RTM Manual Draft
Transcript of RTM Manual Draft
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
1/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 1 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part 1: Introduction to RTM -------------------------------------------------------------------------4
Chapter 1: RTM Definition, Scope, and Deliverables------------------------------------- 5Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
1.1.1 RTM Definition ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51.1.2 RTM Scope ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 61.1.3 RTM Deliverables---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
Part 2: RTM Models, Diagnostics and roadmap ----------------------------------------------8
Chapter 2.1: RTM Models--------------------------------------------------------------------------9Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 92.1.1 Types of Distribution Models ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
How Each Model Works: Diagrammatic Representation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 10
2.1.2 Direct Distribution Models: On Basis of Order Taking ----------------------------------------------------- 10DSD Ready Stock Model ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10DSD - Pre-sell Model --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11DSD - Tel-sell Model---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
Responsibility Matrix ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 122.1.3 Direct Distribution Models: On Basis of Management Control------------------------------------------ 13Company Managed ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13Clearing & Forwarding Agent (C&FA) Managed----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13
2.1.4 Direct Distribution Models: On Basis of Delivery Mechanism------------------------------------------- 13Feeder Truck Model----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13Bulk Break Model (Direct) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14
2.1.5 Advantages and Limitations of Direct Distribution Models----------------------------------------------- 142.1.6 Indirect Distribution Models: On Basis of Size and Type ------------------------------------------------- 15
Anchor Distributor Model ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15Distributor Model--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16
Area Marketing Contractor (AMC) Model-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17
2.1.7 Indirect Distribution: Delivery Mechanism --------------------------------------------------------------------- 19Full Load from Warehouse/Plant ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19
Milk Run-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19
Chapter 2.2: RTM Diagnostics: Selecting an RTM Model------------------------------ 20Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 202.2.1 Market Classification--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 202.2.2 RTM Diagnostics -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21
Distribution Effectiveness Index-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 21Distributor Strength Index --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26Distributor Strength vs. Distribution Effectiveness -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 27Distributor ROI------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 27
2.2.3 Choosing an RTM Model---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 28
Chapter 2.3: Two-year RTM Roadmap ------------------------------------------------------ 29
Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 292.3.1 RTM Planning (Town and Distributor-wise)-------------------------------------------------------------------- 292.3.2 RTM Roadmap: Integration into Annual Business Plan (ABP) ------------------------------------------ 34
Part 3: RTM Infrastructure Design and Management ------------------------------------- 36
Chapter 3.1: DSD Operation -------------------------------------------------------------------- 37Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 373.1.1 DSD Route Designing Process------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37
Get Data-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 38Locate Outlets on Map ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 39
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
2/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 2 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Create Zones ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40Calculate No. of Vehicles and Vehicle Capacity ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 40Trade Channel Characteristics Determine Distribution Requirements ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 44Create Routes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 46
3.1.2 Warehouse Management --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 50Warehouse Location ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 50Basic components of the Warehouse ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 51Designing of Warehouse----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 57Warehouse Calculations ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 59Cross Docking ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 66
Cost Estimate------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69Schedules------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 70Warehouse Layout and Drawings ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 71
3.1.3 Stock Management ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 74Assessing Product Age ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 75Identifying and Rotating Products in Warehouse ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 76Stacking and Storing Products --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 78Managing Product Quality --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82Managing Glass---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 83Handling Non-conforming Products and Materials -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84Other Good Warehousing Practices -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 85
3.1.4 Fleet Management ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 86Fleet Buying--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 86Designing Fleet Upper Structure------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 91
Fleet Maintenance------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 93Advertising Through Fleet --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 95Fleet Performance Metric---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 95
3.1.5 Invoicing and Settlement Process--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 953.1.6 Cost Per Case (CPC) Calculation and Benchmarking ------------------------------------------------------ 96
Warehouse Costs-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 96Handling Costs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 96Fleet Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 97Manpower Costs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 98Other Sales and Distribution Costs --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 98
Chapter 3.2: Clearing & Forwarding Agent (CF&A) Appointment------------------ 99Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 993.2.1 C&FA Appointment Process ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 99
3.2.2 C&F Legal Compliance-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------100
Chapter 3.3: Anchor Distributor Appointment ----------------------------------------- 103Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1033.3.1 Anchor Distributor Appointment----------------------------------------------------------------------------------103
Chapter 3.4: Distributor Appointment and Management --------------------------- 104Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1043.4.1 Distributor Appointment---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------104
When to appoint a distributor --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 104Appointment Process------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 105
3.4.2 Key Elements of Distributor Management---------------------------------------------------------------------110Managing Godown ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 110
Managing Routes and Vehicles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 112Managing Glass/Liquid ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 115Maximizing Return On Investment (ROI) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 118The Right Systems and Processes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 120Distributor Satisfaction Survey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 124
3.4.3 Distributor as Market Execution Partner -----------------------------------------------------------------------124Market Execution Partner Role------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 124
Chapter 3.5: Area Market Contractor (AMC) Appointment ------------------------- 127Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------127
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
3/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 3 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
3.5.1 AMC Appointment -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------127
Part 4: RTM Enablers------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 128
Chapter 4.1: Systems and Processes ----------------------------------------------------- 129Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1294.1.1 Depot/C&FA Replenishment System----------------------------------------------------------------------------129
Replenishment Process---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 129Performance Metrics-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130Roles and Responsibility--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130System Requirement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 130
4.1.2 Cola Replenishment System (CRS) for Distributors -------------------------------------------------------131Objective of CRS------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 131How does CRS Work ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 131CRS Roles and Responsibilities ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 132CRS Process------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 132CRS Enablers----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 134CRS Benefits------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 134Performance Metrics-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 134
4.1.3 DSD Router---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------135Territory Planner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 135Dynamic Router -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 136Different Ways for Using DSD Router ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 136Scope and Areas DSD Router can Impact ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 136
Critical Success Factors --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 137Leading Routing Solution Providers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 137Criteria for Evaluation------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 137Implementation Steps ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 138
4.1.4 Distributor Automation System (DAS) --------------------------------------------------------------------------139How does DAS work -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 139DAS Implementation Requirements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 139DAS Benefits------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 140Responsibility Matrix for DAS Implementation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 141Dos and Donts at Distributor Point------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 142DAS Performance Metrics------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 142
Chapter 4.2: RTM Organization Structure------------------------------------------------ 143Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------143
4.2.1 National RTM Organization Structure---------------------------------------------------------------------------1434.2.2 Regional RTM Organization Structure --------------------------------------------------------------------------1434.2.3 Unit RTM Organization Structure ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------1444.2.4 RTM Job Descriptions------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------144
Chapter 4.3: Proposed COA ------------------------------------------------------------------ 1454.3.1 Proposed COA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------145
Part 5: RTM Performance Metrics ------------------------------------------------------------- 146
Chapter 5.1: RTM Index ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 147Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1475.1.1 Calculating RTM Balance Score Card---------------------------------------------------------------------------147
Quality Parameters---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 147Service Parameters --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 148Cost Parameters ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 150
5.1.2 Monitoring Progress on RTM Roadmap------------------------------------------------------------------------1515.1.3 Monitoring Progress on RTM System Implementation----------------------------------------------------152
Summary--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 153
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
4/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 4 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
PART 1:INTRODUCTION TO RTM
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
5/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 5 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Chapter 1:RTM Definition, Scope, and Deliverables
Introduction
The RTM Manual is intended to standardize the entire gamut of operations under RTM function.
