.2 %25-43

0.2 %18-44

0.3 %36-45

0.1 %11-46

0.1 %12-47

0.1 %12-48

0.0 %5-49

Missing Data

41.5 %4511MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





TBPCT: PERCENTAGE OF CLIENTS W/ TUBERCULOSIS


d. Known as having an active case of tuberculosis (TB)


LabelValue

19.6 %2127-0

2.8 %306-1

1.4 %149-2

0.8 %82-3

0.6 %61-4

0.7 %78-5

- 226 -


LabelValue

0.2 %27-6

0.3 %29-7

0.2 %24-8

0.1 %16-9

0.2 %27-10

0.1 %11-11

0.0 %3-12

0.1 %12-13

0.0 %5-14

0.0 %3-15

0.0 %1-16

0.0 %4-17

0.0 %2-18

0.1 %10-20

0.0 %1-21

0.0 %1-22

0.0 %2-23

0.0 %3-24

0.0 %5-25

0.0 %1-27

0.0 %1-29

0.0 %2-30

0.0 %1-33

0.0 %3-40

0.0 %1-45

0.0 %1-50

0.0 %1-56

0.0 %2-67

0.0 %1-70

0.2 %19-100

Missing Data

72.2 %7838MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 227 -


HIVPCT: PERCENTAGE OF CLIENTS WITH HIV


e. HIV positive


LabelValue

12.2 %1326-0

4.8 %519-1

3.7 %403-2

2.9 %312-3

2.1 %226-4

2.8 %299-5

1.7 %190-6

1.1 %122-7

1.2 %126-8

0.6 %64-9

1.5 %165-10

0.5 %49-11

0.4 %45-12

0.6 %68-13

0.4 %47-14

0.5 %55-15

0.2 %18-16

0.4 %47-17

0.1 %15-18

0.1 %16-19

0.7 %73-20

0.1 %16-21

0.1 %9-22

0.0 %5-23

0.1 %6-24

0.4 %41-25

0.1 %7-26

0.1 %10-27

0.0 %5-28

0.1 %7-29

0.2 %19-30

0.1 %8-31

0.1 %14-32

- 228 -


LabelValue

0.2 %18-33

0.0 %3-34

0.1 %7-35

0.0 %2-36

0.0 %2-37

0.0 %3-38

0.0 %1-39

0.2 %19-40

0.0 %1-41

0.0 %4-42

0.0 %3-43

0.0 %2-44

0.0 %3-45

0.0 %4-47

0.0 %1-49

0.1 %13-50

0.0 %1-53

Missing Data

58.8 %6383MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





PREVPCT: PERCENTAGE OF CLIENTS WHO PREV RCD TX


f. Clients who had previously received substance abuse treatment from you oranother facility

