RSS Renovation Town Meeting Slideshow
-
Upload
mmceach -
Category
Technology
-
view
551 -
download
2
description
Transcript of RSS Renovation Town Meeting Slideshow
Overview russell street school project
Presentation Sequence Project Objectives School Building Committee Priorities Timeline Abatement/Repair Phasing Details
Mr. Carl Franceschi, President, DRA Educational & Safety Considerations
Dr. Diane Bemis, Superintendent, LPS Financial Recap
Mr. Steve Venuti, Treasurer, Town of Littleton Questions
Russell Street School repairs project
Repair Project Objectives
MechanicalElectricalPlumbingWindows
Accessibility (ADA)Fire ProtectionAsbestos Abatement
Project Team
School Building Committee
russell street school project
Richard Crowley – Chairman PMBC Jane Hall – Vice Chairman RSS Principal Joseph Collentro PMBC, Chairman Mark Mizzoni PMBC Jef Feehan PMBC Ronald Catella PMBC Paul Avella PMBC & School Committee Diane Bemis LPS Superintendent Steve Mark LPS Business Manager Keith Bergman Littleton Town Administrator Steve Venuti Littleton Town TreasurerNotes: 1. PMBC: Permanent Municipal Building Committee2. SBC organized and populated in accordance with applicable MGL and MSBA policy
Project Priorities russell street school project
Timeline russell street school project
Current 5th graders entered RSS Sep 2006 Initial Statement of Interest (SOI) Nov 2006 Follow-up SOI Nov 2007 MSBA on-site survey Nov 2007 EQA Jan 2008 Feasibility Study approval May 2008 OPM (Dadaelus) hired Nov 2008 Architect (DRA) hired Jan 2009 Feasibility Study Jan – May 2009 Presentation to MSBA March 2009 MSBA approval March 25, 2009 Town Meeting decision May 4, 2009 Ballot Question at Town Elections May 9, 2009
Tonight
russell street school project
Mr. Carl FranceschiPresident, DRA
Abatement/Repair Phasing
StrategicPlanning Document
Conceptdesign documentsStrategic
Planning Document
Documentfeasibility study
Collecting existing conditions
Optionsideas, goals & desires
Optionsideas, goals & desires
Listening collecting information
Listening collecting information
GO!
FEBJAN StrategicPlanning Document
Conceptdesign documentsStrategic
Planning Document
Documentfeasibility study
MAR APR MAY
feasibility study
Existing Conditions feasibility study
Families of Options feasibility study
feasibility studyFamilies of Options
feasibility studyOption Family B - renovationsB1. MULTI-PHASE - INTERNAL SWING
SCEHEME TEMPORARILY ELIMINATES:
FACILITY DIRECTOR + MAINTENANCE ROOMS
MUSIC ROOM / BAND STAGE AREA
ART ROOM
Project CostMSBA Reimb.
NET COST to LITTLETON
13.4M6.2M
7.2M
THIS SCHEME UTILIZES SWING SPACE IN THE ADJACENT MIDDLE SCHOOL TO SUPPORT THE ENTIRE 5TH GRADE (6 CLASSROOMS + A SPED AREA). CREATION OF ADDITIONAL INTERIOR SWING SPACE + OTHER ADJUSTMENTS TO THE PROGRAM ALLOW FOR FEASIBLE PHASING OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.SUMMER RECESS + WINTER RECESS OWNER RELOCATION ACTIVITIES WILL REQUIRE RESOURCES ON THE PART OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.EXTERIOR (MODULAR) ENCLOSED CORRIDOR WILL BE UTILIZED DURING PHASE 2 TO ACCOMMODATE CIRCULATION BETWEEN BLDG. A + C.STAGE AREA WILL BE CONVERTED TO 2 CLASSROOMS TO BE USED FOR CASE COLLABORATIVE ROOMS - (NOT HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE.)ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROJECTS WILL OCCUR OVER SUMMER MONTHS TO MITIGATE PARENTS/FACULTY CONCERNS W/ OCCUPATION DURING ABATEMENT EXERCISES.