This chapter will cover RTM basics including:
1. What is RTM?2. What does RTM involve?3. What are the key RTM deliverables?
1.1.1 RTM Definition
RTM or Route-to-Market refers to the operations focused on ensuring that the retail outlets get the right quantity andquality of relevant SKUs from the complete range of products manufactured by the company, in a timely and cost-effective manner.
RRTTMM iiss tthhee ccrriittiiccaall lliinnkk bbeettwweeeenn ssttaannddaarrddiizzeedd mmaannuuffaaccttuurriinngg aanndd llooccaall mmaarrkkeett ddyynnaammiiccss..
SSttaannddaarrdd
IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaallTTeemmppllaattee
Manufacturing
DDeessiiggnn ffoorrSSttrraatteeggiicc FFiitt
ttooIImmpprroovvee
PPrroodduuccttiivviittyy
RTM
LLooccaallDDeessiiggnn bbaasseedd oonnDDeemmooggrraapphhiiccss &&SSoocciioo--eeccoonnoommiicc
FFaaccttoorrss
Outlets Consumers
SSuussttaaiinnaabblleeprrooffiittaabbiilliittyy ooff tthhee ssyysstteemm hhiinnggeess oonn tthhee rroobbuussttnneessss aanndd ssttrreennggtthh ooff tthhee RRTTMM..
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
6/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 6 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
If the entire product range does not reach the retail outlets/consumers in a timely and cost-effective manner, then itreflects ineffective RTM.
1.1.2 RTM Scope
Manufacturing RTM Outlet
Input = X
Incorrect RTM Design
Low Numeric Distribution
Low Market Control
Accounts Receivables/Cases On
Loan (COL)
Dissatisfied Channel Partners
Unplanned Discounting
Write-offs and BBD
IInnppuutt//OOuuttppuutt
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
7/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 7 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
1.1.3 RTM Deliverables
DSD & Anchor Distributor Territories
Order Fulfillmentfor pre sell outlets:
The orders are taken by marketdevelopers/pre sell executives. Theseorders would be fulfilled by the RTMTeam.
Availability of all the relevant SKUs onready stock route (depending upon pastsales and the expected sale of theoutlets on that route)
Deciding optimal service frequencyof the outlets of the route based ondrop size, strategic importance, andinvestment abilities
For Other Distributor Territories
SKU availability as per stock norms
Ensuring right distribution infrastructure for optimalservice frequency to the outlet
Measuring and improving Distributor satisfaction scoresby optimizing distributor infrastructure & investment
Regular distributor financial health review and correctiveaction plan
Effective Distributor Appointments
Seamless closure of non viable and inefficient distributors
Distributor Coaching to manage their infrastructure.
Depot Management
Warehouse management and MIS
Managing productivity of casuallabor, forklift, glass rotation, FirstExpired First Out (FEFO), glassbreakages, etc
Stock requirement planning andnecessary coordination
Stock management , First ExpiredFirst Out (FEFO)
DSD route design and productivity
Fleet management
Statutory compliances
Clearing and Forwarding Agent(CF&A) Management
For Logistics Centre/Warehouses at Plant:
Cola replenishment through tel-sell team
Distributor order generation (Order execution is NOT RTMresponsibility)
Freight negotiation for outbound along with UCSM andFactory Manager/ Shipping Manager
Monthly and weekly sales planning
Maintenance of minimum stocks at plant and depot to becoordinated between plant and customer service
System Operations
Distributor Automation System(DAS)
Cola Replenishment System (CRS)
Routing Software
Cola Mobile
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
8/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 8 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
PART 2:RTM MODELS, DIAGNOSTICS AND ROADMAP
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
9/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 9 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Chapter 2.1:RTM Models
Introduction
This chapter covers the basic RTM Models.
While the content of this chapter might seems very basic, it is intended to standardise the nomenclature ofvarious models running within the country. This chapter will clarify that some models, maybe currently knownby a different name, are just the variations of the basic models listed in this chapter.
2.1.1 Types of Distribution Models
The various distribution models are broadly categorised as follows based on the complexity of our distributionoperations.
Different Distribution Models
DIRECT DISTRIBUTIONFor a Metro
INDIRECT DISTRIBUTIONFor Power Town/Rural
On basis of ordertaking
On basis ofmanagement
controlOn basis of
delivery
mechanism
On basis of size andtype
On basis ofdeliverymechanism
Direct VanSales/Direct StoreDelivery (DSD)Ready Stock
DSD Pre-sell
DSD Tel- sell
Companymanaged
Clearing &Forwarding
Agent (C&FA)managed
Directfromdepot/plant
FeederTruck
BulkBreak
Anchordistributor
Distributor
Area MarketContractor(AMC)
Full load fromplant/depot
Milk run
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
10/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 10 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
How Each Model Works: Diagrammatic Representation
* C&FA Clearing and Forwarding Agent
AMC Area Market Contractor
2.1.2 Direct Distribution Models: On Basis of Order Taking
DSD Ready Stock Model
A Direct Van Sales/DSD Ready Stock is a type of direct distribution model in which the same person sells anddelivers the product in the same visit to a customer.
DDiirreecctt DDiissttrriibbuuttiioonn mmooddeell sseerrvviicceess oouurr ccuussttoommeerrsswwiitthhoouutt tthhee iinnvvoollvveemmeenntt ooff aannyy iinntteerrmmeeddiiaarriieess.. OOuurrpprroodduuccttss aarree ddeelliivveerreedd ddiirreeccttllyybbyy oouurr rroouuttee ttrruucckkttoo tthhee ccuussttoommeerr ssttoorree..
Plant
Consumer
Direct Distribution:Metro
C&FA/DepotFor Far
Flun Areas
Distributor
Customer/Retailer
Indirect Distribution:Power Town/Small Town
Distributor
Plant
MilkRun/Distributor Small
AMC*
Indirect Distribution: Rural
FeederTruck/Bulk
Break
Plant
AnchorDistributor
/Distributor
Ownwarehouse/CF
&A*(De ot/Godown
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
11/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 11 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of DSD Model
The company salesman:
Improves customer retention.
Builds customer relationship.
Realizes additional sales opportunities.
Obtains first-hand information about the market.
Advantages of Pre-sell
Efficient use of trucks
Easier to introduce new brandsand packages
More sophisticated selling for keyaccounts
Return to Table of Contents
Company salesman directly contacts the customers store at the Point-of-Sale and sells our products.
DSD - Pre-sell Model
A pre-sell is a type of direct distribution model in which the salesman sells on one day and merchandises on anotherday. This means that the salesman would first visit the outlet, generate an order and then pass on the order todispatch for delivery.
This system is used:
To service outlets with complex buying patterns where its difficult to forecast demand.
To improve vehicles productivity.
Pre-seller Delivery Man
DeliveryMerchandisingOrder Taking
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
12/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 12 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of Tel-sell
Low-cost of order taking (up to 100customers a day per tel-seller)
Limitations of Tel-sell
No face-to-face contact withcustomers
Requires highly reliable anddeveloped phone system
Return to Table of Contents
DSD - Tel-sell Model
The tel-seller takes orders over telephone, and the delivery man delivers on same day or next day. Merchandising isdone along with delivery or by market developers in case they have been deployed.
Responsibility Matrix
Responsibility Matrix for Direct Distribution OperationsDirect
DistributionModel
Activities
AccountMgt.