- 229 -


LabelValue

1.6 %173-0

0.3 %31-1

0.4 %48-2

0.4 %39-3

0.5 %49-4

0.6 %65-5

0.5 %51-6

0.4 %45-7

0.6 %61-8

0.5 %58-9

1.6 %178-10

0.6 %69-11

0.4 %46-12

0.8 %85-13

0.6 %61-14

0.9 %95-15

0.5 %53-16

0.8 %92-17

0.6 %65-18

0.5 %56-19

2.2 %235-20

0.5 %59-21

0.6 %61-22

0.5 %55-23

0.5 %55-24

2.1 %232-25

0.4 %44-26

0.7 %71-27

0.5 %52-28

1.0 %105-29

2.1 %227-30

0.5 %54-31

0.5 %55-32

2.0 %213-33

0.5 %52-34

1.0 %112-35

0.7 %75-36

0.6 %61-37

1.1 %123-38

0.5 %49-39

2.5 %276-40

0.4 %41-41

- 230 -


LabelValue

0.7 %76-42

0.8 %86-43

0.7 %72-44

0.7 %74-45

0.4 %44-46

0.6 %67-47

0.6 %66-48

0.3 %30-49

Missing Data

16.6 %1806MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





MGDPCT: PERCENT OF CLIENTS COVERED BY MGD CARE


g. Covered by managed care arrangements


LabelValue

11.1 %1209-0

1.2 %125-1

1.1 %117-2

1.1 %119-3

0.8 %92-4

1.8 %197-5

0.8 %91-6

0.7 %74-7

0.7 %75-8

0.7 %75-9

- 231 -


LabelValue

1.9 %202-10

0.6 %64-11

0.5 %51-12

0.7 %78-13

0.7 %71-14

1.1 %120-15

0.3 %33-16

0.7 %78-17

0.4 %43-18

0.4 %43-19

1.5 %167-20

0.3 %33-21

0.3 %32-22

0.2 %24-23

0.3 %28-24

1.1 %115-25

0.2 %27-26

0.3 %32-27

0.2 %22-28

0.4 %41-29

1.0 %113-30

0.2 %26-31

0.2 %18-32

0.8 %85-33

0.1 %7-34

0.3 %35-35

0.3 %29-36

0.1 %7-37

0.4 %42-38

0.2 %19-39

0.8 %92-40

0.1 %16-41

0.2 %23-42

0.3 %28-43

0.2 %17-44

0.3 %28-45

0.1 %6-46

0.2 %21-47

0.2 %22-48

0.1 %12-49

Missing Data

48.2 %5233MISSING-9

- 232 -


LabelValue

100%10,860Total





CJPCT: PERCENT OF COURT REFERRED CLIENTS


h. Criminal justice referred clients (excluding DUI/DWI)


LabelValue

5.7 %620-0

1.0 %109-1

1.3 %137-2

1.3 %137-3

1.0 %105-4

2.0 %221-5

1.2 %133-6

1.2 %127-7

1.1 %123-8

1.0 %107-9

2.7 %293-10

1.1 %122-11

0.8 %85-12

1.4 %150-13

1.0 %112-14

1.5 %165-15

0.6 %63-16

1.4 %149-17

0.9 %95-18

0.8 %83-19

- 233 -


LabelValue

2.8 %300-20

0.7 %80-21

0.6 %70-22

0.6 %68-23

0.6 %61-24

1.9 %209-25

0.5 %57-26

0.7 %74-27

0.5 %55-28

0.9 %95-29

1.3 %146-30

0.5 %55-31

0.5 %49-32

1.2 %132-33

0.2 %20-34

0.7 %79-35

0.5 %49-36

0.3 %28-37

0.5 %58-38

0.3 %28-39

1.5 %164-40

0.3 %38-41

0.4 %40-42

0.5 %54-43

0.4 %43-44

0.6 %67-45

0.3 %35-46

0.4 %47-47

0.4 %42-48

0.2 %19-49

Missing Data

25.8 %2807MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 234 -



ADMITNUM: TOTAL NUMBER OF ADMISSIONS FOR SA TX

From October 1, 1996 to September 30, 1997 or during the most recent 12-month period for which information is available what wasthis facility's: a. Total number of substance abuse treatment admissions


LabelValue

0.7 %72-0

0.1 %9-1

0.3 %36-2

0.2 %25-3

0.3 %38-4

0.4 %41-5

0.3 %36-6

0.2 %22-7

0.3 %32-8

0.2 %20-9

0.7 %75-10

0.1 %14-11

0.5 %53-12

0.3 %29-13

0.2 %24-14

0.8 %83-15

0.4 %39-16

0.2 %25-17

0.3 %31-18

0.3 %31-19

0.8 %88-20

0.3 %30-21

0.3 %29-22

0.2 %25-23

0.5 %49-24

0.7 %76-25

0.2 %24-26

0.2 %22-27

0.3 %34-28

0.2 %26-29

1.1 %115-30

0.3 %35-31

0.3 %38-32

0.3 %36-33

- 235 -


LabelValue

0.3 %28-34

0.7 %72-35

0.4 %45-36

0.3 %32-37

0.3 %35-38

0.2 %25-39

1.2 %126-40

0.3 %30-41

0.4 %47-42

0.2 %27-43

0.3 %37-44

0.6 %64-45

0.3 %29-46

0.4 %40-47

0.4 %48-48

0.2 %23-49

Missing Data

6.0 %657MISSING-9

100%10,860Total





ADMITEST: IS TOTAL ADMIS NO. ESTIMATE OR ACTUAL

Is the number entered in: a. Q.18a an actual admissions count for the year or your best estimate?


LabelValue


46.5 %5046BEST ESTIMATE2

Missing Data

7.4 %799MISSING-9

100%10,860Total


- 236 -



UNDUPEST: IS UNDUPLICTD COUNT ESTIMATE OR ACTUAL

Is the number entered in: b. Q.18b an actual unduplicated count for the year or your best estimate?


