Salmonid Feeding and Growth at Sea 1. Habitats and ...courses.washington.edu/fish450/Lecture...

47
Salmonid Feeding and Growth at Sea 1. Habitats and communities of salmon 2. Diet of salmon 3. Patterns of feeding 4. Growth 5. Density and temperature

Transcript of Salmonid Feeding and Growth at Sea 1. Habitats and ...courses.washington.edu/fish450/Lecture...

  • Salmonid Feeding and Growth at Sea

    1. Habitats and communities of salmon 2. Diet of salmon 3. Patterns of feeding 4. Growth 5. Density and temperature

  • Feeding and growth of salmon at sea

    • Salmon time their seaward migration to take advantage of marine prey

    • Salmon grow rapidly and achieve > 99% of their total weight at sea

    • Salmon diets reflect their size and species, and the prey available to them

    • Growing conditions vary among years, with ocean conditions and salmon density

  • Salmon in the central North Pacific and Bering Sea

    Asia

    Alaska

    British Columbia

    The distributions are large, and overlap broadly between species and populations.

    What is the nature of the region that they occupy?

  • North Pacific Ocean current systems (Dodimead et al. 1963)

  • Approximate area of oceanic domains and prevailing current directions in the Northeast Pacific Ocean (Ware and McFarlane 1989)

  • 0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 45 44 44 42 41 39 38 36

    Latitude

    Perc

    ent o

    f Tot

    alCatches of fishes and squid in gill nets along

    155o W by the Oshoro Maru, July 1984

    n = 3999

    n = 2897

    n = 694

    n = 199 Salmonids

    Pacific Pomfret

    Blue Shark, Albacore, Ommastrephes bartami Tuna, billfish, Mackerel, mahi mahi, Yellowtail

    Open ocean communities

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    herrin

    g

    salm

    onids

    anch

    ovies

    stick

    lebac

    ks

    shark

    soth

    ersq

    uid

    sand

    lanc

    e

    atheri

    nids

    smelt

    gadid

    s

    rockfi

    shjac

    ks

    coastalinshore

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    herrin

    g

    salm

    onids

    anch

    ovies

    stick

    lebac

    ks

    shark

    soth

    ersq

    uid

    sand

    lanc

    e

    atheri

    nids

    smelt

    gadid

    s

    rockfi

    shjac

    ks

    coastal

    inshore

    California Current: dominated by herring

    Alaska Current: dominated by salmon

    Orsi et al. 2007 AFS symposium 57

    % of fishes caught, by family, in two current systems

    Coastal and inshore communities > 70%

  • Thysanoessa longipes

    15 – 23 mm

    Themisto pacifica

    2 – 8 mm

    Common crustaceans eaten by salmon

    Euphausiids (krill) Hyperiid Amphipods

  • Some fishes eaten by salmon at sea

    Leuroglossus schmidti ~135 mm SL

    Stenobrachius leucopsarus ~90 mm SL

    Pleurogrammus monopterygius ~40 mm SL Atka mackerel

    Hemilepidotus spp. ~15 mm SL

    Northern lampfish (lanternfish) Northern smoothtongue - Bathylagidae

  • Fishes eaten by salmon (Puget Sound)

    Pacific herring

    Northern anchovy

    Sand lance

    Surf smelt

  • Limacina helicina

    2 – 3 mm

    Berryteuthis anonychus

    Gonatopsis borealis

    Pteropods Squid

    Mollusks eaten by salmon

  • Gelatinous zooplankton: ctenophores, medusae, salps (tunicates)

    Beroe spp. ~45 mm TL

    Salpa sp. ~20 mm TL

    Aglantha digitale ~15 mm TL

  • Energy density of salmon prey organisms

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

    Stenobrachius leucopsarus (112 mm SL)

    Stenobrachius leucopsarus (64 mm SL)

    Berryteuthis anonychus (82 mm ML)

    Berryteuthis anonychus (86 mm ML)

    Hemilepidotus sp. (21 mm SL)

    Thysanoessa longipes (23 mm TL)

    Tarletonbeania crenularis (43 mm SL)

    Thysanoessa longipes (19 mm TL)

    Parathemisto pacifica (Females w/ young)

    Limacina helicina (3 mm TL)

    Hippoglossus stenolepis (19 mm SL)

    Squid (22 mm ML)

    Sebastes sp. (11 mm SL)

    Clione limacina (16 mm TL)

    Salpa sp. (35 mm TL)

    500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0

    Salpa, Beroe

    pteropods, Themisto; juv. fish, euphausiids juv. squid

  • Annual cycle of average zooplankton density at Ocean Station P

    050

    100150200250300

    Jan

    Feb

    Mar

    April

    May

    June Ju

    lyAu

    gSe

    pt Oct

    Nov

    DecZo

    opla

    nkto

    n (g

    /100

    0 m

    3)

    Brodeur et al. (1996)

    (mean and standard error)

  • Synchronous downstream migration of pink salmon fry and density of zooplankton in Prince

    William Sound, Alaska (Cooney et al. 1995).