Merchandising OrderGeneration
Dispatch Warehousing Invoicingand CashCollection
Delivery
DSD-ReadyStock
SE/MD MD/Salesman Salesman C&FADispatcher
DepotExecutive
Salesman Salesman
DSD-Pre-sell SE/MD MD MD C&FADispatcher
DepotExecutive
Salesman Driver/Loader
DSD Tel-Sell SE/MD MD TeleExecutive
C&FADispatcher
DepotExecutive
Salesman Driver/Loader
* * SE: Sales ExecutiveMD: Market DeveloperC&FA: Clearing and Forwarding Agent
Tel-sellerDelivery Man
DeliveryMerchandisingSelling
Market Developer
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
13/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 13 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
2.1.3 Direct Distribution Models: On Basis of Management Control
Company Managed
The entire gamut of activities in the DSD operation is carried out directly by the company.
All the risks associated with selling and distribution of good, etc. rest with the company.
The infrastructure and fleet may be hired or owned by the company.
Clearing & Forwarding Agent (C&FA) Managed
The ownership of goods remains with the company till the time the product reaches the retail outlet (in effectthe stock in warehouse belongs to the company).
Risks associated with selling and distribution of goods, managing labor relations, etc. are shared between theClearing and Forwarding Agent (C&FA) and the company, depending on the agreement drawn up.
In most cases, day-to-day administration, especially management of labor and of filled and empty flow, is putin charge of the Clearing and Forwarding Agent (C&FA).
Risk of loss of stock/ theft is also transferred to the Clearing and Forwarding Agent (C&FA).
2.1.4 Direct Distribution Models: On Basis of Delivery Mechanism
Feeder Truck Model
This is a distribution mechanism wherein feeder trucks act as our mobile depots to service our routevehicles.
It allows us to replenish our route vehicles on the route itself in cases where:o The plant or depot is far off from the markets.o It is unviable for the route vehicles to plan a return trip to re-load stocks.
Use of such feeder trucks thereby minimizes the instances of stock outs both on the route and in routevehicles.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
14/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 14 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of Direct Distribution
Improved customer service
Service levels to accounts are assured always, asunlike a distributor who may look at discontinuingroutes that do not offer him a healthy return, DSDroutes run with more commitment and regularity, beingfocused long-term benefits of servicing accounts.
Since DSD is managed and controlled by thecompany, third party issues (like stock outs due toinsufficient funds), do not arise, leading to better
customer service.
Strengthened partnerships and simpler accountmanagement as the company salesman is in directpersonal contact with the accounts
Increased Speed & Efficiency through:
Automation (i.e. handhelds) eliminates manual errors
Faster placement of newproducts/innovations/designs to market, as nointermediary is involved
Limitations of Direct DistributionInitial investment outlay of the companycan be high as compared to an indirectdistribution because it involves purchase offleet and certain other investments etc.
A DSD operation would normally have ahigher running costas compared toindirect distribution, especially when totalvolumes are low.
The company is directly exposed to all
external affairs and environmental risks.
Return to Table of Contents
Bulk Break Model (Direct)
Bulk break distribution mechanism is used to service:
o Markets with inaccessible roads where our trucks cannot goo Markets where traffic conditions make distribution using our trucks difficulto Markets where appointment of a sound distributor/AMC is not possibleo Markets having non-exclusive Area Market Contractors (AMCs) who do not co-operate with us
usually due to the discount structure, other issues, etc.
Route trucks reach in the vicinity of the above markets with stocks and salesmen. The salesmen then unloadthe stocks into trolleys and take them to the otherwise inaccessible retail outlets.
2.1.5 Advantages and Limitations of Direct Distribution Models
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
15/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 15 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of Anchor Distributor Model
Risk and responsibility of managing selling& distribution operations is transferred todistributor, as the ownership of goods lieswith the distributors.
Company can use its resources and time tofocus on its market development objectivesfor that particular geography.
Better market service and accountrelationship is assured, as the companytakes care of account management and thecosts of the anchor distributor (due to which hewill have no issues in consistently and regularlyrunning all routes as decided by the companyirrespective of the season).
Limitations of Anchor DistributorModel
Being a third party, an anchordistributor has to necessarily buystock from the company and cancause delays and operationalissues, such as not buying stock inpre-defined quantities or timeperiod, delaying payments, etc.
Higher Cost Per Case (CPC) thana normal distributor
Return to Table of Contents
2.1.6 Indirect Distribution Models: On Basis of Size and Type
Anchor Distributor Model
Who is anchor distributor?
As the name suggests, an anchor distributor is a big size distributor who is our mainstay in a market that is not largeenough to warrant a DSD operation but at the same time is big enough to get the benefits of a DSD operation.
How does the model work?
The business model is designed and operated exactly on the lines of a DSD operation but with lesser directrisk, as the title of goods is transferred to the anchor distributor after they get invoiced and receive the goodsfrom the company.
The payment model is combination of fixed and variable. All fixed costs are reimbursed. When volume goesup, the benefits come to the company.
The anchor distributor gets paid/reimbursed for all his operating expenses and also gets a fixed return,thereby limiting his financial risk.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
16/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 16 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of Distributor Model
Low cost operation, as distributors are localindividuals/firms who operate out of aparticular geography. In case of distributorshaving complementary lines, the overall coststructure of the distributors becomes low, asthe operating costs get apportioned to all linesmanaged by him.
Risk and responsibility of managing selling& distribution operations is transferred todistributor, as the ownership of goods lieswith the distributors.
Company can use its resources and time tofocus on its market developmentobjectives for that particular geography.
Provides information/recommendation onexpanding the footprint of the company in aparticular geography, as the distributor knowsthe area and enjoys good local retailrelationships.
Easy entrance into new channels where thedistributors have complementary lines
Distributors can extend and track creditand Cases On Loan (COL) to the localmarket (which the company is unable to do),as they are local parties with limited businesssize and limited number of retail outlets to dealwith.
Limitations of Distributor Model
Withdrawal of low-return serviceroutes in off-peak season, affectingthe companys ability to reachconsumers in such geographies.
Distributors in some cases can alsotend to emphasize products/brand-packs that are easy to sell but may
not be in-line with companysmarketing objectives.
Being third party intermediaries,distributors can cause operationalissues in their defined territories incases where they have some financialconstraints or any other personalproblems (which could not beanticipated at the time of theirappointment).
Return to Table of Contents
Distributor Model
Who is a distributor?
Distributor is a third party intermediary who purchases stock from us and further redistributes to retail outlets providing
quality service to them at an optimal cost.
Such intermediaries or distributors are typically appointed in any or all of the following situations:
When reaching the customers directly is not economically viable for the company through a DSD operation
When markets are very far from sales center and have low volumes
When markets are in a very challenging external affairs environment
When market is fragmented and with low VPO
How does the model work?
Distributors are normally paid on a per cases sold basis for the services rendered by them.
The ownership of goods gets transferred to the distributors after the stock gets invoiced to and received bythem.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
17/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 17 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Responsibility Matrix for Distributor and Anchor Distributor OperationsDirect
DistributionModel
Activities
AccountMgt.
Merchandising OrderGeneration
Dispatch Warehousing
Invoicing andCash Collection
Delivery
Distributor SE/MD Distributor
Salesman/MD
Distributor
Salesman
Distributor Distributor Distributor
SalesmanDistributor
SalesmanAnchor
DistributorSE/MD Anchor
DistributorSalesman**/
MD
AnchorDistributor
Salesman**/MD
AnchorDistributor
AnchorDistributor
AnchorDistributorSalesman
AnchorDistributorSalesman
** The Anchor Distributor salesman, though on Anchor Distributors payroll, is selected and chosen by the companyrepresentatives based on the eligibility criteria specified by the company.
Area Marketing Contractor (AMC) Model
Who is an Area Marketing Contractor (AMC)?
An Area Marketing Contractor (AMC) typically is a very small distributor who normally cannot take a full truck loadfrom the plant and hence needs to purchase stock from another distributor in smaller lots.