LabelValue


55.4 %6021BEST ESTIMATE2

Missing Data

9.3 %1015MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




T_AG1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - T_AGE1


LabelValue

96.0 %10427VALUE NOT IMPUTED0

3.8 %412VALUE IMPUTED1

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



- 237 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 238 -



LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




HI_AG1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - HI_AGE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 239 -




LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %22MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 240 -




RC_AG1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - RC_AGE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



- 241 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 242 -

OP_AG1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - O_AGE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 243 -




LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




T_RE1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - T_RE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 244 -






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



- 245 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 246 -

HI_RE1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - H_RE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 247 -




LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 248 -




RC_RE1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - R_RE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



- 249 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 250 -



LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OP_RE1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - O_RE1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 251 -




LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 252 -






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




T_SX1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - T_SEX1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




T_SX2FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - T_SEX2


LabelValue



- 253 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




HI_SX1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - H_SEX1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 254 -

RC_SX1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - R_SEX1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OP_SX1FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - O_SEX1


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 255 -


OP_SX2FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - O_SX2


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 256 -






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



- 257 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 258 -



LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total



- 259 -




LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total

- 260 -






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



- 261 -


LabelValue

Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




T_SX4FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - H_SEX4


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total






LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 262 -



LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




OP_SX4FL: IMPUTATION FLAG - O_SEX4


LabelValue



Missing Data

0.2 %21MISSING-9

100%10,860Total




- 263 -

A.1

APPENDIX A

UFDS 1997 QUESTIONNAIRE

This Appendix contains a complete copy of the1997 UFDS questionnaire that was sent by

mail to all facilities. As noted in Chapter 1, 82percent of the 10,860 responding treatmentfacilities completed this version of thequestionnaire.

A slightly abbreviated version of the mailquestionnaire was administered by telephone tothose facilities that, after repeated efforts de-tailed in Chapter 1, had not completed the sur-vey. The telephone interview was conducted

using computer-assisted telephone interviewing(CATI). A printed version of the CATI inter-view is not included here because it containsembedded instructions and skip patterns thatmake it difficult to read.

The CATI interview included all items fromthe mail survey except the detailed check list ofsubstance abuse services (Question 20). How-ever, the section of this check list concerningprograms for special groups (items 30-34) wasasked of telephone respondents.

P T O A (Office Use Only)

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FORM APPROVED: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

OMB No: 0930-0106APPROVAL EXPIRES: 8/31/99

DRUG AND ALCOHOL SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM (DASIS)UNIFORM FACILITY DATA SET (UFDS)

OCTOBER 1, 1997

This questionnaire asks about the facility listed below. Please check the accuracy of the information. Updateitems that are blank or inaccurate by entering the correct information in the space provided on the lower half ofthis page. If you are reporting data for the first time, please provide all of the information requested.

IF NO CHANGES ARE NEEDED (ALL INFORMATION IS COMPLETE AND CORRECT), MARK (X) THIS BOX ÷ GG

Don’t Don’tKnow Know

STATE ID -1 ~ NFR ID - -1 ~

EIN ID:** -1 ~ FDA ID - -1 ~

**The EIN ID number is your employer identification number or your federal tax identification number. Your accounting or personnel departments may have this number.

Facility Director's Name

Facility Name

Mailing Address

City State ZIP Code

Street Name

City State ZIP Code

County Telephone No. Ext. (if any)

Facility Director's Telephone No. Ext. (if any) Facility Fax Number: TTY/TDD Number:

ICPSR

This questionnaire was converted to PDF by an outside agency.

Why is completing this questionnaire important?

Your participation makes a difference. The UFDS survey is the ONLY source ofdata on ALL known substance abuse treatment and prevention programs in thenation. When substance abuse policy makers and program managers need up-to-date national information on characteristics of substance abuse programs and thenumbers and types of clients served, they rely on the UFDS. UFDS data are usedto formulate the Nation’s annual drug control strategy and to make many otherimportant decisions regarding substance abuse policy.

This survey is sponsored by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health ServicesAdministration (SAMHSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

19191

Instructions

C The reference date for UFDS is October 1, 1997.

C Use a # 2 pencil. If you wish to change an answer, please erase cleanly.

C See example below for the proper way to record a number in a box.

C Return the completed questionnaire in the envelope provided.

If you have any questions concerning this questionnaire, or if you needadditional blank forms, contact:

MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH, INC.1-888-324-UFDS (8337)

Correct Incorrect

Public burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 50 minutes per response for treatment providers and 3 minutes per response for nontreatment providers (e.g., prevention andeducation), including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Sendcomments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to SAMHSA Reports Clearance Officer; Room 16-105,Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currentlyvalid OMB control number. The OMB number for this project is 0930-0106.

1

1. On October 1, 1997 was the facility named on the 3. Does this facility operate or participate in a cover providing substance abuse treatment, hotline that provides substance abuse prevention, administrative, or other counseling and referral services?nontreatment services?

~ 1 Yes ÷÷ SKIP TO Q.2

~ 2 No

1a. (If No) When did this facility close or stop and hours of operation. If 24 hours, check theproviding substance abuse services? RECORD box.MONTH AND YEAR

MONTH: |___|___|

YEAR: 19 |___|___| SKIP TO Q.27, PAGE 10

~ -1 Don't Know

2. Who is the owner of this substance abusefacility?

MARK ONE ONLY services were provided by this facility at this site?

