Paris MOU on Port State Control

Safety and Marine Environment

Protection: Prospects We Face

Carien DroppersDeputy General Secretary

Paris MOU on Port State Control

Overview:

Results of the Paris MoU activities and future prospects:

Statistics (incl. BWG & RO performance) Introduction of New Inspection Regime

(NIR) in 2011

Paris MoU results 2008• Total inspections 24615• No. deficiencies 83804• No. individual ships insp. 15237• Number of ships detained 1214• Detained 4,93%

of which 14.2% RO related detentions• No. ships refused access 19

Black list 2008 (2006-2008)

(Top of) White list 2008 (2006-2008)

RO Performance list 2008 (2006-2008)

(Top of) RO Performance list 2008 (2006-2008)

Number of inspections

Number of deficiencies observed

Number of detentions

Detention % of inspection

Detention % per ship type

Paris MOU on Port State Control

Concentrated Inspection Campaigns

• 2009: CIC on lifeboat launching appliances (Sep – Nov) Checklist on web site

• 2010: CIC on tanker damage stability(oil and chemical tankers, gas carriers)

• 2011: CIC on structural safety and Load Line Convention

MORE FACTS AND FIGURES,

ANNUAL REPORTS

Paris MoU NIR– PSC Directive 2009/16/EC

NIRNew Inspection Regime

Directive on PSC

TEG, MAB, PSCC

EP, Council, COMDirective on Ropax

Paris MoU Task Force 31 EMSA Leader

2009/16/EC

START COLLECTING

Startup of Paris MoU NIR– PSC Directive 2009/16/EC

OJ Publication28/05/2009

2009 2010 2011 2012

Application01/01/2011

START APPLYING (Considering < 3 yrs)

Detentions on all Ship Types Detentions on Grey List Flags

Company performance RO performance

Banning

Ships Risk Profile (PI and PII)

Regional Commitment MS Fair Share

95/21/EC

3 yrs after enter in force17/06/2012

Full

implementation

with no

restrictions

Enter in force+20 days

NIR

EC Dir 2009/16

MoU 32nd Amendment

NIR consequences Improved targeting

Risk based targeting

Less flexibility for MS in selecting ships for inspectionSRP, PI and PII, Overriding Factors, Unexpected Factors

Regional commitments vs national commitmentsFair Share, Postponement

Further refusal of access provisionsBanning, All ship types

Benchmarking of Flags, RO’s and CompaniesInspection Intervals, Company and ROs Performance

Widened scope from ports to ports and anchoragesFull coverage of ships visiting Paris MoU region

NIR: Ship Risk Profile

HRS – High Risk ShipSRS – Standard Risk ShipLRS – Low Risk Ships

• Generic Factors– Type of Ship– Flag– RO– Company

• Historical Factors– Deficiencies– Detentions

(SRP is recalculated on a daily basis)

High Risk Ship (HRS) Low Risk Ship (LRS)

Criteria Weighting points Criteria

Type Oil, Chemical, Gas Bulk, Passenger 2 All types

Age > 12 yrs 1 All ages

FlagBGW-list

Black - VHR, HR, M to HR 2White

Black – MR 1

IMO-Audit - - Yes

RecognizedOrganisation

Performance

H - - High

M - - -

L Low1

-

VL Very Low -

EU recognised - - Yes

Company Performance

H - - High

M - - -

L Low2

-

VL Very Low -

Nr of def. recorded in each insp. within pr. 36 months

Deficiencies Not eligible -

≤ 5 (and at least 1 insp. carried out in

pr. 36 months)

Nr of detentions within pr. 36 months Detentions ≥ 2 detentions 1 No

Detention HRS = 5 points * LRS = all criteria * SRS = not HRS or LRS

Paris MOU on Port State Control

Company performanceCompany Performance Formula: • Taking into account detention and deficiency

history of all ships in the (ISM) company’s fleet• Calculated daily over a 36 month period• ISM deficiencies 5 points. Others 1 point• Refusal of access (banning): above average

detention index• Performance: high, medium, low, very low

Only possible if

no banning of any

of the ships in

last 36 months

NIR: SRP Inspections IntervalsHRS

SRS

LRS

Inspection Window

5th to 6th

month

24th to 36th

month

10th to 12th

month

NIR: Inspection Priority

Priority II

Ship may be inspected

Inspection Window

Priority I

Ship must be inspected

Timeline for any Ship Risk Profile

Overriding Factors

Unexpected Factors

Priority I

Priority IIBut…

If not inspected within Window, ship becomes

... MS still may

inspect outside the

regime!

NIR: Refusal of Access (Banning)

36 months 24 months 12 months Today

Detained 3 or more times

Detained 3 or more times

OR… • Jump detentions• Fail to call to agreed repair yard

Multiple Banning (Example for Black Flag, for Grey Flag is 2 yrs)

3yrs

3yrs

D D

Ban Ban Ban

Ban can be lifted after 3 months

Ship Banned 2nd time after 3 detentions

in 3 yearsBan can be lifted after 12 months

Ship Banned 3rd time if detained

Ban can be lifted after 24 months if:

• White Flag • EU RO• HP CompanyOr Permanent Ban

D D D

Ship Banned 1st time after 3 detentions

in 3 years

D

Permanent BanPermanent Banned

if detained

Reporting Obligations 72H Before ETA if eligible for Expanded Inspection

24H Before ETA for every ship

ATA and ATD within a reasonable time

Contact• Secretariat of the Paris

MoU on Port State Control P.O.Box 90653

2509 LR The Hague The Netherlands

• www.parismou.org

• secretariat@parismou.org