Area Marketing Contractors (AMCs) are generally required in the following types of markets:
Markets with low Volume per Outlet (VPO)
Markets with very high contribution of returnable glass and low case strength, which necessitates highfrequency of service
Congested areas that are inaccessible by typical distributor vehicles such as LCVs, autos, vans, etc.
High credit requirements coupled with great credit risk (both of which can only be fulfilled by a local entity)
Far-flung markets where the volume is high enough to warrant a distribution entity, but low enough to becatered directly from the plant/depot
How does Area Marketing Contractor (AMC) model work?
The AMC gets compensated on a per case basis, part of which is funded by the company and the balance bythe distributor.
Depending upon the intensity (i.e. whether he has mechanized or non-mechanized operations), AMCcompensation may vary.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
18/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 18 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of Distributor AMC Model
Regular service assured for smallmarkets, which do not get serviced on aregular beat or warrant a full load from theplant
Local AMCs normally have good localrelationships and can extend credit in
Cases on Loan (COL) with less risk asthey are physically present in the area.
Long-term possibility to convert AMCsinto regular distributors who canreceive full truckloads from the plant, asthe AMC distributors gradually grow insize.
Limitations of Distributor AMC Model
Increased cost as one layer increases in thedistribution set up
Over-reporting of sales by distributor orsalesmen: The distributor may over-reportsales to the AMC leading to leakages. Also, ifthe AMC is part of a DSD route, there is a
possibility of over-reporting of sales by thesalesman. In extreme cases, both possibilitiescould occur simultaneously. Hence, it isimportant to have separate AMC routes andfix upper limit/capping in their volumes.
Outlet-level sales data may not available fora small set up.
Return to Table of ContentsTypes of Area Marketing Contractor (AMC) Model
1. AMC as a sub-distributor in a cityIn cities, there are certain markets with characteristics that necessitate the use of AMCs. Typically, theseareas are:
Slums
Low-cost housing areas with inaccessible roads
Old city wholesale markets where traffic conditions make distribution difficult
Certain areas which absorb a lot of credit and/or COL, which the company may not be able toextend
It is recommended that these AMCs should be directly supplied by the plant as in case of a normal distributoror as a Milk Run from the plant to prevent double handling in a city distributor godown.
2. AMC as a sub-distributor in upcountryIn rural markets, there are certain markets that have the characteristics described in the previous variation ofthe AMC model. Typically, these areas are groups of villages that are too few in number and too low involume to merit a regular outlet-wise beat plan, but high enough to merit distribution.
3. Non-exclusive AMC Operations
Such an AMC model is typically operational in large metros like Mumbai and New Delhi (at times referred toas FAT agents).
It is characterized by a market where there are only wholesale operations, i.e. a local wholesaler breaks bulkand distributes products of many beverage companies. No company-controlled operation in present in thatarea.
This type of an operation has notable drawbacks such as loss of control, excessive and competitivediscounting to stay in that market, etc.
This model is not recommended and the company should try other means like bulk break to directly coverthese markets.
Advantages and Limitations of AMC Model
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
19/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 19 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Advantages of Milk Run Model
Ensures distribution in low-volumeseasonal rural markets/ towns that do not
warrant a full truck load but are located closeto the plant
Enables the company to service C & Dclass distributors with annual volumeranges between 4,000 to 15,000 c/s.
Eliminates payment delay issues: Thedistributor presents the demand draft at thetime of receiving goods from the milk run van
Being operated by the company, Milk runensures all points are covered, unlike atransporter who is at times unable to cater tomore than 2 drop points.
Simpler vehicle planning, as orders areusually collected a day prior to the delivery
Limitations of Milk Run Model
Delays in truck turnaroundin case of communication gapbetween company anddistributors who fall on the milkrun route.
Misuse of the system bysome larger distributors fortheir own convenience whoshould ideally get full load fromthe plant.
Return to Table of Contents
2.1.7 Indirect Distribution: Delivery Mechanism
Full Load from Warehouse/Plant
This is the most common distribution mechanism for feeding our distributors. Distributors place a full truck-load orderon our plant or depots, and a full truck load gets dispatched.
The truck load can vary in size ranging from a payload capacity of 5.5 tons to 16 tons. The most commonly usedpayload capacity is 9 tons.
Milk Run
This distribution mechanism is usually used in upcountry markets to service small distributors or AMCs who cannotake a direct truck load from the plant/depot but still warrant service from the company and are also located relatively
close to our plant/depot.
This can also be used to service small distributors who cannot take full load from a plant in a city.
How does Milk Run work?
Milk runs involve consolidating multiple shipments to make a full truck load and dropping off small lots at multiplelocations.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
20/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 20 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Chapter 2.2:RTM Diagnostics: Selecting an RTM Model
Introduction
In the previous chapter, we covered list of various RTM models. However, next we need to focus on:
Analyzing effectiveness of current RTM
Selecting ideal RTM model for different types of market
An ideal RTM should deliver :
Ideal service level: On-Time In-Full (OTIF) to all retail outlets measured through retail satisfaction
survey and right numeric availability Sufficient distributor ROI and net take home per month
Right CPC, calculated as a percentage of NR for the company
For each type of market and our distribution objective in that market, we need to identify the right RTMmodel which meets the above principles.
In this chapter, we cover how to:
First diagnose the current state of RTM in a market.
Then choose an RTM model for different types of market.
2.2.1 Market Classification
Market Type MPV Range
Metro A > 200
Metro B >20 < 200
Power Town > 3 < 20
Rural A Below 3
Rural B Below 1
Refer toAnnexure Kfor list of various Indian cities that fall under each market type.
AAss aa ffiirrsstt sstteepp wwhhiillee iiddeennttiiffyyiinngg iiddeeaall RRTTMM,,ccllaassssiiffyy mmaarrkkeettss iinnttoo mmaannaaggeeaabbllee eennttiittiieess wwiitthhaa ssiimmiillaarr mmaarrkkeett ccoonnddiittiioonn wwiitthh rreessppeecctt ttooddiissttrriibbuuttiioonn..
CCllaassssiiffiiccaattiioonn iiss bbaasseedd oonn MMaarrkkeett PPootteennttiiaallVVoolluummee ((MMPPVV))..
http://annexures/Annexure_K_MPV_Town_MPVs___Population.xlshttp://annexures/Annexure_K_MPV_Town_MPVs___Population.xlshttp://annexures/Annexure_K_MPV_Town_MPVs___Population.xls -
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
21/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 21 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
2.2.2 RTM Diagnostics
Distribution Effectiveness Index
The effectiveness of distribution in various markets is evaluated based on certain criteria. These criteria vary for
metros and power towns as depicted in the diagrams below.
Evaluation Criteria for Metros
FF
oo
rr
ee
aa
cc
hh
oo
ff
tthh
ee
mm
aa
rrkk
ee
ttss
,,
dd
ee
ffiinn
ee
aa
cc
llee
aa
rr
DD
iiss
ttrriibb
uu
ttiioo
nn
OObbjjeeccttiivvee bbaasseedd oonn tthhee ffoolllloowwiinngg ppaarraammeetteerrss::
IIss oouurr ccuurrrreenntt ddiissttrriibbuuttiioonn eeffffeeccttiivvee?? IIss oouurr ccuurrrreenntt ddiissttrriibbuuttoorr ssttrroonngg eennoouugghh??