~ 1 A Private-for-Profit Organization

~ 2 A Private Non-Profit Organization

~ 3 State Government SKIP TO

~ 4 Local County or Community Q.3

Government

~ 5 Tribal Government

~ 6 Federal Government

2a. Which federal government agency?

MARK ONE ONLY

~ 1 Department of Veterans Affairs

~ 2 Department of Defense

~ 3 Bureau of Prisons

~ 4 Indian Health Service

~ 5 Other (Specify:

)

911 is not considered a hotline

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No ÷÷ SKIP TO Q.4

3a. Please enter the hotline telephone number(s)

24PHONE NUMBER(S): HOURS OF OPERATION HOURS

( )- ~ Weekdays

~ Weekends

( )- ~ Weekdays

~ Weekends

4. On October 1, 1997, which of the following

MARK ALL THAT APPLY

~ 1 Substance Abuse Treatment (services that focus on initiating and maintaining an individual’srecovery from substance abuse and on averting relapse, including detoxification)

~ 2 Substance Abuse Prevention (prevention activities directed at individuals not identified to be in need of treatment, such as information disseminationor education)

~ 3 Other Substance Abuse Services (such as intake, assessment, and referral)

~ 4 Administrative Services (such as billing, personnel, and scheduling)

5. Did you check box 1 in Q.4?

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No ÷ SKIP TO Q.27, PAGE 10

5a. Is a drunk driving or DUI/DWI program the ONLYsubstance abuse service provided by this facility?

1 ~ Yes ÷ SKIP TO Q.27, PAGE 10

2 ~ No

2

6. Which ONE category best describes the SETTING of 7. Is this facility owned or operated by a managedthis substance abuse treatment facility? care organization (for example, an HMO)?

MARK ONE~ 1 General hospital, may include an

outpatient substance abuse unit on site

~ 2 Psychiatric hospital, may include anoutpatient substance abuse unit on site

~ 3 Other specialized hospital, mayinclude an outpatient substanceabuse unit on site (for example,alcoholism, maternity, children’s,orthopedic)

~ 4 Solo practice SKIPTO Q.7

~ 5 Group practice

~ 6 School (elementary, secondary,college/university)

~ 7 Jail, prison or juvenile detentioncenter

~ 8 Other criminal justice (TASC,pretrial diversion, court referral,probation, parole, communitycorrections)

~ 9 Other setting

6a. More specifically would you describe this facility as:

MARK YES OR NO FOR EACHYES NO1 ~ 2 ~ a. OUTPATIENT substance abuse treatment

facility

1 ~ 2 ~ b. Community MENTAL health center or othermental health facility that provides a variety

of services

1 ~ 2 ~ c. Community Health Center, including MigrantHealth Center, Urban Indian Program, Health Care for the Homeless Center

1 ~ 2 ~ d. Halfway House

1 ~ 2 ~ e. Therapeutic Community

1 ~ 2 ~ f. Other RESIDENTIAL substance abusetreatment facility

1 ~ 2 ~ g. Community or religious organization/agency that provides a variety of social services

1 ~ 2 ~ h. Other (Specify: )

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No

8. On October 1, 1997, did this facility have lettersof agreement or contracts with managed careorganizations for providing substance abusetreatment services?

~ 1 Yes, had formal written agreements or contractswith managed care organizations

~ 2 No formal written agreements or contracts withmanaged care organizations ÷÷ SKIP TO Q.9

~ -1 Don’t know ÷÷ SKIP TO Q.9

8a. With how many managed care organizationsdid you have formal written agreements orcontracts?

Number:

9. On October 1, 1997 was this facility structuredas a parent organization or master site with oneor more affiliate sites that provide substanceabuse treatment services?

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No ÷ SKIP TO Q.10, PAGE 3

9a. On October 1, 1997, how many affiliate sites didthis facility have that provide substance abusetreatment services?

Number:

3

10. On October 1, 1997, was this facility an affiliate of a parent organization or master site?

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No ÷ SKIP TO Q.10b

10a. Please provide the following information for the parent organization/master site.

Organization:

Contact Name:

Mailing Address:

City: State:

ZIP: Telephone Number: ( ) -

10b. The rest of this questionnaire should be answered for those services, activities, etc. provided at this siteby the facility listed on the cover of this questionnaire. Parent organizations or master sites should notinclude affiliate sites in their responses. Can you respond for only the services, activities, etc. provided atthis site?

~ 1 Yes ÷SKIP TO Q.11

~ 2 No

10c. If responding for only this site is not possible, for approximately how many sites will you be reporting intotal?