feasibility study
PHASE 1
feasibility study
PHASE 1A
PHASE 2
RENOVATION SCOPE OF WORK:
- HVAC UPGRADE
- ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
- FIRE PROTECTION UPGRADE
- TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE
- NEW LIGHTING
- NEW CEILINGS + FLOORS
- PAINTING
- HANDICAPPED ACCESS UPGRADES
feasibility study
feasibility study
PHASE 3
RENOVATION SCOPE OF WORK:
- HVAC UPGRADE
- ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
- FIRE PROTECTION UPGRADE
- TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE
- NEW LIGHTING
- NEW CEILINGS + FLOORS
- PAINTING
- HANDICAPPED ACCESS UPGRADES
PHASE - 4
PHASE 4
RENOVATION SCOPE OF WORK:
- HVAC UPGRADE
- ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
- FIRE PROTECTION UPGRADE
- TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE
- NEW LIGHTING
- NEW CEILINGS + FLOORS
- PAINTING
- HANDICAPPED ACCESS UPGRADES
feasibility study
PHASE 2
RENOVATION SCOPE OF WORK:
- HVAC UPGRADE
- ELECTRICAL UPGRADE
- FIRE PROTECTION UPGRADE
- TECHNOLOGY UPGRADE
- NEW LIGHTING
- NEW CEILINGS + FLOORS
- PAINTING
- HANDICAPPED ACCESS
UPGRADES
feasibility study
5
Schedule / Work Plan
feasibility studyProject Cost Estimate
Ineligible Costs
Asbestos Abatement ($301,509)Other (incl legal) ($60,000)
Eligible District Budget $13,038,491
Reimbursement Rate 47.84%
Approximate Total Grant Amount $6,237,614
Total District Project Share $7,162,386
Project Cost Estimate
Project Cost Revisions
Adjustment to Construction Cost Estimate ($742,761)
Adjustment for Actual vs. assumed OPM Fees (370,000)
Adjustment to Project Contingency (59,000)
Adjustment to Construction Testing Budget (75,000)
Other Adjustments +24,079.00
Total of Adjustment - $1,222,682
Adjust for market conditions – recent bids Norwood, Malden
Daedalus fee actual less than DRA projection for that line item
Based on 8% of other adjustments
Further delineation of scope suggests less Constion Testing required
Original Project Budget $15,131,820submitted to MSBA 3/09
Revised Project Budget $13,909,138
delta (savings) $ 1,222,682Reconciled with Daedalus/ prepared for TM
Key Community Questions
what if?
We choose to do nothing . . .1
We choose to build new . . .2
Key Community Questions
what if?
We choose to do nothing . . .1Littleton will expend
$21 M vs $7.2 Min maintaining the Russell Street
School over the next 20-year timeframe
“Do Nothing” Scheme Costs
Construction Costs $11,094,110
Projects Costs $ 2,315,157
Premium costs for smaller bid packages estimated at 10% $ 1,340,913
INFLATION @ 3% per year $ 6,574,559
$21,324,739
due to system failure / maintenance over the next 20 years
including soft costs, engineering, bidding, testings, etc.
NOTE: There will be no state reimbursement share as part of this approach
“Do Nothing/ B5 Scheme Comparison
“DO NOTHING”
State Reimbursement 0
Littleton Share – “DO NOTHING” Scheme
$21,324,739
Littleton Share – Scheme B5 as proposed $7,162,386
B5 SCHEME
$21,324,739
vs
Key Community Questions
what if?We choose to build new . . .2
Littleton will expend
$26 M vs $7.2 M No MSBA Support likely
(the new construction number is not $15 million!)
New Construction Cost Analysis
$249.66$243.04
$341.06
$451.64
$294.01$290.00
$-
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
$350.00
$400.00
$450.00
$500.00
$$ / Sq. Ft
2009 Cost Per Square Foot
Construction Cost, Sq. Ft
Paul Revere SchoolRevere, MA
Norwood High SchoolNorwood, MA
Wellington SchoolBelmont, MA
BurlingtonBurlington, MA
Middleton ElementarySchoolMiddletown, MADRA Estimated Cost for New Construction perstudy
$315/sf avg.
“New / B5 Scheme Comparison
NEW CONSTRUCTION
State Reimbursement 0
Littleton Share – New Construction
$26,000,000
Littleton Share – Scheme B5 as proposed $7,162,386
B5 SCHEME
$26,000,000
vs
Dr. Diane BemisLPS Superintendent
Key Project Issues russell street school project
Educational and Safety Concerns
Key Project Issues russell street school project
Educational and Safety Concerns Collaborative planning included teachers, administrators, and owner’s project manager (OPM)
Safety/Security CORI
Noise Meals Grade 5 @ LMS
Location Schedule Lunch
Key Project Issues russell street school project
Educational and Safety Concerns (cont.)
Tiger’s Den Playground CASE Classes Alternatives studied
Move all students out of RSS during repair project Shaker Lane School and Littleton High School
Delays Days Weeks
Mr. Steve VenutiTreasurer, Town of Littleton
Key Project Issues russell street school project
Financial Recap
Financial Recap russell street school project
Reimbursements from MSBA received throughout project
Monthly submittals to MSBA Use reimbursement dollars to pay current bills Minimizes interest payments during construction
Lowers the final bond amount to Littleton’s share only
MSBA Reimbursements
Financial Recap russell street school project
Short term borrowing beginning June / July 2009 Average $3 million - $4 million during project Bond issued 1st quarter 2011 for Town’s total share - $7,423,186 1st payment due FY12
Bonding Timeline
Financial Recap russell street school project
Greatest Impact in FY12 Approximately $150 to $215 depending on interest rate Decreases each year with principal reduction
Qualified School Construction Bond Available under President’s Stimulus Plan Provides 0% interest
Tax Rate Impacts
Summary russell street school project
Demonstrated needInfrastructure modernizedCode/legal compliance Repair option most cost effective Detailed plan ready to execute Safety/Security not compromisedEducation continuity ensuredReimbursable
The RSS Repair Project is a win-win for Littleton
Summary russell street school project
RSS Repair ProjectIs Supported by:
Massachusetts School Building Authority
Board of SelectmenFINCOM
School CommitteePermanent Municipal Building Committee
School Building Committee
Support russell street school project
Questions
russell street school project
Questions