METROMARKETS
Swing in Numeric Availability of Lead SKU
Volume Performance
Swing in Market Share
% of Distributors/Routes >Break Even Volume BEV
Stability ofStructure (% New
Distributors/Routes
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
22/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 22 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Evaluation Criteria for Other Towns
Rating Each Parameter
Rating Limits For Metros
RED(0) YELLOW(1) WHITE (2)
Numeric Availability Swing > -5% In Between >=0%
Market Share Swing >-2% In Between >+2%
Volume Growth/Decline >-10% In Between >=0%
% of Distributors >Break Even Volume(BEV)
66%
Stable Distribution (% New Distributors) >33% In Between Break Even Volume BEV
Stability ofStructure (% NewDistributors/Rout
RESTDISTRIBUTOR
AREAS
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
23/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 23 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Rating Limits For Other Towns
RED(0) YELLOW(1) WHITE (2)
Volume Growth/Decline >-10% In Between >=0%
% of Distributors > Break Even Volume(BEV)
66%
Stable Distribution (% New Distributors) >33% In Between
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
24/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 24 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Using Distribution Effectiveness Model: Example
The example below uses the distribution effectiveness model for RTM diagnosis of three metro cities: City A, City B,and City C.
Rating Distribution Effectiveness in the three cities.
1. Each city is rated on distribution effectiveness parameters.
NumericSwing
VolumePerformance
MarketShare
% ofDistributorgreaterthan BEV
Stability ofStructure(New%)
Net Score Sales/MPV
City A 0 -5% 0% 33% 8% 7 10.23
City B -16 -3% 6% 0% 16% 5 7.39City C -1 -8% -9% 17% 0% 4 8.21
2. Based on the rating limits for metros, thered, yellow, and white bands are assigned to each value.
NumericSwing
VolumePerformance
MarketShare
% ofDistributorgreater thanBEV
Stability ofStructure(New%)
Net Score Sales/MPV
City A 0 -5% 0% 33% 8% 7 10.23
City B -16 -3% 6% 0% 16% 5 7.39
City C-1 -8% -9% 17% 0% 4 8.21
3. Based on the red, yellow, and white bands, Distribution Effectiveness Index is calculated.
Red = 0; Yellow = 1; White = 2
For City A
2 whites = 2 x 2 = 43 yellows = 1 x 3 = 3
Net Distribution Effectiveness Index = 4 + 4 = 7
Similarly, Distribution Effectiveness Index for City B = 5, and City C = 4.
Distribution Effectiveness Index reflects: City A market is near ideal. It needs slight correction.
Cities B and C markets need immediate corrections in the distribution.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
25/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 25 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
4. Next, market prioritization is done by plotting the Distribution Effectiveness Index on the Opportunity Matrix.
City A
City BCity C
5. Based on the diagnostic results, specific action plan is worked out.
For example, the diagnostic results and findings for City B are depicted below; based on these, theRTM plan is worked out.
Distribution Effectiveness Index
SalesOpportunityin000
250
0
500
0 5 8
Note: Sales Opportunity is calculated after benchmarking it with the average Sales/MPV index of8.6.
Town 1 -1% 0% 0% 3 Merge Distributors
Town 2 -9% 0% 0% 3 Merge Distributors
Town 3 -8% 100% 0% 5 Ok.
Town 4 1% 100% 0% 6 Ok.
Town 5 -5% 100% 0% 5 Ok.
Town 6 -8% 0% 0% 3 Merge Distributors
Town 7 -21% 100% 0% 4 Market Correction Required ?
Town 8 -6% 100% 0% 5 Ok.
Town 9 4% 0% 0% 4 Dist is viable at 40K.
Town 10 13% 0% 0% 4 Merge Distributors
Town 11 -27% 0% 0% 2 Market Correction Required ?
Town 12 -15% 0% 0% 2 Market Correction Required ?
Town 13 -13% 0% 0% 2 Scarp Hub & Spoke
Town 14 -20% 0% 0% 2 Market Correction Required ?
Towns 3, 4, 5, and 8 areamongst the most stabledistribution.
Towns 1, 2, 6, and 10require merging ofdistributors.
Towns 7, 11, 12, 13, and
14, require immediatecorrection.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
26/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 26 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Distributor Strength Index
This is the second level of analysis to further diagnose the source of distribution weakness or possibility of weaknessarising at a later date.
Both objectively as well as subjectively, a distributor is measured on certain parameters (listed below) to derive his
strength in a particular area.
We need to make sure that our distributor in the area is a long term and highly aligned Market Execution partner. In agiven geography, he is our key representative for the customers. If we have a strong, aligned, and satisfied partner,then we will be able to ensure highly-satisfied customers - which is our key goal.
It is difficult to measure a distributors strength/weakness on an objective basis only, as there are a lot of personaltraits like aggressiveness in market, which though can be captured through indicators like market share still may notgive a full picture. Say, there is a non-customer friendly distributor in a historically high share market area with acurrently weak competing distributor; he will give us a false sense of security in the market and as well a set ofdissatisfied customers as well.
In this section, we make an attempt to rate the strength of our distributor in a more objective and a comprehensiveway.
We measure a distributor on the following heads, each allocated different weightages, as listed below:
Level of InfrastructureInvestments vs. required
Investments(on 10-point scale)
25 %weightage
o Vehicle no. actual vs.required 5/10 Maxweightage of 5 per
parameter (excessinvestment is also notgood)
o Glass Actual vs Required 5/10
Overall Financial Strength(break-up as below)
25 %weightage
oObjective FinancialStrength (points 10) 15 %weightage
Points on Stock investmentfor 100% investment&proportionate for each%age point up to a max limit
1 point for every Rs.1/- creditper cs annual volume, up toa maximum of 4 points
oSubjective FinancialStrength (points 10) 10%weightage
A persons financialstrength/status may not getcaptured in the abovenumbers alone. Here the
Area Sales Manager (ASM) /Sales Executive (SE) canrate a person based on theirknowledge of the personsfinancial status.
Level and Strength of MarketRelationships & Level ofMarket Aggressiveness
50 %weightage
o Relationship (ObjectiveMeasure) (Points 10) 30% weightage
No of years spent as adistributor Half point for eachyear spent in KO system
2 points for 100% service level& proportionate points forlower service levels
1 point for every Rs. 2 creditper case on an annualizedvolume (upper limit for allpoints)
2 points for every 50 % REDscore
o Relationship (Subjective)(Points 10) 20%
weightage Level of marketaggressiveness and customersatisfaction based on SalesTeam rating (customersatisfaction survey in certainkey markets can also becarried out to objectify a partof this parameter).
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
27/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 27 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Note: First the objective score needs to be calculated and then the subjective score needs to be put down. This isbecause it is always better to first get an unbiased true evaluation on real time numbers. If there is too much variationbetween the objectives vs. the subjective assessment, the same needs to be explained.
Refer toAnnexure Nfor calculating the distributor strength score, as mentioned above.
The maximum distributor strength score would be 10.
To reiterate the content till now:
In the previous section, we had calculated the effectiveness of distribution through a full analysis of key businessindicators at town level.
In this section, we went to a second level of diagnosis which is the distributor level for each town that will help indrawing up a specific distributor level action plan.
Distributor Strength vs. Distribution Effectiveness
In this section, we try to plot the Distribution Strength Index versus the Distribution Effectiveness Index which will give
us a clear direction needed to be taken in the market
Distributor ROI
Target an ideal ROI of twice the bank rate (In current circumstances 18% = 2 * 9%)
Ensure a minimum ROI of 15% for each distributor.
Review the ROI half-yearly for all A class distributors and once a year for the rest.
If ROI is
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
28/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 28 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
2.2.3 Choosing an RTM Model
For each of the types of markets, identify the possible models and choose the best one based on requirements.