MARK ONE ONLY

~ 2 sites

~ 3-5 sites

~ 6-10 sites

~ More than 10 sites

11. Waiting Lists. If a program is full, does this facility maintain a formal waiting list of people waiting forsubstance abuse services?

CC Formal waiting list: a record of the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of applicants eligible for admission. The list must include the date of application and nature of follow-up contacts.

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No ! SKIP TO Q.12, PAGE 4

11a. On October 1, 1997, how many people were on the waiting list?

Number on Waiting List: ,

4

12. Number of Active Clients on October 1, 1997. In each of the categories listed below, please enter the numberof active clients who were receiving substance abuse treatment at this facility on October 1, 1997:

C DO NOT count codependents, parents, other relatives, friends (i.e., “collaterals”), or other nontreatment clients.IF NONE,

NUMBER CHECK BOX

a. Hospital Inpatients - Detoxification on October 1, 1997and were not discharged that day . . . . . . , ~

b. Hospital Inpatients - Rehabilitation on October 1, 1997and were not dischargedthat day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~

c. Residential (24-Hour Care) - Detoxification on October 1, 1997 and were not discharged that day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~

d. Residential (24-Hour Care) - Rehabilitation on October 1, 1997 and were not dischargedthat day . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~

e. Outpatients (Less Than 24-Hour Care) who received a substance abuse treatment service between September 1 and October 1, 1997 and were still enrolled on October 1,1997. . .DO NOT INCLUDE CLIENTS WHOSE ONLY SERVICE IS ATTENDING A DUI/DWI PROGRAM . . . . . . . . . . , ~

f. Intensive Outpatients* who received a substance abuse treatment service—including daytreatment—between September 1 and October 1, 1997 and were still enrolled on October 1,1997 *(Services provided to a client that last 2 hours or more per day/3 or more days a week) . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~

g. TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS (add a - f) , Q.12g

12h. Are the numbers entered in the TOTAL box Q.12g actual active client counts for October 1, 1997 or your best estimate?

~ 1 Actual count ~ 2 Estimate

13. Approximately what percentage of the clients in the Q.12g TOTAL box were being treated on October 1,1997 for:

a. Alcohol Abuse Only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .00%

b. Drug Abuse Only . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .00%

c. Both Alcohol and Drug Abuse . . . . . . . .00%TOTAL CLIENTS 100 %

14. Did you enter a number larger than zero in either the Hospital Inpatient (Q.12a or Q.12b) or Residential—24Hour Care (Q.12c or Q12.d) categories in Q.12?

~ 1 Yes ~ 2 No ÷÷ SKIP TO Q.15, PAGE 5

14a. On October 1, 1997, how many of the beds at this facility could have been used for:NUMBER OF BEDS

a. Hospital Inpatient Substance Abuse Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~ NONE

b. Non-Hospital Residential (24-Hour) Substance Abuse Treatment . . . . . . . . . . . , ~ NONE

5

CHARACTERISTICS OF ACTIVE CLIENTS ON OCTOBER 1, 1997

15. Please complete the following table for the number of active clients reported in Q.12 (page 4).C Enter the TOTAL from Q.12g into the three TOTAL boxes in Column 1 below.C Column 1. Enter the number of active clients for each age, race, and sex category in Column 1. For each category with no clients, enter zero,

“0."C Columns 2-4. For each age, race, and sex category with a number greater than zero in Column 1 complete Columns 2-4 to show how many

clients were in each of the three types of care. The SUM of each row in Columns 2, 3 and 4 MUST EQUAL the Column 1 total for that row.

NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS BY TYPE OF CARE 1 2 3 4

HOSPITAL INPATIENT RESIDENTIAL (24-HOUR CARE) OUTPATIENTClient Category TOTAL From Q.12a + Q.21b From Q.12c + Q.12d From Q.21e + Q.12f

AGE

Under 18 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

18-20 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

21-24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

25-34 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

35-44 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

45-64 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

65 and Over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Don’t Know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| (from Q.12g)RACE/ETHNICITY

White, not of Hispanic Origin . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Black, not of Hispanic Origin . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Asian or Pacific Islander . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

American Indian/Alaskan Native . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Don’t Know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| (from Q.12g)GENDER

Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

Don’t Know . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__|

TOTAL NUMBER OF ACTIVE CLIENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| |__|,|__|__|__| (from Q.12g)

15a. Are the numbers entered in Q.15 actual active client counts for October 1, 1997 or your best estimate?~ 1 Actual active client counts~ 2 Estimate

6

16. Does this facility dispense the opioid substitutes methadone or LAAM at this site?

~ 1 Yes ÷÷ (Make certain your FDA ID number on the cover has been recorded and is correct)~ 2 No ÷÷ SKIP TO Q.17

16a. On October 1, 1997, approximately how many of the clients in the TOTAL box at Q.12g (page 4) werereceiving:

Number

a. Methadone at this site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___|

b. LAAM at this site . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___|

17. On October 1, 1997, about how many of the clients recorded in the TOTAL box at Q.12g were:

C Provide your answers either as numbers or percentages. Your best estimate is fine. If a reasonable estimate isnot possible, mark the “Unknown” box.

