SAC Meeting Survey - Summary
4
• Responses (61) 27 SAC members 24 Non-SAC members • Why have you not attended? Too busy 41% Time/day of meetings 38% Unaware of meetings 28% • Better days/times? Wednesday AM Thursday AM • What kind of schedule? Set day/time each month 77% SAC Meeting Survey - Summary Speaker suggestions Coach Dave Clawson Dr. Anthony Atala SRI update HR/Benefits Different department updates Climate survey update Facilities Management
description
SAC Meeting Survey - Summary. Responses (61) 27 SAC members 24 Non-SAC members Why have you not attended? Too busy 41% Time/day of meetings 38% Unaware of meetings 28% Better days/times? Wednesday AM Thursday AM What kind of schedule? Set day/time each month 77%. Speaker suggestions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of SAC Meeting Survey - Summary
• Responses (61)27 SAC members
24 Non-SAC members
• Why have you not attended?Too busy 41%
Time/day of meetings 38%
Unaware of meetings 28%
• Better days/times?Wednesday AM
Thursday AM
• What kind of schedule?Set day/time each month 77%
SAC Meeting Survey - Summary
Speaker suggestions
Coach Dave ClawsonDr. Anthony AtalaSRI updateHR/BenefitsDifferent department updatesClimate survey updateFacilities Management
ICC – Integration Collaboration Committee
Timeline
January 2013 Presentation to WFU/WFBMC Sr Mgmt
Spring 2013 Established joint SAC/Faculty Senate Committee
Dan Bourland Mary CranfillTamara Spence Angela CullerMichele Gillespie Bill KaneBruce King Jennifer KillingsworthDuncan Hite
April-June 2013 Met with committee to draft charter, establish reporting structure, establish direction and next steps
August 2013 Presentation to WFU/WFBMC Sr Mgmt to gain approval of charter and direction
ICC – Integration Collaboration Committee
From Draft CharterOutcomes:
Prioritize at least 6-8 ideas for research
Identify:Areas & people affected by the current processes
Current initiatives on either campus related to the proposed processes
Areas responsible for the processes, who would benefit from a process change and any negative impacts or increase in workload
Global benefits/negatives for the University.
Research peer institutions for best practices
Estimate resources and time needed to implement or if further research needed
Recommend next steps
Prepare formal recommendations pertaining to collaborative process optimization to present to the Faculty Senate, SAC and senior administration
ICC – Integration Collaboration Committee
Committee Identified Areas for Research• On-boarding students across campuses• Transportation (shuttle/zipcar)• Technology in general: ex. email (Google vs. Outlook),
Google tools, Webex, Campus directories, Blackbaud• Pcard• Educational Software (ex. Blackboard)
Next steps?