On a broad level a very directional grid based on Volume of the Area and Market Type (as shown below) canbe used to know the possible RTM model for an area.
At a much more deeper level a grid as shown below can be used to determine the ideal model as well as the RTMdirection to take for the market.
DirectDistribution
MARKET VOLUME
Metro
Rural
HighLow
MARKETTYPE
PowerTown
AnchorDistributor
Distributor/AMC
AnchorDistributor/
Direct
Distributor/Anchor
Distributor
Distributor(Rural)+ Milk
Run
AnchorDistributor/Distributor
Distributor
Distributor(Rural)+Milk
Run
DISTRIBUTION EFFECTIVENESS Index
Metro A
Rural B
LeadLag
MARKETTYPE
PowerTown
DSD (Clearingand ForwardingA ent C&FA
DSD (C&FA)Build Operate -
Transition
Anchor DistrBuild Operate -
Transition
Distributorneeds change
Distributor(Rural) + Milk
Route
DSD (C&FA)
AnchorDistributor
Distributor
Ideally singleviable distributor
Distributor(Rural) + Milk
DSD (C&FA)
AnchorDistributor
Distributor to beretained
Distributor to beretained
Distributor AMC
Rural A
Metro B
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
29/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 29 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Chapter 2.3:Two-year RTM Roadmap
Introduction
In the above chapters, we have covered:
1. Various RTM models which are or can be in operation in an area2. Deriving ideal model matrix by evaluating market types and the distribution objective of an area based
on current level of distribution effectiveness, distributor strength, and distributor ROI.
Finally, we need to now inculcate the above diagnosis and principles into action on the ground. This chaptercovers the 2-year RTM roadmap that will help put the process in place for executing and monitoring RTMcorrection plan.
2.3.1 RTM Planning (Town and Distributor-wise)
For the ABP RTM planning:
1. The UCSM along with the sales team should chart outby Metro, Power Town, and Rural, the currentdistribution effectiveness index and distributor strengthindex.
2. The current Distributor ROI needs to be calculated for alldistributors.
3. The desired RTM model needs to be selected based onthe directional grid as well the above factors.
4. The flow from the current RTM to the desired RTMneeds to be charted on a two-year timeframe.
TThhee RRTTMM aannaallyyssiiss aanndd ddiirreeccttiioonn sseettttiinngg nneeeeddss ttoobbee iinnccuullccaatteedd iinnttoo tthhee AAnnnnuuaall BBuussiinneessss PPllaannnniinngg
rroocceessss aatt tthhee uunniittss..
2006 2007 2008
CurrentRTM
DesiredRTM
Phase IRTM
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
30/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 30 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Heres an example illustrating RTM planning town and distributor-wise, using the approachdescribed above.
Say, theres a sample Area Sales Manager (ASM) territory with metro power town and rural markets. The areadetails includingdistributor wise outlets, volume, and growth over previous year, are displayed in the excelsheet below.
For RTM Planning:
1. We first draw up the current RTM Photography post carrying out all the relevant diagnostics in the previoussection.
Name of Town Type of Town Population Outlets Volume
s r u o
r
Effectivess index DistrName Outlets Volume LY Vol Gr vs PY
Distributor
StrenghtIndex CurrentDistr ROI Current RTMModel
City A Metro B 1,000,000 2,564 461,780 5 D 1 750 150000 5% 8 17% 10 Distr Town
D 2 330 59400 -10% 6 15% 10 Distr Town
D 3 180 23400 -20% 5 12% 10 Distr Town
D 4 300 60000 4% 7 17% 10 Distr Town
D 5 220 44000 -5% 5 13% 10 Distr Town
D 6 94 11280 -30% 3 8% 10 Distr Town
D 7 120 16800 -18% 6 10% 10 Distr Town
D 8 140 23800 8% 7 14% 10 Distr Town
D 9 300 51000 2% 4 10% 10 Distr Town
D 10 130 22100 2% 5 12% 10 Distr Town
Town A Power Town 120,000 287 37,321 2 D 11 201 26124 0% 7 10% Small 2 Distr Town
D 12 86 11196 -10% 4 -3% Small 2 Distr Town
Town X Rural 14,000 28 3,360 3 D 13 28 3360 -5% 6 12%
Currently an AMC
under a distributor
near the plant
Town Y Rural 14,000 25 3,000 2 D 14 25 3000 -10% 5 5%
Currently serviced
from plant as an
RD
SE 1
ASM 1
FFoorr RRTTMM ddiiaaggnnoossttiiccss,, wwee ccaallccuullaattee tthhee::
oo DDiissttrriibbuuttoorr EEffffeeccttiivveenneessss IInnddeexx::ccaallccuullaattiioonn sshhoowwnn iinn pprreevviioouuss sseeccttiioonn
oo DDiissttrriibbuuttoorr SSttrreennggtthh IInnddeexx:: CCaallccuullaattiioonnsshhoowwnn iinn tthhee pprreevviioouuss sseeccttiioonn
oo TThhee ccuurrrreennttDDiissttrriibbuuttoorr RROOIIoo TThheeccuurrrreenntt RRTTMM mmooddeell ffuunnccttiioonniinngg iinn
tthhee ttoowwnn
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
31/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 31 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
2. Based on the above data, we need to derive action plan by distributor for each city/town in the territory.
First, lets take City A which is a Metro B with 10 distributors.
We make following observations for City A based on data available:
The Distribution Effectiveness score is 5, which is definitely a reason for worry and needs immediateattention.
Very few distributors are making a healthy ROI; the ROI varies significantly from -3 % to +17 %.
Distributor Strength is also varying across all the parties.
Last year volume performance is also varying drastically between the distributors from 30% to +8 %.
Name of Town Type of Town Volume
Distributo
r
Effectives
s index
Distr
Name Volume LY Vol Gr vs PY
Distributor
Strenght
Index
Current
Distr ROI
Current RTM
Model DSD Anchor Distr Consolidation
City A Metro B 461,780 5 D 1 150000 5% 8 17% 10 Distr Town
Should be
converted to
Anchor with
main markets
of the city - Add
area D 5, D 7, D9 , D 10
D 2 59400 -10% 6 15% 10 Distr TownClose / Consolidate
with D 1
D 3 23400 -20% 5 12% 10 Distr TownClose / Consolidate
with D 1
D 4 60000 4% 7 17% 10 Distr TownContinue add D 6
area
D 5 44000 -5% 5 13% 10 Distr TownClose - Add area to
Anchor D1
D 6 11280 -30% 3 8% 10 Distr TownClose / Consolidate
with D 4
D 7 16800 -18% 6 10% 10 Distr TownClose - Add area to
Anchor D1
D 8 23800 8% 7 14% 10 Distr Town
Keep as he is in a n
isolated part of city
Needs support to
beefup ROI
D 9 51000 2% 4 10% 10 Distr TownClose - Add area to
Anchor D1
D 10 22100 2% 5 12% 10 Distr Town
Close - Add area to
Anchor D1
For key
Accounts
run DSD Pre
sell route
from the
plant
(Annual Vol
1 lac phy
cases) -
Since it is
plant town
Heres the detailed RTM plan drawn for City A:
Since City A is a Metro B town with a plant attached to it with a lot of prestigious and high volume keyaccounts, we should run a DSD pre-sell route from the plant for least RTM cost.
Since it is a Metro B, as per the RTM Directional Gridwe are proposing that we move to an AnchorDistributor Model.
The largest distributor in the city, D 1, is also having a high Distribution Strength of 8. So, we need to initiatediscussions with him to convert him to an Anchor Distributor.