C For 17a and 17b, the number entered should not exceed the total number of females reported in Q.15.C The active clients in Q.12 can be reported more than once in categories a-h below.

Number OR Percentage Unknown

a. Pregnant? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

b. Women with dependent children? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

c. Injection drug users at the time of admission? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

d. Known as having an active case of tuberculosis (TB)? . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

e. HIV positive? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

f. Clients who had previously received substanceabuse treatment from you or another facility? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

g. Covered by managed care arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

h. Criminal justice referred clients (excluding DUI/DWI) . . . . . . . . . . . |___|,|___|___|___| |___|___|___| .00 % ~ -1

18. From October 1, 1996 to September 30, 1997—or during the most recent 12-month period for whichinformation is available— what was this facility’s:

C DO NOT INCLUDE NONTREATMENT CLIENTS12 - MONTH

a. Total number of substance abuse treatment admissions—count every admission for the year, ADMISSIONS which includes each admission for clients readmitted for treatment or clients entering more than one type of care . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|___|,|___|___|___|

b. Unduplicated count of substance abuse treatment clients—count every client treated during that 12 - MONTH time period—both new clients and clients already receiving treatment. HOWEVER, count each CLIENTS client only once, even if a client was readmitted or treated more than once during thetime period. . . . . . . (This count should be no less than the total reported at Q.12g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . |___|___|,|___|___|___|

19. Is the number entered in: Actual BestCount Estimate

a. Q.18a an actual admissions count for the year or your best estimate? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 1 ~ 2

b. Q.18b an actual unduplicated count for the year or your best estimate? . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 1 ~ 2

7

20. As of October 1, 1997, which of these services were being provided at this substance abuse facility?

MARK ALL THAT APPLY Programs for Special GroupsAssessment Services

~ 1 Comprehensive substance abuse assessment/diagnosis

~ 2 Comprehensive mental health assessment/diagnosis (for example, psychological/psychiatricevaluation and testing)

~ 3 Other (Specify: )

Therapy

~ 4 Family counseling~ 5 Group therapy, not including relapse prevention~ 6 Individual therapy~ 7 Pharmacotherapies/prescription medication~ 8 Relapse prevention groups~ 9 Other (Specify: )

Testing (Include testing service even if specimen is sent to outside source for chemical analysis)

~ 10 Blood alcohol testing (including breathalyzer)~ 11 Drug/alcohol urine screening~ 12 Hair analysis~ 13 Hepatitis testing~ 14 HIV testing~ 15 STD testing~ 16 TB screening~ 17 Other (Specify: )

Health Services

~ 18 Family planning~ 19 Medical care (including physical exams)~ 20 Prenatal care~ 21 Perinatal care~ 22 TB treatment~ 23 Health education (for example, nutrition,

contagious diseases, STD other than HIV/AIDS)~ 24 HIV/AIDS education/counseling/support~ 25 Smoking cessation~ 26 Other (Specify: )

Continuing Care~ 27 Aftercare counseling~ 28 Alumni(ae) groups~ 29 Other (Specify: )

~ 30 Adolescents~ 31 Dually-diagnosed (mental and substance abuse

disorders)~ 32 Persons with HIV/AIDS~ 33 Pregnant/Postpartum women~ 34 Other (Specify: )

Transitional Services

~ 35 Assistance with obtaining Social Services(i.e., Medicaid, WIC, SSI, SSDI)

~ 36 Discharge planning~ 37 Employment counseling/training~ 38 Housing assistance~ 32 Referral to other services~ 40 Other (Specify: )

Community Outreach

~ 41 Drug and alcohol education~ 42 Outreach/early intervention~ 43 Media presentations (T.V., radio, brochures)~ 44 Membership in a community partnership

program~ 45 Other (Specify: )

Other Services

~ 46 Academic education/GED classes~ 47 Acupuncture~ 48 Case management services~ 49 Child care~ 50 Communication skills~ 51 Detoxification from substance of abuse~ 52 Domestic violence - family/partner violence

services (physical, sexual and emotional abuse)~ 53 Home visits~ 54 Life skills for independent living~ 55 Outcome follow-up (post-discharge)~ 56 Parenting/family skills development~ 57 Self-help groups, including 12-step programs~ 58 Socialization/recreational services (for example,

scheduled activities such as camping, sportingevents)

~ 59 Transportation assistance to treatment~ 60 Other (Specify: )

8

** Unspecified: Only use if you are unable to distinguish betweenrevenue from managed care and non-managed care sources.DO NOT DOUBLE COUNT REVENUE.

