RURAL WINGS
-
Upload
philip-hebert -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
2
description
Transcript of RURAL WINGS
1 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, January 7-8, 2008
RURAL WINGS
Athens Plenary meeting
Avanti Contribution
2 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
Agenda
Avanti contribution will be in the following areas:
Day one:Report from the on-going test runs
UK Site report UK Satcomms report
Day two:Discussions
Assessment of the test runs Bandwidth issues Deliverables status
WP8 - D8.1 Market Analysis and Business Case
3 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Site Report - 1
Summary of Active Terminals
Site Active Since
Alt. Climate Popn.
Bewholme, East Yorkshire, England
Jun 07 10 Coastal, Temperate
50
Cilcennin, Ceredigion, Wales
Jun 07 30 Coastal, Temperate
30
Cambourne, Cambridgeshire, England
Sep 07 10 Inland, Temperate
250
Biggar, South Lanarkshire, Scotland
Sep 07 50 Inland, Temperate
15
4 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Site Report - 2
User Profiles
Translation issues - noneLocalisation issues
Cilcennin* - mesh wifi network Cambourne - wifi in schools.
Site Type Wifi? End points
Bandwidth
Bewholme farm/community yes 6 1M/256
Cilcennin sme/community No* 5 1M/256
Biggar farm yes 3 1M/256
Cambourne community yes 4 1M/256
5 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Site Report - 3
Installation Photos
Bewholme
Cilcennin
6 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Site Report - 4
Training activities
Site Sessions Attendance
Description
Bewholme InitialFollow up
116
Support to local expertMany levels of expertiseNon-RW-specific support materials usedGeneral welcome for system
Cilcennin InitialFollow up
89
Concern about sustainabilitySpecific mesh network questionsPossible extension to outlying areaGeneral welcome for system
Cambourne Initial demo only 3 Initial enthusiasm stalled
Biggar Initial demo only 1
7 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Site Report - 5
Statistics
We continuously collect statistics for all terminals. Many statistics are available. But beware data protection!
The following examples are from Cilcennin.
8 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Site Report - 6
Also available in spreadsheet form for further processing / integration.
9 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
UK Satcomms Report
Overview
A key event was change of hub/terminal vendor It was decided to migrate RW terminals to new system Terminal migration took place in October/November There were some initial performance problems, which have
now been solved.
Issues
Change of hub/terminal vendor Concerns about the health aspects of wifi, especially in
schools
10 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
Assessment of the Test Runs - 1
Overview
Despite post-migration problems there was a general welcome for the system
Sites are very different, some are enthusiastic & active whilst some are silent and not active
Sites are generally using general Internet tools like Search Engines rather than the RW-specific applications
Challenges
Increased use of RW applications by existing sites Addition of more applications suitable to existing sites Location of more suitable sites for next phase
Bandwidth Issues
N/A
11 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
Deliverable Status - 1
D8.1 (Market defn & Business Case) Overview
Effort - 27 man monthsPartners involved – 11 main + others in WPDDocument Issues - 3 in this 18 month period M21 initial – outline market plan and 1st version of business
case M25 update – market research and analysis M30 update – market monitoring
12 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
Deliverable Status - 2
Status
Since august several draft documents issued with requests for contribution (as requested or requested areas of the document)
Initial issue already 2 months late, and we now plan (have) to deliver the initial issue by the end of Jan
Concerns The document is immature Broadband is reasonably well covered but would benefit
from more information about national broadband initiatives The biggest hole is the lack of information about national
edcuational systems & markets.
13 RURAL WINGS IPAthens, April 7, 2006
Deliverable Status - 3
The feasibility document already covers some of the material
It will be difficult to justify much effort in the work package Reviewers might be critical and we need an approach From the comments received so far it is not clear if
partners Want to be involved Have the necessary resources