We shut down a lot of unprofitable distributors like D 2 , D 3 , D 5, D 6, D 7, D 9, D 10, and merge withAnchor, or based on geographical location, merge with the other viable distributors we intend to continue.
Distributor D 8 is a sitting in a geographically isolated area that would be difficult to cover from the locationsof remaining distributors. Moreover, he relatively has a high Distributor Strength Index, so he needs tocontinue. His ROI is low, and need to re-look at his cost structure and see ways of improving his ROI.
RTM Plan
WWee hhaavvee aa llaarrggee ddiissttrriibbuuttoorr wwiitthh aahhiigghh DDiissttrriibbuuttoorr SSttrreennggtthh IInnddeexxaanndd RROOII.. HHee ccaann bbee llooookkeedd aatt aassAAnncchhoorr DDiissttrriibbuuttoorr..
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
32/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 32 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
So, summarizing the above, a 10-distributor Metro B Town with low Distribution Effectiveness Index andmany unprofitable distributors is converted to:
DSD route from plant for key accounts One large anchor distributor Two very viable and aligned distributors with a high Distributor Strength
Now we draw up the plan for Town A which is a Power Town:
Name of Town Type of Town Volume
Distributo
r
Effectives
s index
Distr
N am e V olu me LY V ol Gr vs PY
Distributor
Strenght
Index
Current
Distr ROI
Current RTM
M od el D SD An ch or D ist r C on so lid at io n
Town A Power Town 37,321 2 D 11 26124 0% 7 10% Small 2 Distr TownConsolidate Entire
Area under D 11
D 12 11196 -10% 4 -3% Small 2 Distr Town Close
The solution here is obvious; we need to merge the two areas under distributor D 11.
After merging, check the ROI. If we still have a problem, then we need to look at the cost structures of thedistributor and see how to improve his ROI.
Next we draw up the plan for Towns X and Y, which are rural areas.
Name of Town Type of Town Volume
Distributo
rEffectives
s index
Distr
Name Volume LY Vol Gr vs PY
DistributorStrenght
Index
Current
Distr ROI
Current RTM
Model Milk Run Distr AMC
Town X Rural 3,360 3 D 13 3360 -5% 6 12%
Currently an AMC
under a distributor
near the plant
As is near
plant area
convert to
milk Run
Town Y Rural 3,000 2 D 14 3000 -10% 5 5%
Currently serviced
from plant as an
RD
Very far from plant
needs to be
attatched to nearest
Distributor as AMC
RTM PLAN
Town X is actually near the plant area and can be converted to a Milk Run Route. As he, becomes a directdistributor his commission will go up and hence his ROI will improve.
In Town Y:
o We have a distributor with a low Distributor Strength as well as low ROI.
o The distributor is a small distributor and his viability is going down, as he has to invest in largequantity of stock relative to his volume because of distance from the plant.
This is a Power Town with two distributorsboth of whom are not having sufficientvolume, ROI, and Distributor Strength
index for one of them is really low.
TThhee DDiissttrriibbuuttiioonn EEffffeeccttiivveenneessss iissvveerryy llooww aanndd RRTTMM ccoorrrreeccttiioonn iissaann iimmmmeeddiiaattee iimmppeerraattiivvee..
In both towns X and Y, theDistribution effectiveness index isvery low. The Distribution Strength isnot sufficient and current ROI is understress.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
33/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 33 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
o He needs to be shifted under a Distributor in a Distributor AMC kind of model. His AMCcommission needs to be worked out to make sure he is viable.
o Given the low Distributor Strength, we may even look at changing the distributor and setting up anew AMC party altogether.
The key actions based on the above analysis would be any of the following:
DSD in certain locations with percentage of DSD volume targeted
Anchor distributors in certain locations with percentage of anchor distributor volume target
Distributor consolidation
Start of Milk Run and percentage of volume to flow through the same
Markets where Area Market Contractors (AMCs) need to come up and number of AMCs (a very smalldistributor may have to be made an AMC, and some new locations may need to be identified to start up AMCoperations).
Below is a sample RTM Action Plan template.
IInn tthhee aabboovvee mmaannnneerr,, tthhee aaccttuuaall vvss.. ddeessiirreedd nneeeeddss ttoo bbee wwoorrkkeeddoouutt ffoorr eeaacchh aarreeaa,, aanndd aafftteerr ccoommpprreehheennssiivvee ddiissccuussssiioonn bbeettwweeeenn
UUCCSSMM aanndd SSMM,, tthhee UUCCSSMM nneeeeddss ttoo pprrooppoossee tthhee ffiinnaall ppllaann bbyy SSEEaarreeaa ttoo tthhee GGMM aanndd tthhee RRCCSSMM ffoorr ffiinnaall aapppprroovvaall..
TThhee RRTTMM AAccttiioonn PPllaann nneeeeddss ttoo cclleeaarrllyy mmeennttiioonn tthhee ttiimmeelliinneess aannddppeerrssoonn rreessppoonnssiibbiilliittiieess.. TThhiiss aaccttiioonn ppllaann nneeeeddss ttoo ffllooww iinnttoo tthheeAAnnnnuuaall BBuussiinneessss PPllaann ((AABBPP))..
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
34/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 34 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
2.3.2 RTM Roadmap: Integration into Annual Business Plan (ABP)
On an all India level, the RTM footprint directionally is expected to be as depicted below:
FFiinnaall AASSMM lleevveell ppllaannss nneeeedd ttoo ggeett iinnttoo tthhee AABBPPwwhhiicchh wwiillll ffoorrmm tthhee bbaassee ddooccuummeenntt ffoorr RRTTMMccoorrrreeccttiioonnss bbeeffoorree nneexxtt yyeeaarr..
Direct: 60 %
Anchor: 5 %
In-direct: 35 %
In-direct: 100%
In-direct: 85%
Distr & AMC: 14%
Milk run 1%
CURRENT
High drop size, high growth potentialmarket converted to CBO run DSD
Robust and sustainable AnchorDistributors Appointed.
Unviable & Unsustainable distributors to be rationalizedStable Distributors consolidated, territories enlarged.High VPO, high NR markets, converted to Anchor / DSD
Unviable & Unsustainable Distributorsclosed
Sustainable spokes supported /converted to distributors.
Small geographically far spreaddistributors serviced by Milk Runs
HVO, Key A/C converted to Pre -sell
Rural
PowerTown
Metro
End 08
Direct: 75 %
Anchor: 20 %
In-direct: 5 %
In-direct: 85%
In-direct: 80%
Distr AMC: 10%
Milk run 10%
DSD/Anchor:15%
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
35/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 35 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
f
Systems
DistributionInfrastructureOptimization
RTM Correction
End 08
Stock Availability : 97%
No of Distributors: 2500 Metro DSD % : 75% Metro Pre-sell % : 40% Business thru Anchor : 15% Cost as % NR : 12%
Business under DAS : 60% of indirect
Business under CRS : 60% of indirect Handheld : All Metro DSD DSD Router : All Metro DSD
No of warehouses : Fleet uptime : 90% Glass Turns : 5.5 Audit Score : 85%
Current
Stock Availability : 92%
No of Distributors: 3500 Metro DSD % : 60% Metro Pre-seill % : 14% Business thru anchor : 3% Cost as % NR : 14%
Business under DAS : 3% of indirect
Business under CRS : 31% of indirect Handheld @ DSD: 2 Metro, 8% of Vol DSD Router : Nil
No of warehouses : Fleet uptime : 70% Glass Turns : 4.1
RTM Roadmap
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
36/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 36 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
PART 3:RTM INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN AND
MANAGEMENT
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
37/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 37 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Chapter 3.1:DSD Operation
Introduction
Direct Store Delivery (DSD), commonly referred to as direct route operation, is a model focused on servicingcustomers without any intermediaries. It is a critical part of the RTM operations.