21. Using the MOST RECENT 12 - month fiscal reporting period for which data are available, what was thesubstance abuse treatment revenue or funding for this facility? Include all sources such as clientpayments, insurance, government funds, and donations.

C If these data are obtained from a financial report with the information recorded in thousands of dollars, please remember to add three zeroes when recording these figures.

C If substance abuse treatment revenue is summed together with other revenue, please provide your best estimate for the substance abuse treatment portion.

Total Substance Abuse Treatment Revenue or Funding: $ |___|___|___| , |___|___|___| , |___|___|__| .00

21a. What 12 - month reporting period was used to answer Q.21?

FROM: |___|___| |___|___| 19 |___|___| THROUGH: |___|___| |___|___| 19 |___|___|Month Day Year Month Day Year

22. How much of the substance abuse treatment revenue or funding reported in Q.21 was paid directly to thisfacility by:

C Provide your answers either as numbers or percentages.C If you marked category “6” (Federal government) in Q.2, you should have revenues or funding to report in category “e” below.

REVENUE OR FUNDING SOURCES DOLLAR AMOUNT OR ESTIMATED PERCENT

a. Client payments (self-payment, deductibles, copayments) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %b. Private health insurance

1. Fee-for-service (not HMO, PPO, or managed care) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %2. HMO/PPO/Managed care payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %3. Private health insurance, unspecified** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %

c. Medicaid1. Not managed care—Title XIX, including all Federal, State, and Local

matching Medicaid funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %2. Managed care payments—Title XIX, including all Federal, State, and

Local matching Medicaid funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %3. Medicaid, unspecified** . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %

d. Medicare . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %e. Government funds

1. Federal (for example, VA, CHAMPUS—not including Medicare) . . . . . . . . $ %2. State—including Federal block grants or any other State-only medical

assistance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %3. Local—not including Medicaid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %

f. Other public funds, source unspecified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %g. Other funds (such as funds from charities, donations, fund-raising events) -

(Specify Largest Source: _________________) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %h. Unknown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ %

Total * 100% $

*Should Equal Q.21 Revenue or Funding Amount

9

NFR ID # - ~ -1 Don't Know

State ID # ~ -1 Don't Know

Name

Location Address

City

State ZIP Code |___|___|___|___|___|

Telephone (|__|__|__|)-|__|__|__|-|__|__|__|__|

Ext. (if any)

NFR ID # - ~ -1 Don't Know

State ID # ~ -1 Don't Know

Name

Location Address

City

State ZIP Code |___|___|___|___|___|

Telephone (|__|__|__|)-|__|__|__|-|__|__|__|__|

Ext. (if any)

23. To answer Q.22, did you primarily use:

MARK ONE ONLY~ 1 An audited financial statement for the substance abuse treatment facility on the cover~ 2 An unaudited financial statement for the substance abuse treatment facility on the cover~ 3 The annual budget for the substance abuse treatment facility on the cover~ 4 A financial statement, budget, or records from an administrative parent~ 5 Estimates based on other records, budgets, or statements~ 6 Other estimates

24. Does the revenue or funding information reported in Q.22 include revenues or funding for a site OTHERTHAN the one identified on the cover of this questionnaire?

~ 1 Yes~ 2 No ÷ SKIP TO Q.25

24a. Please complete a block below for each site whose revenue or funding information is included in Q.22. Make a photocopy of this page if more address blocks are needed or send your own printout.

25. Were you able to provide revenue or funding sources in Q.22 for at least 75 percent of the total reportedrevenue?

~ 1 Yes ÷ SKIP TO Q.26, PAGE 10~ 2 No

25a. Is there another organization that can provide the revenue or funding information for your facility?

~ 1 Yes ÷ GO TO Q.25b, PAGE 10~ 2 No ÷

Please explain:

SKIP TO Q.26, PAGE 10

10

Name of Organization

Mailing Address

City State ZIP Code

Name (Contact Person)

Telephone (|__|__|__|)-|__|__|__|-|__|__|__|__| Ext. (if any)

Thank you for your participation. Please return this questionnaire in the envelopeprovided. If you no longer have the envelope, please mail this questionnaire to:

MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH, INC.ATTN: Pat Nemeth

P.O. Box 2393Princeton, NJ 08543-2393

25b. Please provide the following information for that organization.