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    21-Mar 20-Apr 20-May 19-Jun

    Zoop

    lank

    ton

    (ml/m

    3)

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    Pink

    sal

    mon

    (tho

    usan

    ds)zooplankton

    pink salmon

  • Wakatake maru

    Food habits of salmon vary among species, years, and among fish of different sizes

    Nancy Davis

  • 0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03

    UnidOtherGelatinousFish PteropodSquidCrab larvAmphipodCopepodEuphausiid

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03

    UnidOtherGelatinousFish PteropodSquidCrab larvAmphipodCopepodEuphausiid

    Salmon prey composition Bering Sea Basin, summer 1991-2003

    Coho

    Chinook

    no data no data

  • 0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03

    UnidOtherGelatinousFish PteropodSquidCrab larvAmphipodCopepodEuphausiid

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03

    UnidOtherGelatinousFish PteropodSquidCrab larvAmphipodCopepodEuphausiid

    0%

    20%

    40%

    60%

    80%

    100%

    91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03

    UnidOtherGelatinousFish PteropodSquidCrab larvAmphipodCopepodEuphausiid

    Sockeye

    Pink

    Chum

    Prey of salmon collected from the Bering Sea basin 1991 to 2003

  • sockeye chum pink chinooksockeye 52 88 54chum 52 26pink 55chinook

    Diet overlap Bering Sea basin, summer 1991 - 2003

    LowModerateHighVery high 75 - 100%

    0 - 24% 25 - 49%

    50 - 74%

  • 0

    25

    50

    75

    100

    0 100 200 300 400

    cohoChinook

    Body length (mm)

    % fi

    sh in

    the

    diet

    Ontogenic diet shift: coho and Chinook salmon consume

    a higher proportion of fish as they grow

    Daly et al. 2009

  • Diet vs. body size

    Body Weight (g)

    0%20%40%60%80%

    100%

  • Time of day

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    0600-0800

    0900-1100

    1200-1400

    1500-1700

    1800-2000

    2100-2300

    0000-0200

    0300-0500

    Euphausiids and copepods

    Sockeye: diel change in prey composition

    Prey

    wt (

    g)

    Euphausids and copepods

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    0600-0800

    0900-1100

    1200-1400

    1500-1700

    1800-2000

    2100-2300

    0000-0200

    0300-0500

    Time of day

    Fish Fish

  • Data storage tags record temperature and pressure (depth)

  • Attachment of the DST to salmon

  • Chum salmon

    TD Tag 1565 - Hokkaido Chum Salmon

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    9 16 21 25 28 1 4 8 11 15 18 22 25 29 1 5 8 12 15 19 22August

    Tem

    pera

    ture

    ( C)

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    Dept

    h (m

    )

    July September

    Tagged: 7/9/02Location: 56-30N, 179-00ELength: 618 mm, Age: 0.3

    Recovered: 9/24/02Nemuro coast, Hokkaido, JapanLength: 655 mm, Weight: 3.4 kg

    = night

    recuperation period coastal period

    diel vertical migration

    Depth

    Temperature

  • Growth of salmon at sea

    Pink Chum Chinook Sockeye Coho Steelhead Masu

    Smolt weight (g)

    0.22 0.4 5 to 18 10 18 50 18

    Adult weight

    (kg)

    1.63 3.73 7.22 2.69 3.02 3.48 1.45

    Full years at sea

    1 2,3,4 2,3,4 2,3 1 2 1

    Data from McGurk 1996, Groot and Margolis 1991, Bigler et al. 1996, Burgner et al. 1992, Kato 1991.

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    370 390 410 430 450 470 490 510 530Length (mm, MEH)

    femalesmales

    In many cases, male salmon grow faster than females (i.e., are longer at a given age)

    4-yr old sockeye salmon from Woody Island, Iliamna Lake

    Perc

    ent o

    f fus

    h m

    easu

    red

  • Males may also be heavier for a given length

    Woody Island sockeye salmon

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    350 400 450 500 550 600

    Males

    Females Mas

    s (k

    g)

    Length (MEH, in mm)

  • Factors affecting the growth of salmon at sea

    • Density (intra-specific competition) • Ocean conditions

    – Productivity – Temperature

    • Inter-specific competition

  • 600

    640

    680

    720

    760

    0 15 30 45 60Chum salmon abundance (millions)

    Fork

    leng

    th (m

    m) males age 4

    females age 4

    Mean fork length of Hokkaido chum salmon as a function of the number of adult chum salmon (catch plus escapement)

    that year (from Kaeriyama 1998).

  • Mean length (males and females combined, for fish spending two years at sea) of adult Bristol Bay sockeye salmon as a

    function of the number of adults returning to spawn that year.

    480

    490

    500

    510

    520

    530

    540

    0 20 40 60 80Millions of adult salmon

    Mea

    n le

    ngth

    (mm

    ) 1958-761977-971998-02

  • Hypothesized effects of ocean temperature and density on sockeye salmon growth rate

    Abundance

    Body Size at Age

    Temperature 1

    Temperature 2

    (Peterman 1984)

  • photo by Richard Bell

  • Growth History

    Scale Radius

    Fish

    Len

    gth Individual circuli

  • Back-calculated lengths of chinook salmon (in mm) at different ages, as a function of their final age at maturity

    (data from Parker and Larkin 1959).