This chapter covers following DSD operations:
DSD route designing
Warehouse management
Stock management
Fleet management
Invoicing and settlement
DSD Cost Per Case (CPC) calculation
3.1.1 DSD Route Designing Process
Key inputs required for DSD Route Design
Pack-wise month-wise total volume and average season
Off-season drop size
Outlet base and EDS
High Volume Outlets (HVOs) exclusive outlets
Service frequency required by outlet
Geographical spread
Percentage of outlets and volume for pre-sell and ready van sale Channel construct of the area
Estimated channel-wise average In-outlet time
11 33
Get Data forEvery Dealer
44
CalculateNo. of Vehicles and
Vehicle CapacityRequired
CreateRoutes
CreateZones
22
LocateOutletson Map
55
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
38/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 38 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Get Data
Get complete EDS of all outlets with details like outlet name, address, annual volume, and service frequencyrequired by each outlet.
Sample EDS Data Required for Route Design
Outlet
No.
Route
No. Accou nt Nam e Addresses
Service
Freq.
Trade
Ch an ne l Volu m e
1 114 Alexus Deli 692 Greenwood 3x 147 12
2 117 Alph 's Bar and Grill 723 Angier Ave. 2x 020 8
3 114 Andriotti's Restauran t 578 North Ave. 2x 018 104 114 Athen ian Pizza 680 Greenwood 1x 018 9
5 118 Buggeh ti's 601 North Ave. 1x 018 30
6 116 Carl's Quick Stop 124 Win ton Terrace 1x 004 12
7 101 Ch ateau Efite 410 Rankin St. 1x 018 6
8 116 Ch inese Buffet 783 Angier Ave. 3x 018 9
9 120 Connie's Conven ience 550 Greenw ood 1x 003 14
10 122 Crown 's 212 Ponce De Leon 2x 147 18
11 112 Dante's Deli 598 Angier Ave. 1x 147 9
12 124 Deano's Diner 114 Morgan St. 1x 018 20
13 117 Dillion 's 215 Somerset 2x 020 6
14 114 Discotheque Unique 273 Ponce De Leon 1x 035 24
15 118 East of Eden 105 Somerset 1x 035 30
16 115 Fan Faire 218 Bonaventu re 1x 018 35
17 115 Fielder's Rest Stop 653 Ponce De Leon 3x 147 7
18 123 Freda's Lunch Room 109 Somerset 1x 018 15
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
39/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 39 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Locate Outlets on Map
Locate all the outlets gathered in step 1 on a map to get a complete picture of the area.
SAINT CHARLES WAY
SAINT CHARL ES AVE.
ONE
WAY
ONE
WAY
ONEWAY
ONEWAY
ONE
WAY
NORTH AVE.
EDITHS
T.
WILMER
EGGLESTON
ASH
LEY
AVE
.
RANKINRANKIN
ANGIER
ANGIERAVE.
RALP
H
WILLOUGHBY
EAST AVE.
TO PLANTWA
Y
ST.
AVE.
MORGAN
DALLAS
ST.
ST.
ST.
ST.ST.
EL
IZABETH
BERNIN
A
WILLIAM
SMCGIL
L
ENSL
EY
ST.
WOODALLST
.
BELG
RADE
AVE
.AN
GIER
SPRINGS RD.
LEON
MAIDENLA
GREENWOOD
SAINTCHARLES
GREENWOOD
AVE.
PONCE
BARNETT
FORD
PL.
AVE.DE
PONCEPONCEDE
LEONCT.
SOMERSET
TE
RR.
LAKEVIEW
AVE.
ARNOLD
DRIVE
IRIS
ARNOLD
ST.
ST.
BONAVENTURE
BARNETT
ST.
3
10
12
1113
18 19 20
2117
16
15
14
31 3024
23
25
22
6
3935
33
4041
38
32
42
3736
34
29 28
4 5
43
49 50
47
46
45
44
48
1
27
26
7
8
9
2
Outlets locatedand numbered
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
40/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 40 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Create Zones
Zones need to be created for a very large city. This helps in getting the average number of routes.
Create manageable zones based on proximity from supplying location.
Keep the zones geographically contiguous with natural locality boundaries.
Create zones in a way that the volumes are balanced in these zones.
Calculate No. of Vehicles and Vehicle Capacity
1. List all the outlets within a zone with the volumes and their required service frequencies.
2. Classify the outlets that can be on pre-sell (ideally all High Volume Outlets (HVOs) which havemonopoly should go on to pre-sell) and those for Ready Stock sale.
3. For all Ready Stock retail outlets in the zone, take the weighted average of the service frequency.
4. Take the average drop size for the zone.
Create separate routes for season and off season.
5. Each zone will have a known stem time (Driving time taken from Plant or Depot to the first outlet for aparticular route in the zone).
Here is a format for calculating time available:
1
2
3
4
5
67
9
8
1
1Sale
Center1 Cover outlying
areas first whilecreating zones.
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
41/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 41 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
Time Amount in
Minutes
1 In-plant Time - Morning
2 In-plant Time - Afternoon
3 Stem Time - Morning
4 Stem Time - Afternoon
5 Breaks
6 Total Number of Minutes: Time not available for route
7
8
9 Time in the Workday (___ hours X 60 minutes)
10 Less Time Not Available
11 Time Available per day
6. Then based on estimated in outlet and average between outlet time (based on geographical spread
of the area), calculate how many outlets can be done by a route in a day in a particular zone. This isof course after removing sufficient time for in Plant/Depot time.
7. Based on the weighted average service frequency for a zone, calculate the no. of days between twodeliveries as follows:
8. Calculate the number of outlets to be covered in a day in the zone
9. Calculate number of vehicle needed to service the area.
No. of outlets to be covered in a day in zone = Total outletsNo. of days between two deliveries
No. of vehicles needed in an area = Total outlets to be covered in a dayNo. of outlets one route can do in a day
No. of days between two deliveries = 6 (Total No. of Working Days in week)Avg. Service frequency
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
42/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 42 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
10. Calculate sale generated on a route in a day.
11. Vehicle capacity = Sale generated x 1.2
Since the vehicle need not carry the exact SKU mix as required by the outlets and the demandcould normally be variable, so 1.2 safety factor is taken into account.
This step is a gross level calculation of number of vehicles required and the possible capacity of thevehicle.
Finally, the exact routes still need to be drawn up before actual purchase decision of thevehicle is taken. This is covered later in this section.
Example showing how to calculate number of vehicles and vehicle capacity, based on formulaecovered above, and how hybrid system for routes can impact this requirement
Scenario 1
A zone has following details:
Total outlets = 600 outlets in peak seasonAverage drop-size = 2 cases per visit.Outlets the salesman can do in a day = 35Average service frequency required in the area = 3x.
Lets see how to find out the number of vehicles needed and their required capacity.
Sale generated on a route in a day =Average drop size per outletxNumber ofoutlets a route can do in a day
Accounts on pre-sell route
Accounts on conventional route
It is better to havehybrid system forroutes as onevehicle size does
not fit capacityrequired for all
-
7/31/2019 RTM Manual Draft
43/153
RTM Manual Version_Draft
Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages Pvt. Ltd.@copyright2007 Page 43 of 153 Strictly confidential; For internal use only
Return to Table of Contents
No. of days between deliveries = 6 / 3 = 2 (as per step 7 above)
No. of outlets to be covered in a day in zone = 600 / 2 = 300 (as per step 8 above)
No. of vehicles need