26. In addition to the funding you received for providing substance abuse treatment services, did you receive any Federal or State funding earmarked for prevention activities during the same 12-month period reported in Q.21a, page 8?

~ 1 Yes

~ 2 No

~ -1 Don’t Know

27. Please provide the following information about the person primarily responsible for completing this form.

1. Name:

2. Telephone Number:(_______) -

3. FAX Number:(_______) - OR ~ No FAX Number

4. Internet Address: OR ~ No Internet Address

28. When completed, you will be able to access the 1997 National Directory and the 1997 UFDS Data Report onthe World Wide Web via SAMHSA’s home page at www.samhsa.gov. If you would like to receive a papercopy of the National Directory or the data report, or the National Directory on diskette, please indicatebelow.

~ 1 National Directory - paper copy~ 2 National Directory - diskette (requires minimum of 8 MB RAM and 386 or higher processor)~ 3 Report of UFDS survey findings - paper copy

Questar Q400707

B.1

APPENDIX B

ORGANIZATIONAL SETTING

Aconsistent goal of UFDS has been to iden-tify treatment setting, a concept that is

subject to a variety of definitions and interpre-tations. Definitions of treatment setting gener-ally fall into three categories. A treatment set-ting may be an organizational setting (e.g., ahospital or mental health center). It may indi-cate a treatment philosophy (e.g., social modelor therapeutic community). Finally, it may indi-cate living arrangements while in treatment(e.g., outpatient, residential, halfway house).These different definitions are driven by themany different needs of data users. For exam-ple, treatment setting may be used by payers toset rates, by treatment professionals to deter-mine levels of care, or by planners to deter-mine system needs.

UFDS planners have tried to incorporate dataelements that permit analysis of treatment set-ting from different viewpoints. These data ele-ments have changed as the questionnaireevolved over time. In general, prior to 1995,organizational setting was collected in a singleenvironment/location/setting question.Treatment philosophy and client livingarrangement were collected in client censusmatrices, which cross-tabulated modality/typeof care with environment/facility location. In1995, the client census matrices weresimplified to reduce the reporting burden, andthe environment/setting/location question wasexpanded to recapture information lost from thematrices.

In the 1997 UFDS survey, treatment setting wascollected in two related questions (Questions 6and 6a; see Appendix A). Respondents wereasked to select which one setting bestdescribed the facility. Options included general

hospital; psychiatric hospital; other specializedhospital; solo practice; group practice; school;jail, prison, or juvenile detention center; othercriminal justice setting; and other setting.Facilities that selected ‘Other setting’ wereasked to describe the facility more specifically,selecting all options that applied from a list thatincluded: outpatient substance abuse treatmentfacility; community mental health center(CMHC); community health center; halfwayhouse; therapeutic community; other residentialsubstance abuse treatment facility; communityor religious organization/agency providing avariety of social services; and other setting.This multiple listing, in conjunction with thecounts of clients in treatment by type of care,was designed to permit flexibility in thedefinition and analysis of treatment setting.

The definition of treatment setting used in thisreport corresponds to that of organizationalsetting. To present facility and client data byorganizational setting, it was necessary toassign each facility to a single setting category.Categories for the first question part of thesetting question (where only one category couldbe checked) were essentially unchanged,although some were combined:

! General hospital (including VA hospitalsthat checked ‘Other specialized hospitals’)

! Psychiatric and other (non-VA) specializedhospitals

! Solo and group practices ! Criminal justice (jail, prison, juvenile

detention, and other criminal justicesettings)

Categories for the second part of the settingquestion, where multiple responses werepermitted, were determined first on the basis of

B.2

whether a larger organizational affiliation wasindicated. Thus facilities indicating that theywere set in a community mental health center,community health center, or community orreligious agency/organization were categorizedas such. Facilities not indicating such anaffiliation were classified as Specialtysubstance abuse treatment facilities. Thesewere further subdivided according to clientliving arrangement (outpatient, residential, ormixed outpatient and residential). Categoriesfor the second question were:

! Community mental health center or othermental health facility

! Community health center! Community or religious agency/organiza-

tion! Specialty substance abuse treatment facility

Outpatient Residential (halfway house, therapeutic

community, other residential substanceabuse treatment facility)

Mixed outpatient and residential

Facilities indicating more than one largeraffiliation (such as both CMHC and communityhealth center) were classified as Mixed/Un-known. This category also included the fewfacilities that indicated that they were schoolsin the first question.

samhda.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com · Terms of Use These data are distributed under the...

Documents

Transcript of samhda.s3-us-gov-west-1.amazonaws.com · Terms of Use These data are distributed under the...