Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

22
Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC

Transcript of Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Page 1: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Safeguarding deaf children

David Miller

Development Manager

NSPCC

Page 2: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Risk of abuse

Disabled children 3.4 times more likely to be

abused• 3.8 neglect• 3.8 physical abuse• 3.1 sexual abuse• 3.9 emotional abuse

Sullivan and Knutson (2000)

Page 3: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Risk of abuse

• 45.8% of deaf girls and 42.4% deaf boys exposed to unwanted sexual experiences

• More than twice as often for girls and three times for boys compared to hearing children

• Nearly half reported the abuser was deaf• Half of abuse took place in special schools• 49% didn’t tell. 11% were not believed Kvam (2004)

Page 4: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Risk of abuse

• Research indicates that disabled children are significantly more likely to experience abuse than their non-disabled peers

• Evidence suggests increased vulnerability for children with communication impairments, behavioural disorders, learning disabilities and sensory impairments (compared to disabled children as a whole)

Stalker and McArthur (2012)

Page 5: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Bullying

• Every child knew about bullying

• Evoked high levels of feelings

• Most had been bullied

• More than half had bullied others

• Many ideas and suggestions

• Adults should take it seriously

Triangle consultation for NSPCC 2007

Page 6: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Reasons for increased risk: Attitudes and assumptions

• Devaluing of deaf children, their experiences and their needs

• Lack of awareness about cultural issues or deaf development issues

• Reluctance to believe that deaf children are abused• Lack of recognition of the possible impact of abuse• Low commitment to overcoming communication barriers• Attributing indicators of possible abuse to child’s

deafness eg child’s mood, behaviour• Reluctance to challenge parents/carers

Page 7: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Gaps in effective provision of support services

• Inaccessible community and support services• Lack of consultation and empowerment of deaf child• Lack of: personal safety skills education; accessible

information and access to confidential advice• Skills gap between workers with deaf children and

children protection • Lack of child focus in assessments• Lack of co-ordinated multi-agency working• Resource constraints

Page 8: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

The deaf child and social interactions

• Social exclusion and isolation• Poor self esteem, self-image and self-confidence• Lack of vocabulary and awareness to understand about

abuse and be able to seek help• Limited trusted sources of support with relevant

communication skills to turn to for help• Deaf child specifically targeted• Inappropriate attitudes and behaviours resulting from

abuse, especially where child’s therapeutic needs unmet

Page 9: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Barriers to recognition of abuse

Second Joint Chief Inspectors’ Report into Safeguarding (2005):•Significant issues in identifying and acting on welfare concerns•Child protection policies inconsistently adapted to take account of the needs of children and young people with communication, sensory or learning difficulties•The views of many disabled children are not heard•Staff in a range of settings are not consistently trained in child protection and safeguarding to meet the needs of disabled children.

Page 10: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Barriers to recognition of abuseProtecting disabled children: Thematic inspection (Ofsted 2012) some key issues:•Early concerns and emerging risks mostly tackled well•Children in need work not always well co-ordinated.•Many plans lacked detail and focus on outcomes. •Reviews did not always include all professionals working with the child•Lack of rigour increased the likelihood of child protection concerns not being identified early enough•Delays in identifying thresholds for child protection when concerns less clear cut, especially neglect•Assessments not consistently identify and analyse key risk factors leading to delays in support and intervention

Page 11: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Children’s Services, deaf children and child protection

• Only 37% responding Local Authorities described co-working arrangements between child protection teams and specialist social workers

• 18% no co-working arrangement at all

• Others described various arrangements for getting help of different varieties within or outside the Local Authority

Young, Hunt, Oram and Smith (2009)

Page 12: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Safeguarding deaf childrenKey issues

• Valuing deaf children and their experiences

• Accessible community and support services

• Policies and practices that safeguard deaf children and promote their wellbeing

• Empowering deaf children

Page 13: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Safeguarding deaf children• Developing own awareness of safeguarding and deaf

children• Consulting with and empowering deaf children• Advocating for the deaf child’s wellbeing• Developing sex and relationship and safety skills

education and vocabulary• Ensuring opportunities for deaf children to seek help• ‘Listening’ to the child and responding to concerns• Appropriate identification of thresholds• Effective multi-agency working

Page 14: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Safe: Personal Safety Skills Programme

Pilot: 3 schools with deaf children:

• Sign bilingual• Total communication• Oral

Page 15: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Aims of programme

Provide children with knowledge, awareness,

information and language to:• Keep safe• Make more informed choices• Strengthen identity, self confidence and self-

esteem• Explore and understand experiences

Page 16: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Topic areas

• Feelings• Relationships• Differences• Bullying• Growing up, including sex education• Personal safety in the home• Personal safety outside the home• Road safety• Safety using the internet / mobile phones• Someone to turn to

Page 17: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Working with Deaf and Disabled Children

• Information: Easy read, audio, BSL• Visual materials• Examples – scenarios, varying context• Role plays• Puppets• Exercises• Reinforcing messages – school, home etc.• Rolling programmes

Page 18: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Examples of storyboards

Feelings

Page 19: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Differences

Page 20: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Bullying

Page 21: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.

Some observations from delivery of the programme

• Many children lacked the appropriate language, vocabulary and awareness to be able to communicate abuse – including post 16 plus

• Some had very limited (or no) knowledge of sex education

• Professionals often lacked confidence and/or knowledge to deliver the programme

• Several disclosures were made during the piloting • Referrals were made to Social Care and Health• Professionals learnt new information about the children

and young people

Page 22: Safeguarding deaf children David Miller Development Manager NSPCC.