RxQual and Its Limitations

2
RxQual and Its Limitations RxQual is obtained by transforming the bit error rate (BER) into a scale from 0 to 7 (see 3GPP TS 45.008, section 8.2). In other words, RxQual is a very basic measure: it simply reflects the average BER over a certain period of time (0.5 s). By contrast, a listener’s assessment of speech quality is a complex process which is influenced by many factors. Some of these, all of which RxQual fails to take into account, are the following: The distribution of bit errors over time. For a given BER, if the BER fluctuates very much, the perceived quality is lower than if the BER remains rather constant most of the time. Different channel conditions give rise to radically different BER distributions. However, since RxQual just measures the average BER, it cannot capture this. (In fact, the logarithmic scale of RxQual gives rise to the opposite effect: a high BER variance gives a better RxQual than a low variance does. This is completely misleading from a •speech quality point of view.) Frame erasures. When entire speech frames are lost, this affects the perceived quality in •a very negative way. Handovers. Handovers always cause some frames to be lost, which generally gives rise to audible disturbances. This does not show at all in RxQual, however, since during •handovers BER measurements are suppressed. The choice of speech codec. The general quality level and the highest attainable quality vary widely between speech codecs. Moreover, each codec has its own strengths and •weaknesses as regards types of input and channel conditions. In short, RxQual fails to capture many phenomena that have a decisive influence on a listener’s judgment of speech quality. Using RxQual for optimization of speech quality in the network thus leads to suboptimal results. Design of SQI SQI has been designed to take into consideration all the phenomena discussed in the preceding section. This ensures that it will produce an unbiased prediction of the speech quality, independently of channel conditions and other circumstances. Somewhat roughly, the computation of SQI involves •the bit error rate (BER) •the frame erasure rate (FER) •data on handover events •statistics on the distributions of each of these parameters. Furthermore, for each speech codec, SQI is computed by a separate algorithm which is tuned to the characteristics of that codec. Like RxQual. Popup .5 s intervals. SQI is updated at 0.

description

RxQual and Its Limitations

Transcript of RxQual and Its Limitations

Page 1: RxQual and Its Limitations

RxQual and Its Limitations

RxQual is obtained by transforming the bit error rate (BER) into a scale from 0 to 7 (see 3GPP TS 45.008, section 8.2). In other words, RxQual is a very basic measure: it simply reflects the average BER over a certain period of time (0.5 s). By contrast, a listener’s assessment of speech quality is a complex process which is influenced by many factors. Some of these, all of which RxQual fails to take into account, are the following: The distribution of bit errors over time. For a given BER, if the BER fluctuates very much, the perceived quality is lower than if the BER remains rather constant most of the time. Different channel conditions give rise to radically different BER distributions. However, since RxQual just measures the average BER, it cannot capture this. (In fact, the logarithmic scale of RxQual gives rise to the opposite effect: a high BER variance gives a better RxQual than a low variance does. This is completely misleading from a •speech quality point of view.) Frame erasures. When entire speech frames are lost, this affects the perceived quality in •a very negative way. Handovers. Handovers always cause some frames to be lost, which generally gives rise to audible disturbances. This does not show at all in RxQual, however, since during •handovers BER measurements are suppressed. The choice of speech codec. The general quality level and the highest attainable quality vary widely between speech codecs. Moreover, each codec has its own strengths and •weaknesses as regards types of input and channel conditions. In short, RxQual fails to capture many phenomena that have a decisive influence on a listener’s judgment of speech quality. Using RxQual for optimization of speech quality in the network thus leads to suboptimal results.

Design of SQI SQI has been designed to take into consideration all the phenomena discussed in the preceding section. This ensures that it will produce an unbiased prediction of the speech quality, independently of channel conditions and other circumstances. Somewhat roughly, the computation of SQI involves •the bit error rate (BER) •the frame erasure rate (FER) •data on handover events •statistics on the distributions of each of these parameters. Furthermore, for each speech codec, SQI is computed by a separate algorithm which is tuned to the characteristics of that codec.

Like RxQual. Popup .5 s intervals. SQI is updated at 0.