    AGE Age at maturity

    Sample 2 3 4 5 6

    2 4 266 3 27 220 508 4 150 183 466 676 5 60 171 425 622 813 6 8 122 368 549 730 917

  • …the end

  • 0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00

    SockeyeChumPinkChinookTotal

    Central Bering Sea Mean CPUE per tan 1991-2000

  • Age notation: 1 . 2

    No. freshwater winters No. ocean winters

    Species Common ages & maturity in catch

    Sockeye 1.1, 2.1, 1.2, 2.2 immature, maturing

    Chum 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 immature, maturing

    Pink All maturing 0.1

    Coho All maturing 1.1, 2.1

    Chinook 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 immature

  • Stomach contents for salmon sampled in the Strait of Juan de Fuca

    0 4

    0

    80

    < 40 cm 40-60 cm Total

    Coho

    0 4

    0

    80

    Chinook % s

    tom

    ach

    volu

    me

    < 40 cm 40-60 cm

    > 60 cm

    > 60 cm

    Fish Crustaceans Miscellaneous

    Total

  • Stomach contents of salmon in the Strait of Juan de Fuca

    0 4

    0

    80

    < 55 cm >55 cm Total

    Sockeye

    0 4

    0

    80

    Pink % s

    tom

    ach

    volu

    me

    < 55 cm < 55 cm

    Fish Crustaceans Miscellaneous

  • Biomass of Salmonids

    0200400600

    Coastal shelf Coastaldownwelling

    Coastalupwelling

    Domain

    Biom

    ass

    (T x

    100

    0)

  • LowModerateHighVery high 75 - 100%

    0 - 24% 25 - 49% 50 - 74%

    sockeye chum chinooksockeye 49 21chum 28

    chinook

    sockeye chumsockeye 80chum

    Summer, basin, even yrs 1992-2002

    chum chinookchum 30

    chinook

    Fall, basin, 2002

    Fall, Aleutian Is., 2002

    Fall, EBS shelf, 2002

    Sockeye N=78 Chum N=360 Chinook N=84

    Sockeye N=32 Chum N=58

    Chum N=54 Chinook N=16

    Comparison of Diet Overlap-Summer and Fall

    sockeye chum pink chinooksockeye 56 76 57chum 58 26pink 45chinook

  • sockeye chum pink chinooksockeye 52 88 54chum 52 26pink 55chinook

    sockeye chum pink chinooksockeye 56 76 57chum 58 26pink 45chinook

    Sockeye Chum Pink ChinookSockeye 44 83 54Chum 40 28Pink 63Chinook

    All years, 1991-2003

    Even years, 1992-2002

    Odd years, 1991-2003

    Diet overlap Bering Sea basin, summer

    Sockeye N=724 Chum N=1523 Pink N=1331 Chinook N=193

    Sockeye N=577 Chum N=1413 Pink N=156 Chinook N=274

    LowModerateHighVery high 75 - 100%

    0 - 24% 25 - 49% 50 - 74%

    (low pink)

    (high pink)

  • Relationship between the size of salmonids and the size of their prey

    Keeley and Grant 2001. CJFAS

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    1 10 100 1000Fish length (cm)

    Pre

    y le

    ngth

    (mm

    )

    Fishes (all environments combined)

    Ocean invertebrates

    Freshwater invertebrates (streams and lakes combined)

    Keeley and Grant (2001)

    Salmonid Feeding and Growth at SeaFeeding and growth of salmon at seaSlide Number 3Slide Number 4North Pacific Ocean current systems (Dodimead et al. 1963)Slide Number 6Slide Number 7Catches of fishes and squid in gill nets along 155o W by the Oshoro Maru, July 1984Slide Number 9Slide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15Annual cycle of average zooplankton density at Ocean Station PSynchronous downstream migration of pink salmon fry and density of zooplankton in Prince William Sound, Alaska (Cooney et al. 1995).Slide Number 18Slide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Slide Number 22Slide Number 23Slide Number 24Slide Number 25Slide Number 26Slide Number 27Growth of salmon at sea Slide Number 29Slide Number 30Factors affecting the growth of salmon at seaMean fork length of Hokkaido chum salmon as a function of the number of adult chum salmon (catch plus escapement) that year (from Kaeriyama 1998).Mean length (males and females combined, for fish spending two years at sea) of adult Bristol Bay sockeye salmon as a function of the number of adults returning to spawn that year. Hypothesized effects of ocean temperature and density on sockeye salmon growth rateSlide Number 35Slide Number 36Back-calculated lengths of chinook salmon (in mm) at different ages, as a function of their final age at maturity (data from Parker and Larkin 1959).Slide Number 38Slide Number 39Slide Number 40Stomach contents for salmon sampled in the Strait of Juan de FucaStomach contents of salmon in the Strait of Juan de FucaSlide Number 43Slide Number 44Slide Number 45Slide Number 46Relationship between the size of salmonids and the size of their prey