RV 2015: Financing Equitable TOD Shouldn't Make You Nervous by Amy Rowland
-
Upload
railvolution -
Category
Economy & Finance
-
view
2.141 -
download
0
Transcript of RV 2015: Financing Equitable TOD Shouldn't Make You Nervous by Amy Rowland
Amy Rowland Field Director – Salt Lake City, UT
Improving Communi-es Enhancing Lives NDC is the na-on’s oldest non-‐profit provider of community and economic development, technical assistance and training.
Training
Financial Products
Development Services
Technical Assistance
NDC’s Services
3 National Development Council
The image cannot be displayed. Your computer may not have enough memory to open the image, or the image may have been corrupted. Restart your computer, and then open the file again. If the red x still appears, you may have to delete the image and then insert it again.
• In Utah Only – GSLDC Loan Fund
Financial Products
5 National Development Council
• NDC Corporate Equity Fund, L.P. (CEF) – Low Income Housing Tax Credit Equity
• Grow America Fund (GAF) – Small Business Loans
• HEDC New Markets, Inc. (HEDC-‐NM) – New Market Tax Credit Investment
GSLDC Loan Fund Ini-al Capitaliza-on of $10MM
4 Ini-al Lending Par-cipants – Morgan Stanley, GE Capital, Synchrony and Zions Bank
Primary Loan Types ü SBA Guaranteed for Small Businesses-‐ can be up to 25 years ü Non SBA-‐eligible real estate loans – 3 to 5 year term ü Land Acquisi-on or bridge loans for mixed use projects
Loan Loss Reserves (6%)
National Development Council
6
What Keeps Lenders Up at Night?
RISK! Parking ra-os not typical Unproven demand Homeownership Market rate housing
Higher Density Add’l Design or Use Criteria Environmental Issues
Limited Comparables
Wide Market Differences NYC or Chicago Community Norms for TOD
• Paying to park is standard • Higher rents for easy access to transit
• Mix of uses near residen-al • Transit stops in areas where dense development is already typical
Salt Lake (or Denver or Dallas) • Car-‐centric • Varying degrees of
density phobia • Lack of experience/
comfort with mix of uses
• Akemp-ng to shape future growth through rail-‐based transit
ETOD Assump-ons Mature Market Young Market
Land costs near stops are higher Yes Maybe
Demand near stops is higher Yes Maybe
Reduced need for parking Yes Maybe
Affordable housing more difficult to finance Maybe No
Loan Pool Advantages Shared risk among mul-ple lenders Provides underwri-ng exper-se in specific financing tools LIHTC NMTC Public Sources Loan Loss Reserves or Top Loss Lender provides addi-onal security Primarily nonprofit, founda-on and public sector sources
Utah ETOD Fund
• $30MM Pool with same lenders as GSLDC • Managed by exis-ng nonprofit – Utah Center for Neighborhood Stabiliza-on
• Predevelopment, acquisi-on and construc-on loans for affordable housing located within ½ mile of rail transit or frequent bus service
Remaining Gap for ETOD Financing Fixed Rate, Permanent Financing (25+ year term and amor-za-on)
Some Availability for Affordable Housing HUD 221 (d)4, Fannie/Freddie, T.E. Bonds Some Conven-onal Lenders (especially with LIHTC Equity) Small project/loans are more difficult Mixed Use Especially Tricky